Skip to main content
Download PDF

The serum levels of activin A and bone morphogenetic protein-4 and -6 in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 18, Article number: 111 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultrarare and disabling genetic disorder of connective tissue characterized by congenital malformation of the great toes, and progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) in soft connective tissues. A gain-of-function mutation of activin A receptor type I (ACVR1) enables ACVR1 to recognize activin A as an agonist with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling that leads to HO. Previous studies confirmed that activin A stimulates BMP signalling in vitro and drives HO in mouse models of FOP. However, the roles for BMP4 and BMP6 in FOP are supported only by correlative evidence in vitro. Thus, it remains unclear whether the circulating levels of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 correlate with flare-ups in FOP patients. Hence, we investigated the protein levels of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in the serum of FOP patients.

Results

We recruited 16 untreated FOP patients and 16 age- and sex- matched healthy control subjects in this study. The 16 FOP patients were retrospectively divided into the flare-up group (n = 8) and remission group (n = 8) depending on whether they had flare-ups or worsening of any joint movement in the last 6 months. The serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels were slightly higher in FOP patients (median: 434.05 pg/mL, 459.48 pg/mL and 67.84 pg/mL) versus healthy control subjects (median: 364.14 pg/mL, 450.39 pg/mL and 55.36 pg/mL). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all items), nor were there significant differences between the flare-up and remission groups of FOP (p > 0.05 for all items). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age, sex, and serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels were not related to flare-up in FOP patients.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in the serum levels of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in FOP patients compared with healthy control subjects. Serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 proteins might not be the stimulators for FOP flare-up, and may not be biomarkers for FOP diagnosis.

Background

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultrarare and disabling genetic disorder of connective tissue that is characterized by congenital malformation of the great toes and progressive endochondral heterotopic ossification (HO) in soft connective tissues, such as skeletal muscles, tendons and ligaments, spontaneously or after minor trauma or viral infections [1, 2]. The prevalence of this disorder is approximately 1 in 2 million worldwide, 1.36 per million in France, and 0.88 per million in the United States [3,4,5]. We previously estimated that there are 600–700 patients with this condition in mainland China [6]. To date, we have recruited more than 130 FOP patients to our hospital. A common activating mutation in the gene encoding activin receptor IA (ACVR1) /activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2), which is a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-type I receptor, exists in all familial and sporadic cases with a classic clinical presentation of FOP. Approximately 97% of individuals with FOP carry a gain-of-function mutation (c.617G > A; R206H) in the glycine-serine domain of ACVR1 [7], which results in enhanced BMP pathway signalling [8]. Activin A, a hormone-like factor not previously thought to play a role in this disease, is regarded as the main causative factor for FOP due to the following key facts: (1) endochondral HO could be triggered by activin A administration in the mouse model of FOP [9,10,11]; and (2) the inhibition of activin A with a blocking antibody completely inhibited the development of HO at the phases of both HO initiation and expansion in the FOP mouse model [9, 12]. The above evidence indicates that the role of activin A as the initiator of HO in FOP is solidly established. In addition, a recent study showed that there is a high level of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signalling in the fibroblasts of FOP patients [13]. Inhibition of TGF-β signalling can decrease osteogenic differentiation of FOP in vitro [13]. Systemic administration of TGF-β neutralizing antibody could effectively inhibit HO in a mouse model of FOP [14]. These results imply that the whole developmental process (inflammatory, fibroproliferative, chondrogenic and osteogenic phases [8]) of FOP lesions is not entirely controlled by activin A, and some other factors might participate in the pathogenesis of FOP.

The expression of some bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) might correlate with FOP. As the infection of Epstein‒Barr virus could induce flare-ups of FOP, Shafritz et al. established lymphoblastoid cell lines from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of FOP individuals and normal subjects through the transformation of the cells by Epstein‒Barr virus [15]. They found that the mRNA expression of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) was positive in 81% of the lymphoblastoid cell lines from FOP patients and positive only in 8% of normal control cell lines (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that the overexpression of BMP4 in lymphocytes might correlate with FOP. In addition, both primary connective tissue progenitor cells and induced human pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells from FOP patients showed increased SMAD1/5/8 signalling upon BMP4 stimulation [16, 17], and SMAD1/5/8 is the downstream protein complex of ACVR1R206H. We found by transcriptome analysis that the bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP6) mRNA content in PBMCs of FOP subjects was significantly higher than that of healthy control subjects (data not shown). In vitro data indicated that BMP6 enhanced SMAD1/5 phosphorylation in fibroblast cells from FOP patients [18]. It has also been reported that ACVR1R206H shows a higher sensitivity towards BMP6 than ACVR1WT does in vitro [19]. Furthermore, BMP4 and BMP6 are well known as stimulators of bone formation. Both BMP4 and BMP6 have been shown to induce endochondral osteogenesis in animals and in vitro [20,21,22]. However, there is no evidence in vivo for the roles of BMP4 and BMP6 in HO of FOP. Based on all of the results mentioned above, we consider that the roles of BMP4 and BMP6 remain elusive at this time point, and their roles need to be investigated further.

In many human diseases, such as endocrine diseases, the blood levels of disease-causing factors (hormones) are abnormal. Therefore, we wondered whether there are abnormalities in the serum levels of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in FOP patients, either in the flare-up or remission period. To answer this question, we measured the serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels in 16 untreated FOP patients and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. This study helps us to further reveal the disease profile of FOP.

Methods

Subjects

The present investigation was a cross-sectional observational study. A total of 16 untreated FOP patients and 16 age- and sex- matched healthy control subjects were recruited for the study between December 2015 and January 2016 at Tongji Hospital in Shanghai, China. All recruited subjects were Han people from China. FOP was diagnosed based on the classic clinical manifestations and genetic analyses [1, 23]. The clinical features of FOP include: (1) congenital malformation of the great toes; and (2) soft tissue swelling and at least one site of heterotopic ossification documented by X-ray film or CT scan. The flare-up was defined by the presence of at least two of six of the following symptoms: soft tissue swelling, pain, decreased range of motion, stiffness, redness, and warmth, which lasted for at least 2 days [24]. Remission was defined as at least 6 months free of flare-ups, and the patient state remained stable. The FOP patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) the flare-up group (n = 8), in which the patients had flare-ups or worsening of any joint movement in the last 6 months; and (2) the remission group (n = 8), in which the patients had no flare-up or worsening of joint movement in the last 6 months. Fasting venous blood samples were collected from all participants and processed within 30 min after collection. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all human studies were approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University. The approval number was K-2013–009.

Methods

Patient demographics, such as sex, age, clinical manifestations, family history and significant medical history, were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA-treated blood samples according to standard protocols. ACVR1 genotyping was performed in all the studied subjects. To determine the activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels in plasma samples from the subjects, we used the activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 human enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Kit (Cloud-Clone Corp., USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions using undiluted samples analysed in duplicate. Samples, standards, or controls were then added into the kit wells and bound to the immobilized (capture) antibody. The sandwich was formed by the addition of the second (detector) antibody, and a substrate solution was added that reacts with the enzyme-antibody-target complex to produce a measurable signal. The detection ranges were 12.35–1000 pg/mL for activin A, 31.2–2000 pg/mL for BMP4 and 15.6–1000 pg/mL for BMP6. The minimum detectable concentrations were 4.99 pg/mL for activin A, 12.3 pg/mL for BMP4 and 5.5 pg/mL for BMP6. The intra-assay coefficient of variance was 6.7%, and all the samples were measured in the same batch.

Statistical analysis

Exploratory data analysis and Shapiro‒Wilk tests were performed to determine the normality of the data distribution. Data are expressed as the means with standard deviation for continuous variables, median (25–75th percentile) for nonnormally distributed variables, and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared between groups with independent samples t tests or Mann‒Whitney U tests, and categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. These analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software. Tests were two-sided, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sixteen healthy subjects and sixteen FOP patients were enrolled in our study. The clinical characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. The mean ages of the controls and the patients were 10.8 and 14.7 years, respectively. The sex ratio was also similar between the control group (37.5% for males) and FOP group (43.8% for males). Age and sex were comparable between the healthy control subjects and FOP patients (both p > 0.05). The median levels of serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in healthy control subjects were 364.14 pg/mL, 450.39 pg/mL, and 55.36 pg/mL, respectively, while the levels of serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in FOP patients were 434.05 pg/mL, 459.48 pg/mL, and 67.84 pg/mL, respectively. Although we observed slightly higher serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels in FOP patients, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all) (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Clinical variables of all subjects
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 concentrations in healthy control subjects and FOP patients (NS: no significance)

Full size image

To further evaluate the roles of blood activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in FOP flare-ups, the levels of serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 were compared between FOP patients in remission and those in the flare-up period. As shown in Table 2, in 8 of 16 (50%) FOP patients, the state remained stable, which is called “in remission”. The other 8 patients had a history of flare-ups in the last 6 months, which is called “in flare-up”. Patients in the remission group were slightly older than those in the flare-up group (18.93 vs. 10.49, p = 0.082). No statistically significant difference in sex was found between the two groups (p = 0.619). The median levels of serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in the remission group were 438.48 pg/mL, 466.30 pg/mL and 68.80 pg/mL, respectively, while the levels in the flare-up group were 434.04 pg/mL, 459.48 pg/mL and 64.96 pg/mL, respectively. Notably, no significant differences in the concentrations of activin A, BMP4 or BMP6 were observed between the remission group and the flare-up group (p > 0.05 for all) (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Clinical variables of remission and flare-up FOP patients
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 concentrations in FOP patients in remission and with flare-up (NS: no significance)

Full size image

To obtain more information about risk factors for FOP flare-up, we used univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis for age, sex, serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels in FOP patients. The logistic regression analysis found no correlation between age, sex, serum activin A, BMP4 or BMP6 and the FOP flare-up (p > 0.05 for all) (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for the risk of FOP flare-up
Full size table

Discussion

In recent decades, numerous advances have been achieved in the field of FOP research, such as the proper characterization of disease progression through natural history studies, the identification of the causative gene and certain underlying molecular mechanisms, the development of in vitro and in vivo models resembling specific features of FOP, and the identification of specific cell types involved in HO and some important molecules with therapeutic potential. Despite these efforts, to date, there is no validated cure or biomarker for this catastrophic disease. Although activin A is a main pathogenic factor for FOP, are the levels of circulating activin A associated with the remission or flare-up of FOP? Are BMP4 and BMP6 as natural ligands of BMP signalling pathways associated with FOP?

Since activin A is the main pathogenic factor in FOP, we hypothesized that the levels of blood activin A may be increased in FOP patients. However, to our surprise, there were no significant differences in serum activin A concentrations between FOP patients and healthy control subjects, or between FOP patients with flare-up and those in remission. This suggests that blood activin A might not be the major pathogenic factor of FOP or a biomarker of flare-up in FOP patients. Activin A is a member of the TGF-β superfamily, which acts both in autocrine and paracrine manners as a hormone [25, 26]. Activin A regulates a host of important physiological and pathological processes locally and systemically, including immune and inflammatory responses, wound healing and fibrosis [27,28,29,30,31]. The serum concentration of activin A rapidly increases during inflammation. Activin A produced by inflammatory macrophages and other activated immune cells stimulates the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor(TNF) and interleukin-1β(IL-1β), and promotes the recruitment of mast cells [29, 32,33,34,35]. Although the levels of blood activin A were significantly increased in other inflammatory diseases [36,37,38], this result was not observed in this FOP study. Activin A is expressed in many types of cells and tissues in human, such as endocrine cells of stomach, duodenum and pancreas [39], gallbladder [40] and kidney [41], etc., therefore, the local fluctuation of activin A expression does not necessarily change the blood level of activin A. Activin A can not only amplify dysregulated BMP pathway signalling through SMAD1/5/8 to induce endochondral bone formation of FOP, but also enhance the chondrogenic differentiation of progenitor cells through SMAD2/3 and promote injury-induced endochondral HO [17, 42]. The inhibition of activin A using antibodies could block HO in both FOP and acquired HO [9, 10, 42]. It is speculated that activin A plays a role in local FOP lesions in a paracrine or autocrine manner. It remains to be explored how activin A is expressed in local lesions upon injury and in spontaneous inflammation and whether local activin A can determine the pathological stages of FOP.

It is well known that FOP results from mutations in the intracellular domain of ACVR1, which displays neofunctional responses to activin A and is hyperactive to BMPs [9, 10, 19]. Hatsell et al. [9] generated HEK293/BRE-Luc reporter lines stably expressing either ACVR1 or ACVR1R206H and tested their responses to a panel of ligands belonging to the BMP and TGF-β families. ACVR1R206H displayed increased signalling in response to BMP4, whereas the response to BMP6 remained unchanged. In addition, Hino et al. [10] generated induced mesenchymal stromal cells from FOP patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (FOP-iMSCs) and mutation-rescued FOP-iMSCs (resFOP-iMSCs). These cells were transfected with a BMP-specific luciferase reporter construct and treated with TGF-β superfamily ligands. The results showed that several BMP ligands, such as BMP6, BMP7 and BMP4, induced higher luminescence in FOP-iMSCs than in resFOP-iMSCs. Culbert presented that BMP4 enhanced chondrogenesis of ALK2R206H/+ cells in vitro coupled with their induction of robust heterotopic endochondral ossification in vivo [22]. Importantly, BMP4 is highly expressed in injured muscle tissue and in inflammatory and fibroproliferative cells from early human FOP lesions [15, 43]. In addition, BMP6, as the natural ligand of ACVR1, could induce chondrogenesis through pSMAD1/5/8 [42]. ACVR1R206H shows a higher sensitivity towards BMP6 than ACVR1WT in vitro [19]. However, we found that there were no significant increases in serum BMP4 and BMP6 concentrations in FOP patients either in remission or in flare-up. These results suggest that blood BMP4 and BMP6 may not be pathogenic factors of FOP or biomarkers of flare-up in FOP patients.

Study limitations

The present study has some limitations that warrant consideration. (1) FOP is an ultrarare disorder; therefore, the sample size of this study is small. (2) Such previous studies are scarcely reported, so we had few literature with which to compare our study. (3) The biopsy of lesions cannot be allowed by ethical regulations because it may induce HO at the surgical site, so we could not verify the protein expression of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 in the local cells and tissue fluid of the lesion. (4) As this was a cross-sectional comparison study, future longitudinal follow-up studies are needed to address whether changes in the blood levels of activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 track with HO in FOP patients.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study compared the serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 levels between FOP patients (either in flare-up or in remission) and healthy control subjects. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such results. There were no significant changes in the serum levels of activin A, BMP4 or BMP6 in FOP patients, whether during periods of flare-up or during remission. Serum activin A, BMP4 and BMP6 may not be the causes of FOP flare-up and may not be used as potential biomarkers for FOP flare-up.

Availability of data and materials

All patient data has been anonymized, and any further information may be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACVR1:

Activin A receptor type 1

ALK2:

Activin receptor-like kinase 2

BMP:

Bone morphogenetic protein

BMP4:

Bone morphogenetic protein 4

BMP6:

Bone morphogenetic protein 6

ELISA:

Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

FOP:

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

HO:

Heterotopic ossification

NS:

No significance

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

References

  1. Kaplan FS, Al Mukaddam M, Stanley A, Towler OW, Shore EM. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a disorder of osteochondrogenesis. Bone. 2020;140: 115539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang W, Zhang K, Song L, Pang J, Ma H, Shore EM, Kaplan FS, Wang P. The phenotype and genotype of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in China: a report of 72 cases. Bone. 2013;57(2):386–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: clinical and genetic aspects. Orphanet J Rare Diseases. 2011;6(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baujat G, Choquet R, Bouee S, Jeanbat V, Courouve L, Ruel A, Michot C, Le Quan Sang KH, Lapidus D, Messiaen C, Landais P, Cormier-Daire V. Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in France: an estimate based on a record linkage of two national databases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pignolo RJ, Hsiao EC, Baujat G, Lapidus D, Sherman A, Kaplan FS. Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in the United States: estimate from three treatment centers and a patient organization. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. She D, Zhang K. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in China. Bone. 2018;109:101–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, Fenstermacher DA, Cho TJ, Choi IH, Connor JM, Delai P, Glaser DL, LeMerrer M, Morhart R, Rogers JG, Smith R, Triffitt JT, Urtizberea JA, Zasloff M, Brown MA, Kaplan FS. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38(5):525–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan FSMM, Baujat G, Brown M, Cali A, Cho TJ, Crowe C, De Cunto CL, Delai P, Diecidue RJ, Rocco MI, Eekhoff EMW, Friedman C, Grunwald Z, Haga N, Hsiao EC, Keen R, Kitterman J, Levy C, Morhart R, Netelenbos JC, Scott C, Shore EM, Zasloff MA, Zhang KQ, Pignolo RJ. The medical management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: current treatment considerations. Proc Intl Clin Council FOP. 2021;2:1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatsell SJ, Idone V, Wolken DM, Huang L, Kim HJ, Wang L, Wen X, Nannuru KC, Jimenez J, Xie L, Das N, Makhoul G, Chernomorsky R, D’Ambrosio D, Corpina RA, Schoenherr CJ, Feeley K, Yu PB, Yancopoulos GD, Murphy AJ, Economides AN. ACVR1R206H receptor mutation causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva by imparting responsiveness to activin A. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):303ra137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hino K, Ikeya M, Horigome K, Matsumoto Y, Ebise H, Nishio M, Sekiguchi K, Shibata M, Nagata S, Matsuda S, Toguchida J. Neofunction of ACVR1 in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(50):15438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hino K, Horigome K, Nishio M, Komura S, Nagata S, Zhao C, Jin Y, Kawakami K, Yamada Y, Ohta A, Toguchida J, Ikeya M. Activin-A enhances mTOR signaling to promote aberrant chondrogenesis in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(9):3339–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Upadhyay J, Xie L, Huang L, Das N, Stewart RC, Lyon MC, Palmer K, Rajamani S, Graul C, Lobo M, Wellman TJ, Soares EJ, Silva MD, Hesterman J, Wang L, Wen X, Qian X, Nannuru K, Idone V, Murphy AJ, Economides AN, Hatsell SJ. The expansion of heterotopic bone in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is activin a-dependent. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(12):2489–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Micha D, Voermans E, Eekhoff MEW, van Essen HW, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Netelenbos C, Rustemeyer T, Sistermans EA, Pals G, Bravenboer N. Inhibition of TGFbeta signaling decreases osteogenic differentiation of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva fibroblasts in a novel in vitro model of the disease. Bone. 2016;84:169–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang X, Li F, Xie L, Crane J, Zhen G, Mishina Y, Deng R, Gao B, Chen H, Liu S, Yang P, Gao M, Tu M, Wang Y, Wan M, Fan C, Cao X. Inhibition of overactive TGF-beta attenuates progression of heterotopic ossification in mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafritz AB, Shore EM, Gannon FH, Zasloff MA, Taub R, Muenke M, Kaplan FS. Overexpression of an osteogenic morphogen in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(8):556–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barruet E, Morales BM, Lwin W, White MP, Theodoris CV, Kim H, Urrutia A, Wong SA, Srivastava D, Hsiao EC. The ACVR1 R206H mutation found in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva increases human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cell formation and collagen production through BMP-mediated SMAD1/5/8 signaling. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang H, Shore EM, Pignolo RJ, Kaplan FS. Activin A amplifies dysregulated BMP signaling and induces chondro-osseous differentiation of primary connective tissue progenitor cells in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). Bone. 2018;109:218–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin H, Ying Y, Wang YY, Wang G, Jiang SS, Huang D, Luo L, Chen YG, Gerstenfeld LC, Luo Z. AMPK downregulates ALK2 via increasing the interaction between Smurf1 and Smad6, leading to inhibition of osteogenic differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(12):2369–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hildebrand L, Stange K, Deichsel A, Gossen M, Seemann P. The fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) mutation p.R206H in ACVR1 confers an altered ligand response. Cell Signal. 2017;29:23–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miljkovic ND, Cooper GM, Marra KG. Chondrogenesis, bone morphogenetic protein-4 and mesenchymal stem cells. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(10):1121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vukicevic S, Grgurevic L, Erjavec I, Pecin M, Bordukalo-Niksic T, Stokovic N, Lipar M, Capak H, Maticic D, Windhager R, Sampath TK, Gupta M. Autologous blood coagulum is a physiological carrier for BMP6 to induce new bone formation and promote posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in rabbits. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020;14(1):147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Culbert AL, Chakkalakal SA, Theosmy EG, Brennan TA, Kaplan FS, Shore EM. Alk2 regulates early chondrogenic fate in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva heterotopic endochondral ossification. Stem Cells. 2014;32(5):1289–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitoh H. Clinical aspects and current therapeutic approaches for FOP. Biomedicines. 2020;8(9):325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pignolo RJ, Bedford-Gay C, Liljesthrom M, Durbin-Johnson BP, Shore EM, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. The natural history of flare-ups in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a comprehensive global assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(3):650–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bloise E, Ciarmela P, Dela Cruz C, Luisi S, Petraglia F, Reis FM. Activin A in mammalian physiology. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(1):739–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X, Fischer G, Hyvonen M. Structure and activation of pro-Activin A. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yaden BC, Wang YX, Wilson JM, Culver AE, Milner A, Datta-Mannan A, Shetler P, Croy JE, Dai G, Krishnan V. Inhibition of Activin A ameliorates skeletal muscle injury and rescues contractile properties by inducing efficient remodeling in female mice. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(4):1152–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou J, Tai G, Liu H, Ge J, Feng Y, Chen F, Yu F, Liu Z. Activin A down-regulates the phagocytosis of lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo. Cell Immunol. 2009;255(1–2):69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Cui X, Tai G, Ge J, Li N, Chen F, Yu F, Liu Z. A critical role of Activin A in maturation of mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo. Cell Mol Immunol. 2009;6(5):387–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wietecha MS, Pensalfini M, Cangkrama M, Muller B, Jin J, Brinckmann J, Mazza E, Werner S. Activin-mediated alterations of the fibroblast transcriptome and matrisome control the biomechanical properties of skin wounds. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gaedeke J, Boehler T, Budde K, Neumayer HH, Peters H. Glomerular activin A overexpression is linked to fibrosis in anti-Thy1 glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transp. 2005;20(2):319–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones KL, Brauman JN, Groome NP, de Kretser DM, Phillips DJ. Activin A release into the circulation is an early event in systemic inflammation and precedes the release of follistatin. Endocrinology. 2000;141(5):1905–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jones KL, Mansell A, Patella S, Scott BJ, Hedger MP, de Kretser DM, Phillips DJ. Activin A is a critical component of the inflammatory response, and its binding protein, follistatin, reduces mortality in endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(41):16239–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ge J, Wang Y, Feng Y, Liu H, Cui X, Chen F, Tai G, Liu Z. Direct effects of activin A on the activation of mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2009;6(2):129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Funaba M, Murakami M, Ikeda T, Ogawa K, Tsuchida K, Sugino H. Identification of tocopherol-associated protein as an activin/TGF-beta-inducible gene in mast cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(8):900–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Linko RHM, Pettilä V, Ruokonen E, Ala-Kokko T, Ludlow H, de Kretser DM. Serum activin A and B, and follistatin in critically ill patients with influenza A(H1N1) infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang LL, Liu CT. Activin A is associated with asthma in underweight and overweight patients. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(1):440–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsai YL, Chou RH, Kuo CS, Chang CC, Wu CH, Huang PH, Chen JW, Lin SJ. Circulating activin A is a surrogate for the incidence of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Circ J. 2019;83(7):1514–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. La Rosa SUS, Billo P, Facco C, Sessa F, Capella C. Immunohistochemical localization of alpha- and betaA-subunits of inhibin/activin in human normal endocrine cells and related tumors of the digestive system. Virchows Arch. 1999;434(1):29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson A, Kampf C, Sjostedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CA, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, Edqvist PH, Berling H, Tegel H, Mulder J, Rockberg J, Nilsson P, Schwenk JM, Hamsten M, von Feilitzen K, Forsberg M, Persson L, Johansson F, Zwahlen M, von Heijne G, Nielsen J, Ponten F. Proteomics tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tuuri TEM, Hildén K, Ritvos O. The tissue distribution of activin beta A- and beta B-subunit and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acids suggests multiple sites of action for the activin-follistatin system during human development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(6):1521–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mundy CYL, Sinha S, Chung J, Rux D, Catheline SE, Koyama E, Qin L, Pacifici M. Activin A promotes the development of acquired heterotopic ossification and is an effective target for disease attenuation in mice. Sci Signal. 2021;14(669):eabd0536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gannon FHKFS, Olmsted E, Finkel GC, Zasloff MA, Shore E. Bone morphogenetic protein 2/4 in early fibromatous lesions of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:339–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the patients with FOP and control individuals who gave consent and participated in this study. Thanks to Dr. Yi Chen (Shanghai Kangdai Biotechnology Company) for his revising to the English writing of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81670805, 82270877).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhengqin Ye and Siyi Wang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 389, Xincun Road, Shanghai, 200065, China

    Zhengqin Ye, Chang Shan, Qi Zhu, Ying Xue & Keqin Zhang

  2. Medical School of Nantong University, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, 19 Qixiu Road, Nantong, Jiangsu, China

    Siyi Wang

  3. Institute of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 389, Xincun Road, Shanghai, 200065, China

    Keqin Zhang

Authors
  1. Zhengqin Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chang Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Keqin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZY and SW contributed equally to the implementation of the study, including data collection, sorting, analysis and drafting the manuscript. CS and QZ were involved in the patient recruitment, data collection and running the experiments. YX contributed to the clinical data analysis. KZ conceived and designed the study, drafted and revised the manuscript, read and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keqin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University. The approval number was K-2013-009. All participants gave informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Z., Wang, S., Shan, C. et al. The serum levels of activin A and bone morphogenetic protein-4 and -6 in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Orphanet J Rare Dis 18, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02708-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02708-3

Keywords

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172