Open Access

The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201611:135

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0516-x

Received: 19 May 2016

Accepted: 16 September 2016

Published: 6 October 2016

Abstract

Secreting pituitary adenomas that cause acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, as well as prolactinomas and thyrotroph adenomas, are uncommon, usually benign, slow-growing tumours. The rarity of these conditions means that their diagnosis is not familiar to most non-specialist physicians. Consequently, pituitary adenomas may be overlooked and remain untreated, and affected individuals may develop serious comorbidities that reduce their quality of life and life expectancy. Because many signs and symptoms of pituitary adenomas overlap with those of other, more common disorders, general practitioners and non-endocrinology specialists need to be aware of the “red flags” suggestive of these conditions. A long duration of active disease in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities and reduced quality of life. Appropriate treatment can lead to disease remission, and, although some symptoms may persist in some patients, treatment usually reduces the incidence and severity of comorbidities and improves quality of life. Therefore, correct, early diagnosis and characterization of a pituitary adenoma is crucial for patients, to trigger timely, appropriate treatment and to optimize outcome. This article provides an overview of the epidemiology of hormonal syndromes associated with pituitary adenomas, discusses the difficulties of and considerations for their diagnosis, and reviews the comorbidities that may develop, but can be prevented, by accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We hope this review will help general practitioners and non-endocrinology specialists to suspect secreting pituitary adenomas and refer patients to an endocrinologist for confirmation of the diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

Acromegaly Cushing’s disease Pituitary neoplasms Prolactinoma Hyperthyroidism Pituitary hormones

Background

Pituitary adenomas are usually benign, slow-growing tumours; those that secrete an active hormone are known as “hormonally active” or “functional tumours” and, unlike the so-called “non-functioning” pituitary adenomas, lead to diseases of excessive hormone secretion. The secreting pituitary adenomas include those that cause acromegaly and Cushing’s disease as well as prolactinomas and thyrotroph adenomas. Although gonadotroph adenomas may exceptionally trigger symptoms related to gonadotropin hypersecretion, they account for the vast majority of non-functioning pituitary adenomas and therefore will not be discussed in the present review [1, 2].

All types of pituitary adenomas may compress surrounding structures, primarily the normal pituitary gland and optic pathways, thus causing symptoms of hypopituitarism, headaches, and visual disturbance [3, 4]. Despite their benign nature, pituitary adenomas may invade the adjacent cavernous sinus, a feature making anatomical and histological invasion a key prognostic factor for these tumours [58] and a basis for their classification [9]. However, the present article will focus on the manifold consequences of pituitary hormone overproduction by the different types of hormonally active adenomas. Acromegaly is caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), which leads to increased levels of circulating insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [10], and Cushing’s disease arises from chronic hypercortisolism associated with oversecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) [11]. In patients with prolactinomas, excess prolactin can lead to gonadal dysfunction due to decreased levels of oestrogen in women and testosterone in men, and to oligo-amenorrhoea and galactorrhoea in premenopausal women. Prolactinomas in any adult patient can cause gonadal dysfunction and infertility. Finally, thyrotroph adenomas can lead to hyperthyroidism with inappropriately normal or increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels [4].

Secreting pituitary adenomas clearly meet the European definition of rare diseases, because they affect fewer than 1 in 2,000 individuals. Therefore most non-specialist physicians have limited experience of these conditions. In addition, many signs and symptoms overlap with those of other, more common, disorders and may be overlooked. General practitioners (GPs), to whom patients may present, and non-endocrinology specialists, to whom patients may be initially referred, therefore need to be aware of the “red flags” suggestive of a pituitary adenoma when making a diagnosis. Additionally, the techniques and assays used for biochemical diagnosis may present difficulties in routine use in the clinical setting. These factors combined mean that diagnosis of these disease states, particularly acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, may be delayed.

Generally, in patients with pituitary adenomas, a long duration of active disease is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities and decreased quality of life, so treatment should be started as soon as possible to prevent or at least limit deleterious effects of hormone excess. Compared with no treatment, appropriate treatment (surgical removal of the tumour and pharmacological management, if needed, followed by radiotherapy) can lead to disease remission, improved quality of life, decreased incidence and severity of comorbidities, and lower mortality [3, 4, 10, 12, 13]. A correct and early diagnosis is therefore crucial for patients, to trigger appropriately early treatment and to optimize outcomes.

To assist GPs and non-endocrinology specialists in recognizing and managing secreting pituitary adenomas, this review provides an overview of the epidemiology of these conditions, discusses the difficulties of their diagnosis, and examines associated comorbidities that may be prevented by accurate, early diagnosis, and appropriate treatment.

Difficulties with diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas and consequences of delayed diagnosis

Historically, secreting pituitary adenomas were considered to be particularly rare. In general, however, autopsy and radiological studies reveal pituitary adenomas in 15–20 % of normal subjects [14, 15]. As diagnostic techniques have progressed, in particular the availability of specific, sensitive biochemical assays, more accurate epidemiological data on these tumours are becoming available [1416].

Differential diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas is based on biochemical evaluation and imaging to assess the extent of hormone hypersecretion and to identify the location and size of tumours. Conditions associated with pituitary adenomas present in non-specific ways at an early stage, making diagnosis from clinical signs and symptoms at presentation challenging, and resulting in the possibility of diagnostic delay. Diagnosis may be further complicated and delayed by subclinical disease, the slow manifestation of symptoms in these chronic conditions, and the extensive overlap of signs and symptoms with those of other diseases [4, 13, 1719], as discussed below. Patients are often referred to a specialist because of a certain symptom (for instance to a dermatologist for purple striae, to a rheumatologist for joint pain, to a psychiatrist for mood changes, etc.), but the non-endocrinology specialist may not consider features beyond their specialty or be aware of a complete history of the disease, and this factor may also contribute to a delay in diagnosis of a secreting pituitary adenoma.

Because changes in appearance due to acromegaly and Cushing’s disease generally occur slowly, they are often overlooked by family members, friends, GPs, and the patients themselves. There is increasing support for the development of automated diagnostic tools that would potentially aid the diagnostic process, including face-recognition software to identify the characteristic physical changes associated with these conditions [2022], or 3-dimensional cephalometry [23]. However, such approaches have to date been applied only to limited numbers of subjects in pioneering studies.

The consequences of delayed diagnosis are an increased number and severity of complications, delayed intervention, a reduced quality of life for patients, and an increased risk of mortality. Therefore, early diagnosis is important. It allows timely intervention and the initiation of appropriate treatment, thus limiting the complications and sequelae of these conditions and allowing the possibility of remission in some cases. However, as pituitary disorders are rare and the costs of tests are relatively high, routine screening may be difficult to justify in many countries.

Finally, it must be kept in mind that pituitary adenomas may rarely be part of a type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN-1) syndrome that also includes primary hyperparathyroidism and gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours. In such a setting, overlooking a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma may be particularly harmful [24].

Acromegaly

The reported incidence of GH-secreting adenomas that cause acromegaly is 1–4 per million per year [2530], with a prevalence of 27–97 per million [2527, 3034]. However, these figures may be underestimates of the true number of patients with acromegaly, and some studies suggest that the condition is more common: an incidence of 11 cases per million per year was recently found from an analysis of a large US health-plan database [34], and a German study reported a prevalence of 1,034 per million [35]. It is currently not known who is at risk of a GH-secreting adenoma. Acromegaly is slightly more common in females than in males, but men tend to be diagnosed with the disorder earlier in life than women, usually before 45 years of age [26, 28, 31, 3641].

Acromegaly is characterized by slowly progressive somatic disfigurement and systemic manifestations as depicted in Fig. 1, at the maximal reported rates shown in Fig. 2. For differential diagnosis, the most recent joint United States Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline for acromegaly recommends measurement of IGF-1 levels in patients with typical clinical manifestations of acromegaly, especially those with acral and facial features (Fig. 1) [10]. As a result of the overlap of symptoms with those of other conditions such as sleep apnoea syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, hyperhidrosis, hypertension, and cardiac disease (arrhythmias, left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction), IGF-1 levels should be tested in patients without the typical features of acromegaly but who have symptoms of these conditions [10, 42, 43]. In a case of suspected acromegaly, an elevated IGF-1 level and a failure to suppress GH below 1 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) confirm the diagnosis [10, 44].
Fig. 1

Typical features of acromegaly

Fig. 2

Maximal reported rates of the most common manifestations of acromegaly [25, 26, 31, 33, 36, 5658, 77, 80, 85, 86, 97, 222234]. IGT impaired glucose tolerance; LVD left ventricular diastolic; LVH left ventricular hypertrophy

Difficulties with diagnosis

The slow manifestation of symptoms means that there is an average delay in diagnosis of acromegaly of 6–7 years after the first appearance of symptoms; in some patients, it may take as long as 35 years [26, 33, 41, 45]. Such a delay is partially related to the fact that slowly progressing changes in physical features may remain unnoticed by patients and the people around them until the first manifestation of complications.

It is important to be aware of a number of facts related to interpretation of test results that may complicate a diagnosis of acromegaly. Difficulties in interpreting GH level are related to the pulsatility of GH secretion, which is absent in patients with acromegaly. Increasing age, female gender, and obesity can be associated with abnormal GH suppression in response to OGTT [10]. A random GH >30 ng/mL can be seen in patients without acromegaly.

Because IGF-1 levels decrease with age after adolescence [46], they must be assessed in relation to age- and gender-appropriate normal values for the specific assay used [10]. Falsely positive diagnoses may be made in late-stage adolescent patients or during pregnancy [10]. Patients taking oral oestrogens may have low IGF-1 levels. Also, patients with hepatic or renal failure, hypothyroidism, malnutrition, severe infection, hepatic disease, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus may have abnormal IGF-1 levels compared with healthy individuals [4749]. In addition, because variability between GH and IGF-1 assays used at different laboratories is significant, and standardization of assays is lacking, correct interpretation of results requires knowledge of the specific assay used [10, 44, 50, 51].

A challenging diagnostic issue presents in patients with diabetes mellitus, because these patients can have an abnormal IGF-1 level or an abnormal response to OGTT (or both) [10, 52]. In diabetic patients, diagnosis is usually based on readouts from multi-sample day curves for GH, and GH values >1 ng/mL are considered abnormal. Re-evaluation by a specialized endocrinologist is highly recommended in these patients.

There is still an unmet need for validated symptom-scoring tools aiding recognition of patients with acromegaly, and research is providing some tools that may become clinically useful in due course [5355]. The ACROSCORE is a 14-point scoring system based on the cardinal symptoms and signs of acromegaly and developed for the clinical screening of acromegaly [55]. Although still not validated, the ACROSCORE might become an easy-to-use tool to diagnose acromegaly early in the disease course, thus allowing patients with acromegaly to be distinguished from those in whom acromegaly has been ruled out.

Other tools in development combine biochemical and clinical parameters to measure disease activity, and they could be useful not only for diagnosis of acromegaly, but also for evaluating the effects of treatment [53, 54]. The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome tool to assess the key features of acromegaly and thus assist endocrinologists managing acromegaly in practice, with promising results from a pilot study [53]. SAGIT combines signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities, GH levels, IGF-1 levels, and tumour profile. Finally, ACRODAT is a decision algorithm based on IGF-1 level (SD score), tumour status (change on magnetic resonance imaging), comorbidities (number and severity), signs and symptoms (Patient Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire score), and health-related quality of life (scored on a disease-specific measure) [54]. In a modelling exercise performed for this score, biochemical and tumour statuses were shown to be the primary predictors of disease activity [54].

Consequences of delayed diagnosis

Earlier diagnosis and treatment, as well as appropriate follow-up, may potentially limit or avoid the life-long consequences of uncontrolled disease and reduce mortality risk. On the other hand, late diagnosis and therefore long-term exposure to GH and IGF-1 excess may result in comorbidities that are difficult to manage and, in some cases, may persist even after biochemical control is achieved. The most serious long-term consequences of untreated acromegaly are hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, arthropathies, and obstructive sleep apnoea [25, 29, 31, 5660] and patients have significant deterioration in quality of life [61].

Hypertension and diabetes are very important risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with acromegaly, and approximately half of patients are at intermediate or high risk of coronary artery disease [62]. Patients with an estimated disease duration of longer than 10 years have a threefold higher relative risk of cardiac complications than do patients with an estimated disease duration of 5 years or less [63]. In normal health, GH and IGF-1 have a regulatory role in the cardiovascular system, and patients with elevated GH and IGF-1 levels therefore often demonstrate both structural and functional abnormalities and diastolic dysfunction, as well as abnormalities in the vascular system. Early symptoms of acromegaly-associated cardiomyopathy include cardiac hypertrophy, an elevated heart rate, and increased systolic dysfunction [42, 59, 60, 62, 63]. If left untreated, these initial symptoms may develop into more pronounced hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and systolic insufficiency during exercise [59]. The standardized mortality ratio for patients with acromegaly ranges from 1.1 to 3.2 in different countries [25, 26, 36, 37, 6466], with the main causes of death being cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disorders, and respiratory disorders [28, 36, 37, 65, 67, 68].

Early diagnosis and early initiation of treatment in acromegalic patients can prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease and reduce the risk of premature death [69]. However, it is still unknown for how long cardiovascular comorbidities remain reversible. Although treatment to reduce GH and IGF-1 levels can decrease risk of cardiac hypertrophy and arrhythmias, as well as improve diastolic function [70], improvements in systolic function and response to exercise depend mostly on disease duration and the presence of hypertension and diabetes [63]. Coronary artery calcifications correlate with disease duration [71], but the clinical impact of treatment on coronary artery disease remains unknown. Hypertension is the main contributor to increased mortality in acromegaly and, unlike hyperglycaemia (which resolves in the majority of patients in remission), it persists in most cases after biochemical control is achieved [72, 73]. With regard to hyperglycaemia, GH excess contributes to the development of insulin resistance [74] and endothelial dysfunction [75]. Cardiovascular risk factors for hyperglycaemia, such as glucose homeostasis alterations, may also be present in acromegalic patients despite long-lasting GH/IGF-1 control [76].

Joint problems, such as arthralgia, are common symptoms, occurring in at least half of patients with acromegaly [25, 77]. Although reduction in joint thickness upon disease control has been observed, some joint problems may persist despite treatment for acromegaly [69, 78, 79]. Due to its mechanism, arthropathy may be reversed with early treatment for acromegaly, but this is less likely if the disease has been left untreated for several years [80, 81]. Patients with acromegaly are at increased risk of vertebral fractures, but the impact of acromegaly on bone mineral density (BMD) is still unclear [8284]. Fracture risk is significantly associated with the duration of uncontrolled disease [83, 85]. Although BMD has been shown to improve upon biochemical control, risk of vertebral fractures persists in some patients [85, 86].

In addition to physical impairment, sleep apnoea is more common and more severe in patients with active acromegaly than in those with controlled disease [8789]. The apnoea–hypopnoea index and tongue volume have been shown to be reduced on normalization of IGF-1 in treated patients [89, 90].

Patients with acromegaly also display impairment of cognitive performance, particularly in memory tests [58, 91], and increased anxiety-related personality traits [56]. A longer duration of uncontrolled acromegaly may be associated with neurocognitive complications of greater severity. Conversely, a longer duration of postoperative biochemical remission of acromegaly is associated with a better neurocognitive state [58]. Improvements in cognition and mental health upon control of acromegaly appear to be only partial: memory recall, concentration, learning capability, and accuracy remain impaired in patients with controlled disease compared with healthy control subjects [58].

Several studies have suggested an increased risk of cancer (including those originating from intestines, brain, breast, thyroid, uterus, prostate, kidney, and skin) in patients with acromegaly [9295]. However, in the most recent analysis of 446 patients from the German Acromegaly Registry, the overall cancer rate was slightly lower than that in the general population and not significantly higher for colorectal, breast, thyroid, prostate, and lung cancers [96]. Although IGF-1 has been shown to play a role in the development of cancerous changes in thyroid cells, an expected association of thyroid cancer with acromegaly remains controversial. Although some studies demonstrated thyroid cancer in 4.7–5.6 % of patients with acromegaly [92, 97, 98], a rate slightly higher than that in the general population, others found no increase in the prevalence of thyroid cancer in acromegalic patients compared with the general population [96, 99].

In summary, prevention of development of comorbidities associated with GH or IGF-1 excess in patients with acromegaly through early diagnosis and treatment is of great importance. The “red flags” that should trigger further investigations for acromegaly include: a long duration of signs and symptoms such as arthralgia and sleep apnoea; early onset of cardiovascular disease, impaired glucose and lipid metabolism, and osteoporosis and vertebral fractures; persistence of symptoms such as hypertension, impaired glucose metabolism, and arthralgia despite treatment; atypical diabetes; and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Early intervention may limit the development of deleterious consequences of GH or IGF-1 excess.

Cushing’s disease

The incidence of Cushing’s disease is estimated at 1.2–2.4 per million per year [100, 101], with a prevalence of 29.1 per million population [100]. Like acromegaly, Cushing’s disease is more common in females than in males, with a reported male-to-female ratio between 1:1.5 and 1:15 [100115]. As with acromegaly, the true number of patients with Cushing’s disease may be underestimated. This is because Cushing’s disease is also found in people who are initially diagnosed with pituitary incidentalomas [116] and may also be unrecognised in individuals diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, or depression [117120]. For example, it has been reported that 9 % of patients with type 2 diabetes also fulfil the criteria for subclinical Cushing’s disease [121].

A diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is the usual first step for a diagnosis of Cushing’s disease and can be made once non-pituitary causes of hypercortisolism have been excluded. Detection relies first on clinical suspicion followed by biochemical confirmation [122]. The signs and symptoms of Cushing’s disease are widespread (Fig. 3), and some symptoms and complications are more frequent in males than in females. These include purple striae, muscle atrophy, osteoporosis, and nephrolithiasis [111]. The most common manifestations of Cushing’s disease are cardiovascular, metabolic, or endocrine disorders, central obesity, and dermatological features (for instance easy bruising, red face) [123, 124]; the relative incidence of the various manifestations of Cushing’s disease are summarized in Fig. 4. A definitive diagnosis of hypercortisolism can be established by repeat measurements of an elevated 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC) concentration. Alternatively, late-night salivary cortisol levels support the diagnosis if there is a loss of the circadian rhythm of cortisol levels. Endogenous hypercortisolism is confirmed if there is a lack of cortisol suppression (below an adequate threshold, usually 50 nmol/L) after a low-dose (1 mg) overnight dexamethasone suppression test [125].
Fig. 3

Signs and symptoms of Cushing’s disease

Fig. 4

Maximal reported rates of the most common signs, symptoms, and comorbidities in patients with Cushing’s disease [100, 103, 104, 111, 112, 114, 146, 147, 235237]

Difficulties with diagnosis

The clinical presentation of Cushing’s syndrome or disease varies depending on the severity and duration of hypercortisolism [122]. In severe, overt hypercortisolism, the signs and symptoms (e.g. proximal muscle weakness, increased abdominal or facial fat, wasting of extremities, and wide purple striae) can easily be attributed to Cushing’s disease, but in many patients, not all the symptoms characteristic of Cushing’s disease are present, and patients with subclinical cortisol secretion or cyclic hypercortisolism may not present in a classical way [126]. Common manifestations are central weight gain, hypertension, and changes in memory, mood, and concentration. As with acromegaly, the overlap of many of the signs and symptoms of this disease with those of other conditions (such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression) contribute to delayed diagnosis of typically 2 to 6 years after the first appearance of symptoms [19, 103, 127].

Difficulties with diagnosis may also relate to the interpretation of biochemical tests. Normal cortisol levels fluctuate in a circadian pattern; therefore, multiple tests are required to reduce the risk of false-positive or false-negative results [128, 129]. In addition, some patients (with pseudo-Cushing’s syndrome) may have an elevated UFC or abnormal response to dexamethasone (or both) and some symptoms suggestive of Cushing’s syndrome despite absence of the disease [130]. Pseudo-Cushing’s syndrome can be associated with chronic alcohol consumption, depression, severe obesity, and chronic stress [131].

Additionally, use of biochemical tests for Cushing’s disease in routine clinical practice may not be optimal, because multiple protocols and different cut-off criteria often exist for each assay [132]. Therefore expertise is needed to conduct the tests and interpret the results [129, 133].

Furthermore, many steroid medications (glucocorticoids, inhaled and topical corticosteroids, oral oestrogens) and treatment combinations including ritonavir affect cortisol levels; in some cases, this can lead to symptoms of hypercortisolism as well as affect the diagnostic utility of the results [125, 134141].

Consequences of delayed diagnosis

Overproduction of ACTH in patients with pituitary adenomas leads to hyperstimulation of the adrenal glands and a chronic excess of cortisol, with deleterious effects on most tissues of the body (Fig. 4), negative effects on the patient’s quality of life [13, 61, 142], and, if untreated, increased mortality [143, 144]. Mortality rates are up to 9 times higher in patients with untreated Cushing’s disease than in the general population [101, 107, 110, 115, 145]. The main complications of untreated Cushing’s disease include: hypertension; metabolic diseases such as impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome; myopathy; and bone-related complications such as osteoporosis and fractures [100, 104, 111, 112, 114, 116, 146148].

Cure of the disease or at least control of hypercortisolism does not necessarily mean disappearance of comorbidities. Irreversibility of some of the complications is likely to be caused by a prolonged exposure to high cortisol levels due to the delay in diagnosis. This situation clearly emphasizes the need for greater awareness among physicians of the main “red flags” that should trigger testing for chronic hypercortisolism – uncontrolled hypertension possibly associated with hypokalaemia, atypical acquired diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis with or without vertebral fractures, hyperandrogenism and overweight (in women with a centripetal obesity), or thin skin – in patients who are younger than expected for these conditions [13].

Many cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidaemia, are improved upon resolution of hypercortisolism, but an increased cardiovascular risk may persist and manifest in the long term [149153]. Patients with Cushing’s disease have severe atherosclerotic damage; persistence of metabolic syndrome, vascular damage, and atherosclerotic plaques after normalization of cortisol levels contributes to a high cardiovascular risk despite treatment [150, 154]. Up to 2 % of patients with hypercortisolism die as a consequence of a thromboembolic event [155]. Factors contributing to the increased thromboembolic risk include a long duration of uncontrolled hypercortisolism, glucocorticoid-induced hypercoagulability, and obesity [112, 154]. This risk is thought to be already present 1–2 years before diagnosis of Cushing’s disease and may remain for months after surgery [113]. However, other studies report that 6 months after disease control, thromboembolic risk returns to the degree of risk seen in healthy individuals [156].

In general, the level of hypercortisolism correlates with the presence of impaired glucose tolerance, impaired insulin resistance, and diabetes [151]. Even 5 years after remission of Cushing’s syndrome, impaired glucose tolerance may persist [149]. Chronic hypercortisolism results in changes in body fat deposition and increased abdominal adiposity, with related metabolic consequences. Additionally, effects of excess cortisol in the brain can influence eating behaviour, with further contribution to the obese phenotype of patients with Cushing’s disease [157]. If the disease is controlled, significant reductions in total, abdominal visceral, subcutaneous, and bone marrow adipose tissue can be achieved, but most patients remain overweight or obese in the long term and remain at risk of cardiovascular disease [158, 159]. Dyslipidaemia tends to improve with correction of hypercortisolism, but complete normalization of lipid levels is usually not achieved, even after long-term remission [149, 150].

There are no specific studies on or guidelines for the management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Cushing’s disease. Nevertheless, based on the fact that these patients are usually at high or very high cardiovascular risk, standard practice should be applied to managing any cardiovascular risk factors that manifest in patients. Follow-up is recommended in the active phase of the disease and in the long term, because of the possible persistence of these risk factors after treatment-induced remission [160, 161]. The patient’s cardiovascular risk profile should be evaluated at least yearly. Hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and dyslipidaemia should be adequately treated, and particular attention should be paid to patients in remission for whom a more aggressive approach is recommended [160, 161].

Prolonged exposure to cortisol excess is detrimental to bone: reduced BMD and increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures can result [162, 163]. A study of a large consecutive cohort of 104 patients with Cushing’s syndrome demonstrated that the increased risk of fracture was confined to the last 2 years before diagnosis and the start of therapy; it reverted to normal after diagnosis and treatment [164]. This observation further supports the importance of prompt and accurate diagnosis of Cushing’s disease to prevent the effects of hypercortisolism on bone structure.

In addition, cortisol excess negatively affects the structure and function of brain tissue. Patients with active Cushing’s syndrome have a smaller hippocampus, enlarged ventricles, cerebral atrophy, and altered neurochemical concentrations and functional activity [165]. Some studies point to alterations in brain activity related to symptoms of depression and emotional memory in patients with hypercortisolism [166]. After treatment and abrogation of cortisol excess, when the patient is in long-term remission, structural and neurochemical alterations in brain tissue improve and correlate with improvements in clinical and behavioural outcomes. However, abnormalities in grey and white matter are not completely reversible and are associated with persistent psychological symptoms and impairments in cognitive functioning [165, 167].

Prolactinomas

Prolactinomas remain the most common secreting pituitary tumours [168, 169], accounting for 40–66 % of clinically relevant cases [3, 170, 171]. A recently published Swedish study by Tjörnstrand et al. reported a standardized incidence rate (SIR) of 1.6 per 100,000 adult patients diagnosed with pituitary adenomas in one county between 2001 and 2011 (accounting for 32 % of all pituitary adenomas) [172]. Finnish data support these findings: a SIR of 2.2 per 100,000 (51 % of all pituitary adenomas) has been reported [173]. Prolactinomas have an estimated prevalence of approximately 35–50 per 100,000 inhabitants [16, 33, 174] and occur most frequently in women aged 20–50 years, with a female-to-male ratio of approximately 10:1 [175].

The effects of hyperprolactinaemia in adult patients commonly include hypogonadism, infertility, sexual dysfunction, low BMD, and effects on the mammary glands (gynaecomastia, galactorrhoea) [176178]. During adolescence, delayed onset of puberty, oligo-amenorrhoea, and galactorrhoea may be seen in girls, and boys may have delayed pubertal development and hypogonadism [3]. “Red flags” that should trigger suspicion of prolactinoma are amenorrhoea or irregular menses associated with (inconstant) galactorrhoea, and sexual dysfunction in males.

Diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia and identification of its cause can be based on medical history, physical examination, clinical features, serum prolactin levels, biological investigations, and imaging of the pituitary region [179, 180]. The current Clinical Practice Guideline from the Endocrine Society for the diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia recommends a single measurement of serum prolactin, with diagnosis confirmed by a level above the upper limit of normal. Nevertheless, to account for possible prolactin pulsatility, multiple sampling (at 15- to 20-minute intervals) may be useful in confirmation of diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia [3]. Assay-specific normal values for prolactin are higher in women than in men and generally lower than 25 μg/L [3]. Prolactin levels higher than 500 μg/L are diagnostic of macroprolactinomas [181].

In contrast with the available biochemical assays for diagnosis of acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, those for prolactinoma are roughly comparable, and assessment is usually uncomplicated in the clinical setting [3]. However, in patients with very large prolactinomas (>3 cm), prolactin assays may falsely provide a lower-than-actual prolactin level because of antibody saturation. Further dilution of the sample is needed to avoid this potential trap [182].

Considerations for accurate diagnosis

The clinical presentation of prolactinoma is gender-specific. Women typically seek medical consultation because of the classic amenorrhoea–galactorrhoea syndrome associated with the condition, whereas men present with more general symptoms such as headache, gynaecomastia, impotence, and reduced libido [171]. Although galactorrhoea is the most characteristic manifestation of hyperprolactinaemia, it may not be present or may only manifest intermittently [183]. Up to 50 % of women with galactorrhoea have normal prolactin levels [184], but amenorrhoea associated with galactorrhoea strongly suggests hyperprolactinaemia [185].

Hyperprolactinaemia can be caused by a number of different conditions, which should be considered and ruled out to make a differential diagnosis. Some patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas have hyperprolactinaemia resulting from compression of the pituitary stalk and are at risk of misdiagnosis [186]. Patients with acromegaly may occasionally present with markedly elevated levels of prolactin in cases of GH- or prolactin-secreting adenomas [187], and hyperprolactinaemia may occur in a subset of patients with primary hypothyroidism [188, 189].

With regard to other conditions, renal insufficiency can lead to moderate hyperprolactinaemia [190, 191], and there are exceptional cases of non-pituitary tumours secreting prolactin, for instance renal cell carcinoma, gonadoblastoma, cervical carcinoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and colorectal adenocarcinoma [192196]. In generally healthy subjects, pregnancy, breastfeeding, stress, exercise, and sleep can cause prolactin elevation [197]. Iatrogenic hyperprolactinaemia can also occur (Table 1). For instance, risperidone and metoclopramide medication can lead to prolactin levels above 200 μg/L [198, 199]. Medication-related hyperprolactinaemia has been reported at 31 % in patients treated with neuroleptics, 28 % in those treated with neuroleptic-like drugs, 26 % in patients treated with antidepressants, and 5 % in patients taking H2-receptor antagonists [200]. In such cases of drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia, prolactin elevation is usually mild but can be highly variable [201].
Table 1

Pharmacological causes of hyperprolactinaemia [182]

Pharmacological group

Drugs

Antipsychotics

Typical: phenothiazines, butirophenones, thyoxanthenes

Atypical: risperidone, molindone, amisulpride, quetiapine, olanzapine

Antidepressants

Tricyclics: amitriptyline, desipramine, clomipramine

MAO inhibitors: pargyline, clorgyline

SSRIs: fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine

Antihypertensive drugs

Verapamil, α-methyldopa, reserpine, labetolol

Anticonvulsants

Phenytoin

Prokinetics

Metoclopramide, domperidone

Hormonal preparations

Oestrogen, danazol

H2-blockers

Cimetidine, ranitidine

Controlled substances

Opiates, methadone, morphine, apomorphine, heroin, cocaine, marijuana

Other

Anaesthetics, sibutramine, alcohol

MAO monoamine oxidase, SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

It is recommended, therefore, that diagnostic work-up includes assessment of TSH, free thyroxine (FT4), and creatinine levels to exclude secondary causes of hyperprolactinaemia. Many patients with hyperprolactinaemia have a predominance of high-molecular-weight prolactin (macroprolactinaemia) [202]. Most of these patients have unimpaired fertility and uneventful pregnancies, although they may present with some of the usual symptoms of hyperprolactinaemia such as galactorrhoea or menstrual disorders [202204]. Patients with macroprolactinaemia generally do not require treatment, but the diagnosis is complicated by the fact that prolactin levels are highly variable and overlap with those found in patients with monomeric hyperprolactinaemia [205]. The diagnostic protocol for macroprolactinaemia should be included in the laboratory work-up for patients with hyperprolactinaemia, to spare patients from unnecessary hormonal or radiological investigations and treatments.

Consequences of delayed diagnosis

Bone loss and vertebral fractures are the most common comorbidities of hyperprolactinaemia-mediated sex-steroid attenuation [206, 207]. In particular, spinal bone density is decreased by approximately 25 % in women with hyperprolactinaemia and may be permanent, although overt osteoporosis is rare [208]. Hyperprolactinaemia is an important cause of infertility in both women and men [185]. It can be reversed by appropriate treatment, for example with dopamine agonists [209, 210]. However, in some women with prolactinomas in whom hyperprolactinaemia has been corrected, two problems may potentially arise. First is the potential risk of the dopamine agonist to early fetal development, although reassuring data have been collected in pregnant women treated with bromocriptine and – in more limited cohorts – those treated with cabergoline [211]. Second, pregnancy itself may be detrimental because the increase in oestrogen levels may stimulate tumour growth [212, 213].

Although metabolic consequences of untreated hyperprolactinaemia can be expected, only limited data have been reported on the involvement of hyperprolactinaemia in the pathogenesis of obesity, glucose intolerance, and an impaired metabolic profile [214]. Importantly, treatment of prolactinoma has been shown to reduce the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and to improve the metabolic profile [215, 216].

Pituitary thyrotroph adenomas

Pituitary adenomas that produce TSH (TSH-omas) accounted for 0.7 % of pituitary adenomas in the study by Tjörnstrand et al. giving a SIR of 0.03 per 100,000 [172]. Another Swedish study reported the national prevalence in 2010 as 2.8 per 1 million inhabitants [217]. These data support earlier epidemiological reports suggesting that thyrotroph adenomas account for between 0.5 % and 2.0 % of pituitary adenomas overall [218, 219]. Unlike incidences of the other secreting pituitary adenomas, that of thyrotroph adenomas is similar in women and men [218].

Patients with TSH-omas usually present with signs and symptoms typical of hyperthyroidism, and the presence of goitre is an almost constant symptom of pituitary thyrotroph adenoma [4]. The typical features include nervousness, irritability, increased perspiration, increased heart rate, hand tremors, anxiety, difficulty sleeping, muscular weakness, frequent diarrhoea, weight loss, and oligo-amenorrhoea. However, these features may be overshadowed by symptoms related to hypersecretion or deficiency of other pituitary hormones [4]. As reported in an overview by Beck-Peccoz et al. [4], dysfunction of the gonadal axis is less common than hyperthyroid features in patients with TSH-omas, but it is not rare. Menstrual disorders occur in approximately one-third of cases in females, mainly those with mixed TSH or prolactin-secreting adenomas. In males with TSH-secreting pituitary adenomas, central hypogonadism, delayed puberty, and decreased libido may manifest [4]. The predominant signs and symptoms of pituitary thyrotroph adenomas are related to expanding tumour mass, including hypopituitarism, headaches (in 20–25 % of patients), and visual field defects (in 50 % of patients) [4].

For biochemical diagnosis, European guidelines for the diagnosis of thyrotropin-secreting pituitary tumours recommend the measurement of circulating free tri-iodothyronine (FT3) and FT4 by using “two-step” methods (e.g. equilibrium dialysis and radioimmunoassay or adsorption chromatography and radioimmunoassay, with back-titration) in addition to TSH measurement for accurate differential diagnosis [220]. TSH-oma should be suspected if the patient presents with hyperthyroidism and high circulating levels of FT4 and FT3 and if TSH is not suppressed in thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation tests [220]. Serum TSH levels in patients with TSH-oma are mildly elevated or in the normal range [220]. In the context of elevated thyroid hormone levels, a normal TSH value excludes a priori peripheral thyroid disease (e.g. Graves’ disease) except when there is resistance to thyroid hormones [221]. Therefore, TSH measurement is mandatory in the diagnostic procedure in case of hyperthyroidism.

Considerations for accurate diagnosis

Using the two-step methods suggested by Beck-Peccoz et al., other conditions that can result in detectable serum TSH and hyperthyroxinaemia (e.g. pregnancy, resistance to thyroid hormone [RTH], familial dysalbuminaemic hyperthyroxinaemia, and presence of T3 or T4 autoantibodies or circulating heterophilic antibodies) can be distinguished from hyperthyroidism secondary to secreting pituitary thyrotroph adenomas [4]. Differential diagnosis of pituitary thyrotroph adenomas and hyperthyroidism due to RTH syndrome can be made by using the following criteria: family history (signifies RTH not TSH-oma); pituitary lesions on imaging (signify TSH-oma); and germinal thyroid hormone receptor beta mutation (signifies RTH not TSH-oma) [4]. In cases with elevated levels of the alpha-subunit of pituitary glycoprotein hormone (a-GSU), elevated sex-hormone-binding globulin, and a high molar a-GSU:TSH ratio, TSH-oma rather than RTH can be suspected.

Consequences of delayed diagnosis

Early diagnosis and proper treatment of TSH-omas can prevent the appearance of the signs and symptoms associated with mechanical compression of the adjacent structures by the expanding tumour mass (i.e. visual field defects, headache, and hypopituitarism) [4]. In addition, accurate diagnosis prevents improper thyroid ablation in those patients with central hyperthyroidism in whom the clinical manifestations of TSH-omas would not be prevented [220].

Conclusions

Secreting pituitary adenomas are rare conditions that remain under-diagnosed. Diagnosis – particularly of acromegaly and Cushing’s disease – can be challenging because healthcare professionals not dedicated to pituitary disorders may lack awareness of these diseases and may therefore neglect the “red flags” that may suggest them. The typical physical features are slow to manifest, and because patients generally present with signs and symptoms that overlap with those of conditions commonly seen in primary care, diagnosis may be missed or delayed. A long duration of active disease is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Increasing efforts to support the early diagnosis and treatment of these diseases is warranted, and the deleterious effects of secreting pituitary adenomas should not be overlooked.

Abbreviations

ACTH: 

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

a-GSU: 

Alpha-subunit of pituitary glycoprotein hormone

BMD: 

Bone mineral density

FT3: 

Free tri-iodothyronine

FT4: 

Free thyroxine

GH: 

Growth hormone

GP: 

General practitioner

IGF-1: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1

OGTT: 

Oral glucose tolerance test

RTH: 

Resistance to thyroid hormone

SIR: 

Standardized incidence rate

TSH: 

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

UFC: 

Urinary free cortisol

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors received editorial and writing support in the preparation of this manuscript from Agnieszka Rarok, PhD, of Excerpta Medica.

Funding

Editorial and writing support in the preparation of this manuscript was funded by Novartis AG.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed.

Authors’ contributions

TB and FC made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript, and were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. Both authors also gave final approval of the version to be published. Both authors participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Authors’ information

TB, MD, PhD, is Professor of Endocrinology at Aix-Marseille University, Head of the “ENDO” Division (endocrinology, nutrition, diabetes, and obesity) at Conception University Hospital, and leader of a research team in neuroendocrinology at the CRN2M Laboratory (Aix-Marseille University and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique [CNRS]), all in Marseille, France.

FC, MD, PhD, is Professor of Endocrinology at Aix-Marseille University, Endocrinologist in the Department of Endocrinology at Conception University Hospital, and a member of the same team at the CRN2M Laboratory.

Competing interests

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hôpital de la Conception 147
(2)
Pôle ENDO (Endocrinologie Nutrition Diabète Obésité)

References

  1. Yamada S, Ohyama K, Taguchi M, Takeshita A, Morita K, Takano K, Sano T. A study of the correlation between morphological findings and biological activities in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):580–4. discussion 584–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ntali G, Capatina C, Grossman A, Karavitaki N. Clinical review: functioning gonadotroph adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4423–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, Wass JA, Endocrine Society. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):273–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L, Lania A. Thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas [Updated 2015 May 1]. In: De Groot LJ, Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, McLachlan R, New M, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Weicker MO, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth: MDText.com, Inc; 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Raverot G, Wierinckx A, Dantony E, Auger C, Chapas G, Villeneuve L, Brue T, Figarella-Branger D, Roy P, Jouanneau E, Jan M, Lachuer J, Trouillas J, HYPOPRONOS. Prognostic factors in prolactin pituitary tumors: clinical, histological, and molecular data from a series of 94 patients with a long postoperative follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(4):1708–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Ieva A, Rotondo F, Syro LV, Cusimano MD, Kovacs K. Aggressive pituitary adenomas--diagnosis and emerging treatments. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(7):423–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(4):610–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Valette-Kasic S, Dufour H, Mugnier M, Trouillas J, Valdes-Socin H, Caron P, Morange S, Girard N, Grisoli F, Jaquet P, Brue T. Markers of tumor invasion are major predictive factors for the long-term outcome of corticotroph microadenomas treated by transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143(6):761–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G, Bonneville JF, Assaker R, Auger C, Brue T, Cornelius A, Dufour H, Jouanneau E, François P, Galland F, Mougel F, Chapuis F, Villeneuve L, Maurage CA, Figarella-Branger D, Raverot G, members of HYPOPRONOS, Barlier A, Bernier M, Bonnet F, Borson-Chazot F, Brassier G, Caulet-Maugendre S, Chabre O, Chanson P, Cottier JF, Delemer B, Delgrange E, Di Tommaso L, Eimer S, Gaillard S, Jan M, Girard JJ, Lapras V, Loiseau H, Passagia JG, Patey M, Penfornis A, Poirier JY, Perrin G, Tabarin A. A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(1):123–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Katznelson L, Laws Jr ER, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA, Endocrine Society. Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):3933–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Praw SS, Heaney AP. Medical treatment of Cushing’s disease: overview and recent findings. Int J Gen Med. 2009;2:209–17.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Klibanski A, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Lamberts SW, Strasburger CJ, Wass JA, Giustina A. A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications. Pituitary. 2013;16(3):294–302.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Colao A, Boscaro M, Ferone D, Casanueva FF. Managing Cushing’s disease: the state of the art. Endocrine. 2014;47(1):9–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer. 2004;101(3):613–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Krikorian A, Aron D. Evaluation and management of pituitary incidentalomas – revisiting an acquaintance. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2(3):138–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, Olafsdottir E, Steinthorsdottir V, Sigurdsson G, Thorsson AV, Carroll PV, Korbonits M, Benediktsson R. The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955–2012: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(5):655–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chanson P, Salenave S, Kamenicky P, Cazabat L, Young J. Pituitary tumours: acromegaly. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23(5):555–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Melmed S. Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(11):3189–202.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Castinetti F, Morange I, Conte-Devolx B, Brue T. Cushing’s disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller RE, Learned-Miller EG, Trainer P, Paisley A, Blanz V. Early diagnosis of acromegaly: computers vs clinicians. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;75(2):226–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider HJ, Kosilek RP, Günther M, Roemmler J, Stalla GK, Sievers C, Reincke M, Schopohl J, Würtz RP. A novel approach to the detection of acromegaly: accuracy of diagnosis by automatic face classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2074–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosilek RP, Frohner R, Würtz RP, Berr CM, Schopohl J, Reincke M, Schneider HJ. Diagnostic use of facial image analysis software in endocrine and genetic disorders: review, current results and future perspectives. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M39–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wagenmakers MA, Roerink SH, Maal TJ, Maal TJ, Pelleboer RH, Smit JW, Hermus AR, Bergé SJ, Netea-Maier RT, Xi T. Three-dimensional facial analysis in acromegaly: a novel tool to quantify craniofacial characteristics after long-term remission. Pituitary. 2015;18(1):126–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuny T, Pertuit M, Sahnoun-Fathallah M, Daly A, Occhi G, Odou MF, Tabarin A, Nunes ML, Delemer B, Rohmer V, Desailloud R, Kerlan V, Chabre O, Sadoul JL, Cogne M, Caron P, Cortet-Rudelli C, Lienhardt A, Raingeard I, Guedj AM, Brue T, Beckers A, Weryha G, Enjalbert A, Barlier A. Genetic analysis in young patients with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas: besides AIP don’t forget MEN1 genetic analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(4):533–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Mockel J, Velkeniers B, Muermans K, Maiter D. AcroBel – the Belgian registry on acromegaly: a survey of the ‘real-life’ outcome in 418 acromegalic subjects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(4):399–409.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Etxabe J, Gaztambide S, Latorre P, Vazquez JA. Acromegaly: an epidemiological study. J Endocrinol Invest. 1993;16(3):181–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya C. Epidemiology of acromegaly. Pituitary. 1999;2(1):29–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Sane T, Reunanen A, Välimäki MJ, Niskanen L, Markkanen H, Löyttyniemi E, Ebeling T, Jaatinen P, Laine H, Nuutila P, Salmela P, Salmi J, Stenman UH, Viikari J, Voutilainen E. A nationwide survey of mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(7):4081–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mercieca C, Gruppetta M, Vassallo J. Epidemiology, treatment trends and outcomes of acromegaly. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(8):e206–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ritchie CM, Atkinson AB, Kennedy AL, Lyons AR, Gordon DS, Fannin T, Hadden DR. Ascertainment and natural history of treated acromegaly in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 1990;59(1):55–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S, Gomez JM, Halperin I, Lucas-Morante T, Moreno B, Obiols G, de Pablos P, Paramo C, Pico A, Torres E, Varela C, Vazquez JA, Zamora J, Albareda M, Gilabert M. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (Registro Español de Acromegalia, REA). Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(4):439–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Cannavò S, Ferraù F, Ragonese M, Curtò L, Torre ML, Magistri M, Marchese A, Alibrandi A, Trimarchi F. Increased prevalence of acromegaly in a highly polluted area. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(4):509–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA. Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(3):377–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Burton T, Le Nestour E, Neary M, Ludlam WH. Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US health plan database. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):262–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider HJ, Sievers C, Saller B, Wittchen HU, Stalla GK. High prevalence of biochemical acromegaly in primary care patients with elevated IGF-1 levels. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69(3):432–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Arosio M, Reimondo G, Malchiodi E, Berchialla P, Borraccino A, De Marinis L, Pivonello R, Grottoli S, Losa M, Cannavò S, Minuto F, Montini M, Bondanelli M, De Menis E, Martini C, Angeletti G, Velardo A, Peri A, Faustini-Fustini M, Tita P, Pigliaru F, Borretta G, Scaroni C, Bazzoni N, Bianchi A, Appetecchia M, Cavagnini F, Lombardi G, Ghigo E, Beck-Peccoz P, Colao A, Terzolo M, Italian Study Group of Acromegaly. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in acromegaly: an Italian survey. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167(2):189–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ayuk J, Clayton RN, Holder G, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM, Bates AS. Growth hormone and pituitary radiotherapy, but not serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations, predict excess mortality in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(4):1613–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fieffe S, Morange I, Petrossians P, Chanson P, Rohmer V, Cortet C, Borson-Chazot F, Brue T, Delemer B, French Acromegaly Registry. Diabetes in acromegaly, prevalence, risk factors, and evolution: data from the French Acromegaly Registry. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(6):877–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersenn S, Buchfelder M, Gerbert B, Franz H, Quabbe HJ, Schulte HM, Grussendorf M, Reincke M, Participants of the German Acromegaly Register. Age and sex as predictors of biochemical activity in acromegaly: analysis of 1485 patients from the German Acromegaly Register. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(3):400–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Schöfl C, Franz H, Grussendorf M, Honegger J, Jaursch-Hancke C, Mayr B, Schopohl J, Participants of the German Acromegaly Register. Long-term outcome in patients with acromegaly: analysis of 1344 patients from the German Acromegaly Register. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;168(1):39–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sesmilo G, Gaztambide S, Venegas E, Picó A, Del Pozo C, Blanco C, Torres E, Álvarez-Escolà C, Fajardo C, García R, Cámara R, Bernabeu I, Soto A, Villabona C, Serraclara A, Halperin I, Alcázar V, Palomera E, Webb SM, REA investigators. Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA). Pituitary. 2013;16(1):115–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G. Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(1):102–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Melmed S. Medical progress: Acromegaly. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2558–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD, Klibanski A, Lamberts S, Casanueva FF, Trainer P, Ghigo E, Ho K, Melmed S, Acromegaly Consensus Group. A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3141–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrossians P, Tichomirowa MA, Stevenaert A, Martin D, Daly AF, Beckers A. The Liege Acromegaly Survey (LAS): a new software tool for the study of acromegaly. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2012;73(3):190–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Luna AM, Wilson DM, Wibbelsman CJ, Brown RC, Nagashima RJ, Hintz RL, Rosenfeld RG. Somatomedins in adolescence: a cross-sectional study of the effect of puberty on plasma insulin-like growth factor I and II levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(2):268–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Caregaro L, Favaro A, Santonastaso P, Alberino F, Di Pascoli L, Nardi M, Favaro S, Gatta A. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), a nutritional marker in patients with eating disorders. Clin Nutr. 2001;20(3):251–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Livingstone C. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and clinical nutrition. Clin Sci (Lond). 2013;125(6):265-80.Google Scholar
  49. Weber MM, Auernhammer CJ, Lee PD, Engelhardt D, Zachoval R. Insulin-like growth factors and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in adult patients with severe liver disease before and after orthotopic liver transplantation. Horm Res. 2002;57(3–4):105–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bidlingmaier M, Friedrich N, Emeny RT, Spranger J, Wolthers OD, Roswall J, Körner A, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Hübener C, Dahlgren J, Frystyk J, Pfeiffer AF, Doering A, Bielohuby M, Wallaschofski H, Arafat AM. Reference intervals for insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) from birth to senescence: results from a multicenter study using a new automated chemiluminescence IGF-I immunoassay conforming to recent international recommendations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1712–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Frystyk J, Freda P, Clemmons DR. The current status of IGF-I assays – a 2009 update. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2010;20(1):8–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Clayton KL, Holly JM, Carlsson LM, Jones J, Cheetham TD, Taylor AM, Dunger DB. Loss of the normal relationships between growth hormone, growth hormone-binding protein and insulin-like growth factor-I in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;41(4):517–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Giustina A, Bevan JS, Bronstein MD, Casanueva FF, Chanson P, Petersenn S, Thanh XM, Sert C, Houchard A, Guillemin I, Melmed S, SAGIT Investigator Group. SAGIT®: clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice – development and results from a pilot study. Pituitary. 2016;19(1):39–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Pleil A, van der Lely AJ, Badia X, Brue T, Buchfelder M, Burman P, Ghigo E, Gomez R, Jorgensen JO, Luger A, van der Lans-Bussemaker J, Webb S, Strasburger C. Development of a prediction model of disease activity in support of clinical practice - the Acrodat experience. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A708.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Prencipe N, Floriani I, Guaraldi F, Di Giacomo SV, Cannavo S, Arnaldi G, Berton A, Torri V, Spinello M, Arvat E, Ghigo E, Grottoli S. ACROSCORE: a new and simple tool for the diagnosis of acromegaly, a rare and underdiagnosed disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;84(3):380–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Sievers C, Ising M, Pfister H, Dimopoulou C, Schneider HJ, Roemmler J, Schopohl J, Stalla GK. Personality in patients with pituitary adenomas is characterized by increased anxiety-related traits: comparison of 70 acromegalic patients with patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas and age- and gender-matched controls. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(3):367–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Akdeniz B, Gedik A, Turan O, Ozpelit E, Ikiz AO, Itil O, Badak O, Baris N, Cömlekçi A. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function according to new criteria and determinants in acromegaly. Int Heart J. 2012;53(5):299–305.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Martín-Rodríguez JF, Madrazo-Atutxa A, Venegas-Moreno E, Benito-López P, Gálvez MÁ, Cano DA, Tinahones FJ, Torres-Vela E, Soto-Moreno A, Leal-Cerro A. Neurocognitive function in acromegaly after surgical resection of GH-secreting adenoma versus naïve acromegaly. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60041.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Colao A. Long-term acromegaly and associated cardiovascular complications: a case-based review. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23 Suppl 1:S31–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Golkowski F, Krzentowska-Korek A, Baldys-Waligorska A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A. Goiter, cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in patients with acromegaly. Endocr Regul. 2011;45(4):191–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Santos A, Resmini E, Martínez MA, Martí C, Ybarra J, Webb SM. Quality of life in patients with pituitary tumors. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009;16(4):299–303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Cannavo S, Almoto B, Cavalli G, Squadrito S, Romanello G, Vigo MT, Fiumara F, Benvenga S, Trimarchi F. Acromegaly and coronary disease: an integrated evaluation of conventional coronary risk factors and coronary calcifications detected by computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3766–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Colao A, Pivonello R, Grasso LF, Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Savastano S, Lombardi G. Determinants of cardiac disease in newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly: results of a 10 year survey study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(5):713–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP. Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):61–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Orme SM, McNally RJ, Cartwright RA, Belchetz PE. Mortality and cancer incidence in acromegaly: a retrospective cohort study. United Kingdom Acromegaly Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(8):2730–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Trepp R, Stettler C, Zwahlen M, Seiler R, Diem P, Christ ER. Treatment outcomes and mortality of 94 patients with acromegaly. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(3):243–51. discussion 250–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN. An audit of outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Q J Med. 1993;86(5):293–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Fatti LM, Scacchi M, Pincelli AI, Lavezzi E, Cavagnini F. Prevalence and pathogenesis of sleep apnea and lung disease in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2001;4(4):259–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Colao A, Marzullo P, Cuocolo A, Spinelli L, Pivonello R, Bonaduce D, Salvatore M, Lombardi G. Reversal of acromegalic cardiomyopathy in young but not in middle-aged patients after 12 months of treatment with the depot long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58(2):169–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Colao A, Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Lombardi G, Pivonello R. Effects of initial therapy for five years with somatostatin analogs for acromegaly on growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels, tumor shrinkage, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3746–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Herrmann BL, Severing M, Schmermund A, Berg C, Budde T, Erbel R, Mann K. Impact of disease duration on coronary calcification in patients with acromegaly. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009;117(8):417–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Găloiu S, Jurcuţ R, Vlădaia A, Florian A, Purice M, Popescu BA, Ginghină C, Coculescu M. Structural and functional changes of carotid wall properties in patients with acromegaly are not restored after 1 year of GH/IGF1 normalization. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2012;120(4):238–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Bassareo PP, Marras AR, Mercuro G. Adolescent acromegaly and decreased arterial distensibility despite successful treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;77(1):79–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Clemmons DR. Roles of insulin-like growth factor-I and growth hormone in mediating insulin resistance in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2002;5(3):181–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Baykan M, Erem C, Gedikli O, Hacihasanoglu A, Erdogan T, Kocak M, Kaplan S, Korkmaz L, Celik S. Impairment in flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery in acromegaly. Med Princ Pract. 2009;18(3):228–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Ronchi CL, Varca V, Beck-Peccoz P, Orsi E, Donadio F, Baccarelli A, Giavoli C, Ferrante E, Lania A, Spada A, Arosio M. Comparison between six-year therapy with long-acting somatostatin analogs and successful surgery in acromegaly: effects on cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):121–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Tagliafico A, Resmini E, Ferone D, Martinoli C. Musculoskeletal complications of acromegaly: what radiologists should know about early manifestations. Radiol Med. 2011;116(5):781–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Smit JWA, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F. Morbidity after long-term remission for acromegaly: persisting joint-related complaints cause reduced quality of life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):2731–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Claessen KMJA, Ramautar SR, Pereira AM, Smit JW, Roelfsema F, Romijn JA, Kroon HM, Kloppenburg M, Biermasz NR. Progression of acromegalic arthropathy despite long-term biochemical control: a prospective, radiological study. Eur J Endocrinol Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 2012;167(2):235–44.Google Scholar
  80. Ruchala M, Skiba A, Gurgul E, Uruski P, Wasko R, Sowinski J. The occurrence of thyroid focal lesions and a need for fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with acromegaly due to an increased risk of thyroid cancer. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(3):382–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Biermasz NR, van ’t Klooster R, Wassenaar MJ, Malm SH, Claessen KM, Nelissen RG, Roelfsema F, Pereira AM, Kroon HM, Stoel BC, Romijn JA, Kloppenburg M. Automated image analysis of hand radiographs reveals widened joint spaces in patients with long-term control of acromegaly: relation to disease activity and symptoms. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(3):407–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Mazziotti G, Bianchi A, Bonadonna S, Cimino V, Patelli I, Fusco A, Pontecorvi A, De Marinis L, Giustina A. Prevalence of vertebral fractures in men with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4649–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Mazziotti G, Bianchi A, Porcelli T, Mormando M, Maffezzoni F, Cristiano A, Giampietro A, De Marinis L, Giustina A. Vertebral fractures in patients with acromegaly: a 3-year prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(8):3402–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Mazziotti G, Biagioli E, Maffezzoni F, Spinello M, Serra V, Maroldi R, Floriani I, Giustina A. Bone turnover, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):384–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Bonadonna S, Mazziotti G, Nuzzo M, Bianchi A, Fusco A, De Marinis L, Giustina A. Increased prevalence of radiological spinal deformities in active acromegaly: a cross-sectional study in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(10):1837–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Claessen KMJA, Kroon HM, Pereira AM, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Verstegen MJ, Kloppenburg M, Hamdy NA, Biermasz NR. Progression of vertebral fractures despite long-term biochemical control of acromegaly: a prospective follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4808–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Davi’ MV, Dalle Carbonare L, Giustina A, Ferrari M, Frigo A, Lo Cascio V, Francia G. Sleep apnoea syndrome is highly prevalent in acromegaly and only partially reversible after biochemical control of the disease. Eur J Endocrinol Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 2008;159(5):533–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Akkoyunlu ME, Ilhan MM, Bayram M, Taşan E, Yakar F, Ozçelik HK, Karakose F, Kart L. Does hormonal control obviate positive airway pressure therapy in acromegaly with sleep-disordered breathing? Respir Med. 2013;107(11):1803–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Berg C, Wessendorf TE, Mortsch F, Forsting M, Teschler H, Weischer T, Mann K, Saller B, Herrmann BL. Influence of disease control with pegvisomant on sleep apnoea and tongue volume in patients with active acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 2009;161(6):829–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Herrmann BL, Wessendorf TE, Ajaj W, Kahlke S, Teschler H, Mann K. Effects of octreotide on sleep apnoea and tongue volume (magnetic resonance imaging) in patients with acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 2004;151(3):309–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Leon-Carrion J, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Madrazo-Atutxa A, Soto-Moreno A, Venegas-Moreno E, Torres-Vela E, Benito-López P, Gálvez MA, Tinahones FJ, Leal-Cerro A. Evidence of cognitive and neurophysiological impairment in patients with untreated naive acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4367–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Baris D, Gridley G, Ron E, Weiderpass E, Mellemkjaer L, Ekbom A, Olsen JH, Baron JA, Fraumeni Jr JF. Acromegaly and cancer risk: a cohort study in Sweden and Denmark. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13(5):395–400.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Sane T, Välimäki MJ, Markkanen H, Niskanen L, Ebeling T, Jaatinen P, Juonala M, Finnish Acromegaly Study Group. Increased cancer incidence in acromegaly – a nationwide survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(2):278–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Jenkins PJ. Acromegaly and cancer. Horm Res. 2004;62 Suppl 1:108–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Renehan AG, O’Connell J, O’Halloran D, Shanahan F, Potten CS, O’Dwyer ST, Shalet SM. Acromegaly and colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, biological mechanisms, and clinical implications. Horm Metab Res. 2003;35(11–12):712–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Petroff D, Tönjes A, Grussendorf M, Droste M, Dimopoulou C, Stalla G, Jaursch-Hancke C, Mai M, Schopohl J, Schöfl C. The incidence of cancer among acromegaly patients: results from the German Acromegaly Registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(10):3894–902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Tita P, Ambrosio MR, Scolio C, Carta A, Gangemi P, Bondanelli M, Vigneri R, Degli Uberti EC, Pezzino V. High prevalence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(2):161–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Gullu BE, Celik O, Gazioglu N, Kadioglu P. Thyroid cancer is the most common cancer associated with acromegaly. Pituitary. 2010;13(3):242–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Gasperi M, Martino E, Manetti L, Arosio M, Porretti S, Faglia G, Mariotti S, Colao AM, Lombardi G, Baldelli R, Camanni F, Liuzzi A, Acromegaly Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. Prevalence of thyroid diseases in patients with acromegaly: results of an Italian multicenter study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(3):240–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Etxabe J, Vazquez JA. Morbidity and mortality in Cushing’s disease: an epidemiological approach. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(4):479–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Lindholm J, Juul S, Jørgensen JO, Astrup J, Bjerre P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hagen C, Jørgensen J, Kosteljanetz M, Kristensen L, Laurberg P, Schmidt K, Weeke J. Incidence and late prognosis of Cushing’s syndrome: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(1):117–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, de Martin M, Cavagnini F. Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):440–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Valassi E, Santos A, Yaneva M, Tóth M, Strasburger CJ, Chanson P, Wass JA, Chabre O, Pfeifer M, Feelders RA, Tsagarakis S, Trainer PJ, Franz H, Zopf K, Zacharieva S, Lamberts SW, Tabarin A, Webb SM, ERCUSYN Study Group. The European Registry on Cushing’s syndrome: 2-year experience. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(3):383–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Alexandraki KI, Kaltsas GA, Vouliotis AI, Papaioannou TG, Trisk L, Zilos A, Korbonits M, Besser GM, Anastasakis A, Grossman AB. Specific electrocardiographic features associated with Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;74(5):558–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Alexandraki KI, Kaltsas GA, Isidori AM, Akker SA, Drake WM, Chew SL, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB. The prevalence and characteristic features of cyclicity and variability in Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(6):1011–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Assié G, Bahurel H, Coste J, Silvera S, Kujas M, Dugué MA, Karray F, Dousset B, Bertherat J, Legmann P, Bertagna X. Corticotroph tumor progression after adrenalectomy in Cushing’s disease: a reappraisal of Nelson’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(1):172–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Clayton RN, Raskauskiene D, Reulen RC, Jones PW. Mortality and morbidity in Cushing’s disease over 50 years in Stoke-on-Trent, UK: audit and meta-analysis of literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):632–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Gil-Cárdenas A, Herrera MF, Díaz-Polanco A, Rios JM, Pantoja JP. Nelson’s syndrome after bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease. Surgery. 2007;141(2):147–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-Cushing’s states. Endocr Rev. 1998;19(5):647–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Ntali G, Asimakopoulou A, Siamatras T, Komninos J, Vassiliadi D, Tzanela M, Tsagarakis S, Grossman AB, Wass JA, Karavitaki N. Mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: systematic analysis of a large series with prolonged follow-up. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(5):715–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Pecori Giraldi F, Moro M, Cavagnini F, Study Group on the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. Gender-related differences in the presentation and course of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1554–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Storr HL, Alexandraki KI, Martin L, Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Monson JP, Besser GM, Matson M, Evanson J, Afshar F, Sabin I, Savage MO, Grossman AB. Comparisons in the epidemiology, diagnostic features and cure rate by transsphenoidal surgery between paediatric and adult-onset Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(5):667–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Stuijver DJ, van Zaane B, Feelders RA, Debeij J, Cannegieter SC, Hermus AR, van den Berg G, Pereira AM, de Herder WW, Wagenmakers MA, Kerstens MN, Zelissen PM, Fliers E, Schaper N, Drent ML, Dekkers OM, Gerdes VE. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with Cushing’s syndrome: a multicenter cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):3525–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Witek P, Zieliński G, Szamotulska K, Witek J, Zgliczyński W. Complications of Cushing’s disease – prospective evaluation and clinical characteristics. Do they affect the efficacy of surgical treatment? Endokrynol Pol. 2012;63(4):277–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Yaneva M, Kalinov K, Zacharieva S. Mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: data from 386 patients from a single tertiary referral center. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(5):621–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Lake MG, Krook LS, Cruz SV. Pituitary adenomas: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88(5):319–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Guaraldi F, Salvatori R. Cushing syndrome: maybe not so uncommon of an endocrine disease. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):199–208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Holsboer F. The corticosteroid receptor hypothesis of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;23(5):477–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Trifanescu R, Carsote M, Caragheorgheopol A, Hortopan D, Dumitrascu A, Dobrescu M, Poiana C. Screening for secondary endocrine hypertension in young patients. Maedica (Buchar). 2013;8(2):108–15.Google Scholar
  120. Cosci F, Fava GA, Sonino N. Mood and anxiety disorders as early manifestations of medical illness: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(1):22–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Murakami H, Nigawara T, Sakihara S, Kageyama K, Yamashita M, Matsuki K, Tanabe J, Matsui J, Tamasawa N, Suda T. The frequency of type 2 diabetic patients who meet the endocrinological screening criteria of subclinical Cushing’s disease. Endocr J. 2010;57(3):267–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome: update on signs, symptoms and biochemical screening. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M33–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A. Treatment of Cushing’s disease. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(4):385–486.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, Newell-Price J, Biller BM, Colao A. Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):611–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Nieman LK. Update on subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2015;22(3):180–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Psaras T, Milian M, Hattermann V, Freiman T, Gallwitz B, Honegger J. Demographic factors and the presence of comorbidities do not promote early detection of Cushing’s disease and acromegaly. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119(1):21–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Pecori Giraldi F. Recent challenges in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Horm Res. 2009;71 Suppl 1:123–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Morris DG, Grossman AB. Dynamic tests in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(7 Suppl):64–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Alwani RA, Schmit Jongbloed LW, de Jong FH, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW, Feelders RA. Differentiating between Cushing’s disease and pseudo-Cushing’s syndrome: comparison of four tests. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(4):477–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Androulakis II, Kaltsas G, Chrousos. Pseudo-Cushing’s states. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–2015.Google Scholar
  132. Elamin MB, Murad MH, Mullan R, Erickson D, Harris K, Nadeem S, Ennis R, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Cushing’s syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalyses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1553–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Raff H. Update on late-night salivary cortisol for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: methodological considerations. Endocrine. 2013;44(2):346–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Vassiliadi D, Tsagarakis S. Unusual causes of Cushing’s syndrome. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2007;51(8):1245–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Carroll TB, Findling JW. Cushing’s syndrome of nonpituitary causes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009;16(4):308–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Foisy MM, Yakiwchuk EM, Chiu I, Singh AE. Adrenal suppression and Cushing’s syndrome secondary to an interaction between ritonavir and fluticasone: a review of the literature. HIV Med. 2008;9(6):389–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Lo J, Grinspoon SK. Adrenal function in HIV infection. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17(3):205–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Bernecker C, West TB, Mansmann G, Scherbaum WA, Willenberg HS. Hypercortisolism caused by ritonavir associated inhibition of CYP 3A4 under inhalative glucocorticoid therapy. 2 case reports and a review of the literature. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2012;120(3):125–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Levin C, Maibach HI. Topical corticosteroid-induced adrenocortical insufficiency: clinical implications. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(3):141–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Coureau B, Bussières JF, Tremblay S. Cushing’s syndrome induced by misuse of moderate- to high-potency topical corticosteroids. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(12):1903–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Tempark T, Phatarakijnirund V, Chatproedprai S, Watcharasindhu S, Supornsilchai V, Wananukul S. Exogenous Cushing’s syndrome due to topical corticosteroid application: case report and review literature. Endocrine. 2010;38(3):328–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Webb SM, Badia X, Barahona MJ, Colao A, Strasburger CJ, Tabarin A, van Aken MO, Pivonello R, Stalla G, Lamberts SW, Glusman JE. Evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with Cushing’s syndrome with a new questionnaire. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158(5):623–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Graversen D, Vestergaard P, Stochholm K, Gravholt CH, Jørgensen JO. Mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(3):278–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Dekkers OM, Horváth-Puhó E, Jørgensen JO, Cannegieter SC, Ehrenstein V, Vandenbroucke JP, Pereira AM, Sørensen HT. Multisystem morbidity and mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: a cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2277–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Roelfsema F, van Aken MO, Voormolen JH, Romijn JA. Mortality in patients treated for Cushing’s disease is increased, compared with patients treated for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):976–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Lambert JK, Goldberg L, Fayngold S, Kostadinov J, Post KD, Geer EB. Predictors of mortality and long-term outcomes in treated Cushing’s disease: a study of 346 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1022–30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Tauchmanovà L, Pivonello R, Di Somma C, Rossi R, De Martino MC, Camera L, Klain M, Salvatore M, Lombardi G, Colao A. Bone demineralization and vertebral fractures in endogenous cortisol excess: role of disease etiology and gonadal status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(5):1779–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Feelders RA, Hofland LJ. Medical treatment of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):425–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Colao A, Pivonello R, Spiezia S, Faggiano A, Ferone D, Filippella M, Marzullo P, Cerbone G, Siciliani M, Lombardi G. Persistence of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with Cushing’s disease after five years of successful cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2664–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Spiezia S, De Martino MC, Filippella M, Di Somma C, Lombardi G, Colao A. Cardiovascular risk factors and common carotid artery caliber and stiffness in patients with Cushing’s disease during active disease and 1 year after disease remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2527–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Mancini T, Kola B, Mantero F, Boscaro M, Arnaldi G. High cardiovascular risk in patients with Cushing’s syndrome according to 1999 WHO/ISH guidelines. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;61(6):768–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros AL, Sosa E, Martinez N, Mercado M. Persistence of Cushing’s disease symptoms and comorbidities after surgical cure: a long-term, integral evaluation. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(2):252–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Terzolo M, Allasino B, Pia A, Peraga G, Daffara F, Laino F, Ardito A, Termine A, Paccotti P, Berchialla P, Migliaretti G, Reimondo G. Surgical remission of Cushing’s syndrome reduces cardiovascular risk. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(1):127–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Neary NM, Booker OJ, Abel BS, Matta JR, Muldoon N, Sinaii N, Pettigrew RI, Nieman LK, Gharib AM. Hypercortisolism is associated with increased coronary arterial atherosclerosis: analysis of noninvasive coronary angiography using multidetector computerized tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):2045–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. van Zaane B, Nur E, Squizzato A, Dekkers OM, Twickler MT, Fliers E, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Brandjes DP. Hypercoagulable state in Cushing’s syndrome: a systematic review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2743–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Kastelan D, Dusek T, Kraljevic I, Aganovic I. Hypercoagulable state in Cushing’s syndrome is reversible following remission. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;78(1):102–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Ferraù F, Korbonits M. Metabolic comorbidities in Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M133–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Geer EB, Shen W, Strohmayer E, Post KD, Freda PU. Body composition and cardiovascular risk markers after remission of Cushing’s disease: a prospective study using whole-body MRI. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(5):1702–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Ragnarsson O, Glad CA, Bergthorsdottir R, Almqvist EG, Ekerstad E, Widell H, Wängberg B, Johannsson G. Body composition and bone mineral density in women with Cushing’s syndrome in remission and the association with common genetic variants influencing glucocorticoid sensitivity. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(1):1–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Greenman Y. Management of dyslipidemia in Cushing’s syndrome. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;92 Suppl 1:91–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Ragnarsson O, Johannsson G. Cushing’s syndrome: a structured short- and long-term management plan for patients in remission. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(5):R139–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Trementino L, Appolloni G, Ceccoli L, Marcelli G, Concettoni C, Boscaro M, Arnaldi G. Bone complications in patients with Cushing’s syndrome: looking for clinical, biochemical, and genetic determinants. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(3):913–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Mazziotti G, Delgado A, Maffezzoni F, Formenti A, Giustina A. Skeletal fragility in endogenous hypercortisolism. Front Horm Res. 2016;46:66–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Vestergaard P, Lindholm J, Jørgensen JO, Hagen C, Hoeck HC, Laurberg P, Rejnmark L, Brixen K, Kristensen LØ, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Mosekilde L. Increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(1):51–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Andela CD, van Haalen FM, Ragnarsson O, Papakokkinou E, Johannsson G, Santos A, Webb SM, Biermasz NR, van der Wee NJ, Pereira AM. Cushing’s syndrome causes irreversible effects on the human brain: a systematic review of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(1):R1–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  166. Langenecker SA, Weisenbach SL, Giordani B, Briceño EM, Guidotti Breting LM, Schallmo MP, Leon HM, Noll DC, Zubieta JK, Schteingart DE, Starkman MN. Impact of chronic hypercortisolemia on affective processing. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(1):217–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Tiemensma J, Biermasz NR, Middelkoop HA, van der Mast RC, Romijn JA, Pereira AM. Increased prevalence of psychopathology and maladaptive personality traits after long-term cure of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):E129–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Pekic S, Stojanovic M, Popovic V. Contemporary issues in the evaluation and management of pituitary adenomas. Minerva Endocrinol. 2015;40(4):307–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Maiter D, Delgrange E. Therapy of endocrine disease: the challenges in managing giant prolactinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(6):R213–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  170. Orphanet. Prolactinoma. Available at www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?Expert=2965. Last updated February 2014. Accessed 14 Oct 2015.
  171. Colao A. Pituitary tumours: the prolactinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23(5):575–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Tjörnstrand A, Gunnarsson K, Evert M, Holmberg E, Ragnarsson O, Rosén T, Filipsson NH. The incidence rate of pituitary adenomas in western Sweden for the period 2001–2011. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(4):519–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Raappana A, Koivukangas J, Ebeling T, Pirilä T. Incidence of pituitary adenomas in Northern Finland in 1992–2007. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4268–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A. High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(12):4769–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Ciccarelli A, Daly AF, Beckers A. The epidemiology of prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2005;8(1):3–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lombardi G, Colao A. Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(5):485–534.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Klibanski A. Clinical practice. Prolactinomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1219–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Schlechte JA. Clinical practice. Prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):2035–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Casanueva FF, Molitch ME, Schlechte JA, Abs R, Bonert V, Bronstein MD, Brue T, Cappabianca P, Colao A, Fahlbusch R, Fideleff H, Hadani M, Kelly P, Kleinberg D, Laws E, Marek J, Scanlon M, Sobrinho LG, Wass JA, Giustina A. Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the Diagnosis and Management of Prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65(2):265–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Brue T, Delemer B, French Society of Endocrinology (SFE) work group on the consensus on hyperprolactinemia. Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: expert consensus – French Society of Endocrinology. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2007;68(1):58–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Vilar L, Freitas MC, Naves LA, Casulari LA, Azevedo M, Montenegro Jr R, Barros AI, Faria M, Nascimento GC, Lima JG, Nóbrega LH, Cruz TP, Mota A, Ramos A, Violante A, Lamounier Filho A, Gadelha MR, Czepielewski MA, Glezer A, Bronstein MD. Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: results of a Brazilian multicentre study with 1234 patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31(5):436–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Vilar L, Fleseriu M, Bronstein MD. Challenges and pitfalls in the diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2014;58(1):9–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  183. Vance ML, Thorner MO. Prolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1987;16(3):731–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Kleinberg DL, Noel GL, Frantz AG. Galactorrhea: a study of 235 cases, including 48 with pituitary tumors. N Engl J Med. 1977;296(11):589–600.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  185. Molitch ME, Reichlin S. Hyperprolactinemic disorders. Dis Mon. 1982;28(9):1–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  186. Kawaguchi T, Ogawa Y, Tominaga T. Diagnostic pitfalls of hyperprolactinemia: the importance of sequential pituitary imaging. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:555.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  187. Andreeva M, Georgiev T, Bosadjieva E, Karagiosov L, Karagiosov K, Tomova A, Matrosov P, Kirilov G, Diankov L, Christova T. A clinicomorphological study of pituitary tumors associated with the clinical syndrome of acromegaly. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1991;98(3):223–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  188. Honbo KS, Herle AJV, Kellett KA. Serum prolactin levels in untreated primary hypothyroidism. Am J Med. 1978;64(5):782–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  189. Hekimsoy Z, Kafesçiler S, Güçlü F, Ozmen B. The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia in overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. Endocr J. 2010;57(12):1011–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  190. Hou SH, Grossman S, Molitch ME. Hyperprolactinemia in patients with renal insufficiency and chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis or chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1985;6(4):245–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  191. Lim VS, Kathpalia SC, Frohman LA. Hyperprolactinemia and impaired pituitary response to suppression and stimulation in chronic renal failure: reversal after transplantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;48(1):101–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  192. Stanisic TH, Donovan J. Prolactin secreting renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1986;136(1):85–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Hoffman WH, Gala RR, Kovacs K, Subramanian MG. Ectopic prolactin secretion from a gonadoblastoma. Cancer. 1987;60(11):2690–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  194. Hsu CT, Yu MH, Lee CY, Jong HL, Yeh MY. Ectopic production of prolactin in uterine cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;44(2):166–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  195. Arbaiza D, Noriega K, Marcial J, Wachtel A, Perez C, Torres CF. Ectopic production of prolactin in an infant with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;32(4):311–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  196. Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Chikhlikar PR, Shah NG, Vora HH, Ghosh N, Trivedi TI. Ectopic production of prolactin by colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):119–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  197. Melmed S, Kleinberg D. Anterior pituitary. In: Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, editors. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 185–261.Google Scholar
  198. Kearns AE, Goff DC, Hayden DL, Daniels GH. Risperidone-associated hyperprolactinemia. Endocr Pract. 2000;6(6):425–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  199. Robinson OP. Metoclopramide – side effects and safety. Postgrad Med J. 1973;49 Suppl 4:77–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Petit A, Piednoir D, Germain ML, Trenque T. Drug-induced hyperprolactinemia: a case–non-case study from the national pharmacovigilance database. Therapie. 2003;58(2):159–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  201. Molitch ME. Drugs and prolactin. Pituitary. 2008;11(2):209–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  202. Vallette-Kasic S, Morange-Ramos I, Selim A, Gunz G, Morange S, Enjalbert A, Martin PM, Jaquet P, Brue T. Macroprolactinemia revisited: a study on 106 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):581–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  203. Whittaker PG, Wilcox T, Lind T. Maintained fertility in a patient with hyperprolactinemia due to big, big prolactin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;53(4):863–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  204. Leite V, Cosby H, Sobrinho LG, Fresnoza MA, Santos MA, Friesen HG. Characterization of big, big prolactin in patients with hyperprolactinemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;37(4):365–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  205. Smith TP, Suliman AM, Fahie-Wilson MN, McKenna TJ. Gross variability in the detection of prolactin in sera containing big big prolactin (macroprolactin) by commercial immunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(12):5410–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  206. Mazziotti G, Porcelli T, Mormando M, De Menis E, Bianchi A, Mejia C, Mancini T, De Marinis L, Giustina A. Vertebral fractures in males with prolactinoma. Endocrine. 2011;39(3):288–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  207. Mazziotti G, Mancini T, Mormando M, De Menis E, Bianchi A, Doga M, Porcelli T, Vescovi PP, De Marinis L, Giustina A. High prevalence of radiological vertebral fractures in women with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2011;14(4):299–306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  208. Schlechte J, el-Khoury G, Kathol M, Walkner L. Forearm and vertebral bone mineral in treated and untreated hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64(5):1021–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  209. Ferrari C, Paracchi A, Mattei AM, de Vincentiis S, D’Alberton A, Crosignani P. Cabergoline in the long-term therapy of hyperprolactinemic disorders. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1992;126(6):489–94.Google Scholar
  210. Colao A, Vitale G, Cappabianca P, Briganti F, Ciccarelli A, De Rosa M, Zarrilli S, Lombardi G. Outcome of cabergoline treatment in men with prolactinoma: effects of a 24-month treatment on prolactin levels, tumor mass, recovery of pituitary function, and semen analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(4):1704–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  211. Molitch ME. Endocrinology in pregnancy: management of the pregnant patient with a prolactinoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(5):R205–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  212. Glezer A, Bronstein MD. Prolactinomas, cabergoline, and pregnancy. Endocrine. 2014;47:64–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  213. Molitch ME. Prolactinoma in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(6):885–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  214. Bernabeu I, Casanueva FF. Metabolic syndrome associated with hyperprolactinemia: a new indication for dopamine agonist treatment? Endocrine. 2013;44(2):273–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  215. Auriemma RS, Granieri L, Galdiero M, Simeoli C, Perone Y, Vitale P, Pivonello C, Negri M, Mannarino T, Giordano C, Gasperi M, Colao A, Pivonello R. Effect of cabergoline on metabolism in prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2013;98(4):299–310.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  216. Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Vitale P, Granieri L, Lo Calzo F, Salzano C, Ferreri L, Pivonello C, Cariati F, Coppola G, de Angelis C, Colao A, Pivonello R. Effect of chronic cabergoline treatment and testosterone replacement on metabolism in male patients with prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101(1):66–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  217. Ónnestam L, Berinder K, Burman P, Dahlqvist P, Engström BE, Wahlberg J, Nyström HF. National incidence and prevalence of TSH-secreting pituitary adenomas in Sweden. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):626–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  218. Beck-Peccoz P, Brucker-Davis F, Persani L, Smallridge RC, Weintraub BD. Thyrotropin-secreting pituitary tumors. Endocr Rev. 1996;17(6):610–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Thyrotroph adenomas. In: Thapar K, Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW, Lloyd RV, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Tumors. Totowa: Humana Press; 2001. p. 333–42.Google Scholar
  220. Beck-Peccoz P, Lania A, Beckers A, Chatterjee K, Wemeau JL. 2013 European thyroid association guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyrotropin-secreting pituitary tumors. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2(2):76–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  221. Salvatore D, Davies TF, Schlumberger M-J, Hay ID, Larsen PR. Thyroid physiology and diagnostic evaluation of patients with thyroid disorders. Chapter 11. In: Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, editors. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 327.Google Scholar
  222. Miller A, Doll H, David J, Wass J. Impact of musculoskeletal disease on quality of life in long-standing acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158(5):587–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  223. Damjanovic SS, Neskovic AN, Petakov MS, Popovic V, Vujisic B, Petrovic M, Nikolic-Djurovic M, Simic M, Pekic S, Marinkovic J. High output heart failure in patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly. Am J Med. 2002;112(8):610–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  224. Berg C, Petersenn S, Lahner H, Herrmann BL, Buchfelder M, Droste M, Stalla GK, Strasburger CJ, Roggenbuck U, Lehmann N, Moebus S, Jöckel KH, Möhlenkamp S, Erbel R, Saller B, Mann K, Investigative Group of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study and the German Pegvisomant Observational Study Board and Investigators. Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with uncontrolled and long-term acromegaly: comparison with matched data from the general population and the effect of disease control. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3648–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  225. van der Klaauw AA, Bax JJ, Roelfsema F, Bleeker GB, Holman ER, Corssmit EP, van der Wall EE, Smit JW, Romijn JA, Pereira AM. Uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with progressive mitral valvular regurgitation. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2006;16(2):101–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  226. Grynberg M, Salenave S, Young J, Chanson P. Female gonadal function before and after treatment of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):4518–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  227. Anagnostis P, Efstathiadou ZA, Polyzos SA, Adamidou F, Slavakis A, Sapranidis M, Litsas ID, Katergari S, Selalmatzidou D, Kita M. Acromegaly: presentation, morbidity and treatment outcomes at a single centre. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(8):896–902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  228. Bogazzi F, Battolla L, Spinelli C, Rossi G, Gavioli S, Di Bello V, Cosci C, Sardella C, Volterrani D, Talini E, Pepe P, Falaschi F, Mariani G, Martino E. Risk factors for development of coronary heart disease in patients with acromegaly: a five-year prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(11):4271–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  229. Celik O, Hatipoglu E, Akhan SE, Uludag S, Kadioglu P. Acromegaly is associated with higher frequency of female sexual dysfunction: experience of a single center. Endocr J. 2013;60(6):753–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  230. Cannavò S, Condurso R, Ragonese M, Ferraù F, Alibrandi A, Aricò I, Romanello G, Squadrito S, Trimarchi F, Silvestri R. Increased prevalence of restless legs syndrome in patients with acromegaly and effects on quality of life assessed by Acro-QoL. Pituitary. 2011;14(4):328–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  231. Montini M, Gianola D, Pagani MD, Pedroncelli A, Caldara R, Gherardi F, Bonelli M, Lancranjan I, Pagani G. Cholelithiasis and acromegaly: therapeutic strategies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(3):401–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  232. Schmid C, Goede DL, Hauser RS, Brändle M. Increased prevalence of high Body Mass Index in patients presenting with pituitary tumours: severe obesity in patients with macroprolactinoma. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136(15–16):254–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  233. Renehan AG, Bhaskar P, Painter JE, O’Dwyer ST, Haboubi N, Varma J, Ball SG, Shalet SM. The prevalence and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3417–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  234. Bogazzi F, Cosci C, Sardella C, Costa A, Manetti L, Gasperi M, Rossi G, Bartalena L, Martino E. Identification of acromegalic patients at risk of developing colonic adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(4):1351–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  235. Feelders RA, Pulgar SJ, Kempel A, Pereira AM. The burden of Cushing’s disease: clinical and health-related quality of life aspects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167(3):311–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  236. Albiger NM, Occhi G, Sanguin F, Iacobone M, Casarrubea G, Ferasin S, Mantero F, Scaroni C. Adrenal nodules in patients with Cushing’s disease: prevalence, clinical significance and follow-up. J Endocrinol Invest. 2011;34(8):e204–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  237. Invitti C, Manfrini R, Romanini BM, Cavagnini F. High prevalence of nodular thyroid disease in patients with Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;43(3):359–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016