Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical characteristics predicting internal neurofibromas in 357 children with neurofibromatosis-1: results from a cross-selectional study

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 7, Article number: 62 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To identify clinical characteristics associated with internal neurofibromas in children with NF1, as a means of ensuring the early identification of patients at high risk for malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors developed from preexisting internal neurofibromas.

Patients and methods

We used data from two NF1 populations, in France and North America, respectively. The French database comprised 1083 patients meeting NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 and the Neurofibromatosis Institute Database of North America comprised 703 patients. Patients younger than 17 years of age were eligible for our study if they had been evaluated for internal neurofibromas using computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical characteristics associated with internal neurofibromas by univariate analysis (P ≤ 0.15) were entered into a multiple logistic regression model after checking for potential interactions and confounding. Multiple imputation was used for missing values.

Results

Among the 746 children in the two databases, 357 (48%) met our inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 7.7 ± 5.0 years and there were 192 (53.8%) males. Internal neurofibromas were present in 35 (9.8%) patients. Internal neurofibromas developed earlier in females than in males and their prevalence increased during adolescence. Factors independently associated with internal neurofibromas were age (OR = 1.16 [1.07-1.27]), xanthogranulomas (OR = 5.85 [2.18-15.89]) and presence of both subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas (OR = 6.80 [1.52-30.44]).

Conclusions

Several easily recognizable clinical characteristics indicate a high risk of internal neurofibromas in children with NF1 and, therefore, a need for very close monitoring.

Background

Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1 [MIM 162200]) is a common autosomal dominant disorder with an incidence of 1 in 2500–3000 births and a prevalence of 1 in 4000[1]. NF1 is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates[2, 3]. In spite of tremendous progress in understanding and treating NF1, there continues to be inconsistency, if not confusion about the various types of neurofibromas. Our interest in this article is to sensitize clinicians to NF1 neurofibromas that are not obvious by inspection and/or palpation of the skin. That is, the focus is on internal neurofibromas. An internal neurofibroma simply is a neurofibroma that is not appreciated by physical examination. Part of the problem is that some neurofibromas that may have internal components may also be apparent externally. In particular, both the large diffuse plexiform neurofibroma and the large nodular plexiform neurofibroma, as described by Riccardi[4], corresponding to Masson’s diffuse neurofibroma and encapsulated neurofibroma, respectively, as utilized by Tucker and coworkers[5, 6], can have both external and internal components. In the present article we are reserving the term, internal neurofibroma, for those neurofibromas not having an apparent external component. By definition, both cutaneous neurofibromas and subcutaneous neurofibromas are excluded from being internal neurofibromas. Most specifically, the term, plexiform neurofibroma, does not on its own afford distinction from or inclusion in what we are specifying here as an internal neurofibroma.

Internal neurofibromas are among the main causes of life-threatening events in patients with NF1[4, 7]. Ten percent of internal neurofibromas undergo transformation to malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors (MPNSTs)[8], a leading cause of death in adults with NF1[2, 3]. Clinical indicators of MPNST are persistent or increasing pain, enlargement of the tumor, and neurological deficiencies[9]. The diagnosis is often delayed, especially for deep diffuse plexiform or internal neurofibromas as imaging studies are not performed routinely as part of the follow-up of patients with NF1[10] but instead are ordered only as clinically indicated[11]. The mean age at diagnosis of MPNST is younger in patients with NF1 than in unaffected individuals[8, 12–14]. MPNSTs may develop before 30 years of age[8, 12] and even in childhood[13]. Moreover internal neurofibromas grow faster in young patients[15]. In previous work, we developed a simple scoring system (the NF1Score) that accurately predicted the presence of internal neurofibromas at risk for transformation to MPNST in adults with NF1[16]. Four characteristics were independently associated with internal neurofibromas: presence of subcutaneous neurofibromas, fewer than 6 café-au-lait spots, absence of cutaneous neurofibromas, and age ≤30 years. However, the NF1Score was developed in patients aged 17 years or older. Consequently, a specific study was needed in pediatric patients. The clinical expression of NF1 varies across the life span in a given patient[11, 17]. For instance, café-au-lait spots are present within the first year of life and cutaneous or subcutaneous neurofibromas are usually present by adolescence[1, 17, 18].

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical characteristics associated with internal neurofibromas in children with NF1. Such clinical characteristics could serve to ensure the early identification of children with NF1 who require particularly close monitoring for internal neurofibromas.

Patients and methods

Population and study samples

The study was performed using data from two NF1 populations, one in France and the other in North America. Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for NF1 established at the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference[19] were included prospectively by the NF-France network (Réseau NF-France) from 2002 to 2005[20] and the Neurofibromatosis Institute Database (NFID) from 1977 to 1996[4]. The NF-France database was a French Clinical Research Program entitled “Study of expressivity of neurofibromatosis-1: constitution of a phenotype-genotype database”[20]. The NFID is a collaborative system for collecting demographic information, clinical signs and symptoms, basic measurements, and psychosocial assessments of individuals and families with neurofibromatosis[4]. The NF-France database included 1083 patients and the NFID 703 patients. For the present study, patients were eligible if they were younger than 17 years of age and had undergone imaging studies to look for internal neurofibromas because of symptoms such as pain or neurologic deficits or when there was evidence of internal neurofibromas on other imaging studies (Figure1). In all, 357 children met these criteria.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart.

Full size image

The study was approved by the Île-de-France IX Ethics committee Paris, France. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study adhered to Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.

Data collection

The demographic information (age, sex, and whether the NF1 was familial or sporadic) and clinical characteristics recorded in the databases were collected during routine clinical assessments at neurofibromatosis clinics (Table1). Among the clinical characteristics, we selected those known to be associated with mortality in children with NF1 (plexiform neurofibromas) or showing trends toward an association with mortality in NF1 patients (subcutaneous neurofibromas, absence of cutaneous neurofibromas, and short stature)[21]. Special attention was also given to clinical characteristics independently associated with internal neurofibromas in adult NF1 patients, namely, fewer than 6 café-au-lait spots, age ≤30 years (a criterion met by all our patients), and subcutaneous and cutaneous neurofibromas[16]. Most of the other clinical characteristics selected for our study were easily identified by physical examination, with the exception of Lisch nodules, which were evaluated by slit lamp examination. Detailed information was available on the dermatological characteristics, namely, freckles, plexiform neurofibromas, and xanthogranulomas (previous or current diagnosis). We recorded the following characteristics as present or absent: facial asymmetry, orthopedic complications (nonunion, dysplasia), hypertension, and macrocephaly.

Table 1 General characteristics of the 357 children with neurofibromatosis-1 included in the study
Full size table

Study definitions

Cutaneous neurofibromas are exophytic tumors that move with the skin on examination[4]. Subcutaneous neurofibromas lie deeper in the skin, do not move with the skin, and are firm and sometimes tender to palpation[4]. A plexiform neurofibroma is an area of thick hypertrophic skin with tissue hyperpigmentation overlying a subcutaneous tumor[4]. Xanthogranulomas are soft, flat, yellow-to-pink papules. Macrocephaly was defined as a head circumference 2 SDs or more above the age- and sex-matched population mean. Short stature was defined as a height 2 SDs or more below the age- and sex-matched population mean.

Classification of patients: identification of internal neurofibromas

All the study patients had been evaluated for internal neurofibromas using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The presence of internal neurofibromas was coded 1 in the databases.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables are described as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Age was not converted to a categorical variable. Qualitative variables are described as number (%). All tests were two-tailed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The characteristics of patients with and without internal neurofibromas were compared in univariate analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), using logistic regression models. ORs were adjusted for age because the prevalence of several NF1 characteristics varies with age (number of café-au-lait spots and cutaneous and subcutaneous neurofibromas). Potential interactions were assessed by pairwise analyses and confounding by fitting multiplicative models. Variables yielding P values smaller than 0.15 in the univariate analyses were entered into a multiple logistic regression model. The final model included the variables independently associated with the presence of internal neurofibromas.

We first conducted an analysis without the individuals who had missing data (complete-case analysis). We then estimated the missing values for the co-variates independently associated with the internal neurofibromas in the final model, using the multiple-multivariate-imputations-by-chained-equations procedure in STATA[22], with the missing-at-random assumption. We used all predictors together to impute the missing data values, and we independently analyzed 10 copies of the data using 10 cycles of regression. Logistic regression for binary variables and multinomial logistic regression for categorical variables with k > 2 classes were used to impute missing values.

We conducted all statistical analysis using STATA Statistical Software (version 11.0, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) and LogXact-8 software (2007, CYTEL Inc. Cambridge, MA, USA).

Results

Study population

Table1 reports the main characteristics of the 357 children with NF1 included in our study. Mean age was 7.7 (±5.0) years (range, 0.01-16.9), and there were 192 (53.8%) males. Internal neurofibromas were present in 35 (9.8%) patients. The prevalence of internal neurofibromas increased during adolescence (Figure2). Internal neurofibromas developed earlier in females than in males (Figure3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Probability of having internal neurofibromas with the 95% Confidence Interval.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Probability of having internal neurofibromas stratified by sex (females black line and males grey line).

Full size image

Characteristics associated with internal neurofibromas

Table2 compares the clinical characteristics in the patients with and without internal neurofibromas. By univariate analysis, five variables were associated or nearly associated with internal neurofibromas: age (continuous variable), subcutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, and xanthogranulomas.

Table 2 Univariate analysis of selected characteristics for associations with the presence of internal neurofibromas in 357 children with neurofibromatosis-1
Full size table

The presence of Lisch nodules was strongly associated with the other variables and was not independently associated with internal neurofibromas in the multivariate analysis. The study of potential interactions between variables showed a effect modification between plexiform neurofibromas and subcutaneous neurofibromas (P = 0.10). To facilitate the interpretation of the model, the usual assessment of interaction effects is done by entering an additional variable composed of the product of the two variables[23]. So, we replaced the interaction term by a composite variable: no subcutaneous and no plexiform neurofibromas (reference category), either subcutaneous or plexiform neurofibromas, and both subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas. We chose these three categories because subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas had closely similar OR values by univariate analysis (Table2).

By multivariate analysis, three characteristics were independently associated with internal neurofibromas: age, presence of xanthogranulomas and presence of both subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas (Table3).

Table 3 Characteristics independently associated with internal neurofibromas in the multivariate analysis on complete cases (n = 184) and after multiple imputation (n = 357)
Full size table

The general pattern of the results after multiple imputation was similar to that obtained in the patient subset with complete data (Table3). P values were smaller for all three variables independently associated with internal neurofibromas. The OR for the presence of subcutaneous or plexiform neurofibromas was similar between the complete-case and imputed models. The bound categories were thinner as the multivariate analysis included all cases after multiple imputation.

Discussion

In this study, we identified easily recognizable clinical characteristics associated with internal neurofibromas in children with NF1. By multivariate analysis, age, xanthogranulomas, and presence of both subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas were independently associated with internal neurofibromas.

NF1 has been reported to be associated with a 15-year decrease in life expectancy[2]. We recently reported overall excess mortality in a cohort of 1895 patients with NF1 compared to the general population in France[3]. Excess mortality occurred among NF1 patients aged 10 to 20 years (Standard Mortality Ratio, SMR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.6-9.3; P < 10-4) and 20 to 40 years (SMR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.8-5.8; P < 10-4). MPNSTs were the main cause of death (60%)[3]. Thus, the main concern in the long-term clinical management of patients with NF-1 is the identification of patients at high risk for MPNSTs developed from preexisting internal neurofibromas[2]. Although no effective treatment is available for inoperable MPNSTs, several novel targeted treatments may hold promise[20]. We therefore developed a clinical score, the NF1Score, for predicting the presence of internal neurofibromas in adults with NF1[16].

Internal neurofibromas grow faster in young children than in adults[15]. Volumetric MRI has been used to assess the growth rate of internal neurofibromas in 49 NF1 patients (median age, 8.3 years; range, 3.3-25) with a median follow up of 34 months. The growth rate per year of internal neurofibromas was significantly greater in the younger patients (<8.3 years) than in the older patients (21.1% versus 8.4%, P = 0.001). In addition, if effective treatments are found, they will be more likely to prevent the growth of internal neurofibromas than to reduce their size[24]. Therefore, the benefits will probably be greatest if the treatments are given at the time of most rapid internal neurofibroma growth, that is, in childhood or adolescence. Therefore, the risk factors identified in our study will help to improve the clinical management of children with NF1.

Many factors support the internal validity of our study. First, all patients had a definitive diagnosis of NF1. Selection bias seems unlikely, as the prevalence of NF1 characteristics were consistent with those reported previously in other populations of NF1 patients[25, 26]. Our study provided a good external validation as it was performed using two NF1 populations, from France and North America, respectively. However, our patients were recruited at hospitals and may therefore have had greater disease severity compared to the overall NF1 population. An important strength of our study is the accuracy of the information on internal neurofibroma status obtained by using MRI or CT. However, the absence of routine MRI or CT in the study population may constitute a limitation of our study. MRI or CT was performed only when routine imaging studies (chest radiograph and abdominal sonogram) or clinical symptoms suggested the presence of internal neurofibromas. Half our patients did not undergo MRI or CT. This may have resulted in verification bias. Finally, to validate the final model, we used multiple imputation analysis to deal with the missing values. Multiple imputations allow individuals with incomplete data to be included in analyses and improve the validity of the results. The empirical rule of entering only one variable per 10 events in a multivariate analysis model was followed[27].

Internal neurofibromas were present in 35 (9.8%) patients, in keeping with previous data. In a study of 53 children with NF1 who underwent MRI of the entire spine, 7 (13.2%) patients had internal spinal neurofibromas[28]. In our study, older age was independently associated with internal neurofibromas. Excess risk of developing internal neurofibromas seems to occur between the adolescence and the age of to 30 in NF1 patients. Moreover internal neurofibromas increased during adolescence and developed earlier in females, in agreement with previous data[29]. Changes in steroid hormone production may affect the NF1 phenotype. Immunostaining studies have provided support for this hypothesis by identifying the progesterone receptor in neurofibromas[30]. Estrogen and progesterone increased the growth rate of MPNSTs xenografts in mice[31]. Plexiform and subcutaneous neurofibromas were also independently associated with internal neurofibromas in our study, in accordance with earlier work in both adults and children[7, 32]. In the MRI study of the spine in children with NF1, characteristics found more often in patients with than without internal neurofibromas included scoliosis (71.4% vs. 30.4%), subcutaneous neurofibromas (71.4% vs. 39.1%), and plexiform neurofibromas (28.6% vs. 8.7%); none of these differences was statistically significant, (P = 0.08, P = 0.22, and P = 0.17, respectively), possibly because statistical power was limited[28]. Furthermore, patients with subcutaneous neurofibromas were at higher risk for mortality in two different NF1 populations, from France[33] and North America[21], respectively. Finally, xanthogranulomas were independently associated with internal neurofibromas in our study. NF1 children with xanthogranulomas are at increased risk for juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia[34]. Although it should be noted that this study included a small number of patients and has not been confirmed since. To our knowledge, xanthogranulomas have not been previously reported to be associated with internal neurofibromas.

In sum, we identified easily recognizable clinical characteristics that were associated with internal neurofibromas in children with NF1. These risk factors could be used to ensure the early identification of NF1 patients who require particularly close monitoring for internal neurofibromas. In the future, this approach may allow the initiation of treatments at the time of fastest growth of internal neurofibromas, when they are most likely to be effective.

Study funding

Grant from the programme hospitalier de recherche clinique (PHRC, AOM 02 108/P 020906), French Ministry of Health.

Abbreviations

aOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

MPNST:

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NF-1:

Neurofibromatosis 1

SC-NF(s):

Subcutaneous neurofibroma(s)

SD:

Standard deviation.

References

  1. Huson SM, Compston DA, Clark P, Harper PS: A genetic study of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. I. Prevalence, fitness, mutation rate, and effect of parental transmission on severity. J Med Genet. 1989, 26 (11): 704-711. 10.1136/jmg.26.11.704.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rasmussen SA, Yang Q, Friedman JM: Mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: an analysis using U.S. death certificates. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68 (5): 1110-1118. 10.1086/320121.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duong TA, Sbidian E, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Vialette C, Ferkal S, Hadj-Rabia S, et al: Mortality associated with neurofibromatosis 1: a cohort study of 1895 patients in 1980–2006 in France. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011, 6: 18-10.1186/1750-1172-6-18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riccardi VM: Neurofibromatosis: phenotype, natural history, and pathogenesis. 1992, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tucker T, Riccardi VM, Brown C, Fee J, Sutcliffe M, Vielkind J, et al: S100B and neurofibromin immunostaining and X-inactivation patterns of laser-microdissected cells indicate a multicellular origin of some NF1-associated neurofibromas. J Neurosci Res. 2011, 89 (9): 1451-1460. 10.1002/jnr.22654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tucker T, Riccardi VM, Sutcliffe M, Vielkind J, Wechsler J, Wolkenstein P, et al: Different patterns of mast cells distinguish diffuse from encapsulated neurofibromas in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011, 59 (6): 584-590. 10.1369/0022155411407340.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tucker T, Wolkenstein P, Revuz J, Zeller J, Friedman JM: Association between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1. Neurology. 2005, 65 (2): 205-211. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168830.79997.13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2002, 39 (5): 311-314. 10.1136/jmg.39.5.311.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ismaili N, Bastuji-Garin S, Zeller J, Wechsler J, Revuz J, et al: Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Br J Dermatol. 2005, 153 (1): 79-82. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinson S, Creange A, Barbarot S, Stalder JF, Chaix Y, Rodriguez D, et al: Neurofibromatosis 1: recommendations for management. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2001, 128 (4): 567-575.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, Korf B, Marks J, Pyeritz RE, et al: The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA. 1997, 278 (1): 51-57. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010065042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagel C, Zils U, Peiper M, Kluwe L, Gotthard S, Friedrich RE, et al: Histopathology and clinical outcome of NF1-associated vs. sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neurooncol. 2007, 82 (2): 187-192. 10.1007/s11060-006-9266-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedrich RE, Hartmann M, Mautner VF: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) in NF1-affected children. Anticancer Res. 2007, 27 (4A): 1957-1960.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCaughan JA, Holloway SM, Davidson R, Lam WW: Further evidence of the increased risk for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour from a Scottish cohort of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Med Genet. 2007, 44 (7): 463-466. 10.1136/jmg.2006.048140.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dombi E, Solomon J, Gillespie AJ, Fox E, Balis FM, Patronas N, et al: NF1 plexiform neurofibroma growth rate by volumetric MRI: relationship to age and body weight. Neurology. 2007, 68 (9): 643-647. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000250332.89420.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sbidian E, Wolkenstein P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Rodriguez D, Hadj-Rabia S, Ferkal S, et al: NF-1Score: a prediction score for internal neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis-1. J Invest Dermatol. 2010, 130 (9): 2173-2178. 10.1038/jid.2010.100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duong TA, Bastuji-Garin S, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Sbidian E, Ferkal S, Wolkenstein P: Evolving pattern with age of cutaneous signs in neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study of 728 patients. Dermatology. 2011, 222 (3): 269-273. 10.1159/000327379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolkenstein P, Freche B, Zeller J, Revuz J: Usefulness of screening investigations in neurofibromatosis type 1. A study of 152 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1996, 132 (11): 1333-1336. 10.1001/archderm.1996.03890350075012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neurofibromatosis: Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch Neurol. 1988, 45 (5): 575-578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabbagh A, Pasmant E, Laurendeau I, Parfait B, Barbarot S, Guillot B, et al: Unravelling the genetic basis of variable clinical expression in neurofibromatosis 1. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18 (15): 2768-2778. 10.1093/hmg/ddp212.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khosrotehrani K, Bastuji-Garin S, Riccardi VM, Birch P, Friedman JM, Wolkenstein P: Subcutaneous neurofibromas are associated with mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: a cohort study of 703 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 132A (1): 49-53. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al: Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009, 338: b2393-10.1136/bmj.b2393.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schumacker RE, Marcoulides GA: Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim A, Gillespie A, Dombi E, Goodwin A, Goodspeed W, Fox E, et al: Characteristics of children enrolled in treatment trials for NF1-related plexiform neurofibromas. Neurology. 2009, 73 (16): 1273-1279. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bd1326.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DeBella K, Szudek J, Friedman JM: Use of the national institutes of health criteria for diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 in children. Pediatrics. 2000, 105 (3 Pt 1): 608-614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cnossen MH, de Goede-Bolder A, van den Broek KM, Waasdorp CM, Oranje AP, Stroink H, et al: A prospective 10 year follow up study of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Dis Child. 1998, 78 (5): 408-412. 10.1136/adc.78.5.408.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB: Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996, 15 (4): 361-387. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khong PL, Goh WH, Wong VC, Fung CW, Ooi GC: MR imaging of spinal tumors in children with neurofibromatosis 1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003, 180 (2): 413-417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tucker T, Friedman JM, Friedrich RE, Wenzel R, Funsterer C, Mautner VF: Longitudinal study of neurofibromatosis 1 associated plexiform neurofibromas. J Med Genet. 2009, 46 (2): 81-85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Overdiek A, Winner U, Mayatepek E, Rosenbaum T: Schwann cells from human neurofibromas show increased proliferation rates under the influence of progesterone. Pediatr Res. 2008, 64 (1): 40-43. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817445b8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li H, Zhang X, Fishbein L, Kweh F, Campbell-Thompson M, Perrin GQ, et al: Analysis of steroid hormone effects on xenografted human NF1 tumor schwann cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010, 10 (8): 758-764. 10.4161/cbt.10.8.12878.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sbidian E, Bastuji-Garin S, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ferkal S, Lefaucheur JP, Drouet A, et al: At-Risk Phenotype of Neurofibromatose-1 Patients: A Multicentre Case–control Study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011, 6 (1): 51-10.1186/1750-1172-6-51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khosrotehrani K, Bastuji-Garin S, Zeller J, Revuz J, Wolkenstein P: Clinical risk factors for mortality in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a cohort study of 378 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2003, 139 (2): 187-191. 10.1001/archderm.139.2.187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zvulunov A, Barak Y, Metzker A: Juvenile xanthogranuloma, neurofibromatosis, and juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. world statistical analysis. Arch Dermatol. 1995, 131 (8): 904-908. 10.1001/archderm.1995.01690200040007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the study sponsor Département de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement (Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP). We are grateful to the two nonprofit organizations Association Neurofibromatoses et Recklinghausen and Ligue française de lutte contre les Neurofibromatoses for supporting this study. We are indebted to A. Wolfe MD for her helpful review of the manuscript. We express our gratitude to NF-France Network for its precious collaboration: H. Adamski, C. Baumann-Morel, C. Bellanne, E. Bieth, P. Bousquet, C. Brandt, X. Balguerie, L. Boudali, P. Berbis, P. Castelnau, Y. Chaix, J. Chevrant-Breton, E. Collet, J.F. Cuny, P. Chastagner, M.L. Chandeclerc, E. Cheuret, P. Cintas, H. Dollfus, C. Derancourt, V. Drouin-Garraud, M. D'Incan, H. De Leersnyder, O. Dereure, D. Doumar, N. Fabre, V. Ferraro, C. Francannet, L. Faivre, F. Fellmann, N. Feugier, D. Gaillard, A. Goldenberg, L. Guyant-Maréchal, J.S. Guillamo, S. Hadj-Rabia, D. Hamel Teillac, I. Kemlin, J.P. Lacour, V. Laithier, J.C. Leonard, N. Lesavre, S. Lyonnet, K. Maincent, S. Maradeix, L. Machet, E. Mansat, N. Meyer, M. Mozelle, J.C. Moreno, O. Montagne, C. Moret, E. Puzenat, S. Pinson, D. Rodriguez, S. Sportich, J.F. Stalder, E. Schweitzer, C. Thalamas, C. Thauvin, L. Taillandier, A. Verloes and J. Zeller.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Université Paris Est (UPEC), LIC EA4393 (Laboratoire d’Investigation Clinique), Créteil, F-94010, France

      Emilie Sbidian, Laurence L Valeyrie-Allanore, Pierre Wolkenstein & Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

    2. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Service de Dermatologie, Créteil, F-94010, France

      Emilie Sbidian, Laurence L Valeyrie-Allanore, Olivier Chosidow & Pierre Wolkenstein

    3. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Pôle Recherche Clinique-Santé Publique, Créteil, F-94010, France

      Emilie Sbidian & Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

    4. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Centre de référence des Neurofibromatoses, Créteil, F-94010, France

      Laurence L Valeyrie-Allanore, Salah Ferkal, Pierre Wolkenstein & Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

    5. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, Centre de Référence des Maladies Génétiques à Expression Cutanée (MAGEC) et Service de Dermatologie, Université Paris V Descartes, Paris, F-75015, France

      Smaïl Hadj-Rabia

    6. The Neurofibromatosis Institute, La Crescenta, CA, USA

      Vincent M Riccardi

    7. Service de Dermatologie, CHU Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, F-44200, France

      Sébastien Barbarot

    8. Université Paris Est (UPEC), Créteil, F-94010, France

      Olivier Chosidow

    9. INSERM, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 006, Créteil, F-94010, France

      Salah Ferkal

    10. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Trousseau, Service de Neuropédiatrie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, F-75571, France

      Diana Rodriguez

    11. Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Unité de Recherche Clinique (URC), Créteil, F-94010, France

      Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

    12. Service de Santé Publique, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Creteil Cedex, 94010, France

      Sylvie Bastuji-Garin

    Authors
    1. Emilie Sbidian
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Smaïl Hadj-Rabia
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Vincent M Riccardi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Laurence L Valeyrie-Allanore
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Sébastien Barbarot
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Olivier Chosidow
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Salah Ferkal
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Diana Rodriguez
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Pierre Wolkenstein
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Sylvie Bastuji-Garin.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    SBG, PW, DR, SF, OC, SB, LVA, VMR, SHR, ES have non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

    Authors’ contributions

    SBG and PW made substantial contributions to the study conception and design. SBG, PW, SF, SHR, VMR, LVA, ES, DR, and SB made substantial contributions to data acquisition or analysis and to interpretation of the data. ES performed the data analysis under the supervision of SBG. SBG, PW, and ES were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version submitted for publication.

    Pierre Wolkenstein and Sylvie Bastuji-Garin contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Authors’ original file for figure 2

    Authors’ original file for figure 3

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Sbidian, E., Hadj-Rabia, S., Riccardi, V.M. et al. Clinical characteristics predicting internal neurofibromas in 357 children with neurofibromatosis-1: results from a cross-selectional study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7, 62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-62

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-62

    Keywords

    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

    ISSN: 1750-1172