Skip to main content

Assessment of tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders using the MINI-KID tool: a pediatric case–control study



The tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) have not previously been studied in China. We aimed to assess the psychiatric level of individuals with TAND using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children (MINI-KID) in China.


A total of 83.16% of individuals (79/95) had at least one TAND, and 70.53% (67/95) had an intellectual disability. The MINI-KID tool diagnosed 16 neuropsychiatric diseases, the most common of which were attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (51.58%, 49/95) and social anxiety disorder (30.53%, 29/95). The number of children with psychiatric diseases in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) group was significantly greater than the number in the typically developing group (P < 0.0001). Notably, 69.47% (66/95) had two or more psychiatric disorders. Pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) was often co-morbid with other psychiatric disorders.


This study used the structured and systematic MINI-KID scale to determine the diagnosis of psychiatric co-morbidities in a relatively large sample, suggesting a higher rate. By comparing the status of individuals with TSC with typically developing children, the results suggests that neuropsychiatric co-morbidities are significantly higher in individuals with TSC. Research has revealed the frequent presence of two, three or more neuropsychiatric diseases in individuals with TSC.


Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease characterized by the formation of hamartomas in multiple organ systems with various symptoms and degrees of severity. The currently known pathogenic genes are the TSC1 (9q34) and TSC2 (16p13.3) genes [1]. In addition to the physical manifestations in multiple organs, children with TSC may also suffer from a wide array of neurodevelopmental, behavioral, psychiatric, and psychosocial difficulties. The Neuropsychiatry Panel proposed the term TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) as an umbrella term to include the full range of mental health issues. The panel defined six levels of investigation: behavioral, psychiatric, intellectual, academic, neuropsychological, and psychosocial levels [2, 3] Neurological and psychiatric complications and kidney disease are often the greatest burdens imposed by TSC, but TAND have not received enough attention [4,5,6]. A 2010 survey of members of the British Tuberous Sclerosis Association revealed that only 18% of individuals with TSC had been assessed or treated for neuropsychiatric disorders [7]. With the exception of the TOSCA study investigating a larger sample size of 1400 children (possibly including some Chinese pediatric participants) [8], very few studies have assessed the rate and pattern of TAND in children with TSC and none have been reported in China [9].

As a simple, reliable and effective interview, the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children (MINI-KID) was developed based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) and International Classification of Disease, 10th version (ICD-10) criteria for the assessment and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders [10]. The study uses a structured tool (MINI-KID), intelligence quotient (IQ) measures and typically developing control sample to outline the profile of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with TSC [10,11,12,13]. This study will provide a systematic assessment of the rate of psychiatric disorders in children with TSC.


Study population

This study was carried out from September 2019 to November 2019. Children with TSC were recruited from among all individuals with TSC aged 6–16 years who were treated in the Department of Neurology at the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Children’s Medical Center. All individuals met the latest diagnostic criteria for tuberous sclerosis [2] and were examined for mutations in the TSC1/TSC2 genes. The exclusion criterion was refusal to participate.

We also recruited children with typical development as the control group in the health examination center of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University and matched them by age and sex. The criteria for children with typical development were as follows: (1) typical motor and language development; (2) no history of seizures or other neurological diseases; (3) no other chronic diseases (such as diabetes, asthma or cancer); and (4) no first-degree relatives with a family history of mental illness. The exclusion criterion was parental refusal to provide informed consent. Children with typical development were screened by the deputy chief physician and attending physician of the neurology department, who each had more than 5 years of experience.

Written informed consent was received from all participating families. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University.

Data collection

Standardized questionnaire

After providing informed consent, parents or guardians were invited to participate in interviews, and standardized questionnaires were used to obtain demographic and clinical data. The demographic data collected were the date of birth, sex, ethnicity, parental education level, family income, and residence. The cognitive assessment was conducted using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children in Chinese (WISC-C). The clinical data collected were growth and development, family history, age at onset of epilepsy, duration of epilepsy, current number of antiepileptic drugs, frequency of seizures, spasm, and TSC clinical manifestations.

MINI-KID (parent version)

Parents or guardians of the children with TSC were interviewed using the MINI-KID (parent version) for children and adolescents. The Chinese version of the MINI-KID (parent version) 5.0 was translated by Liu Y.X. and other researchers from Peking University Institute of Mental Health in 2010. The study by Liu Y.X. and other studies have confirmed that the Chinese version of the MINI-KID (parent version) has good reliability and validity [14] and that the parent version is more sensitive than the child version [15, 16].

The MINI-KID is a structured diagnostic scale designed according to the DSM-IV and the ICD-10. The scale has 25 modules to diagnose 24 mental illnesses and suicidal tendencies in children and adolescents between the ages of 6 and 16 years [10, 13]. Each module includes a screening questionnaire and a diagnostic questionnaire. The MINI-KID was administered by highly trained neurologists (minimum 5 years of experience in the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric diseases in children) in this study, and the diagnosis was based solely on whether the responses to the screening questions were positive. All questions had a “yes/no” response format [10, 13]. The assessment took approximately 30–45 min to complete. As a preliminary exploration of MINI-KID in the context of TAND, our diagnosis was based on whether the diagnostic criteria of MINI-KID were met, and therefore some of the results may not reflect final diagnoses provided by expert psychiatric evaluations.

All parents of children participating in this study were administered the questionnaire face-to-face after signing the informed consent form.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as the means and standard deviations (SD). Continuous variables were analyzed using the ANOVA F-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed with each TAND risk factors as an independent variable. Those known risk or protective factors for TAND were included in our regression analysis. We adjusted for sex (male/female), maternal education (years) (≤ 9/9–12/ > 12), paternal education (years) (≤ 9/9–12/ > 12), family income (RMB) (< 5000/5000–10,000/ > 10,000) and residence (suburban or rural/urban) in the adjusted model. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was statistically significant. All analyses were performed using JMP Pro 15.0.0 software (version 15.0.0, SAS Institute Inc., USA).


Characteristics of the study population

Our TSC cohort included 291 individuals, of which 117 (40.21%) were 6–16 years old. Sixteen people declined to participate and 86.32% (101/117) parents signed the informed consent form, but 6 individuals did not complete all the questionnaires (withdrew halfway). Ninety-five individuals (81.20%, 95/117) completed the questionnaire, including 46 females (48.42%) and 49 males (51.58%), whose average age was 10.02 ± 3.10 years. All participants were of the Han ethnicity (Table 1). In addition, 95 children with typical development (males:females = 51:44, age 10.3 ± 2.4 years) were recruited (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic comparison of patients with TSC and normal controls

All 95 children were genetically tested, and the TSC1:TSC2:NMI (no mutation identified) ratio was 27:58:10. More sporadic cases were identified than familial cases (n = 55 VS n = 40). Sixty-seven children had an intellectual disability (ID) (IQ ≤ 70) (70.53%), 34 (35.79%) had mild to moderate ID (IQ 35–70), and 33 (34.74%) had severe ID (IQ < 35). Of the 95 children, 76 had a history of epilepsy (80.00%), and 49 of the individuals with TSC and epilepsy developed drug-resistant epilepsy (64.47%). The average age at seizure onset was 2.50 ± 3.59 years, and the duration was 7.65 ± 4.37 years. Eighty-seven individuals had cortical tubers, 86 children had subependymal nodules (SENs), and 3 individuals had subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA).

Rate of neuropsychiatric disorders in individuals with TSC and typically developing controls

Seventy-nine (83.16%) children with TSC developed TAND. Among children with TAND, the male: female ratio was 41:38. Sixteen neuropsychiatric diseases were diagnosed, the most common of which was attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (51.58%, 49/95), followed by social anxiety disorder (30.53%, 29/95), panic disorder (26.32%, 25/95), specific phobia (26.32%, 25/95), pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) (22.11%, 21/95), (mild) manic episodes (22.11%, 21/95), agoraphobia (16.84%, 16/95), tic disorder (15.79%, 15/95) and separation anxiety disorder (10.53%, 10/95) (Additional file 1: Table S1). The rates of ADHD, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, specific phobia, PDD, (mild) manic episodes, agoraphobia, tic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, major depressive episode, suicide and obsessive–compulsive disorder were significantly different between the TSC and control groups (P < 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Among individuals with TSC, 69.47% had two or more TAND. The rates of psychiatric disorders in participants with different levels of ID are shown in Table 2. Except for social anxiety disorder, ADHD and PDD, no significant difference in the prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders was observed after stratification by intellectual development level. The co-morbidity of neuropsychiatric disorders for each individual is presented as a heat map (Fig. 1). The heat map presents these disorders in individuals with different levels of intellectual development. PDD was often co-morbid with other diseases (one, two and three co-morbidities in nine, four and five participants, respectively). The most frequent co-morbidities included ADHD, tic disorder, specific phobia and (mild) manic episodes.

Table 2 Distribution of neuropsychiatric disorders in individuals with different levels of ID
Fig. 1

Heat map analysis of 16 psychiatric disorders in 95 individuals. Among the 16 mental disorders, red = “yes”, green = “no”; among the intellectual developmental disorders, green = “no ID”, red = “mild to moderate ID”, and black = “severe ID”. ID intellectual disability, MDD major depressive episode, MME (mild) manic episodes, PD panic disorder, SeAD separation anxiety disorder, SoAD social anxiety disorder, SP specific phobia, OCD obsessive–compulsive disorder, PSD posttraumatic stress disorder, TD tic disorder, ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, CD conduct disorder, ODD oppositional defiant disorder, PDD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

A total of 85.19% (23/27) of individuals in the TSC1 gene mutation group, 84.48% (49/58) in the TSC2 gene mutation group and 70.00% (7/10) in the NMI group had neuropsychiatric disorders, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.546). The rates of psychiatric disorders in individuals with different genotypes are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Analysis of TAND-related risk factors

Ninety-five children with TSC were divided into the TAND group (n = 79) and without TAND group (n = 16). After adjustment for sex, parents’ education, family income (RMB) (< 5000/5000–10,000/ > 10,000) and residence, the multivariate logistic regression models found that an earlier age of onset (< 2 years) (P = 0.03), more frequent seizure frequency (more than once a month) (P = 0.04) and use of a greater number of antiepileptic drugs (≥ 2) (P = 0.04) were closely related to the occurrence of TAND (Additional file 3: Table S3, Additional file 4: Table S4). No significant correlation was observed with neoplastic diseases (RAML, LAM and cardiac rhabdomyomas), cortical tubers, SENs, or SEGA (P > 0.05) (Additional file 3: Table S3).


To our knowledge, this cross-sectional study of TAND using the MINI-KID is the first to be conducted, and it is also the TAND cohort study with the largest sample performed in China. The rate of neuropsychiatric disorders in children with TSC is significantly higher than in individuals with typical neurodevelopment. Consistent with previous studies, TAND is present in childhood and adolescence [3, 5, 17, 18]. The lifetime prevalence of TAND is approximately 90% [3]. Anxiety, depression, and ADHD are more common in individuals with TSC [18]. In our cohort, 77 children with TSC had neuropsychiatric disorders, for a rate of 81.05%, which far exceeded our expectations. However, clinicians pay far less attention to mental illnesses than neurological disorders (such as epilepsy and SEGA). As reported in previous studies, less than 40% of the more than 2000 individuals from 31 countries underwent an intelligence assessment, and the proportion of missing TAND data is high. Thus, TAND are not adequately identified and processed, even at TSC specialty centers [18]. Our study suggests that the disease burden of TSC is far greater than previously realized, which will serve as a basis for a better distribution of medical resources.

According to Prather and de Vries et al. [19, 20], autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and ADHD are the most common TAND in children, and anxiety/mood disorders are the most common in adults. The incidence of ADHD has varied from 30 to 60%, based on the study method and diagnostic criteria [21,22,23,24]. The MINI-KID serves as a short, standardized, universal assessment tool to systematically assess parent reports of health-related neuropsychiatric disorders in children with chronic diseases [25,26,27]. To our knowledge, this report is the first application of the MINI-KID tool in a TSC cohort to accurately screen and diagnose TAND. We found that ADHD, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder and specific phobia were the most common disorders in this group. The rate of ADHD in our cohort was significantly higher than that in the TOSCA cohort (51.58% vs. 22.4%) [8], and we suggest several possible explanations below. (1) The age distribution of children in the TOSCA cohort was 0–18 years old, while the age distribution of children in our cohort was 6–16 years old, consistent with the high rate age of ADHD diagnosis. (2) Our cohort included individuals with TSC from all over the country. In some areas, a comprehensive and systematic treatment standard has not been established, and clinicians do not even know enough about TAND to intervene in a timely manner. (3) Unlike the TAND Checklist method adopted by the TOSCA study, the MINI-KID tool was used for both screening and diagnosis in our cohort.

Although the rate of anxiety was very high in previous cohorts [8, 17, 18], the diagnosis rate of anxiety was lower in our study (25.80–56.00% vs. 10.53%), while the rate of depression was approximately the same (8.20% vs. 6.32%). In the future, clinicians should focus on screening children for emotional disorders and anxiety responses. Our results are comparable to those of a cohort study of 32 samples in Italy [9].

Interestingly, in our study, we identified a number of psychiatric disorders that were uncommon or unreported in previous TAND studies, such as (mild) manic episodes, oppositional defiant disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder. We found and reported this phenomenon. We did not consider PDD as a confounder because these individuals had relevant clinical manifestations and did not meet the diagnostic criteria for PDD in the MINI-KID. These disorders are rare but had a sufficiently high rate to draw our attention to psychiatric disorders other than the common TAND.

We sought to identify the risk factors associated with the occurrence of TAND and found that an earlier onset age (< 2 years), a longer seizure duration (≥ 2 years), more frequent seizures (more than 1 seizure per month), and the use of more antiepileptic drugs (≥ 2) are closely related to the occurrence of TAND. These findings are similar to previous studies [8, 17, 19].

In view of the high prevalence of TAND in children with TSC, this study focused on drawing the attention of pediatric neurologists to TAND for the early screening and diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders. Individuals with a confirmed diagnosis will be referred to the relevant psychiatrist.

The Neuropsychiatry Panel offers the TAND Checklist, a simple framework for a conversation about TAND [3], to make TAND screening easy and convenient. It is a screening tool (not a diagnostic tool like the MINI-KID) that assesses all levels of TAND (not only psychiatric). It would therefore be of potential value to work with the developers of the TAND Checklist to translate and authorize the TAND Checklist for use in Chinese populations, and a potentially very informative approach would be to use the MINI-KID to validate the psychiatric level of the TAND Checklist using the Chinese sample presented here.

This study has several limitations. MINI-KID is a classification, not a comprehensive diagnosis; it is not based on ICD-11/DSM-5. It does not group co-occurring conditions and does not have a hierarchy for diagnostic classification. It only examines the psychiatric level of TAND and not the many other levels as outlined in the TAND construct and TAND Checklist. The present study was a cross-sectional study of a single center, and future multicenter prospective studies are needed to further verify the results. In addition, this study used only one method to explore the mental health of children with TSC and did not use the TAND Checklist for comparison. The study population included children aged 6–16 years and excluded younger children. At the National Children’s Medical Center, we may have a biased sample of children with TSC (higher prevalence of epilepsy and drug-refractory epilepsy, and altered intellectual development).


This study used the structured and systematic MINI-KID scale to determine the diagnosis of psychiatric co-morbidities in a relatively large sample, suggesting their higher rate. By comparing the status of individuals with TSC with typically developing children, the results suggest a significantly higher rate of neuropsychiatric co-morbidities in individuals with TSC. Moreover, individuals with TSC often present with two, three or more neuropsychiatric diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.



Tuberous sclerosis complex


Tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders


Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children


Intellectual disability


No mutation identified


Subependymal nodules


Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma


Renal angiomyolipoma




Pervasive developmental disorder


Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder


Antiepileptic drugs


Autistic spectrum disorder


  1. 1.

    Henske EP, Jóźwiak S, Kingswood JC, Sampson JR, Thiele EA. Tuberous sclerosis complex. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Northrup H, Krueger DA. Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(4):243–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    de Vries PJ, Whittemore VH, Leclezio L, Byars AW, Dunn D, Ess KC, et al. Tuberous sclerosis associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) and the TAND checklist. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52(1):25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ding Y, Wang J, Zhou Y, Yu L, Zhang L, Zhou S, et al. Quality of life in children with tuberous sclerosis complex: a pediatric cohort study. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27(3):280–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Curatolo P, Moavero R, de Vries PJ. Neurological and neuropsychiatric aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(7):733–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ding Y, Wang J, Zhou S, Zhou Y, Zhang L, Yu L, et al. Genotype and phenotype analysis of chinese children with tuberous sclerosis complex: a pediatric cohort study. Front Genet. 2020;11:204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    de Vries PJ, Hunt A, Bolton PF. The psychopathologies of children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): a postal survey of UK families. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;16(1):16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Vries PJ, Belousova E, Benedik MP, Carter T, Cottin V, Curatolo P, et al. TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND): findings from the TOSCA natural history study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Toldo I, Brasson V, Miscioscia M, Pelizza MF, Manara R, Sartori S, et al. Tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders: a paediatric cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018.

  10. 10.

    Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Duncan L, Georgiades K, Wang L, Van Lieshout RJ, MacMillan HL, Ferro MA, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). Psychol Assess. 2018;30(7):916–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Högberg C, Billstedt E, Björck C, Björck PO, Ehlers S, Gustle LH, et al. Diagnostic validity of the MINI-KID disorder classifications in specialized child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, Janavs J, Bannon Y, Rogers JE, et al. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(3):313–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu YX, Liu J, Wang YF. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (Parent Version). Chin Ment Health J. 2010;25(1):921–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu YX, Liu J, Wang YF. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (Child Version). Chin Ment Health J. 2011;25(1):8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Van Lieshout RJ, Savoy CD, Ferro MA, Krzeczkowski JE, Colman I. Macrosomia and psychiatric risk in adolescence. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;29(11):1537–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    de Vries PJ, Wilde L, de Vries MC, Moavero R, Pearson DA, Curatolo P. A clinical update on tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178(3):309–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kingswood JC, d’Augères GB, Belousova E, Ferreira JC, Carter T, Castellana R, et al. TuberOus SClerosis registry to increase disease Awareness (TOSCA)—baseline data on 2093 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Prather P, de Vries PJ. Behavioral and cognitive aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Neurol. 2004;19(9):666–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    de Vries PJ, Gardiner J, Bolton PF. Neuropsychological attention deficits in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(3):387–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hunt A. Development, behaviour and seizures in 300 cases of tuberous sclerosis. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1993;37(Pt 1):41–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gillberg IC, Gillberg C, Ahlsén G. Autistic behaviour and attention deficits in tuberous sclerosis: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36(1):50–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Muzykewicz DA, Newberry P, Danforth N, Halpern EF, Thiele EA. Psychiatric comorbid conditions in a clinic population of 241 patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;11(4):506–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    D’Agati E, Moavero R, Cerminara C, Curatolo P. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Neurol. 2009;24(10):1282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mordal J, Gundersen O, Bramness JG. Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(3):172–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pettersson A, Modin S, Wahlström R, Af Winklerfelt Hammarberg S, Krakau I. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is useful and well accepted as part of the clinical assessment for depression and anxiety in primary care: a mixed-methods study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    van Vliet IM, de Beurs E. The MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. A brief structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV en ICD-10 psychiatric disorders. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2007;49(6):393–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We gratefully acknowledge the participants and their parents who were included in our study for their support. We particularly thank Dr. X. Wang for providing statistical support.


This study was supported by grants from the Omics-based precision medicine of epilepsy entrusted by the Key Research Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0904400).

Author information




YFD and YW designed the research. YFD, JW and SZZ interviewed the individuals and collected patient clinical records. HZ and TLL collected and analyzed data from healthy children. YFD and YW designed the analysis and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University Institutional Review Board prior to the recruitment of subjects (2018-No.26).

Consent for publication

All presentations of case reports have received consent for publication.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Distribution of neuropsychiatric disorders in individuals with TSC and typically developing controls.

Additional file 2.

Distribution of neuropsychiatric disorders in individuals with different genotypes.

Additional file 3.

Analysis of factors associated with the TAND incidence.

Additional file 4.

Risk factors associated with TAND.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, H. et al. Assessment of tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders using the MINI-KID tool: a pediatric case–control study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16, 181 (2021).

Download citation


  • TSC
  • TAND
  • Child
  • ADHD
  • Psychiatric disorders