Skip to main content

Physiotherapy for epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is characterized by skin fragility with blister formation occurring spontaneously or following minor trauma such as gentle pressure or friction. Current physiotherapy practice is based on anecdotal care, clinical expertise and creative problem solving with caregivers and individuals with EB. Evidence based intervention is needed to establish a foundation of knowledge and to guide international practitioners to create and improve standards of care to effectively work with individuals living with EB. This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was created for the purpose of providing evidence based interventions and best clinical practices for the physiotherapy management of individuals with EB. A survey was conducted within the EB community and six outcomes were identified as a priority to address in physiotherapy management, including (1) attaining developmental motor milestones, (2) identifying safe and functional mobility in the natural environment, (3) encouraging ambulation endurance, (4) supporting safe ability to bear weight, (5) improving access to physiotherapy services, and (6) optimizing interaction with the community. A systematic literature review was conducted and articles were critically analyzed by an international panel consisting of thirteen members: healthcare professionals (including physiotherapist, doctors, and occupational therapist), caregivers, and individuals with EB. Recommendations were formulated from evidence and panel consensus. An external panel of twelve were invited to improve the quality and gather feedback on draft manuscript and recommendations. This CPG describes the development of recommendations for physiotherapy management including several best practice interventions. This guideline lays the foundational work for physiotherapist throughout the world to provide high quality services while improving and maintaining functional mobility and independence within the EB community. The CPG outlines limitations in the evidence available and possible future research needed to improve physiotherapy practice.

Introduction

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by skin fragility with blister formation occurring spontaneously or following minor trauma such as gentle pressure or friction. Classification of EB is based on where the splitting occurs in the different layers of skin at a microscopic level. The four major types, subtypes and common areas affected that can lead to functional limitations are outlined in Table 1 [1].

Table 1 Classification of EB types and subtypes

The severity of the condition is dependent on the pathology in relation to its types and sub-types, and the depth at which the blisters form. Considerable variations exist in disease severity and the natural history of patients, within even a single EB subtype or related pathological occurrence, because of the influence of environmental and/or modifying genetic factors. Individuals with EB do present with a wide range of disabilities; the most severely affected may have scarring, fibrosis and contractures affecting any part of the body. Acute or chronic pain and pruritus are also impairments that can limit and affect each individual person’s overall development, including, but not limited to delays in gross motor skills, limitations in functional mobility and decreased functional capacity to participate as a member of their family and in the community [2]. When movement becomes uncomfortable and painful, it can lead to restriction of joints and thus affects functional activities and ultimately everyday life. Impact of mental health and wellness can also result in loss of functional capacity and ability to actively participate in society.

There is no cure for EB, therefore supportive care for relief of symptoms should be provided by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) whenever possible. A physiotherapist is an essential member of the IDT in treating individuals with EB.

Physiotherapy is the art and science of physical or corrective rehabilitation. This practice includes the promotion and maintenance of physical fitness to enhance the bodily movement related to health and wellness of individuals through the use of physiotherapy interventions. Physiotherapists assist with:

  • preventing disease, injury, and disability;

  • managing acute and chronic conditions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions;

  • improving and maintaining optimal functional independence and physical performance;

  • rehabilitating injury and the effects of disease or disability with therapeutic exercise programs and other interventions;

  • educating and planning maintenance and support programs to prevent re-occurrence, re-injury or functional decline.

Physiotherapy is anchored in movement sciences and aims to enhance or restore function of multiple body systems. They are committed to enhancing health, lifestyle and quality of life (QoL) in a holistic approach. Management commonly includes assistance with specific exercises, manual therapy, working with individuals to prevent loss of mobility, recommending assistive devices, encourage functional movement, and restoring maximum movement. Practice is typically guided by evidence-based interventions [3]. With the rare diagnosis of EB, there is limited research and resources available to physiotherapists.

Thus, current physiotherapy practices with individuals with EB are based on anecdotal care, clinical expertise and collaboration between caregiver and patient. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are needed to establish a foundation of knowledge to guide international practitioners to create and improve standards of care and to be able to work effectively with those living with the rare diagnosis of EB [2].

Objectives of this CPG were (a) to provide evidence based recommendations for the management of physiotherapy services for patients with EB, (b) to provide a CPG for any physiotherapists that might encounter a patient with EB for the first time and provide them with resources on justifying improved mobility, flexibility and strengthening activities to improve cardiovascular involvement so that patients with EB can improve their QoL and (c) to identify areas where there is lack of evidence and promote future physiotherapy research.

This guideline is aimed at physiotherapists, people with EB and their caregivers, rehabilitation practitioners, allied health professionals, nurses, occupational therapists (OTs), physicians/medical doctors, physician assistants, psychomotor therapists, nurse practitioners, social workers, educational staff and employers of individuals with EB. With intention to provide guideline recommendations to all subtypes of EB (Table 1) and all ages, we found these recommendations are more applicable to the severe recessive dystrophic EB population as there was limited research available to critically analyze for every EB subtype. Internationally, this has important implications for a physiotherapist to help enhance their proficiency in the functional treatment of people with EB, a condition requiring specialist intervention beyond just ‘being more careful’. They must avoid causing secondary injury by purposefully handling body and limbs strategically, avoid the use of highly adhesive tapes, dressings and felt padding, and by removing any adherent dressings, ideally with silicone spray. The recommendations can be generalized for people with EB and of all ages, who have the potential to experience, or are experiencing, physical limitations.

Method

In 2017, an international panel of 13 members was coordinated by DEBRA International through a voluntary membership. They represented physiotherapists, OT, nurses, dermatologists, parent/caregiver, person with EB, as experts (Additional file 1).

A scoping survey was created and focused on topics relevant to physiotherapists. The survey was distributed to health care providers working with patients with EB, caregivers, and people living with EB in the US, UK, Australia, Spain, and Croatia. The data (n = 33) informed the first meeting to identify the clinical questions and outcomes prioritized for the CPG. The meeting was held in Salzburg, Austria during the 2017 EB CLINET conference with eight in-person panel members, three panel members via teleconference and remaining panel members provided input through minutes.

A systematic literature review using eight search engines was conducted based on key terms, including years 1990 – 2020 with no language limits (Additional file 2)., A total of 64 articles were identified and filtered by title, abstract and diagnoses for potential inclusion regardless of study design (Fig. 1). Only articles pertaining to people with EB were selected. All articles were appraised in full by at least two appraisers for consistency. 18 articles were categorized based on outcomes with some articles overlapping in more than one outcome. Summary tables of all six outcomes were presented at the final meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, July 2018 for grading the strength of the recommendations. The CPG draft was circulated to an external panel of 12, to obtain feedback on the manuscript and recommendations (Additional file 1). The external panel consisted of EB stakeholders, who signed a roles and responsibility agreement, reported no conflicts of interest and volunteered through DEBRA International CPG Network or EB-CLINET. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) [4] II tool was consulted to increase the quality of practice guidelines in rare diseases. The panel addressed all reviewer comments in the final editing stage.

Fig. 1
figure1

Search and filtration results

Recommendations

The key recommendations with levels of evidence and grades of this guideline are summarized in Table 2. Detailed recommendations are outlined below.

Table 2 Summary of recommendations by outcome

Recommendation 1. We suggest consideration to optimize developmental motor milestone attainment (Strength of Recommendation: D).

Based on the evidence, we suggest that newborns and infants with EB receive developmental activities and positioning in order to optimize developmental motor milestone attainment from a physiotherapist. At birth and during prolonged hospitalizations, a physiotherapist, as a member of the IDT, can provide consultation for developmental activities and developmental positioning [7, 8]. Newborns and infants suspected or diagnosed with EB should be handled by gentle lifting through the ‘cradle carry’ technique to limit and prevent unnecessary shearing forces that could result in blistering. Infants should be lifted by placing one hand beneath the infant/child’s bottom and one hand behind the neck, rather than lifting from under the arms, to minimize friction and blister development in the trunk, axillary and arm areas [7]. Gross motor developmental milestones are an integral part of their physical growth. Daily prone lying is recommended for all infants with EB to help delay potential soft tissues shortening and adherence [9]. A physiotherapist can provide guidance for cautious placement of an infant into a modified and/or traditional prone position on soft surfaces, while reducing shearing forces. A physiotherapist should use standardized assessments and outcomes measures to identify baseline gross motor skills and to formulate intervention strategies if there are gross motor delays (Additional file 3). If there are no current gross motor delays observed, a physiotherapist can provide anticipatory guidelines for age appropriate gross motor developmental activities (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • Identify soft surfaces, such as double lined fabric or sheep skin, when cradling or carrying an infant in order to decrease shearing forces.

  • In addition to bandage wrapping, additional padding placed along the front of the knees and base of the palm can provide extra cushion to infants when they bear weight during crawling or creeping.

Recommendation 2. We suggest consideration to optimize safe and functional mobility in their natural environment (Strength of Recommendation: C).

For individuals with EB who are ambulatory and non-ambulatory, we suggest optimizing safe and functional mobility in their natural environment by providing mobility devices, enhancing functional activities, and endurance training through stretching, strengthening and balance exercises. Restrictions in joint and muscle movement due to blistering and repeated healing processes result in a shortened range of motion and can lead to permanent musculoskeletal abnormalities. These musculoskeletal abnormalities across the body would benefit from traditional physical therapy interventions, such as gait analysis, stretching exercises, strengthening activities, balance and coordination activities from clinicians who are familiar with EB [10, 11]. These exercises are taught to caregivers/parents and encouraged to be incorporated into daily life for functional and realistic application. A physiotherapist can provide direction on how to delay loss of functional independence prior to recommending use of durable medical equipment (DME) and continue to encourage regular activities for as long as possible. Identifying and incorporating personal and social purposes as one of the primary goals can facilitate individuals with EB to maintain mobility [11]. When the ability to independently interact with the community becomes compromised, begins to decline, or is impacted, a referral to a physiotherapist can be made to evaluate and assess the need for a mobility device. A physiotherapist can collaborate with a DME specialist(s) to identify the least restrictive mobility device for a patient’s current lifestyle with potential for growth modifications or for changes in function. When resources are limited, a physiotherapist can explain the purpose and provide examples of the least restrictive mobility devices to facilitate creative means out of local resources (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • Discuss wrapping techniques to facilitate rather than limit functional mobility/proper movement

  • When bandages cross the ankle joint, support a sub-talar joint neutral position and/or pull in direction of relative dorsiflexion to actively reduce the degree of plantarflexion contractures

Recommendation 3. We suggest consideration to optimize/enhance/elevate ambulation endurance and cardiorespiratory function (Strength of Recommendation: D).

For individuals with EB, a physiotherapist would educate on bone health, weight bearing activities, standing frames, balance and strengthening activities to optimize ambulation, endurance and cardiorespiratory function across an individual’s lifespan. Individuals with EB and significant contractures or palpable yet immeasurable tightness, should regularly participate in active exercises [9]. A physiotherapist can provide an individualized, progressive home exercise program that is incorporated into daily life on how to facilitate functional and endurance training activities as well as strengthen bones and muscles. Individuals with EB who are physically active usually have more autonomy and delayed wheelchair dependence [12]. Skin fragility, pain, joint contractures, and fatigue are some of many factors that contribute to immobility in this population [13]. Limited mobility has been shown to predict low bone mass in EB [14] and the level of mobility is a significant predictor of bone mineral content [15]. Patients with EB should be encouraged to maintain the highest level of weight-bearing activity that is tolerable [12, 13]. Another study showed that if RDEB individuals attained puberty, maintain mobility and optimize nutrition, it is possible to improve bone mass density while peak bone mass is being accrued [11]. Sporting activities have been recommended to strengthen muscles and bones and to improve overall QoL [12]. Continuing to maintain weight bearing activities as well as flexibility allows persons with EB to maintain and improve their cardiovascular function (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • Educate school personnel on the importance of continued ambulation versus utilizing a wheelchair when navigating school settings.

  • Educate adaptive physical education programs on the importance of continued ambulation versus utilizing wheelchair when navigating school settings.

Recommendation 4. We suggest consideration to optimize ability to safely bear weight (Strength of Recommendation: D).

We suggest to optimize the ability to safely bear weight, a physiotherapist will recommend biomechanically appropriate shoe attire and insole. Varying degrees of reported pain can affect functional mobility, ability to ambulate and footwear choices even in the mildest localized forms of EBS [16]. When blistering is provoked by use, the ability to walk can be significantly reduced [9]. A thorough physiotherapy evaluation is suggested to identify range of motion limitations, muscle power limits, skin integrity and trigger spots of friction to assess need for socks, orthotics and shoes. In collaboration with orthotists and/or podiatrists, suggestions for footwear can include items that will have as few internal seams as possible and will be made of soft material or be lined with sheepskin with a supportive sole to endure the natural environmental elements. In addition to shoes, the use of socks, such as silver-lined socks, that can conduct heat away from the feet, thereby cooling the feet and stopping the buildup of friction and pressure [17, 18]. Also, for individuals who do not wrap their lower extremity, wearing 2 pairs of thin breathable socks, with one worn on top of the other, can keep the layers of friction to a minimal amount within the shoe. This method helps to prevent friction between the skin and the shoes, especially when a person is walking or jogging [17]. Supportive orthotics to maintain foot and ankle alignment, along with proper footwear, will reduce shearing forces and friction leading to fewer blisters, allowing optimal ability to safely bear weight (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • An individualized assessment is important to guide the recommendation of footwear.

  • Discuss/share general characteristics of shoe types/footwear, sock material, and images of orthotics and prosthetics to allow local resources to be utilized in creating biomechanically appropriate footwear as well as engage the patient in their own personal preferences, as far as possible.

Recommendation 5. We suggest consideration to improve access to appropriate physiotherapy services (Strength of Recommendation: D).

By providing education regarding physiotherapy services to local healthcare providers, caregivers, parents and public, we suggest this will improve access to appropriate physiotherapy services. The complete care of patients with EB requires an IDT that includes physiotherapist as a core member [7, 11, 18,19,20]. Physical therapy must be started early in life, in particular in EBS with muscular dystrophy, generalized RDEB and JEB subtypes. The continuing work on muscles and joints delays contractures and deformities, improves functional mobility, enhances patient autonomy and ultimately ensures individuals with EB have a greater capacity for social integration with their peers. Static (preventive) and dynamic (corrective) orthosis, directed therapeutic exercises and recreational activities are empowering tools. Some forms of physical treatment, such as hydrotherapy, are also useful [20]. The IDT approach is often found in metropolitan areas and specialized EB centers. If such a center is not available, a dermatologist or pediatrician should coordinate with the various specialists via consultation. It is important to seek specialists who are familiar with EB. Knowledge sharing among physiotherapist to manage mobility [21] and reduce or avert musculoskeletal complications such as webbing and contractures would be beneficial to educate health care practitioners unfamiliar with EB or who practice in a rural area [19]. As EB is a rare diagnosis, a standard physiotherapy evaluation template is provided as a guideline (Additional file 4). In the case of JEB, 32% of providers recommended follow-up with a nutritionist or dietician with experience of EB every 3 to 6 months, whereas only 14% of providers recommended visits every 3 months with a physiotherapist or OT [19]. Prior to any hospital discharge, as well as depending on the country, the national and regional laws, there needs to be documentation that must address public health services to guarantee homecare by specialized services, including physiotherapist [20] (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • Educate the national and local physiotherapy organizations and chapters about EB

  • Physiotherapists to provide education to EB nurses at EB Centers and Wound Care Teams

  • Knowledge share with DEBRA International CPG Network to collaborate with primary physicians (i.e.: Family medicine, pediatricians, and general dermatologists and subspecialists, such as orthopedic and gastroenterologist)

  • Knowledge share information with National Organization of Rare Diseases (NORD)

Recommendation 6. We suggest to optimize interaction with environment (Strength of Recommendation: D).

To optimize interaction with their environment, a physiotherapist should provide intervention by assessing appropriate positioning and posture using lower extremity bracing and splinting, seating and mobility options for individuals with EB [25]. Physiotherapists evaluate and examine current movement patterns and body positioning within the environmental set up to assess and recommend the least restrictive and most supportive durable medical equipment, splints and/or orthotics to enhance interaction within the home and community. For individuals with DEB, physiotherapists collaborate with orthotists, prosthetists, podiatrists and vendors who specializes in durable medical equipment to improve their functional interaction within their environment [22]. Prosthesis for upper extremities can support continued activities of daily living to enhance QoL, such as driving to work [22]. For lower extremity prosthesis, the physiotherapist can focus on upright weight bearing therapeutic activities to improve ambulation within the home and community with or without the use of assistive devices [23]. When orthotics, prosthetics or durable medical equipment become ineffective at enriching or maintaining functional activities, a re-evaluation by a physiotherapist would be recommended to identify changes in the musculoskeletal system or cardiovascular system before addressing changes to the durable medical equipment (Table 2).

Expert practice points

  • Consider circumference of foot and ankle with bandages and/or layers of socks when recommending size of orthotics.

  • During painful wound healing phases that limit functional mobility, physiotherapists advise utilizing a manual or power wheelchair to continue to optimize interactions within the environment.

  • Tricycles for children and adults, as well as mobilized scooters, are another alternative to wheelchairs that can provide independence, strengthening, increased endurance and social interaction in the community.

The recommendation summary has been grouped by age if the recommendation refers to a specific age level, see Table 2. Infants are defined as birth to 12 months, children are defined as 1 year to pre-pubescent and adults are defined as post-pubescent. The majority of the articles were graded level 3, being small-scale case studies or level 4 for expert opinion, and with one article graded level 1. All recommendations were regarded as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group. Subtype specific recommendations are identified in Table 2 when the population sample is referenced by the evidence in the article.

Conclusion

Individuals with EB can present to physiotherapy services with a wide range of deficits, including but not limited to joint contractures, strength and balance deficits, inability to bear weight, poor endurance, durable medical equipment needs, and pain that can lead to decreased functional interactions as an active participant in their family and within their community. Physiotherapy is an integral part of the IDT who evaluates and assesses gross motor developmental skills, impairments that limit functional movement within the home and community, weight bearing skills, durable medical equipment needs, endurance and education based on movement sciences. When not in active disease state, encourage physical and weight bearing activities to facilitate healthy bone mineral accrual [24]. This CPG provides evidence based recommendations to the physiotherapist who can safely address functional movement concerns with the EB community. It also outlines areas where more evidence is needed to improve physiotherapy management in EB (Table 3).

Table 3 Identifies deficits in Physiotherapy research by outcome

CPGs in rare conditions have many challenges and limitations descending from small numbers of patient participation in studies to offer robust evidence. This results in a lack of good quality studies in therapies, such as physiotherapy in EB. This leads to a greater need for expert and clinical knowledge to be incorporated, but often there is limited and uneven distribution of knowledge, expertise and lack of EB-specializing professionals. In addition, our panel is predominately from pediatrics EB services as we found it rare for physiotherapists to specialize in adult EB services. 2020 also presented with the added difficulties of COVID 19 and reduced clinical capacity of many EB specialist physiotherapists, doctors and nurses, which did have an impact on getting more review panel members.

Future research

Overall, the development of a physiotherapy management in EB handbook would be a beneficial tool with practical applications in the clinic setting. Table 3 details the possible specific research in areas where there is limited evidence.

Updating and dissemination

It is anticipated that a literature search for new evidence pertaining to the provision of physiotherapy in EB will be undertaken every 3–5 years after the publication in order to update the guidelines. The CPG will be hosted by DEBRA international website (https://www.debra-international.org/eb-healthcare-resources) to ensure their availability and dissemination to clinicians, caregivers, and people with EB worldwide. DEBRA International recommends that the implementation of the CPG recommendations should be monitored and evaluated through audits. DEBRA International has designed a pre-implementation survey to help (https://surveyhero.com/c/aabc0100).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities of daily living

AGREE:

Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation

BMD:

Bone mineral density

CASP:

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme

CPG/CPGs:

Clinical practice guideline(s)

DDEB:

Dominant dystrophic EB

DME:

Durable medical equipment

EB:

Epidermolysis bullosa

EBS:

EB simplex

DEB:

Dystrophic EB

GI:

Gastrointestinal

GRADE:

Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation

IDT:

Interdisciplinary team

JEB:

Junctional EB

KEB:

Kindler EB

MDT:

Multidisciplinary team

NORD:

National Organization of Rare Diseases

OT/OTs:

Occupational therapist(s)

QoL:

Quality of life

RDEB:

Recessive dystrophic EB

SIGN:

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network

References

  1. 1.

    Has C, Bauer JW, Bodemer C, Bolling MC, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Diem A, et al. Consensus reclassification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa and other disorders with skin fragility. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:614–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18921.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chan JM, Weisman A, King A, Maksomski S, Shotwell C, Bailie C, et al. Occupational therapy for epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). Guide to Physical Therapist Practice: Guide 3.0 Revisions 2016. http://guidetoptpractice.apta.org/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  4. 4.

    Brouwers M, Kho M, Browman G, Burgers J, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J. 2010. https://www.agreetrust.org/. Accessed 7 Jun 2020.

  5. 5.

    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 50 Guideline Developer’s Handbook, NHS Revised Edition updated in 2015;1–19. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2018.

  6. 6.

    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/. Accessed 15 Feb 2016.

  7. 7.

    Gonzalez ME. Evaluation and treatment of the newborn with epidermolysis bullosa. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li AW, Prindaville B, Bateman ST, Gibson TE, Wiss K. Inpatient management of children with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a review. Pediatr Dermatol. 2017;34:647–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mullet F. Physiotheray for epidermolysis bullosa. Physiotherapy. 1990;76:660–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fine J-D, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Stein A, Cash S, DeLeoz J, et al. Pseudosyndactyly and musculoskeletal contractures in inherited epidermolysis bullosa: experience of the national epidermolysis bullosa registry, 1986–2002. J Hand Surg. 2005;30:14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hubbard LD, Mayre-Chilton K. Retrospective longitudinal study of osteoporosis in adults with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7:58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cohn HI, Teng JMC. Advancement in management of epidermolysis bullosa. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:507–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bruckner AL, Bedocs LA, Keiser E, Tang JY, Doernbrack C, Arbuckle HA, et al. Correlates of low bone mass in children with generalized forms of epidermolysis bullosa. JAAD. 2011;65:1001–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fu T, Lingala B, Kent K, Bachrach LK, Bruckner AL. Patterns of bone mineral acquisition in children with epidermolysis bullosa: a longitudinal study. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:1081–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fewtrell MS, Allgrove J, Gordon I, Brain C, Atherton D, Harper J, et al. Bone mineralization in children with epidermolysis bullosa. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:959–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brun J, Chiaverini C, Devos C, Leclerc-Mercier S, Mazereeuw J, Bourrat E, et al. Pain and quality of life evaluation in patients with localized epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Khan MT. Podiatric management in epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol Clin. 2010;28:325–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Khan MT, O’Sullivan M, Faitli B, Mellerio JE, Fawkes R, Wood M, et al. Foot care in epidermolysis bullosa: evidence-based guideline. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:593–604.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ahmad R-CS, Bruckner AL. A survey of epidermolysis bullosa care in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31:169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    El Hachem M, Zambruno G, Bourdon-Lanoy E, Ciasulli A, Buisson C, Hadj-Rabia S, et al. Multicentre consensus recommendations for skin care in inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bedocs LA, Bruckner AL. Vertebral compression fractures in two pediatric patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25:657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Verduyn C, Morren M-A, Stas M, Sinnaeve F, Segers K, Kiekens C. Successful forearm prosthesis fitting in a patient with epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica: case report. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42:254–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Thevenon A, Preud’homme M, Patenotre P, Catteau B, Blanchard-Dauphin A, Wieczorek V, et al. Leg amputation and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a case report with 15 years of follow-up. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:833–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kang M, Chen JSC, Radjenovic M, Yang A, Feng GHY, Murrell DF. An analysis of the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a cross-sectional study. Exp Dermatol. 2021;00:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pope E, Lara-Corrales I, Mellerio J, Martinez A, Schultz G, Burrell R, et al. A consensus approach to wound care in epidermolysis bullosa. JAAD. 2012;67:904–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following individuals and organizations for providing support and input into these guidelines. DEBRA International; DEBRA of AMERICA; Kattya Mayre-Chilton, PhD, RD, Clinical Practice Guideline Coordinator, DEBRA International; Review panel; Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa and their caregivers. All authors volunteered their time in the formation and completion of this project.

Funding

This guideline was funded by DEBRA of America and endorsed by DEBRA International. The views or interest of the funding body have not influenced the final recommendations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AW—scoping survey, methodology training, CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, CPG synthesis of findings, CPG writing and editing. JMC—methodology training, CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, methodologist, CPG synthesis of findings, CPG writing and editing. CLP-CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, manuscript writing and panel review. KSj—CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, and panel review. KSt—CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting. KA—CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, and panel review. SW—CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion, and panel review. RB—CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion and recommendations meeting, and panel review. MW-CPG PICO meeting, literature searches and review, study appraisals, CPG inclusion, manuscript writing and panel review. JSA—CPG PICO meeting, and panel review. ACR—CPG PICO meeting, CPG inclusion, and panel review. BF—CPG PICO meeting, and panel review. PK—CPG PICO meeting, and panel review. (Additional file 1). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Weisman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The working panel members and external reviewers declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the publication of this guideline. No one involved in the guideline has any connection to manufacturers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Panel roles and contribution and external review panel

Additional file 2

: PICO, Key Terms and Search Engines

Additional file 3

: Standardized Assessments and Outcome Measures

Additional file 4

: Physiotherapy Evaluation Template for persons with EB

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weisman, A., Chan, J.M., LaPointe, C. et al. Physiotherapy for epidermolysis bullosa: clinical practice guidelines. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16, 406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01997-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Physiotherapy
  • Physical therapist
  • Epidermolysis bullosa
  • Mobility
  • Weight bearing
  • Motor development
  • Clinical practice guideline