Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hereditary angioedema in Spain: medical care and patient journey

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 19, Article number: 210 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a genetic rare disease characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria. The characteristics of the disease have a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the patient journey of HAE in Spain.

Methods

A multidisciplinary committee of 16 HAE experts (allergy, immunology, emergency department, hospital pharmacy and nursing) and 3 representatives of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AEDAF) who were patients or caregivers participated in the study. A review of the publications on HAE treatment was performed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to HAE experts, patients, or caregivers. Three meetings with the experts, patients and caregivers were held to share, discuss, and validate data obtained from literature and interviews and to build the model.

Results

Throughout the project, the patient journey has been drawn up, dividing it into the stages of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment/follow-up. Some areas for improvement have been identified. Firstly, there is a need to enhance awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, with a particular emphasis on primary care and emergency department personnel. Secondly, efforts should be made to minimize patient referral times to allergy/immunology specialists, ensuring timely access to appropriate care. Thirdly, it is crucial to encourage the study of the relatives of diagnosed patients to early identify potential cases. Fourthly, equitable access to self-administered treatments should be ensured, facilitated by systems that enable medication delivery at home and proper education and training for patients. Equitable access to long-term prophylactic treatment should also be prioritized for all patients in need. To standardize HAE management, the development of consensus guidelines that reduce variability in clinical practice is essential. Lastly, promoting research studies to enhance knowledge of the disease and align its treatment with new developments in the healthcare field should be encouraged.

Conclusions

The knowledge of the patient journey in HAE allowed us to identify improvement areas with the final aim to optimize the disease management.

Introduction

Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by mutations in the SERPING1 gene that encodes for C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) [1]. Its main form is type 1, characterized by a quantitative deficiency of C1INH [1].

It is a rare disease, of which its exact prevalence is unknown. In a systematic review of epidemiological studies published in 2018, its prevalence was estimated between 1.1 and 1.6 cases per 100,000 population [2]. One study analysed the disease prevalence in Spain with data collected between 2003 and 2004, calculating a minimum prevalence for HAE-C1INH of 1.09 per 100,000 population [3].

The clinical expression of HAE-C1INH is characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria [1, 4,5,6]. These acute attacks can appear in different locations (peripheral, abdominal, cervicofacial and upper respiratory tract oedemas) and resolve spontaneously within 2–5 days [1, 5, 6]. The frequency and severity of episodes vary greatly between patients, even when they are from the same family and share the same genetic mutation, and also in the same individual during the different life stages [1]. This wide heterogeneity makes it difficult to diagnose and manage [7, 8].

The diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) is based on clinical suspicion and the existence of a family history, and requires confirmation through the complement study (C4, C1q, C1 inhibitor, and functional C1 inhibitor) and the SERPING1 gene study [8, 9]. Treatment of HAE-C1INH has evolved in recent years, and currently focuses on three therapeutic strategies that aim to prevent the onset of oedema, its progression, and morbidity and mortality: on-demand treatment of the acute attack, short-term prophylaxis (STP) and long-term prophylaxis (LTP) [5, 8, 10,11,12].

The characteristics of the disease (unpredictability of attacks and their severity, risk of asphyxia, need for urgent care, the hereditary nature of the disease and concerns about transmission to offspring, difficulty in accessing specific treatments and the adverse effects of a number of them) produce a high impact on the quality of life (QoL) [13]. Furthermore, its low prevalence and heterogeneity and the lack of awareness of the disease among healthcare professionals are associated with underdiagnosis, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis [14].

In this context, this study was developed with the aim of understanding the typical journey of a patient with HAE-C1INH in Spain, and the different profiles and clinical situations that may be encountered, and experienced in the different stages of the disease, in order to increase awareness about patients with this disease and improve its treatment.

Methodology

An independent external consulting team from Ascendo Consulting Sanidad & Farma was in charge of coordinating and energizing all phases of the study. A multidisciplinary committee of experts composed of 16 professionals from different specialties with extensive experience in the treatment of HAE in Spain: allergy, immunology, emergency departments (ED), hospital pharmacy and nursing, as well as three representatives of the Spanish Patient Association of Hereditary Angioedema (AEDAF), who are themselves patients or caregivers, participated in the study. The panel represented different geographical areas of Spain with different health care systems.

The methodology employed consisted of: (1) a review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of HAE-C1INH through PubMed; (2) individual interviews with each of the members of the multidisciplinary committee using different semi-structured questionnaires for each profile, in order to supplement any information not available in literature sources and include their clinical experience; and (3) meetings with the entire multidisciplinary committee, including representatives of patients and caregivers, aimed at sharing, discussing and validating the conclusions obtained from the literature review and individual interviews. All the results expressed in the present study were approved with a minimum of 80% consensus among the panel of experts.

Results

The expert surveys showed a high variability in the HAE-C1INH patient journey. Several teleconferences were held to discuss the results of the surveys and the literature review and build the HAE-C1INH patient journey. In those cases where there was a high variability or there were no published data, the experts were specifically asked to reach a consensus.

The HAE-C1INH patient journey was structured in three phases: pre-diagnostic phase; diagnostic phase; and treatment/follow-up phase after diagnosis.

The findings for each of these phases are shown below.

Pre-diagnostic phase

HAE is an underdiagnosed disease in which the symptoms are often similar to other more common diseases and, as such, are not recognized as typical of the disorder [15]. Accordingly, diagnosis is usually late, although delays have decreased in recent years due to growing knowledge of the disease among healthcare professionals [15].

The diagnosis delay in Spain in different studies can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1 Mean diagnostic delay in HAE-C1INH in Spain
Full size table

According to Lunn et al. HAE-C1INH, patients attended an average of 4.4 different departments or clinics before receiving a correct diagnosis in a patient survey in the USA [18]. This was confirmed later in Japan by Iwamoto et al. that found that only 12% of patients were diagnosed with HAE at the first medical institution that they visited, and they attended an average of 4.6 ± 4.6 different areas of specialty before HAE diagnosis [19].

Figure 1 illustrates the journey of the patient who presents repeated angioedema (AE) episodes before HAE-C1INH is diagnosed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient journey: Pre-diagnostic phase. AE: angioedema; ICU: intensive care unit

Full size image

Participants in this study identified several critical points and issues at this stage of the patient journey that may contribute to underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of the disease, which are detailed below.

In relation to the number of attacks experienced by patients until diagnosis, the experts noted that they visit hospital EDs or primary care (PC) on repeated occasions until diagnostic confirmation, although this number is difficult to specify since it depends on the patient, the hospital or health care centre he or she attends, and the familiarity of the treating healthcare professional with the disease. Furthermore, in many cases, in the event of a mild-moderate attack, the patient might not go to the hospital ED or PC urgent care [20], remaining at home until symptoms have subsided, so the number of attacks the patient experiences before being diagnosed could be higher than that recorded.

After treatment of an acute attack in the hospital ED or PC, the patient may not be referred to any hospital department. Referral by the ED to allergy/immunology services is not always direct, and the patient is often referred to other departments such as gastroenterology, dermatology, otolaryngology (ear, nose and throat, ENT) or internal medicine. This results in a delay in diagnosis, as well as unnecessary consultations and interventions.

Patient care by allergy/immunology specialists is critical to the diagnosis of HAE. The time to diagnosis is highly variable and, in many cases, very long (an average of 8 years), although this period is longer in the case of hospitals that do not have allergy/immunology departments.

Overall, it was noted that a lack of knowledge about the disease among healthcare professionals seeing these patients results in an unduly long time for referral to allergy/immunology services and, consequently, in a delay in diagnosis.

Diagnosis of the patient with HAE-C1INH

The diagnosis of HAE-C1INH in Spain is generally made by allergy specialists and, in some cases, by immunology specialists. It is based on clinical suspicion in the presence of recurrent and transient episodes of cutaneous AE, abdominal pain and/or upper respiratory tract oedema that do not respond to H1 antihistamines, corticosteroids or adrenaline, along with a family history of AE. However, up to 25% of the SERPING1 gene are de novo mutations and there may be no family history [9]. The diagnosis of HAE-C1INH must be confirmed with laboratory tests. The variability and heterogeneity of the disease make it difficult to confirm the diagnosis, although once the patient is treated by the allergy or immunology department, the time to diagnosis decreases [6]. Figure 2 shows the journey of a patient during the diagnostic phase and details the tests that are generally performed, as defined by the experts.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patient journey: Diagnostic phase. C1q: complement component C1q; C4: complement component 4; C1INHf: C1-inhibitor function; C1INHc: C1-inhibitor concentration

Full size image

Experts agreed that referral times are critical to the early diagnosis of HAE-C1INH. In this regard, the delay may be higher in regional hospitals. The tests performed for diagnostic confirmation are similar throughout Spain, although there is greater variability in the case of the genetic study since it is not performed in all hospitals, which could lead to delays in the diagnosis of family members when C1INH results are doubtful.

Treatment of the patient diagnosed with HAE-C1INH

In recent years, new therapeutic alternatives have emerged for the management of patients with HAE. Pharmacological treatment is currently based on a three-pronged approach: controlling AE attacks (on-demand treatment); preventing the onset of AE attacks with LTP; and preventing the onset of AE in risk situations such as surgical or medical procedures or other stressful situations for the patient with STP [5, 8, 10, 11].

The therapeutic strategy is established according to each patient’s condition and will be modified according to the patient’s response and needs at all times. The HAE-C1INH patient journey during the treatment phase has been defined in Fig. 3, detailing each of the mentioned alternatives.

Regarding treatment availability in Spain, HAE-C1INH patients have access to the HAE-C1INH specific drugs through the public hospitals, which fund the drug through their budget.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Patient journey: Treatment phase. LTP: long-term prophylaxis; SC: subcutaneous; IV: intravenous; pdC1INH: plasma-derived C1-inhibitor concentrate

Full size image

During this phase of HAE-C1INH treatment, and taking into account the three therapeutic approaches, the experts identified a number of critical points and issues regarding patient management.

Due to the characteristics of the disease, the availability of medication in the patient’s home for self-administration is an increasingly widespread practice that is recommended by guidelines and specialists.

Despite having medication at home, patients sometimes go to a PC centre to have it administered by a healthcare professional, although not all centres provide this service. Self-administration will therefore depends on the patient him- or herself and on the training provided in the hospital.

Lastly, there remain patients who are difficult to control with the current drugs available for HAE-C1INH treatment.

Additionally, the use of telepharmacy programmes has expanded in Spain, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is common for patients with HAE-C1INH to be included in such programmes, especially in the case of patients on LTP.

The journey of the patient experiencing an acute attack is presented taking into account the differences in terms of the severity of the attack and the location (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Patient journey: On-demand treatment phase. PC: primary care; URT: upper respiratory tract; ICU: intensive care unit; ENT: Ear, Nose and Throat

Full size image

After analysing the HAE-C1INH patient journey the experts identified three areas that generate delays in the healthcare process. Firstly, there are delays on the part of patients in attending primary care. Secondly, there are delays in referring patients from primary care to allergy/immunology departments and then to specialized centres. Finally, the time until obtaining a diagnosis and starting treatment can be optimized.

The experts highlighted the key aspects that should be promoted to optimize the approach to HAE-C1INH.

  1. 1.

    Improve awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, particularly in PC and the ED, as well as in society as a whole.

  2. 2.

    Reduce patient referral times to allergy/immunology.

  3. 3.

    Encourage the conduct of screening studies among the relatives of diagnosed patients.

  4. 4.

    Promote the need for treatment of all acute attacks, both among healthcare professionals and among patients.

  5. 5.

    Ensure equity in the self-administration of treatments for all patients, through systems that facilitate access to medication at home and proper education and training.

  6. 6.

    Ensure equity in access to LTP treatment for all patients who require it.

  7. 7.

    Develop Spanish multidisciplinary consensus that specify the main routes of patient entry and appropriate referral criteria help to reduce variability in HAE-C1INH management in clinical practice.

  8. 8.

    Promote studies that help to increase knowledge of the disease and improve its treatment in accordance with new developments.

  9. 9.

    Promote the collection of data in national registries, generating a greater understanding of the disease and its potential approach.

Discussion

This is the first study that describes the HAE-C1INH patient journey in Spain. Only a few studies on the patient journey in HAE have been published. The first study was published in 2016 [20] and was performed by a panel of 12 HAE experts and HAE patients from different countries worldwide. The approach was similar to that used in this study and they also identified three stages (1) onset of symptoms and initial evaluation (prediagnostic phase), (2) referral and diagnosis (diagnostic phase), and (3) management of HAE (treatment phase and follow-up). Another study performed in Germany was published in 2020 [21]. They developed a survey that was answered by 81 HAE patients. Finally, a study performed in Mexico has recently been published [22]. In this study, the authors also developed a survey that was answered by 17 HAE patients. In these two last studies, no phases were described in the patient journey.

HAE-C1INH is an underdiagnosed disease with a delayed diagnosis due to the similarity of its symptoms with more common conditions and other factors, such as a lack of awareness on the part of healthcare professionals. Although the time to diagnosis has been reduced in recent years, largely because awareness of the disease has improved, it remains variable and is often longer than desirable, and depends on each patient (number of attacks, location of attack, assigned referral hospital, etc.) [3, 17, 21, 23,24,25]. Allergy/immunology referral times are considered essential to facilitating early diagnosis of the disease. At present, despite becoming less common, erroneous referrals and unnecessary interventions continue to occur, thus contributing to delayed diagnosis and inadequate patient treatment.

When a series of recurrent AE attacks and the existence of a family history led to suspicion of the disorder, the diagnosis is confirmed by specific laboratory tests. To promote early diagnosis, training on the disease and a push to perform genetic studies have been two of the measures proposed by the experts. The Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC) created in 2007 a group of physicians interested in bradykinergic angioedema (GEAB) who developed the first Spanish consensus on bradykinergic angioedema [9, 26]. The Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI by its acronym in Spanish) also formed a group interested in hereditary angioedema (SHINE by its acronym in Spanish) [27]. In addition, EDs are strategic places for the detection and treatment of this disorder; in Spain, the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) has a specific AE working group with the aim, among others, of training and disseminating knowledge about the disease [28].

Despite guideline and consensus recommendations, real-world clinical practice varies greatly in terms of the management of acute attacks, depending on the patient and the situation. The experts emphasized that the availability of medication in the patient’s home for self-administration is considered essential as any attack can be treated quicker and more effectively, thus improving patient QoL and disease management [5, 8, 10, 11, 26]. In this respect, the experts found that the possibility of HAE patients keeping medication at home varied widely among the different regions and hospitals in Spain, which was confirmed in a survey performed by AEDAF [29].

Another key aspect highlighted by experts was the possibility of self-administration of HAE-C1INH treatments, requiring the patient to keep medication at home. Self-administration allows attacks to be treated quickly, reducing the severity and duration of symptoms, the need for higher treatment doses, and the number of visits to health centres. It also promotes patient autonomy, improving their QoL, and is associated with a reduction in costs, especially in patients who are in areas far from healthcare centres. It is a recommended and increasingly widespread practice in Spain [9, 26, 30] although it is not provided by all centres [29]. Home medication is one of the main demands of patients and healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of HAE-C1INH. Differences in availability to patients vary depending on the healthcare professional, their knowledge of disease management and the healthcare facility (PC, tertiary level hospital ED, regional hospital ED) in which they are located. Self-administration involves training patients and, furthermore, requires their involvement. The publication of an updated national consensus on the management of HAE-C1INH could be of help to increase the number of HAE-C1INH patients having enough medication at home and being able to self-administer the treatment.

Indications on when to treat an acute attack have changed over the course of the different consensuses and guidelines on HAE-C1INH [4, 10, 12, 26, 31,32,33,34,35]. The 2021/2022 International World Allergy Organization/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (WAO/EAACI) Guideline recommends considering all AE attacks for on-demand treatment, regardless of location, and treating them as early as possible [11]. In the HAE-C1INH patient journey in Spain, many patients do not treat every attack, despite guidelines recommendations. In addition, the International Canadian HAE Guideline [10] states that effective therapies should be used for the acute treatment of AE attacks to reduce their duration and severity. In this HAE-C1INH patient journey in Spain, effective and specific treatments are used for on-demand treatment of angioedema attacks.

For acute attacks with upper respiratory tract involvement, early treatment is critical. For this type of attack, patients are advised to go to the ED after administering medication at home for both monitoring and, if necessary, further treatment [10, 11]. In these cases, medical monitoring is essential to reduce the risk of asphyxia [11, 26]. Nevertheless, despite the recommendations, the experts said that not all patients attend the ED when they present upper respiratory tract involvement.

Moreover, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) could happen in the case of patients with life-threatening upper respiratory tract involvement, although the experts noted that it has become much less frequent in recent years due to a better understanding of the disease, the identification of patients and new treatments.

Management of the disease has changed in recent years due to the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives that represent an improvement in the approach to patients with HAE. Specifically, the emergence of effective and safe treatments indicated for LTP has led to a paradigm shift in disease management, with the main goals being reaching total control of the disease and normalizing patient life [11]. LTP prescriptions in Spain vary depending on the healthcare professional and the centre in which they practice, and are largely subject to knowledge about the disease, its management and the difficulty of access to treatment due to its high cost. A Spanish consensus on a Treat to Target oriented management of HAE has recently been published [36] and could help to improve the care of HAE-C1INH patients.

The studies in real life and the use of registries could be of great aid in the management of HAE. Different HAE centres in Spain participate in the Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) and thus some characteristics of the management of HAE in Spain have been published [3, 30].

The development of new drugs for HAE is a hope for those patients who are difficult to control with the current available drugs [37].

However, as a result of the improved understanding of HAE and new treatments, the management and, therefore, the prognosis are getting better.

The main strength of this study is that it was done by a multidisciplinary team of experts involved in HAE-C1INH diagnosis and management (physicians, pharmacists, nurses), patients, and caregivers. One of the main limitations of our study is the current variability in clinical practice, which depends on the healthcare professional, the specific characteristics of each patient, and the area and hospital to which they belong. This makes it difficult to establish a detailed and homogeneous care pathway for all patients with HAE-C1INH.

Conclusions

The literature on HAE-C1INH is sparse, largely because it is a rare and poorly understood disease. In this study, in which healthcare professionals of different profiles with experience in the management of patients with HAE-C1INH and the patients themselves participated, the HAE-C1INH patient journey has been detailed at each of the stages of the care pathway, highlighting those key points that could help to improve management of the disease. Moreover, the geographical distribution and the representation of both larger and smaller hospitals in this project afford the study a good perspective of the situation of HAE-C1INH management in Spain.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Caballero T, Pedrosa M, Gómez C. Hereditary Angioedema. Med Clin (Barc). 2015;145(8):356–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aygören-Pürsün E, Magerl M, Maetzel A, Maurer M. Epidemiology of bradykinin-mediated angioedema: a systematic investigation of epidemiological studies. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Roche O, Blanch A, Caballero T, Sastre N, Callejo D, López-Trascasa M. Hereditary Angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency: patient registry and approach to the prevalence in Spain. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94(4):498–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cicardi M, Aberer W, Banerji A, Bas M, Bernstein JA, Bork K, et al. Classification, diagnosis, and approach to treatment for angioedema: consensus report from the Hereditary Angioedema International Working Group. Allergy. 2014;69(5):602–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caballero T. Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2021;31(1):1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busse PJ, Christiansen SC. Hereditary Angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1136–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeza ML, Caballero Molina T, Crespo Diz C, González Q, Guilarte Clavero M, Hernández Fernández de Rojas D, et al. Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema as a tool for management. Farm Hosp. 2013;37(6):521–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caballero T, Cabañas R, Pedrosa M. Medical algorithm: management of C1 inhibitor hereditary angioedema. Allergy. 2022;77(3):1060–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caballero T, Baeza ML, Cabañas R, Campos A, Cimbollek S, Gómez-Traseira C, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part I. classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, genetics, clinical symptoms, and diagnosis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(5):333–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Betschel S, Badiou J, Binkley K, Borici-Mazi R, Hébert J, Kanani A, et al. The International/Canadian Hereditary Angioedema Guideline. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019;15:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Maurer M, Magerl M, Betschel S, Aberer W, Ansotegui IJ, Aygören-Pürsün E, et al. The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema-the 2021 revision and update. Allergy. 2022;77(7):1961–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Branco Ferreira M, Baeza ML, Spínola Santos A, Prieto-García A, Leal R, Alvarez J, Caballero T. Evolution of guidelines for the management of Hereditary Angioedema due to C1 inhibitor Deficiency. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023;33(5):332–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caballero T, Prior N. Burden of illness and quality-of-life measures in Angioedema conditions. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017;37(3):597–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zanichelli A, Longhurst HJ, Maurer M, Bouillet L, Aberer W, Fabien V, et al. Misdiagnosis trends in patients with hereditary angioedema from the real-world clinical setting. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117(4):394–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernstein JA. Severity of hereditary angioedema, prevalence, and diagnostic considerations. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(14 Suppl):S292–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Caballero T, Aygören-Pürsün E, Bygum A, Beusterien K, Hautamaki E, Sisic Z, et al. The humanistic burden of hereditary angioedema: results from the Burden of Illness Study in Europe. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014;35(1):47–53.

  17. Gómez-Traseira C, Pérez-Fernández E, López-Serrano MC, García-Ara MC, Pedrosa M, López-Trascasa M, Caballero T. Clinical pattern and Acute and Long-Term Management of Hereditary Angioedema due to C1-Esterase inhibitor Deficiency. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(5):358–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunn ML, Santos CB, Craig TJ. Is there a need for clinical guidelines in the United States for the diagnosis of hereditary angioedema and the screening of family members of affected patients? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104(3):211–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iwamoto K, Yamamoto B, Ohsawa I, Honda D, Horiuchi T, Tanaka A, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema patients in Japan: a patient reported outcome survey. Allergol Int. 2021;70(2):235–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerji A, Baş M, Bernstein JA, Boccon-Gibod I, Bova M, Dempster J, et al. Expert perspectives on hereditary angioedema: key areas for advancements in care across the patient journey. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2016;7(3):172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zarnowski J, Rabe M, Kage P, Simon JC, Treudler R. Prophylactic treatment in Hereditary Angioedema is Associated with reduced anxiety in patients in Leipzig, Germany. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(9):819–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vargas Camaño ME, Buendía López YO, Garcés Flores H, Guzmán Vázquez S. Hereditary Angioedema: patient journey approach in Mexico. Rev Alerg Mex. 2023;70(4):121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zanichelli A, Magerl M, Longhurst HJ, Aberer W, Caballero T, Bouillet L, et al. Improvement in diagnostic delays over time in patients with hereditary angioedema: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Magerl M, Gothe H, Krupka S, Lachmann A, Ohlmeier C. A Germany-wide survey study on the patient journey of patients with hereditary angioedema. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwamoto K, Yamamoto B, Ohsawa I, Honda D, Horiuchi T, Tanaka A, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema patients in Japan: a patient reported outcome survey. Allergology Int. 2021;70(2):235–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Caballero T, Baeza ML, Cabañas R, Campos A, Cimbollek S, Gómez-Traseira C, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part II. Treatment, follow-up, and special situations. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(6):422–41. quiz 42– 3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spanish Hereditary Angioedema NEtwork (SHINE). https://www.inmunologia.org/index.php/grupos-sei/grupo-angioedema-hereditario Last accessed 12/Dec/2023.

  28. SEMES. Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias. Grupo de trabajo de Angioedema. https://www.semes.org/gdt/angioedema/ Last accessed 12/Dec/2023.

  29. Encuesta sobre acceso y disponibilidad de medicamentos para AEH. https://angioedema-aedaf.haei.org/encuesta-sobre-acceso-y-disponibilidad-de-medicamentos-para-aeh/ Last accessed 12/Dec/2023.

  30. Guilarte M, Sala-Cunill A, Baeza ML, Cabañas R, Hernández MD, Ibañez E, et al. Hereditary Angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency: real-world experience from the Icatibant Outcome Survey in Spain. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Maurer M, Magerl M, Ansotegui I, Aygören-Pürsün E, Betschel S, Bork K, et al. The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema—the 2017 revision and update. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1575–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Craig T, Pürsün EA, Bork K, Bowen T, Boysen H, Farkas H, et al. WAO Guideline for the management of Hereditary Angioedema. World Allergy Organ J. 2012;5(12):182–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zuraw BL, Banerji A, Bernstein JA, Busse PJ, Christiansen SC, Davis-Lorton M, et al. US Hereditary Angioedema Association Medical Advisory Board 2013 recommendations for the management of hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1(5):458–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowen T, Cicardi M, Farkas H, Bork K, Longhurst HJ, Zuraw B, et al. 2010 International consensus algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Betschel S, Badiou J, Binkley K, Hébert J, Kanani A, Keith P, et al. Canadian hereditary angioedema guideline. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014;10(1):50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Caballero T, Lleonart-Bellfill R, Pedrosa M, Ferrer L, Guilarte M. Expert Review and Consensus on the treat-to-Target Management of Hereditary Angioedema: from scientific evidence to clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023;33(4):238–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Betschel SD, Banerji A, Busse PJ, Cohn DM, Magerl M. Hereditary Angioedema: a review of the current and evolving treatment landscape. J Allergy Clin Immunology: Pract. 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Throughout the project, there was the collaboration of an independent external consulting team from Ascendo Consulting Sanidad&Farma, in charge of coordinating and energizing all phases of the study.

Funding

The preparation of this study and report has been possible thanks to the collaboration of CSL Behring in external project consulting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Allergy department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

    Teresa Caballero

  2. Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain

    Teresa Caballero

  3. Biomedical Research Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER U754), Madrid, Spain

    Teresa Caballero

  4. Nursing department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

    Carmen Alonso

  5. Allergy department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

    María Luisa Baeza

  6. Biomedical Research Network on Rare Diseases U761 (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain

    María Luisa Baeza

  7. Allergy department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Madrid, Spain

    Krasimira Baynova

  8. Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain

    José Cabeza

  9. Market Access, CSL Behring, Barcelona, Spain

    Isabel Cortés

  10. Immunology department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain

    Danilo Escobar Oblitas

  11. Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain

    Danilo Escobar Oblitas

  12. Allergy department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

    Mar Guilarte

  13. Allergy department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain

    Alejandro Joral

  14. Allergy department, Hospital General Universitario Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain

    Jesús Jurado Palomo

  15. Allergy department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain

    María Ángeles Lara Jiménez

  16. Emergency department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

    Ana Martínez Virto

  17. Asociación Española De Angioedema Familiar, Torrelodones, Madrid, Spain

    Laura Medrano, Sara L. Smith Foltz & Carolina Zamora

  18. Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain

    Emilio Monte Boquet

  19. Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Santa María, Lleida, 25198, Spain

    Montserrat Navarro

  20. Nursing department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain

    Diego Pérez

  21. Nursing department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain

    María José Plá Martí

  22. Emergency department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, 29010, Spain

    Coral Suero

Authors
  1. Teresa Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Luisa Baeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Krasimira Baynova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. José Cabeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isabel Cortés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Danilo Escobar Oblitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mar Guilarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alejandro Joral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jesús Jurado Palomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. María Ángeles Lara Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ana Martínez Virto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Laura Medrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Emilio Monte Boquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Montserrat Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Diego Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. María José Plá Martí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Sara L. Smith Foltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Coral Suero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Carolina Zamora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TC, CA, MLB, KB, JC, IC, DEO, MG, AJ, JJP, MALJ, AMV, LM, EMB, MN, DP, MJPM, SLSF, CS, CZ participated equally in the study design, data collection, preparation of the patient journey and the definition of areas for improvement. IC participated in the design of the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Caballero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

TC has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by AEDAF, Astria, BioCryst, CSL Behring, IONIS, Kalvista, Novartis, Octapharma, Pharming, Pharvaris and Takeda; and is a researcher from the IdiPAZ program for promoting research activities. MLB has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by CSL Behring, Novartis, Leti, Takeda, BioCryst and Pharming NV. KB has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by CSL Behring, Takeda, Pharming and BioCryst. MG has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by BioCryst, CSL Behring, Novartis, Pharming, Pharvaris and Takeda; and is a researcher from the VHIR program for promoting research activities. JJP has the following conflict of interests: participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by CSL Behring. MALJ has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by GSK, Novartis, Behring, Takeda, Leti, Diater, Sanofi, ALK, Stallergenes, Bial, Allergy Therapeutics. AMV has the following conflict of interest: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by CSL Behring and Takeda. LM has the following conflict of interests: participation in research projects from Tab Healthcare Research. EMB has the following conflict of interests: receipt of grants/research supports or participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by Abbott/Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Baxalta, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Fresenius, Gilead, GSK, Ipsen, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Shire, Takeda, Theramex, UCB and ViiV. DP has the following conflict of interests: participation in research projects by CSL Behring. MJPM has the following conflict of interests: participation in educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings (either attendance, speaking and/or delivering presentations) and advisory boards sponsored by CSL Behring, GSK, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Allergy Therapeutics, Roxall, LETI. IC is employed by CSL Behring. CA, JC, ADE, AJ, SLSF, MN, CS and CZ declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caballero, T., Alonso, C., Baeza, M. et al. Hereditary angioedema in Spain: medical care and patient journey. Orphanet J Rare Dis 19, 210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03182-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03182-1

Keywords

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172