Skip to main content
Download PDF

Brazilian registry of patients with porphyria: REBRAPPO study

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 18, Article number: 49 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Porphyrias are a rare group of disease due to inherited defects of heme synthesis with important systemic manifestations and great burden of disease for patients and families due to the exceptional course of disease with disabling chronic symptoms interposed by life-threatening acute attacks. Unfortunately, the porphyrias are usually underrecognized reflecting a lack of medical and disease awareness as well as few studies about natural history in large cohorts of patients. The main aim of this article is present consistent data about natural history and burden of disease in a large Brazilian cohort.

Methods

We conducted a national cross-sectional registry with retrospective clinical data of Brazilian patients with porphyria collected with Brazilian patients Association with Porphyria in collaboration with a tertiary care center for rare diseases.

Results

A cohort of 172 patients was analyzed in which 148 (86%) patients had the diagnosis of acute hepatic porphyria [AHP] that needed a mean of 62.04 medical visits and 9.6 years to achieve a definitive diagnosis. About AHP cohort, the most common first clinical manifestation were abdominal pain in 77 (52%) patients and acute muscle weakness in 23 (15.5%) with 73 (49.3%) patients presenting only one attack during disease course and 37 (25%) exhibiting 4 or more attacks in the last year. Of note, 105 patients with AHP reported chronic manifestations and the scores for quality of life are lower when compared with general healthy population.

Conclusions

Brazilian patients with AHP had a higher prevalence of chronic disabling manifestations and a poor quality of life like other cohorts and a higher proportion of patients with recurrent attacks than previously reported.

Background

Heme group production occurs predominantly in erythroblasts from the bone marrow (almost 80% of total heme production) and liver (around 20% of total heme group) and plays a major role as cofactor of different iron-based hemeproteins, such as hemoglobin, hepatic cytochromes P450, myoglobin, mitochondrial respiratory chain cytochromes and special enzymes (catalase, peroxidase, tryptophan pyrrolase, and nitric oxide synthase) [1, 2].

Porphyrias (from the Greek Porphyrus, purple) are a rare group of inherited or acquired metabolic disorders of the heme biosynthesis pathway and can be classified as either erythropoietic or hepatic, depending on the principal site of accumulation of pathway intermediates and based on clinical manifestations as acute porphyrias characterized by neurovisceral attacks with abdominal pain and neurologic features or chronic porphyrias with prominent cutaneous involvement in photoexposed skin areas due to overproduction of photosensitizing porphyrins [2, 3].

The first biochemical reaction in the heme biosynthesis pathway is the rate-limiting step and differs between liver and erythropoietic tissues, mostly because of differences in the activity of the first enzyme known as 5-aminolaevulinic acid synthase (ALAS) that is encoded by two genes, the ubiquitous delta-aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 gene (ALAS1, located on chromosome 3) in the liver and by the erythroid tissue-specific ALAS2 gene (located on chromosome X) in bone marrow [1,2,3].

The production of heme group in the liver and is controlled via negative-feedback regulation by the intracellular uncommitted heme pool and modulated by individual high-susceptibility risk factors (i.e., cytochrome P450-coding genes and their polymorphisms), endocrine (i.e., menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and puerperium), environmental (i.e., lead poisoning), dietetic factors (i.e., alcohol consumption, prolonged fasting or low carbohydrate diet, and cigarette smoking), and unsafe porphyrinogen drugs (i.e., hormonal contraceptives, phenytoin, barbiturates, and sulfonamides) [2,3,4].

Acute Hepatic Porphyrias (AHP) represent a rare group of four inherited metabolic disorders: Acute Intermittent Porphyria (AIP) caused by porphobilinogen deaminase enzyme deficiency due to HMBS genetic variants; Variegate Porphyria (VP) caused by protoporphyrinogen oxidase enzyme deficiency with PPOX genetic variants; Hereditary Coproporphyria (HCP) with coproporphyrinogen oxidase enzyme defect related to pathogenic variants in CPOX gene; and delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase (ALAD) deficiency porphyria (also known as ALAD deficiency or Doss porphyria) with abnormal enzyme activity of ALA dehydratase coded by ALAD gene [2,3,4]. AHP leads to marked overproduction of porphyrins and their precursors in the liver and abnormal accumulation of intermediate metabolites, mainly porphobilinogen (PBG) and delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) [2,3,4].

More recently, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapies for AHP (Givosiran, an N-acetyl-D-galactosamine-conjugated siRNA that specifically targeting ALAS1 messenger RNA in the liver) have shown important results in controlling recurrent attacks and improving the overall quality of life of patients. There are, however, few studies about the natural history of disease with consistent big data about the diagnostic journey and clinical profile in a large cohort of patients [5, 6].

This article presents a large national Brazilian cohort of patients with porphyria that aims to provide insights into the epidemiology, patient’s journey, diagnosis, clinical profile, natural history and quality of life with clinical implications for doctors, health agents and patients with porphyria that can be applied worldwide.

Methods

The Brazilian Registry of Patients with Porphyria (REBRAPPO) is a single research registry developed by the Neuromuscular Unit of Federal University of São Paulo in collaboration with Brazilian Porphyria Association (ABRAPO) that collected retrospective self-reported medical data from Brazilian patients with porphyria through a specific electronic form developed by the authors. The inclusion period was 90 days from December 1st, 2021 to February 28th, 2022. All patients gave written informed consent for participation in the study and for this publication, and study procedures were approved by institutional ethics committees (CAAE: 50086121.4.0000.5505). This research was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for good practice.

The electronic survey form was based on four axes: (1) demographical data, (2) disease history and medical information, (3) treatments and interventions, and (4) quality of life evaluated by the SF-12 Health Survey. The demographical data of interest for this study was: gender, residence, ethnicity, scholarity, monthly income, health coverage and occupation.

To understand disease history and medical information the following data were collected: age at onset, age at diagnosis, time to definitive diagnosis, subtype of porphyria, type of AHP, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), number of medical specialists consulted, number of medical visits until diagnosis, medical specialist who performed the diagnosis, number of family members with the diagnosis of porphyria, clinical manifestations related to porphyria, number of attacks and number of attacks in the last year for AHP patients, number of patients with chronic symptoms and clinical profile of chronic manifestations. For this study the definition of a porphyria attack was a clinical manifestation related to disease resulting in hospitalization, medical assistance on urgent health care or intravenous administration of hemin as previously described in the ENVISION study [5]. Recurrent attacks are defined as four or more attacks per year as previously described in the literature [5,6,7].

The chronic clinical manifestations and symptoms related to the population with AHP were categorized into four domains: (1) pain, (2) mood and sleep, (3) gastrointestinal and (4) other manifestations, similar to the EXPLORE study [6].

The third axis about treatments and interventions consisted of the following information: opioid consumption, use of glucose solution, hemin cycles, liver transplantation and treatment with Givosiran.

The quality of life was evaluated asking for patients with porphyria to describe their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SF-12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) that is a health profile instrument with 12-items to evaluate eight sub-domains classified in physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE) and mental health (MH) [8, 9]. These eight sub-domain scores can be weighted and summarized into two component scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score [8, 9]. The reference value for PCS and MCS scores for the US population have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 with lower score indicating a poor health status [8, 9].

The inclusion criteria for the study were: (1) male or female Brazilian patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic porphyria established by genetic test or biochemical analysis (fecal, urinary or plasmatic porphyrins or 24-h urinary ALA and PBG) at any age. After a detailed review of electronic answers, data were abstracted, de-identified by the collaborating investigators at the local study site and submitted through the secure Research Electronic Data Capture (REDcap) platform [10]. Patients with incomplete or duplicated data were excluded from the final study analysis.

The study primary outcomes were: (a) establish the demographical and epidemiological profile of Brazilian patients with porphyria, (b) comprehend the diagnostic journey and natural history related to disease, (c) evaluate the treatment options available and how they are used at Brazil, (d) estimate the quality of life and burden of disease.

The secondary outcomes were: (a) create a robust database that can be used for other clinical studies and for planning public health actions, (b) develop a platform with continuous data inclusion that allows obtaining special epidemiological data such as incidence and prevalence of porphyrias in a continental-sized country and monitoring the long-term impact of new therapies on the natural history of porphyrias trough data on survival and resource utilization of health services.

Descriptive statistics was applied, and categorical variables were summarized using counts and percentages of the total population. Continuous variables were reported using mean and interquartile range (IQR).

The Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (with Lilliefors adjustments) tests were performed to evaluate the normal distribution of the sample, and all variables proved to fit the normal distribution by at least one method.

Correlations between age at onset, age at diagnosis, time for diagnosis, number of attacks during disease course, number of attacks in the last years, PCS and MCS were performed with Pearson correlation coefficient with a correlation coefficient of r < 0.3 considered as weak, r = 0.3–0.59 a moderate, and r ≥ 0.6 a strong correlation and two‐sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the results of PCS and MCS scores according to the ‘number of attacks in the last year’.

The software Stata® 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Study population and demographical data

This study presents a cohort of 172 patients with porphyria that fully met the inclusion criteria of whom 147 (85.4%) are female, 96 (55.8%) are Caucasian and 82 (47.6%) patients are unmarried. The educational profile showed 69 (40.1%) patients had higher education degrees and just 4 (2.3%) had less than 5 years of education. The occupation data indicated that 35 (20.3%) patients are unemployed, 86 (50%) earn between 2 and 5 minimum wage per month and 52 (30.2%) live on less than one time minimum wage. Regarding access to health services, 100 (58.1%) patients had a private health insurance and 72 (41.8%) depend exclusively on the Brazilian public health system. Seventy-nine (45.9%) live in the southeastern region of the country and 47 (27.3%) patients of the national cohort live in São Paulo which is the most densely populated province in Brazil.

All demographical data are summarized in Table 1 and the geographic distribution of patients throughout the Brazilian territory is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1 Demographical Data
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical distribution of patients with Porphyria by the federal states of Brazil

Full size image

Disease history and medical information

In this cohort of 172 patients, 148 (86%) declare the diagnosis of AHP, 4 (2.3%) had Erythropoietic Porphyria (EP) and 20 (11.6%) were unaware of the disease subtype. Of the 4 patients with EP all had genetic and biochemical test confirmation with 1 patient exhibiting Congenital Erythropoietic Porphyria due to recessive variant on UROS gene, 1 had Erythropoietic Protoporphyria due to biallelic variants on FECH gene and 2 with Porphyria Cutanea Tarda due to UROD variants.

Of the 148 patients with AHP, 118 (79.7%) had AIP, 16 (10.8%) had VP, 9 (6.0%) had HCP and 2 (1.35%) presented ALAD deficiency with a total of 100 (67.5%) confirmed by genetic test.

Regarding the diagnostic journey of patients with AHP, 72 (48.6%) was diagnosed by a neurologist, 34 (22.9%) by a hematologist, 17 (11.4%) by a geneticist and only 12 (8.1%) received the diagnosis by a gastroenterologist or hepatologist. A total of 66 (44.5%) patients with AHP consulted more than five different medical specialists until the final diagnosis and 39 (26.3%) needed only one medical specialist to establish the final diagnosis. The patients with AHP needed a mean of 62.04 [IQR 5.0–50.5] medical consultations to achieve the final diagnosis, with 15 (10.1%) received the diagnosis at first medical visit and 24 (16.2%) required more than 100 medical visits to complete the diagnosis. According to family history, 54 (36.4%) patients with AHP reported no family history for porphyria and 11 (7.4%) had more than 10 family members affected by the disease. A summary of clinical data is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Clinical Data Summary
Full size table

The mean age at diagnosis was 30.2 years [IQR 22.0–36.0], the mean age at symptom onset was 20.5 years [IQR 14.0–27.0], the mean age at first attack was 24.6 years [IQR 18.0–30.25] and the mean time to definitive diagnosis was 9.6 years [IQR 3.0–14.0]; of the 148 patients with AHP, 11 (7.4%) received the diagnosis at pediatric age under 18 years and 61 (41.2%) had the symptom onset started before the age of 18 years. The mean weight of patients with AHP was 72.0 kg [IQR 60.0–83.0] with 40 (27.0%) patients weighing more than 80 kg, the mean height was 1.64 m [IQR 1.58–1.68] and mean BMI was 26.67 kg/m2 [IQR 23.26–29.64] with 33 (22.2%) patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m2.

The first clinical manifestation related to disease was abdominal pain in 77 (52.0%), acute muscle weakness in 23 (15.5%), acute encephalopathy in 16 (10.8%), dark urine in 13 (8.7%), skin abnormalities in 9 (6.0%) and acute psychosis in 8 (5.4%) of 148 patients with AHP.

The analysis of porphyria attacks showed a mean 6.2 [IQR 1.0–9.0] crisis per patient with 73 (49.3%) patients having only 1 attack and 53 (35.8%) presented with 4 or more attacks over the course of disease. In the last year, 70 (47.2%) patients reported no attacks, 30 (20.2%) had 1 attack and 37 (25%) had 4 or more attacks. For patients with recurrent attacks, the mean of attacks in the last year was 6.91 [IQR 5.0–8.0]. Chronic symptoms between attacks were reported by 105 (70.9%) patients. There is a strong correlation between the number of attacks in the last year with the number of attacks during disease course (r = 0.87).

The clinical profile during an attack for the cohort of 148 patients with AHP according to the four domains established above was: 1) pain, abdominal pain was reported by 140 (94.5%) patients, arm or leg pain by 136 (91.8%), muscle pain by 121 (81.7%) and back pain by 112 (75.6%); 2) mood and sleep complaints, fatigue occurred in 139 (93.9%) patients, anxiety in 132 (89.1%), insomnia in 125 (84.4%), trouble concentrating in 98 (66.2%) and hallucinations in 44 (29.7%); 3) gastrointestinal symptoms, nausea was present in 144 (97.2%) patients, loss of appetite in 113 (76.3%), constipation in 103 (69.5%) and diarrhea in 27 (18.2%); 4) other manifestations, palpitation was reported by 135 (91.2%) patients, numbness by 129 (87.1%), weakness by 111 (75%), dark urine by 95 (64.1%), fever by 56 (37.8%) and blisters/rashes by 19 (12.8%).

In relation to the 105 patients with AHP that reported chronic symptoms, the clinical profile was: 1) pain domain, arm or leg pain was observed in 63 (60%), abdominal pain in 51 (48.5%) and muscle pain in 48 (45.7%); 2) mood and sleep complaints, fatigue was reported by 82 (78%) patients, anxiety by 73 (69.5%), insomnia by 64 (60.9%), trouble concentrating by 53 (50.4%) and feeling unmotivated by 47 (44.7%); 3) gastrointestinal symptoms, constipation occurred in 60 (57.1%) patients, nausea in 53 (50.4%), heartburn in 38 (36.1%) and loss of appetite in 32 (30.4%); 4) other manifestations, numbness was present in 67 (63.8%) patients, weakness in 63 (60%), palpitation in 48 (45.7%), shakiness in 42 (40%), dark urine in 37 (35.2%) and blisters/rashes in 15 (14.2%). Medical history for systemic arterial hypertension was reported by 52 (35.1%) and positive family history for hepatocarcinoma was informed by 8 (5.4%) of 148 patients with AHP.

The clinical profile with percentage of patients reporting symptoms during an attack and chronic symptoms are shown on Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Clinical profile of acute attacks for patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyria

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Clinical profile of chronic manifestations for patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyria

Full size image

Treatments and Interventions

From the cohort of 148 patients with AHP, 137 (92.5%) patients reported being treated with glucose solution and 57 (38.5%) informed treatment with hemin (Normosang® or Panhematin®) during at least one attack. Of the 57 patients that received hemin, 19 (33.3%) were treated on an isolated attack, 24 (42.1%) were treated in 2 to 5 different occasions, 6 (10.5%) in 6 to 10 attacks and 8 (14.0%) patients received hemin in more than 10 different attacks. The mean duration of a hemin treatment cycle was 7.6 days [IQR 5.0–10.0] and 5 (3.3%) of 148 patients with AHP are undergoing prophylactic treatment with hemin monthly.

Only 1 patient underwent live transplantation and 2 patients are being treated with Givosiran (Givlaari®). Regarding pain treatment, 109 (73.6%) of 148 patients with AHP informed opioid use in at least one attack and 47 (31.7%) reported daily use of opioids for pain relief.

Quality of life

The mean PCS was 39.49 [IQR 30.84–47,14] and the mean MCS was found to be 35.48 [IQR 28.48–41.06] for the cohort of AHP patients. Mean PCS and MCS scores were lower than the norm scores for the general healthy US population and this indicated that Brazilian patients with AHP had a worse overall HRQoL as compared to the US norm population.

It is noteworthy that 51 (34.4%) of the 148 patients with AHP indicated that their general health is ‘fair’ or ‘poor’. During the past week, 66 (44.5%) patients declared that pain interfered with work ‘quite a bit’ or ‘extremely’ and just 3 (2%) pointed have a lot of energy ‘all of the time’. The PCS had a moderate inverse correlation with the ‘number of attacks in the last year’ (r = − 0.50) and MCS scores did not correlate with ‘time from onset of disease to final diagnosis’, ‘number of attacks in the last year’ or with ‘number of attacks during the disease course’.

ANOVA analysis to compare the results of PCS score according to the ‘number of attacks in the last year’ showed a statistically difference between patients with recurrent attacks exhibiting lower mean PCS score than patients who had only 1 attack or had no attack in the last year with a F value of 34.64 with p < 0.0001. Furthermore, lower MCS scores were observed in patients with recurrent attacks compared to patients that experienced just 1 attack or patients free of attack with a F value of 7.39 with p < 0.0001. Figure 4 shows the difference in PCS and MCS scores according to the ‘number of attacks in the last year’.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The quality-of-life profile with Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of SF-12 (12-item health survey) according to the number of attacks in the last year

Full size image

Discussion

The porphyrias are a rare and heterogenous group of inherited disorders due to defects in the heme biosynthesis pathway that is commonly misdiagnosed due to a combination of factors like unpredictable manifestations, easily missed without a high degree of clinical suspicion, non-pathognomonic symptoms, more prevalent conditions that can explain clinical features, low prevalence and low penetrance of the genetic variants constituting a big and hard challenge for many specialists [11,12,13].

This work represents a large nationwide cohort of Brazilian patients with porphyria already published in the literature with a sample and importance similar to the large Norwegian Registry of Porphyria carried out by the Norwegian Center for Porphyria (NAPOS), Swedish Registry of Porphyria and the Argentine cohort of the ‘Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias’ (CIPYP) with the important methodological difference that this study has a cross-sectional design and does not capture retrospective or prospective data for many years like the cohorts mentioned above [14,15,16]. Similar to other studies, most patients in the Brazilian cohort of porphyria are female and Caucasian with a high prevalence of AIP among patients with AHP and with the difference of a greater proportion of cases with VP (10.8%) and HCP (6%) than that observed in the EXPLORE (VP = 4.4%; HCP = 2.6%) and ENVISION (VP = 2.0%; HCP = 1%) studies [5, 6].

The unemployment rate among Brazilian patients with AHP are high corresponding to 20.3% of national cohort and similar to observed in other rare disorders like Multiple Sclerosis with an unemployment rate of 40% in Poland and 19.32% in Argentina [17, 18], Fabry’s disease with a rate of 39.5% [19] and higher when compared with other disorders such as Glycogen Storage Disease type I with 9% [20], Myasthenia Gravis with 13% [21], Vasculitis with 4% [22] and lower when compared to Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 a neuromuscular disorders with systemic complications in which only one third of adult patients are employed [23].

Almost 50% of Brazilian patients with porphyria were diagnosed by a neurologist and less than 10% by a gastroenterologist or hepatologist, although the first symptom in 52% of patients was abdominal pain indicating a low suspicion of the disease among gastroenterologists and a late diagnosis only when severe neurological impairment manifest. Abdominal pain is a frequent complain in clinical practice being estimated to be 7–10% of all emergency department visits and is the most common gastrointestinal symptom in outpatient clinics and in 41% of patients the condition is labeled as nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) representing the most common cause of surgical intervention due to acute abdominal pain in Emergency Department [24,25,26]; for this reason, AHP should always be remembered as a major differential diagnosis for patients with acute or recurrent abdominal pain specially when associated with neurological features like acute weakness, sensory disturbances, autonomic failure and acute encephalopathy [3, 27].

In contrast with an American study in which most subjects (81%) reported onset of symptoms in the 2nd to 4th decades of life, more than 40% of Brazilian patients with AHP reported onset of symptoms before 18 years of age; however, with similar age at definitive diagnosis [28]. Unfortunately, the mean time to definite diagnosis in our cohort was 9.6 years like previous data published in the literature that shows a mean time of 15 years to establish the diagnosis of AHP with the need for the development of high clinical suspicion in the medical community, especially in some specific conditions such as acute flaccid paralysis, acute dysautonomia, Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES), dark-reddish urine and hyponatremia in the context of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) [2, 3, 15, 28,29,30,31,32]. The clinical profile during an attack of patients with AHP has some difference in relation to the EXPLORE cohort with more Brazilian patients presenting arm or leg pain 91.8% versus 77% and muscle pain 81.7% versus 50% during an attack; also, Brazilian patients exhibited a high prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia and numbness present in more than 80% of patients and lower frequency of patients with dark urine when compared to EXPLORE cohort [6].

In relation to chronic clinical profile, more Brazilian patients reported chronic symptoms (70.9%) than EXPLORE patients (65%) with some interest differences like arm or leg pain as the major cause of pain in Brazilian patients in contrast to abdominal pain in EXPLORE cohort and a higher prevalence of anxiety, insomnia, constipation, nausea, fatigue, numbness and weakness present in more than half of patients in Brazilian patients and in a less extension with < 20% of patients in EXPLORE study; furthermore, Brazilian cohort had more patients with systemic arterial hypertension (35%) as long-term complication related to AHP than previously reported [6]. Other important clinical differences of this cohort compared to the EXPLORE study are a higher number of patients reporting zero attacks (47.2% versus 6%) and a lower proportion of patients with more than 10 attacks (4.7% versus 32%) in the last 12 months (6). Although, the frequency of Brazilian patients with recurrent attacks is high, corresponding to 25% of this cohort, in contrast to the proportion of 8% previously reported in the literature [7].

Brazilian patients with AHP have significant compromise of HRQoL in both domains (physical and mental) when compared with a normal population and the impairment of PCS (mean 39.4) are similar to the patients included on the ENVISION study (mean 38.4 on placebo group and 39.4 at Givosiran arm at baseline) [6]. Moreover, the impact of disease on mental health of Brazilian patients is severe with a high prevalence of anxiety (69.5%), as already indicated by other study in patients with Porphyria by different methods (Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, State Trait Anxiety Disorders and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) [33,34,35,36]. Of note, in our cohort the PCS and MCS have a correlation with the number of attacks in the last year with patients with recurrent attacks (> 4 attacks per year) had lower scores of HRQoL as already observed in a previous study with 81 patients with AHP 20 years ago [34, 35]. Brazilian patients with AHP have poor quality of life measured by SF-12 when compared with other rare disorders like chronic musculoskeletal disorders (PCS = 42.38; MCS = 46.57), cardiac disease (PCS = 32.5; MCS = 45.4), hemophilia (PCS = 43.69; MCS = 46.48) and inflammatory bowel disease (PCS = 36.10; MCS = 36.04) [37,38,39,40]. The medical burden of AHP disease in Brazilian patients is broad requiring another 9 years and more than 60 consultations for diagnostic definition which is higher than other rare conditions such as Hereditary Angioedema [41], Fabry Disease [42] and Pompe Disease [43] and compatible with that has been described for AHP [44]. Recently, some studies demonstrated that economic burden of AHP are high with lifetime healthcare costs for a person with AHP were estimated to be €3,030,316 due to frequent hospitalizations associated with porphyria attacks compared to the general population and that elimination of AHP attacks could also lead to reductions in disability payments of €179,184 and healthcare cost savings of €1,511,027 per patient [45] which is important on Brazilian context when 41.8% of patients with AHP depends exclusively of public health system and 24.5% of the patients were treated with heme arginate in more than 6 attacks throughout the history of disease.

Conclusions

Our study adds new knowledge on the type and prevalence of chronic manifestations related to AHP and new data about the natural history and burden of disease for these rare inherited disorders due to a liver dysfunction that makes an important different diagnosis for many medical specialties.

Additionally, this national registry reinforces the current knowledge that AHP should be considered a chronic condition complicated by acute attacks with frequent and disabling progressive chronic symptoms present in more than 65% of the patients, most of them related to neurological and psychiatric impairment.

Moreover, our study fortifies the knowledge that patients with AHP with recurrent attacks had a poor quality of life and great disability representing an important public health problem that can be change with actions for disease awareness and medical education driven by the advent of new innovative genetic therapies based on interference RNA technology mainly represented by Givosiran.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets are not publicly available due to individual privacy reasons (patients’ confidentiality).

Abbreviations

AHP:

Acute hepatic porphyrias

AIP:

Acute intermittent porphyria

ALA:

Delta-aminolevulinic acid

ALAD:

Delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase

ALAS:

5-Aminolaevulinic acid synthase

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Bodily pain

CIPYP:

Centro de Investigaciones sobre Porfirinas y Porfirias

VP:

Variegate porphyria

EP:

Erythropoietic porphyria

GH:

General health

HCP:

Hereditary coproporphyria

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

SF-12v2:

SF-12 health survey version 2

IQR:

Interquartile range

MCS:

Mental component summary

MH:

Mental health

NAPOS:

Norwegian registry of porphyria

NSAP:

Nonspecific abdominal pain

PBG:

Porphobilinogen

PCS:

Physical component summary

PF:

Physical functioning

PRES:

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

RE:

Role-emotional

REDcap:

Research electronic data capture

RP:

Role physical

SD:

Standard deviation

SF:

Social functioning

SIADH:

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion

siRNA:

Small interfering RNA

VT:

Vitality

References

  1. Layer G, Reichelt J. Structure and function of enzymes in heme biosynthesis. Protein Sci. 2010;19(6):1137–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Puy H, Gouya L. Porphyrias. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):924–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Souza PVS, Badia BML. Acute hepatic porphyrias for the neurologist: current concepts and perspectives. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021;79(1):68–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bissel DM, Anderson KE. Porphyria. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):862–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balwani M, Sardh E, Ventura P, et al. Phase 3 trial of RNAi therapeutic givosiran for acute intermittent porphyria. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(24):2289–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gouya L, Ventura P, Balwani M, et al. EXPLORE: a prospective, multinational, natural history study of patients with acute hepatic porphyria with recurrent attacks. Hepatology. 2020;71(5):1546–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitt C, Lenglet H, Yu A, et al. Recurrent attacks of acute hepatic porphyria: major role of the chronic inflammatory response in the liver. J Intern Med. 2018;284(1):78–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maruish ME, editor. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey. 3rd ed. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen J, Thomsem J. Health-related quality of life in porphyria cutanea tarda: a cross-sectional registry based study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95: 103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barletta E, Belsuzarri TA. Acute neurological manifestations of porphyrias and its types: a systematic-review. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2021;19(1):3–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Malley R, Rao G. Porphyria: often discussed but too often missed. Pract Neurol. 2018;18(5):352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcacci M, Ricci A. Challenges in diagnosis and management of acute hepatic porphyrias: from an uncommon pediatric onset to innovative treatments and perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bylesjö I, Wikberg A. Clinical aspects of acute intermittent porphyria in northern Sweden: a population-based study. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(5):612–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thunell S, Floderus Y. Porphyria in Sweden. Physiol Res. 2006;55(Suppl 2):S109-118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez MDC, Cerbino G. Clinical, biochemical, and genetic characterization of acute hepatic porphyrias in a cohort of Argentine patients. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2021;9(5): e1059.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koziarska D, Krol J. Prevalence and factor leading to unemployment in MS (multiple sclerosis) patients undergoing immunomodulatory treatment in Poland. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0194117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanotti S, Eizaguirre MB, Ciufia NP, et al. Employment status monitoring in an Argentinian population of patients with multiple sclerosis: particularities of a developing country. Work. 2021;68(4):1121–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Körver S, Geurtsen G, Hollak CEM, et al. Depressive symptoms in Fabry disease: the importance of coping, subjective health perception and pai. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Garbade SF, Ederer V, Burgard P, et al. Impact of glycogen storage disease type I on adult daily life: a survey. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ignatova V, Kostadinov K, Vassileva E, et al. Socio-Economic Burden of Myasthenia gravis: a cost-of-illness study in Bulgaria. Front Public Health. 2022;10: 822909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sreih AG, Cronin K, Shaw DG, et al. Diagnostic delays in vasculitis and factors associated with time to diagnosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. De Antonio M, Dogan C, Daidj F, et al. The DM-scope registry: a rare disease innovative framework bridging the gap between research and medical care. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cervellin G, Mora R, Ticinesi A, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(19):362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hastings RS, Powers RD. Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(7):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fagerström A, Paajanen P, Saarelainen H, et al. Non-specific abdominal pain remains as the most common reason for acute abdomen: 26-year retrospective audit in one emergency unit. Scan J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(10):1072–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Souza PVS, Badia BML. Acute hepatic porphyria: pathophysiological basis of neuromuscular manifestations. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 715523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonkovsky HL, Maddukuri VC, Yazici C, et al. Acute porphyrias in the USA: features of 108 subjects from porphyrias consortium. Am J Med. 2014;127(12):1233–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kondo M, Yano Y. Porphyrias in Japan: compilation off all cases reported through 2002. Int J Hematol. 2004;79(5):448–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alfadhel M, Saleh N. Acute intermittent porphyria caused by novel mutation in HMBS gene, misdiagnosed as cholecystitis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:2135–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaramillo-Calle DA, Solano JM. Porphyria-induced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and central nervous system dysfunction. Mol Genet Metab. 2019;128(3):242–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solares I, Tejedor M, Jericó D, et al. Management of hyponatremia associated with acute porphyria-proposal for the use of tolvaptan. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(17):1098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Millward LM, Kelly P. Anxiety and depression in the acute porphyrias. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(6):1099–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Francesca G, Nicolli A. Psychological aspect and quality of life in Porphyrias: a review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(5):1193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Millward LM, Kelly P. Self-rated psychosocial consequences and quality of life in the acute hepatic porphyrias. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2001;24(7):733–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Naik H, Stoecker M. Experiences and concerns of patients with recurrent attacks of acute hepatic porphyria: a qualitative study. Mol Genet Metab. 2016;119(3):278–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cuesta-Vargas AI, González-Sanchez M. Effect on health-related quality of life of a multimodal physiotherapy program in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bahall M, Legall G. Quality of life among patients with cardiac disease: the impact of comorbid depression. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Shah RM, Banahan BF 3rd, Holmes ER, et al. An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the sf-12v2 health survey among adults with hemophilia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chiarini M, Di Simone E, Scafuro C, et al. Health self-perception in patient with Crohn’s disease: a web survey. Clin Ter. 2017;169(6):e401–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Isono M, Kokado M. Why does it take so long for rare disease patients to get an accurate diagnosis?—a qualitative investigation of patient experiences of hereditary angioedema. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0265847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Martins AM, Cabera G, Molt F, et al. The clinical profiles of female patients with Fabry disease in Latin America: a Fabry Registry analysis of natural history data from 169 patients based on enzyme replacement therapy status. JIMD Rep. 2019;49(1):107–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Reuser AJJ, van der Ploeg AT, Chien YH, et al. GAA variants and phenotypes among 1,079 patients with Pompe disease: data from the Pompe Registry. Hum Mutat. 2019;40(11):2146–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Neeleman RA, Wagenmakers MAEM, Koole-Lesuis RH, et al. Medical and financial burden of acute intermittent porphyria. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2018;41(5):809–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Connolly MP, Kotsopoulos N. Estimating the broader fiscal consequences of acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) with recurrent attacks in Belgium using a public economic analytic framework. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the patients, caregivers and ABRAPO (Brazilian Porphyria Association) who participated in this study.

Funding

This manuscript and research were supported by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (BR-AHP-21-270). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuromuscular Unit, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Embaú Street, 67, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04039-060, Brazil

    Paulo Victor Sgobbi Souza, Wladimir Bocca Vieira de Rezende Pinto, Paulo de Lima Serrano, Bruno de Mattos Lombardi Badia, Igor Braga Farias, Ana Carolina dos Santos Jorge, Roberta Ismael Lacerda Machado, Icaro França Navarro Pinto, Glenda Barbosa Barros, Helvia Bertoldo de Oliveira, Samia Rogatis Calil & Acary Souza Bulle Oliveira

  2. Universidade Anhanguera, Campinas, Brazil

    Gliciane Afonso

  3. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Cibele Franz

Authors
  1. Paulo Victor Sgobbi Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gliciane Afonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wladimir Bocca Vieira de Rezende Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paulo de Lima Serrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bruno de Mattos Lombardi Badia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Igor Braga Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ana Carolina dos Santos Jorge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Roberta Ismael Lacerda Machado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Icaro França Navarro Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Glenda Barbosa Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Helvia Bertoldo de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Samia Rogatis Calil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Cibele Franz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Acary Souza Bulle Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PVSS: designed and conducted study, drafted manuscript, collected data, analyzed data, interpreted data. GA: designed and conducted study, drafted manuscript, collected data. WBVRP: drafted manuscript, analyzed data, interpreted data. PLS: collected data, analyzed data, interpreted data. BMLB: collected data, interpreted data. IBF: interpreted data. ACSJ: interpreted data. RILM: analyzed data, interpreted data. IFNP: analyzed data, interpreted data. GBB: interpreted data. HBO: interpreted data. SRC: interpreted data. CF: analyzed data, interpreted data. ASBO: analyzed data, interpreted data. All authors revised manuscript content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Victor Sgobbi Souza.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval of this study is covered by the institutional ethics committee (CAAE: 93830518.5.0000.5505). Consent for publication was obtained from all participants/caregivers.

Consent for publication

All the patients or caregivers gave written informed consent to this publication.

Competing interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, P.V.S., Afonso, G., de Rezende Pinto, W.B.V. et al. Brazilian registry of patients with porphyria: REBRAPPO study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 18, 49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02653-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02653-1

Keywords

  • Porphyrias
  • Acute hepatic porphyria
  • Heme metabolism
  • Hereditary rare diseases
  • Givosiran
  • Natural history
  • Porphobilinogen
  • Aminolevulinic acid

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172