Open Access

Paediatric Chordomas

  • Kévin Beccaria1, 2Email author,
  • Christian Sainte-Rose1, 2,
  • Michel Zerah1, 2 and
  • Stéphanie Puget1, 2
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201510:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0340-8

Received: 13 May 2015

Accepted: 7 September 2015

Published: 22 September 2015

Abstract

Paediatric chordomas are rare malignant tumours arising from primitive notochordal remnants with a high rate of recurrence. Only 5 % of them occur in the first two decades such less than 300 paediatric cases have been reported so far in the literature. In children, the average age at diagnosis is 10 years with a male-to-female ratio closed to 1. On the opposite to adults, the majority of paediatric chordomas are intracranial, characteristically centered on the sphenooccipital synchondrosis. Metastatic spread seems to be the prerogative of the under 5-year-old children with more frequent sacro-coccygeal locations and undifferentiated histology. The clinical presentation depends entirely on the tumour location. The most common presenting symptoms are diplopia and signs of raised intracranial pressure. Sacrococcygeal forms may present with an ulcerated subcutaneous mass, radicular pain, bladder and bowel dysfunctions. Diagnosis is suspected on computerised tomography showing the bone destruction and with typically lobulated appearance, hyperintense on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Today, treatment relies on as complete surgical resection as possible (rarely achieved because of frequent invasiveness of functional structures) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy by proton therapy. The role of chemotherapy has not been proven. Prognosis is better than in adults and depends on the extent of surgical resection, age and histology subgroup. Biological markers are still lacking to improve prognosis by developing targeted therapy.

Keywords

PaediatricChordoma

Résumé

Les chordomes pédiatriques sont des tumeurs rares développées à partir de résidus de la notochorde primitive et qui présentent un haut taux de récidive locale. Les chordomes des sujets de moins de 20 ans représentent seulement 5 % de l’ensemble de ces tumeurs, justifiant que moins de 300 cas de chordomes pédiatriques aient été publiés dans la littérature à ce jour. Chez l’enfant, l’âge moyen au diagnostic est de 10 ans avec un ratio garçon-fille proche de 1. Contrairement à l’adulte, la majorité des chordomes pédiatriques sont intra-crâniens, typiquement localisés en regard de la synchondrose sphéno-occipitale. La dissémination métastatique semble être l’apanage des enfants de moins de 5 ans, avec des localisations sacro-coccygiennes et une histologie indifférenciée plus fréquentes. La présentation clinique dépend essentiellement de la localisation de la tumeur. Les symptômes les plus fréquemment retrouvés au diagnostic sont la diplopie et les signes d’hypertension intra-crânienne. Les formes sacro-coccygiennes peuvent se présenter sous la forme d’une masse sous-cutanée ulcérée, ou bien par des douleurs radiculaires ou des troubles vésico-sphinctériens. Le diagnostic est suspecté devant une lésion ostéolytique au scanner, classiquement lobulée et en hypersignal T2 en IRM. Aujourd’hui, le traitement repose sur une résection chirurgicale aussi complète que possible (rarement obtenue du fait de l’envahissement fréquent de structures fonctionnelles par ces tumeurs), suivie d’une radiothérapie adjuvante aux protons. Le rôle de la chimiothérapie n’a pas été démontré. Le pronostic est meilleur chez l’enfant que chez l’adulte, et il dépend de la qualité de la résection chirurgicale, de l’âge et du type histologique. A ce jour, aucun marqueur n’a pu être mis en évidence, qui permettrait de développer des thérapies ciblées et améliorer le pronostic de ces tumeurs.

Introduction

Paediatric chordomas are rare malignant tumours which involve the cranial base and spinal column. They seem to be different from their adult’s counterparts. The aim of this article is to give an update review of clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic criteria, genetic markers, prognosis factors and current treatment. Data discussed in this review were obtained from a Pubmed search with the terms « paediatric », « pediatric » and « chordoma ».

Review

Disease name/synonyms

Chordoma ORPHA178

Definition

Chordomas are rare tumours arising from primitive notochordal remnants [1]. Their anatomopathological classification is the same for adults and children and distinguishes “classic” (“chordoma NOS” Not Otherwise Specified), “chondroid” and “undifferentiated” chordomas.

Luschka first described the existence of small soft transparent “jelly-like” tumours of the clivus blumenbachii (dorsum sellae) in 1857 [2], and Ribbert introduced the term “chordoma” thirty years later [3]. While one of the first cases of chordoma was described by Klebs in 1864, the first paediatric cases were reported many years later by André-Thomas [4] and Adson [5] in 1923 and 1935.

The diagnosis of a patient with a chordoma is based on clinical, topographical and radiological (multilobulated, hyperintensity in T2 weighted sequences) findings, and is then confirmed by characteristic histological findings. Chordomas are characterized by their aggressive potential and their frequency of recurrence. Management of these tumours is based on as complete as possible primary resection followed by local irradiation, ideally proton beam therapy.

Epidemiology

Chordomas comprise 0.2 % of primary brain tumours [6, 7] and less than 5 % of primary bone tumours [6, 8, 9]. They occur in less than 1/1,000,000 population [8, 10], with a peak incidence occurring between the fourth and sixth decades [1113]. Less than 5 % of chordomas present in the first two decades [11, 1416].

Among children, the average age at diagnosis was around 10 years [1520], and the youngest case described was in a neonate with a tumour of the clivus [21]. In contrast to adults [6, 12, 22], sacro-coccygeal chordomas in children occur at a younger age than those in the cranium. For all localisations, the male to female ratio is close to 1 [15, 18].

Clinical description

Anatomical localisation

In the literature, childhood chordomas are clearly distinguished from their adult’s counterparts by their anatomical distribution. Adult chordomas are primarily found in the sacro-coccygeal region [13, 15, 2325], whereas the majority of paediatric chordomas are intracranial (up to 54 %) [15], characteristically centered on the sphenooccipital synchondrosis [11, 15, 17, 26, 27]. Local destruction of the clivus with extradural compression of the neuroaxis is a characteristic feature. Other locations are anecdotic (gluteal region [28], paranasal sinuses [29], ethmoid and maxillary sinuses [30], temporal bone [31]). Cases of intradural lesions [3234] and chordomas arising in the paravertebral or paraclival regions without associated bony invasion have also rarely been reported [35, 36].

Intracranial chordomas

Impairment of cranial nerve function is the principle presenting feature of chordomas of the cranial base in approximately 60 % of cases [19, 23], the sixth nerve being the most frequently involved (55 to 72 % of cases) [16]. Headaches occur in around 40 % of cases [16, 23], due to increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in 28 % of cases [23]. Long tract signs with a pyramidal syndrome may occur in 36 % of cases [23].

Children less than 5 years present frequently with increased ICP (72 %), long tract signs (43 %) and also lower cranial nerves palsy and torticollis probably due to a more frequent inferior extension of lesions at this age [24]. Older children will present with diplopia or isolated headaches (55 % et 42 % respectively) [21, 23, 24].

Sacro-coccygeal chordomas

These present with the rapid appearance of an eventually ulcerated subcutaneous mass [3739] occasionally massive within the presacral space. Perineal pain, radicular pain [39, 40] or cauda equina syndrome may occur [39, 40]. Bladder and bowel dysfunction is common through compression and/or invasion of the nerves of the cauda equina or by direct compression of the urinary tract and colon by the presacral mass [37, 41].

Vertebral column chordomas

The predominant symptoms depend on the orientation and development of the tumour. In the majority of cases, posterior enlargement of the tumour causes compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina [17, 26, 4245]. Anterior progression can present with respiratory dysfunction and/or dysphagia in those tumours of the cervical and thoracic regions [46]. Pain is common and rigidity and/or spinal deformity have been similarly reported [17, 43, 47, 48].

Metastatic dissemination

The incidence of chordoma metastases is quite variable, from 8.6 to 58 % in children [15, 1719]. There appears to be a link between their incidence and local recurrence [19, 49]. Metastatic spread seems to be the prerogative of the under 5-year-olds [16, 23, 50], and essentially concerns tumours of the sacro-coccygeal region or of the spinal column. Metastatic dissemination primarily occurs via the blood circulation, but also via the cerebrospinal fluid, either via the subarachnoid spaces [50, 51] or through ventricular shunting [52]. There is also the risk of metastatic tumour deposition through the surgical route [53]. The principle site of metastases is the lungs [1517, 34, 51, 5457], followed by bone [50, 57], lymph nodes (cervical, inguinal, sub-clavicular) [15, 17, 57, 58], skin [50, 59], liver [19, 50, 59] and anecdotally the brain and spinal cord [59], meninges [50, 51], heart [59], pleura [15], kidney [59] and suprarenal glands [17, 23].

Aetiology

Embryology

The term “notochorde” comes from the ancient greek noton (back) and chorde (cord), literally “dorsal cord”. It is a dorsal tubular structure occurring in embryos of all chordates [60]. In vertebrates, the notochord is replaced during development by the vertebral column and part of the cranial base. It has long been considered that the nucleus pulposus was the point of origin of chordomas. However, the origin of chordomas from the vertebral bodies, their main localisations at the extremities of the cranio-vertebral axis [13, 15, 23] and the absence of brachyury (a specific marker of chordomas) in the intervertebral discs [61] place into doubt the link between chordomas and the nucleus pulposus.

The fact that chordomas arise from notochordal cells is supported by different arguments. Apart from their identical location, there exists morphological and immunophenotypical similarities between the cells of chordomas and those of the notochord [62].

In fact, chordomas arise from notochordal remnants from an incomplete involution of the notochord and different from “normal” remnants potentially found in the nuclei pulposi.

Molecular biology

Publications on this subject are infrequent and not specific to childhood chordomas. The majority of chordomas demonstrate hypodiploidy or pseudodiploidy with numerous structural rearrangements. Chromosomal deletions are more frequent than gains. The more frequent cytogenetic anomalies are monosomy 1 and a gain on chromosome 7 [63].

The brachyury growth factor (growth factor T) is a specific marker of chordomas, implicated in notochordal development. Its locus 6q27 is frequently amplified within chordoma cells and its inactivation can block growth of chordoma tumour cell lines (U-CH1) in vitro [64].

Numerous tyrosine kinase receptors are richly expressed in chordoma cells, such as EGFR (epithelial growth factor) [65], α and β PDGFR (platelet-derived growth factor), c-KIT [66, 67] and IGF-1 receptor [68]. Tumour suppressor genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B [17, 69] and FHIT [69] may also be implicated in the oncogenesis of chordomas.

Mutation of tumour suppressor genes TSC1 et TSC2 is seen in patients with chordomas associated with Tuberous Sclerosis. This association is specific to the paediatric population. Chordomas in these patients occur in very young children, are frequently sacral with a better long term prognosis [70]. The genes TSC1 and TSC2, being of the mTOR pathway, have raised the possibility that this pathway is implicated in intracellular signalling for oncogenesis in chordomas.

Diagnostic methods

Computerised tomography (CT) [71]

CT is essential for evaluating bony integrity and bone destruction of the skull base and also potential vertebral instability induced by tumour invasion (Fig. 1). In brain windows chordomas often appear heterogeneous due to the interspersing of tumour tissue (isodense), with areas of necrosis or myxoid cysts (hypodense). The hyperdensity frequently observed corresponds to bony sequestration from destruction of cortical and cancellous bone rather than tumoural calcification.
Fig. 1

CT scanner of a clival chordoma. a. Axial brain window. The retroclival lesion developed posteriorly (dotted line) with contact to the brainstem (arrowhead). b. Axial bone window. Erosion of both posterior clinoid proccesses by the chordoma (arrows). c. Erosion of the posterior side f the clivus (arrow)

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI provides accurate evaluation of the involvement of the adjacent soft tissues, including vasculature, cranial nerves, and changes in the brainstem related to tumour itself. Chordomas are iso/hypointense on T1-weighted images, with hyperintensity due to haemorrhage or cyst formation. The lesion is typically hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with a lobulated appearance and multiple hypointense septae (Fig. 2). The majority of intracranial chordomas demonstrate moderate to marked heterogeneous enhancement following contrast. If present, it is often heterogeneous, with a “honeycomb” appearance of the septae, whilst areas of necrosis or mucoid containing remain iso/hypointense.
Fig. 2

T2 weighted MRI of a clival chordoma. a. Axial plane. A voluminous chordoma developed from the clivus with extension to both cerebellopontine angles (single arrowheads). Brainstem is pushed back posteriorly (double arrowhead). b. Sagittal plane. The chordoma eroded the inferior part of the clivus (asterisk) and developed anteriorly to the cervical spine. Typical lobulated appearance with multiples hypointense septae can be observed

Angiography

Angiography is rarely useful but may provide additional informations to determine the relationship of the chordoma to vascular structures when equivoque on MR angiography. Exceptional temporary occlusion may be performed to determine the potential risk of vascular sacrifice during surgical procedures.

Pathology

Macroscopically chordomas are blue or slate grey tumours, frequently soft and gelatinous. They are encapsulated nodular tumours that may contain areas of haemorrhage, necrosis or even cysts.

Chordomas have been divided into three histopathologic subtypes: typical or conventional chordomas, chondroid chordomas and dedifferentiated chordomas [1]. Microscopically, they have a characteristic architecture comprising of cells arranged in sheets or in lobules surrounded by an abundant myxoid extracellular matrix. Some tumour cells are quite large with numerous intracytoplasmic mucine or glycogen rich vacuoles: these are the characteristic physaliferous cells. Notably, approximately 10 % of chordomas do not contain physaliferous cells; the frequency of these cells can vary from 1 to 100 %. Generally, chordomas demonstrate a high degree of intratumoural heterogeneity [1]. Foci of intratumoural necrosis are frequent and often extensive. Mitoses, nuclear atypia and pleomorphisms are present to a variable degree.

Chondroid chordomas present an extracellular matrix that resembles those of hyaline cartilaginous tumours [1]. The distribution of the different histological entities can vary from simple chondroid foci dispersed within a predominantly chordoid structure to an equal distribution of the chondroid and chordoid components [13, 72].

Undifferentiated chordomas are mixed tumours presenting features of classic chordomas in association with foci of osteosarcoma or of high grade undifferentiated malignant spindle cell tumours [1].

Conventional and chondroid chordomas express epithelial markers including cytokeratins (notably CK 8, 18 and 19), Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), S-100 protein, and specifically brachyury. On the contrary, undifferentiated chordomas lack reactivity for these epithelial markers. Yadav et al. observed that paediatric chordomas more frequently show p53 expression and loss of INI1, and have higher MIB-1 labelling index compared to their adult’s counterparts [73].

The distinction between these diverse chordoma tumour entities is not yet fully elucidated. Immunohistochemistry and molecular biological markers will probably contribute to classify these tumour variants.

Differential diagnosis

  • Benign notochordal cell tumour. These entities could be benign forms of chordoma [74]. Differential diagnosis is made on clinical and histological criterions [75].

  • Chondrosarcomas. Tumours of the median axis, chondrosarcomas have more likely linear or globular calcifications and do not express epithelial markers nor brachyury [76].

  • Chordoid meningiomas. A differential diagnosis of intradural chordomas.

Genetic counselling

There is currently no particular genetic counseling as only few familial chordoma cases have been reported with different genetic abnormalities [7786]. Variable losses of 1p [82, 83], 7q LOH [86] and a unique duplication of a region on 6q27 containing only the T gene (brachyury) [85] have been described.

Management including treatment

Management of chordomas is multidisciplinary and because of the rarity of this disease, should ideally be performed in a specialized centre. Due to the high risk of relapse, management of this disease must be aggressive. The advent of MRI, the advances in neurosurgery (endoscopy) and the contribution of proton beam therapy have allowed considerable prolongation of life for these patients. Indeed, when comparing the survival rates of children treated before and after 1990 in the literature, there is a statistically significant difference in overall survival with the more recent cases having a better outcome (p = 0,001, log rank; data available for 153 cases from a review of 249 cases of intracranial and spinal chordomas). Today, treatment relies on as complete as possible surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy by proton therapy. Standard chemotherapy has no role even if certain authors have utilized chemotherapy with occasionally encouraging results.

Surgery

Surgery is the first and essential step in the treatment of chordomas. The objectives are twofold: (1) maximal reduction in tumour volume with obtaining a macroscopically complete excision and (2) to remove any possible tumour residual away from neurovascular structures (spinal cord, brainstem, large vessels, internal auditory meatus, optic pathways and hypophysis) to maximize radiotherapy dose whilst minimizing secondary effects.

As in adults, all authors agree that the largest surgical resection possible must be achieved at the initial surgery [11, 13, 19, 8790]. This attitude is commonly accepted, even if the paediatric series in the literature are too little to allow a real statistical analysis. Ridenour observed a better survival following a complete excision versus an incomplete excision in 35 children, without achieving statistical significance [18]. The localization of these tumours and the complexity of their extension allows a complete resection in the minority of cases [7, 91] due to the proximity to neural structures (cranial nerves, brainstem, sacral nerves) or vascular structures. The rate of complete surgical excision remains low in the major paediatric series published and varies between 0 % to 36.4 % [11, 1719]. Maximal tumour resection often requires many surgical attempts [92], in utilizing different surgical routes in one or more procedures. The majority of routes to the cranial base currently used in adults may be applied to children with little modification and are well tolerated [93].

Orthopaedic management may be necessary in order to prevent or treat instability when spine is involved [27, 45, 46, 48, 94].

Radiotherapy

Although radiotherapy is currently an integral part of the treatment of adult chordomas, issues regarding both the timing and optimal type of radiotherapy are largely unresolved in the literature [95]. Besides, very few data are available concerning the paediatric population and no comparative study has proven the benefit of radiotherapy following surgical resection in the outcome of paediatric chordomas.

The series published by Wold et al. is the only one that assessed the impact of conventional radiotherapy in paediatric chordomas [11]. Twelve patients (mean age 13.6 years) were treated for intracranial chordomas with a total or partial resection, followed in ten cases by conventional radiotherapy. After a mean follow-up of 67 months, two patients had died from disease, and the overall survival reached 75 % at 5 years. All patients alive at last follow-up had benefited from the association of surgery and radiotherapy. In a more general point of view, Borba et al., in a review of intracranial chordomas, confirmed that surgical excision, whether complete or incomplete, followed by radiotherapy (type not precise), offered a better outcome than surgical excision alone (p = 0.004, outcome of each group not precise) [16]. Actually, the majority of authors have recommended adjuvant radiotherapy [6, 42, 96, 97] after as complete as possible tumour resection.

The necessity of high dose radiotherapy in the treatment of chordomas [98], and the numerous potential complications of radiotherapy in growing children (pituitary deficiency, cognitive and neurosensory impairment, brain radionecrosis, necrosing leucoencephalopathy, fertility disorder, growing disorders) [99] lead to consider proton therapy as a radiotherapy modality of choice for paediatric chordomas, as it reduces by a factor of 2–3 the dose delivered to neighbouring structures [100]. Overall survival rates from 60 to 89 % after 5 to 7.25 years have been observed after treatment of cranial base and cervical chordomas by surgical removal followed by proton therapy (eventually associated with conventional radiotherapy) [19, 20, 101103]. Side effects described in the different series published seem to be limited compared to conventional therapy. They are essentially represented by hypopituitarism, hypoacousy or worsening of anterior visual deficit; temporal lobe necrosis, cerebellar and brainstem parenchymal damage have also been punctually reported [19, 101104]. Proton beam therapy may be used in young children, eventually under general anaesthesia [105]. It has been reported proton irradiation of skull base tumours in patients less than one year of age [106]. Although good outcomes have been reported in the series of patients treated with proton therapy, no study directly compared the results of this radiotherapy modality to those of conventional therapy.

Chemotherapy

Similarly to adults, utilisation of chemotherapy in the management of paediatric chordomas is anecdotal with only 20 or so cases reported in the literature [11, 17, 19, 58, 59, 80, 107109]. Some authors consider that chemotherapy used for sarcomas can also be used in undifferentiated chordomas [59, 110], such as ifosfamide and etoposide [58, 107] or doxorubicine [107, 109]. Whatever the agent used, chemotherapy has been used after relapse or in some metastatic cases with disappointing results. One publication reports a brief case of a 7-month old infant treated for a clival chordoma who had a durable complete response with chemotherapy alone (including vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide and carboplatin) [111], but no data exist on the potential benefit of chemotherapy before any surgery.

Based on recent studies in molecular biology, the tendency in oncology has become to use targeted therapies as adjuvant treatment. Unfortunately, only few adult series have been available so far in the field of chordomas. Symptomatic and radiological improvement has been observed in adult treated by Gleevec® (Imatinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor). This molecule has also been infrequently used in children without encouraging result [67, 112, 113]. Inhibitors of the mTOR pathway (sirolimus) and inhibitors of EGFR (cetuximab/gefitinib) have also been used in cases of resistant chordomas [112] or metastatic chordoma of the sacrum [114]. These observations need to be confirmed through large cohort studies with sufficient follow up and would require genomic analyses of paediatric chordomas, which are probably different compared to their adult’s counterparts.

Prognosis

Globally survival is better in children than in adults except for the aggressive form of chordomas occurring in children under 5 years of age. The overall survival rate in the major paediatric series in the literature varies between 56.8 to 81 % [16, 1820] (Table 1). These results observed in the paediatric population are generally better than those seen in adults where the survival rate varies from 23 to 66 % [115, 116].
Table 1

Outcome of paediatric chordomas observed in the major paediatric series of the literature.

Author

Number of cases

Treatment

Mean follow-up in months (min-max)

Progression free survival (%)

Overall survival (%)

Surgery

Radiotherapy

Chemotherapy

Benk et al.[ 19 ]

18

Partial resection (18)

Proton (18)

-

72 (19–120)

63 (5 years)

68 (5 years)

Borba et al.[ 16 ]

79 (review)

Not precise

Not precise

Not precise

39 (1–300)

-

56.8

Hoch et al.[ 20 ]

73

Total/Partial resection (73)

Proton (73)

-

90 (12–252)

-

81

Ridenour et al.[ 18 ]

20

Partial (14)

Conventional (10)

(2)

129 (1–501)

-

63

Proton (2)

None (2)

Total (4)

Conventional (2)

None (2)

Biopsy (2)

Conventional (2)

Necker - Lariboisière (not published)

34

Partial (24)

Conventional (2)

(3)

78 (0.3-239)

54.3 (15 years)

63

Proton (3)

Conventional + Proton (12)

Radiosurgery (1)

Tomotherapy (1)

None (4)

Unknown (1)

Total (6)

Conventional (2) Proton (3) Conventional + Proton (1)

(1)

Unknown (4)

Histological subtype is probably the main prognostic factor. Atypical and undifferentiated forms have clearly a worst outcome, compared to classic and chondroïd chordomas. Mortality rates for atypical (undifferentiated/poorly differentiated) forms vary from 67 to 83 %, compared to 14 to 27 % mortality rates for classic and chondroïd forms [18, 20].

The localisation of the tumour may also influence the prognostic. Intracranial lesions are considered to have a better outcome than those in the spinal column, which have a better outcome than those in the sacro-coccygeal region [18, 19, 117].

Finally, a major prognostic factor identified in chordomas was age of onset and it is notable that the worst progression occurs in very young children, under the age of 5 years [16, 17, 23, 50, 102, 118] ; the review of intracranial chordomas by Borba is quite clear on this subject [16]. Apart from a few cases, the majority of children less than 5 years reported in the literature died within 18 months following diagnosis despite surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy [15, 2325, 50, 53, 58, 109, 117]. Age, where children under 5 years are more prone to develop more aggressive tumours, however, is not the only factor associated with a poorer outcome. It may be explained by the frequency of sacro-coccygeal localisations and atypical forms, and a more frequent metastatic dissemination.

Unresolved questions

As for their adult’s counterparts, it is now largely admitted that surgery is the first step of the treatment of paediatric chordomas, and that as complete as possible removal has to be reached in order to improve the outcome. Interrogations still persist on the necessity of adjuvant therapy and its modality. Indeed, the usefulness of radiotherapy after total resection of paediatric chordoma is still not established and would deserve prospective analyses in international trials. One may ask if radiotherapy is compulsory after complete resection of a classical chordoma without invasion of functional structures. Moreover, data from the molecular biology will probably help us to distinguish in the future chordomas with a better prognosis that could be eligible to a surgical treatment alone. Although proton therapy has shown good outcomes in different studies, its superiority to other radiotherapy modalities has also to be proven. On the contrary, chemotherapy has shown disappointing results. Recent studies on biomolecular and genetic analyses of chordomas lead to the identification of promising targetable pathways. Use of such new targeted therapies has shown encouraging results in adults in case of advanced disease, but few paediatric patients have been included in these studies. Complementary studies will be necessary in order to assess their role in the treatment of paediatric chordoma, either as neoadjuvant treatment, or in case of progressive disease after standard treatments.

Conclusions

Paediatric chordomas are rare malignant tumours with a high rate of recurrence. While prognosis is better than in adults, patients less than 5 years of age generally present with very aggressive disease and poor outcome. The surgical removal of the tumour still is the first step of the treatment and has to be as complete as possible. As for adults, proton beam therapy is the adjuvant treatment of reference, even if its benefit in some cases may be discussed. The role of chemotherapy has not been proven, but advances in genetics and molecular biology may help to develop targeted therapies during the next decades.

Abbreviations

CT: 

computerised tomography

EGFR: 

epithelial growth factor

ICP: 

intracranial pressure

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

PDGFR: 

platelet-derived growth factor

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
(2)
Faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité

References

  1. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4ème éd. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Luschka P. Ueber gallertartige Auswüchse am Clivus Blumenbachii. Arch Für Pathol Anat Physiol Für Klin Med. 1857;11:8–12.Google Scholar
  3. Ribbert H. Ueber die experimentelle Erzeugung einer Ecchondrosis physalifora. Verh Kongr Inn Med. 1895;13:455.Google Scholar
  4. Andre-Thomas MM, Jumenti J. Chordome De La Region Sphenobasilaire. Rev Neurol. 1923;1:300–304.Google Scholar
  5. Adson A, Kernohan J, Woltman H. Cranial and Cervical Chordomas. Arch. Neur. & Psych. 1935;33:241–61. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlin DC, MacCarty CS. Chordoma. Cancer. 1952;5:1170–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Krayenbühl H, Yasargil M. Cranial Chordomas. Progr. Neurol. Surg. 1975;6:380–434.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksson B, Gunterberg B, Kindblom L-G. Chordoma: A Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Study of a Swedish National Series. Acta Orthop. 2009;52:49–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mirra JM. Bone Tumors. 1989.Google Scholar
  10. McMaster ML, Goldstein AM, Bromley CM, Ishibe N, Parry DM. Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973–1995. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:1–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wold LE, Laws ER. Cranial chordomas in children and young adults. J Neurosurg. 1983;59:1043–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson B, Gunterberg B, Kindblom LG. Chordoma. A clinicopathologic and prognostic study of a Swedish national series. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:49–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Heffelfinger MJ, Dahlin DC, MacCarty CS, Beabout JW. Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base. Cancer. 1973;32:410–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Nix WL, Steuber CP, Hawkins EP, Stenback WA, Pokorny WJ, Fernbach DJ. Sacrococcygeal chordoma in a neonate with multiple anomalies. J Pediatr. 1978;93:995–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sibley RK, Day DL, Dehner LP, Trueworthy RC. Metastasizing chordoma in early childhood: a pathological and immunohistochemical study with review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol. 1987;7:287–301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Borba LA, Al-Mefty O, Mrak RE, Suen J. Cranial chordomas in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:584–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Coffin CM, Swanson PE, Wick MR, Dehner LP. Chordoma in childhood and adolescence. A clinicopathologic analysis of 12 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993;117:927–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ridenour III RV, Ahrens WA, Folpe AL, Miller DV. Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Chordomas in Children and Young Adults. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2010;13:9–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Benk V, Liebsch NJ, Munzenrider JE, Efird J, McManus P, Suit H. Base of skull and cervical spine chordomas in children treated by high-dose irradiation. Radiation Oncology Biology. 1995;31:577–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoch BL, Nielsen GP, Liebsch NJ, Rosenberg AE. Base of skull chordomas in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:811–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Probst EN, Zanella FE, Vortmeyer AO. Congenital clivus chordoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:537–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mabrey RE. Chordoma: A Study of 150 Cases. Am J Cancer. 1935;25:501–17.Google Scholar
  23. Matsumoto J, Towbin RB, Ball WS. Cranial chordomas in infancy and childhood. A report of two cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;20:28–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolte K. Malignant intracranial chordoma and sarcoma of the clivus in infancy. Pediatr Radiol. 1979;8:1–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassin JF, Chutorian AM. Intracranial chordoma in children. Arch Neurol. 1967;17:89–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Occhipinti E, Mastrostefano R, Pompili A, Carapella CM, Caroli F, Riccio A. Spinal chordomas in infancy. Report of a case and analysis of the literature. Childs Brain. 1981;8:198–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Proyard G, Dony H. Chordoma of the cervical spine. Acta Chir Belg. 1965;64:132–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jain SP, Agrawal PK, Jain S, Pandey UC, Samuel KC, Sinha N. Chordoma presenting in the gluteal region in the child. Report of a rare case. Indian J Cancer. 1981;18:160–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tao Z-Z, Chen S-M, Liu J-F, Huang X-L, Zhou L. Paranasal sinuses chordoma in pediatric patient: A case report and literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:1415–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Berdal P, Myhre E. Cranial chordomas involving the paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol. 1964;78:906–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoneoka Y, Tsumanuma I, Fukuda M, Tamura T, Morii K, Tanaka R, et al. Cranial base chordoma – long term outcome and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:773–8.Google Scholar
  32. Dow GR, Robson DK, Jaspan T, Punt JAG. Intradural cerebellar chordoma in a child: a case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:188–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chang SW, Gore PA, Nakaji P, Rekate HL. Juvenile intradural chordoma: case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:E525–6. discussion E527.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Figueiredo E, Welling L, Teixeira M, Tavares W, Rosemberg S. Ectopic pineal chordoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:145.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kombogiorgas D, St George EJ, Chapman S, English M, Solanki GA. Infantile clivus chordoma without clivus involvement: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:1369–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Niida H, Tanaka R, Tamura T, Takeuchi S. Clival chordoma in early childhood without bone involvement. Childs Nerv Syst. 1994;10:533–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards AT, Stricke L, Spitz L. Sacrococcygeal chordomas in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1973;8:911–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cable DG, Moir C. Pediatric sacrococcygeal chordomas: a rare tumor to be differentiated from sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32:759–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Al-Adra D, Bennett A, Gill R, Lees G. Pediatric metastatic sacrococcygeal chordoma treated with surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011;21:196–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kozlowski K, Barylak A, Campbell J, Hoeffel JD, Beluffi G, Masel J, et al. Primary sacral bone tumours in children (report of 16 cases with a short literature review). Australas Radiol. 1990;34:142–9.Google Scholar
  41. Shinmura Y, Miura K, Yajima S, Tsutsui Y. Sacrococcygeal chordoma in infancy showing an aggressive clinical course: an autopsy case report. Pathol Int. 2003;53:473–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Higinbotham NL, Phillips RF, Farr HW, Hustu HO. Chordoma. Thirty-five-year study at Memorial Hospital. Cancer. 1967;20:1841–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellis VH. Notochordal tumour of the cauda equina in a child of 8 years. British Journal of Surgery. 1935;23:25–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Congdon CC. Benign and malignant chordomas; a clinico-anatomical study of twenty-two cases. Am J Pathol. 1952;28:793–821.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Huang S-M, Chen C-C, Chiu P-C, Lai P-H, Ho J-T, Tseng H-H. Unusual presentation of posterior mediastinal chordoma in a 2-year-old boy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:743–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Choi GH, Yang M-S, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, et al. Pediatric cervical chordoma: report of two cases and a review of the current literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26:835–40.Google Scholar
  47. Windeyer BW. Chordoma. Proc R Soc Med. 1959;52:1088–100.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Killampalli VV, Power D, Stirling AJ. Preadolescent presentation of a lumbar chordoma: results of vertebrectomy and fibula strut graft reconstruction at 8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:621–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Chambers PW, Schwinn CP. Chordoma. A clinicopathologic study of metastasis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;72:765–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaneko Y, Sato Y, Iwaki T, Shin RW, Tateishi J, Fukui M. Chordoma in early childhood: a clinicopathological study. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:442–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Plese JP, Borges JM, Nudelman M, Lefèvre AB, Sallum J. Unusual subarachnoid metastasis of an intracranial chordoma in infancy. Childs Brain. 1978;4:251–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Figueiredo EG, Tavares WM, Welling L, Rosemberg S, Teixeira MJ. Ectopic pineal chordoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:145.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen CN, Sekhar LN, Schramm VL, Janecka IP. Chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the cranial base: an 8-year experience. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:931–40. discussion 940–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Argaud R, Lestrade A. Sur La Précocité De Certains Chordomes sacrococcygiens. Bull. Acad. de méd. 1926;95:375–377. Google Scholar
  55. Garofalo E, Minerva A, Baltieri G. Sacrococcygeal chordoma in a 19-month-old boy. Minerva Pediatr. 1976;28:1909–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Worthy TS. Sacrococcygeal chordoma--two cases with unusual features. Clin Radiol. 1965;16:412–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Nakamura Y, Becker LE, Marks A. S100 protein in human chordoma and human and rabbit notochord. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1983;107:118–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Auger M, Raney B, Callender D, Eifel P, Ordóñez NG. Metastatic intracranial chordoma in a child with massive pulmonary tumor emboli. Pediatr Pathol. 1994;14:763–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lountzis NI, Hogarty MD, Kim HJ, Junkins-Hopkins JM. Cutaneous metastatic chordoma with concomitant tuberous sclerosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:S6–S10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Harvey W, Dawson E. Chordoma. Edinburgh Med J. 1941;48(2):713–735. Google Scholar
  61. Vujovic S, Henderson S, Presneau N, Odell E, Jacques TS, Tirabosco R, et al. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J Pathol. 2006;209:157–65.Google Scholar
  62. Stratt B, Steiner RM. The radiologic findings in posterior mediastinal chordoma. Skeletal Radiol. 1980;5:171–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Hallor KH, Staaf J, Jönsson G, Heidenblad M, Vult Von Steyern F, Bauer HCF, et al. Frequent deletion of the CDKN2A locus in chordoma: analysis of chromosomal imbalances using array comparative genomic hybridisation. Br J Cancer. 2007;98:434–42.Google Scholar
  64. Presneau N, Shalaby A, Ye H, Pillay N, Halai D, Idowu B, et al. Role of the transcription factor T (brachyury) in the pathogenesis of sporadic chordoma: a genetic and functional-based study. J Pathol. 2010;223:327–35.Google Scholar
  65. Shalaby A, Presneau N, Ye H, Halai D, Berisha F, Idowu B, et al. The role of epidermal growth factor receptor in chordoma pathogenesis: a potential therapeutic target. J Pathol. 2010;223:336–46.Google Scholar
  66. Tamborini E, Miselli F, Negri T, Lagonigro MS, Staurengo S, Dagrada GP, et al. Molecular and Biochemical Analyses of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor (PDGFR) B, PDGFRA, and KIT Receptors in Chordomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6920–8.Google Scholar
  67. Casali PG, Messina A, Stacchiotti S, Tamborini E, Crippa F, Gronchi A, et al. Imatinib mesylate in chordoma. Cancer. 2004;101:2086–97.Google Scholar
  68. Scheipl S, Froehlich EV, Leithner A, Beham A, Quehenberger F, Mokry M, et al. Does insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) targeting provide new treatment options for chordomas? A retrospective clinical and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology. 2012;60:999–1003.Google Scholar
  69. Klebs H. Ein Fall von Ecchondrosies-spheno-occipitalis amyllea. Virchows Arch. 1864;31:396–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. McMaster ML, Goldstein AM, Parry DM. Clinical features distinguish childhood chordoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) from chordoma in the general paediatric population. J Med Genet. 2011;48:444–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Meyer JE, Oot RF, Lindfors KK. CT appearance of clival chordomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:34–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ishida T, Dorfman HD. Chondroid chordoma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma of the base of the skull: can immunohistochemistry resolve the controversy? J Neurooncol. 1994;18:199–206.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Yadav R, Sharma MC, Malgulwar PB, Pathak P, Sigamani E, Suri V, et al. Prognostic value of MIB-1, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and INI1 in childhood chordomas. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16:372–81.Google Scholar
  74. Nishiguchi T, Mochizuki K, Tsujio T, Nishita T, Inoue Y. Lumbar vertebral chordoma arising from an intraosseous benign notochordal cell tumour: radiological findings and histopathological description with a good clinical outcome. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:e49–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Yamaguchi T, Suzuki S, Ishiiwa H, Shimizu K, Ueda Y. Benign notochordal cell tumors: A comparative histological study of benign notochordal cell tumors, classic chordomas, and notochordal vestiges of fetal intervertebral discs. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:756–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Oakley GJ, Fuhrer K, Seethala RR. Brachyury, SOX-9, and podoplanin, new markers in the skull base chordoma vs chondrosarcoma differential: a tissue microarray-based comparative analysis. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1461–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Foote RF, Ablin G, Hall WW. Chordoma in siblings. Calif Med. 1958;88:383–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Enin IP. Chordoma of the nasopharynx in 2 members of a family. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 1964;26:88–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kerr WA, Allen KL, Haynes DR, Sellars SL. Letter: Familial nasopharyngeal chordoma. S Afr Med J. 1975;49:1584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Chetty R, Levin CV, Kalan MR. Chordoma: a 20-year clinicopathologic review of the experience at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. J Surg Oncol. 1991;46:261–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Stepanek J, Cataldo SA, Ebersold MJ, Lindor NM, Jenkins RB, Unni K, et al. Familial chordoma with probable autosomal dominant inheritance. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75:335–6.Google Scholar
  82. Dalprà L, Malgara R, Miozzo M, Riva P, Volonte M, Larizza L, et al. First cytogenetic study of a recurrent familial chordoma of the clivus. Int J Cancer. 1999;81:24–30.Google Scholar
  83. Miozzo M, Dalprà L, Riva P, Volontà M, Macciardi F, Pericotti S, et al. A tumor suppressor locus in familial and sporadic chordoma maps to 1p36. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:68–72.Google Scholar
  84. Kelley MJ, Korczak JF, Sheridan E, Yang X, Goldstein AM, Parry DM. Familial Chordoma, a Tumor of Notochordal Remnants, Is Linked to Chromosome 7q33. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2001;69:454–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang XR, Ng D, Alcorta DA, Liebsch NJ, Sheridan E, Li S, et al. T (brachyury) gene duplication confers major susceptibility to familial chordoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1176–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Bhadra AK, Casey ATH. Familial chordoma. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:634–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Amendola BE, Amendola MA, Oliver E, McClatchey KD. Chordoma: role of radiation therapy. Radiology. 1986;158(3):839–843.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Berson AM, Castro JR, Petti P, Phillips TL, Gauger GE, Gutin P, et al. Charged particle irradiation of chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull and cervical spine: the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory experience. Radiation Oncology Biology. 1988;15:559–65.Google Scholar
  89. Taylor R, Elridge P, Errington R, Jones B, Punt J, Spooner D. Proton Therapy for Base of Skull Chordoma: A Report for the Royal College of Radiologists. Clin Oncol. 2000;12:75–9.Google Scholar
  90. Carpentier A, Polivka M, Blanquet A, Lot G, George B. Suboccipital and cervical chordomas: the value of aggressive treatment at first presentation of the disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:1070–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Lanzino G, Dumont AS, Lopes MB, Laws ER. Skull base chordomas: overview of disease, management options, and outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10:E12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Menezes AH. Craniovertebral junction neoplasms in the pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24:1173–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Kennedy JD, Haines SJ. Review of skull base surgery approaches: with special reference to pediatric patients. J Neurooncol. 1994;20:291–312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Tuite GF, Veres R, Crockard HA, Sell D. Pediatric transoral surgery: indications, complications, and long-term outcome. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:573–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Di Maio S, Yip S, Zhrani Al GA, Alotaibi FE, Turki Al A, Kong E, et al. Novel targeted therapies in chordoma: an update. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:873–83.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Tewfik HH, McGinnis WL, Nordstrom DG, Latourette HB. Chordoma: evaluation of clinical behavior and treatment modalities. Radiation Oncology Biology. 1977;2:959–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Reddy EK, Mansfield CM, Hartman GV. Chordoma. Radiation Oncology Biology. 1981;7:1709–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Pearlman AW, Friedman M. Radical radiation therapy of chordoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970;108:332–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Habrand JL, Bondiau PY, Dupuis O, Lévy-Piedbois C, Marin JL, Oberlin O. Late effects of radiotherapy in children. Cancer Radiother. 1997;1:810–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Habrand JL, Bolle S, Datchary J, Alapetite C, Petras S, Helfre S, et al. La protonthérapie en radiothérapie pédiatrique. Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2009;13:550–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Habrand J-L, Schneider R, Alapetite C, Feuvret L, Petras S, Datchary J, et al. Proton Therapy in Pediatric Skull Base and Cervical Canal Low-Grade Bone Malignancies. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2008;71:672–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Hug EB, Sweeney RA, Nurre PM, Holloway KC, Slater JD, Munzenrider JE. Proton radiotherapy in management of pediatric base of skull tumors. Radiation Oncology Biology. 2002;52:1017–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Rombi B, Ares C, Hug EB, Schneider R, Goitein G, Staab A, et al. Spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for pediatric chordoma and chondrosarcoma: clinical outcome of 26 patients treated at paul scherrer institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:578–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Rutz HP, Weber DC, Goitein G, Ares C, Bolsi A, Lomax AJ, et al. Postoperative spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma in children and adolescents: initial experience at paul scherrer institute. Radiation Oncology Biology. 2008;71:220–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Combs SE, Kessel KA, Herfarth K, Jensen A, Oertel S, Blattmann C, et al. Treatment of pediatric patients and young adults with particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT): establishment of workflow and initial clinical data. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:170.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Childs SK, Kozak KR, Friedmann AM, Yeap BY, Adams J, MacDonald SM, et al. Proton radiotherapy for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical outcomes and late effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:635–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Dhall G, Traverso M, Finlay JL, Shane L, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Jubran R. The role of chemotherapy in pediatric clival chordomas. J Neurooncol. 2010;103:657–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Brooks M, Kleefield J, O'Reilly GV, Haykal HA, MacLeod M. Thoracic chordoma with unusual radiographic features. Comput Radiol. 1987;11:85–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Scimeca PG, James-Herry AG, Black KS, Kahn E, Weinblatt ME. Chemotherapeutic treatment of malignant chordoma in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1996;18:237–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Fleming GF, Heimann PS, Stephens JK, Simon MA, Ferguson MK, Benjamin RS, et al. Dedifferentiated chordoma. Response to aggressive chemotherapy in two cases. Cancer. 1993;72:714–8.Google Scholar
  111. Al-Rahawan MM, Siebert JD, Mitchell CS, Smith SD. Durable complete response to chemotherapy in an infant with a clival chordoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;59:323–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Stacchiotti S, Marrari A, Tamborini E, Palassini E, Virdis E, Messina A, et al. Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1886–94.Google Scholar
  113. Geoerger B, Morland B, Ndiaye A, Doz F, Kalifa G, Geoffray A, et al. Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer European Consortium: <?show [?A3B2 show $6#?]?>Target-driven exploratory study of imatinib mesylate in children with solid malignancies by the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer (ITCC) European Consortium. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2342–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Hof H, Welzel T, Debus J. Effectiveness of cetuximab/gefitinib in the therapy of a sacral chordoma. Onkologie. 2006;29:572–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. O'Connell JX, Renard LG, Liebsch NJ, Efird JT, Munzenrider JE, Rosenberg AE. Base of skull chordoma. A correlative study of histologic and clinical features of 62 cases. Cancer. 1994;74:2261–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Mitchell A, Scheithauer BW, Unni KK, Forsyth PJ, Wold LE, McGivney DJ. Chordoma and chondroid neoplasms of the spheno-occiput. An immunohistochemical study of 41 cases with prognostic and nosologic implications. Cancer. 1993;72:2943–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Coffin CM, Swanson PE, Wick MR, Dehner LP. An immunohistochemical comparison of chordoma with renal cell carcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, and myxopapillary ependymoma: a potential diagnostic dilemma in the diminutive biopsy. Mod Pathol. 1993;6:531–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Yadav YR, Kak VK, Khosla VK, Khandelwal N, Radotra BD. Cranial chordoma in the first decade. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1992;94:241–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Beccaria et al. 2015

Advertisement