Skip to content

Advertisement

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Open Access

Genomic screening of testicular germ cell tumors from monozygotic twins

  • Sara Martoreli Silveira1,
  • Isabela Werneck da Cunha2,
  • Fabio Albuquerque Marchi3,
  • Ariane Fidelis Busso1,
  • Ademar Lopes4 and
  • Silvia Regina Rogatto1, 5Email author
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20149:181

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0181-x

Received: 30 April 2014

Accepted: 4 November 2014

Published: 26 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) account for 1-2% of all tumors in young and middle aged men. A 75-fold increase in TCGT development has been reported for monozygotic (MZ) twins. Therefore, the occurrence of simultaneous tumors in MZ twins emphasizes the importance of genetic factors that influence the risk of developing these tumors. Genomic screening was performed for one family containing MZ twins with testicular germ cell tumors, in order to define alterations associated with risk of tumor development.

Methods

Copy number alterations were evaluated using array-CGH (4x44K, Agilent Technologies) in one seminoma and one embryonal carcinoma (EC) from MZ twins. In addition, genomic alterations from the tumors and peripheral blood cells of the twins were compared to the parental genomes via their peripheral blood cells.

Results

Embryonal carcinoma (Twin-1 t) presented a lower frequency of genomic alterations compared to the seminoma (Twin-2 t). One minimal common region of loss was observed in 9p13.1-p12 in the comparison between DNA from blood samples for Twin-1 and Twin-2. In this region is mapped the CNTNAP3 gene which was confirmed as involved in losses by qPCR. Comparative analysis of novel CNVs between the Twin-1 t and Twin-2 t showed five minimal common regions involving gain at chromosomes 12 (12p12.3-p11.1 and 12p13.33-p12.3), while losses were observed at 10p15.3-p15.2, 13q21.1-q21.2 and 15q11.1-q11.2. In addition, one exclusive rare copy number alteration was detected in Twin-1 t and Twin-2 t, and 19 novel alterations were identified in the Twin-2 t.

Conclusion

Distinct genomic profiles for MZ twins with phenotypically different TGCT were described. Of particular interest, 12p gains were detected exclusively in tumor samples. In peripheral blood samples, loss of 9p13.1-p12 was the unique novel CNV shared by the twins, confirming the involvement of CNTNAP3 gene in TGCTs development. Although similar CNV profiles were shared by both the peripheral blood and tumor samples of the twins, tumor-specific CNV loci were identified for seminoma and non-seminomatous tumors. These findings suggest the presence of de novo germline structural alterations and TGCT predisposition.

Keywords

Testicular germ cell tumorsSeminomasEmbryonal carcinomaArray-based comparative genomic hybridizationMolecular markersGenomic imbalancesCopy number variations

Background

Testicular tumors are relatively uncommon, accounting for 1-2% of all tumors in males. Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) represent 95% of testicular cancers and are histologically classified as seminoma or non-seminoma [1]. Seminoma presents a homogenous histological pattern that resembles primordial germ cells (PGCs) [2]. Non-seminomatous tumors are classified as embryonic (teratoma) and extra-embryonic (yolk sac and choriocarcinoma) according to their pattern of cell differentiation, or as embryonal cell carcinomas when originating from undifferentiated cells [3],[4]. It is important to highlight that non-seminomatous mixed germ cell tumors display a more aggressive clinical behavior, frequently developing local recurrence and distant metastasis [5].

The presence of these tumors in monozygotic (MZ) twins is extremely rare and therefore, it is difficult to assess the impact and risk associated with inheritance. Monozygotic and dizygotic twins present a 75 and 35-fold increased risk of developing TCGT, respectively [6]. In a meta-analysis of testicular cancer in twins, two of seven studies demonstrated a significantly increased risk of testicular cancer among twins [7]. Therefore, a simultaneous occurrence of tumors in MZ twins stresses the importance of a genetic factor, which influences their risk of development.

The etiology of testicular cancer is not completely understood, however, a number of risk factors have been described in the literature, including cryptorchidism, a family history of testicular cancer, testicular atrophy, testicular microlithiasis, infertility, HIV infection and imbalance of estrogen and androgen levels in twin pregnancies [8]-[11]. In addition, rare inherited diseases, such as Down’s syndrome, Klinefelter’s syndrome, and XY dysgenesis, are associated with an increased risk for testicular cancer [12]. Gains at Xq27, XRCC1 polymorphisms and deletions of the Y chromosome have been described as associated with susceptibility to testicular germ cell tumor [13]-[17]. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 29 SNPs mapped at 18 TGCT predisposition loci [18]-[22]. Several genes have been described as associated with TGCT susceptibility including TERT, SPRY4, BAK1, DMRT1, ATF7IP and KITLG.

In the present study, a genomic screening approach was performed for a pair of 26-year old male MZ twins with embryonal carcinoma and testicular seminoma. Copy number variations (CNV) analyses were presented and discussed with reference to the parental genome, which allowed for the assessment of genomic alterations and respective harbored genes involved in the development of the testicular germ cell tumors.

Methods

Case description

A pair of male MZ twins with a diagnosis of TGCTs was admitted to the Sarcoma’s Nucleus of the A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil. Array-CGH analysis was successfully performed for the primary tumors (embryonal carcinoma and seminoma) and the peripheral blood samples from the twins and their parents. Neither patient had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to sample collection. Furthermore, neither twin presented risk factors associated with TCGT as described in the literature (cryptorchidism, familial testicular cancer history, testicular atrophy, testicular microlithiasis, infertility, HIV infection and alterations of estrogen and androgen levels during pregnancy). All family members were advised of the procedures and provided written informed consent. The Human Research Ethics Committee of the Institution approved the study (Protocol EC 21/2014).

Twin-1 was submitted to a right orchiectomy after presenting with a palpable tumor in the right testicle at 21 years of age. Histopathological analysis revealed a mixed germ cell tumor (pT2NxMx) containing both embryonal carcinoma (95%) and mature teratoma (5%) components (Figure 1A-B). Immunohistochemistry for the embryonal carcinoma was positive for CD30 and negative for PLAP, HCG and alpha- fetoprotein. Despite the presence of lymphatic and venous invasion, the adjacent testicular anatomy (tunica albuginea and vaginalis) was not compromised and no invasion of the spermatic cord was observed. The surgical margins were negative for the presence of tumor cells. Due to the presence of pulmonary metastases, the patient underwent a three-day regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP), with a complete response. Three years after the initial diagnosis, a new nodule was detected in the left testicle. Histopathological evaluation revealed a mature teratoma, clinical stage IA. Subsequently, the patient had a left orchiectomy and after 6 years of follow-up remains disease-free.
Figure 1

Identical twins diagnosed with different subtypes of testicular germ cell tumors. A) Embryonal carcinoma. B) Embryonal carcinoma in detail, showing a papillary growth pattern. C) Seminoma nodule within the testis D) Seminoma in detail, showing large round cells with lymphocytes.

Twin-2 was submitted to a right orchiectomy at 22 years of age, after presenting with a palpable tumor in the right testicle. Histopathological analyses revealed a pure classical seminoma (pT1NxMx) (Figure 1C-D) with no vascular or lymphatic invasion. The adjacent testicular anatomy (rete testis, epididymis, tunica albuginea, tunica vaginalis and spermatic cord) was not compromised. It was pathologically staged as 1A, indicated a good prognosis; therefore no adjuvant treatment was required. Fifteen months later, testicular ultrasound detected a new solid nodule in the left testicle measuring 0.5 cm, associated with microlithiasis, diagnosed as a classic seminoma, without any other germ cell component. The patient underwent wedge resection of the tumor nodule and adjuvant radiotherapy (25.5 Gy) was administered to the remaining testis. After four years of follow-up, the patient remains disease-free.

Genome screening using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array- CGH)

Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tumors, one embryonal carcinoma (Twin-1 t) and one seminoma (Twin-2 t), were macro-dissected and genomic DNA extracted using a standard phenol/chloroform method. The same protocol was applied for DNA extraction from peripheral blood from the twins and their parents. The Peripheral blood samples, tumors and reference genomic DNA (Promega, G1471, male) were differentially labeled using a Genomic DNA Enzymatic Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Hybridization was performed using Agilent Human CGH 44 K Oligo Microarrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The array images were acquired using a DNA microarray scanner with Surescan High- Resolution Technology (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and Scan Control (version 8.1, Agilent Technologies) software. The data were extracted and normalized using the Feature Extraction software (version 10.1.1.1, Agilent Technologies). Statistical analysis was performed using the Nexus Copy Number software (version 7.5 – Hg19, Biodiscovery Inc., El Segundo, CA, USA). The Fast Adaptive States Segmentation Technique 2 (FASST2) algorithm and Significance Testing for Aberrant Copy number (STAC) statistical methods were used to identify non-random genomic copy-number alterations [23]. According to these algorithms, DNA copy number alteration was defined as follows: exceeding the significance threshold of 1×10−5; containing at least three consecutive altered probes per segment; and specified 1000 kb as being the maximum spacing between adjacent probes. These parameters were used to define the values for copy number gains (log2 ≥ 0.2), high copy number gains (log2 ≥ 0.6), losses (log2 ≤ −0.2) and homozygous losses (log2 ≤ −1.0).

Copy number variation analyses

The altered genomic regions observed were initially compared with the CNV described in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) (http://dgvbeta.tcag.ca/dgv/app/home?ref=GRCh37/hg19/, November 2013) and then with a CNV reference obtained from a database of the Brazilian population [24]. The CNVs were subsequently classified according to their genomic size and polymorphic frequency as follows: common (regions larger than 100 kb and often present in DGV frequencies greater than or equal to 1%); rare (regions larger than 100 kb and often present in DGV frequencies less than or equal to 1%); and novel (regions larger than 100 kb and not yet described in the DGV). This study focused only on rare or novel CNVs. Despite the majority of the CNV described in this study having a partial intersection with the common regions identified in the DGV database, the total CNV length had not yet been described in either the DGV or the Brazilian database. In addition, only genes mapped in these regions not covered by common CNVs were considered.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis

The genomic DNA sequences of candidate region were obtained from the Ensembl Genome Browser website (GRCh37/hg19 Human Reference Assembly; February 2009). The reactions were performed in triplicate and followed PCR cycling conditions as previously described by [25]. Briefly, primer pair of CNTNAP3 gene (covering the same probes represented in the 4x44K Agilent plataform) was designed to amplify the altered regions detected by using array-CGH (Forward: TCCAGACAGATGAGCAAAACATA; Reverse: AGAAAGAAAGACAACTCTCTGCT). Delta-delta Ct model was used to calculated the relative copy numbers [26] based on the CNTNAP3/HPRT (reference gene) ratio. This value was defined as a loss when the ratio was <0.68 and as a gain when the ratio was >1.47.

Results and discussion

There is a strong hereditary component in testicular germ cell tumors as demonstrated by twin studies [6],[7],[27],[28]. Over the past 10 years, pertinent advances have been reported in MZ twin CNV studies, revealing an association with disease susceptibility, including neurological disorders (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson disease and Lewy body dementia) and psychiatric disorders (autism, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia) [29]-[32]. The present study is thought to be the first report demonstrating the novel and rare CNV profiles of a pair of MZ twins with different testicular germ cell tumor phenotypes. The study design was used for both the peripheral blood samples from the twins and their parents as well as the tumors (seminoma and embryonal carcinoma) from twins.

Comparison between constitutional CNVs from parents and siblings

The array-CGH profiles obtained from the genomic DNA of the peripheral blood from the father (Parent-1) and the mother (Parent-2) were compared to their sons (Twin-1b and Twin-2b). Parents and siblings shared similar patterns in terms of common CNVs. Rare or novel CNVs were not detected during these comparisons, most likely due to the low resolution of the platform. The peripheral blood samples from the MZ twins presented a discordant genotype profile, suggesting the contribution of post- zygotic events. The differences in genetic profiles of MZ twins has been previously characterized according to alterations involving the number or morphology of chromosomes, chromosomal mosaicism, single nucleotide polymorphisms and epigenetic modifications [33]. In this study, a panel of potentially pathogenic and novel CNVs was identified by array-CGH in each twin (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Significant copy number variation (CNVs) regions detected by array-CGH

Cytoband #

Samples

Start

Stop

Length (pb)

Event

Gene ID

Blood

Tumor

9p12-p13.1

Twin-1b

 

38.944.256

40.498.819

1554563

Loss

7

CNTNAP3, SPATA31A1, SPATA31A2, ZNF658B, LOC653501, DQ586551 and CNTNAP3B

Twin-2b

10p15.3-p15.2

 

Twin-1 t

1,056,859

3,168,906

2112047

Loss

18

ADARB2, ADARB2-AS1, AK097474, AK127347, AX748285, IDI1, IDI2, IDI2-AS1, PFKP, WDR37*

Twin-2 t

12p12.3-p11.1

 

Twin-1 t

15.161.204

34.278.525

19117321

Gain

126

PLCZ1, CAPZA3, CASC1, KRAS, ASUN, PPFIBP1, DDX11, MANSC4, KLHL42, PTHLH*

Twin-2 t

12p13.33- p12.3

 

Twin-1 t

0

14.900.955

14900955

Gain

351

ACRBP, AKAP3, CCND2, DDX47, LRP6, NANOG, YBX3, CACNA1C, FGF6, FKBP4*

Twin-2 t

13q21.1-q21.2

 

Twin-1 t

58.321.428

60.493.818

2172390

Loss

6

AK097816, BC032915, CR618830, DIAPH3, TDRD3 and DIAP3

Twin-2 t

15q11.1-q11.2

 

Twin-1 t

20.335.887

23.044.681

2708794

Loss

140

SNORD116I, SNORD115, SNORD107, SNORD64, MAGEL2, NDN, SNURF, PAR-SN, PAR5, SNORD108*

Twin-2 t

Xq27.3

Twin-2b

Twin-2 t

144.344.622

145.204.327

859.706

Gain

9

SLITRK2, TMEM257, MIR892C, MIR890, MIR888, MIR892A, MIR892B, MIR891B and MIR891A

Xq28

Twin-1b

Twin-1 t

150.522.209

153.914.671

3.392.463

Gain

7

MAGEA2, MAGEA2B, FATE1, LAGE3, CTAG1B, CTAG1A and CTAG2

Legend: #: It was found only novel CNVs in the blood and tumor samples from monozygotic twins (DGV and Brazilian Database). *More than 10 genes were mapped in this representative chromosome region. The complete gene list is deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Accession number: GSE62779.

Table 2

Specific rare and novel CNVs detected in embryonal carcinoma (Twin-1t) and seminoma (Twin-2t)

Tumor Sample

Cytoband

Start (pb)

Stop (pb)

Size (pb)

Event

CNV Classification a

Genes b

Twin-1 t

16p11.2-p11.1

34.059.589

34.847.384

787796

Gain

R

NI

Twin-2 t

1p31.1

77.762.182

78.226.565

464384

Gain

N

NI

 

1p22.1

93.075.850

93.586.348

510499

Gain

N

NI

 

2p23.3

27.431.951

27.496.511

64561

Gain

N

EIF2B4

 

2q33.1

201.865.021

202.014.428

149408

Gain

N

NI

 

3q13.13

110.529.591

110.874.657

345067

Loss

N

NI

 

3q13.33

120.713.729

120.813.244

99516

Gain

N

NI

 

6p21.1

42.257.603

42.545.298

287696

Gain

N

GUCA1A,GUCA1B, MRPS10 and TRERF1

 

8p11.23

39.003.502

39.157.973

154472

Loss

N

ADAM9 and ADAM32

 

10q24.1-q24.2

99.386.286

99.516.551

130266

Gain

N

PI4K2A, AVPI1, MARVELD1, ZFYVE27 and SFRP5

 

12q13.3-q14.1

56.296.387

56.308.803

12417

Loss

N

NI

 

12q24.31

119.381.319

119.652.493

271175

Gain

N

NI

 

14q11.2

20.550.697

20.622.417

71721

Loss

N

NI

 

14q23.1

58.887.110

59.149.379

262270

Loss

N

NI

 

15q25.3-q26.1

86.730.625

86.986.408

255784

Gain

N

MRPL46, MRPS11, DET1, MIR1179, MIR7-2, MIR3529, AEN and ISG20

 

17p11.2

19.968.313

20.108.133

139821

Loss

N

NI

 

17p13.1

7.423.749

7.459.204

35456

Gain

N

NI

 

19q13.43

62.712.083

62.882.866

170784

Gain

N

ZNF773, ZNF549, ZNF550, ZNF416, ZIK1, ZNF530, ZNF134, ZNF211 and ZSCAN4

 

20q11.21

29.352.138

29.447.677

95540

Gain

N

DEFB116, DEFB118 and DEFB119

 

Xp22.12-p22.11

20.043.034

21.803.101

1760068

Gain

R

SCARNA9L, SMPX, YY2 and MBTPS2

Legend: CNV – copy number variation; Twin-1 t – embryonal carcinoma; Twin-2 t – seminoma. Rare – R; Novel – N; No identified – NI. a - CNV classification based on the Database of Genomic Variants and in the Brazilian population reference database. b- Genes mapped in regions described as rare or novel CNV.

Comparison between the genomic profiles of the blood and tumor from Twin-1

The comparison between the genomic alterations found in the peripheral blood and tumor samples from Twin-1 revealed the presence of minimal regions of gain at Xq28. The Xq28 locus harbored seven genes (MAGEA2, MAGEA2B, FATE1, LAGE3, CTAG1B, CTAG1A and CTAG2), three of which are responsible for encoding the cancer-testis antigens CTAG1B, CTAG1A and CTAG2. The cancer-testis antigens (CTA) are highly expressed in normal germ line cells as well as in many cancers, where they are associated with advanced disease and a poor prognosis [34],[35]. Several studies have demonstrated that CTA production in tumor cells occurs due to reactivation of the gametogenic expression program as result of genomic instability [35]-[37]. In the present study, gains of Xq28 CTA-cluster in embryonal carcinoma and blood samples obtained from Twin-1 were identified. This cluster was not observed for the seminomatous from Twin-2.

Comparison between the genomic profile in blood and tumor from Twin-2

The peripheral blood and tumor samples from Twin-2 shared novel CNV involving gains at Xq27.3. This CNV was not detected in embryonal carcinoma from Twin-1. Nine genes were mapped on Xq27.3, including six miRNAs (miR890, miR888, miR891A, miR891B, miR892A and miR892B). miR890 and miR888 have previously been described as body fluid-specific, only detected in semen and epididymal tissue [38]. However, no association has been described for TGCT. Although these findings are interesting, further studies are required in order to confirm that the alterations involving these miRNAs are associated with risk of developing TGCT.

Comparison between the peripheral blood samples from Twin-1 and Twin-2

Although 9p12-p13.1 losses were covered by common CNVs, the region remained included for analysis due to its presence in blood of Twin-1 and Twin-2 (Figure 2). In addition, this region harbors potential candidate genes that have been previously described in TGCT. Seven genes were mapped in this region, including two members of the SPATA31 (AEP1) subfamily (SPATA31A1 and SPATA31A2) and CNTNAP3. The SPATA31 testis-specific gene codified an integral component of membrane that has been associated to spermatogenesis and the cell differentiation process, possibly playing a role in acrosome formation [39],[40]. CNTNAP3 gene encodes a protein associated to cell-recognition process within the nervous system [41]. Although no significant by the criteria used in our study, loss of CNTNAP3 was detected by array-CGH in both tumor samples from twins (two consecutive probes). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed to confirm the loss at 9p13.1-p12 involving the CNTNAP3 gene. Relative DNA copy number loss was found in both, blood and tumor (homozygous deletion) from twins (Figure 2). The controls and parental blood samples showed relative DNA copy number within the reference interval. The qPCR analysis confirmed the array-CGH results as well as the homozygous deletions found in tumor samples. Overall, these data suggest that the genes mapped on 9p12-13.1 have a strong potential to be involved in testicular tumor development.
Figure 2

Array-CGH profile showing loss at 9p13.1-p12 was confirmed by qPCR for CNTNAP3 gene. (A-B) 9p13.1-p12 loss was the unique novel CNV shared by the Twin-1 (A) and Twin-2 (B). Scatter plots with x-axis coordinate representing the probes positions along the genome. The low bars (red) indicate losses of genomic regions. The images were adapted from the Nexus 7.5 software. (C) Relative quantification of CNTNAP3 copy number alterations evaluated by qPCR. Normal DNA copy number (two copies) was found in the controls and parental blood. Losses were found in peripheral blood and tumor cells from twins. Image obtained from Graphpad Prism 5 (Graphpad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA).

Panel of novel CNVs shared by seminoma and embryonial carcinoma

The presence of rare or novel CNVs detected in seminoma and embryonal carcinoma suggests a common mechanism that contributes to tumorigenesis. Comparative analysis of novel CNVs from the embryonal carcinoma and seminoma revealed five minimal common regions, involving gain at chromosome 12 (12p12.3-p11.1 and 12p13.33-p12.3), while losses were observed at 10p15.3-p15.2, 13q21.1-q21.2 and 15q11.1-q11.2 (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Schematic representation of the genomic alterations detected in peripheral blood cells (b) and tumors (t) from the parents and twins. In peripheral blood, loss of 9p13.1-p12 was the unique novel CNV shared by the twins. Two specific CNVs mapped in chromosome X were shared by both tumor and blood samples of each sibling, including Xq28 for Twin-1 and Xq27.3 for Twin-2. The panel of novel CNVs shared by embryonal carcinoma (Twin-1 t) and the seminoma (Twin-2 t), including gains at 12p (12p12.3-p11.1 and 12p13.33-p12.3), as well as losses at 10p15.3-p15.2, 13q21.1-q21.2 and 15q11.1-q11.2. None of these novel CNVs were shared with the parental genotypes.

DNA copy number alterations involving 12p have been described in both seminoma and non-seminoma. Amplification of 12p, as observed in the tumor samples from Twin-1 and Twin2 (Additional file 1), was first described by Atkin et al. [42], and subsequently in other studies [43]-[46]. Gains of 12p have been detected in primordial cells responsible for determining intratubular germ cell neoplasia of the unclassified type, suggesting that possession of this alteration contributes to an invasive phenotype [47]-[49]. Several candidate target genes have been mapped to this region, including KRAS and CCND2, which have been associated with the malignant transformation process via the activation of pathways involved in cell proliferation [48],[50], or in the maintenance of germ cell pluripotency, such as DPPA3 and NANOG [46],[51]. Furthermore, we identified several spermatogenesis-associated genes mapped in 12p12.3-p11.1 and 12p13.33-p12.3 including ACRBP, AKAP3, DDX47, PLCZ1, CAPZA3, ASUN and DDX11.

Eighteen genes mapped at deleted region 10p15.3-p15.2 including PFKP, ADARB2 and WDR37. In agreement with our findings, Hofer et al. [52] reported PFKP down-expression among 55 differently expressed genes in seminomas and embryonal carcinomas. A high incidence of 13q deletion has been reported in primary TGCTs [43],[44],[53] and in non-seminomatous germ cell tumours with acquired treatment resistance [53]. In our study, it was detected losses of 13q21.1-q21.2, which harbors seven genes, including DIAPH3, TDRD3 and DIAP3. Loss of 15q11.1-q11.2 was also observed for both tumors, and involved the SNORD small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) cluster. The SNORD116I and SNORD115 genes belong to the C/D box family of snoRNAs, and present a number of important regulatory RNA editing functions. Further studies are necessary to clarify the involvement of these small RNAs on the development of TGCT.

Panel of the rare and novel tumor-specific CNVs

The comparative analysis of seminoma and embryonal carcinoma obtained from MZ twins revealed a panel of two rare and 19 novel tumor-specific CNVs (Table 2). To our knowledge, four studies evaluated copy number variations in TGCT [54]-[57]. Using array-CGH, Edsgärd et al. [54] analyzed the profile of pathologic CNVs in families with germ cell tumors, including TGCT. However, only common variants were identified, including heterozygous deletion involving RLN1 (9p24.1). Subsequently the authors had evaluated common and rare CNVs in a TGCC case–control cohort, but no single locus was found to be associated with these tumors. Instead, the authors described one potential deletion of PTPN1 gene (mapped at 20q13) as rare CNVs [55]. Stadler et al. [56] described three de novo CNV events involving amplification of 7q11.22 and 12q24.1, and loss of 6p21.2 in 3/43 familial testicular germ cell tumor trios evaluated. In a cohort of 212 cases of TGCT and 437 controls, Dalgaard et al. [57] reported a weak association for rare CNV in relation to cell migration in TGCT. These altered-locus or genes were not detected in our analysis. In agreement to the previous studies, our data suggest an association between several de novo germline structural aberrations and TGCT predisposition rather than one rare event influencing the phenotype.

Conclusion

This study constitutes the first report describing rare and novel CNVs of TGCT in monozygotic twins with divergent genomic profiles. Several CNV regions that harbor crucial regulatory genes were associated with TGCT pathogenesis. Loss of CNTNAP3 mapped at 9p13.1-p12 was confirmed as involved in TGCT development. Of particular importance, a pathognomonic gain of 12p was confirmed exclusively in tumor samples, which was not observed in the peripheral blood of the twins or their parents. Although similar CNV profiles were shared by for both the peripheral blood and tumor samples of the twins, tumor-specific CNV loci were identified for seminoma and non- seminomatous tumors, which suggest a CNV origin for de novo events.

Availability of supporting data

The data set supporting the results of this article is available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Accession number: GSE62779.

Additional file

Abbreviations

TGCT: 

Testicular germ cell tumors

CNV: 

Copy number variation

MZ: 

Monozygotic twins

EC: 

Embryonal carcinoma

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Dr Luciane Regina Cavalli for critically reading this manuscript, Dr Mateus de Camargo Barros and Graziela Spilborgs for their support in qPCR experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the FAPESP and CNPq.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neogene Laboratory, CIPE, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
(2)
Department of Pathology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
(3)
Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, Inter-Institutional Program on Bioinformatics, USP, São Paulo, Brazil
(4)
Nucleus of Sarcoma, Department of Pelvic Surgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
(5)
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

References

  1. Walsh TJ, Grady RW, Porter MP, Lin DW, Weiss NS: Incidence of testicular germ cell cancers in U.S. children: SEER program experience 1973 to 2000. Urology. 2006, 68: 402-405. 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.045. discussion 405View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chieffi P, Chieffi S: Molecular biomarkers as potential targets for therapeutic strategies in human testicular germ cell tumors: an overview. J Cell Physiol. 2013, 228: 1641-1646. 10.1002/jcp.24328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ulbright TM: Germ cell neoplasms of the testis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993, 17: 1075-1091. 10.1097/00000478-199311000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Viatori M: Testicular cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012, 28: 180-189. 10.1016/j.soncn.2012.05.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mohamed GH, Gelfond JA, Nicolas MM, Brand TC, Sarvis JA, Leach RJ, Johnson-Pais TL: Genomic characterization of testis cancer: association of alterations with outcome of clinical stage 1 mixed germ cell nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis. Urology. 2012, 80: e481-e485. 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.026. 485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hemminki K, Li X: Familial risk in testicular cancer as a clue to a heritable and environmental aetiology. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90: 1765-1770. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601714.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Neale RE, Carrière P, Murphy MF, Baade PD: Testicular cancer in twins: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 171-173. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieckmann KP, Endsin G, Pichlmeier U: How valid is the prenatal estrogen excess hypothesis of testicular germ cell cancer? A case control study on hormone-related factors. Eur Urol. 2001, 40: 677-683. 10.1159/000049857. discussion 684View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Richiardi L, Akre O, Lambe M, Granath F, Montgomery SM, Ekbom A: Birth order, sibship size, and risk for germ-cell testicular cancer. Epidemiology. 2004, 15: 323-329. 10.1097/01.ede.0000120043.45185.7e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Raman JD, Nobert CF, Goldstein M: Increased incidence of testicular cancer in men presenting with infertility and abnormal semen analysis. J Urol. 2005, 174: 1819-1822. 10.1097/01.ju.0000177491.98461.aa. discussion 1822View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Walsh TJ, Croughan MS, Schembri M, Chan JM, Turek PJ: Increased risk of testicular germ cell cancer among infertile men. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 351-356. 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.562.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lutke Holzik MF, Sijmons RH, Sleijfer DT, Sonneveld DJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, van Echten-Arends J, Hoekstra HJ: Syndromic aspects of testicular carcinoma. Cancer. 2003, 97: 984-992. 10.1002/cncr.11155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crockford GP, Linger R, Hockley S, Dudakia D, Johnson L, Huddart R, Tucker K, Friedlander M, Phillips KA, Hogg D, Jewett MA, Lohynska R, Daugaard G, Richard S, Chompret A, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Heidenreich A, Albers P, Olah E, Geczi L, Bodrogi I, Ormiston WJ, Daly PA, Guilford P, Fosså SD, Heimdal K, Tjulandin SA, Liubchenko L, Stoll H, Weber W, et al: Genome-wide linkage screen for testicular germ cell tumour susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2006, 15: 443-451. 10.1093/hmg/ddi459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nathanson KL, Kanetsky PA, Hawes R, Vaughn DJ, Letrero R, Tucker K, Friedlander M, Phillips KA, Hogg D, Jewett MA, Lohynska R, Daugaard G, Richard S, Chompret A, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Heidenreich A, Olah E, Geczi L, Bodrogi I, Ormiston WJ, Daly PA, Oosterhuis JW, Gillis AJ, Looijenga LH, Guilford P, Fosså SD, Heimdal K, Tjulandin SA, Liubchenko L, Stoll H, et al: The Y deletion gr/gr and susceptibility to testicular germ cell tumor. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77: 1034-1043. 10.1086/498455.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsuchiya N, Mishina M, Narita S, Kumazawa T, Inoue T, Horikawa Y, Kakinuma H, Yuasa T, Matsuura S, Satoh S, Ogawa O, Habuchi T: Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms with the susceptibility and chromosomal aberration of testicular germ cell tumors. Int J Oncol. 2006, 28: 1217-1223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Houldsworth J, Korkola JE, Bosl GJ, Chaganti RS: Biology and genetics of adult male germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 5512-5518. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu WH, Zhang C, Zhao WM, Li CM, Xiu YC, Ni SB, Ren MH, Sun DJ: Mutational analysis of proto-oncogene Dbl on Xq27 in testicular germ cell tumors reveals a rare SNP in a patient with bilateral undescended testis. World J Urol. 2009, 27: 811-815. 10.1007/s00345-009-0408-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanetsky PA, Mitra N, Vardhanabhuti S, Li M, Vaughn DJ, Letrero R, Ciosek SL, Doody DR, Smith LM, Weaver J, Albano A, Chen C, Starr JR, Rader DJ, Godwin AK, Reilly MP, Hakonarson H, Schwartz SM, Nathanson KL: Common variation in KITLG and at 5q31.3 predisposes to testicular germ cell cancer. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 811-815. 10.1038/ng.393.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Rapley EA, Turnbull C, Al Olama AA, Dermitzakis ET, Linger R, Huddart RA, Renwick A, Hughes D, Hines S, Seal S, Morrison J, Nsengimana J, Deloukas P, Testicular Cancer Collaboration UK, Rahman N, Bishop DT, Easton DF, Stratton MR: A genome-wide association study of testicular germ cell tumor. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 807-810. 10.1038/ng.394.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Chung CC, Kanetsky PA, Wang Z, Hildebrandt MA, Koster R, Skotheim RI, Kratz CP, Turnbull C, Cortessis VK, Bakken AC, Bishop DT, Cook MB, Erickson RL, Fosså SD, Jacobs KB, Korde LA, Kraggerud SM, Lothe RA, Loud JT, Rahman N, Skinner EC, Thomas DC, Wu X, Yeager M, Schumacher FR, Greene MH, Schwartz SM, McGlynn KA, Chanock SJ, Nathanson KL: Meta-analysis identifies four new loci associated with testicular germ cell tumor. Nat Genet. 2013, 45: 680-685. 10.1038/ng.2634.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruark E, Seal S, McDonald H, Zhang F, Elliot A, Lau K, Perdeaux E, Rapley E, Eeles R, Peto J, Kote-Jarai Z, Muir K, Nsengimana J, Shipley J: Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for testicular cancer, including variants near DAZL and PRDM14. Nat Genet. 2013, 45: 686-689. 10.1038/ng.2635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Turnbull C, Rahman N: Genome-wide association studies provide new insights into the genetic basis of testicular germ-cell tumour. Int J Androl. 2011, 34: e86-e96. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01162.x. discussion e96-87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Diskin SJ, Eck T, Greshock J, Mosse YP, Naylor T, Stoeckert CJ, Weber BL, Maris JM, Grant GR: STAC: A method for testing the significance of DNA copy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1149-1158. 10.1101/gr.5076506.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Krepischi AC, Pearson PL, Rosenberg C: Germline copy number variations and cancer predisposition. Future Oncol. 2012, 8: 441-450. 10.2217/fon.12.34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Silveira SM, Villacis RAR, Marchi FA, Barros–Filho MC, Drigo AS, Scapulatempo C, Lopes A, Cunha IW, Rogatto SR: Genomic signatures predict poor outcome in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas and Leiomyosarcomas. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e67643-10.1371/journal.pone.0067643.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Swerdlow AJ, De Stavola BL, Swanwick MA, Maconochie NE: Risks of breast and testicular cancers in young adult twins in England and Wales: evidence on prenatal and genetic aetiology. Lancet. 1997, 350: 1723-1728. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05526-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Pukkala E, Skytthe A, Hemminki K: Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer–analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343: 78-85. 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Glessner JT, Hakonarson H: Common variants in polygenic schizophrenia. Genome Biol. 2009, 10: 236-10.1186/gb-2009-10-9-236.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Pamphlett R, Morahan JM: Copy number imbalances in blood and hair in monozygotic twins discordant for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2011, 18: 1231-1234. 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.12.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ehli EA, Abdellaoui A, Hu Y, Hottenga JJ, Kattenberg M, van Beijsterveldt T, Bartels M, Althoff RR, Xiao X, Scheet P, de Geus EJ, Hudziak JJ, Boomsma DI, Davies GE: De novo and inherited CNVs in MZ twin pairs selected for discordance and concordance on Attention Problems. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012, 20: 1037-1043. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Bloom RJ, Kähler AK, Collins AL, Chen G, Cannon TD, Hultman C, Sullivan PF: Comprehensive analysis of copy number variation in monozygotic twins discordant for bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013, 146: 289-290. 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.021.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Gringras P, Chen W: Mechanisms for differences in monozygous twins. Early Hum Dev. 2001, 64: 105-117. 10.1016/S0378-3782(01)00171-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Scanlan MJ, Simpson AJ, Old LJ: The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary. Cancer Immun. 2004, 4: 1-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Simpson AJ, Caballero OL, Jungbluth A, Chen YT, Old LJ: Cancer/testis antigens, gametogenesis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 615-625. 10.1038/nrc1669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitehurst AW: Cause and consequence of cancer/testis antigen activation in cancer. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014, 54: 251-272. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kulkarni P, Shiraishi T, Rajagopalan K, Kim R, Mooney SM, Getzenberg RH: Cancer/testis antigens and urological malignancies. Nat Rev Urol. 2012, 9: 386-396. 10.1038/nrurol.2012.117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Zubakov D, Boersma AW, Choi Y, van Kuijk PF, Wiemer EA, Kayser M: MicroRNA markers for forensic body fluid identification obtained from microarray screening and quantitative RT-PCR confirmation. Int J Legal Med. 2010, 124: 217-226. 10.1007/s00414-009-0402-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Luk JM, Lee NP, Shum CK, Lam BY, Siu AF, Che CM, Tam PC, Cheung AN, Yang ZM, Lin YN, Matzuk MM, Lee KF, Yeung WS: Acrosome-specific gene AEP1: identification, characterization and roles in spermatogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 209: 755-766. 10.1002/jcp.20746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zuo Y, Gao J, Yeung WS, Lee KF: The testis-specific VAD1.3/AEP1 interacts with β-actin and syntaxin 1 and directs peri-nuclear/Golgi expression with bipartite nucleus localization (BNL) sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 401: 275-280. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Spiegel I, Salomon D, Erne B, Schaeren-Wiemers N, Peles E: Caspr3 and caspr4, two novel members of the caspr family are expressed in the nervous system and interact with PDZ domains. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002, 20: 283-297. 10.1006/mcne.2002.1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Atkin NB, Baker MC: Specific chromosome change, i(12p), in testicular tumours?. Lancet. 1982, 2: 1349-10.1016/S0140-6736(82)91557-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mostert MM, van de Pol M, Olde Weghuis D, Suijkerbuijk RF, Geurts van Kessel A, van Echten J, Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LH: Comparative genomic hybridization of germ cell tumors of the adult testis: confirmation of karyotypic findings and identification of a 12p-amplicon. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1996, 89: 146-152. 10.1016/0165-4608(96)00043-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Summersgill B, Goker H, Weber-Hall S, Huddart R, Horwich A, Shipley J: Molecular cytogenetic analysis of adult testicular germ cell tumours andidentification of regions of consensus copy number change. Br J Cancer. 1998, 77: 305-313. 10.1038/bjc.1998.47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. McIntyre A, Summersgill B, Jafer O, Rodriguez S, Zafarana G, Oosterhuis JW, Gillis AJ, Looijenga L, Cooper C, Huddart R, Clark J, Shipley J: Defining minimum genomic regions of imbalance involved in testicular germ cell tumors of adolescents and adults through genome wide microarray analysis of cDNA clones. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 9142-9147. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Skotheim RI, Autio R, Lind GE, Kraggerud SM, Andrews PW, Monni O, Kallioniemi O, Lothe RA: Novel genomic aberrations in testicular germ cell tumors by array-CGH, and associated gene expression changes. Cell Oncol. 2006, 28: 315-326.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Summersgill BM, Jafer O, Wang R, Goker H, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Huddart R, Shipley J: Definition of chromosome aberrations in testicular germ cell tumor cell lines by 24-color karyotyping and complementary molecular cytogenetic analyses. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2001, 128: 120-129. 10.1016/S0165-4608(01)00414-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodriguez S, Jafer O, Goker H, Summersgill BM, Zafarana G, Gillis AJ, Van Gurp RJ, Oosterhuis JW, Lu YJ, Huddart R, Cooper CS, Clark J, Looijenga LH, Shipley JM: Expression profile of genes from 12p in testicular germ cell tumors of adolescents and adults associated with i(12p) and amplification at 12p11.2-p12.1. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 1880-1891. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zafarana G, Grygalewicz B, Gillis AJ, Vissers LE, van de Vliet W, van Gurp RJ, Stoop H, Debiec-Rychter M, Oosterhuis JW, van Kessel AG, Schoenmakers EF, Looijenga LH, Veltman JA: 12p- amplicon structure analysis in testicular germ cell tumors of adolescents and adults by array CGH. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 7695-7701. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Skotheim RI, Monni O, Mousses S, Fosså SD, Kallioniemi OP, Lothe RA, Kallioniemi A: New insights into testicular germ cell tumorigenesis from gene expression profiling. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 2359-2364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gillis AJ, Stoop H, Biermann K, van Gurp RJ, Swartzman E, Cribbes S, Ferlinz A, Shannon M, Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LH: Expression and interdependencies of pluripotency factors LIN28, OCT3/4, NANOG and SOX2 in human testicular germ cells and tumours of the testis. Int J Androl. 2011, 34: e160-e174. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01148.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hofer MD, Browne TJ, He L, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA, Rubin MA: Identification of two molecular groups of seminomas by using expression and tissue microarrays. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 5722-5729. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hiorns LR, Seckl MJ, Paradinas F, Sharp SY, Skelton LA, Brunstrom G, Newlands ES, Kelland LR, Leyland-Jones B: A molecular cytogenetic approach to studying platinum resistance. J Inorg Biochem. 1999, 77: 95-104. 10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00140-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Edsgärd D, Scheel M, Hansen NT, Ralfkiaer U, Jensen TS, Skakkebaek NE, Brunak S, Gupta R, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Ottesen AM: Heterozygous deletion at the RLN1 locus in a family with testicular germ cell cancer identified by integrating copy number variation data with phenome and interactome information. Int J Androl. 2011, 34: e122-e132. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01188.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Edsgärd D, Dalgaard MD, Weinhold N, Wesolowska-Andersen A, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Ottesen AM, Juul A, Skakkebæk NE, Skøt Jensen T, Gupta R, Leffers H, Brunak S: Genome-wide assessment of the association of rare and common copy number variations to testicular germ cell cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013, 29: 4:2-Google Scholar
  56. Stadler ZK, Esposito D, Shah S, Vijai J, Yamrom B, Levy D, Lee YH, Kendall J, Leotta A, Ronemus M, Hansen N, Sarrel K, Rau-Murthy R, Schrader K, Kauff N, Klein RJ, Lipkin SM, Murali R, Robson M, Sheinfeld J, Feldman D, Bosl G, Norton L, Wigler M, Offit K: Rare de novo germline copy-number variation in testicular cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2012, 91: 379-383. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.019.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Dalgaard MD, Weinhold N, Edsgärd D, Silver JD, Pers TH, Nielsen JE, Jørgensen N, Juul A, Gerds TA, Giwercman A, Giwercman YL, Cohn-Cedermark G, Virtanen HE, Toppari J, Daugaard G, Jensen TS, Brunak S, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebæk NE, Leffers H, Gupta R: A genome-wide association study of men with symptoms of testicular dysgenesis syndrome and its network biology interpretation. J Med Genet. 2012, 49: 58-65. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100174.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Silveira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement