Skip to main content

Next-generation sequencing reveals novel variants and large deletion in FANCA gene in Polish family with Fanconi anemia



Fanconi anemia (FA) is the most common inherited bone marrow failure syndrome. However, establishing its molecular diagnosis remains challenging. Chromosomal breakage analysis is the gold standard diagnostic test for this disease. Nevertheless, molecular analysis is always required for the identification of pathogenic alterations in the FA genes.


We report here on a family with FA diagnosis in two siblings. Mitomycin C (MMC) test revealed high level of chromosome breaks and radial figures. In both children, array—Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) showed maternally inherited 16q24.3 deletion, including FANCA gene, and next generation sequencing (NGS) disclosed paternally inherited novel variants in the FANCA gene—Asn1113Tyr and Ser890Asn. A third sibling was shown to be a carrier of FANCA deletion only.


Although genetic testing in FA patients often requires a multi-method approach including chromosome breakage test, aCGH, and NGS, every effort should be made to make it available for whole FA families. This is not only to confirm the clinical diagnosis of FA in affected individuals, but also to enable identification of carriers of FA gene(s) alterations, as it has implications for diagnostic and genetic counselling process.


Fanconi anemia (FA) is the most common form of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) related to developmental abnormalities. Clinical symptoms, present in about 75% of patients, most often include short stature, microcephaly, thumb and radial side limb defects, abnormal skin pigmentation, and genitourinary defects. Progressive bone marrow failure occurs in the first decade of life, initially often expressed by leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. The most common malignancies occurring in patients with FA are acute myeloid leukemia and solid tumors of the head and neck, skin, and gastrointestinal as well as genitourinary systems [1, 2]. At the cellular level, FA is characterized by sensitivity to interstrand crosslinking agents (ICL), such as diepoxybutane (DEB) and mitomycin C (MMC) [3, 4]. FA is mostly caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in any of the 21 genes: FANCA, FANCC, FANCD1(BRCA2), FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCJ(BRIP1), FANCL, FANCM, FANCN(PALB2), FANCO(RAD51C), FANCP(SLX4), FANCQ(ERCC4), FANCS(BRCA1), FANCT(UBE2T), FANCU(XRXX2), FANCV(MAD2L2/REV7), FANCW(RFWD3), FANCY(FAP100). Variants in FANCB (presenting X-linked recessive inheritance pattern) and FANCR/RAD51 (presenting autosomal dominant inheritance pattern) have also been reported as disease-causing, therefore a total of 23 genes have been implicated in the pathogenicity of FA so far [5, 6]. In two-thirds of FA patients pathogenic variants occur in FANCA, making it the most frequently mutated FA gene. Approximately 20% of patients carry mutations in FANCC or FANCG, and mutations in the other 20 FA genes account for 0.1–4% cases per gene. FANCA variants include single nucleotide variants, small insertions, and deletions which may be detected by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). However, 20–40% of FANCA mutations are large deletions, which size span a wide range from ~ 1 to 545 kb, identified by array—Comparative Genome Hybridization (aCGH) or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) [7, 8].

The wider study we performed under the research grant WL131 aimed to provide a detailed and accurate genetic diagnosis for all Fanconi anemia individuals and their families by establishing a comprehensive diagnostic approach for this rare condition. In this paper, we focus on clinical presentation and the results of genetic analyses in one selected family showing that a broad approach comprising chromosome breakage test followed by chromosomal microarray analysis and NGS is not only sufficient to provide the genetic diagnosis in FA patients, but also proves beneficial when extended to the whole family.


Clinical and hematological report

A 5-year-old male (Patient 1—IV.3) was born with a birth weight of 2520 g, and Apgar score of 10. He was the first child of unrelated healthy parents. There was a history of three recurrent miscarriages in his mother, as well as a presence of congenital defects and early infant death on the maternal side of the pedigree (Fig. 1a). An extra thumb, a heart defect with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and abnormal localization of the right kidney were noted at newborn period. PDA was closed with coil implementation at the age of 6 months. During the following years short stature, low weight, café-au-lait spots, and conductive hearing impairment became apparent. At the age of five he was referred to the Clinical Genetic Department where slight epicanthic folds, large and short neck, kyphoscoliosis, pes plano-valgi were also noted (Fig. 1b). The boy met the criteria of congenital abnormality score (CABS) 3 (1 point each for heart anomaly, kidney defect, and hearing impairment) [9].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Summary of clinical and genetic findings in the presented family. a Pedigree of FA family. Squares—males, circles—females, open—unaffected individuals, filled—affected individuals, half filled—carriers of deletion or mutation. MMC+/− = positive or negative result of MMC test, aCGH+/− = presence or absence of heterozygous deletion encompassing FANCA gene detected by aCGH, FANCA+/− = presence or absence of mutation in FANCA gene detected by NGS, Ca/Ca? = presence or possible presence of cancer. Black arrow indicates the proband. bc Congenital anomalies in siblings with FA. B—short stature, posture defect, extra thumb and pes plano-valgi in patient 1 (IV.3). C—large short neck, corrected extra thumb, and cafe-au-lait spots in patient 2 (IV.4). de Metaphase spreads in patients 1 (d) and 2 (e)—MMC test. Green arrows show gaps, chromatid breaks (chtb) and acentric fragments (ace). Red arrows show radial figures. Blue arrow shows chromatid interchange figure. f Partial array-CGH result showing the 16q24.3 deletion in the proband (patient IV.3). The same heterozygous deletion was detected in his siblings and mother. g Visualisation of FANCA sequencing reads showing c.3337A > T; p.Asn1113Tyr variant (g1), and Sanger sequencing electrophoregram plots confirming the variant (g2—wild type found in the mother III.3, and younger daughter IV.6, g3—mutation in the heterozygous father III.2, g4—mutation in the only copy of the gene in IV.3 and IV.4 siblings)

For the first 2 years of life complete blood count was normal except for the episode of acute hemolytic anemia due to the PDA (this presented with elevated unconjugated bilirubin levels, reticulocyte count, and decreased haptoglobin). Complete recovery was achieved after additional coil deployment and infusion of 7 units of red blood cell concentrate.

The next episode of cytopenia occurred at the age of 2 years with decreased platelet count on pneumonia. In the third year of life the median platelet and neutrocyte counts were 110 × 103/µl (91–129) and 1 × 103/µl (0.98–2.8), respectively. In the fourth year of life these results amounted to 78 × 103/µl (35–103) and 1 × 103/µl (0.67–1.5), in the fifth one to 58 × 103/µl (35–99) and 0.95 × 103/µl (0.53–1.9), respectively. For the first time hemoglobin reduction to 9.8 g/dl occurred at 6 years of age, and at the same time platelet count dropped below 20 × 103/µl. The boy started to demonstrate hemorrhagic symptoms (bruising, epistaxis) and became dependent on platelet transfusions. Myelogram showed low cellularity (20–30%) represented nearly exclusively by the erythroid lineage cells.

After the diagnosis of FA was confirmed by genetic testing, an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was performed from the matched unrelated donor (MUD). Following conditioning with busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/day, 4 days), cyclophosphamide (10 mg/kg/day, 4 days), fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day, 5 days) and antithymocyte globulin (40 mg/kg/day, 4 days), peripheral blood cells of 4.5 × 106 CD34 + /kg and 0.87 × 108 CD3 + /kg were infused. Cyclosporine (days − 3 to + 100) with mycophenolate mophetil (45 mg/kg/day days + 1) for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was administered. The time to neutrophil (> 0.5 × 109/l), platelet (> 20 × 109/l) engraftment was 14 and 9 days, respectively. The first reticulocytes emerged on day + 10, and maximal reticulocyte count (41‰) was achieved on day + 17, with complete donor chimerism. Only minor feverish episodes complicated the post-transplant course. There were neither symptoms of viral infections reactivation nor graft versus host disease. The boy receives regular follow-up care, and up to date presents with normal ranges of a complete blood cell counts. Timeline summary of clinical and diagnostic information for this patient is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Timeline summary of clinical and diagnostic data for patient IV.3 (proband)

His 1 year younger sister (Patient 2—IV.4) was born with a birth weight of 2325 g and Apgar scores of 10. An extra thumb, PDA, and ectopic pelvic left kidney were noted at the newborn period. Due to suspicion of Fanconi anemia in the family, the girl was referred for genetic evaluation. On physical examination a large philtrum, large short neck, and large chest were noted (Fig. 1c). The girl fulfilled the criteria of CABS2 score. She shows normal growth parameters according to standard growth curves, her PDA is stable and does not require surgical intervention. The complete blood count has been monitored since the girl was five. In her sixth and seventh years of life the median neutrocyte count was 1.4 × 103/µl, while the median platelet count was 128 × 103/µl and 97 × 103/µl, respectively.

The youngest sister (Patient 3—IV.6) and the parents have not presented symptoms similar to those of older siblings.

G-banding analysis and chromosome breakage test

Heparinized venous blood (≥ 5 ml) was used to prepare whole-blood cultures as usual for routine cytogenetic analysis. Four cultures per individual and healthy control were prepared by adding 0.5 ml blood to 4.5 ml complete RPMI medium (Gibco) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), gentamicin and phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (both Gibco), as prescribed (Joenje and co-workers). The cultures were incubated for 72 h with 0, 50, 150, or 300 nM mitomycin C (MMC; Sigma Aldrich). After treatment with colcemid (0.1 µg/ml) for 50 min, cells were harvested, incubated with 0.075 M KCL for 20 min at 37 °C, and fixed with 75% methanol and 25% acetic acid. Cytogenetic preparations were stained for 2 min in a 5% Giemsa solution (Merck); banding technique was applied only to slides from cultures without MMC to analyze the karyotype. The microscope analysis was performed with a Nikon E600 microscope and later analyzed by computer assisted metaphase system (ASI, Israel).

Chromosome instability data were analyzed and calculated (number of metaphases with breakage, mean chromosome break events per aberrant metaphase, and tri-, tetra-, and multi- radials frequency) [10]. A healthy control was assured.

Nucleic acid extraction

Blood samples were collected from the proband, his sisters and parents. Whole genomic DNA was extracted from nucleated cells by silica gel column methods according to the manufacturer ‘s protocol (Qiagen) for aCGH assay and by using Prepito TM for NGS assay.

Array—Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH)

aCGH was performed using the commercially available platform (Sure Print G3 Human CGH 8 × 60Microarray Kit, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Copy number analysis was performed using Agilent CytoGenomics Software 5.0.

Next generation sequencing (NGS)

A targeted next-generation sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina) was performed using a targeted multigene custom panel including ATM, BLM, BRIP1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCG, NBN, and PALB2 genes. The sequencing library preparation was performed using SeqCap EZ Choice NimbleGen (Roche). The sample was sequenced with Illumina technology on Miseq sequencer with 2 × 75 bp reads. Demultiplexing of the sequencing reads was performed with Illumina's bcl2fastq2 v2.19.0. Adapters were trimmed with Skewer version 0.2.9 [11]. The reads were aligned to GRCh37/hg19 reference sequence using BWA-MEM [12]. Read duplicates were removed using Picard 2.18.2 ( Variant call was performed with GATK v4.0.3.0 HaplotypeCaller [13, 14] and FreeBayes (v1.2.0-2-g29c4002) [15]. Variants have been annotated with databases (i) VEP97 [16]: annotations Sift, Polyphen2, (ii) dbNSFPv4.0 [17] annotations: MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, DANN, FATHMM, (iii) ESP6500, (iv) GnomAD, (v) dbSNP, (vi) ClinVar and (vii) 1000 Genomes [18].

For the purpose of the study all the genetic analyses were performed in all siblings and their parents.


G-banding analysis and chromosome breakage test

Cytogenetic GTG analysis showed normal karyotypes in all family members.

A standard chromosome breakage test with mitomycin C revealed chromosomal hypersensitivity to crosslinking agent in patients 1 (IV.3) and 2 (IV.4) (Fig. 1d–e). The number of metaphases with breaks, the mean number of breaks per aberrant metaphase, and radials frequency were higher than the normal range for non-FA cells (Table 1). The cytogenetic findings were compatible with Fanconi anemia. The results of patient 3 (IV.6) and the parents were normal.

Table 1 Cytogenetic findings of spontaneous and MMC-induced chromosome aberrations (breaks, radial forms) of examined patients 1 (IV.3) and 2 (IV.4) compared to healthy control group

Array—Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH)

In patients 1 (IV.3), 2 (IV.4), and 3 (IV.6), aCGH analysis showed a heterozygous deletion of ~ 93 kb in chromosome 16q24.3 (Fig. 1f), encompassing the whole FANCA gene (arr[hg19] 16q24.3(89804014_89897040) × 1). Parental array analysis showed the same heterozygous deletion in the mother (III.3). No other copy number imbalances of potential clinical significance have been detected.

Next generation sequencing (NGS)

Next-generation sequencing analysis revealed in patients IV.3 and IV.4 the presence of three rare variants (with minor allele frequency < 1%), all localized in cis, in the only allele of FANCA gene: (i) a novel variant c.3337A > T; p.(Asn1113Tyr) found in exon 33 [NM_000135.2; NP_000126.2] (Fig. 1g1); (ii) c.2669G > A; p.(Ser890Asn), rs1055448646 in exon 28, and (iii) c.1614G > A; p.(Gly538 =), rs747421581 in exon 17. According to ACMG classification [19], the p.Asn1113Tyr is a likely pathogenic variant—it meets the criteria of PM1 (is located in a mutational hotspot and/or critical and well-established functional domain), PM2 (is absent in mutation databases such as gnomAD), PP2 (missense variants are a common cause of the disease), PP3 (bioinformatic algorithms predict its pathogenic character). p.Ser890Asn, fulfilling PM2 (low populational frequency), PP2, and BP4 (bioinformatic algorithms predict its benign character) criteria is classified as VUS (Variant of Uncertain Significance). The synonymous variant p.Gly538 = , fulfilling PM2, BP4, BP6 (reputable source recently reports variant as benign but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation), and BP7 (a synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved) criteria is likely a benign variant. The presence of all variants was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1g2–4.), revealing their paternal origin. Table 2 shows summary of detected variants.

Table 2 Clinically relevant molecular findings in FANCA gene in examined family

To confirm the pathogenic character of FANCA gene variants identified in affected children and their father, functional studies should be performed. Our classification of mutations done in accordance with mutation databases has only presumable character.


Fanconi anemia is a complex disorder, therefore understanding its underlying molecular mechanisms is critical not only for the diagnosis but also for the clinical management of the affected individuals and their families [20].

Clinical presentation of FA patients is highly variable even among individuals within the same family or among patients within the same complementation group, therefore the diagnosis should be confirmed by a positive chromosomal breakage test and identification of a causal pathogenic mutation in one of the FA-related genes [21, 22].

The FANCA gene (OMIM: 607139) is located on chromosome 16q24.3, contains 43 exons along a coding sequence of 4.3 kb, spans approximately 80 kb [23, 24] and is by far the most commonly mutated gene in patients with FA worldwide, accounting for the disease in the 60–70% of FA families. However, the percentages may differ for certain ethnic populations [8, 22, 25,26,27,28,29]. Therefore, molecular testing usually starts with this particular gene [8, 29]. Extensive allelic and non-allelic heterogeneity of FANCA gene mutations causes major problems in molecular diagnostics. If no mutation in FANCA is detected, the screening is extended to other FA genes [31]. The next most frequently mutated genes that are responsible for ~ 10–15% of cases are FANCC and FANCG [8, 22, 27, 28]. Causative mutations in other FA genes are rare and account for 0.1–3% of cases per gene [8, 22].

Several diagnostic approaches for FA have been described in the literature. The diagnosis of FA is still classically based on clinical evaluation followed by exposing patients’ lymphocytes to MMC or DEB, and performing subsequent quantification of all types of chromosomal breakages and radial forms [29, 30]. Although a positive chromosome breakage test is highly indicative for FA, it is not 100% specific for FA and can produce false-negative and false-positive results [31, 32]. Therefore, a molecular investigation is needed for definitive and accurate diagnosis, prognosis assessment and genetic counseling for FA families [28]. This, however, can be a daunting, complex, and time-consuming task [8, 20, 23, 29] due to genetic heterogeneity, large (and constantly growing) number of FA genes, together with a wide spectrum of private mutations [33].

Complete molecular diagnosis of the disease-causing specific pathogenic variants is fundamental for confirmation of the diagnosis, management of patients, genetic counseling, carrier testing, and prenatal diagnosis. Molecular diagnosis is also critical for the identification of appropriate donors for bone marrow transplantation, and for exploring novel therapeutic approaches [7, 8, 29, 31].

FA-related genes present a remarkable mutational heterogeneity [26]. The ever-growing portfolio of mutations includes point mutations, small insertions/deletions, splicing defects, and large deletions [8, 34]. The latter appears to be a frequent subtype of variation, especially in FANCA, accounting for 20–40% of all pathogenic variants of this gene [7, 8, 22, 35, 36].

Significant proportion of large deletions results from a high content of Alu repeats in this region. Alu repeats can facilitate intrachromosomal recombinations and generate intragenic copy number variants through unequal crossing-over and their presence is directly correlated with deletion breakpoints [28, 29, 36,37,38]. Alu elements can also induce exon skipping with the effect of both upstream and downstream alternative exons [23, 35].

Several methods have been used in screening protocols for FANCA. However, it became clear that they must incorporate methods that can detect point mutations as well as small and large deletions [26, 36]. In the past, after clinical diagnosis and a positive chromosome breakage test, FA patients' molecular characterization was achieved by Sanger sequencing of candidate genes. This approach for FA is time-consuming, costly and, the most importantly, may not detect all types of disease-causing mutations [21]. NGS seems to facilitate a more comprehensive diagnostic strategy for FA patients' characterization, especially with the development of targeted panels for FA genes [22, 26].

Large deletions can be detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay [8]. However, MLPA is a targeted assay and can identify only indicated DNA sequences. Moreover, it identifies only deleted exons, but not the precise breakpoints [7]. Until now, there has been very little effort made to expand the screening for all FA genes at once and to define the precise molecular nature of particular deletions. FANCA deletion analysis by MLPA was previously proposed as an initial step in a comprehensive mutation screening strategy [8, 21, 35]. Moreover, 90% of all FA gene deletions occur in FANCA, and approximately half of them extend beyond the FANCA gene region, affecting the integrity of neighboring genes and influencing patient's phenotype [7, 8, 35]. Thus, the larger insight in the phenotypic (including clinical) picture of the patients is needed.

Currently, aCGH can be considered as an integral component of a comprehensive strategy for identifying disease-causing variants in FA genes. Efforts should be made to correlate these variants with associated phenotypic changes. The identification of precise breakpoints possible by aCGH in contrast to MLPA, allows for quick screening of deletions in family members and provides insight into the deletion driving mechanisms [7, 8].

In our study, we present a family with compound alterations in FANCA gene.

In all children, a heterozygous deletion of chromosome region 16q24.3 was detected, including the entire FANCA gene. The same deletion was present in the mother. As this heterozygous deletion did not explain clinical features in patients IV.3 and IV.4, mutational analysis using next generation sequencing was performed, which identified the presence of a novel paternally inherited c.3337A > T; p.(Asn1113Tyr) pathogenic variant in exon 33 of FANCA gene accompanied by c.2669G > A; p.(Ser890Asn) variant, classified as VUS (variant of uncertain significance). To finally determine the meaning of each variant, it is necessary to perform functional tests.

This study has its limitations. Functional studies, together with protein modelling, were outside the initial scope of this study and its funding. These will, however, be performed in a follow-up project, and the results will be made available separately.

In the era of precision medicine, detailed diagnostic work-up and genetic testing are of great importance for accurate diagnosis, prognostic estimation, and personalized treatment, especially for rare and life-threatening disorders.


Our study adds to observations made by other authors, that the application of evolving new technologies can help mutation detection in genetically heterogeneous diseases become more economical, affordable, and efficient. Mutation identification in a FA patient, and establishing a carrier status in relatives, is an important part of the diagnostic and genetic counselling process for each FA family [7, 20, 25].

Genetic testing is a valuable tool for families with FA suspicion. There are several reasons for it. First, it confirms the diagnosis of FA among patients with inconclusive chromosome breakage tests or those with clinical features overlapping with other genetic syndrome features. Second, the identification of the family mutations could be useful for prenatal screening in future pregnancies. Third, heterozygous carriers could be identified within the family with FA and the genetic counseling could also be offered to these individuals.

In conclusion, application of NGS-based gene panel testing for all known FA genes in combination with chromosomal microarrays for FANCA or, as a new option—copy number variant (CNV) testing with NGS, provides a comprehensive approach for mutational FANCA screening, including identification of large deletions, and should be offered to all clinically diagnosed FA patients. It proves to be a valuable tool for clinical management, including reproductive counseling and prenatal diagnosis for whole families. Identification of novel FANCA mutations provides a better understanding of molecular mechanisms and further genotype–phenotype correlation searching of the condition.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



Fanconi anemia


Interstrand Crosslinking Agents




Mitomycin C


Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridisation; microarrays


Next Generation Sequencing


Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification


Patent Ductus Arteriosus


Congenital Abnormality Score


Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant


Matched Unrelated Donor


Graft-versus-Host Disease


Copy Number Variation


Variant of Uncertain Significance


  1. Niraj J, Färkkilä A, D’Andrea AD. The Fanconi anemia pathway in cancer. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2019;3:457–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dokal I. Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. J Hematopathol. 2011;4:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Auerbach A. Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia by diepoxybutane analysis. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015;85:8.7.1-8.7.17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winter J, Joenje H. Genetic and molecular basis of Fanconi anemia. Mutat Res. 2009;668:11–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nepal M, Che R, Zhang J, et al. Fanconi anemia signaling and cancer. Trends Cancer. 2017;3(12):840–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor AMR, Rothblum-Oviatt C, Ellis NA, et al. Chromosome instability syndromes. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Flynn EK, Kamat A, Lach FP, et al. Comprehensive analysis of pathogenic deletion variants in Fanconi anemia genes. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(11):1342–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimble DC, Lach FP, Gregg SQ, et al. A comprehensive approach to identification of pathogenic FANCA variants in Fanconi anemia patients and their families. Hum Mut. 2018;39(2):237–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg PS, Huang Y, Alter BP. Individualized risks of first adverse events in patients with Fanconi anemia. Blood. 2004;104(2):350–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oostra AB, Nieuwint AWM, Joenje H, et al. Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia: chromosomal breakage analysis. Anemia. 2012;6:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang H, Lei R, Ding S-W, et al. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. 2013. Preprint at

  13. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poplin R, Ruano-Rubio V, DePristo MA, et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. 2018. Preprint at

  15. Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012. Preprint at

  16. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Wu C, Li C, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP v3.0: a one-stop database of functional predictions and annotations for human non-synonymous and splice site SNVs. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(3):235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 1000Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chandrasekharappa SC, Lach FP, Kimble DC, et al. Massively parallel sequencing, aCGH, and RNA-Seq technologies provide a comprehensive molecular diagnosis of Fanconi anemia. Blood. 2013;121(22):e138–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ameziane N, Sie D, Dentro S, et al. Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia: mutation analysis by next-generation sequencing. Anemia. 2012;2012: 132856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nia GE, Fadaee M, Royer R, et al. Profiling Fanconi anemia gene mutations among Iranian patients. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19:236–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Callén E, Tischkowitz MD, Creus A, et al. Quantitative PCR analysis reveals a high incidence of large intragenic deletions in the FANCA gene in Spanish Fanconi anemia patients. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1–4):341–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ianzano L, D’Apolito M, Centra M, et al. The genomic organization of the Fanconi Anemia Group A (FAA) gene. Genomics. 1997;41(3):309–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shukla P, Rao A, Ghosh K, et al. Identification of novel large intragenic deletion in a family with Fanconi anemia: first molecular report from India and review of literature. Gene. 2013;518(2):470–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bogliolo M, Pujol R, Aza-Carmona M, et al. Optimised molecular genetic diagnosis of Fanconi anaemia by whole exome sequencing and functional studies. J Med Genet. 2020;57(4):258–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon PJ, Margaret P, Rajendran R, et al. A case report and literature review of Fanconi anemia (FA) diagnosed by genetic testing. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Toksoy G, Alkaya DU, Bagirova G, Avcı Ş, Aghayev A, Günes N, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of Fanconi anemia patients in Turkey. Mol Syndromol. 2020;11(4):183–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nicchia E, Greco C, De Rocco D, et al. Identification of point mutations and large intragenic deletions in Fanconi anemia using next-generation sequencing technology. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2015;3(6):500–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Francies FZ, Wainwright R, Poole J, et al. Diagnosis of Fanconi anaemia by ionizing radiation- or mitomycin C-induced micronuclei. DNA Repair (Amst). 2018;61:17–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee HJ, Park S, Kang HJ, et al. A case report of Fanconi anemia diagnosed by genetic testing followed by prenatal diagnosis. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32(5):380–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tischkowitz MD, Morgan NV, Grimwade D, et al. Deletion and reduced expression of the Fanconi anemia FANCA gene in sporadic acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2004;18(3):420–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bottega R, Nicchia E, Capelli E, et al. Hypomorphic FANCA mutations correlate with mild mitochondrial and clinical phenotype in Fanconi anemia. Haematologica. 2018;103(3):417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morgan NV, Tipping AJ, Joenje H, et al. High frequency of large intragenic deletions in the Fanconi anemia group A gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65(5):1330–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nie D, Cao P, Wang F, et al. Analysis of overlapping heterozygous novel submicroscopic CNVs and FANCA-VPS9D1 fusion transcripts in a Fanconi anemia patient. J Hum Genet. 2019;64(9):899–909.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Levran O, Diotti R, Pujara K, et al. Spectrum of sequence variations in the FANCA gene: an international Fanconi anemia registry (IFAR) study. Hum Mutat. 2005;25(2):142–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Castella M, Pujol R, Callén E, et al. Origin, functional role, and clinical impact of Fanconi anemia FANCA mutations. Blood. 2011;117(14):3759–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tamary H, Dgany O, Toledano H, et al. Molecular characterization of three novel Fanconi anemia mutations in Israeli Arabs. Eur J Haematol. 2004;72(5):330–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the family for their participation in the study and for their consent to publish the data, including photographs.


The work was supported by Nicolaus Copernicus University statutory research grant nr. WL131 to AR. The grant provided the financial support for analysis and interpretation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AR and OH made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study, analysis, interpretation of data, and manuscript preparation. OH and JW made a substantial contribution to data acquisition and supervised the study. JS-S made a substantial contribution to acquisition of clinical data. KJ, EL, ABK, JS-S, DL and KC made a substantial contribution to analysis and interpretation of data. MMK made a substantial contribution to analysis and interpretation of data and manuscript preparation. MD contributed to the interpretation of data and manuscript preparation. All the authors were involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All the authors read and accepted the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Repczynska.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in compliance with all ethical research standards. Ethical approval was provided by the Ethics Committee of the Nicolaus Copernicus University. Consent to participate was obtained from all participants of the study and their parents (in case of children under 16 years old).

Consent for publication

Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants (and parents of children) of this study for publishing the clinical data, including the photographs.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Repczynska, A., Julga, K., Skalska-Sadowska, J. et al. Next-generation sequencing reveals novel variants and large deletion in FANCA gene in Polish family with Fanconi anemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 282 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Fanconi anemia
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Chromosome breakage test
  • aCGH
  • FANCA gene