Skip to main content

Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis causes significant disease burden but does not affect survival: FIN-GAR phase II study



Hereditary gelsolin (AGel) amyloidosis is an autosomal dominantly inherited systemic amyloidosis that manifests with the characteristic triad of progressive ophthalmological, neurological and dermatological signs and symptoms. The National Finnish Gelsolin Amyloidosis Registry (FIN-GAR) was founded in 2013 to collect clinical data on patients with AGel amyloidosis, including altogether approximately one third of the Finnish patients. We aim to deepen knowledge on the disease burden and life span of the patients using data from the updated FIN-GAR registry. We sent an updated questionnaire concerning the symptoms and signs, symptomatic treatments and subjective perception on disease progression to 240 members of the Finnish Amyloidosis Association (SAMY). We analyzed the lifespan of 478 patients using the relative survival (RS) framework.


The updated FIN-GAR registry includes 261 patients. Symptoms and signs corresponding to the classical triad of ophthalmological (dry eyes in 93%; corneal lattice amyloidosis in 89%), neurological (numbness, tingling and other paresthesias in 75%; facial paresis in 67%), and dermatological (drooping eyelids in 86%; cutis laxa in 84%) manifestations were highly prevalent. Cardiac arrhythmias were reported by 15% of the patients and 5% had a cardiac pacemaker installed. Proteinuria was reported by 13% and renal failure by 5% of the patients. A total of 65% of the patients had undergone a skin or soft tissue surgery, 26% carpal tunnel surgery and 24% at least unilateral cataract surgery. As regards life span, relative survival estimates exceeded 1 for males and females until the age group of 70–74 years, for which it was 0.96.


AGel amyloidosis causes a wide variety of ophthalmological, neurological, cutaneous, and oral symptoms that together with repeated surgeries cause a clinically significant disease burden. Severe renal and cardiac manifestations are rare as compared to other systemic amyloidoses, explaining in part the finding that AGel amyloidosis does not shorten the life span of the patients at least for the first 75 years.


Hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis (AGel amyloidosis; OMIM#105120), also called Meretoja syndrome according to the Finnish ophthalmologist Jouko Meretoja who first described it in 1969 [1], is an autosomal dominantly inherited systemic amyloidosis. The most common clinical signs in patients with AGel amyloidosis are progressive ophthalmological (corneal lattice amyloidosis), neurological (cranial and peripheral neuropathy), and dermatological (cutis laxa) signs, manifesting typically in their forties or fifties [2, 3]. Also other internal organ, especially renal [4,5,6], and cardiac [4, 5, 7,8,9,10], manifestations have been reported. The symptoms of AGel amyloidosis are suggested to be based on the deposition of gelsolin-based amyloid (AGel) fibrils and pre-amyloid oligomers, originating from misfolded gelsolin fragments and accumulating in multiple organs and tissues [2, 11]. So far it is not known why the manifestations of the disease vary remarkably between the patients [2].

Gelsolin is a calcium-activated, actin-modulating protein that has a role in multiple biological processes, and is present both in cytosolic and secretory forms in most cells [12,13,14]. AGel amyloidosis is caused either by the point mutation c.640G > A in the gelsolin gene on chromosome 9 at q33.2 [15, 16] or, less frequently, by the mutation c.640G > T at the same locus [2, 8, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Two novel gelsolin gene variants (c.633C > A, c.580G > A) causing renal amyloidosis have recently been reported in the US [24, 25]. The penetrance of the c.640G > A pathogenic variant is 100%. The prevalence of this mutation in Finland seems to be higher than anywhere else but individual patients and kindreds have also been reported in several other countries [2]. Estimates of the number of patients in Finland vary from 600 to 1000 [2, 3].

Meretoja himself began to chart the natural course of AGel amyloidosis [1]. Since his time, the prevalence and progression of its various signs and symptoms have been reported in several smaller cohorts and case reports. Our research group founded the National Finnish Gelsolin Amyloidosis Registry (FIN-GAR) in 2013 in order to increase the understanding on the natural course of this rare amyloidosis. Altogether 227 patients (211 living, 16 deceased) were entered in the registry in 2013–2014, estimated to cover approximately one third of the Finnish patients [3]. Our study showed that the patients become symptomatic at the mean age of 39 years and that ophthalmologic symptoms were the first to appear. The high prevalence of the characteristic triad of ocular, neurological and cutaneous symptoms was demonstrated [3]. However, open questions remained concerning the less well known of the anticipated symptoms, the symptomatic treatments, and disease progression.

Meretoja suggested in 1973 that the mortality of AGel amyloidosis patients might be somewhat increased [26]. In a previous study by our research group, however, based on death certificates of 231 patients who died in 1980–2014, the lifespan was shown to be comparable to that of the general Finnish population [27]. That study was based exclusively on data from deceased patients, which might have caused bias, and thus the result must be confirmed in a representative patient group including both the living and the deceased patients.

In our present study (FIN-GAR phase II), the data in the FIN-GAR patient registry were updated and 29 new patients were entered into the registry, increasing the total number of the patients to 261. More comprehensive overview of their various signs and symptoms, symptomatic treatments, and disease progression was obtained by introducing a more detailed survey. In addition, our study increases knowledge on the survival of AGel amyloidosis patients. We compared the lifespan of 478 living and deceased patients to that of the general Finnish population, utilizing relative survival analysis. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study on the natural history of AGel amyloidosis.


The FIN-GAR phase II questionnaire was returned by 129 patients, which corresponds to 54% of SAMY members. Of these 129 patients, 100 (47% of the surviving patients) had taken part in FIN-GAR phase I in 2013–2014, and 29 patients were new. As a result, FIN-GAR phase II registry includes 261 patients, of whom 183 (70%) are females and 78 (30%) males. Their mean age is 62.7 years (range, 26 to 85). Genetic testing to confirm the AGel c.640G > A variant had been done for 138 (53%) patients, one of whom is a homozygote. The mean follow-up time for the patients included in both phases was 4.9 years (range, 4.1–5.6). Baseline information regarding patients in the FIN-GAR phase II registry is presented in Table 1. The symptoms, their frequency and the median age at onset are presented in Table 2, and the percentage of patients receiving specific symptomatic treatments is presented in Table 3.

Table 1 Baseline information on the patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry
Table 2 The symptoms and signs of the patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry by order of frequency and the age at the onset of symptoms
Table 3 Patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry with specific symptomatic treatments

Ophthalmological manifestations

Corneal lattice amyloidosis (previously incorrectly called lattice corneal dystrophy, type II) is the first ophthalmological sign to appear (median age at diagnosis, 41 years) and 231 (89%) patients reported to suffer from it. Dry eyes is an even more common problem, affecting 242 (93%) patients (median age, 45 years). Photophobia and tearing were inquired separately only in the phase II questionnaire and the results are based on those 129 patients. Photophobia was reported by 101 (78%) patients (median age, 49 years) and tearing by 34 (26%) patients (median age, 56 years). Cataract was reported by 123 (47%) patients (median age, 62 years) and glaucoma by 60 (23%) patients (median age, 61 years). Of patients included in phase I and II, 95 (74%) told that their ophthalmological symptoms had progressed in the past 5 years.

Artificial tears were used by 121, approximately one half (46%) of the patients, and 197 (75%) visited their ophthalmologist regularly. At least unilateral cataract surgery was performed for 62 (24%) patients. The median age at the time of the first cataract surgery was 67 years. The cumulative frequency of selected surgeries is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The cumulative frequency of selected surgeries in 261 patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry. a: Skin or other soft tissue surgeries (n = 170, 65%). b: Cataract surgeries (n = 62, 24%). c: Carpal tunnel syndrome surgeries (n = 68, 26%)

Cutaneous and soft tissue manifestations

The most prevalent cutaneous symptom was drooping eyelids, caused by cutis laxa and aggravated by facial nerve paresis, reported by 225 (86%) patients (median age at onset, 50 years). Cutis laxa, abnormal general loosening of the skin, was reported by 219 (84%) patients (median age, 50 years), dry skin by 206 (79%) patients (median age, 40 years), and itchiness of the skin by 85 (33%) patients (median age, 49 years). Consequently, 110 (85%) patients used regularly moisturizing skin creams. The skin appears to be vulnerable to injury: 180 (69%) patients (median age, 39 years) suffered from tendency to bruising and 82 (64%) patients (median age, 34 years) reported getting wounds easily.

Manifestations of AGel amyloidosis may also include pathological changes in soft tissues other than the skin. Varicose veins were reported by 39 (30%) patients (median age at onset, 36 years), haemorrhoids by 38 (29%) patients (median age, 42 years), and hernias of different types by 30 (11%) patients (median age, 49 years), whereas 21 (8%) patients reported at least one prolapse of any type (median age, 41 years). Of patients who took part in both phases, 95 (72%) had the perception that their skin and other soft tissue-related symptoms had progressed during the follow-up.

Skin or other soft tissue surgeries had been performed in 261 (65%) patients. On average, patients had gone through 2.4 such surgeries (range, 1–16; Fig. 2) and the median age at the time of the first surgery in 129 patients was 53 years (interquartile range, 48–72 years).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Number of skin surgeries in 89 patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry, including eyelid and other facial surgeries, hernia and prolapse surgeries, and varicose vein surgeries

Neurological manifestations

The most prevalent neurological symptoms were numbness, tingling and other paresthesias, reported by 195 (75%) patients (median age at onset, 56 years). Facial paresis in 176 (67%) patients become symptomatic at the median age of 50 years. Other frequent manifestations were myokymias (54%; median age, 48 years), carpal tunnel syndrome (43%, 50 years), balance impairment (39%, 64 years) and dysarthria (31%, 61 years). Patients with dysarthria reported especially difficulty in articulating clearly outdoors in cold weather. Approximately half (53%) of the patients participating in both phases stated that their neurological symptoms had progressed during the follow-up. Of 111 (43%) patients with a carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed, 68 (61%) underwent surgery at a median age of 50 years (Fig. 1).

Cardiovascular manifestations

In the updated questionnaire, we asked spesifically about cardiac arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation, whereas in the previous questionnaire there was only a general question regarding arrhythmias. Of patients who returned the updated questionnaire, 20 (15%) reported cardiac arrhythmias and 6 (5%) atrial fibrillation, another 6 (5%) suffered from cardiac failure, and 12 (9%) had an ischaemic heart disease. Cardiomyopathy was reported by 13 (5%) patients. Pacemaker was installed for 12 patients (5%), and 8 (6%) patients reported a history of any kind of cardiac surgery of which 4 were bypass surgeries or angioplastias. The majority (61%) of the patients were not aware of any cardiovascular signs or symptoms, excluding hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. However, 12 (9%) patients reported that they had experienced progression in their cardiac symptoms during the follow-up.

Renal manifestations

Proteinuria had been detected in 35 (13%) patients (median age at onset, 54 years). Renal failure was reported by 14 (5%) patients and two patients (2%) used medications for renal disease. Moreover, 3 (1%) patients received or had previously received dialysis treatment, and kidney transplantation had been performed to 5 (2%) patients. Conversely, 111 (86%) patients who returned the updated questionnaire reported no kidney-related signs or symptoms, and only 6 (5%) had the perception that their renal symptoms had progressed during the follow-up.

Other manifestations

Regarding oral health, 111 patients (43%) reported dry mouth, 55 (43%) caries, and 25 (19%) gingivitis. One fifth of the patients (19%) reported no oral health issues, but approximately one third (35%) reported worsening oral health.

Patients also reported other symptoms possibly linked to AGel amyloidosis based on previous studies. Impaired hearing was reported by 112 (43%) patients and 23 (9%) patients had a hearing aid or cochlear implant. Oedema as an unspecific symptom, possibly in some patients related to renal problems, was reported by 72 (28%) patients. Sleep apnoea was reported by 15 (6%), hypothyroidism by 25 (10%), different kinds of pain by 99 (38%), cancer by 19 (15%), and depression by 17 (13%) patients.

Retirement and relative survival

Of the male and female patients, 42 (54%) and 99 (54%) had retired at mean age of 57.9 and 59.1 years, respectively.

We compared the lifespan of the patients with that of the general Finnish population using the relative survival framework (Table 4, Fig. 3). Relative survival was comparable to that of the general population at least until the age of 75 years: in the age group of 70–74 years old, i.e. after 30 to 40 years after the first symptoms, the relative survival was 0.96 for both male and female patients. After the age of 75, less than 100 patients remained in the analysis and the observed survival was thereafter lower than the expected survival for both genders.

Table 4 Relative survival for 188 male and 290 female patients with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry and a previous study on survival [27]
Fig. 3
figure 3

Relative survival of a) males and b) females with AGel amyloidosis in the FIN-GAR phase II registry and a previous study on survival. RS = relative survival [27]


Our registry study, FIN-GAR phase II, included 261 Finnish AGel amyloidosis patients of whom 29 were new. The registry is estimated to represent 25–40% of Finnish AGel patients, which we consider to be a reasonably large sample of all patients suffering from this rare disease. Our study describes the typical course of the disease and shows that symptoms and signs corresponding to the classical triad of ophthalmological (dry eyes in 93%; corneal lattice amyloidosis in 89%), neurologic (numbness, tingling and other paresthesias in 75%; facial paresis in 67%), and cutaneous (drooping eyelids in 86%; cutis laxa in 84%) manifestations are highly prevalent. Our study increases knowledge on the diversity of symptoms by showing that, in addition to previously known ones, a significant proportion of patients suffer from symptoms such as photophobia and a hearing deficit.

The prevalence of various ophthalmological manifestations was shown to be high in AGel amyloidosis patients but comparison data on prevalence of dry eyes, photophobia and tearing in the general population is not available. In a population based survey on the prevalence of major eye diseases in Finland [28], partly based on self-reported data similarly to this study, the prevalence of cataract and glaucoma for persons aged 30 years and older was reported to be 10 and 5%, and for persons aged 65 years and older 34 and 13%, respectively. In FIN-GAR registry patients with median age of 62.7 years the prevalence of cataract was 47% and that of glaucoma 23%. Cataract and glaucoma have been associated to AGel amyloidosis [4, 6, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35], but this high prevalence in patients was new information received through this study.

Understanding cardiac manifestations in AGel amyloidosis has been mainly based on smaller patient series and case reports that have reported conduction defects, such as atrioventricular blocks, sinus bradycardia, and sick sinus syndrome [4, 7,8,9,10]. In a series of 30 patients, signs of amyloid cardiopathy were rare both at clinical and in radiologic, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic examinations in middle-aged patients [36]. Valvulopathies have been observed in occasional patients [5, 7, 8]. Finally, only one patient with heart transplantation has been reported [37]. Our study confirms the previous assumption that severe clinical cardiac manifestations in AGel amyloidosis are rather rare, especially when compared with other systemic amyloidoses, such as AL and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. This is interesting, knowing that all investigated patients in our recent autopsy study of 25 patients had amyloid deposits in both myocardium and in cardiac blood vessels [38]. However, the study revealed that 5% of the patients have a pacemaker. It is more than in the general population: in year 2013 in Finland a total of 1020 new pacemakers per million inhabitants were installed [39], and the total prevalence of pacemakers in the population of the Helsinki University Hospital area is approximately 1% [40]. Relatively low frequency of severe cardiac manifestations likely contributes to the reasonably normal life span of AGel patients. However, notable individual variation in the phenotype means that, in rare cases, cardiac manifestations can be significant.

Similarly, the assumption has been that renal manifestation of AGel amyloidosis are rather rare and mild in heterozygous patients [4,5,6]. However, some patients have developed even a nephrotic syndrome [26, 35, 41], requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. On the other hand, homozygous patients have severe renal manifestations and they may suffer from nephrotic syndrome already in their early twenties, progressing to renal failure, dialysis treatment, and death [26, 42, 43]. The two recently reported gelsolin gene variants c.580G > A and c.633C > A seem to exclusively cause renal amyloidosis [24, 25]. Before the FIN-GAR registry, the true frequency of renal signs and symptoms was unknown. Our study confirms that severe renal manifestations are rare in AGel amyloidosis.

Hyposalivation and altered salivary composition have been suggested to increase the risk of caries and oral candidiasis in patients with AGel amyloidosis [44]. In our study, over 40% of the patients reported that they suffered from a dry mouth, and equally many from a tendency to caries, indicating that oral health care is an important part of symptomatic treatment of the patients.

The high frequency of skin and soft tissue surgeries is also an interesting observation. As many as 65% of the patients had been operated on at least once, and repeated skin or soft tissue surgeries had been completed for 45% of them. Tissue laxity was not limited to the skin, because patients reported also varicose veins, haemorrhoids, hernias, and prolapses, frequently requiring surgical treatment. However, the prevalence of varicose veins does not seem to be higher than in the general population [45]. An earlier study suggested that repeated plastic surgery is needed because its effects, although satisfactory, are only short-term [46]. Facial surgeries are likely due to the progressive changes in the structure of the skin. An increasing amount of amyloid in the skin is found with advancing age, and amyloid spreads even to the deeper dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue [47]. In addition, the characteristic facial nerve palsy that begins from the frontal branch of the nerve hastens the visible facial changes. In a series of 35 operated patients, none had normal function of the frontal branch of the facial nerve, and weakness in the buccal branch was seen in 40% [46].

The patients (42 males and 99 females) had retired between 1968 and 2019. Statistical data on the age of retirement in Finland is available only for years 1996–2018. During that period, the mean age of retirement varied from 56.6 to 60.9 years for males and from 57.8 to 60.7 years for females [48]. Males and females with AGel amyloidosis retired at the mean age of 57.9 years and 59.1 years, respectively. AGel amyloidosis does not seem to have a major influence on the age of retirement.

The lifespan of the patients was modeled using the relative survival framework, and the result of a previous study [27] was confirmed: the lifespan was not shorter than that of general Finnish population. The explanation why the observed survival of the patients was lower than the expected one in the oldest age groups is likely the small number of patients in these cohorts, causing bias. AGel amyloidosis seems to be an exception among other systemic amyloidosis in respect to the life span. Of other hereditary systemic amyloidoses, ATTR amyloidosis leads to death on average in 10 years after the disease onset [49], cystatine (ACys) amyloidosis before the age of 40 years [50], fibrinogen (AFib) amyloidosis within a median of 15.2 years after disease manifestation [51], and in lysozyme (ALys) amyloidosis the survival varies remarkably from 1 to 20 years after disease onset [52]. Especially the relative rarity of severe cardiac and renal manifestations likely contribute to this finding. The preliminary finding of our previous study [27] that the frequency of cancer as a cause of death in patients with AGel amyloidosis is lower than in the general population may also have an influence on their survival. It is interesting that although the disease burden is significant, the lifespan is comparable to that of the general population, at least until the age of 75 years, and the patients do not retire earlier than the general population.

Our study has several limitations. Of the surviving patients in the FIN-GAR phase I registry, 47% responded in the phase II questionnaire, and the results are partly based on the information reported already in our previous study [3]. The data were self-reported and collected through a patient survey, and complemented by telephone interviews in the phase I study, and not all the reported signs and symptoms were verified by a physician, which may artificially increase their prevalence. However, we consider it unlikely that patients would report certain signs like cataract or glaucoma without having a diagnoses made by an ophthalmologist. As the symptoms begin gradually, over many years, and many patients have a spectrum of different symptoms, memorizing the exact starting point of each symptom is subject to recall error. For this reason, the given years of onset must be taken as rough estimates in most cases. Secondly, patients were recruited through a disease-specific patient organisation. Patients registered as members might differ from those who declined such activities, as might patients who returned and did not return the phase II questionnaire either because they had less health problems or were more debilitated. Likewise, the gender distribution in our study was uneven, which may be due to the fact that female patients in general are more likely to answer questionnaires. On the other hand, our data represent an estimated 25–40% of all Finnish AGel amyloidosis patients, which provides reasonable assurance of representativeness.


We have presented here the most up to date and comprehensive cross-sectional study on AGel amyloidosis. The results reported in FIN-GAR phase I study were confirmed and data on several new symptoms and signs, use of symptomatic treatment, and performed surgeries add to the knowledge on the course and the burden of AGel amyloidosis. Our study emphasizes the clinical significance of the classical triad of ophthalmologic, neurologic and cutaneuous symptoms and signs, and confirms the earlier hypothesis that cardiac and renal manifestations are not very common in this amyloidosis. However, for yet unknown reasons and possibly related to the variability in the phenotype, patients rarely may develop severe cardiac or renal amyloidosis, leading to organ transplantation or even death.


Between September 2013 and June 2014 altogether 227 patients were entered into the FIN-GAR registry, and five more patients were added later in 2014–2017. In phase I, we interviewed most of the patients (87%) on telephone to complement the data given in the questionnaire. Full update (phase II) commenced in September 2018, 5 years after founding the registry.

An updated questionnaire, including a larger scale of known and anticipated symptoms and signs of AGel amyloidosis and their time of onset, was created. Because new patients were recruited, baseline information regarding primary symptoms, details of diagnosis and family history were inquired, similarly to the phase I questionnaire. In addition, the new questionnaire inqueried about possible symptomatic treatments that were either self-administered or provided by the health care system. Finally, the patients were asked about their subjective perception of the progression of their symptoms in different organs since the previous questionnaire, approximately 5 years earlier.

The Finnish Amyloidosis Association (SAMY; Suomen amyloidoosiyhdistys ry), sent the questionnaire to their 240 members. The pathognomonic clinical manifestations of AGel amyloidosis consist of the triad of corneal lattice amyloidosis, peripheral facial paresis and cutis laxa. This triad is not seen in any other known disorder [2], and for this reason, genetic testing is not required for diagnosis, especially if there are known cases of AGel amyloidosis in the family. Data received from patients who had participated in the FIN-GAR phase I were updated in the registry, and new patients, not previously entered in the registry, were included.

Because several new questions were added to the FIN-GAR phase II questionnaire, part of the endpoints could be analysed only for those 129 patients who returned that questionnaire. The analysed patient group is indicated in Table 2 by each symptom and sign. Regarding the endpoints for which data were available also from the FIN-GAR phase I study, the registry data were updated and the analyses were done for the complete registry of 261 patients. The patient inclusion process is presented in Fig. 4. The frequencies and the median age at the onset of the symptoms/signs were calculated. Distributions of continuous variables were analysed and tested for normality. The cumulative frequency of selected surgeries was plotted according to the age of the patient at the time of the surgery. These figures were constructed based on data from the patients who had the symptom of interest. IBM SPSS version 25 (SPSS, Inc., an IBM company, New York, NY) was used for the analyses.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Of the patients that were included in the FIN-GAR phase I registry, 100 responded in the phase II questionnaire and their data was updated. In addition, 29 new patients were included in the registry. In the FIN-GAR phase II registry the data of 132 patients was obtained from the FIN-GAR phase I registry

The lifespan of AGel amyloidosis patients was calculated based on survival data of 478 living and deceased patients. First, we extracted survival data from 272 death certificates that we collected for a previous study [27]. Then, survival data of 208 living patients was added from the FIN-GAR phase I patient registry; late patients of FIN-GAR phase I registry were already included in the data extracted from the death certificates. After data quality control we removed two subjects from the data set prior to the analysis. The lifespan was analysed using the relative survival framework, based on Ederer II estimator [53]. Relative survival is defined as the ratio of the all-cause survival of the patients to the all-cause survival that would be expected [54]. If relative survival is 1, the patient group survives equally in comparison to the background population, in this case general age, gender and calendar year matched Finnish population. If the disease of interest is rare, any difference in survival can be assumed to be due to that disease. Thus, the relative survival framework does not need information about the cause of death. Information concerning the general Finnish population was obtained from Statistics Finland. For the purpose of running the analysis, disease onset was set to the age of 30 years, and relative survival was estimated in five year time intervals using Stata (version 13, StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Cystatine amyloid


Fibrinogen amyloid


Gelsolin amyloid


Light-chain amyloidosis


Lysozyme amyloid


Transthyterin amyloid


The National Finnish Gelsolin Amyloidosis Registry


Relative survival


Finnish Amyloidosis Association (Suomen amyloidoosiyhdistys ry)


  1. Meretoja J. Familial systemic paramyloidosis with lattice dystrophy of the cornea, progressive cranial neuropathy, skin changes and various internal symptoms. A previously unrecognized heritable syndrome. Ann Clin Res. 1969;1(4):314–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiuru-Enari S, Haltia M. Hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis. In: Said G, Krarup C, editors. Peripheral nerve disorders, volume 115: handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. p. 659–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikoskinen T, Schmidt E-K, Strbian D, Kiuru-Enari S, Atula S. Natural course of Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis. Ann Med. 2015;47(6):506–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiuru S. Familial amyloidosis of the Finnish type (FAF). Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;86(4):346–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Steiner RD, Evans JP, Paunio T, Uemichi T, Benson MD. Asp187Asn mutation of gelsolin in an American kindred with familial amyloidosis, Finnish type (FAP IV). Hum Genet. 1995;95(3):327–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Purcell JJ, Rodrigues M, Chishti MI, Riner RN, Dooley JM. Lattice corneal dystrophy associated with familial systemic amyloidosis (Meretoja's syndrome). Ophthalmology. 1983;90(12):1512–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiuru S. Gelsolin-related familial amyloidosis, Finnish type (FAF), and its variants found worldwide. Amyloid. 1998;5(1):55–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chastan N, Baert-Desurmont S, Saugier-Veber P, Dérumeaux G, Cabot A, Frébourg T, et al. Cardiac conduction alterations in a French family with amyloidosis of the Finnish type with the p. Asp187Tyr mutation in the GSN gene. Muscle Nerve. 2006;33(1):113–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Meretoja J. Inherited systemic amyloidosis with lattice corneal dystrophy. Vammalan Kirjapaino, Vammala: Academic dissertation. University of Helsinki; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. de la Chapelle A, Kere J, Sack G, Tolvanen R, Maury C. Familial amyloidosis, Finnish type: G654→ a mutation of the gelsolin gene in Finnish families and an unrelated American family. Genomics. 1992;13(3):898–901.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kivelä T, Tarkkanen A, Frangione B, Ghiso J, Haltia M. Ocular amyloid deposition in familial amyloidosis, Finnish: an analysis of native and variant gelsolin in Meretoja's syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(10):3759–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwiatkowski DJ. Functions of gelsolin: motility, signaling, apoptosis, cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999;11(1):103–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bucki R, Levental I, Kulakowska A, Janmey PA. Plasma gelsolin: function, prognostic value, and potential therapeutic use. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2008;9(6):541–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Paunio T, Kangas H, Kiuru S, Palo J, Peltonen L, Syvänen A-C. Tissue distribution and levels of gelsolin mRNA in normal individuals and patients with gelsolin-related amyloidosis. FEBS Lett. 1997;406(1–2):49–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Haltia M, Levy E, Meretoja J, Fernandez-Madrid I, Koivunen O, Frangione B. Gelsolin gene mutation—at codon 187—in familial amyloidosis, Finnish: DNA-diagnostic assay. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(3):357–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwiatkowski D, Westbrook C, Bruns G, Morton C. Localization of gelsolin proximal to ABL on chromosome 9. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42(4):565–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Park K-J, Park J-H, Park J-H, Cho EB, Kim BJ, Kim J-W. The first Korean family with hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis caused by p. D214Y mutation in the GSN gene. Ann Lab Med. 2016;36(3):259–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klaus E, Freyberger E, Kavka G, Vodička F. Familiäres Vorkommen von bulbärparalytischer Form der amyotrophischen Lateralsklerose mit gittriger Hornhautdystrophie und Cutis hyperelastica bei drei Schwestern. Eur Neurol. 1959;138(1–2):79–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de la Chapelle A, Tolvanen R, Boysen G, Santavy J, Bleeker-Wagemakers L, Maury C, et al. Gelsolin–derived familial amyloidosis caused by asparagine or tyrosine substitution for aspartic acid at residue 187. Nat Genet. 1992;2(2):157–60.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Contégal F, Bidot S, Thauvin C, Lévèque L, Soichot P, Gras P, et al. Une amylose finlandaise chez une patiente française. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006;162(10):997–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boysen G, Galassi G, Kamieniecka Z, Schlaeger J, Trojaborg W. Familial amyloidosis with cranial neuropathy and corneal lattice dystrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979;42(11):1020–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Solari HP, Ventura MP, Antecka E, Belfort R Jr, Burnier MN Jr. Danish type gelsolin-related amyloidosis in a Brazilian family: case reports. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(4):286–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caress JB, Johnson JO, Abramzon YA, Hawkins GA, Gibbs JR, Sullivan EA, et al. Exome sequencing establishes a gelsolin mutation as the cause of inherited bulbar-onset neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(5):1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Efebera YA, Sturm A, Baack EC, Hofmeister CC, Satoskar A, Nadasdy T, et al. Novel gelsolin variant as the cause of nephrotic syndrome and renal amyloidosis in a large kindred. Amyloid. 2014;21(2):110–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sethi S, Theis JD, Quint P, Maierhofer W, Kurtin PJ, Dogan A, et al. Renal amyloidosis associated with a novel sequence variant of gelsolin. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(1):161–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meretoja J. Genetic aspects of familial amyloidosis with corneal lattice dystrophy and cranial neuropathy. Clin Genet. 1973;4(3):173–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt E-K, Atula S, Tanskanen M, Nikoskinen T, Notkola I-L, Kiuru-Enari S. Causes of death and life span in Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis. Ann Med. 2016;48(5):352–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Laitinen A, Laatikainen L, Härkänen T, Koskinen S, Reunanen A, Aromaa A. Prevalence of major eye diseases and causes of visual impairment in the adult Finnish population: a nationwide population-based survey. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(4):463–71.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Winkelman J, Delleman J, Ansink B. Ein hereditäres Syndrom, bestehend aus peripherer Polyneuopatie, Hauveränderungen und gittriger Dystrophie der Hornhaut. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1971;159(5):618–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Meretoja J. Comparative histopathological and clinical findings in eyes with lattice corneal dystrophy of two different types. Ophthalmologica. 1972;165(1):15–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Starck T, Kenyon KR, Hanninen LA, Beyer-Machule C, Fabian R, Gorn RA, et al. Clinical and histopathologic studies of two families with lattice corneal dystrophy and familial systemic amyloidosis (Meretoja syndrome). Ophthalmology. 1991;98(8):1197–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Akiya S, Nishio Y, Ibi K, Uozumi H, Takahashi H, Hamada T, et al. Lattice corneal dystrophy type II associated with familial amyloid polyneuropathy type IV. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(7):1106–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart HS, Parveen R, Ridgway AE, Bonshek R, Black GC. Late onset lattice corneal dystrophy with systemic familial amyloidosis, amyloidosis V, in an English family. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(4):390–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carrwik C, Stenevi U. Lattice corneal dystrophy, gelsolin type (Meretoja’s syndrome). Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(8):813–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Papathanassiou M, Liarakos VS, Vaikousis E, Paschalidis T, Agrogiannis G, Vergados I. Corneal melt in lattice corneal dystrophy type II after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(1):185–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiuru S, Matikainen E, Kupari M, Haltia M, Palo J. Autonomic nervous system and cardiac involvement in familial amyloidosis, Finnish type (FAF). J Neurol Sci. 1994;126(1):40–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fernández AL, Herreros JM, Monzonis AM, Panizo A. Heart transplantation for Finnish type familial systemic amyloidosis. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31(6):357–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidt E-K, Kiuru-Enari S, Atula S, Tanskanen M. Amyloid in parenchymal organs in gelsolin (AGel) amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2019;26(3):118–24.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Raatikainen MP, Arnar DO, Zeppenfeld K, Merino JL, Levya F, Hindriks G, et al. Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Ep Europace. 2015;17(suppl_1):i1–i75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaasalainen T, Holmström M, Kivistö S, Hänninen H, Pakarinen S. Tahdistinpotilaan turvallinen magneettikuvaus on mahdollista. Duodecim. 2018;134:599–602.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ardalan M, Shoja M, Paunio T. Hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis in Iran 2007: XIth international symposium on amyloidosis. USA: CRC Press; 2007.

  42. Maury C, Kere J, Tolvanen R, De la Chapelle A. Homozygosity for the Asn187 gelsolin mutation in Finnish-type familial amyloidosis is associated with severe renal disease. Genomics. 1992;13(3):902–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ardalan MR, Shoja MM, Kiuru-Enari S. Amyloidosis-related nephrotic syndrome due to a G654A gelsolin mutation: the first report from the Middle East. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(1):272–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Juusela P, Tanskanen M, Nieminen A, Kari K, Suominen L, Uitto V-J, et al. Xerostomia in hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2013;20(1):39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Laurikka J, Sisto T, Auvinen O, Tarkka M, Läärä E, Hakama M. Varicose veins in a Finnish population aged 40-60. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47(5):355–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pihlamaa T, Rautio J, Kiuru-Enari S, Suominen S. Gelsolin amyloidosis as a cause of early aging and progressive bilateral facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2342–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pihlamaa T, Suominen S, Kiuru-Enari S, Tanskanen M. Increasing amount of amyloid are associated with the severity of clinical features in hereditary gelsolin (AGel) amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2016;23(4):225–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Finnish Centre for Pensions. Effective retirement age in the earnings-related pension scheme [Internet]. 2019 [cited 04.10.2019]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  49. Planté-Bordeneuve V, Said G. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(12):1086–97.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Palsdottir A, Helgason A, Palsson S, Bjornsson HT, Bragason BT, Gretarsdottir S, et al. A drastic reduction in the life span of cystatin C L68Q carriers due to life-style changes during the last two centuries. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(6):e1000099.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Gillmore JD, Lachmann HJ, Rowczenio D, Gilbertson JA, Zeng C-H, Liu Z-H, et al. Diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of hereditary fibrinogen Aα-chain amyloidosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(2):444–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gillmore JD, Booth DR, Madhoo S, Pepys MB, Hawkins PN. Hereditary renal amyloidosis associated with variant lysozyme in a large English family. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14(11):2639–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ederer F, Heise HJB. MD: National Cancer Institute, End Results Section. Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations: Methodological note No. 10; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dickman PW, Coviello EJTSJ. Estimating and modeling relative survival. Stata J. 2015;15(1):186–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We warmly thank the patient organization SAMY for their kind assistance in posting the research material to the their members and the Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis patients for their active participation in the study.


The study was supported by Helsinki University Hospital. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




E-KS contributed to study conception, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and manuscript preparation. TN and SK-E contributed to study conception and interpretation of data. TTK contributed to conducting the relative survival analysis, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript. SA contributed to study conception, funding acquisation, interpretation of data and supervising the work. All the authors contributed to manuscript preparation and read the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eeva-Kaisa Schmidt.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The FIN-GAR phase II study was approved (HUS/1028/2018) by the ethical review committee of the Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

The participants gave a written consent before being included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, EK., Mustonen, T., Kiuru-Enari, S. et al. Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis causes significant disease burden but does not affect survival: FIN-GAR phase II study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 15, 19 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Gelsolin
  • Amyloidosis
  • AGel
  • Hereditary amyloidosis
  • Meretoja syndrome
  • Natural history
  • Lifespan
  • Relative survival