Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Early detection of median nerve compression by Electroneurography can improve outcome in children with Mucopolysaccharidoses

  • 1Email author,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 3 and
  • 2, 4, 5
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201813:209

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0937-9

  • Received: 6 June 2018
  • Accepted: 17 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common complication of the mucopolysaccharidoses. In severe or attenuated mucopolysaccharidoses patients, clinical symptoms of CTS usually appear at a late stage of median nerve compression. Relying on CTS symptoms is often too late and there is a risk of axonal damage and further irreversible sequelae. Electroneurography is a powerful technique to detect the initial preclinical signs of median nerve compression. In a retrospective series of 13 children with mucopolysaccharidoses (10 Hunter, one Hurler-Scheie and 2 Hurler children), we describe the electroneurography progression of CTS (43 hand evaluations) and the severity of median nerve damage.

Results

The average age at mucopolysaccharidoses diagnosis was 33.6 months (11–66 months). Clinical signs of CTS appeared on average 44.6 months (0–73 months) after diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidoses. Electroneurography anomalies suggestive of CTS appeared as early as the age of 3.5 years and probably preceded clinical signs of CTS. Median nerve compression was bilateral and distal, initially on the sensory pathway then becoming motor-sensory. Beyond a threshold of 14 m/sec median distal motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCVd) and index of terminal latency (MNCVd/MNCVp) of 0.27, there was true distal conduction slowdown.

Conclusions

To prevent irreversible sequelae of median nerve compression, we suggest annual electroneurography testing for mucopolysaccharidoses patients starting as early as 3 years of age, including both motor and sensory nerve pathways, on median and, in reference to the ulnar nerves, bilaterally at the wrist and the elbow. Timely surgical intervention can greatly improve the overall function and quality of life of these patients.

Keywords

  • Mucopolysaccharidoses
  • Hunter
  • Hurler
  • Hurler-Scheie
  • Nerve conduction study
  • Electroneurography
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Median nerve compression

Introduction

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are lysosomal storage disorders caused by defective catabolism of complex molecules, namely the glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and their consequent accumulation in cells and tissues. Their overall incidence is 1:25,000 to 1:30,000 births [1, 2]. Seven clinical subtypes have been described (MPS I-IV, VI, VII and IX) due to 11 enzyme deficiencies, coded by 11 different genes. MPS I (estimated incidence 1:100,000 births) and MPS II (estimated incidence 1:80,000 male births) are the more frequent. The MPS are chronic, progressive multivisceral disorders and show a large variability in age of onset, rate of progression and severity [3, 4]. Symptoms occur in early infancy or childhood in the most severe patients. The accumulation of mucopolysaccharides in the brain can lead to cognitive regression with loss of language and impairment of both gross and fine motor skills, as well as behavioral problems characterized by motor agitation and aggression. All cases have some degree of multiple dysostose bilaterally affecting hands, arms, legs, hips, and the spine. The resulting morphology of the hands is striking; finger joints become deformed, stiff and claw-like due to the inflexibility of the interphalangeal joints [5].

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common complication of the MPS I (Hurler, Hurler-Scheie, and Scheie), MPS II (Hunter), and MPS VI (Maroteaux-Lamy) syndromes. The combination of bone dysplasia and accumulation of surcharge products (GAG) in the connective tissue of tendons results in reduced space in the carpal canal. This osteo-ligament modification leads to the entrapment and compression of the median nerve [610].

In MPS I and MPS II, early initiation of therapies with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and/or enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) improves outcome, and can prevent or delay the development of irreversible disease manifestations [1114]. Although ERT is effective in decreasing GAG accumulation, this has not been shown to correlate with clinical improvement of CTS in the long run, and many children have required surgical interventions following ERT [15].

Early clinical signs and symptoms of CTS in children are usually nonspecific and differ from that seen in adults. Pain remains a frequent symptom; the child usually has frequent bouts of crying, especially at night, with hand rubbing. Delayed diagnosis is usually due to the subtle or atypical symptoms compounded by the often lack of communication skills due to young ages or intellectual disabilities secondary to MPS [8, 10, 14, 16]. CTS should be confirmed and managed by routine electroneurography (ENG) in MPS patients [17, 18], rendering the possibility of surgical decompression [19] to avoid significant and permanent loss of hand function [8, 20].

However, there are very few data in the literature describing ENG exploration of CTS in MPS children. Here we present a retrospective series of 13 children with MPS I and MPS II. We describe the severity of median nerve damage and the ENG evolution of CTS in these children. We also give recommendations for timely ENG screening and follow-up to guide the decision for surgical decompression.

Materials and methods

Patients

We retrospectively studied a series of 13 children with enzymatic or molecular confirmed MPS I or II, referred to the Reference Center for Lysosomal Diseases and who underwent ENG evaluations in the Laboratory of the Trousseau hospital in Paris, France, between 1996 and 2011.

The following information was collected from medical and clinical records: birth history, clinical signs and symptoms, age at MPS diagnosis, age at CTS symptoms onset, and therapies received (ERT or surgical decompression).

This retrospective study was a review of clinical and ENG data and did not require Ethics Committee approval according to French regulations. The parents of all the children gave their consent for the medical records to be used and all data processing was carried out in compliance with the French Information Technology and Privacy Law.

Electroneurography evaluation

ENG evaluations were performed according to the Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) guidelines prepared by the Société de Neurophysiologie Clinique de Langue Française [21] using a Viking (Nicolet) until 2005, Spirit (Nicolet) until 2007 and a Viasys (FMB) thereafter. ENG studies were performed by the electrophysiologist and pediatric neurologist and the results interpreted blindly by the investigator before being collated with respective clinical chart review data. Age-adjusted normal calculation tables for the median and ulnar nerves as established by Mayer and Raimbault respectively were referenced to account for the degree of myelination at young ages [22]. Reference tables were required because nerve conduction velocity varies with age due to myelin maturation and latencies vary with the child’s stature.

Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were done bilaterally using surface recordings and stimulations while maintaining skin temperature of the patients above 32 °C. It should be noted that examination conditions are often very difficult, especially in a frightened and agitated child who cannot express himself orally. These examinations require great patience and at the same time should be rapidly executed. The child lay on the knees of his parent without restraints. For the duration of each evaluation, the child was comforted by explaining each manipulation and each electrical stimulation.

Recorded and calculated parameters

Motor nerve conduction

Median and ulnar motor nerves were stimulated at the wrist and at the elbow using bipolar surface electrodes. The stimulation was characterized by duration of 0.10 milliseconds and supramaximal intensity. Responses were collected downstream at the abductor pollicis brevis and adductor digiti minimi for stimulation of the median and ulnar nerves respectively.

For both the median and ulnar nerves, distal and proximal motor nerve measurements (Amplitude CMAPd,p in millivolts, and Latency MDL in milliseconds) were recorded in response to stimulations at the wrist and elbow respectively. The motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) was calculated along this segment for both median and ulnar nerves (m/sec). Distal MNCV for both median and ulnar nerves was calculated as distal distance/distal latency, along the segment between the point of stimulation and that of recording. It should be noted that MNCVd does not cover a homogeneous area (terminal nerve endings and neuromuscular junction). However, it is interesting to monitor as it represents distal conductivity independent of the variability related to the length of the hand and the height of the stimulation point at the wrist.

Sensory nerve conduction

The sensory nerve was stimulated orthodromically using two circular electrodes placed around the 2nd and 3rd fingers (for the median nerve) or around the 4th and 5th fingers (for the ulnar nerve), the active electrode (cathode) proximal to the wrist. Responses were collected distally and proximally on the corresponding nerve using surface electrodes at the wrist and elbow on the locations marked during the motor nerve conduction test. Each stimulation lasted 0.20 milliseconds. Between 10 and 50 evoked potentials were averaged to reliably confirm the presence or absence of a reading and to distinguish the response from background noise.

For both the median and ulnar nerves, distal and proximal sensory nerve measurements (latency SDL in milliseconds and amplitude of response SEPAd,p in microvolts), were recorded after each stimulus. The velocity of sensory nerve conduction SNCV was calculated as distance over time of conduction (m/sec). The distal sensory velocities (SNCV) were calculated as mentioned above.

Severity index

The following grading scheme for the severity of CTS by EDX criteria [23] was applied after each examination:
  • Mild CTS—prolonged median SDL ± SEPA below the lower limit of normal (LLN).

  • Moderate CTS— prolonged median SDL and prolongation of median MDL

  • Severe CTS—prolonged median MDL and SDL, with either an absent or low SEPA or a diminution of CMAP.

Results

Patients

This series consisted of 13 children born between 1994 and 2005 (Table 1): 10 boys had Hunter, one boy had Hurler-Scheie, one boy and one girl had Hurler syndrome. Ten children presented with motor hyperactivity and severe cognitive deficit, with lack of language skills. One of the Hurler patients had moderate psychomotor delays at the time of diagnosis (18 months). The child with attenuated Hunter and the child with Hurler-Scheie had learning difficulties without behavioral problems.
Table 1

Electroneurography examination results

Case

Gender

Diagnosis

age at CTS surgery (months)

age at ERT (months)

Age at ENG (months)

Distal Motor Latency MNL (msec)

Distal Sensory Latency SNL (msec)

Distal Motor Amplitude CMAP (mVlt)

Distal Sensory Amplitude SEPA (μVlt)

right

left

right

left

right

left

right

left

N°1

M

Hunter

84

125

55

3.8 (+2.5 SD)

4.2 (+3 SD)

2.6 (+2 SD)

3.6 (+4 SD)

3.7 (77%)

3.0 (62%)

9.4 (47%)

8.7 (43%)

     

70

4.7 (+3.5 SD)

5.8 (+6 SD)

3.2 (+3 SD)

absent

0.6 (12%)

1.1 (23%)

9.5 (47%)

absent

     

79

4.5 (+3 SD)

6.6 (+7 SD)

2.7 (+2 SD)

absent

8.8 (183%)

6.2 (125%)

5.0 (22%)

absent

N°2

M

Hunter

141

145

146

5.0 (+3 SD)

3.5 (0 SD)

3.0 (+2 SD)

2.5 (0 SD)

NA

NA

NA

4.1 (0%)

     

179

2.3 (-1 SD)

3.5 (+0.8 SD)

absent

absent

3.1 (76%)

3.2 (77% )

absent

absent

N°3

M

Hunter

136

141

142

6.7 (+6 SD)

6.0 (+5 SD)

3.7 (+4 SD)

3.2 (+4 SD)

4.5 (110%)

4.5 (110%)

4.7 (31%)

8.3 (56%)

     

167

4.1 (+1.5 SD)

3.7 (+1 SD)

2.8 (+1.5 SD)

2.5 (+0.5 SD)

3.8 (93% )

3.9 (95%)

11.0 (74%)

23.3 (156%)

N°4

M

Hunter

78

35

31

normal

normal

normal

normal

normal

normal

normal

normal

     

57

3.0 (+1 SD)

4.8 (+5 SD)

3.2 (+3 SD)

3.4 (+3.5 SD)

3.8 (80%)

5.3 (110%)

13.3 (66%)

14.0 (70%)

N°5

M

Hunter

78

109

69

13.2 (+18 SD)

10.0 (+13 SD)

absent

absent

0.6 (13%)

0.6 (15%)

absent

absent

     

76

11.0 (+14 SD)

10.7 (+14 SD)

absent

absent

0.7 (14%)

0.2 (4%)

absent

absent

     

102

5.3 (+3 SD)

3.7 (+1 SD)

4.2 (+7 SD)

3.8 (+6 SD)

2.5 (73%)

5.6 (164%)

4.9 (38%)

5.0 (38%)

N°6

M

Hunter

120

129

134

3.0 (0 SD)

4.0 (+1.5 SD)

3.4 (+3 SD)

3.12 (+2.5 SD)

4.9 (120%)

4.8 (117%)

1.9 (12%)

19.6 (130%)

N°7

M

Hunter

 

68

115

4.5 (+2 SD)

4.3 (+2 SD)

3.3 (+4 SD)

3.3 (+4 SD)

8.3 (265%)

2.5 (74%)

8.5 (65%)

5.0 (38%)

N°8

M

Hunter

  

72

3.7 (+3 SD)

3.5 (+2.5 SD)

absent

absent

0.6 (15%)

4.4 (110%)

absent

absent

N°9

M

Hunter

  

44

5.4 (+5 SD)

4.7 (+4 SD)

3.8 (+5 SD)

3.0 (+1 SD)

1.9 (48%)

0.5 (13%)

10.6 (53%)

8.4 (42%)

N°10

M

Hunter

53

 

43

4.2 (+3 SD)

4.9 (+7 SD)

2.4 (+1 SD)

3.8 (+5 SD)

4.3 (107%)

2.5 (62%)

25.0 (120%)

17.1 (85%)

N°11

M

Hurler

  

56

5.1 (+4.5 SD)

4.1 (+3 SD)

4.1 (+5 SD)

2.5 (+1.5 SD)

1.0 (20%)

2.9 (60%)

3.7 (18%)

12.8 (65%)

N°12

F

Hurler

 

12

18

2.4 (0 SD)

2.2 (0 SD)

128.0 (-2 SD)

1.1 (-2 SD)

7.2 (185%)

4.8 (125%)

29.6 (116%)

42.6 (167%)

N°13

M

Hurler-Sheie

74

93

51

2.5 (0 SD)

ND

absent

ND

5.2 (108%)

ND

absent

ND

     

64

2.0 (+0.5 SD)

2.2 (0 SD)

absent

absent

2.3 (49%)

4.6 (95% )

absent

absent

     

176

4.5 (+ 2.5 SD)

3.6 (+1 SD)

absent

absent

2.1 (51%)

5.9 (144%)

absent

absent

CTS carpal tunnel syndrome, ND not done, NA not available, ERT Enzyme Replacement Therapy, ENG electroneurography evaluation, SD standard deviation, % percent of lower limit of normal (LLN)

The average age at MPS diagnosis was 33.6 months (11–66 months). The average age at the first ENG evaluation was 6.25 years (median 56 months; 31–146). CTS symptoms onset dates (available for 5 cases) appeared on average at 78 months of age (43–109 months). Predominant symptoms reported by the parents were agitation and pain; withdrawing hands, crying when touched, or waking up during the night with hands rubbing against each other. Parents also reported increased difficulty with fine motor skills; inability to self-feed, hold a pencil, and difficulty manipulating a game remote. On first presentation, we noted the claw-like appearance of all the hands and stiffness of the fingers, which are very early symptoms preceding those of CTS.

A total of eight children underwent decompression surgery at an average age of 95.5 months (7.95 years). Six of these children had already received ERT and one received ERT just following surgery.

Nine children had received ERT at an average age of 7.9 years (12–145 months), two of whom did not have surgery (aged 12 and 68 months). Clinical improvement following infiltration was evidenced by finer hand features, increased joint flexibility and hand functionality.

Electroneurography evaluation

All 13 children underwent bilateral sensory and motor ENG evaluations, generating 43 hand ENG recordings (Table 1). In one child it was not possible to get bilateral ENG recordings on the first ENG visit (#13a). Only one child had complementary needle electromyography, with normal results.

Two children had normal ENG results on their first exam and were clinically asymptomatic (# 3,4). Eleven other children showed ENG anomalies straight away on at least one hand, four of whom were clinically asymptomatic.

Steven’s severity grading scheme was applied to each of the 43 hand ENGs. A total of 15 exams were indicative of severe compression of the median nerve; 10 with moderate severity; 8 with minor severity; 10 were normal. For all exams with minor severity, we measured a prolonged SDL of + 3.5 SD to +7SD associated with decreased SEPAd of 18% to 85% of LLN. For these with moderate severity, SDL was prolonged of + 2SD to +6SD associated with decreased SEPAd of 22% to 66% of LLN, and MDL were prolonged + 2SD to +7DS.

Severe compression was marked by an absence of both SDL and SEPAd. MDL were prolonged +2.5SD to +18SD in 10 exams and normal in the rest. Distal CMAP was > 95% of LLN in 5 of the exams and < 100% (4–77%) of LLN in the rest.

Early signs of CTS were expressed first on sensory then progressively on both motor and sensory median nerve pathways. When both pathways were affected, the impact was more pronounced on the sensory as seen in 9 of 13 cases (#1–3, 5–8, 10, 13). The anomaly was generally bilateral, though in one patient the pathology was expressed predominantly on one side (#2).

Proximal MNCV were measured for 10 patients and were in the normal range bilaterally for 9 patients (#2–4, 6, 7, 9, 11–13). Amplitude ratios (proximal over distal) did not decrease. One patient (#5) had a particularly severe compression of the median nerve, with prolonged bilateral MDL (+14SD to +18SD), significantly reduced amplitudes (13% to 15% of LLN), and unsynchronized muscle responses. This was the only patient to display a discrete slowing of MNCV (+3SD and + 4SD) which probably indicates a retrograde degeneration of the nerve fibers that is inevitable in view of the severity of compression in the canal.

Index of terminal latency (ITL) is the ratio of MNCVd to MNCVp. The ITL adjusts the median motor distal latency for the terminal conduction distance and the proximal nerve conduction velocity.

The relationship between distal latencies, conduction velocities MNCV and ITL in 41 hand ENG evaluations is presented in Table 2. In all recordings where MDL was greater than 2SD there was a corresponding MNCVd < 13 m/s and when MNCVp was measured, ITL < 0.26 on 14 hand ENG evaluations. Likewise, when MDL was less than 2SD, there was a corresponding MNCVd > 14 m/s and ITL > 0.26.
Table 2

Relationship between the standard deviation (SD) of Motor Nerve Distal Latency (MNLd) and Index of Terminal latency (ITL) in 13 cases and 41 hand ENG evaluations

SD ¥ of MNL d

MNCV p (m/s)

MNCV d (m/s)

ITL

Case

Hand

0.0

55.0 (-0.5 SD)

20

0.36

6

Right

0.0

51.0 (+0.5 SD)

17

0.33

12

Right

0.0

53.0 (0 SD)

18

0.36

13a

Right

0.0

43.0 (-0.5 SD)

17

0.40

12

Left

0.0

ND

18

 

2a

Left

0.5

ND

25

 

13b

Right

0.5

ND

23

 

13b

Left

0.8

47.9 (-2 SD)

18

0.38

2b

Left

1.0

58.2 (0 SD)

29

0.50

2b

Right

1.0

54.3 (-0.5 SD)

17

0.31

4

Right

1.0

56.5 (0 SD)

16

0.28

3b

Left

1.0

46.9 (-2 SD)

15

0.32

5c

Left

1.0

52.0 (-1 SD)

17

0.33

13c

Left

1.5

55.9 (-0.5 SD)

15

0.27

3b

Right

1.5

55.0 (-0.5 SD)

16

0.29

6

Left

2.0

47.2 (-2 SD)

11

0.23

7

Left

2.0

50.7 (-1 SD)

13

0.26

7

Left

2.5

ND

11

 

8

Left

2.5

ND

13

 

1a

Right

2.5

60.0 (0 SD)

13

0.21

13c

Right

3.0

ND

11

 

8

Right

3.0

ND

12

 

1c

Right

3.0

ND

13

 

2a

Right

3.0

49.7 (-2 SD)

10

0.20

5c

Right

3.0

ND

12

 

10

Right

3.0

ND

13

 

1a

Left

3.0

59.0 (0 SD)

13

0.22

11

Left

3.5

ND

12

 

1b

Right

4.0

57.0 (0 SD)

12

0.20

9

Left

4.5

54.0 (0 SD)

8

0.15

11

Right

5.0

56.0 (0 SD)

8

0.14

9

Right

5.0

ND

6

 

3a

Left

5.0

45.0 (-2.5 SD)

11

0.24

4

Left

6.0

50.0 (-2 SD)

6

0.12

3a

Right

6.0

ND

6

 

1b

Left

7.0

ND

7

 

1c

Left

7.0

ND

10.2

 

10

Left

13.0

25.0 (-4 SD)

4

0.16

5a

Left

14.0

43.0 (-1 SD)

4.5

0.10

5b

Right

14.0

33.0 (-3 SD)

4.5

0.14

5b

Left

18.0

28.5 (-3 SD)

4

0.14

5a

Right

SD Standard deviation, SD¥ Standard deviation of Distal Motor latency, MNCVp,d Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity; distal, proximal, ND not done, Left Left arm, Right Right arm

a: 1st evaluation; b: 2nd evaluation; c: 3rd evaluation

Discussion

This retrospective study of 13 children with MPS highlights the advantages of early ENG evaluation to detect CTS, although the low number of patients appears as a limitation of the study.

ENG anomalies appeared as early as 3 years and 7 months in the youngest child, whereas the average age of clinical symptoms was 6 years in our series, corroborating what has been previously reported [4]. ENG anomalies preceded clinical signs of CTS which were reported on average 44.6 months after the diagnosis of MPS in four of our patients. Thomas et al. [24] note that CTS is commonly reported during adolescence in attenuated MPS I. Given the much earlier onset of ENG anomalies, CTS diagnosis during adolescence is too late [8, 10, 15, 25].

Ulnar ENG evaluation showed no compression in the Guyon canal in any of the children. The integrity of median and ulnar nerves in the forearm, furthermore, normal tibial and fibular nerve conduction evaluations demonstrating absence of Tarsal Canal Syndrome, confirm absence of diffuse neuropathy. Therefore, we present findings of true median nerve compression with damage in the distal portion of the nerve, initially on the sensory pathway then becoming motor-sensory. This anomaly presented bilaterally, however the degree of severity was often asymmetrical. These findings are in accordance with classic ENG responses seen in adults with CTS [26].

Using Steven’s severity grade [23], 15 of the exams showed severe compression, 10 moderate and 8 minor.

Prolonged sensory and motor LDs are the hallmark of distal demyelination [26]. A prolonged LD (greater than 2SD) followed by diminished amplitudes, either sensory or motor, indicates a more pronounced stage of compression and is reflective of axonal distress [27]. We noted an interesting relationship between distal MLD, MNCV and ITL values (MNCVd / MNCVp). This ratio decreases as conduction time increases across the carpal tunnel, highlighting the slowing of distal conduction as compared to proximal [28]. In this study we have demonstrated that below a threshold of 14 m/s MNCVd and ILT of 0.26 there is a true distal conduction slowdown. Threrefore it is important to study MNCVp and MNCVd bilaterally, even if this means a doubling of examination time. Due to lack of longitudinal data, we could not confirm a correlation between severity and age as is noted in the literature [29]. However, cross-sectionally we note that anomalies of the motor and sensory LD, amplitude and velocities are more pronounced in older age groups.

In our study, two of the children had diminished distal amplitudes in isolation; the amplitude measured at the elbow was normal. Sensory deterioration can remain severe from an electrical standpoint, as shown by the absence of sensory potentials. Infiltration at the wrist most likely renders measuring sensory responses difficult, causing decreased amplitudes without compression or axonal lesions [6, 7].

ERT is known to improve walking ability and respiration and enhances quality of life [30], and has been available in Europe for MPS I since 2003 and for MPS II since 2007 [14, 30]. However, there has been no observed correlation between ERT and improvements in CTS; many children have required surgical intervention despite ERT treatment [13, 15]. In our study, two children received ERT without surgical intervention, in one the child was very young (18 months) and was clinically asymptomatic and showed no electrical anomalies. The second child developed CTS despite four years of ERT.

Eight of the children in our series underwent a surgical intervention. The clinical follow-up in all these children was favorable, with increased comfort, absence of pain, increased joint flexibility, and consequent improvement in hand functionality. Despite the clinical improvements, two of the patients continued to show severe median, and essentially sensory nerve conduction abnormalities on ENG evaluations post-ERT and post-surgical treatment, most likely reflecting persistent technical challenges in obtaining results after infiltration [6, 7]. Five of the children had an ENG evaluation follow-up post-surgery, results of which showed marginal changes. However, three of these children had had ENG evaluations prior to surgery, and comparison of the pre- and post-surgical ENG evaluations showed marked improvements [8].

Conclusions

In conclusion, in children with severe or attenuated MPS, the diagnosis of median nerve damage remains a challenge, especially since clinical symptoms are often non-specific, subtle or latent. Nonetheless, all patients with median nerve compression present with abnormal ENG recordings even in absence of clinical symptoms. ENG constitutes a powerful technique for detecting the initial signs of median nerve compression before the onset of symptoms by which time decompression surgery is less effective and there is a risk of axonal damage. To prevent or minimize irreversible sequelae of median nerve compression, we suggest annual electroneurography testing for mucopolysaccharidoses patients starting as early as 3 years of age, including both motor and sensory nerve pathways, on median and, in reference to the ulnar nerves, bilaterally at the wrist and the elbow. Furthermore, it is critical to calculate the ITL as it represents a sensitive index of distal velocity and serves to confirm any slight slowing in distal nerve conduction, given that the patient serves as his own control. We suggest using the threshold algorithm (ITL > 0.26) as a quick and simple means of detecting median nerve distal compression early on.

Timely surgical intervention can greatly improve the overall function and quality of life of these patients. It should be noted that some patients have no or minimal benefit following surgery and enzyme therapy and that carpal tunnel syndrome may occur despite enzyme replacement therapy: continued monitoring is therefore essential.

Abbreviations

CMAPd,p

Compound Muscle Action Potential; distal, proximal

ENG: 

Electroneurography

ITL: 

Index of Terminal Latency

LLN: 

Lower limit of normal

MDL: 

Motor Distal Latency

MNCVd,p

Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity; distal, proximal

NCS: 

Nerve Conduction Study

SDL: 

Sensory Distal Latency

SEPAd,p

Sensory Evoked Potential Amplitude; distal, proximal

SNCVd,p

Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity; distal, proximal

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Sharmeen Gettner at Matrix Consultants provided medical writing support in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for the conduct of this study. Medical writing support in the preparation of this manuscript (provided by Sharmeen Gettner at Matrix Consultants) were paid for by Sanofi-Genzyme.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

KM, BH and MM conceived the study, participated in its design and drafted the manuscript. KM and MM carried out electromyographic explorations. All authors participated have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was strictly observational and retrospective. It was conducted in compliance with the French regulations. As the Electroneurography procedure is already approved for clinical use at the authors’ institution, this study did not require Ethics Committee approval.

The parents of all the children gave their consent for the medical records to be used and all data processing was carried out in compliance with the French Information Technology and Privacy Law.

Consent for publication

As details on individuals reported within the manuscript are entirely unidentifiable, consent for publication in OJRD was not requested from parents.

Competing interests

BH has received travel expenses, and been invited to meetings funded and organized by Biomarin, Genzyme Corporation and Shire HGT. KM, MM and TB declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hospital for Pediatrics and Reeducation, Bullion, 78830, France
(2)
Department of Pediatric Neurology, CHU Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France
(3)
Reference Center for Lysosomal Diseases, CHU Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France
(4)
Reference Center for Neuromuscular diseases, CHU Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France
(5)
Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, CHU Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France

References

  1. Albano LM, Sugayama SS, Bertola DR, Andrade CE, Utagawa CY, Puppi F, Nader HB, Toma L, Coelho J, Leistner S, et al. Clinical and laboratorial study of 19 cases of mucopolysaccharidoses. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2000;55:213–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Baehner F, Schmiedeskamp C, Krummenauer F, Miebach E, Bajbouj M, Whybra C, Kohlschütter A, Kampmann C, Beck M. Cumulative incidence rates of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Germany. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28:1011–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Martin R, Beck M, Eng C, Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Muñoz V, Muenzer J. Recognition and diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis II (hunter syndrome). Pediatrics. 2008;121:e377–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yuen A, Dowling G, Johnstone B, Kornberg A, Coombs C. Carpal tunnel syndrome in children with mucopolysaccharidoses. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:260–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. White KK. Orthopaedic aspects of mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology. 2011;50:26–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wraith JE, Alani SM. Carpal tunnel syndrome in the mucopolysaccharidoses and related disorders. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:962–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Al Sawaf S, Mayatepek E, Hoffmann B. Neurologic findings in hunter disease: pathology and possible therapeutic effects reviewed. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31:473–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Haddad FS, Jones DH, Vellodi A, Kane N, Pitt MC. Carpal tunnel syndrome in the mucopolysaccharidoses and mucolipidoses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:576–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Norman-Taylor F, Fixsen JA, Sharrard WJ. Hunter’s syndrome as a cause of childhood carpal tunnel syndrome: a report of three cases. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:106–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Heest AE, House J, Krivit W, Walker K. Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger digits in children with mucopolysaccharide storage disorders. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:236–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Miebach E. Management of infusion-related reactions to enzyme replacement therapy in a cohort of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis disorders. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;47(1):100–6.Google Scholar
  12. Muenzer J. Early initiation of enzyme replacement therapy for the mucopolysaccharidoses. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;111:63–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Parini M, Rigoldi M, Tedesco L, Boffi L, Brambilla A, Bertoletti S, Boncimino A, Del Longo A, De Lorenzo P, Gaini R, et al. Enzymatic replacement therapy for hunter disease: up to 9 years experience with 17 patients. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2015;3:65–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Scarpa M, Almássy Z, Beck M, Bodamer O, Bruce IA, De Meirleir L, Guffon N, Guillén-Navarro E, Hensman P, Jones S, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II: European recommendations for the diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of a rare disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Khanna G, Van Heest AE, Agel J, Bjoraker K, Grewal S, Abel S, Krivit W, Peters C, Orchard PJ. Analysis of factors affecting development of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with hurler syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39:331–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bahadir C, Kurtulus D, Cihandide E. Mucopolysaccharidosis type-IS presenting with onset of carpal tunnel syndrome at adolescence. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009;15:402–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanaan N, Sawaya RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome: modern diagnostic and management techniques. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:311–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1373–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Valayannopoulos V, Wijburg FA. Therapy for the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology. 2011;50:49–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Neufeld E, Muenzer J. The mucopolysaccharidoses. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, editors. The metabolic and molecular basis of inherited disease. Volume III. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 3421–52.Google Scholar
  21. Fournier E. Examen électromyographique et étude de la conduction nerveuse-sémiologie électrophysiologique. Paris: Editions techniques et documentation Lavoisier; 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Raimbault J. Les conductions nerveuses chez l'enfant normal. Paris: Expansion Scientifique Française; 1988.Google Scholar
  23. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph # 26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:1477–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas JA, Beck M, Clarke JT, Cox GF. Childhood onset of Scheie syndrome, the attenuated form of mucopolysaccharidosis I. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33:421–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Holt JB, Van Heest AE, Shah AS. Hand disorders in children with mucopolysaccharide storage diseases. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:2263–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis L, Vedanarayanan VV. Carpal tunnel syndrome in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;50:57–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Seror P. The axonal carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101:197–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Fournier E. Examen électromyographique : Sémiologie électrophysiologique des nerfs et des muscles. 2nd ed. Editions Médicales Internationales: Cachan (France); 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Kwon J-Y, Ko K, Sohn YB, Kim SJ, Park SW, Kim SH, Cho SY, Jin DK. High prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (hunter syndrome). Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155:1329–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Muenzer J, Beck M, Eng CM, Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Martin R, Ramaswami U, Vellodi A, Wraith JE, Cleary M, et al. Long-term, open-labeled extension study of idursulfase in the treatment of hunter syndrome. Genet Med. 2011;13:95–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement