Skip to main content

Autophagy-lysosome pathway alteration in ocular surface manifestations in Fabry disease patients

Abstract

Background

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked, lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the alpha-galactosidase gene and characterized by neurological, cutaneous, renal, cardiovascular, cochleo-vestibular and ocular manifestations. The aim of this study is to characterize morphological, functional and autophagy-lysosome pathway alterations of the ocular surface in FD patients.

Methods

Eleven subjects with a diagnosis of FD and fifteen healthy control subjects were examined. All patients underwent ocular surface slit lamp examination, corneal aesthesiometry and in vivo confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CCM). Conjunctival impression cytology was performed in six FD patients and six controls, to assess for expression of two markers of the autophagy-lysosome pathway: the microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) and lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2).

Results

Cornea verticillata and increased conjunctival vessel tortuosity were detected respectively in 67% and 33% of patients with FD. Compared with healthy subjects, patients affected by FD showed a significant reduction in corneal nerve fiber length, density and nerve branching on CCM and a significantly increased expression of LC3 on conjunctival impression cytology (p < 0.001). No changes were observed in the conjunctival expression of LAMP2 between the two groups.

Conclusions

This study shows that FD is associated with ocular surface alterations including corneal and conjunctival morphology, innervation and vascularization changes. Our data demonstrate an increased expression of LC3 protein in patients with FD, suggesting that alteration of the autophagy-lysosome pathway may play a role in the occurrence of ocular manifestations.

Background

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, X-linked, lysosomal storage disorder characterized by total or partial functional deficiency of the enzyme α-galactosidase A, caused by mutations in the α-galactosidase A gene (GLA). A reduction or absence of activity of this enzyme determines an altered metabolism of glycosphingolipids, such as Globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) [1,2,3] and galabiosilceramide [1], and progressive accumulation of these molecules in several organs including heart, kidney, eyes, brain and skin [1,2,3,4,5]. Patients may develop renal failure, cardiomyopathy and cerebrovascular disease, leading to a short life expectancy [6]. According to data from the Fabry Registry (2008), affected patients have a shorter life expectancy compared to the general population in the United States (58.2 years vs. 74.7 years for males, 75.4 years vs 80.0 years for females), with cardiovascular disease being the most common cause of death [7].

The estimated incidence in the United States is between 1:40,000 and 1:117,000 live births for males [6, 8, 9].

Ocular manifestations are observed in most FD patients, and involve the cornea, conjunctiva, lens and retina [10,11,12,13]. The most frequent ocular sign, and sometimes the only sign in heterozygous females, is cornea verticillata, a yellow–brown whorl-like opacity at the inferior part of the cornea caused by the storage of glycolipids within the basal corneal epithelial cells [3, 4, 14,15,16,17]. Conjunctival and retinal vessels also exhibit an increased tortuosity and aneurysmal dilatations caused by accumulation of glycosphingolipids in the endothelial cells [2, 18,19,20,21]. Less frequently, patients with FD also present a typical lens opacity with a “spoke-like” pattern at the level of the posterior capsule, usually called “Fabry cataract”; another type of lens opacity that may develop at the level of the anterior capsule is characterized by wedge-shaped white granular deposits [3, 15]. Other ocular manifestations, such as angiokeratomas of the eyelid, periorbital edema, papilledema, optical atrophy [1, 3, 5], and damage of the corneal nerves have been described [22, 23].

Currently there is on average a 15-year delay in the diagnosis of FD, due to the lack of awareness about the disease and non-specific symptoms [6, 24]. The diagnosis is based on a thorough family history, on the evaluation of enzymatic activity of alpha-galactosidase A on leukocytes and plasma [25]; the evaluation of Gb3 levels in serum and urine [26], and on cardiac and renal biopsies [2]. Therefore, novel, non-invasive, early biomarkers of FD are highly sought-after, in order to increase our understanding of the mechanisms underlying FD and to improve the management of this challenging condition. An involvement of the autophagy-lysosome pathway in the development of multisystemic damage in FD, has been recently described [27]. Nelson et al. reported widespread alterations in the autophagy-lysosome pathway associated to neurodegenerative phenotype in the brain of a mouse model of alpha-galactosidase A deficiency: notably, microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), a marker of autophagic vacuoles, was substantially increased in multiple brain regions, and likewise, lysosome-associated membrane protein LAMP-1, a lysosomal marker, was increased also in vascular endothelial cells, suggesting an aberrant autophagy process in FD [27].

Chung et al. observed that the altered autophagy typically found in this disease could play a role in renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis and suggest that this pathway should be studied as a new therapeutic target in FD [28]. This study aims to characterize ocular surface alterations in patients with FD including conjunctival changes of autophagy pathway in order to identify potential, non-invasive biomarkers of FD.

Methods

Eleven patients with clinical and biochemical diagnosis of FD, confirmed by genetic tests showing mutations on the GLA gene were included in the study (six males and five females; mean age 45,8 ± 18,7 years). In addition, 15 healthy, sex and age matched subjects were included as a control group. Patients who were contact lens users, and/or who were affected by ocular or systemic diseases which may influence clinical and biological examinations, and/or who were in treatment with topical ophthalmic drugs were excluded from the study.

All subjects underwent the following ophthalmological examination: (i) slit lamp biomicroscopy to detect anterior segment abnormalities including the presence of cornea verticillata and conjunctival vessels tortuosity, (ii) assessment of corneal sensitivity by Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer [29], and (iii) confocal in vivo laser-scanning microscopy to evaluate changes in corneal innervation and reflectivity at the basal epithelial cells layer.

Conjunctival impression cytology was also performed in six FD patients and in six controls to evaluate the expression of LC3 and lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMP) 2 proteins.

Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CCM)

All subjects underwent examination with a CCM (Rostock Corneal Module/Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). One eye of each FD patient and healthy subject, was randomly selected for examination and anesthetized with one drop of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4%. A large drop of gel was applied to the tip of the lens, and another small amount of gel was applied to the front surface of the Tomocap; the instrument was aligned with the center of the cornea, and advanced forward until it touched the cornea.

The entire corneal epithelium was scanned in order to find an increased reflectivity of the layers, suggesting the presence of Gb3 deposits; going even deeper, the subepithelial corneal nerve plexus was evaluated. The images obtained were evaluated by a masked operator (P.M.) who selected the most representative images of the plexus of each subject and evaluated using NeuronJ (ImageScience): (1) the corneal nerve fiber length (NFL), calculated as the total length of all nerve fibers and branches per scan area (mm−1); (2) the corneal nerve fiber density (NFD), measured as the total number of major nerve fibers per scan area (mm−2); and (3) the corneal nerve branch density (NBD), calculated as the number of branches emanating from all major nerve trunks per scan area (mm−2).

Conjunctival impression cytology

Conjunctival impression cytology was performed in six FD patients and in the control group, by applying a methylcellulose disk to the bulbar temporal and nasal conjunctiva, after instillation of topical oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% [30].

The collected samples were evaluated by immunohistochemistry to investigate the expression of LC3 and LAMP2 proteins.

Briefly, samples were hydrated in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the endogenous peroxidase block was performed by incubating the cells for 3 min with 3% hydrogen peroxide. They were subsequently incubated for one hour at room temperature with goat serum (NGS) diluted in 10% PBS, and finally incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies (LC3, Santa Cruz, sc-28266; LAMP2, Santa Cruz, sc-18822). The following day, they were incubated sequentially with a secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and with a streptavidin / peroxidase complex (Vectastain Universal QUICK HRP R.T.U., Vector). The immune complexes were visualized through ImmPACT DAB (Vector). The electronic images were acquired through bright field microscopy and collected in CS5 Adobe Photoshop format. The densitometries related to the immunopositivity of the photographed fields were made through the ImageJ Software for Windows program.

Statistics

Quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. The qualitative variables were expressed as percentages. To verify the existence of statistically significant differences in measured values of corneal sensitivity, corneal nerve morphology parameters and LC3 and LAMP2 protein expression between patients with FD and healthy subjects, an independent samples t-test was used. Spearman-rho test was used to evaluate the correlation between the variation of nerve morphology parameters evaluated and corneal sensitivity values. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Eight patients (70%) with FD showed cornea verticillata. Four patients (35%) with FD showed increased conjunctival vessels tortuosity in the inferior part of bulbar conjunctiva at slit lamp examination. (Fig. 1). Patients with FD showed significant decrease of corneal sensitivity when compared with healthy controls (5.58 ± 0.30 vs 5.92 ± 0.13 cm, p = 0.0325).

Fig. 1
figure 1

“Cornea verticillata and conjunctival vessels tortuosity” Slit lamp bio-microscopy image of a patient with FD showing the presence of cornea verticillata (a), a yellow–brown, whorl-like opacity caused by the storage of glycolipids within the basal corneal epithelial cells, and the increased tortuosity and aneurysmal dilatations of conjunctival vessels caused by accumulation of glycosphingolipids in the endothelial cells (b). Healthy cornea (c) and conjunctival vessels (d) of a control subject

The in vivo corneal confocal microscopy examination showed an increase of reflectivity at the basal cells layer of the corneal epithelium in all FD patients when compared with the control group in 18% of patients with FD. Patients with FD showed significant decrease of NFL, NFD and NBD when compared with healthy subjects (NFL: FD: 8,53 ± 2,94 vs healthy controls 11,84 ± 3.73 mm-1, p = 0.040; NFD: FD: 25 ± 10.46 vs healthy controls 52.78 ± 20,98 fibers/mm2, p = 0.001; NBD: FD: 13,07 ± 8.59 vs healthy controls 40,28 ± 17,43 branches/mm2, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

“In vivo corneal confocal microscopy in Fabry Disease” In vivo corneal confocal microscopy examination showed significant decrease of NFL, NFD and NBD of the sub-basal nervous plexus (a) and an increase of reflectivity at the basal cells layer of the corneal epithelium due to intracellular highly reflective irregular material (b) in a patient with FD. Normal sub-basal nervous plexus (c) and normal reflectivity of the basal cells layer of corneal epithelium (d) of a healthy subject

Although corneal sensitivity values measured by Cochet Bonnet aesthesiometer did not significantly correlate with NFL values (p = 0.02, R = 0.74), changes of corneal nerve morphology were significantly correlated with the decrease of corneal sensitivity: NFD (p < 0.001, R = 1,00), NBD (p = 0.0003, R = 0.99).

Immunohistochemistry of conjunctival impression cytology samples identified a statistically significant increase in mean expression of LC3 between the FD group and the control group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the expression of LAMP2 was detected (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

“LC3 and LAMP2 expression on conjunctival epithelium” Immunohistochemistry of conjunctival impression cytology samples identified a statistically significant increase in mean expression of LC3 in FD group (a) when compared with healthy control group (b), while no statistically significant difference were observed in mean expression of LAMP2 between FD (c) healthy subjects (d)

Discussion

The aim of this study was to characterize the ocular surface alterations in FD patients and to address the involvement of the autophagy-lysosome pathway alterations.

Our study confirmed the high frequency of clinical ocular alterations in FD such as cornea verticillata (70%) and increased of conjunctival vessels tortuosity (35%). Currently, cornea verticillata is considered the ocular hallmark of FD. The observation of an increased conjunctival vessels tortuosity, mainly located at the inferior part of bulbar conjunctiva, in 35% of FD patients is in line with previous data and related to the progressive accumulation of Gb3 in endothelial cells [18,19,20,21].

Our data also showed that approximately 20% of FD patients had an increased reflectivity of the basal cells layer of corneal epithelium, as detected by CCM, suggesting a possible employment of this diagnostic technique to improve the identification of the Gb3 deposits [4, 5, 16, 17]. Moreover, CCM showed marked alteration of the subepithelial corneal nerve plexus in patients with FD. Interestingly, the changes of corneal nerve morphology correlated with an impairment of corneal sensitivity, supporting the hypothesis to use these techniques to perform an early diagnosis of small-fiber neuropathy in FD patients, as suggested for diabetic neuropathy [22, 23].

Immunohistochemistry performed on conjunctival impression cytology samples showed increased levels of LC3 protein in FD patients when compared with the control group.

An increased expression of autophagosome LC3 protein, due to impaired autophagic function, is a common observation in lysosomal storage disorders, such as Fabry disease, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry performed on renal biopsy samples [27]. The autophagic vacuoles contain undegraded material accumulated within the cells. This material, that has a lamellar appearance, appears to be similar to the one found in other cell lines of patients suffering from Fabry disease [31]. In this study, we observed an increased expression of LC3 in the conjunctival epithelium of FD patients, confirming the hypothesis of an increased number of autophagic vacuoles in conjunctival cells, analogously to those found in renal cells of FD patients.

Our results did not show significant changes of conjunctival levels of LAMP2, although an increase in the expression of this protein in phagocytes of Fabry patients has been previously demonstrated [32]. This contrasting data suggest that the autophagic and lysosomal pathways of conjunctival epithelial cells are quite different from other cell types. Notably, it is possible to hypothesize that the LAMP2 turnover could be slower, and the protein levels more stable, leading to difficult detection of protein variation in conjunctival epithelium.

Conclusion

This study highlights the marked alteration of the ocular surface in FD patients and suggests to further evaluate the clinical use of CCM and conjunctival impression cytology, two simple/non-invasive diagnostic techniques, to monitor Fabry disease progression and response to treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FD:

Fabry disease

CCM:

Confocal laser-scanning microscopy

LC3:

(Microtubule-associated protein) light chain 3

LAMP2:

Lysosome-associated membrane protein 2

GLA:

α-Galactosidase A gene

Gb3:

Globotriaosylceramide

NFL:

Nerve fiber length

NFD:

Nerve fiber density

NBD:

Nerve branching density

References

  1. Tuttolomondo A, Pecoraro R, Simonetta I, Miceli S, Pinto A, Licata G. Anderson-Fabry disease: a multiorgan disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(33):5974–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ortiz A, Germain DP, Desnick RJ, et al. Fabry disease revisited: Management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123(4):416–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen TT, Gin T, Nicholls K, Low M, Galanos J, Crawford A. Ophthalmological manifestations of Fabry disease: a survey of patients at the Royal Melbourne Fabry Disease Treatment Centre. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(2):164–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Lanzini M, Carpineto P, Toto L, Ciancaglini M. Corneal and conjunctival manifestations in Fabry disease: in vivo confocal microscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(4):709–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sodi A, Ioannidis AS, Mehta A, Davey C, Beck M, Pitz S. Ocular manifestations of Fabry’s disease: data from the Fabry outcome survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(2):210–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehta A, Ricci R, Widmer U, et al. Fabry disease defined: baseline clinical manifestations of 366 patients in the Fabry outcome survey. Eur J Clin Invest. 2004;34(3):236–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waldek S, Patel M, Banikazemi M, et al. Life expectancy and cause of death in males and females with Fabry disease: findings from the Fabry registry. Genet Med. 2009;11:790–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Desnick RJ, Ioannou YA, Eng CM. α-Galactosidase a deficiency: Fabry disease. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2001. p. 3733–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, et al. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA. 1999;281:249–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Germain DP. Maladie de Fabry (déficit en alpha-galactosidase A): physiopathologie, signes cliniques et aspects génétiques [Fabry’s disease (alpha-galactosidase-A deficiency): physiopathology, clinical signs, and genetic aspects]. J Soc Biol. 2002;196(2):161–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauser AC, Lorenz M, Sunder-Plassmann G. The expanding clinical spectrum of Anderson-Fabry disease: a challenge to diagnosis in the novel era of enzyme replacement therapy. J Intern Med. 2004;255(6):629–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Masson C, Cissé I, Simon V, Insalaco P, Audran M. Fabry disease: a review. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71(5):381–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dufier JL, Gubler MC, Dhermy P, Lenoir G, Paupe J, Haye C. La maladie de Fabry et ses manifestations ophtalmologiques [Fabry’s disease in ophthalmology (author’s transl)]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1980;3(11):625–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roussel T, Grutzmacher R, Coster D. Patterns of superficial keratopathy. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1984;12(4):301–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sher NA, Letson RD, Desnick RJ. The ocular manifestations in Fabry’s disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(4):671–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuppurainen K, Collan Y, Rantanen T, Hollmen A. Fabry’s disease and cornea verticillata. A report of 3 cases. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1981;59(5):674–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macrae WG, Ghosh M, McCulloch C. Corneal changes in Fabry’s disease: a clinico-pathologic case report of a heterozygote. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1985;5(3):185–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Libert J, Toussaint D. Tortuosities of retinal and conjunctival vessels in lysosomal storage diseases. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1982;18(6):347–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCulloch C, Ghosh M. Ultrastructural changes in the cornea and conjunctiva of a heterozygous woman with Fabry’s disease. Can J Ophthalmol. 1984;19(4):192–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riegel EM, Pokorny KS, Friedman AH, Suhan J, Ritch RH, Desnick RJ. Ocular pathology of Fabry’s disease in a hemizygous male following renal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;26(5):247–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dantas MA, Fonseca RA, Kaga T, Yannuzzi LA, Spaide RF. Retinal and choroidal vascular changes in heterozygous Fabry disease. Retina. 2001;21(1):87–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tavakoli M, Marshall A, Thompson L, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive means to diagnose neuropathy in patients with Fabry disease. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40(6):976–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bitirgen G, Turkmen K, Malik RA, Ozkagnici A, Zengin N. Corneal confocal microscopy detects corneal nerve damage and increased dendritic cells in Fabry disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ries M, Ramaswami U, Parini R, et al. The early clinical phenotype of Fabry disease: a study on 35 European children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(11):767–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gelb MH, Turecek F, Scott CR, Chamoles NA. Direct multiplex assay of enzymes in dried blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry for the newborn screening of lysosomal storage disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2006;29(2–3):397–404.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Linthorst GE, De Rie MA, Tjiam KH, Aerts JM, Dingemans KP, Hollak CE. Misdiagnosis of Fabry disease: importance of biochemical confirmation of clinical or pathological suspicion. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(3):575–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nelson MP, Tse TE, O’Quinn DB, Percival SM, Jaimes EA, Warnock DG, Shacka JJ. Autophagy-lysosome pathway associated neuropathology and axonal degeneration in the brains of alpha-galactosidase A-deficient mice. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;14(2):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chung S, Son M, Chae Y, Oh S, Koh ES, Kim YK, Shin SJ, Park CW, Jung SC, Kim HS. Fabry disease exacerbates renal interstitial fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction via impaired autophagy and enhanced apoptosis. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2021;40(2):208–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sacchetti M, Lambiase A. Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:571–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moramarco A, Sacchetti M, Franzone F, Segatto M, Cecchetti D, Miraglia E, Roberti V, Iacovino C, Giustini S. Ocular surface involvement in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(8):1757–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chévrier M, Brakch N, Céline L, et al. Autophagosome maturation is impaired in FABY disease. Autophagy. 2010;6(5):589–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pereira EM, do Monte SJ, do Nascimento FF, et al. Lysosome-associated protein 1 (LAMP-1) and lysosome-associated protein 2 (LAMP-2) in a larger family carrier of Fabry disease. Gene. 2014;536(1):118–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The authors deny any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.M: conception, design of the work, analysis, interpretation of data, draft the work, revised manuscript. M.S: conception, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, revised manuscript. M.Sa. conception, design of the work, analysis, interpretation of data, draft the work, revised manuscript. P.M.: conception, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, draft the work, revised manuscript. F.G.: conception, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, draft the work, revised manuscript. R.P.: conception, acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, revised manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Sacchetti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marenco, M., Segatto, M., Sacchetti, M. et al. Autophagy-lysosome pathway alteration in ocular surface manifestations in Fabry disease patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02441-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02441-3

Keywords

  • Fabry disease
  • Lysosomal storage disorder
  • Cornea
  • Autophagy-lysosome pathway
  • LC3 protein