- Position statement
- Open Access
International physician survey on management of FOP: a modified Delphi study
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseasesvolume 12, Article number: 110 (2017)
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), a disabling disorder of progressive heterotopic ossification (HEO), is caused by heterozygous gain-of- function mutations in Activin receptor A, type I (ACVR1, also known as ALK2), a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor. Presently, symptomatic management is possible, but no definitive treatments are available. Although extensive guidelines for symptomatic management are widely used, regional preferences exist. In order to understand if there was worldwide consensus among clinicians treating FOP patients, an expert panel of physicians directly involved in FOP patient care was convened. Using a modified Delphi method, broad international consensus was reached on four main topics: diagnosis, prevention of flare-ups, patient and family-centered care and general clinical management issues. This study of physician preferences provides a basis for standardization of clinical management for FOP.
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP; MIM #135100) is a rare and disabling genetic condition of progressive heterotopic ossification with a point prevalence of approximately 1 per 2 million. No ethnic, racial, gender or geographic predisposition has been reported [1, 2]. FOP results from mutations in the intracellular domain of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor, ACVR1, which drive extraskeletal bone formation [3,4,5]. Mutant (mt) ACVR1 exhibits mild basal hyperactivity and hyper-responsiveness to canonical and non-canonical ligands [6,7,8].
Classic FOP, seen in ~97% of patients worldwide is characterized by two clinical features: malformations of the great toes and progressive heterotopic endochondral ossification (HEO), and by a single missense activating mutation in ACVR1 (c.617G > A;R206H) [1,2,3,4]. Misdiagnosis is common . Clinical and genetic variants have been described [2, 4]. Malformations of the great toe are noted at birth; neck stiffness due to orthotopic fusion of cervical vertebra is a common early finding. Other skeletal anomalies associated with FOP include short malformed thumbs, clinodactyly, short broad femoral necks, hip dysplasia and proximal medial tibial osteochondromas .
Most individuals with classic FOP experience episodes of painful inflammation of soft tissues (flare-up), followed by heterotopic ossification of skeletal muscle, fascia, tendons, aponeuroses, and ligaments beginning in the first decade of life. Progressive joint dysfunction without flare-up can also occur, with or without HEO. Extraskeletal bone formation is permanent and leads to progressive immobility and need for assistance in performing activities of daily living . Finally, progressive restrictive chest wall disease and secondary cardiac failure lead to death, commonly in the fifth decade . At present, no definitive treatment is available; symptomatic management prevails but varies widely . Basic and clinical research is identifying robust targets for clinical development [1, 7, 8, 13,14,15,16].
In order to better understand if there is worldwide consensus among clinicians in FOP patient care, an expert panel of physicians directly involved in patient management was convened at an international FOP patient meeting to address this issue.
The consensus process incorporated a five-step modified Delphi method, which took place between January and June 2016 . First, a thorough review of the literature and FOP Treatment Guidelines was performed by the principal investigator (PI; MDR). Second, an e-mail questionnaire, with a comprehensive list of statements related to four main topics (diagnosis, prevention of flare-ups, patient and family-centered care and general clinical management issues) was established by the PI. Third, a panel of ten international experts was convened by the PI based on physician participation at the annual FOP patient and family meeting of FOP Italia in Livorno, Italy in April, 2016. The panel included physicians from ten countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the United States) and from five continents (North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Australia). Fourth, the expert panel was asked to rank, revise and order statements for consideration. Finally, the panel was asked to indicate agreement, partial agreement or disagreement with specific statements agreed upon for assessment.
Twenty statements considered by the expert panel received at least consensus approval and are reported in Table 1.
There was general agreement on the need for genetic diagnosis in FOP. However, one expert strongly disagreed and stated “the diagnosis of FOP is clinical.” Other experts agreed conceptually on the need for genetic diagnosis but deferred on practical grounds because genetic analysis was not available in their countries. Most agreed that even if the diagnosis of FOP was clinically certain, genetic confirmation was desirable due to possible phenocopies. All agreed that genetic diagnosis was essential for patients with toe malformation without HEO, in order to exclude those with toe malformations who did not have FOP. All experts agreed that an international effort by the FOP community should ensure genetic testing be available to all individuals who are clinically suspected of having FOP even if they live in countries where no genetic analysis of ACVR1 is available.
Prevention of flare-ups
All experts agreed that blunt muscle trauma, muscle fatigue, or stretching of the joints or soft tissues should be avoided for fear of triggering flare-ups. Activities with a high risk of injury or falling, such as running, bicycling, or contact sports should also be avoided to the extent possible, but within the developmental norms for a patient’s age group (i.e., children should be allowed to achieve their developmental milestones that involve playing). Individualized lifestyle plans to avoid trauma should be considered for each patient, based on age, limited mobility and cultural norms.
In case of clinically significant impact injuries, early administration of oral prednisone may be useful to prevent flare-ups. Despite lack of stringent clinical evidence, the experts agreed that a brief (3–4 day) course of oral corticosteroids (i.e. prednisone at 2 mg/kg/day), started within the first 24 h after major trauma had a plausible preventive effect [10, 12]. Due to the fact that major dental work or surgery is a high-risk trigger for flare-ups, a course of oral steroids before and after major dental work or surgery could have a positive preventive effect [10, 12].
All experts agreed that intramuscular injections are dangerous for FOP patients because they may trigger a flare-up and heterotopic ossification at the injection site. To prevent flare-ups, subcutaneous immunization for vaccines that can be administrated by the subcutaneous route is advisable; for all the other vaccines, the risk–benefit ratio of intramuscular administration should be discussed with patients and parents or families. All experts agreed that no immunization should be administered during a flare-up .
There was general disagreement about chronic treatment with existing medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce flare-ups. No adequate data exist in FOP animal models or in clinical studies. However, physician discretion in using medications to control disease symptoms in individual patients is advised, as indicated in the FOP Treatment Guidelines .
Patient and family-centered care
The panel of experts agreed with the over-arching goal of patient and family-centered care. Patient and family knowledge, values, beliefs and cultural backgrounds should be incorporated into the planning and delivery of care of FOP patients, as with any patient. The physician should communicate and share complete and unbiased information with patients and families in ways that are affirming and useful and in order to allow the patient to effectively participate in the decision-making process.
As with any rare disease, a multidisciplinary approach to comprehensive medical care and social support by different specialists is advisable. However, each patient should seek and establish a primary physician to coordinate all care. The panel of experts agreed that at least one national or regional center with medical, surgical, anesthesia, physical therapy, occupational therapy and dental expertise in FOP should be identified to optimize care for FOP patients and to minimize risks from any needed medical care and procedures. For continuity of care, knowledge and information concerning the patient specifically and FOP in general should be immediately available to the family doctor as well as to other locally-treating physicians. An emergency card provided to the patient and/or the family is useful in order to summarize FOP-specific issues/concerns.
At the time of diagnosis, patients and families should be informed about the International FOP Association (IFOPA - the primary portal for announcing FOP related clinical trials http://www.ifopa.org) as well as country-specific and language-specific FOP organizations. This recommendation is critical for providing patient and family support resources and for facilitating access to a network of patients and providers familiar with FOP.
General clinical management issues
Annual clinical assessment of infants, children and adults with FOP is preferable but not always achievable. Dental prophylaxis and routine follow-up should begin as early as possible. The education of patients and their families on safe dental care and prophylaxis is essential, especially during childhood years, focusing on hygiene and prevention of caries. Details concerning oral care are available in the FOP Treatment Guidelines .
The expert panel reached consensus about major dental procedures (routine extraction of wisdom teeth, root canal, etc.) which should be avoided. Mandibular blocks must be avoided due to the risk of HEO and temporo-mandibular joint ankylosis. Routine dental procedures (cleaning, carrie fillings) should proceed with caution. In case of locked jaw, the consultation of a dietician to ensure adequate nutrition is desirable.
In case of procedures requiring general anesthesia, overstretching of the temporal-mandibular joint must be avoided. Most FOP patients have fusion of cervical vertebrae, limited mouth opening or ankylosis of the temporal-mandibular joint, making oral intubation impossible. In these cases, naso-tracheal fiberoptic intubation is preferred. In patients who retain mouth opening, overstretching of the temporal-mandibular joint can cause flare-ups and ossification; therefore even in these patients awake, naso-tracheal fiberoptic intubation is preferred. An anesthesiologist highly experienced with general anesthesia for FOP patients must be consulted pre-operatively and an experienced otolaryngologist must be available in case tracheostomy is necessary prior to fiberoptic intubation. The positioning of the patient must be meticulous and the use of an air warming blanket or a padded transfer mattress is to be considered in order to minimize soft tissue trauma [12, 18].
Pulmonary function evaluation should begin after 6 years of age, if possible. The Expert Panel does not recommend routine radiographic follow-up due to the unjustified radiation risk-benefit ratio.
Approximately 50% of FOP patients develop hearing impairment during childhood. Audiometry should be considered if clinically warranted. In case of hearing loss that interferes with learning or activities of daily living, the use of hearing aids should be considered .
In order to prevent or delay the onset of muscle atrophy secondary to mobility limitations, light physical activity without risk of muscle trauma or stretching (e.g., swimming), that allows patients to perform active range of motion exercise in a safe, low-impact environment, is recommended. Traditional physiotherapy, including passive range of motion, should be avoided, due to the risk of over-stretching and soft tissue injuries. Nevertheless, diaphragmatic breathing exercises and postural re-education can be performed when possible, in order to maintain and improve respiratory function, especially in older patients in whom chest wall dynamics is severely compromised .
Occupational therapy, focused on enhancing activities of daily living, may be useful to improve the quality of life of FOP patients. In addition, the goals of physical therapy and any adaptive prosthetics should be clearly focused on patient comfort, rather than trying to correct biomechanical or anatomic defects .
In patients with HO, the use of appropriate methods is recommended in order to reduce pressure over bony prominences. In patients with limited motion, frequent position changes are essential for preventing pressure sores. Other strategies include keeping the area clean in order to prevent infections, monitoring skin conditions and maintaining adequate nutrition .
The panel reached consensus that the identification of depression, anxiety or other emotional problems, as well as parenting stress and coping behaviors should prompt psychological and/or specialized social service support.
There was broad consensus on most of the statements considered by the panel (Table 1). However, there were some notable exceptions including – but not limited to – the chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications to prevent HEO. The expert panel agreed to disagree on this contentious issue but reached consensus on the need for additional evidence-based data.
There are many issues regarding the management of FOP that were not addressed in this research study. The exclusion of management issues related to FOP should not be construed as a failure to reach consensus. Many topics were beyond the scope of this ad hoc study.
First, the panel of experts assembled was limited to those attending the FOP Italia Patient and Family Meeting in Livorno, Italy in 2016 and did not necessarily reflect the totality of global expertise in this field. Second, the generation of topics for consideration focused primarily on prevention and purposely circumvented controversial topics of symptomatic management such as palliative medications. Third, the FOP Treatment Guidelines, a consensus document published by clinical experts worldwide, and whose revision is anticipated in 2018, will comprehensibly address the central management issues in FOP as it has in the past . Nevertheless, this survey will assist physicians in the contemporary clinical management of FOP patients, circumscribe critical areas of preventive management, and inform future consensus guidelines. Finally, the consensus statements reported in this study are not intended to substitute for the independent professional judgment of treating physicians as they cannot account for regional heterogeneity of access to clinical care or the best advice and guidance for individual FOP patients and families.
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive
Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ, Shore EM. From mysteries to medicines: drug development for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2013;1:637–49.
Hüning I, Gillessen-Kaesbach G. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: clinical course, genetic mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation. Mol Syndromol. 2014;5:201–11.
Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, Fenstermacher DA, Cho T-J, Choi IH, Connor JM, Delai P, Glaser DL, Le Merrer M, Morhart R, Rogers JG, Smith R, Triffitt JT, Urtizberea JA, Zasloff M, Brown MA, Kaplan FS. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2016;38:525–7.
Kaplan FS, Xu M, Seemann P, Connor JM, Glaser DL, Carroll L, Delai P, Fastnacht-Urban E, Forman SJ, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hoover-Fong J, Köster B, Pauli RM, Reardon W, Zaidi S-A, Zasloff M, Morhart R, Mundlos S, Groppe J, Shore EM. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:379–90.
Chakkalakal SA, Zhang D, Culbert AL, Convente MR, Caron RJ, Wright AC, Maidment AD, Kaplan FS, Shore EM. An Acvr1 R206H knock-in mouse has fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1746–56.
Shen Q, Little SC, Xu M, Haupt J, Ast C, Katagiri T, Mundlos S, Seemann P, Kaplan FS, Mullins MC, Shore EM. The fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva R206H ACVR1 mutation activates BMP-independent chondrogenesis and zebrafish embryo ventralization. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3462–72.
Hatsell SJ, Idone V, Wolken DM, Huang L, Kim HJ, Wang L, Wen X, Nannuru KC, Jimenez J, Xie L, Das N, Makhoul G, Chernomorsky R, D’Ambrosio D, Corpina RA, Schoenherr CJ, Feeley K, Yu PB, Yancopoulos GD, Murphy AJ, Economides AN. ACVR1(R206H) receptor mutation causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva by imparting responsiveness to activin A. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):ra137.
Hino K, Ikeya M, Horigome K, Matsumoto Y, Ebise H, Nishio M, Sekiguchi K, Shibata M, Nagata S, Matsuda S, Toguchida J. Neofunction of ACVR1 in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:15438–43.
Kitterman JA, Kantanie S, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. Iatrogenic harm caused by diagnostic errors in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):e654–61. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
Pignolo RJ, Bedford-Gay C, Liljesthrom M, Durbin-Johnson BP, Shore EM, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. The natural history of flare-ups in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a comprehensive global assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:650–6.
Kaplan FS, Zasloff MA, Kitterman JA, Shore EM, Hong CC, Rocke DM. Early mortality and cardiorespiratory failure in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:686–91.
Kaplan FS, Shore EM, Pignolo RJ, The International Clinical Consortium on FOP. The medical management of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: current treatment considerations. Clin Proc Intl Clin Consort FOP. 2011;4:1–100. Available from www.ifopa.org.
Hong CC, Yu PB. Applications of small molecule BMP inhibitors in physiology and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20:409–18.
Shimono K, Tung WE, Macolino C, Chi AH, Didizian JH, Mundy C, Chandraratna RA, Mishina Y, Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Pacifici M, Iwamoto M. Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-gamma agonists. Nat Med. 2011;17:454–60.
Chakkalakal SA, Uchibe K, Convente MR, Zhang D, Economides AN, Kaplan FS, Pacifici M, Iwamoto M, Shore EM. Palovarotene inhibits heterotopic ossification and maintains limb mobility and growth in mice with the human ACVR1 (R206H) fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1666–75.
Wang H, Lindborg C, Lounev V, Kim JH, McCarrick-Walmsley R, Xu M, Mangivani L, Groppe JC, Shore EM, Schipani E, Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ. Cellular hypoxia promotes heterotopic ossification by amplifying BMP signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1652–65.
Limestone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/delphibook.pdf. 2002
Kilmartin E, Grunwald Z, Kaplan FS, Nussbaum BL. General anesthesia for dental procedures in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a review of 42 cases in 30 patients. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:298–301.
Levy CE, Lash AT, Janoff HB, Kaplan FS. Conductive hearing loss in individuals with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Am J Audiol. 1999;8:29–33.
This work was supported in part by FOP Italia, the Giannina Gaslini Institute, the Center for Research in FOP and Related Disorders at The University of Pennsylvania and the Isaac and Rose Nassau Professorship of Orthopaedic Molecular Medicine (to FSK).
The consensus meeting was financially supported by FOP Italia.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
The study was conceived, designed and conducted by MDR. The survey data were generated by all of the authors. The paper was written by MDR & FSK. The paper was revised and approved by all of the authors.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.