Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hydroxyurea and blood transfusion therapy for Sickle cell disease in South Asia: inconsistent treatment of a neglected disease

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 16, Article number: 148 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hydroxyurea and blood transfusion therapies remain the main therapeutic strategies for Sickle cell disease. Preliminary data suggest substantial variation and inconsistencies in practice of these two therapeutic modalities in South Asia. In this systematic review we searched Medline, Cochrane library and Scopus for articles on usage of hydroxyurea and blood transfusion therapies for sickle cell disease in South Asia published in English between October 2005 and October 2020.

Results

We selected 41 papers: 33 from India, 3 from Sri Lanka, 2 each from Pakistan and Bangladesh and one from Nepal. Only 14 prospective trials focused on hydroxyurea therapy from which majority (n = 10; 71.4%) adopted fixed low dose (10 mg/kg/day) regimen. With hydroxyurea therapy, 12 and 9 studies reported significant reductions in vaso-occlusive crises and transfusion requirement respectively. Severe anaemia (haemoglobin level < 6–7 g/dl) was the commonest indicator (n = 8) for transfusion therapy followed by vaso-occlusive crisis.

Conclusions

Published data on the hydroxyurea and transfusion therapies in South Asia are limited and heterogeneous. A clear gap of knowledge exists about the nature of the sickle cell disease in the Indian subcontinent particularly from countries outside India necessitating further evidence-based assessments and interventions.

Background

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the commonest monogenic disorder characterized by a single mutation in the gene encoding for β-globin chain (HBB). The prevalence of the disease is high in sub-Saharan region of Africa, parts of Mediterranean, India and in the Middle East [1]. Remarkable variability of the clinical severity of SCD is widely acknowledged. The phenotypic variability could extend from those with very mild disease where patients may lead life without any need for treatment to individuals with severe complicated disease with multiple disabling symptoms leading to premature death [2]. Five classical HBB haplotypes of SCD (Central African Republic, Benin, Senegal, Cameroon and Arab-Indian) have also described and are widely believed to contribute to the phenotypic variability largely through their effects on foetal haemoglobin (Hb F) levels [3]. Irrespective of the haplotype, evidence suggests that poverty influenced by lower socio-economic status could lead to adverse outcomes in the disease [4, 5]. In the western world, more than 90% of children with SCD survive to adulthood whilst in Sub-Saharan Africa where there is the greatest burden of sickle cell anaemia estimates suggest that 50–80% of patients will die before adulthood [2].

In South Asia, the highest prevalence of the SCD is observed in India, where over 20 million patients with the disease are known to live. The burden of the disease in India is estimated to be second only to that of Africa with the highest frequency of βs allele being found in a belt stretching across central India, from South-eastern Gujarat to South-western Odisha [6]. Although SCD has been reported from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and the Maldives, very little is known about the nature of SCD and the burden of the disease in these countries. There are few survival and mortality studies from South Asia. In a study conducted in Gujarat in India, about 20% of children with SCD died by age of two and 30% of children with SCD from tribal areas were noted to die before they come reached adulthood [7].

Several preventive and treatment approaches are available for management of SCD. Though no all-encompassing single guideline for management of SCD exists, expert committees have developed several guidelines on trial-based evidence and best practices [8,9,10]. These guidelines largely do not take into consideration the genotype nor the locality in which the patient is being treated.

Currently available treatment options for SCD include using of disease-modifying therapies like hydroxyurea (HU), blood transfusion and for a very few patients using near curative treatments like hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and gene therapy. Supportive and preventive strategies like daily oral prophylactic penicillin up to the age of 5 years, opioid therapy to relief acute pain related to sickling event, non-opioid analgesics for chronic pain related to sickling and yearly Trans Cranial Doppler (TCD) examination from the ages 2–16 years to identify those who are vulnerable for stroke form the back bone of any management strategy [8, 11]. In addition, voxeloter, L-glutamine and crizanlizumab have all been approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently, and are likely to expand the future therapeutics option for SCD [12].

The two main strategies of SCD management, namely HU and blood transfusion are used based on specific requirements. Blood transfusion therapy has been used for patients with SCD expecting that the normal haemoglobin would compensate for the adverse events generated by sickle haemoglobin (Hb S). Acute transfusion is generally performed to prevent / reverse severe anaemia or as an exchange transfusion for immediate reduction of sickle cell related acute complications [13]. Chronic transfusions are predominantly used for primary stroke prevention, or to prevent the recurrence of stroke among children with SCD, and to reduce recurrent vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) when HU is ineffective [14,15,16]. HU, a cytotoxic drug, is used in the hope of altering the marrow-proliferation in favour the production of Hb F over Hb S. Evidences suggest usage of HU reduces the incidence of acute pain, rate of acute chest syndrome, blood transfusion and overall mortality among patients with SCD [17, 18]. Furthermore, HU decreases the numbers of platelets and white cells reducing harmful effects interceded by them in vascular injuries [19].

Preliminary literature assessment suggested that the management of SCD in South Asian countries appears to vary and is not consistent with the generally practiced guidelines for SCD [20, 21]. We decided to conduct this review on the two main modalities of SCD treatment, namely blood transfusion and HU therapy across the different countries in South Asia to see how its applied in this region.

Methods

Search strategy

We searched databases of MEDLINE via Pubmed, Cochrane library (CENTRAL) and Scopus by Elsevier for studies published in English for past 15 years (between October 2005 and October 2020) using the following keywords in many combinations: Sickle cell, Sickle cell anaemia, Sickle cell disease, Blood transfusion, Hydroxycarbamide, Hydroxyurea, South Asia, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Maldives.

Inclusion criteria

Prospective trials, descriptive studies, randomized placebo-controlled trials, reviews and case series reporting the practice of blood transfusion and Hydroxyurea therapies for SCD in seven South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Maldives) were included in the present review.

Exclusion criteria

SCD related Studies that did not describe the practice of blood transfusion and Hydroxyurea therapies for SCD in aforementioned seven South Asian countries were excluded. Also, studies which were non-peer reviewed, unpublished and duplicate of a previously included study were excluded from the present review.

Data extraction

Two researchers (T.D. and A.P.) independently reviewed all abstracts of journal articles gathered by web search to identify papers that required full-text review. Final decision of selection was made via consensus. Furthermore, all articles were discussed with a third independent reviewer (D.R.). Data on the study setting, objectives, methods and results of each selected articles were extracted. Moreover, we methodically searched for any related papers in the reference lists of all articles selected.

Results

We identified 860 papers through the search strategy, of which only 41 articles were in compliance with inclusion criteria were selected for qualitative synthesis (Fig. 1). Out of the 41 articles 33 (80.5%) originated from India. In addition, there were 8 eligible papers including, 3 (7.3%) from Sri Lanka and 2 each (4.9%) from Pakistan, Bangladesh and one from Nepal (Fig. 2). Among the 8 studies selected outside India in South Asia, there were 7 case reports with 2 case studies each from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and one from Nepal [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. No eligible study was identified from Maldives and Bhutan. The majority of articles (58.5%; n = 24) were published during the last 5 years (2015–2020). Designs of the 34 studies excluding case reports included prospective cohort studies (n = 15), descriptive studies (n = 7), retrospective analyses (n = 5), reviews (n = 3), prospective cohort comparison (n = 2), analytical cross-sectional (n = 1) and randomized placebo-controlled trial (n = 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow of information through different phases of the systematic review

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Frequencies of data coming from each South Asian country

Full size image

Of the 34 studies excluding case reports (Table 1), 14 Indian studies (41.2%) focused on HU therapy while 6 studies (17.6%) focused on transfusion therapy. Seven studies (20.6%) were descriptive studies of clinical characteristics and 4 were observational cohort studies. Furthermore, 3 reviews described the clinical manifestation of SCD and the role of hydroxyurea in sickle patients with Asian haplotype. Of the 14 prospective Indian studies focused on HU therapy, 12 (85.7%) and 9 (64.3%) studies noted significant reductions in VOC and blood transfusion requirement respectively with HU therapy. Likewise, 5 (35.7%) studies reported significant reduction in hospitalization and 2 (14.3%) studies noted significant improvement in ACS following the HU therapy. Of the 14 prospective studies focused on HU therapy, 13 analysed the haematological profiles of the participants. Significant improvement, particularly in haemoglobin level and Hb F level was observed in the majority (n = 13; 100.0%, n = 10; 76.9% respectively). Of the 13 studies, 10 (76.9%) noted significant reduction in WBC with mild-moderate neutropenia prompted by HU therapy. Deshpande et al., analysed the variation of WBC over different age groups and found HU induced leukopenia was significant only amidst SCD children below 10 years of age [20]. However, none of the studies observed severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109/L) among the users of HU. Of the 13 studies that analysed haematological profile among HU users, 7 (53.8%) reported significant reduction in platelet count with no severe case of thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109/L). Variations were identified in the dose of HU given to patients with SCD. Eleven out of 14 prospective trials adopted fixed dose method and the remaining 3 trials adopted dose escalation regimen of HU. Of the studies adopted fixed dose method; 10 used low dose (10 mg/kg/day) HU regimen and one adopted standard moderate dose (20 mg/kg/day) regimen. Of the studies which adopted dose escalation method, 2 started with low dose and increase up to high dose and one started with the standard moderate dose (20 mg/kg/day) and escalated by 5 mg/kg/day as adjudged by the treating clinician.

Table 1 Summary description of the selected studies excluding case reports
Full size table

Indications for HU therapy have been elucidated in a previously published evidence-based review in which authors (Wong et al.) suggested 8 recommendations in a graded system for HU therapy among patients with SCD of all ages [61]. In the present study, we analysed the practice of recommendations made by Wong et al., among South Asian patients. Five studies practiced HU therapy in accordance with first recommendation (Grade 1A) which is the usage of HU when adult Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) patients’ experience ≥ 3 moderate to severe pain crises in a 12-month period [29,30,31, 52, 53]. Seven studies practiced HU therapy in accordance with 2nd, 3rd and 4th recommendations (Grade 1 B) suggesting the usage of HU when adult SCA patient has a history of ACS or symptomatic anaemia; children with SCA experience ≥ 3 moderate to severe pain crises in 12-month time period or having a history of ACS or symptomatic anaemia [29,30,31,32, 34, 35, 57]. In addition, five studies practiced HU therapy in accordance with recommendation 6 (usage of HU in SCA patients who have a history of stroke) [29, 30, 34, 35, 57], and two studies [29, 42] in accordance with recommendation 7 (usage of HU in adult Hb S-β+ thalassaemia patients who experience ≥ 3 pain crises in 12-month period or having a history of ACS). Incidentally, 2 further studies reported the usage of HU in Hb S-D Punjab patients when they experience 3 or more VOC within 12-month period time [38, 40].

Of the 41 selected articles, only 9 reported the indications for transfusion therapy in sickle patients. Severe anaemia (Hb level < 6–7 g/dl) was the commonest indicator (n = 8) for transfusion therapy followed by VOC (n = 2), stroke (n = 1), splenic sequestration (n = 1), pregnancy (n = 1) and headache (n = 1). Wide range of pre-transfusion Hb levels were recorded in 2 studies. A study done in Central India reported a pre-transfusion Hb range which varied from 1.6 to 8.2 g/dl whereas another study from Gujarat reported a pre-transfusion Hb range which varied from 2 to 10 g/dl [36, 59].

We attempted to assess issues relating to demand and availability of hydroxyurea and blood transfusion in the region. We were unable to find reliable information on hydroxyurea. Blood transfusion services are organised differently and the adequacy of blood donation and the percentage of voluntary donors are variable in the different countries in the South Asian region. The state has total control over the blood banks in Sri Lanka Maldives and Bhutan’s while in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal blood banking is heavily reliant on Non-Governmental organizations (NGO) and private blood banks though the state blood banks too exist. Overall, the demand for blood is not met in any of the countries except in Sri Lanka (Table 2). In 2017 India had the greatest absolute unmet blood unit requirement (40 964 075 units) from amongst 119 countries in the world [62].

Table 2 Estimated demand to supply ratio of blood in South Asian countries in 2017 according to the predictive model proposed by Nicholas Roberts and colleagues [62]
Full size table

Discussion

This systematic review of studies that evaluated the availability and therapeutic usage of both transfusion therapy and HU therapy for SCD in South Asia for the past 15 years identified that the available information in literature is limited and heterogeneous in nature. This precluded any effort of a proper meta-analysis. Even though presence of sickle haemoglobin had been reported from all South Asian countries, detailed studies of clinical outcomes were mostly available only from India. In most instances literature was restricted to case studies or case reports. One reason for this paucity of data could be the low prevalence of sickle haemoglobin in some countries in South Asia. For instance, studies from Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have shown that the prevalence of sickle haemoglobin was relatively lower than that of other haemoglobinopathies in these regions [63,64,65]. Sickle haemoglobin has been reported at comparatively higher prevalence from the Tharu community of Western Nepal and Pakistan [66, 67]. Although, the burden of the SCD in Tharu population had been acknowledged [68], no information was available of any evidence-based therapeutic strategy for patients with SCD from Nepal. The situation in Pakistan was not much different to that from Nepal. Other than the reports indicating the presence of SCD in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Karachi and Balochistan [69,70,71], nothing much is known about the clinical course of the disease and therapeutic scenarios currently in place for patients with SCD from these areas.

Even with limited data, the present review identified several indications for HU therapy for patients with SCD in India including, ≥ 3 pain crises/year, history of ACS, stroke and symptomatic severe anaemia. Nevertheless, in real world practice the circumstances could be quite different as explained by Jain et al.; in Maharashtra many patients with SCD have undergone HU therapy from the first clinical visit irrespective of their symptoms [47]. Moreover, the usage of HU for infants and children age 9 months or older who are asymptomatic or having infrequent pain episode has not adequately analysed among Indian patients. Therapeutic usage of HU for SCD have also been noted in couple of case reports from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and one descriptive cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka [21, 22, 26, 28]. However, particulars of different dosing regimens in practice, toxicities and detailed response to HU therapy is largely unknown. Despite all the known benefits of HU improving the quality of life, clinicians’ prescription and patient compliance of HU seems below par in the Indian subcontinent. In their recent review Jain and Mohanty described that the poor compliance with HU among Indian patients may be due to physician’s concerns of potential long-term mutagenic effects and lack of familiarity of primary attending medical staff with HU therapy [54]. Inconsistency in adherence with HU therapy owing to the lack of familiarity of primary care medical staff has also been noted in a recent Sri Lankan study in which authors recommended the development of national guidelines for management of patients with SCD [21]. Socio-economic status and the financial capabilities of the sickle patients largely influence the affordability of standard care including HU in economically disadvantaged settings in the Indian sub-continent. Nevertheless, country wise data and statistics about the availability and affordability of HU for sickle patients are not available in South Asia. Incidentally, initiations have been taken to deliver comprehensive care including free outpatient medication such as HU and pneumococcal vaccination for economically disadvantaged rural SCD communities in India with encouraging outcomes [41, 56]. However, no evidence is available about such initiatives outside India in South Asia.

Recent trials assessing the role of HU in preventing primary overt ischaemic stroke in patients with SCD of African origin found it to be effective [72, 73]. However, no such information is available about the efficiency of HU therapy in averting primary overt ischaemic stroke in patients with SCD of Indian origin.

Transfusion therapy for SCD has been used for many years and appears to be effective in primary and secondary prevention of stroke among sickle patients [74, 75]. The present review identified that transfusion therapy is in use for SCD in South Asia though there was paucity of information from outside India. However, indications of transfusion therapy have been described in limited number of studies. Available data suggests that transfusion was mostly given for severe anaemia (haemoglobin level below 6–7 g/dl). In addition, couple of Indian studies reported that transfusions were given when patients experience VOC [34, 38] and headaches [33]. Nevertheless, transfusion therapy for SCD seemed to be widely used in India without clear indications which could inevitably result in many deleterious clinical outcomes in patients and increase the financial burden. A study from Gujarat reported numerous transfusions for sickle patients with no clear diagnosis and justification [36]. Discrepancies and inconsistencies in transfusion practice for SCD has also been noted in Sri Lanka in which authors highlighted the disadvantage of not having a clear guideline [21]. Demand of blood for SCD transfusions is increasing in India by 0.99 million units per year. In line with projections by 2026 the total blood requirement for patients with SCD would reach 9.24 million units which would account for considerable portion of the total amount of donated blood [58]. There is however no data relating to blood requirements for patients with SCD outside India in the South Asian region.

Conclusions

In summary, both HU and transfusion therapy for South Asian patients with SCD would benefit more from further evidence-based assessments and interventions. Fixed-low dose HU therapy (10 mg/kg/day), which has yielded promising results among Indian patients with SCD may be applicable for sickle patients with Indian origin from other South Asian countries. Similarly, the role of transfusion therapy for SCD should be well defined in different sickle communities of Indian subcontinent. Initiation has been taken by India introducing “National Health Mission Guidelines on Haemoglobinopathies” which included basic guidance on HU and transfusion therapy for SCD [76]. There is a clear gap of knowledge about the nature of SCD in the Indian subcontinent particularly from countries outside India. Practice of the main therapeutic modalities such as transfusion and HU therapies, diagnosis and different patient management strategies of SCD have not been adequately described in these regions, suggesting the compelling need for more research and evidence-based policy making.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

SCD:

Sickle cell disease

Hb F:

Foetal haemoglobin

HU:

Hydroxyurea

TCD:

Trans Cranial Doppler

Hb S:

Sickle haemoglobin

VOC:

Vaso-occlusive crisis

ACS:

Acute chest syndrome

SCA:

Sickle cell anaemia

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

Hb SS:

Homozygous sickle

References

  1. Kato GJ, Piel FB, Reid CD, Gaston MH, Ohene-Frempong K, Krishnamurti L, et al. Sickle cell disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Makani J, Cox SE, Soka D, Komba AN, Oruo J, Mwamtemi H, et al. Mortality in sickle cell anemia in Africa: a prospective cohort study in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(2):e14699-e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Piel FB, Hay SI, Gupta S, Weatherall DJ, Williams TN. Global burden of sickle cell anaemia in children under five, 2010–2050: modelling based on demographics, excess mortality, and interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bello-Manga H, Galadanci AA, Abdullahi S, Ali S, Jibir B, Gambo S, et al. Low educational level of head of household, as a proxy for poverty, is associated with severe anaemia among children with sickle cell disease living in a low-resource setting: evidence from the SPRING trial. Br J Hematol. 2020;190(6):939–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandes TAADM, Medeiros TMD, Alves JJP, Bezerra CM, Fernandes JV, Serafim ÉSS, et al. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of sickle cell disease patients from a low-income region of northeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2015;37(3):172–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hockham C, Bhatt S, Colah R, Mukherjee MB, Penman BS, Gupta S, et al. The spatial epidemiology of sickle-cell anaemia in India. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Saxena D, Yasobant S, Golechha M. Situational analysis of sickle cell disease in Gujarat, India. Indian J Commun Med. 2017;42(4):218–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandow AM, Carroll CP, Creary S, Edwards-Elliott R, Glassberg J, Hurley RW, et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Adv. 2020;4(12):2656–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chou ST, Alsawas M, Fasano RM, Field JJ, Hendrickson JE, Howard J, et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: transfusion support. Blood Adv. 2020;4(2):327–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nigeria FRO. National guideline for the control and management of sickle cell disease. In: Nigeria FMoH, editor. Abuja: Federal Republic of Nigeria; 2014.

  11. Yawn BP, Buchanan GR, Afenyi-Annan AN, Ballas SK, Hassell KL, James AH, et al. Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. JAMA. 2014;312(10):1033–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. AlDallal SM. Voxelotor: a ray of hope for sickle disease. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis BA, Allard S, Qureshi A, Porter JB, Pancham S, Win N, et al. Guidelines on red cell transfusion in sickle cell disease. Part I: principles and laboratory aspects. Br J Hematol. 2017;176(2):179–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Inati A, Mansour AG, Sabbouh T, Amhez G, Hachem A, Abbas HA. Transfusion therapy in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017;39(2):126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang WC, Dwan K. Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:003146.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard J. Sickle cell disease: when and how to transfuse. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016(1):625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, Dover GJ, Barton FB, Eckert SV, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. J Med. 1995;332(20):1317–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg MH, Barton F, Castro O, Pegelow CH, Ballas SK, Kutlar A, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on mortality and morbidity in adult sickle cell anemia: risks and benefits up to 9 years of treatment. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1645–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Platt OS. Hydroxyurea for the treatment of sickle cell anemia. New Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1362–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deshpande SV, Bhatwadekar SS, Desai P, Bhavsar T, Patel A, Koranne A, et al. Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease: our experience in western India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfusion Off J Indian Soc Hematol Blood Transfusion. 2016;32(2):215–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Darshana T, Bandara D, Nawarathne U, de Silva U, Costa Y, Pushpakumara K, et al. Sickle cell disease in Sri Lanka: clinical and molecular basis and the unanswered questions about disease severity. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Afzal H, Umair SF. Haemoglobin sickle D disease: a presentation with ischaemic stroke. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:348–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Janjua T, Haider S, Raza N. Multiple complications in sickle cell anaemia. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68:154–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Premathilaka L, Lakmini M, Darshana T, Nawaratne S, Mettananda S, De Silva S, et al. Stroke in sickle beta thalassemia—a case report highlighting pitfalls in management in a low prevalence country. Sri Lanka J Med. 2018;26:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thalagahage KH, Jayaweera JAAS, Kumbukgolla W, Perera N, Thalagahage E, Kariyawasam J, et al. HbS/D-Punjab disease: report of 3 cases from Sri Lanka. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfusion Off J Indian Soc Hematol Blood Transfusion. 2018;34(2):350–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mollah M, Rahman E, Islam S, Morshed A, Munmun F, Shohel M. A young child with sickle cell beta thalassemia: a case report and review of literatures. J Dhaka Med College. 2013;21(2):245–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aziz M, Sarkar S, Rahman F, Biswas S, Baqi S, Begum M. Atypical presentation of sickle cell disease. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med Univ J. 2017;10:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lamsal KS. Sickle cell Anemia with avascular necrosis of femur being managed as rheumatic fever. J Inst Med Nepal. 2013;34:37–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Italia K, Jain D, Gattani S, Jijina F, Nadkarni A, Sawant P, et al. Hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease–a study of clinico-pharmacological efficacy in the Indian haplotype. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;42(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh H, Dulhani N, Kumar BN, Singh P, Tiwari P. Effective control of sickle cell disease with hydroxyurea therapy. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(1):32–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel DK, Mashon RS, Patel S, Das BS, Purohit P, Bishwal SC. Low dose hydroxyurea is effective in reducing the incidence of painful crisis and frequency of blood transfusion in sickle cell anemia patients from eastern India. Hemoglobin. 2012;36(5):409–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jain DL, Sarathi V, Desai S, Bhatnagar M, Lodha A. Low fixed-dose hydroxyurea in severely affected Indian children with sickle cell disease. Hemoglobin. 2012;36(4):323–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lakhkar BB, Lakhkar BN, Vaswani P. Transcranial Doppler study among children with sickle cell anaemia vs normal children. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2012;32:146–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jain D, Italia K, Sarathi V, Ghoshand K, Colah R. Sickle cell anemia from central India: a retrospective analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(11):911–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jain DL, Apte M, Colah R, Sarathi V, Desai S, Gokhale A, et al. Efficacy of fixed low dose hydroxyurea in Indian children with sickle cell anemia: a single centre experience. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50(10):929–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mehta V, Mistry A, Raicha B, Italia Y, Serjeant G. Transfusion in sickle cell disease: experience from a Gujarat centre. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(3):234–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jain DL, Krishnamurti L, Sarathi V, Desai S, Gokhale A. Long term safety and efficacy of low fixed dose hydroxyurea in pediatric patients with sickle cell anemia: a single center study from central India. Blood. 2013;122(21):1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Oberoi S, Das R, Trehan A, Ahluwalia J, Bansal D, Malhotra P, et al. HbSD-Punjab: clinical and hematological profile of a rare hemoglobinopathy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;36(3):e140–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Colah R, Mukherjee M, Ghosh K. Sickle cell disease in India. Curr Opin Hematol. 2014;21(3):215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Patel S, Purohit P, Mashon RS, Dehury S, Meher S, Sahoo S, et al. The effect of hydroxyurea on compound heterozygotes for sickle cell-hemoglobin D-Punjab—a single centre experience in eastern India. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(8):1341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nimgaonkar V, Krishnamurti L, Prabhakar H, Menon N. Comprehensive integrated care for patients with sickle cell disease in a remote aboriginal tribal population in southern India. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(4):702–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dehury S, Purohit P, Patel S, Meher S, Kullu BK, Sahoo LK, et al. Low and fixed dose of hydroxyurea is effective and safe in patients with HbSβ+ thalassemia with IVS1–5(G→C) mutation. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2015;62(6):1017–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Italia K, Kangne H, Shanmukaiah C, Nadkarni AH, Ghosh K, Colah RB. Variable phenotypes of sickle cell disease in India with the Arab-Indian haplotype. Br J Haematol. 2015;168(1):156–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Italia Y, Krishnamurti L, Mehta V, Raicha B, Italia K, Mehta P, et al. Feasibility of a newborn screening and follow-up programme for sickle cell disease among South Gujarat (India) tribal populations. J Med Screen. 2015;22(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Upadhye DS, Jain DL, Trivedi YL, Nadkarni AH, Ghosh K, Colah RB. Neonatal screening and the clinical outcome in children with sickle cell disease in central India. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Serjeant GR. Evolving locally appropriate models of care for indian sickle cell disease. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143(4):405–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jain D, Warthe V, Dayama P, Sarate D, Colah R, Mehta P, et al. Sickle cell disease in central India: a potentially severe syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83(10):1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jain D, Arjunan A, Sarathi V, Jain H, Bhandarwar A, Vuga M, et al. Clinical events in a large prospective cohort of children with sickle cell disease in Nagpur, India: evidence against a milder clinical phenotype in India. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(10):1814–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yadav R, Lazarus M, Ghanghoria P, Singh M, Gupta RB, Kumar S, et al. Sickle cell disease in Madhya Pradesh, Central India: a comparison of clinical profile of sickle cell homozygote vs sickle-beta thalassaemia individuals. Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2016;21(9):558–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Desai G, Anand A, Shah P, Shah S, Dave K, Bhatt H, et al. Sickle cell disease and pregnancy outcomes: a study of the community-based hospital in a tribal block of Gujarat, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2017;36(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Mohanty P, Jena RK, Sethy S. Variability of iron load in patients of sickle cell anaemia (HbSS): a study from Eastern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sahoo LK, Kullu BK, Patel S, Patel NK, Rout P, Purohit P, et al. Study of seminal fluid parameters and fertility of male sickle cell disease patients and potential impact of hydroxyurea treatment. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65(6):22–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sethy S, Panda T, Jena RK. Beneficial effect of low fixed dose of hydroxyurea in vaso-occlusive crisis and transfusion requirements in adult hbss patients: a prospective study in a tertiary care center. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfusion Off J Indian Soc Hematol Blood Transfusion. 2018;34(2):294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jain D, Mohanty D. Clinical manifestations of sickle cell disease in India: misconceptions and reality. Curr Opin Hematol. 2018;25(3):171–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jariwala K, Mishra K, Ghosh K. Comparative study of alloimmunization against red cell antigens in sickle cell disease & thalassaemia major patients on regular red cell transfusion. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Dave K, Chinnakali P, Thekkur P, Desai S, Vora C, Desai G. Attrition from care and clinical outcomes in a cohort of sickle cell disease patients in a tribal area of Western India. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4(4):125.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Somkuwar A, Bokade C, Merchant S, Meshram R, Mahalinge M, Somkuwar T. Short-term safety and beneficial effects of hydroxyurea therapy in children with sickle cell disease. Indian J Child Health. 2020;07:29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sinha S, Seth T, Colah RB, Bittles AH. Haemoglobinopathies in India: estimates of blood requirements and treatment costs for the decade 2017–2026. J Commun Genet. 2020;11(1):39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Jain D, Tokalwar R, Upadhye D, Colah R, Serjeant GR. Homozygous sickle cell disease in Central India & Jamaica: a comparison of newborn cohorts. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(4):326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Barma SK, Dash MR, Samal SR, Sethy G, Panigrahi P. Effect of hydroxyurea on clinical and haematological profile of children with sickle cell anaemia. Int J Res Rev. 2020;7(7):493–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wong TE, Brandow AM, Lim W, Lottenberg R. Update on the use of hydroxyurea therapy in sickle cell disease. Blood. 2014;124(26):3850–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Roberts N, James S, Delaney M, Fitzmaurice C. The global need and availability of blood products: a modelling study. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(12):e606–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Premawardhena A, Allen A, Piel F, Fisher C, Perera L, Rodrigo R, et al. The evolutionary and clinical implications of the uneven distribution of the frequency of the inherited haemoglobin variants over short geographical distances. Br J Hematol. 2017;176(3):475–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Uddin MM, Akteruzzaman S, Rahman T, Hasan AK, Shekhar HU. Pattern of β-thalassemia and other haemoglobinopathies: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. ISRN Hematol. 2012;2012:659191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Khan W, Banu B, Sadiya S, Sarwardi G. Spectrum of types of thalassemias and hemoglobinopathies: study in a tertiary level children hospital in Bangladesh. Thalassemia Rep. 2017;7:1.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gautam N, Gaire B, Manandhar T, Marasini BP, Parajuli N, Lekhak SP, et al. Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and hemoglobinopathy in South Western Region Nepal: a boon or burden. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Shrestha RM, Pandit R, Yadav UK, Das R, Yadav BK, Upreti HC. Distribution of hemoglobinopathy in Nepalese population. J Nepal Health Res Council. 2020;18(1):52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Marchand M, Gill C, Malhotra AK, Bell C, Busto E, McKeown MD, et al. The assessment and sustainable management of sickle cell disease in the indigenous Tharu population of Nepal. Hemoglobin. 2017;41(4–6):278–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hussain J, Arif S, Zamir S, Mahsud M, Jahan S. Pattern of thalassemias and other hemoglobinopathies: a study in district Dera Ismail Khan. Pak Gomal Med J Sci. 2013;11:174–7.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sameen D, Parveen S, Danish F, Salam H, Agha A, Sharafat S. Sickle cell anemia in sheedi population of lyari: hemoglobinopathy seen in a neglected population. Intjpathol. 2018;16(3):119–22.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hashmi NK, Moiz B, Nusrat M, Hashmi MR. Chromatographic analysis of Hb S for the diagnosis of various sickle cell disorders in Pakistan. Ann Hematol. 2008;87(8):639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ware RE, Davis BR, Schultz WH, Brown RC, Aygun B, Sarnaik S, et al. Hydroxycarbamide versus chronic transfusion for maintenance of transcranial doppler flow velocities in children with sickle cell anaemia-TCD with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387(10019):661–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Opoka RO, Hume HA, Latham TS, Lane A, Williams O, Tymon J, et al. Hydroxyurea to lower transcranial Doppler velocities and prevent primary stroke: the Uganda NOHARM sickle cell anemia cohort. Haematologica. 2020;105(6):e272–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Ware RE, Helms RW. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH). Blood. 2012;119(17):3925–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Alvarez O, Yovetich NA, Scott JP, Owen W, Miller ST, Schultz W, et al. Pain and other non-neurological adverse events in children with sickle cell anemia and previous stroke who received hydroxyurea and phlebotomy or chronic transfusions and chelation: results from the SWiTCH clinical trial. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(11):932–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Government of India MoHFW. Prevention and control of hemoglobinopathies in India -thalassemias, sickle cell disease and other variant hemoglobins. In: Mission NH, editor. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2016. p. 83–6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, 10250, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka

    Thamal Darshana

  2. King’s College Hospital, London, UK

    David Rees

  3. Department of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka

    Anuja Premawardhena

Authors
  1. Thamal Darshana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anuja Premawardhena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TD reviewed the literature, extracted and analysed the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. DR participated in conceptualization and revising the manuscript. AP participated in conceptualization revising the manuscript and overall supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thamal Darshana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darshana, T., Rees, D. & Premawardhena, A. Hydroxyurea and blood transfusion therapy for Sickle cell disease in South Asia: inconsistent treatment of a neglected disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16, 148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01781-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01781-w

Keywords

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172