Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical and genetic characterization of pediatric patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3): identification of 14 novel ABCB4 variants and review of the literatures

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 17, Article number: 445 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by pathogenic variants of the gene ABCB4. This study aimed to investigate the ABCB4 genotypic and the clinical phenotypic features of PFIC3 patients.

Methods

The clinical and molecular genetic data of 13 new pediatric patients with PFIC3 as well as 82 reported ones in the PubMed and CNKI databases were collected and analyzed.

Results

The 13 new PFIC3 patients included six females and seven males, and the main presentations were hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, jaundice, and pruritus, as well as increased levels of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). Fourteen new ABCB4 variants were detected, including eight diagnosed to be likely-pathogenic and six, pathogenic. Among all the 95 PFIC3 cases, hepatomegaly was observed in 85.3% (81/95), pruritus in 67.4% (64/95), splenomegaly in 52.6% (50/95), jaundice in 48.4% (46/95), portal hypertension in 34.7% (33/95) and GGT elevation in 100% (88/88) of the patients. Positive responses at varied degrees to oral ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment were observed in 66.1% (39/59) of the patients, among whom 38.5% (15/39) fully recovered in terms of the laboratory changes. Although the condition remained stable in 53 patients (58.9%, 53/90), the clinical outcomes were not promising in the rest 37 cases (41.1%, 37/90), including 7 died, 27 having undergone while another 3 waiting for liver transplantation. A total of 96 ABCB4 variants were detected in the 95 patients. PFIC3 patients with biallelic null variants exhibited earlier onset ages [10.5 (2, 18) vs. 19 (8, 60) months, p = 0.007], lower UDCA response rate [18.2% (2/11) vs. 77.1% (37/48), p = 0.001], and more unpromising clinical outcomes [80% (12/15) vs. 33.3% (25/75), p = 0.001], compared with those with non-biallelic null variants.

Conclusions

PFIC3 presented with hepatomegaly, pruritus, splenomegaly and jaundice with increased serum GGT level as a biochemistry hallmark. Although varying degrees of improvement in response to UDCA therapy were observed, 41.1% of PFIC3 patients exhibited unfavorable prognosis. ABCB4 genotypes of biallelic null variants were associated with severer PFIC3 phenotypes. Moreover, the 14 novel variants in this study expanded the ABCB4 mutation spectrum, and provided novel molecular biomarkers for diagnosis of PFIC3 patients.

Introduction

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) included a group of rare autosomal recessive diseases caused by pathogenic variants of the genes encoding proteins related to the formation and transfer of bile acids in the liver [1]. The PFIC patient's onset varied from the neonatal period to early adulthood, which usually developed fibrosis and end-stage liver disease before adulthood [2]. Based on different causative genes, PFIC could be divided into types 1–6, with ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, TJP2, NR1H4, and MYO5B being the causative gene, respectively [3].

The gene ABCB4 causing PFIC3 (OMIM # 602347) was located on chromosome 7q21, which encoded a liver-specific canalicular transporter, the Multi-Drug Resistant 3 (MDR3) protein [4]. MDR3 translocated phosphatidylcholine from the inner to the outer leaflet of the canalicular membrane, resulting phosphatidylcholine efflux into the bile [5, 6]. In the aqueous environment of bile, phospholipids form mixed micelles with cholesterol and bile acids, thereby preventing the formation of cholesterol gallstones and the detergent action of free bile acids which was injurious to cholangiocyte membrane [7, 8]. Typical clinical features of PFIC3 included jaundice, pruritus, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly, which could progress to cirrhosis and liver failure before adulthood. Thus far, due to the lack of pathognomonic clinical symptoms or signs, the definitive diagnosis of PFIC3 relied on the ABCB4 genetic analysis [9].

In the recent years, the clinical application of molecular genetic techniques facilitated the timely diagnosis of PFIC patients, and an increasing number of PFIC3 patients were reported around the world [10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, the molecular and clinical characteristics of this condition, generally as a rare liver disease, remained yet far from being completely understood. This study analyzed the phenotypic and genotypic features of PFIC3 patients by reporting 13 new pediatric patients and reviewing the relevant literatures.

Methods

Subjects and ethical approval

The research subjects in this study included 13 pediatric patients including seven males and six females from 12 unrelated families. The clinical data of the 13 patients were collected for analysis, including their ages, genders, history, clinical presentations, laboratory changes, treatment and outcomes. Most the data were collected from the medical record databases in the participating hospitals, with partial data from other hospitals being provided by patients' parents at their referrals to our clinics.

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, and written informed consents were signed by the parents of all patients before this study.

Genetic analysis

Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood according to standard procedures, and all patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the targeted or whole exomes, to explore the underling genetic causes. ABCB4 variants detected were then verified by Sanger sequencing. The sequencing results were aligned with the ABCB4 gene sequence (ENST00000649586.2), which was available at Ensembl Genome Browser (www.ensembl.org). The variant nomenclature was in agreement with current guidelines of the Human Genome Variation Society (http://www.hgvs.org/rec.html).

Pathogenicity evaluation

All the variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standards and guidelines.

The allele frequencies of the identified variants were collected from the 1000 Genomes Project (https://www.internationalgenome.org), the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomeAD, http://gnomad-sg.org), the Human Gene Mutation database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php), and all relevant literatures in database of PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Conservation of mutated amino acids was analyzed by comparatively aligning the amino acid sequences of ABCB4 orthologs collected from the Ensembl Genome Browse. The 20 primate homologous proteins include human, angola colobus, tarsier, chimpanzee, bonobo, bushbaby, black snub-nosed monkey, gorilla, drill, capuchin, gelada, gibbon, macaque, olive baboon, mouse lemur, golden snub-nosed monkey, sooty mangabey, coquerel’s sifaka, pig-tailed macaque, and bolivian squirrel monkey.

The pathogenicity of the novel missense variants was predicted by using the three online programs PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2), Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org) and PROVEAN (http://provean.jcvi.org/seq_submit.php). PolyPhen-2 analysis identified variant as probably damaging if the probability was > 0.85, and possibly damaging if the probability was > 0.15. Mutation Taster value close to 1 indicated a high security of the prediction. PROVEAN predicted a variant as “deleterious” if the prediction score was < − 2.5. Moreover, the online bioinformatics tools NNspl (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) and Human Splicing Finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/HSF.shtml) were used to assess the potential of splicing-site variants to disrupt normal splicing.

Review of the literatures

Electronic databases including PubMed and CNKI (https://www.cnki.net) were retrieved by using the keywords “ABCB4” and “PFIC3”. The genotypic and phenotypic data of the pediatric patients with clear molecular genetic diagnosis and detailed clinical information were collected and analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with the use of IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Normally distributed data were expressed as mean ± SD and then compared using Student’s t-test. Data of skewed distribution were presented as the median values (P25, P75), and comparisons were conducted by means of Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages, and statistical differences were compared by Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Clinical and genetic characteristics of the 13 new PFIC3 patients

Table 1 summarized the clinical information of the 13 new PFIC3 patients from 12 unrelated families. The ages of symptom onset were 36 (8, 67) months. As the commonest clinical presentation in this cohort, hepatomegaly was observed in 13 patients, followed by splenomegaly in 11, jaundice in seven, pruritus in four cases. The biochemistry hallmark was markedly increased levels of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in all patients. On the last follow up, two patients demonstrated unfavorable outcomes: one was waiting for liver transplantation due to hepatic decompensation and one had died of liver failure. Nine patients were alive with stable condition, and the rest two lost contact.

Table 1 Clinical information of the 13 new PFIC3 patients
Full size table

All the 13 patients were either homozygous or compound heterozygous for ABCB4 variants (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). As listed in Fig. 1, a total of 23 ABCB4 variants were detected in the 13 new PFIC3 patients, and 14 variants were not detected in any PFIC3 patients previously, including eight missense c.2782A > G(p.Arg928Gly), c.1645C > T(p.Arg549Cys), c.1801G > A (p.Ala601Thr), c.1406G > A(p.Arg469Lys), c.716C > T(p.Ser239Leu), c.3230C > T(p.Thr1077Met), c.2914G > A(p.Asp972Asn), and c.965 T > C(p.Leu322Pro), three frameshift c.3100_3101insA(p.Ile1034Asnfs*4), c.3789delA(p.Gly1264Alafs*38) and c.879dupA(p.Ala294Serfs*62), two splicing-site c.136-2A > G and c.80 + 1G > C, as well as one nonsense variant(s) c.2123G > A(p.Trp708*).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ABCB4 genotypes of the 13 new PFIC3 patients from 12 unrelated families. The arrows indicated the probands in each family, and the deceased individuals were shown with a slash. Circles and squares represented females and males, respectively. The different ABCB4 variants were illustrated in different colors in this figure

Full size image

The variants c.1801G > A(p.Ala601Thr) and c.3230C > T(p.Thr1077Met) were included in the database gnomeAD with the allele frequencies of 0.007962‰ and 0.1991‰, respectively, while the rest 12 novel variants have neither been reported in any official literatures nor included in any variant databases, to the best of our knowledge. The amino acid sequences of the homologous peptides in a total of 20 primates were aligned comparatively, and the results showed the eight novel missense variants were localized in highly conserved regions of all the 20 primate homologous proteins (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparative alignment of the homologous peptides affected by the eight novel missense variants in 20 primate species. The eight novel missense variants all affected a highly conserved amino acid residue of MDR3 protein

Full size image

In the study, six out of the 14 novel variants were classified to be pathogenic, and remaining eight as likely pathogenic, according to the ACMG standards. The relevant evidences were listed in detail in Table 2.

Table 2 Novel ABCB4 variants and the pathogenicity classification
Full size table

Findings of literature review

The clinical and molecular genetic data of 82 pediatric PFIC3 patients, who were definitely diagnosed with biallelic ABCB4 variants and had relatively complete clinical information in 20 official literatures [11,12,13, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], were summarized in Additional file 2: Table S1. Together with the 13 new PFIC3 patients in this study, a total of 95 patients (38 females, 39 males and 18 gender undescribed) were in-depth analyzed in terms of the phenotypic and genotypic features.

The ages of symptom onset were 18 (7, 50) months. Hepatomegaly was observed in 85.3% (81/95), pruritus in 67.4% (64/95), splenomegaly in 52.6% (50/95), jaundice in 48.4% (46/95), portal hypertension in 34.7% (33/95) and failure to thrive (14.7%, 14/95) of all the cases. In addition, gastrointestinal bleeding, discolored stools, gallstone, abdominal distension, ascites, cholecystitis, and reduced bone density were also observed some patients. Regarding serum biochemistry, 88 patients (100%, 88/88) exhibited increased levels of GGT. Besides, the elevation of aspartate transaminase (ALT), alanine transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil), direct bilirubin (DBil), total bile acids (TBA) was observed in 91.9% (68/74), 98.4% (61/62), 45.5% (30/66), 45.3% (24/53) and 93.8% (45/48) of the patients, respectively.

Positive responses at varied degrees to oral ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment were observed in 66.1% (39/59) of the patients, of whom 38.5% (15/39) fully recovered in terms of the laboratory changes. In clinical outcome analysis on the last follow-up, five out of all 95 patients were excluded due to loss of contact; the condition remained stable in 53 patients (58.9%, 53/90), while the clinical outcomes were not promising in the rest 37 cases (41.1%, 37/90), including 7 died, 27 having undergone while another 3 waiting for liver transplantation.

Among the 95 PFIC3 patients, a total of 96 different ABCB4 variants were detected, and missense variants 60.4% (58/96) was on top of the list, followed by frameshift (14.6%, 14/96), nonsense (11.5%, 11/96), splicing-site (12.5%, 12/96), exons deletion (1%, 1/96), as summarized in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The distribution of the 96 ABCB4 variants detected in the 95 PFIC3 patients in this study. The novel ABCB4 variants identified in this study were marked with asterisks. E2-E28 represented the 27 encoding ABCB4 exons

Full size image

Genotype–phenotype correlation

In this study, the frameshift, nonsense, canonical ± 1 or 2 splicing-site variants and exons deletion were defined as null variants, while missense and non-canonical splicing-site, as non-null variants, according to the ACMG standards. The ABCB4 phenotypes of the 95 PFIC3 patients were categorized into two groups: biallelic null variants (n = 18) and non-biallelic null variants (n = 77). It was found that PFIC3 patients with biallelic null variants exhibited earlier onset ages [10.5 (2, 18) vs. 19 (8, 60) months, p = 0.007], lower UDCA response rate [18.2% (2/11) vs. 77.1% (37/48), p = 0.001)], and more unpromising clinical outcomes [80% (12/15) vs. 33.3% (25/75), p = 0.001], compared with those with non-biallelic null variants genotypes.

Discussion

This study described 13 new PFIC3 patients from 12 unrelated families, and among the 23 ABCB4 variants detected, 14 were not reported previously in any official literatures, including eight missense, three frameshift, two splicing-site, and one nonsense variant(s). The two frameshift variants c.3100_3101insA(p.Ile1034Asnfs*4) and c.879dupA(p.Ala294Serfs*62) as well as the nonsense variant c.2123G > A(p.Trp708*) introduced premature stop codons in the MDR3 residues 1037, 355 and 708, respectively. Another frameshift variant c.3789delA(p.Gly1264Alafs*38) led to prolongation of the MDR3 molecule though the loss of the original stop codon. The canonical splicing-site variants c.136-2A > G and c.80 + 1G > C disrupted the normal acceptor or donor splicing site in the ABCB4 introns 2 and 3, respectively. According to the ACMG standards and guidelines, the six novel variants above were all null ABCB4 variants, and was diagnosed to be pathogenic, with the relevant evidences listed in Table 2.

The remaining eight novel missense variants were all absent or included rather rarely included in public databases (PM2), and among them, c.2782A > G(p.Arg928GlyA), c.1645C > T(p.Arg549Cys), c.716C > T(p.Ser239Leu), and c.3230C > T(p.Thr1077Met) proved to be in trans with a previously-reported pathogenic variant by testing parents (PM3) [11, 21]. All the novel missense variants cosegregated with the PFIC3 phenotype in this study (PP1). It was well-known that ABCB4 missense variants were a common mechanism for PFIC3 development (PP2) [21, 24, 27, 32,33,34]. In silico prediction suggested them to be disease-causing/ deleterious/possibly damaging/probably damaging, and with the involved amino acid residues all being highly conserved among 20 primates (PP3). Moreover, the biochemical and clinical presentations of the ten patients were quite specific for PFIC3 (PP4). Although in vitro or in vivo functional analysis was not performed due to technical limitation, the evidences above rendered the eight novel missense variants all “likely pathogenic” and supported the diagnosis of PFIC3 in the patients, since according to the ACMG standards, a variant classified as likely pathogenic typically has sufficient evidence that a health-care provider can use the molecular testing information in clinical decision making when combined with other evidence of the disease in question [35].

The MDR3 protein was primarily expressed in the liver, functioning as a floppase that translocated specifically phosphatidylcholine from the inner to the outer leaflet of the hepatocytes canalicular membranes [36]. Phosphatidylcholine was solubilized by canalicular bile salts to form mixed micelles, therefore protecting the biliary tree from exposure to toxic and detergent effects of bile salts [37]. The ABCB4 variants in this study impaired the floppase function of the MDR3 protein, and thus the depletion of phosphatidylcholine and elevation of hydrophobic bile acids in the biliary tubules damaged the integrity of the cholangiocyte membrane, leading to the development of intrahepatic cholestasis and presenting as hepatomegaly, pruritus, splenomegaly, jaundice and portal hypertension. Besides, low phosphatidylcholine levels would be expected to destabilize micelles and promote lithogenicity of bile with crystallization of cholesterol, which could facilitate liver damage by obstructing small bile ducts [38]. This could explain the occurrence of gallstones in a small number of children with PFIC3 as shown in Additional file 2: Table S1.

In this study, all PFIC3 patients exhibited increased serum GGT levels, constituting a biochemistry hallmark of this condition. Serum GGT was deemed to be mainly of hepatobiliary origin and has been used as a “liver test” for decades [39]. The reasons for elevated GGT values in those with hepatobiliary disease included de novo synthesis, release of membrane-bound GGT (by detergent effects of bile acids), regurgitation of bile into the blood stream, and change in permeability or destruction of biliary epithelial cells [40]. Due to the impaired MDR3 function, PFIC3 patients lacked phosphatidylcholine in the bile to form micelles, and thus the very detergent bile liberated GGT from the canalicular membrane, giving rise to cholangitis with high serum GGT activity [41, 42].

At present, medical treatment was the first line of therapy offered to PFIC3 patient [9, 43], and the major goal of medical treatment was to relieve symptoms, improve the nutritional status, and to treat or prevent complications due to cirrhosis and portal hypertension [38]. UDCA was the most common medicine in patients with PFIC3 [44], and the PFIC3 patients with residual phosphatidylcholine secretion and MDR3 expression, especially those with missense variants, responded to UDCA in 70% of cases [45], and even in those with cirrhosis, UDCA could delay PFIC3 progression [12]. In this study, 66.1% (39/59) of the patients had positive responses to oral UDCA, of whom 38.5% (15/39) fully recovered in terms of the laboratory changes. This was not surprising since UDCA had multiple mechanisms of action in cholestatic disorder including protection of cholangiocytes against cytotoxicity of hydrophobic bile acids, stimulation of hepatobiliary secretion of hydrophobic bile acids, inhibition of liver cell apoptosis, as well as anti-inflammation and immunomodulation [46, 47].

Although most PFIC3 patients showed varying degrees of improvement in response to UDCA therapy, unfavorable prognosis was observed in some cases. Actually, this condition was progressive in the majority of affected patients, and carried a high risk of developing cirrhosis and liver failure during the first 2 decades of life [48]. In this study, 41.1% (37/90) of PFIC3 patients had a poor prognosis, including 7 died, 27 having undergone while another 3 waiting for liver transplantation. On the last follow up, the condition remained stable in 53 patients (58.9%, 53/90), but their long-term prognoses were still uncertain, which needed to be followed up. So far, like other end-stage liver disease, liver transplantation remained the last resort in patients unresponsive to medical treatment [49]. Nevertheless, the lack of donor liver organ and lifelong burden of immunosuppressive therapy restricted the treatment option for this devastating condition [50].

ABCB4 variants exhibited remarkable heterogeneity, and the extent to which they impaired MDR3 floppase activity determined the course and outcome of the PFIC3 patients [21]. Depending on whether they affected the traffic, activity, or stability of the protein, ABCB4 variants could be classified as follows: (I) defective synthesis, mainly nonsense and frameshift variants, (II) affect protein maturation, (III) with little or no effect on protein maturation but defective proteins, (IV) affect the stability and (V) variants without detectable effects, providing the strong basis for the development of genotype-based therapies for PFIC3 [24]. This study found that PFIC3 patients with biallelic null variants exhibited earlier onset ages, lower UDCA response rate and more unpromising clinical outcomes, which clearly indicated that null ABCB4 variants were associated with severer PFIC3 phenotypes. Understanding the genotype–phenotype correlation contributed to the prediction of prognosis and provided additional guidance to physicians and patients about the likely disease course [15].

Conclusions

PFIC3 presented with hepatomegaly, pruritus, splenomegaly and jaundice with increased serum GGT level as a biochemistry hallmark. Although varying degrees of improvement in response to UDCA therapy were observed, 41.1% of PFIC3 patients exhibited unfavorable prognosis. ABCB4 genotypes of biallelic null variants were associated with severer PFIC3 phenotypes. Moreover, the 14 novel variants in this study expanded the ABCB4 variant mutation spectrum, and provided novel molecular biomarkers for the definite diagnosis of PFIC3 patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed for this study were available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PFIC3:

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

UDCA:

Ursodeoxycholic acid

MDR3:

Multi-drug resistant 3

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

ACMG:

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

ALT:

Aspartate transaminase

AST:

Alanine transaminase

TBil:

Total bilirubin

DBil:

Direct bilirubin

TBA:

Total bile acids

References

  1. Davit-Spraul A, Gonzales E, Baussan C, Jacquemin E. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacquemin E. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36(Suppl 1):S26–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martínez-García J, Molina A, González-Aseguinolaza G, Weber ND, Smerdou C. Gene therapy for acquired and genetic cholestasis. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6):1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alam S, Lal BB. Recent updates on progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis types 1, 2 and 3. Outcome and therapeutic strategies. World J Hepatol. 2022;14(1):98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falguières T, Aït-Slimane T, Housset C, Maurice M. ABCB4. Insights from pathobiology into therapy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2014;38(5):557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oude Elferink RPJ, Paulusma CC. Function and pathophysiological importance of ABCB4 (MDR3 P-glycoprotein). Pflugers Arch. 2007;453(5):601–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bull LN, Thompson RJ. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Clin Liver Dis. 2018;22(4):657–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venot Q, Delaunay JL, Fouassier L, Delautier D, Falguières T, Housset C, et al. A PDZ-like motif in the biliary transporter ABCB4 interacts with the scaffold protein EBP50 and regulates ABCB4 cell surface expression. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1): e0146962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava A. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014;4(1):25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Degiorgio D, Colombo C, Seia M, Porcaro L, Costantino L, Zazzeron L, et al. Molecular characterization and structural implications of 25 new ABCB4 mutations in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3). Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15(12):1230–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacquemin E, De Vree JM, Cresteil D, Sokal EM, Sturm E, Dumont M, et al. The wide spectrum of multidrug resistance 3 deficiency: from neonatal cholestasis to cirrhosis of adulthood. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(6):1448–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang LJ, Wang XH, Knisely AS, Yu H, Lu Y, Liu LY, et al. Chinese children with chronic intrahepatic cholestasis and high γ-glutamyl transpeptidase: clinical features and association with ABCB4 mutations. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55(2):150–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khabou B, Mahjoub B, Barbu V, Balhoudi N, Wardani A, Sfar MT, et al. Phenotypic variability in Tunisian PFIC3 patients harboring a complex genotype with a differential clinical outcome of UDCA treatment. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:122–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schatz SB, Jüngst C, Keitel-Anselmo V, Kubitz R, Becker C, Gerner P, et al. Phenotypic spectrum and diagnostic pitfalls of ABCB4 deficiency depending on age of onset. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2(5):504–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Hussaini A, Lone K, Bashir MS, Alrashidi S, Fagih M, Alanazi A, et al. ATP8B1, ABCB11, and ABCB4 genes defects: novel mutations associated with cholestasis with different phenotypes and outcomes. J Pediatr. 2021;236:113-23.e2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen HL, Chang PS, Hsu HC, Lee JH, Ni YH, Hsu HY, et al. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis with high gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase levels in Taiwanese infants: role of MDR3 gene defect? Pediatr Res. 2001;50(1):50–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Giovannoni I, Santorelli FM, Candusso M, Di Rocco M, Bellacchio E, Callea F, et al. Two novel mutations in African and Asian children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(7):567–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kubitz R, Bode J, Erhardt A, Graf D, Kircheis G, Müller-Stöver I, et al. Cholestatic liver diseases from child to adult: the diversity of MDR3 disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2011;49(6):728–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dzagania T, Engelmann G, Häussinger D, Schmitt L, Flechtenmacher C, Rtskhiladze I, et al. The histidine-loop is essential for transport activity of human MDR3. A novel mutation of MDR3 in a patient with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. Gene. 2012;506(1):141–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramraj R, Finegold MJ, Karpen SJ. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3: overlapping presentation with Wilson disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(7):689–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordo-Gilart R, Andueza S, Hierro L, Martínez-Fernández P, D’Agostino D, Jara P, et al. Functional analysis of ABCB4 mutations relates clinical outcomes of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 to the degree of MDR3 floppase activity. Gut. 2015;64(1):147–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun HZ, Shi H, Zhang SC, Shen XZ. Novel mutation in a Chinese patient with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(2):699–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Boga S, Jain D, Schilsky ML. Presentation of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 mimicking Wilson disease: molecular genetic diagnosis and response to treatment. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2015;18(3):202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delaunay JL, Durand-Schneider AM, Dossier C, Falguières T, Gautherot J, Davit-Spraul A, et al. A functional classification of ABCB4 variations causing progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. Hepatology. 2016;63(5):1620–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Deng M, Guo L, Song Y. clinical and genetic analysis of a family affected by progressive familial intraphepatic cholestasis type 3. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2018;35(5):686–90.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li A, Dong Y, Xu Z, Wang F, Wang L, Yan J, et al. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3: a report of two cases in one pedigree. J Clin Hepatol. 2020;36(7):1601–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saleem K, Cui Q, Zaib T, Zhu S, Qin Q, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation of a novel missense mutation in gene causing progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. Dis Mark. 2020;2020:6292818.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang W, Lin R, Lu Z, Sheng H, Xu Y, Li X, et al. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis in South China. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020;23(6):558–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai J, Li L, Liu H, Liu S, Bai L, Ning H, et al. A novel compound heterozygous mutation in ABCB4 gene in a pedigree with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 3: a case report. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(5):426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipiński P, Ciara E, Jurkiewicz D, Płoski R, Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska M, Pawłowska J, et al. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3: report of four clinical cases, novel ABCB4 variants and long-term follow-up. Ann Hepatol. 2021;25: 100342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Küçükçongar Yavaş A, Çavdarlı B, Ünal Uzun Ö, Uncuoğlu A, Gündüz M. A novel etiologic factor of highly elevated cholestanol levels: progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020;33(5):665–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Degiorgio D, Corsetto PA, Rizzo AM, Colombo C, Seia M, Costantino L, et al. Two ABCB4 point mutations of strategic NBD-motifs do not prevent protein targeting to the plasma membrane but promote MDR3 dysfunction. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(5):633–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Morita SY, Kobayashi A, Takanezawa Y, Kioka N, Handa T, Arai H, et al. Bile salt-dependent efflux of cellular phospholipids mediated by ATP binding cassette protein B4. Hepatology. 2007;46(1):188–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Park HJ, Kim TH, Kim SW, Noh SH, Cho KJ, Choi C, et al. Functional characterization of ABCB4 mutations found in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Prescher M, Kroll T, Schmitt L. ABCB4/MDR3 in health and disease–at the crossroads of biochemistry and medicine. Biol Chem. 2019;400(10):1245–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Delaunay JL, Bruneau A, Hoffmann B, Durand-Schneider AM, Barbu V, Jacquemin E, et al. Functional defect of variants in the adenosine triphosphate–binding sites of ABCB4 and their rescue by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator potentiator, ivacaftor (VX-770). Hepatology. 2017;65(2):560–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stättermayer AF, Halilbasic E, Wrba F, Ferenci P, Trauner M. Variants in ABCB4 (MDR3) across the spectrum of cholestatic liver diseases in adults. J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):651–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lonardo A, Romagnoli D. Gamma glutamyl transferase: a novel cardiovascular outfit for an old liver test. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143(1):4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sotil EU, Jensen DM. Serum enzymes associated with cholestasis. Clin Liver Dis. 2004;8(1):41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. van Mil SW, Houwen RH, Klomp LW. Genetics of familial intrahepatic cholestasis syndromes. J Med Genet. 2005;42(6):449–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Davit-Spraul A, Gonzales E, Baussan C, Jacquemin E. The spectrum of liver diseases related to ABCB4 gene mutations: pathophysiology and clinical aspects. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(2):134–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. van der Woerd WL, Houwen RH, van de Graaf SF. Current and future therapies for inherited cholestatic liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(5):763–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen HL, Wu SH, Hsu SH, Liou BY, Chen HL, Chang MH. Jaundice revisited: recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of inherited cholestatic liver diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vitale G, Gitto S, Vukotic R, Raimondi F, Andreone P. Familial intrahepatic cholestasis: new and wide perspectives. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(7):922–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jhaveri MA, Kowdley KV. New developments in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis–role of obeticholic acid. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:1053–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Manley S, Ding W. Role of farnesoid X receptor and bile acids in alcoholic liver disease. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015;5(2):158–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Colombo C, Vajro P, Degiorgio D, Coviello DA, Costantino L, Tornillo L, et al. Clinical features and genotype-phenotype correlations in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 related to ABCB4 mutations. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52(1):73–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Englert C, Grabhorn E, Richter A, Rogiers X, Burdelski M, Ganschow R. Liver transplantation in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Transplantation. 2007;84(10):1361–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wei G, Cao J, Huang P, An P, Badlani D, Vaid KA, et al. Synthetic human ABCB4 mRNA therapy rescues severe liver disease phenotype in a BALB/c.Abcb4 mouse model of PFIC3. J Hepatol. 2021;74(6):1416–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the families of the patients for their cooperation and participation in this study.

Funding

This study got financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81974057), the Clinical Frontier Technology Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, China (No. JNU1AF-CFTP-2022-a01228) and Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou city (No. 202201020088).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Rong Chen and Feng-Xia Yang have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China

    Rong Chen, Mei Deng, Hua Li & Yuan-Zong Song

  2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510120, China

    Feng-Xia Yang & Yi Xu

  3. Department of Hepatopathy, Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha, 410007, China

    Yan-Fang Tan & Wen-Xian Ouyang

Authors
  1. Rong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng-Xia Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan-Fang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mei Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wen-Xian Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuan-Zong Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RC,YZS, YFT, FXY performed data collection of all patients; RC drafted the original manuscript; FXY helped conduct the literature review; YZS conceptualized and designed the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; MD and HL conducted variant interpretation and reviewed the manuscript; YZS, WXOY, YX managed and followed up the pediatric patients. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wen-Xian Ouyang or Yuan-Zong Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, and written informed consents were signed by the parents of all patients before this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Figure S1. ABCB4 genotypes of the 12 unrelated families on Sangersequencing or next generation sequencing. Arrows indicated the mutations. Since Sangervalidation through forward sequencing or reverse sequencing, the base of the peak map maybe the reverse complemen tation sequence of the base detected.

Additional file 2

. Table S1. Clinical and molecular genetic data of previously reported 82 PFIC3 patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, R., Yang, FX., Tan, YF. et al. Clinical and genetic characterization of pediatric patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3): identification of 14 novel ABCB4 variants and review of the literatures. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 445 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02597-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02597-y

Keywords

  • Progress familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3)
  • ABCB4 gene
  • Novel variants

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172