Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

The evolving therapeutic landscape of genetic skeletal disorders



Rare bone diseases account for 5% of all birth defects yet very few have personalised treatments. Developments in genetic diagnosis, molecular techniques and treatment technologies however, are leading to unparalleled therapeutic advance. This review explores the evolving therapeutic landscape of genetic skeletal disorders (GSDs); the key conditions and there key differentials.


A retrospective literature based review was conducted in December 2018 using a systematic search strategy for relevant articles and trials in Pubmed and respectively. Over 140 articles and 80 trials were generated for review.


Over 20 personalised therapies are discussed in addition to several novel disease modifying treatments in over 25 GSDs. Treatments discussed are at different stages from preclinical studies to clinical trials and approved drugs, including; Burosumab for X-linked hypophosphatemia, Palovarotene for Hereditary Multiple Exostoses, Carbamazepine for Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia (Schmid type), Lithium carbonate and anti-sclerostin therapy for Osteoporosis Pseudoglioma syndrome and novel therapies for Osteopetrosis. We also discuss therapeutic advances in Achondroplasia, Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI), Hypophosphotasia (HPP), Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva, and RNA silencing therapies in preclinical studies for OI and HPP.


It is an exciting time for GSD therapies despite the challenges of drug development in rare diseases. In discussing emerging therapies, we explore novel approaches to drug development from drug repurposing to in-utero stem cell transplants. We highlight the improved understanding of bone pathophysiology, genetic pathways and challenges of developing gene therapies for GSDs.


Rare bone diseases account for 5% of all birth defects and are an important cause of disability Worldwide, yet they remain a difficult group of conditions to treat [1]. In the 2015 Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders (GSDs) there were 436 GSDs with hundreds of causative genes [2]. Improved understanding of the fundamental pathophysiological pathways in GSDs has accelerated interest in related personalised therapies.

Previous reviews of therapeutic advances in skeletal disorders; such as Yap et al. in 2016, Jelin et al. and Nikkel in 2017, have focused on the well-known rare conditions; Achondroplasia (ACH), Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Hypophosphatasia, Fibrodysplasia Ossficans Progressiva (FOP) and Mucopolysaccharidoses, (MPS, types; I-II, IVa, VI) [3,4,5].

Since then, further therapies have developed for other skeletal disorders, such as; Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME), Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia Schmid type (MCDS), Osteopetrosis, X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), MPS IIIB (Sanfillippo B) and MPS VII (Sly), as well as expanding treatments in ACH and OI [6].

For clinicians, to keep abreast of such advances is difficult. This article reviews the evolving therapeutic landscape of GSDs, discussing those GSD’s with targeted therapies in development or use, explores the genomic basis of the conditions / therapy and where relevant, discusses clinical diagnoses, considering the main differentials. It is important to ‘know’ the conditions and their subtleties so that variants from future gene panels, exome /genomic sequencing can be evaluated accurately, as well as being able to recognise new phenotypes.


This article is a retrospective literature based review. Using Pubmed we searched for English language papers during December 2018 using the following search terms: ‘skeletal dysplasia / dysplasia’ or ‘genetic skeletal / bone’ or ‘inherited skeletal or bone’ AND ‘treatment’ or ‘therapeutic’ or ‘personalised therapy / treatment’ or ‘targeted therapy / treatment’. Over 140 abstracts were reviewed, and not restricted by publication type (e.g. case report). All abstracts greater than 15 years old were excluded as beyond this period very few relevant treatments existed. Remaining abstracts were screened for clinical relevance. The emphasis of this review was to consider personalised therapies and drugs that modify the underlying disease process, thus abstracts discussing orthopaedic / surgical interventions were excluded. Non-genetic conditions were also excluded.

A second strategy to uncover therapies that may have not yet been published or treatments that may have been missed from the Pubmed search, was to search the website using the same search strategy with an additional filter for ‘intervention’ type studies. Over 80 trials were identified in December 2018 and reviewed for clinical relevance.

Lastly any new therapies learnt about through conferences, study days, word of mouth etc. have also been included (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Flow diagram illustrating search strategy


FGFR3 spectrum disorders

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) mutations lead to group of autosomal dominant disorders that in descending severity include; Thanatotrophic dysplasia (TD), Achondroplasia (ACH) and Hypochondroplasia (HCH). FGFR3 negatively regulates endochondral ossification, thus activating FGFR3 mutations limit endochondral growth, leading to disproportionate short stature. Permanent activation of FGFR3 signalling activates two intracellular signalling cascades; STAT-1 (signal transducer and activator of transcription, leading to decrease chondrocyte conversion to bone) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase, leading to decreased production of extracellular matrix (ECM)) [7].

TD is one of the commonest lethal skeletal disorders. Patients present with severe micromelia, macrocephaly with frontal bossing and reduced thoracic volume [8].

ACH is the commonest post natal cause of disproportionate short stature. Unlike with TD, in ACH limb shortening is less severe and is rhizomelic, with redundant skin folds, reduced hip and elbow rotation, and metaphyseal flaring. Characteristic facial features include; macrocephaly, frontal bossing, a depressed nasal bridge, crowded teeth, mid-facial hypoplasia giving the impression of jaw protrusion, along with trident shaped hands, genua vara and brachydactyly [9]. ACH is associated with a number of orthopaedic, neurological, respiratory and ENT complications such as foramen magnum stenosis, craniocervical instability, sleep apnoea, restrictive and obstructive lung disease, scoliosis, spinal stenosis, recurrent ear infections, chronic pain and obesity. It has an incidence of 1 in 25,000 live births and is denovo in 80% of cases. Approximately 97% of ACH cases are caused by a G380R substitution of FGFR3, resulting in ligand dependent gain of function (through FGFR3 dimer stabilisation), though there are differing positions as to the biological mechanism which we discuss below [10].

The presentation of HCH is milder than ACH (with less pronounced limb disproportion and short stature and milder radiological findings). Life expectancy for individuals with HCH is normal, whereas historical literature suggests lifespan in ACH is reduced by 10 years on average due to the fore-mentioned complications (particularly in children under 4 years old due to brainstem compression leading to sudden death) [11, 12]. Recent literature suggests lifespan to be nearer to normal due to better surveillance and newer treatments [13]. Around 70% of HCH cases are caused by FGFR3 mutations (with the cause unknown in the remainder, though the question remains whether these cases really are HCH) and over 90% of these are due to the N540K mutation (C > A in ~ 70%, C > G in ~ 30%). Over 20 other mutations across FGFR3 are known including; N540 T, N540S and I538V [14]. Growth hormone (GH) is used in HCH (Table 1).

Table 1 FGFR3 gene related skeletal disorders and relative differences

Pharmacological agents for Achondroplasia: Vosoritide (CNP analogue) and TransCon CNP

Though there are currently no approved FDA treatments for ACH, Biomarin has developed Vosoritide (BMN111), a C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) analogue derived from natural human peptide. Naturally occurring CNP has a short half-life due to enzyme degradation whereas BMN-111 resists enzyme proteolytic activity. CNP is a known negative regulator of FGFR3. It binds natriuretic-peptide receptor 2 (NPR2) inducing cyclic gaunosine-3′.5′ monophosphate (cGMP) synthesis from Guanosine-5′-triphosphate (GTP), thus inhibits the MAPK pathway [15, 16].

Vosoritide acts to increase ECM production, which along with chondrocytes act as a template for enchondral ossification. The STAT1 pathway has not been affected though.

Phase 2 results for Vosoritide demonstrated favourable safety profiles and an increase in annual growth velocity of 50% (following daily subcutaneous injections at 15 μg/kg for 12 months) compared to pre-treatment growth velocity [17]. Further results from the phase 2 study published in July 2019 showed a generally mild side effect profile in the 35 study participants, 30 completed the study; 2 patients withdrew due to fear of needles. Sustained annualised growth velocity was demonstrated for up to 42 months at the 15 μg/kg and 30 μg/kg doses [18]. Phase 3 clinical trials are currently under way in children aged 5–18 years at the 15 μg/kg dose with UK recruitment centres in Sheffield and London ((NCT03197766). A phase 2, trial is ongoing (NCT03583697) of Vosoritide in infants and younger children (age range, 0 to < 60 months).

Though Vosoritide is a major breakthrough as compared to the standard of care, there is concern with respect to long term results. Some patients with ACH have elevated levels of CNP suggesting natural resistance may be an issue. Additionally subcutaneous daily injections are not ideal [19]. The short life of Vosoritide leads to high peak-to-trough ratios with hypotension seen in some patients coinciding with maximal blood concentrations indicating a causal relationship [20].

The body proportions (upper body length to leg length ratio) showed no improvement with Vosoritide treatment in the phase 2 trial, perhaps because the STAT1 pathway is not manipulated.

Ascendis Pharma have developed a slow release CNP analogue (TransCon CNP) where the CNP is bound to and shielded by a TransCon Carrier. Carrier autohydrolysis allows for sustainable release over 7 days. A phase 1 trial in healthy adults has been completed and a phase 2 trial is planned in 2019 Q3.

Pharmacological agents for Achondroplasia: TA-46

One drug in particular that aims to improve anatomical proportions is TA-46. TA-46 is a recombinant FGFR3 ligand trap (a soluble form of human FGFR3), initially developed by Therachon AG [21].

Early literature has long held that ACH is caused by ligand-independent FGFR3 activation, so why would a ligand trap be useful? [22] More recent work has suggested that dimerization and over activation of FGFR3 are ligand-dependant and the discrepancy between the earlier and later work may be due to differing cellular systems, though there is no clear consensus in the literature suggesting multiple mechanisms leading to prolonged intracellular signalling [23].

TA-46 binds to FGFR3’s natural ligands, preventing the ligands from binding to the FGFR3 receptor / over-activating the STAT1 and MAPK pathways. Thus TA-46 is effectively a decoy receptor or a ‘ligand trap’. TA-46 thus normalises overactive FGFR3 signalling at a more root level. TA-46 has received orphan drug designation by the EMA (European Medical Agency) and FDA (US Food and Drug Administration agency) in 2018 and phase 1 studies have been completed with phase 2 studies planned for late 2019 [24]. Studies of sFGFR3 (soluble FGFR3 protein) in ACH mouse models have demonstrated symptom rescue with treated mice showing similar body proportions to healthy wild type (w/t) counterparts, which is a marked improved on the naso-anal length increase shown by CNP [25]. Again by tackling the problem at a root level there is much excitement over TA-46, though off-target effects remain to be seen.

It is hoped that TA-46 will act not just to increase vertical growth but bone thickness too. This could potentially mean increased vertebral foramen width thus decreasing significant morbidity caused by spinal stenosis. Pfizer recently acquired Therachon, thus TA-46 will be known as Recifercept [26].

Pharmacological agents for Achondroplasia: Meclozine

Professor Matsushita of Nagoya University demonstrated through drug repurposing, symptom rescue in ACH transgenic mice treated for 3 weeks with Meclozine (a common anti-emetic) back in 2015 [27]. Meclozine showed improvement in total length and in body proportions. The authors predicted that in humans with ACH this treatment could equate to 6-7 cm height gain. Though Meclozine is a commonly prescribed drug, safety and pharmocokinetic data is limited to adults hence the need for clinical studies in children. Such a trial, in children aged 5–11 years (single arm, open, non-blinded, non-randomised) is in the recruitment phase (trial ID; UMIN000033052) [28]. The mechanism for how Meclozine drives growth in ACH is unclear though it is thought to be due to inactivation of FGFR3 signalling through inhibition of ERK (extra-cellular signal regulated kinase) to MAPK.

Pharmacological agents for Achondroplasia: Infigratinib

QED Tx pharmaceuticals have developed Infigratinib, a pan-FGFR (1–3) TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), more selective of FGF3 than other FGFRs, which has already shown meaningful clinical activity in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Infigratinib blocks tyrosine kinase activity of mainly the MAPK receptor (but also the STAT and SOX9 pathways) intracellularly and hence downstream signalling. It therefore counteracts FGFR3 hyperactivity. Phase 1 trials in ACH mouse models have shown improvements in both axial and appendicular skeletons, as well as correction in foramen magnum anomalies and vertebral disc defects, acting through not only the MAPK pathway but STAT and SOX9 (SRY-Box 9) too. Bone growth was reported as 2–3 times greater than as compared to BMN-111 and no other gross side effects were observed, probably since Infagratinib is selective of FGFR3 TKIs as compared to FGFR1/2 [29] (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of treatment advances for Achondroplasia

It is an exciting time for Achondroplasia treatment, from no drugs to several candidates and the potential for combination therapy in the future.

High bone mass conditions (Sclerosing bone disorders)

Healthy skeletal remodelling involves the intricate interplay between osteoblast-led bone formation and osteoclast-led bone resorption. Osteoblast and osteoclast activity is influenced and regulated by osteocytes [30].


Osteopetrosis (“marble bone” or “stone bone” disease) is the term used to describe a collection of rare, heritable skeletal disorders characterised by increased bone density on radiographs. They are most commonly inherited in an AD (autosomal dominant) fashion but can be autosomal recessive (AR) or X-linked (XL) [31]. The AD, AR and XL forms of osteopetrosis are predominantly caused by mutations in the CLCN7, TCIRG1 and IKBKG genes respectively. There are several other genes including those that enable osteoclasts to acidify skeletal matrix.

Osteopetrotic conditions are broadly classified into 3 distinct forms based on age of onset and clinical features; infantile, intermediate and adult onset. Within each type, several different variants and molecular causes have been identified. Other rare forms exist that fall outside these categories (e.g. lethal, transient, acquired osteopetroses) and distinct forms associated with other disease such as renal tubular acidosis are also described.

The infantile form tends to be recessive (ARO – autosomal recessive osteopetrosis) and the most severe form, frequently fatal in the first decade. The adult form is often dominantly inherited (ADO- autosomal dominant osteopetrosis), though is relatively benign with a good prognosis. The intermediate form is often recessive with a poor prognosis and present in childhood (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Rugger Jersey Spine in Osteopetrosis. Images taken from under creative commons license 3.0 [32]

Osteopetrosis is characterised by increased bone mass (dense) of poor quality in all compartments.

The underlying defect may lie in the osteoclast lineage itself (where osteoclasts can be low in number thus termed ‘osteoclast-poor’) or in the mesenchyme cells that form and maintain the microenvironment required for proper osteoclast function (where osteoclast number can be high, i.e. ‘osteoclast-rich’ osteopetrosis, where the osteoclasts are unable to secrete acid) [33].

Osteoclasts break down bone tissue during bone remodelling, a normal dynamic process whereby old bone is replaced with new bone to maintain bone health and mineralisation. In osteoclastic failure, old bone is not broken down as new bone is formed, thus bones become structurally abnormal, unusually dense and prone to fractures. Bone modelling (shaping) is particularly important during childhood (during the period of linear growth). Decreased tubulation of long bones by osteoclasts leads to widened metaphyses (club shaped bones) or an “erlenmeyer flask” deformity (a funnel like extremity with reduced medullary cavities).

ADO can radiographically result in the classic rugger jersey spine appearance (where vertebral endplates are densely sclerotic giving a ‘sandwich appearance’ (Fig. 2) or a bone within bone appearance [32].

In ARO the skull foramina fail to enlarge often leading to cranial nerve impingement. The sclerotic bone compromises marrow space leading to bone marrow failure; anaemia, and recurrent infections. Some patients have seizures due to hypocalcaemia due to diminished bone resorption. Skeletal features include osteoarthritis, fractures and osteomyelitis.

In XL osteopetrosis bony features can be associated with severe immunodeficiency and ectodermal dysplasia like features [34].

Though bone is more dense, it is still prone to fractures due to alteration of the bony architecture (decreased hydroxyapatite), and persistence of unresorbed primary spongiosa formed during enchondral bone formation (which appear as ‘bars’ of calcified cartilage within trabecular bone and are pathognomonic) [34].

Treatments considered for osteopetrosis

Bone marrow transplant (BMT) is frequently an effective form of treatment for the recessive infantile form of osteopetrosis. BMT modifies the conditions natural course, as osteoclasts originate from the bone marrow (from monocytes). Bone marrow treatment, though curative in most cases is limited in availability with acceptable donors found in only 40% of cases, additionally BMT is associated with acute rejection, graft versus host disease and veno-occlusive events [35].

Long term interferon gamma-1b therapy (INFG, a cytotoxic and immunomodulatory agent) has also been shown to be effective and shows good haematological recovery though is not a cure hence is seen as a bridge to definitive BMT therapy. Key et al., described “treatment with INFG1b for 18 months stabilised / improved the conditions of all 11 patients treated for the full treatment period, and none of the 14 patients treated for at least 6 months died.” They showed additional benefit to white blood cell function, decreasing new infections. It is not exactly clear how INFG1b causes this improvement but it is hypothesised that INFG1b produces an osteoclastic superoxide which helps osteoclasts in degrading the bone matrix.

Other treatments for infantile osteopetrosis and less severe forms of osteopetrosis in which BMT is not indicated include;

  • calcitriol which appears to stimulate dormant osteoclasts precursors into osteoclasts at low doses and at high doses stimulates RANKL production (despite initial promise, calcitriol use has fallen out of favour due to lack of clinical benefit in longer term use) [36].

  • calcium and vitamin D (ergocalciferol / cholecalciferol) supplementation [35].

  • erythropoietin, red cell transfusions and steroids to correct anaemia. The response to steroids is variable at best and has not demonstrated alteration in the natural course of the disease [38].

The evidence for these treatments is of either low or very low quality as assessed using the Delphi method by the Osteopetrosis Working Group in 2017 [37].

Personalised treatment in ADO

ADO has two major forms; ADO Type 1 (ADO1) and ADO Type 2 (ADO2). ADO1 is typified by sclerosis (thickening) of the dome of the skull and is caused by gain of function LRP5 gene changes. ADO2 is commoner than ADO1 and demonstrates the aforementioned ‘rugger jersey’ spine appearance and endobones (bone in bone appearance) in the pelvis. The majority (70%) of ADO2 cases are due to CLCN7 gene dominant negative mutation. The CLCN7 gene (chloride channel 7) codes for the hydrogen / chloride exchange transporter which is necessary for osteoclast acidification.

HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant), a high risk procedure, is usually reserved for severe forms of ARO rather than milder ADO forms. Nevertheless patients still suffer lifelong severe symptoms thus a more personalised therapy is required.

It was proposed that short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) technology could work to knock out the affected allele. SiRNAs are produced within cells but can be introduced artificially. SiRNAs work by binding various proteins in the cell to target specific mRNAs (messenger RNA), which they degrade. In this case the siRNA targets the mRNA produced by the affected ADO2 allele and does not interfere with the normal wild type mRNA. Since ADO2 causes dominant negative mutations, neutralising the mutated mRNA induces a pseudo haplo-insufficient state, rescuing the phenotype [38]. Early studies on human mutant osteoclast cell lines have shown promising results by Capulli et al. [39]. Osteoblasts also express the CLCN7 gene but at much lower levels than in osteoclasts and hence bone formation is not affected when the CLCN7 gene is altered. Capulli’s group did not observe off-target effects of CLCN7G213R, CLCN3 and CLCN5 transcripts, suggesting high treatment specificity.

Further translational with respect to siRNAs in the GSD field has been slow. The author proposes that this is probably due to the challenge of delivering the siRNA to osteoclasts in the body (a systemic treatment), which would most likely require an osteoclast seeking factor and packaging of the siRNA with an extracellular vesicle (e.g. a liposome). SiRNA have been hugely successful where disease is localised such as in retinal ocular disease. Another challenge is many siRNA therapies, though injectable, require frequent dosing. One way around this could be to direct therapy to the phases of greatest growth (childhood) when bone modelling and remodelling are very active and osteoclast bone resorption is crucial for bone shaping, growth and development. Another way to overcome frequent dosing is to develop lentiviral vectors which lead to stable expression like with nusinersen (Spinraza), a recent genetic viral therapy for spinal muscular atrophy which we examine further in the discussion.

Interestingly CLC7 pump protein inhibitors can help increase bone mass and may show promise in bone loss conditions.

Insights from ARO

A rare recessive form of osteopetrosis that provides important therapeutic insights is RANKL (Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) ligand, dependant osteopetrosis (RANKL-dependant ARO) caused by genetic defects to the function of the RANKL cytokine.

RANKL is a type II transmembrane protein otherwise known as osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF). Along with M-CSF (macrophage colony-stimulating factor), it is the master cytokine driving osteoclast differentiation and osteoclastogenesis. Defects in the RANKL gene prevent osteoclast formation and decreased bone resorption, leading to highly dense bone. Over activation of this pathway leads to osteoporosis, Paget’s disease and cancer related osteolysis [39, 40].

RANKL-ARO accounts for around 3% of all forms of ARO [41]. Sadly, these patients, commonly experience neurological deterioration with age (due to bony compression causing hearing / visual impairment), severe growth retardation (height well below the 0.4th centile), as well as worsening dentition. They also experience multiple poorly healing fractures, anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and recurrent infections. Several patients suffer upper airway obstruction leading to the need for positive airway support or even a tracheostomy. The severity of the condition demonstrates the need for targeted RANKL treatments. RANKL is highly expressed in mesenchyme cells not haemopoietic osteoclast lineages so is not amenable to HSCT.

Iacona and colleagues (2012) administered RANKL protein into mice with homozygous defects in RANKL, showing bone rescue (increased bone resorption) over a 1-month treatment period (with additional improvement in haemopoietic bone marrow function and improvement in splenic and thymic architecture) [41]. Unfortunately the promise of these early mice studies has not translated into further human based therapy as yet, as the higher doses in animal models led to cytokine overproduction and lethality secondary to respiratory failure [41].

Although personalised therapies have shown initial laboratory based promise in osteopetrosis more research is needed before translation to humans.

Low bone mass conditions

Osteoporosis-Pseudoglioma syndrome

Osteoporosis-Pseudoglioma Syndrome (OOPG) is a very rare AR condition, with around 50 cases reported, caused by loss of function mutations in the LRP5 gene [38]. OPPG involves severe osteoporosis and impaired vision. Visual loss is usually present at birth or early infancy and most patients are blind by young adulthood. The eye changes resemble a retinal glioma. The osteoporotic changes are usually noted in childhood leading to brittle bones and fractures, short stature, kyphoscoliosis, craniotabes and limb deformities [42]. Rare associated symptoms include mild intellectual disability, hypotonia, abnormally flexed joints or seizures.

Standard treatment in OPPG revolves around bisphosphonates which help bone strength somewhat but have not prevented bone fractures in the OPPG group [38].

Osteoclast mediated bone resorption occurs through resorption of hydroxapetite (a crystalline complex of calcium and phosphate) - the major component of calcified bone, which gives its rigidity and hardness [43]. Bisphosphonates are readily taken up the skeleton and contain pyrophosphate which selectively binds to calcium crystals (e.g. hydroxyapatite) preventing there growth and osteoclasts mediated dissolution, hence bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density (BMD). Though BMD is increased in OPPG this has not been shown to decrease fractures in OPPG.

Lithium is a well-known drug, used safely and effectively for over 50 years in psychiatric disease (specifically bipolar illness) and is known to strengthen bone and reduce fractures in the psychiatric cohort. An OPPG mouse model trialling Lithium showed dramatic improvement in bone strength and fracture prevention [44]. Streeten et al. devised a pilot study to explore the effects of 6 months lithium carbonate treatment on 10 OPPG patients. Only 2 patients continued the trial (of 5 in the intervention arm) and despite improvement in bone measurements these were statistically insignificant [45].

Though the trial failed, mouse studies showed much promise and postulated that Lithium worked via activation of the canonical WNT (wingless-related integration site) signalling pathway, downstream of the LRP5 (low density lipoprotein 5) receptor.

LRP5 and LRP6, along with Frizzled, are co-receptors of WNT, that combine to form the LRP5/LRP6-WNT-Frizzled complex. The activated complex leads to nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, increasing target gene expression, leading to increased bone growth. Lithium is known to inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK), an enzyme that phosphorylates cytoplasmic β-catenin, targeting it for ubiquitination and degradation. Hence Lithium leads to bone growth [38].

Another mechanism that has been explored is SOST (sclerostin) inhibition. SOST antagonises WNT signalling by binding to the extracellular domain of LRP5 and LRP6.

Anti-sclerostin therapy effectively removes the brakes on signalling through LRP5 and LRP6. Kedlaya et al. showed that inhibiting sclerostin with sclerostin antibodies in OPPG mice (Lrp5(−/−) led to osteoanabolic responses as shown by increased bone mineral density, content and formation rates. It is suggested that humans may benefit from similar treatment [46].

Osteogenesis Imperfecta

We briefly discuss the evolving OI treatment landscape, which is more expertly considered in the cited literature. OI is a rare heterogeneous genetic dysplasia that can be inherited in different ways (though AD is the commonest form, followed by AR, then XL). The hallmark of OI is weak bones that break despite little or no trauma, with dentinogenesis imperfecta, blue sclera and adult-onset hearing loss. Weak bones lead to bowing of the arms or legs, bone pain, fatigue, curvature of the spine, lax joints, muscular weakness, long term immobility and short stature. Clinical severity varies with the most severely affected individuals dying prenatally to those who have normal lifespans’, stature, dentition and only mild predisposition to fractures. Between 85 and 90% of OI cases are caused by mutations in the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes which code for type 1 collagen (the most abundant collage in the bone, skin and other connective tissues) [47]. Other genes are implicated in rare types of OI, often encoding proteins involved in post-translational modification of collagen and genetic defects in osteoblast development for example; CRTAP (type VII OI) and P3H1 (type VIII OI). OI type XIII (AR, BMP1 gene) is unusual as it leads to high bone mass, though impaired bone microstructure and compromised bone strength [48].

There are currently 19 different types of OI as per OMIM classification, whereas the 2015 Nosology of GSDs prefers the Sillence classifications’ four main subtypes determined by severity, phenotypic and radiographic data (rather than molecular data), as the Sillence classification is still heavily used for prognostication [49, 50]. OI types I, III and IV account for 72–77% of the total OI population [51].


Current standard of care in several types of OI is supportive, focusing on treating fractures and maximizing mobility including bisphosphonates, physiotherapy, mobility aids and surgery. Alongside bisphosphonates, several others drugs are in trials; Denosumab (a RANKL inhibitor), Fresolimumab (anti TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta) antibody therapy), Teriparatide (a form of PTH, parathyroid hormone) and anti-sclerostin therapy.

Bisphosphonates do not build new bone or improve the quality of existing bone in OI. Rather they increase bone mineral density (BMD) and preserve existing bone / prevent bone mass loss, as they bind hydroxyapatite which is usually taken up by osteoclasts (where they exert their anti-resorptive effects). Despite improvement in BMD and QOL, the data whether bisphosphonates (either oral or IV) prevent fractures in adults with OI is conflicting and inconclusive, though in children prolonged intravenous Pamidronate treatment has been shown to initially decrease fractures [52]. A recent Cochrane review found there was no conclusive evidence of improved clinical status in those with OI treated with bisphosphonates [55]. There are also concerns about long term use and complication such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fractures.

Teriparatide (TPTD, a human PTH analogue) on the other hand builds bone (by activating osteoblasts) and is used in some cases of OI (with particular benefit in quantitative collagen deficiencies, thus Sillence type 1 OI [53]. The TOPAZ trial led by Professor Ralston from Edinburgh, UK is currently recruiting patients to see if TPTD and Zolendronate combined reduce the risk of fractures in adults with OI [54]. There is no particular role for GH in OI, as the short stature is not due to GH deficiency, though GH is helpful in type I and IV OI [55].

Osteoporosis (which by definition is a bone mineral density score as compared to a young healthy control of 30 year age of < or = to 2.5 SD from the mean) complicates many cases of OI. Such patients, after evaluation using the FRAX® clinical risk calculator for fracture assessment may require bisphosphonate treatment, though some are unable to tolerate it due to side effects of reflux oesophagitis.

OI and RANKL inhibitors (Denosumab)

For children affected by OI with osteoporosis, Denosumab (an anti-resorption RANKL agent) has been shown to raise bone mineral density (BMD) without adverse effects and decreased fracture rates in a Japanese study, though there were only 8 participants and only 3 of these under 16 years [56]. This study was limited by lack of a control group, short observation period for some patients (though 5 patients had Denosumab for > 30 months) and its retrospective design.

Denosumab is marketed as Prolia® or XGEVA® in the USA and is licensed for post-menopausal women who are at high risk of fracture due to osteoporosis. Denosumab works by inhibiting RANKL. RANKL, is a precursor that is involved in maturation of the osteoclast. By blocking RANKL, Denosumab blocks osteoclast maturation. In contrast, bisphosphonates work by binding bone mineral (in locations where minerals are absorbed by mature osteoclasts), induce osteoclast apoptosis and suppress resorption.

OI and anti-Sclerostin therapy (BPS804, Setrusumab)

We discussed the role of sclerostin and the mechanism for anti-sclerostin inhibitors when discussing the treatment of OPPG, a low bone mass condition.

Anti-sclerostin therapies are in development for OI too. Setrusumab (BPS804) developed by UK pharmaceutical Mereobiopharma, is an anti-sclerostin antibody recently evaluated as part of a phase 2A trial for moderate OI [57]. The phase 1A study, undertaken in the USA, Canada and Europe, involved 14 adult patients with OI (9 in the intervention group and 5 in the control). The intervention group received multiple escalating doses of BPS804 and were assessed at 6 weeks for bone biomarkers and at 20 weeks for BMD. BMD increased by 4% (P = 0.038) in the intervention group and was generally well tolerated. Results have been promising showing statistically significant improvement in BMD and bone biomarkers. A phase 2B randomised, double blinded control trial is currently in progress (the ASTEROID study) in the UK, USA and Europe, hoping to recruit 140 patients.

OI and TGF-β inhibitors (Fresolimumab)

TGF-β is a latent protein that awaits activation via osteoclastic bone resorption. Once activated and bound to its receptor, it induces smad and non-smad signalling [58]. TGF-β downstream effects vary. Osteoblast activity is reduced via different mechanisms. Osteoclasts maturation is inhibited (via RANKL / Osteoprogenitor) but conversely osteoclastogenesis is promoted through direct binding of TGF-β to osteoclasts. Thus overall TGF-β stimulation leads to more bone resorption than bone formation.

Fresolimumab is a monoclonal antibody that silences TGF- β. Studies in mice have shown that TGF-β increases bone mass, strength and quality [59]. Thus Fresolimumab has been suggested as a treatment for OI. A clinical trial in the USA is currently recruiting to evaluate the safety of Fresolimumab in adults with moderate to severe OI [60].

Stem cell approaches and regenerative medicine

BOOSTB4 is a European trial using stem cells to reduce morbidity in OI. Trial partners include the universities of Leicester, Utrecht, Lund, Cologne, the Karolinska institute, GOSH and UCL. Back in 2005, 6 children with OI were treated with adult MSCs (mesenchymal stem cells) post-natally in a US trial with promising results (increased growth, reduced fracture rates) [61].

The BOOSTB4 group felt that the use of fetal MSCs (rather than adult MSCs) and earlier intervention (in utero as opposed to post natal) could lead to better results based on research from animal studies. OI is most commonly diagnosed during the fetal anomaly ultrasound scan which is performed mid pregnancy in EU countries, thus antenatal treatment is possible. Fetal MSCs are felt to have greater colony-forming capacity and superior proliferative potential than adult MSCs thus greater therapeutic potential.

Since the US trial, researchers from within the BOOSTB4 consortium treated 4 more children ad-hoc using fetal MSCs (some post-natal, some antenatal). The children showed reduced fracture rates and improved growth [62]. By 2018 the 10 treated children were aged 3 to 16 years. Regulatory approval for the trial in Sweden was awarded in October 2018, and is currently in application in the UK and Germany. The trial has yet to start but one can keep up to date via the website [63]. It aims to recruit 15 families with foetuses affected by OI and infuse them with MSCs during the 2nd-3rd trimester, as well as another 15 who will receive MSCs after birth. All participants are to be followed for 10 years [64].

Fetal stem cell transplants are not new, with similar treatments attempted since the 1980’s and for other conditions (thalassaemia, sickle cell, severe immune deficiency), though responses have been mixed. Should this trial be successful it opens a whole new world for treatment of many different disorders. Despite this, stem cell approaches in OI do not aim to cure, since the patient will still have their own defective bone cells mixed with infused unaffected bone cells. Additionally there is concern that the MSCs proliferate into unwanted cancer cells.

Thus the door is open for further technologies dealing with the root genetic change. Hence approaches such as constructs to inactivate COL1A1 have also been explored, especially with new technologies; prime editing, CRISPR-CAS, TALEN and zinc finger nucleases [65]. Silencing of the dominant allele in OI would result in a milder phenotype and attempts using siRNAs, shRNA (short hairpin RNA) and antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) have been promising, though mainly invitro and ex vivo. Besio et al. gives a comprehensive overview of recent gene and cellular therapy approaches [66]. Raloxifene (an oestrogen receptor modulator) is another experimental treatment shown to decrease fracture rates in mice (2016), though no human trials have been reported [67].

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) and X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH)

It is important to note that the ‘osteoblast / osteoblast / osteocyte’ triad is not the only mechanistic pathway to low bone mineral density. Here we discuss mechanisms of defective bone mineralisation leading to low bone density conditions.

HPP and XLH are both rare genetic skeletal conditions. Though similarly sounding they are quite different. Biochemically HPP leads to markedly low levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (raised or high normal plasma calcium and phosphate, low PTH) whereas XLH leads to low levels of phosphate. The underlying problem in HPP is inactive ALP which in turn leads to poor bone mineralisation. In XLH the kidneys are unable to resorb phosphate as normal, leading to low serum phosphate levels, thus lack of a key building block for bone formation.


Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is multi-systemic metabolic dysplasia inherited in autosomal dominant or recessive fashion, caused by loss of function mutations in the ALPL gene which encodes the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase enzyme (TNSALP) leading to defective bone mineralisation [68]. TNSALP is highly expressed in several different tissues; bones (in osteoblasts / chondrocytes), liver, kidneys and teeth, hence the ‘non-specific’ title.

Reduced phosphatase (TNSALP) activity results in elevated serum inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), the biochemical villain in HPP. PPi is a substrate of TNSALP and an inhibitor of hard tissue mineralisation, sometimes described as the body’s ‘natural water softener’. High levels of PPi (substrate accumulation) block hydroxyapatite crystal growth, resulting in impaired bone or tooth mineralisation and thus rachitic symptoms [69] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

HPP mechanism of disease. Image used under the creative commons attribution license 3.0 from Bowden et al. [69]

There are 6 clinical forms of HPP (perinatal severe, perinatal benign, infantile, childhood/juvenile, adult and odontohypophosphotasia) [70]. Residual activity levels of TNSALP and age of onset correspond with levels of disease severity. Though one needs to be careful as the benign form can look very serious inutero but runs a mild course.

The dominant and adult forms of HPP tend to run a milder course, whereas the perinatal natal and infantile forms tend to be more severe due to respiratory complications resulting from narrow chest and pulmonary hypoplasia, and often the bones are extremely difficult to visualise radiographically [71]. Children with HPP tend to have soft abnormally shaped skull bones, short stature, bowed legs / knock knees, enlarged wrists and ankle joints, and hypercalcaemia which itself can lead to recurrent vomiting and kidney problems. Teeth can be lost prematurely (both primary and adult) and recurrent fractures heal poorly and can cause chronic pain. Craniosynostosis and vitamin B6 responsive seizures are frequent features in HPP. In adults findings are more subtle with crystal arthropathy, osteoporosis and recurrent fractures.

Previous treatments for HPP were symptomatic (low calcium diet) or involved IV infusion of ALP rich plasma from patients with Paget’s or purified placental ALP, teriparatide ‘off-label’ and bone marrow transplantation. These strategies have showed mild disease improvement but have been ineffective overall. Bisphosphonates are contraindicated as they are chemically analogous to PPI (which accumulates in HPP). The emergence of Asfotase Alfa (AA) has been revolutionary in the field [69].

AA (developed by Alexion pharmaceuticals) is a recombinant glycoprotein that contains the catalytic domain (active site) of TNSALP (i.e. hence is an ERT, enzyme replacement therapy) and therefore enables proper degradation of PPi. AA is administered subcutaneously in patients with perinatal, infantile, and juvenile-onset HPP. It gained FDA and European approval in 2015. Since its introduction several clinical trials and case reports have illustrated dramatic improvement in infantile HPP with reversal of skeletal mineralisation defects and improved survival [72]. AA has also shown improvement in quality of life / mobility in children and adults as well as improved growth in children [69].

Following the impressive results in severe forms of HPP, some suggest that AA should be considered in adult HPP under certain scenarios that are attributable to HPP; “musculoskeletal pain requiring prescription pain medications, disabling polyarthropathy, disabling functional impairment, low-trauma fractures, poor fracture healing, repeated orthopaedic surgeries for HPP and low BMD T-score in certain scenarios” [73]. The cost benefit ratio would need rigorous evaluation before such suggestions were conducted, and currently the evidence base for such strategies is very limited.

So far results from AA clinical trials have shown very good safety profiles with the main side effect limited to injection site reactions with marked scarring. Currently, all patients develop anti AA antibodies but no tachyphylaxis (diminishing response to successive drug doses). AA may potentially be an agent for other conditions that lead to abnormal accumulation of PPi such as neurofibromatosis type 1.

Despite these results there are several drawbacks with AA. Injections are frequent (3–6 times per week), cost, injection site reactions, possible long term tachyphylaxis and lifetime requirement of the drug. Thus alternatives to AA are still in development.

Alternatives to AA

Gene therapies using lentivirus (LV) and adeno-associated virus delivery of TNASLP have shown impressive results with single injections in animal studies, though these have not been translated in clinical human studies [74].

Interestingly BPS804 (a full human anti-sclerostin antibody) was trialled (phase IIA) in 8 adult patients affected by HPP in 2017 and showed promising results. SOST is an extracellular inhibitor of the Wnt pathway, thus downregulates osteoblastic bone formation, SOST inhibitors are therefore osteoanabolic. The authors considered that besides substrate accumulation (PPi) and deficient mineralisation, HPP is also marked by low bone turnover (through purinergic signalling) thus there is reduced bone formation [75]. By using BPS804 the study team hypothesised that sclerostin antagonism would lead to improved bone formation, increased BMD, upregulation of TNSALP and bone specific ALP.

The 8 patients were given escalating doses of the drug on 3 occasions over a month, and the followed up over 4 months. Results showed increased serum ALP enzymatic levels (including bone specific ALP), decreased bone resorption markers (C telopeptide of type 1 collagen, CTX-1) and increased bone formation markers (procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, PINP, osteocalcin and PTH) [76]. PPi was not assessed as there is no assay for evaluating PPi in human samples. Results were similar to those observed in patients with osteoporosis treated with anti-sclerostin therapy. The increase in ALP was well below the increase seen in healthy subjects. Indicating the molecular defect cannot be overcome by anti-sclerostin treatment but can be ameliorated.


XLH, also known as vitamin D-resistant rickets is the commonest heritable and non-nutritional form of rickets, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 20,000 live births (from a Japanese study) and prevalence of 1 in 60,000 (from a Norwegian study) [77, 78]. XLH is a X linked dominant bone dysplasia caused by PHEX gene (phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome) mutations. PHEX encodes the PHEX protein which regulates the FGF23 (fibroblast growth factor 23) hormone which is secreted from osteocytes. Normally FGF23 inhibits the kidneys ability to reabsorb phosphate to the blood stream and degrades vitamin D (1, 25-dihydroxyvit D) hence patients have low serum phosphate, high urinary phosphate and low or inappropriately normal serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. Classically boys are more severely affected then girls.

Inactivating mutations in the PHEX gene lead to FGFR23 over activity via mechanisms that remain incompletely understood.

The abnormal phosphate handling leads to phosphate wasting (high urinary phosphate) and insufficient phosphate for bone remodelling, thus weak and soft bones leading to bowed legs, bone pain, short stature and delayed walking. XLH usually manifests in childhood and is also associated with hearing loss, craniosynostosis, and dental abnormalities. By adulthood as disease progresses, patients can experience worsening bone deformity, bone pain, pseudofractures, enthesopathies and arthritis.

According to NICE, there are approximately 250 patients with XLH in the UK, though we assume this is an underestimate based on the earlier discussed Norwegian prevalence data, which if mapped to the UK population would suggest around 1000 cases [79]. Conventional therapy includes daily oral phosphate and activated vitamin D replacement and if started early does improve height, reduces bowing and the need for corrective surgery, though conventional therapy does not completely reverse the skeletal mineralisation defects, nor enthesopathies, and dental manifestations. Conventional therapy also requires close therapeutic monitoring to avoid hypercalcaemia, hypercalciuria, nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, and secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Phosphate supplementation (× 3–5 /day) is associated with adverse GI side effects; bloating, offensive stools, abdominal pain and urgency.

New personalised treatments in XLH targeting FGF23

In April 2018, the FDA approved Burosumab (Crysvita), an anti-FGF23 fully human monoclonal antibody, the first treatment to target the underlying pathophysiology of XLH. It was approved in Europe in February 2018. Crysvita increases the levels of the sodium phosphate co-transporter in the proximal kidney tubules and increases 1 alpha hydroxylase (the enzyme that coverts 25 hydroxylase to the active form of vitamin D).

NICE, in their draft guidance (mid 2018) rejected the drug on the grounds of cost, and uncertainty in the data around the benefits to young people aged 13–17 [80]. Subsequently, in September 2018, they approved the drug following a commercial arrangement with the company (Ultragenyx / Kyowa), making Crysvita provide ‘value of money’. Patients with PHEX mutations or a FH (family history) of XLH are eligible for Burosumab. Whilst NHS England try to implement the NICE guidance in full, Crysvita is being provided for eligible patients at no cost via the UK’s Early Access to Medicines programme.

Crysvita is taken as a two weekly injection from age 1 year until the skeleton stops growing. Peak bone mass is usually obtained in the third decade of life.

Metaphyseal dysplasia

The cost of developing a new drug in 2016 was estimated at $2.87 billion [81]. Experts suggest this is halved (or quartered) for rare diseases, as understanding of the molecular basis and related pathophysiology is often well described in rare diseases. Drug companies suggest profitability for orphan disease drugs is low citing small patient numbers. This argument is countered by that fact that the patient population is usually readily available, often spread across only 1–2 centres, thus decreasing the delivery pipeline cost. Also, drugs tend to be needed life-long, there is often a lack of competitors and orphan disease drug discovery can potentially lead to easy gains for other conditions.

Despite these arguments, investment in new orphan disease drugs is relatively low. Thus drug repurposing, has been a useful strategy. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a well-known drug, used in epilepsy treatment for over 50 years, is being repurposed for patients with Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia Schmid type (MCDS) and Schwartz-Jampel syndrome (SJS).

SJS is a very rare AR condition - AD cases have been reported - caused by HSPG2 gene (Perlecan / Heparin Sulphate proteoglycan-2) mutations. Perlecan proteins are important in musculoskeletal development and are found in the pericellular matrix of chondrocytes. Key features of the condition include typical facial features (blepharophimosis, sad fixed facies, ptosis, small mouth with pursed lips, small high pitched voice) muscle hypertrophy and continuous myotonia. Skeletal abnormalities are often described but can be absent (short stature, scoliosis, joint contractures, bowing long bones, pectus carinatum, congenital hip dysplasia and metaphyseal dysplasia). Skeletal muscles are stiff and resistant to passive movement even at rest or sleep. Topaloglu et al. successfully showed improvement in myotonia for three SJS patients using CBZ in 1993. A further case report in 1997 demonstrated dramatic improvement in an infant’s skeletal symptoms post CBZ therapy, improvement felt to be due to relaxation of myotonia and therefore subsequent lessening of skeletal features [82].

MCDS is an AD condition caused by mutations in type X collagen, leading to short limb dwarfism. Mutations in type X collagen leads to misfolded collagen X, retained within the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of hypertrophic chondrocytes causing increased ER stress. ER stress leads to the unfolded protein response and ultimately disruption of the normal growth plate and bone growth [83]. CBZ is able to reduce ER stress by stimulating intracellular degradation through autophagy or proteasomal degradation. This has been demonstrated in MCDS mouse models showing a reduction in severity of phenotypic features [84]. Michael Wright and colleagues in Newcastle are currently recruiting for a phase 1/11a investigator-led clinical trial, testing CBZ in ambulant MCDS children up to age 11 years (before growth plates fuse). UK recruitment opened April 2019 and 6 patients have been recruited so far (August 2019) with a further 6 spaces available for stage 1. The initial stage involves a 12 month observational study. This will be followed by a 12 month dosing stage at which point International partners will be eligible to recruit to. More information about the trial can be found at the trial website [85]. Diagnosis of MCDS is primarily made based on skeletal survey findings (metaphyseal abnormalities of upper and lower limbs, coxa vara, tibial and femoral bowing). Patients present with short bowed long bones, short stature, normal trunk length, no facial dysmorphism, waddling gaits and short broad hands.

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)

FOP is an extremely rare and severely disabling AD condition, in which damaged fibrous tissue (e.g. muscle) turns into bone, affecting 1–2 per million population. FOP is caused by activating mutations in the ACVR1 gene (Activin A receptor, type 1), classically c.617G > A R206H mutations. This mutation leads to over activation of BMP-Smad1/5/8 signalling and promotes ectopic chondrogenesis and osteogenesis.

The Activin A receptor accepts several different ligands including Activin A (a non-canonical ligand) and other type 1 BMPs (bone morphogenic proteins) [86]. Activin A binding to mutant ACVR1 (R206H), activates SMAD 1/5/8 signalling, whereas binding to w/t ACVR1 leads to down-regulation of the SMAD 1/5/8 pathway [87, 80].

In FOP, muscle and connective tissue ossify during ‘flare-ups’, often due to tissue trauma but sometimes in its absence. The HO (heterotopic ossification or extra-skeletal bone growth) forms a second skeleton. This process begins in childhood, leading to joint dysfunction and whole-body movement constraint leading to feeding and breathing difficulties and premature death. Many patients are wheelchair bound by their third decade. Individuals affected by FOP tend to have congenital large halluces and short thumbs.

Treatments in FOP

The current standard of care includes glucocorticoids in the acute ‘flare-up’ setting but this does little to prevent subsequent HO. Surgical removal of HO results in extreme bone growth. Several studies are however under way assessing new treatments for FOP including Palovarotene, REGN2477 and rapamycin.

REGN 2477 (anti Activin A)

Activin A stimulates HO in FOP and is known to be released from innate immune cells, hence the link between inflammation and HO. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals showed that anti-Activin A (REGN 2477) showed significant efficacy in mouse studies at preventing HO and regression of HO lesions. REGN 2477 is currently in phase 2 trials ( registry NCT03188666). It is important to consider that Activin A is ubiquitously expressed and is important in neuronal differentiation and inflammation thus effects of anti-Activin A need careful monitoring.

Palovarotene (retinoid agonist, previously known as R667)

Retinoid signalling is important in chondrogenesis and proper skeletal formation [89].

Pre-clinical studies show that all-trans retinoic acid therapy leads to repression of chondrogenesis and cartilage formation (by blocking differentiation of chondroblasts). In FOP, HO proceeds through a cartilage intermediate via enchondral ossification. This explains why retinoids are an attractive target. But non-selective retinoid therapy is non-specific and has many side effects; including teratogenicity, fetal limb malformations. And muco-cutaneous side effects.

There are three retinoic acid receptors (RARs);α, β, and γ. RARγ is expressed in chondrocytes and mesenchymnal precursor cells [90]. Palovarotene is a highly selective RAR-γ agonist.

Animal studies in 2011 showed that RAR-γ agonists (including Palovarotene) blocked new bone formation in genetically modified ‘knock-in’ mice with FOP containing an active ACVR1 receptor [91]. By 2016 a multi-centre phase 2 clinical trial supported by Clementia Pharmaceutical was published, involving 40 subjects with average age, 22 years. Palovarotene decreased the percentage of patients with FOP who develop HO, improved flare-up resolution and decreased patient reported pain [92]. Palovarotene is currently in phase 3 trials.


Rapamycin (Sirolimus), a relatively common drug, used for immunosuppression post-transplant surgery and to treat lymphangioleiomyomatosis in Tuberous Sclerosis.

Rapamycin targets mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) and therefore multiple signalling pathways including HIF1α (hypoxia inducing factor 1 alpha). The mTOR pathway interacts with the RANKL/RANK system though it is not exactly clear how.

A drug screen of over 6800 substances on induced pluripotent stems cells (iPSC) grown to mimic FOP showed inhibited abnormal bone formation with rapamycin. The FOP iPSCs were transplanted into mice and bone inhibition was demonstrated.

Rapamycin has been used in two paediatric patients with FOP at pharmacological doses for 3 months and 18 years respectively (the latter to prevent Liver transplant rejection). In neither case did it show clinical response from a FOP point of view. Despite this a clinical trial evaluating its efficacy in FOP is underway at Kyoto University Hospital [93].

Emerging drug therapies in FOP

Imatinib, often used for chronic myeloid leukaemia, has been used off-label in several children with FOP with relentless flare-ups refractory to standard care [94]. Six of the seven showed dramatic improvements with limited side effects, though this was not a RCT. It is thought that Imatinibs’ effects in FOP are mediated through interaction of multiple pathways including HIF1α and MAP kinase signalling.

Another key strategy is to target the tyrosine kinase activity caused by the ACVR1 mutation through Saracatinib. Several drug companies are developing agents (BCX9250, BCX9499, and BLU-782) on the back of promising preliminary invitro and in vivo studies.

Another promising drug is LDN-212854 a BMP type 1 receptor inhibitor that has shown specificity for ACVR1.

In the long term drugs that target the underlying genetic error, gene overexpression – such as RNA interference, will prove a powerful method to combat the disease but as yet the challenges remains with delivery of such therapies to reach the target without unwanted off-target effects [95].

It is an exciting time in terms of drug development for FOP. Combinational therapy at multiple target levels would seem to be the future.

Genetic bone tumours

An often striking and relatively common presenting clinical feature in children is bony lumps / growths. If bony lumps are multiple or familial, then two important AD inherited diagnoses need consideration; HME (Hereditary Multiple Exostosis also known as Hereditary Osteochondromatosis) and Metachondromatosis (MC). HME has an estimated incidence of 1/50,000 live births affecting males and females equally, though males more severly. Fewer than 100 case of MC have been reported [96]. It can be difficult to distinguish the two but is more important than ever to do so, as trials of potentially disease modifying drugs in HME are under way. Additionally, HME lesions have greater malignant potential than in MC, and MC lesions often regress so surgery can be unnecessary, unlike in HME where patients may need multiple surgeries [97].

HME involves multiple exostoses (osteochondromas). Exostoses are cartilaginous capped bony growths that arise next to and grow away from the growth plate (they ‘never’ originate from the growth plate). MC involves both osteochondromas and enchondromas (intraosessous hyaline cartilage based lesions arising from the metaphysis or diaphysis). Enchondromas are often orientated towards the epiphyses rather than away [98]. Thus a bony growth arising mid-shaft may indicate an enchondroma, but presentations of lesions are not usually so obvious. Radiographs are key to identifying enchondromas but diagnosis is still difficult if bone lesions arise in the metaphyses. In such cases, MRI scans distinguish truly intraosseous enchondroma lesions, but one has to weigh up the anaesthetic risk for paediatric MRIs against the benefit of early diagnosis.

Another key ‘history’ distinguishing feature is ‘natural course’. MC lesions tend to regress by adulthood, whereas HME lesions often only plateau (around puberty) rather than regress, though new HME lesions do not to arise in adulthood. Lesions in HME / MC tend not to be painful themselves but can cause pain through pressure on local structures, in addition to nerve or vascular compression, reduced joint movement, bone deformity and cosmetic disfigurement requiring surgery [90]. Treatment is not always required in HME if the bony lesions are small. HME is caused by mutations in EXT1 (69%) and EXT2 (21%) genes (about 10% are denovo), and MC by activating mutations in the PTPN11 gene [90] (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of key bone tumour conditions and emerging therapies

Retinoic acid as a treatment for HME?

A new international phase 2 clinical trial for HME called the MO-Ped trial ( identifier: NCT03442985) sponsored by Clementia pharmaceuticals completed patient enrolment in August 2018. The trial drug (Palovarotene) is an orally based selective retinoic acid treatment. Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of HME with mutations in EXT1 or EXT2 and be between ages 2–14 years (confirmation testing can occur within the trial). 240 participants will be given different doses of Palovarotene by daily oral ingestion over a 24 month period [104]. Patients with contiguous gene deletions (Langer Gideon syndrome for EXT1 and Potocki Schaffer syndrome for EXT2 are not eligible for the trial).

HME causes osteochondromas (cartilage capped bony growths) thus enchondral ossification is the key bone formation method. As discussed in therapies for FOP, retinoids cause repression of chondrogenesis and cartilage formation (by blocking differentiation of chondroblasts). EXT1 and EXT2 both code for glycosyltransferase enzymes that are involved in the synthesis of heparin sulphate, a critical component of cartilage. Heparin sulphate is a key part of the matrix and important in regulating other signalling. Absence of heparin sulphate leads to local increase in BMPs and smads which ultimately leads to abnormal budding of osteochondromas at bone growth plates (exostoses).

Palovarotene (a RAR-γ agonist) has been shown to block new bone formation in genetically modified mice. Osteochondroma count is reduced by upto 91 and 92% in ribs and long bones respectively of HME mice (mean %), when considering the 1.76 mg/kg/d dosing regimen. Improvement was also seen in long bone length and histology [105].

Considering the potential teratogenic side effects of such therapy, females of child bearing age undergoing treatment would need to take highly effective methods to prevent pregnancy. Other concerns include the risk to mental health with an association described between isoretinoin and depression / suicide risk / long term mental health problems (when used in the treatment of acne).

Non-hereditary bony lumps; Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome

Non-hereditary conditions such as Ollier disease and Mafucci syndrome (both caused by somatic mosaicism) are important differentials in patients presenting with bony lumps, especially as HME or MC can present denovo, so family history can be non-discriminatory. The key distinguishing features for Ollier’s is that the multiple echondromas are extremely variable in size and onset, tend to occur in extremities and present unilaterally or localised to one area. Radiographically, lesions tend to cluster and calcify / stipple with time [106].

If the enchondromas are non-hereditary and associated with vascular malformations (often venous but also haemangiomas) or lympahngiomas or phleboliths then the diagnosis of Maffucci syndrome should be considered. Maffucci syndrome usually presents in childhood in the extremities (with a preponderance of the hands over the feet).

One should also consider other differentials: Spondylo-enchondroplasia with immune dysregulation (SPENCDI, APC5 gene, recessive inheritance, which features autoimmune disorders, neurological sequalae and intellectual deficit) and genochondromatosis (gene unknown, AD, whereby enchondromas present throughout the body especially over the clavicles and knees [107].


In conducting this review, using Pubmed as our principle search database, we note its’ bias towards North American, European and Japanese publications as well as bias towards publishing studies with positive findings, limited inclusion of conference proceedings and ‘grey’ literatures. We partially overcame some of this bias by identifying conference proceedings from the 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research annual meeting and 2017 ISDS (International Skeletal Dysplasia Society) conference and 2019 SDG (Skeletal Dysplasia Group) UK Treatments update symposium.

Change is the only constant in the evolving therapeutic landscape of skeletal disorders. In the last 15 years the pace of change has been rapid as the scientific community, with the aid of genetic advances, better understand the biological mechanisms of these rare but important conditions. It is impossible to summarise all the new knowledge gained from the study of rare skeletal disorders in even a review.

Van Buchem disease / sclerosteosis and the discovery of the SOST gene are a great example of novel gene identification leading to novel targets for common conditions. They led to the development of anti-sclerostin therapies for osteoporosis and other low bone mass disorders. Equally the discovery of CTSK (cathepsin) as the cause of pycnodysostosis has led to the development of a new class of bone resorptive drugs; CTSK inhibitors, which have been trialled for osteoarthritis. Ironically though these rare conditions in particular have unlocked therapies for common conditions, affected patients are still without treatment. This highlights the difficulty of drug development in rare disease where financial returns on invested resources can be deemed relatively minimal. Additional challenges for rare diseases apply, such as small patient groups, difficulty in measuring clinical end points and trials in paediatric populations. Strategies to overcome these challenges include readily identifiable patient populations, often limited to 1–2 national centres, motivated patient groups, lack of competing drugs, active research interest both by clinicians and academia, adaptive licenses for rapid trials and translational work and potentially life-long treatments. Nevertheless, it is important to continue to discover new genes for the many as yet undiagnosed and unexplained skeletal syndromes / phenotypes.

Gene therapies the way forward?

The first gene therapy was developed in 1990 for recessive severe combined immune deficiency. Since then therapies have been developed for B-thalassaemia major, adrenoleukodystrophy, haemophilia, CLL, ALL, Leber’s congenital amaourosis (LCA) and Huntington disease amongst others [108].

Yet we have seen limited progress in terms of gene therapies for inherited bone disorders. Perhaps cost is the biggest obstacle. The cost of Luxturna gene therapy for LCA in both eyes (that leads to dramatic improvement in vision, but is not a cure) was reported as $850,000 in 2018. Though this price may seem astonishingly high, it is a one-off cost and if compared to the market price of other recent gene therapies like Nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy - which costs$750,000 in the first year, then $350,000 per year thereafter - Luxturna is relatively cheap [109, 110]. It seems the cost of development of such drugs and the current technologies limit the development of gene therapies in the rare bone disorders field. Though if compared to standard treatments such as bone marrow transplants they may not be as expensive as thought. In 2017 there were 899 clinical trials involving gene based therapies worldwide, so no doubt progress is near [111].


Inherited bone dysplasias though individually rare and often unique in terms of the causative gene, share similar pathophysiological and molecular pathways in altering the bone function of the body. The study of skeletal disorders has greatly expanded our understanding of normal skeletal physiology and bone signalling pathways, suggesting new targets and strategies for improving skeletal health. It has also led to the development and or repurposing of therapies for common and rare conditions,

In compiling this review we have come across a broad range of different strategies for therapeutic interventions in rare GSDs;

  • treating osteoclastic over activity

  • targeted enzymes (enzyme replacement therapies) and proteins e,g. HPP TNSALP

  • monoclonal antibodies; Denosumab (RANKL inhibitor for OI and FOP), Setrusumab (sclerostin antibody in HPP and osteoporosis)

  • small molecule approaches (e.g. peptides, CNP in Achondroplasia),

  • protein decoys (TA-46, sFGFR decoy in Achondroplasia)

  • cell based approaches (mesenchymal stem cells in OI, bone marrow cell transplant in osteopetrosis)

  • gene based therapy

    • gene silencing

    • siRNA (RNA interference for CLCN7 ADO type 2) (Table 4)

Table 4 Summary table of conditions discussed and related treatments

Whilst awaiting breakthroughs with cell and gene based approaches, repurposing of drugs has a major role in improving patient morbidity. We highlighted the useful approach of drug screening on cell lines or mouse models which not only highlighted candidate drugs, but provided clues to pathological mechanisms involved in the dysplasia. Key drugs in current clinical trials include;

  • Carbamazepine (for MCDS, SJS), due to its role in ER stress.

  • Lithium carbonate (for OPPG) due its role in WNT signalling activation.

Should these trials prove successful they may open the role for these drugs to be used in other skeletal disorders due to the broad mechanisms of action. For example lithium carbonate roles in WNT signalling may suggest it valuable in other conditions where WNT signalling is important such as HPP.

By considering the skeletal dysplasia as a group it allows one to consider the common mechanisms of disease and the usage of novel / effective therapies across several disease groups. Palovarotene (a retinoic acid agent) showed utility in clinical trials for FOP, a condition that causes heterotopic ossification, thus the drug is being trialled in HME, a condition that is defined by heterotopic ossification. When studying / treating a rare disease it is therefore useful to look at the related conditions and the emerging treatments for those conditions as this can unlock possible therapeutic options for the disease of interest.

For diseases that have very small numbers of patients it is opportunistic to study the effects of a common therapy on the multiple different disease cohorts to better appreciate the similarities and differences in clinical responses. For example, Denosumab (RANKL inhibitor) and its use in OI and FOP.

As our understanding of the mechanisms involved within the bone mineral unit, conversion of osteoblasts to osteocytes, maturation of osteoclasts and related mechanisms evolve, new osteoblastic, osteocytic and osteoclastic therapeutic targets will no doubt emerge.

We eagerly await the results of many of the discussed trials as successful results may prove to be fundamental for not only the studied skeletal dysplasia but for many other conditions. In particular the BOOSTB4 trial of in-utero mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for OI could open the use of this approach in many other rare diseases. Especially for conditions like RANKL related ARO since it would not benefit from HSCT (RANKL genetic defects originate from mesencyhmal cells not haemopoietic stem cells).

Novel approaches like induced pluripotent stem cells, may prove to be pivotal in development of drugs in rare disease. Professor Shinya Yamanka (Kyoto University) - winner of the 2012 Nobel Prize in medicine for discovering iPSC cells - hopes the Rapamycin trial in FOP will “spur active research for drug development, and eventually lead to the discoveries of new treatment and various rare diseases”.

Given the rarity of inherited bone disorders, for progress to accelerate greater collaboration between the different stakeholders; academic research centres, universities, charities, pharmaceutical companies, biotech industries, clinics, and hospitals, is required in order to overcome the safety and regulatory issues in developing new therapies for rare patient cohorts.

Availability of data and materials

not applicable.



Asfotase Alfa



ACVR1 gene:

Activin A receptor, type 1


Autosomal dominant


AD osteopetrosis


Alkaline phosphatase


Autosomal recessive


AR osteopetrosis


Bone mineral density




Tralesinidase alfa


Bone morphogenic proteins


Bone marrow transplant




Cyclic gaunosine-3′.5′ monophosphate


C-type natriuretic peptide


C telopeptide of type 1 collagen


Extracellular matrix


European Medical Agency


Endoplasmic reticulum


Extra-cellular signal regulated kinase


Enzyme replacement therapy


US Food and Drug Administration agency


Fibroblast growth factor 23


Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene


Family history


Fibrodysplasia Ossficans Progressiva


Genetic skeletal disorders




Hypoxia inducing factor 1 alpha


Hereditary Multiple Exostoses


Heterotopic ossification




Haematopoietic stem cell transplant

HSPG2 gene:

Perlecan / Heparin Sulphate proteoglycan-2


Interferon gamma-1b therapy


Induced pluripotent stems cells


Leber’s congenital amaourosis


Low density lipoprotein 5




Mitogen-activated protein kinase




Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia Schmid type


Messenger RNA


mesenchymal stem cells


Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1




Natriuretic-peptide receptor B


Osteoclast differentiation factor


Antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides


Osteogenesis Imperfecta


Osteoporosis-Pseudoglioma Syndrome

PHEX gene:

Phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome


Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide


Inorganic pyrophosphate


Parathyroid hormone


Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) ligand


Retinoic acid receptors


Ribonucleic acid


Soluble FGFR3 protein


Short hairpin RNA


Short interfering RNAs


Schwartz-Jampel syndrome




Spondylo-enchondroplasia with immune dysregulation


Signal transducer and activator of transcription


Thanatotrophic dysplasia


Transforming growth factor beta


Tyrosine kinase inhibitor


Tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase enzyme.




Wild type


Wingless-related integration site




X-linked hypophosphatemia


  1. 1.

    Tosi LL, Warman ML. Mechanistic and therapeutic insights gained from studying rare skeletal diseases. Bone. 2015;76:67–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bonafe L, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Lachman R, Mortier G, Mundlos S, et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2015 revision. Am J Med Gen Part A. 2015;167(12):2869–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yap P, Savarirayan R. Emerging targeted drug therapies in skeletal disorders. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2016;170(10):2596–604.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jelin AC, O'Hare E, Blakemore K, Jelin EB, Valle D, Hoover-Fong J. Skeletal disorders: Growing therapy for growing bones. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nikkel SM. Skeletal Disorders: What Every Bone Health Clinician Needs to Know. Curr Osteoporosis Rep. 2017;15(5):419–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bacon S, Crowley R. Developments in rare bone diseases and mineral disorders. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018;9(1):51–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yasoda A, et al. Overexpression of CNP in chondrocytes rescues achondroplasia through a MAPK-dependent pathway. Nat Med. 2004;10(1):80–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Duarte SP, Rocha ME, Bidondo MP, Liascovich R, Barbero P, Groisman B. Bone disorders in 1.6 million births in Argentina. Eur J Med Genet. 2018.

  9. 9.

    Pauli RM. Achondroplasia: a comprehensive clinical review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Unger S, Bonafé L, Gouze E. Current care and investigational therapies in achondroplasia. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15(2):53–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wynn J, King TM, Gambello MJ, Waller DK, Hecht JT. Mortality in achondroplasia study: A 42-year follow-up. Am J Med Genets Part A. 2007;143(21):2502–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Arenas MA, del Pino M, Fano V. FGFR3-related hypochondroplasia: longitudinal growth in 57 children with the p. Asn540Lys mutation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018;31(11):1279–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pauli RM, Botto LD. Achondroplasia. In: Management of Genetic Syndromes. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mortier G, Nuytinck L, Craen M, Renard JP, Leroy JG, De Paepe A. Clinical and radiographic features of a family with hypochondroplasia owing to a novel Asn540Ser mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene. J Med Genet. 2000;37(3):220–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Peake NJ, Hobbs AJ, Pingguan-Murphy B, Salter DM, Berenbaum F, et al. Role of C-type natriuretic peptide signalling in maintaining cartilage and bone function. Osteoarth Cartilage. 2014;22(11):1800–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Beyond Achondroplasia [internet]. 2018. Available from: [cited 2018 December 18].

  17. 17.

    Noonberg S. BMN 111: vosoritide for achondroplasia. Biomarin R&D Day. 2016:98–135.

  18. 18.

    Savarirayan R, Irving M, Bacino CA, Bostwick B, Charrow J, Cormier-Daire V, et al. C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Analogue Therapy in Children with Achondroplasia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(1):25–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Olney RC, Prickett TC, Espiner EA, Mackenzie WG, Duker AL, Ditro C, et al. C-type natriuretic peptide plasma levels are elevated in subjects with achondroplasia, hypochondroplasia, and thanatophoric dysplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E355–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wendt DJ, Dvorak-Ewell M, Bullens S, Lorget F, Bell SM, Peng J, et al. Neutral endopeptidase-resistant C-type natriuretic peptide variant represents a new therapeutic approach for treatment of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3–related dwarfism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;353:132–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Therachon. [internet]. 2018. Available from: [cited 2019 January 5].

  22. 22.

    Webster MK, d'Avis PY, Robertson SC, Donoghue DJ. Profound ligand-independent kinase activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the activation loop mutation responsible for a lethal skeletal dysplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia type II. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(8):4081–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Monsonego-Ornan E, Adar R, Feferman T, Segev O, Yayon A. The transmembrane mutation G380R in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 uncouples ligand-mediated receptor activation from down-regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(2):516–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Daghlian M, Pfizer Pays $340 Million for Achondroplasia Therapy Developer Therachon. 2018. Available from: [cited on August 16 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Garcia S, Dirat B, Tognacci T, Rochet N, Mouska X, Bonnafous S, et al. Postnatal soluble FGFR3 therapy rescues achondroplasia symptoms and restores bone growth in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(203):203ra124.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pfizer. Product Pipeline. 2019. Available from: [cited on August 16 2019].

  27. 27.

    Matsushita M, Hasegawa S, Kitoh H, Mori K, Ohkawara B, Yasoda A, Masuda A, et al. Meclozine promotes longitudinal skeletal growth in transgenic mice with achondroplasia carrying a gain-of-function mutation in the FGFR3 gene. Endocrinology. 2014;156(2):548–54.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Matsushita M. UMIN CTR Clinical Trial. 2018. Available from: [cited on December 5 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kombla-Ebri D, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 functionally improves FGFR3-related dwarfism in mouse model. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1871–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    De Ridder R, Boudin E, Mortier G, Van Hul W. Human Genetics of Sclerosing Bone Disorders. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(3):256–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bollerslev J, Henriksen K, Frost M, Brixen K, Van Hul W. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis revisited: lessons from recent studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;EJE-13.

  32. 32.

    Radswiki. Sandwich vertebral body. 2018. Available from: [cited on December 16 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Thudium CS, Moscatelli I, Flores C, Thomsen JS, Brüel A, Gudmann NS, et al. A comparison of osteoclast-rich and osteoclast-poor osteopetrosis in adult mice sheds light on the role of the osteoclast in coupling bone resorption and bone formation. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;95(1):83–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stark Z, Savarirayan R. Osteopetrosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4(1):5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Key LL Jr, Rodriguiz RM, Willi SM, Wright NM, Hatcher HC, Eyre DR, et al. Long-term treatment of osteopetrosis with recombinant human interferon gamma. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(24):1594–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Key L, Carnes D, Cole S, Holtrop M, Bar-Shavit Z, Shapiro F, Arceci R, Steinberg J, Gundberg C, Kahn A, Teitelbaum S. Treatment of congenital osteopetrosis with high-dose calcitriol. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(7):409–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wu CC, Econs MJ, LA DM, Insogna KL, Levine MA, Orchard PJ, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Osteopetrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Osteopetrosis Working Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017.

  38. 38.

    Maurizi A, Capulli M, Patel R, Curle A, Rucci N, Teti A. RNA interference therapy for autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2. Towards the preclinical development. Bone. 2018;110:343–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Goessl C, Katz L, Dougall WC, et al. The development of denosumab for the treatment of diseases of bone loss and cancer-induced bone destruction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1263:29–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chung PY, van Hul W. Paget's disease of bone: evidence for complex pathogenetic interactions. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(5):619–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lo Iacono N, Pangrazio A, Abinun M, Bredius R, Zecca M, Blair HC, et al. RANKL cytokine: from pioneer of the osteoimmunology era to cure for a rare disease. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;15:2013.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Streeten EA, McBride D, Puffenberger E, Hoffman ME, Pollin TI, et al. Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome: description of 9 new cases and beneficial response to bisphosphonates. Bone. 2008;43(3):584–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Papapoulos SE. Bisphosphonates: how do they work? Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22(5):831–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Clément-Lacroix P, Ai M, Morvan F, Roman-Roman S, Vayssière B, Belleville C, Estrera K, et al. Lrp5-independent activation of Wnt signaling by lithium chloride increases bone formation and bone mass in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(48):17406–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Streeten E. Trial of Lithium Carbonate for Treatment of Osteoporosis-Pseudoglioma Syndrome. 2018. Available from: [cited 2018 December 5].

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kedlaya R, Veera S, Horan DJ, Moss RE, Ayturk UM, Jacobsen CM, et al. Sclerostin inhibition reverses skeletal fragility in an Lrp5-deficient mouse model of OPPG syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(211):211ra158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Steiner RD, Adsit J, Basel D. COL1A1/2-related osteogenesis imperfect, Gene Reviews. 2014. Available from: [cited December 8 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Xu XJ, Lv F, Song YW, Li LJ, Wei XX. Zhao XL, et al Novel mutations in BMP1 induce a rare type of osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;489:21–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sillence DO, Rimoin DL, Danks DM. Clinical variability in osteogenesis imperfecta- variable expressivity or genetic heterogeneity. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15:113–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Van Dijk FS, Sillence DO. Osteogenesis imperfecta: Clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity assessment. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2014;164A:1470–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Shapiro J. Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Translational Approach to Brittle Bone Disease. Academic Press. Chapter 2; 2014. p. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Dwan K, Phillipi CA, Steiner RD, Basel D. Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10.

  53. 53.

    Drake MT, Collins MT, Hsiao EC. The Rare Bone Disease Working Group: report from the 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Annual Meeting. Bone. 2017;102:80–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Raulston S. Treatment of OI with PTH and Zoledronic acid. 2018. Available from: [cited December 10 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Marini J, Smith SM. Osteogenesis Imperfecta. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., editors. Endotext; 2015. Available from: [cited February 14 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kobayashi T, Nakamura Y, Suzuki T, Yamaguchi T, Takeda R, Takagi M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patients with Osteoporosis—Case Series. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):479.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Glorieux FH, Devogelaer JP, Durigova M, Goemaere S, Hemsley S. Jakob Fet al. BPS804 anti-sclerostin antibody in adults with moderate osteogenesis imperfecta: results of a randomized phase 2a trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(7):1496–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016;4:16009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Grafe I, Yang T, Alexander S, Homan EP, Lietman C, Jiang MM, Bertin T, Munivez E, Chen Y, Dawson B, Ishikawa Y. Excessive transforming growth factor-β signaling is a common mechanism in osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med. 2014;20(6):670.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Multicenter study to evaluate safety of freolimumab treatment in adults with moderate to severe OI. 2019. Available from: [cited December 20 2018].

  61. 61.

    Le Blanc K, Gotherstrom C, Ringden O, Hassan M, McMahon R, Horwitz E, et al. Fetal mesenchymal stem-cell engraftment in bone after in utero transplantation in a patient with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Transplantation. 2005;79(11):1607–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Gotherstrom C, Westgren M, Shaw SW, Astrom E, Biswas A, Byers PH, et al. Pre- and postnatal transplantation of fetal mesenchymal stem cells in osteogenesis imperfecta: a two-center experience. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(2):255–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    The BOOSTB4 consortium. 2019. Available from: [cited February 20 2019].

  64. 64.

    Crouzin-Frankel J. The savior cells? Science. 2016;352(6283):284–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Chevrel G, Cimaz R. Osteogenesis imperfecta: new treatment options. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006;8(6):474–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Shapiro JR, Rowe DW. Genetic approach to treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta in Osteogenesis imperfecta. 1st ed. London: Elsevier Science and Technology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Berman AG, Wallace JM, Bart ZR, Allen MR. Raloxifene reduces skeletal fractures in an animal model of osteogenesis imperfecta. Matrix Biol. 2016;52:19–28.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Whyte MP. Hypophosphatasia: an overview for 2017. Bone. 2017;102:15–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bowden SA, Foster BL. Profile of asfotase alfa in the treatment of hypophosphatasia: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:3147.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mornet E, Nunes ME. Hypophosphatasia. Gene Rev. 2016; Available from: [cited December 20 2018].

  71. 71.

    Nishioka T, Tomatsu S, Gutierrez MA, Miyamoto KI, Trandafirescu GG, Lopez PL, et al. Enhancement of drug delivery to bone: characterization of human tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase tagged with an acidic oligopeptide. Mol Genet Metab. 2006;88:244–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Uçaktürk SA, Elmaogullari S, Ünal S, Gönülal D, Mengen E. Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Hypophosphatasia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28(9):S198–200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Shapiro JR, Lewiecki EM. Hypophosphatasia in adults: clinical assessment and treatment considerations. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(10):1977–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Iijima O, Miyake K, Watanabe A, Miyake N, Igarashi T. Kanokoda C, et al Prevention of lethal murine hypophosphatasia by neonatal ex vivo gene therapy using lentivirally transduced bone marrow cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2015;26(12):801–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kaunitz JD, Yamaguchi DT. TNAP, TrAP, ecto-purinergic signaling, and bone remodeling. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(3):655–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Seefried L, Baumann J, Hemsley S, Hofmann C, Kunstmann E, Kiese B, et al. Efficacy of anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody BPS804 in adult patients with hypophosphatasia. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(6):2148–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Endo I, Fukumoto S, Ozono K, Namba N, Inoue D, Okazaki R, et al. Nationwide survey of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23)-related hypophosphatemic diseases in Japan: prevalence, biochemical data and treatment. Endocr J. 2015:EJ15–0275.

  78. 78.

    Rafaelsen S, Johansson S, Ræder H, Bjerknes R. Hereditary hypophosphatemia in Norway: a retrospective population-based study of genotypes, phenotypes, and treatment complications. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(2):125–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Sagnowsky E. U.K. cost watchdogs turn away rare disease med Crysvita. 2018. Available from: [cited November 13 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mckee, S. NICE u-turn approves funding for rare disease therapy Crysvita. 2018. Available from: [cited November 13 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016;47:20–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Squires LA, Prangley J. Neonatal diagnosis of Schwartz-Jampel syndrome with dramatic response to carbamazepine. Pediatr Neurol. 1996;15(2):172–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Mullan LA, Mularczyk EJ, Kung LH, Forouhan M, Wragg JM, Goodacre R, et al. Increased intracellular proteolysis reduces disease severity in an ER stress–associated dwarfism. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(10):3861–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Meng Q, Chen X, Sun L, Zhao C, Sui G, Cai L. Carbamazepine promotes Her-2 protein degradation in breast cancer cells by modulating HDAC6 activity and acetylation of Hsp90. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;348(1-2):165–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    MCDS Therapy. Towards treatment for this rare bone disease. Accessed 1 May 2019.

  86. 86.

    Caja L, Bellomo C, Moustakas A. Transforming growth factor β and bone morphogenetic protein actions in brain tumors. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(14):1588–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Hatsell SJ, Idone V, Wolken DM, Huang L, Kim HJ, Wang L, et al. ACVR1R206H receptor mutation causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva by imparting responsiveness to activin A. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):303ra137.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Hino K, Ikeya M, Horigome K, Matsumoto Y, Ebise H, Nishio M, et al. Neofunction of ACVR1 in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(50):15438–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Pacifici M. Retinoid roles and action in skeletal development and growth provide the rationale for an ongoing heterotopic ossification prevention trial. Bone. 2018;109:267–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Shimono K, Tung WE, Macolino C, Chi AH, Didizian JH, Mundy C, et al. Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-gamma agonists. Nat Med. 2011;17(4):454–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Chakkalakal SA, Uchibe K, Convente MR, Zhang D, Economides AN, Kaplan FS, et al. Palovarotene inhibits heterotopic ossification and maintains limb mobility and growth in mice with the human ACVR1R206H Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(9):1666–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kaplan F. HE, Baujat G., Keen R., Grogan D., Pignolo R. Efficacy and Safety of Palovarotene in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): A Randomized, PlaceboControlled, Double-Blind Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017. 32 (Suppl1).

  93. 93.

    Wentworth KL, Masharani U, Hsiao EC. Therapeutic Advances for Blocking Heterotopic Ossification in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Brit J Clin Pharmacol. 2018.

  94. 94.

    Kaplan FS, Andolina JR, Adamson PC, Teachey DT, Finklestein JZ, Ebb DH, et al. Early clinical observations on the use of imatinib mesylate in FOP: A report of seven cases. Bone. 2018;109:276–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Shrivats AR, Hollinger JO. The delivery and evaluation of RNAi therapeutics for heterotopic ossification pathologies. Biomimetics and Stem Cells. New York: Humana Press; 2013. p. 149–60.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Fisher TJ, Williams N, Morris L, Cundy PJ. Metachondromatosis: more than just multiple osteochondromas. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(6):455–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Pacifici M. Hereditary multiple exostoses: new insights into pathogenesis, clinical complications, and potential treatments. Curr Osteopor Rep. 2017;15(3):142–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Mcfarlane J, Knight T, Sinha A, Cole T, Kiely N, Freeman R. Exostoses, enchondromatosis and metachondromatosis; diagnosis and management. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82(1).

  99. 99.

    Burgetova A, Matejovsky Z, Zikan M, Slama J, Dundr P, Skapa P, et al. The association of enchondromatosis with malignant transformed chondrosarcoma and ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor (Ollier disease). Taiwan J Obstet Gyne. 2017;56(2):253–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Fei L, Ngoh C, Porter DE. Chondrosarcoma transformation in hereditary multiple exostoses: A systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening model. J Bone Oncol. 2018;13:114–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Prokopchuk O, Andres S, Becker K, Holzapfel K, Hartmann D, Friess H. Maffucci syndrome and neoplasms: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Riou S, Morelon E, Guibaud L, Chotel F, Dijoud F, Marec-Berard P. Efficacy of rapamycin for refractory hemangioendotheliomas in Maffucci's syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):e213–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Li Z, Zhao B, Zhang Y, Tu C, Zheng Y, He X, Xiao S. Failure of rapamycin in the treatment of multiple haemangiomas associated with Maffucci syndrome. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40(8):951–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Clementia Pharmaceuticals. MO-Ped Trial for MO. 2018. Available from: [cited December 4 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Shih F, Inubushi T, Lemire I, Gossen R, Grogan D, Yamaguchi Y. Efficacy of palovarotene on prevention of osteochondroma formation in the Fsp1-Ext1 conditional knockout mouse model of Multiple Osteochondromas (MO). Poster presentation at the 13th meeting of ISDS, 2017. 2017. Available from: [cited December 4 2018].

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Silve C, Jüppner H. Ollier disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1(1):37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    O’Neil MJF, McCusik V. Genochondromatosis. 2016. Available from: [cited on February 2 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Wirth T, Parker N, Ylä-Herttuala S. History of gene therapy. Gene. 2013;525(2):162–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Herper, M. Spark Therapeutics Sets Price Of Blindness-Treating Gene Therapy At $850,000. Forbes. 2018. [cited January 4 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Moschos, S. Gene therapy is now available but could cost millions over a lifetime, says scientist. The Independent. 2018. Available from: accessed on 21.2.19. [cited January 2 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Personal Reference. Mooney P. Drug Development for Rare Disease [oral presentation]. Glaxosmith Kline, National Rare Disease Symposium, University of Birmingham. May17 2018.

Download references


We thank Dr. Andrew Bell for his thoughtful and careful reading of the manuscript, critical feedback and encouragement. We thank Mr. Nigel Kiely and Professor Timothy Barrett for their feedback on the manuscript.


The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information




Manuscript prepared and researched by AS, supervision and critique TC. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

AS is a clinical genetics registrar, TC is a consultant geneticist with an interest in skeletal dysplasia.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ataf Hussain Sabir.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

not applicable.

Consent for publication

not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, A.H., Cole, T. The evolving therapeutic landscape of genetic skeletal disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis 14, 300 (2019).

Download citation


  • Skeletal
  • Bone
  • Dysplasia
  • Rare
  • Genetic
  • Hereditary
  • Therapy
  • Personalised
  • Targeted