Skip to main content

Clinical and genetic spectrum of primary ciliary dyskinesia in Chinese patients: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) represents a highly heterogenous disorder with extensive clinical and genetic patterns among populations of different geographic location and ethnic origin. However, data about Chinese patients are limited. We aimed to summarize the clinical and genetic spectrum of Chinese PCD patients based on all available literatures.

Methods

We searched Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science and Chinese databases including CNKI, SinoMed and Wanfang from 1981 to 2021, to identify articles reporting patients with PCD in China, which had included information about transmission electron microscopy and/or genetic testing.

Results

A total of 244 Chinese PCD patients in 52 articles were included. Of these patients, the mean age was 13.1 years, and 55 patients (22.5%) were diagnosed with PCD after 18 years old. Compared with patients diagnosed with PCD in childhood or infancy, patients diagnosed with PCD in adulthood had a higher prevalence of chronic wet cough, sinusitis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolation and radiological bronchiectasis as well as worse lung function. 25 PCD-related genes were identified in 142 patients, and DNAH5, DNAH11, CCDC39 and CCDC40 were the most frequently detected mutations. More than half of genetic variants were loss-of-function mutations, and the majority of these variants were seen only once. Correlations between PCD phenotype, genotype and ciliary ultrastructure were also evidenced.

Conclusions

Diagnostic delay and under-recognition of PCD remain a big issue in China, which contributes to progressive lung disease and PA infection indicating worse outcome. Specialist equipment and expertise are urgently required to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of PCD.

Trial registry

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42021257804; URL:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/

Introduction

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD, OMIM ID: 244,400) is a rare autosomal-recessive or X-linked disorder caused by mutations in genes that encode the specific structure or function of motile cilia [1]. Characteristics of PCD are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, but all associated with abnormal motile ciliary function. Patients with PCD typically manifest with unexplained neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), chronic wet cough, sinusitis, otitis media, laterality disorders, infertility and almost 100% concomitant with bronchiectasis in adulthood [2, 3].

As with many rare diseases, the diagnosis of PCD is challenging and requires a multi-test diagnostic approach since no single test has adequate sensitivity or specificity [4]. Both the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines agreed that a diagnosis of PCD can be ascertained if a hallmark ciliary ultrastructural defect observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or biallelic pathogenic variants in a known PCD gene were identified, with nasal nitric oxide (nNO) being recommended as the initial diagnostic tool in light of its costs and accessibility [5, 6]. Recently, delineation of genotype–phenotype relationships has been emerged in patients with PCD [7]. For example, patients with absent inner dynein arm with microtubular disorganization who harbor a CCDC39 or CCDC40 mutation, have worse lung function compared with patients with outer dynein arm defects and DNAH5 mutation. In contrast, patients with RSPH1 mutations appear to have mild lung function impairment [8, 9]. However, caution is needed when interpreting these genotype–phenotype data based on a small number of patients.

The estimated prevalence of PCD is 1:10,000–1:20,000 in Europeans, while the higher prevalence has been reported in the British Asian population [7, 10]. Considering the large population of China and high prevalence of bronchiectasis, PCD patients might be not as rare as we previously thought [11]. However, studies about PCD in China are mainly from case report and small case series due to multiple factors, including but not limited to a low awareness of PCD amongst physicians, highly heterogeneous symptoms of PCD, the lack of diagnostic facilities as well as the existing misconception that identification of PCD makes a little difference to the management of patients with bronchiectasis. Recently, several relatively larger case series have showed that the clinical manifestations, ciliary phenotypes, and genetic spectrum of Chinese PCD are highly diverse and might have some distinct features compared to those observed in Caucasians, which has enhanced our understanding about PCD in Chinese patients [12, 13]. Interestingly, one recent study in PCD has revealed a striking genetic stratification through multigene panel by next-generation sequencing according to the population of different origins [14]. This highlights the importance of describing the clinical characteristics and genetic spectrums of PCD in different geographic and ethnic regions, including in China, which could have important implications for clinical management and future research.

To raise awareness and improve management of PCD in China, we conducted a systematic review aiming to: (1) summarize the clinical manifestations, ciliary phenotype and mutation spectrum of Chinese PCD patients; (2) delineate the relationships between genotype, phenotype and ciliary ultrastructure, based on all available data.

Methods

Data sources and search strategy

Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science and Chinese databases including CKNI, SinoMed and Wanfang were searched electronically to identify studies reporting PCD cases in Chinese patients published in English or Chinese from January 1981 to May 2021. The search strategy included the following key terms: (‘primary ciliary dyskinesia’ OR ‘Kartagener syndrome’ OR ‘immotile cilia syndrome’) AND (‘Chinese’ OR ‘China’ OR ‘Han population’). The electronic searches were supplemented by manual screening of the reference lists of all accepted articles to identify additional studies which were not included in the initial search. We restricted our search to articles published since 1981, as older studies are rarely available online and many things have changed for the diagnostic modalities of PCD, with TEM and/or genetic test being increasingly used. [15]

Definition of PCD patients

Based on current guidelines, the diagnosis of PCD can be confirmed by the identification of a hallmark defect of ciliary ultrastructure observed by TEM or bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in a known PCD gene, with measurement of nNO being recommended as a screening tool. Kartagener’s syndrome is a type of PCD that is characterized by situs inversus, chronic sinusitis, and bronchiectasis [5, 6]. To better understand the relationship between phenotype, ciliary ultrastructure and genotype in Chinese patients, we only included studies which have reported the TEM and/or genetic results. The diagnostic strategies for PCD were determined by the authors in each study.

Article selection

Two investigators (BP and JQX) independently screened the eligible studies based on title and abstract of all identified articles according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with discrepancies resolved by consensus discussion of BP, JQX and YHG. Studies were included if they met all the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of PCD, Kartagener syndrome or immotile cilia syndrome; (2) patients with Chinese origin; 3) available TEM and/or genetic data. The exclusion criteria included: (1) wrong study type (i.e. reviews, conference abstracts, commentaries and editorials); (2) studies without peer review. Patients overlap among studies are likely to exist because most studies on PCD are performed in a limited number of centers in China. When PCD patients are reported more than once by the same center with overlapping inclusion periods, only the largest studies were included.

Data extraction

Data was extracted from all eligible articles using standardized excel forms. Data retrieved from the studies were as follows: (1) study characteristics: paper’s title, first author, year of publication, study location, the number of PCD patients; (2) baseline information of patients: gender, age at onset of symptoms, age at diagnosis, family history; (3) clinical characteristics: history of NRDS, respiratory symptoms, sinus disease, otitis media, hearing impairment, viscera situs, infertility and other comorbidities; (4) laboratory investigations: spirometry, respiratory culture, nNO measurement, TEM analysis, high-speed video analysis (HSVA), saccharin test, immunofluorescence test, genetic testing and radiological features. The methods for medical history ascertainment were determined by the authors in each study. Regarding past history, symptoms, and comorbidities, we opted to record as “no” if it was not reported in the included studies. The age at onset of symptoms was not clearly described in many articles, instead of using terms such as “about 10 years ago” or “childhood”, as an alternative. We therefore categorized patients into three groups about the age at onset of symptoms: infancy (< 1 year), childhood (1–17 years) and adulthood (≥ 18 years).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22), and GraphPad Prism (version 6.07). Data were presented as mean (standard deviation, SD), median (interquartile range, IQR) or count (proportion), as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared test. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired t tests or Mann–Whitney test when appropriate. All analyses were two-sided with P < 0.05 considering as a statistical significance. The review protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO, number CRD42021257804.

Results

Search attrition

The process of inclusion and exclusion of studies was shown in Fig. 1. We extracted 1935 abstracts or articles after retrieval, and 536 were screened for eligibility while 1399 duplicate documents were removed. Upon further review, 454 records were excluded according to the title and abstract. Of 82 articles for full-text review, 52 articles (24 in English and 28 in Chinese) with 244 PCD patients were included in the final analysis, [12, 13, 12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65] and the excluded articles are listed in online supplement (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among them, only 3 articles reported 10 or more patients [12, 13, 43], and the remaining were case reports or small case series [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,42, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Geographically, 5 patients were from Hong Kong, one from Taiwan, and the remaining from mainland China. Interestingly, pediatric department reported 72.5% of the PCD cases whilst adult pulmonology reported only 15.2% of the cases (Fig. 2). The study characteristics of each included articles are listed in online supplement (Table S2 is changed to Additional file 1: Table S2). The clinical characteristics and laboratory investigations of patients who had a clinical diagnosis of PCD in excluded articles after full text review were summarized in Table S2 is changed to Additional file 1: Table S3 (online supplement for details).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A flow chart showing the procedure for identifying the studies included in the systematic review

Fig. 2
figure 2

Department distribution of diagnosed PCD and the number of reported cases. ENT = ear-nose-throat

Clinical manifestations of Chinese patients

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 244 PCD patients were summarized in Table 1. Of these patients, 116 (47.5%) were female, 120 (49.2%) had situs inversus totalis or heterotaxy and 189 (77.5%) were diagnosed with PCD before 18 years old. With regard to the age of symptom onset, 120 (49.2%) were in their infancy, 85 (34.8%) in childhood and 3 (1.2%) in adulthood. In 237 patients whose age at diagnosis was clearly stated, the mean age was 13.1 years old. Of 55 adult patients, 23 (41.8%) had a history of infertility. The common manifestations were chronic wet cough (92.2%), rhinosinusitis (84.0%), otitis media (27.5%), hearing impairment (20.9%) and the common comorbidities were asthma (11.5%), thoracic deformity (7.0%), congenital heart disease (4.5%), and gastroesophageal reflux (3.7%). Other comorbidities included post infectious bronchiolitis obliterans (2.5%), congenital deafness (1.2%) and diffuse pan-bronchiolitis (0.8%).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics and laboratory results of Chinese PCD patients categorized by age at diagnosis

Microbiological results were available in 133 patients. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (27.1%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.5%), Haemophilus influenza (16.5%), and Staphylococcus aureus (5.3%). Of 233 patients who had radiographic data, 164 had bronchiectasis, 88 had atelectasis and 29 had diffuse nodules. Regarding lung function, the mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 70.6% of the predicted value in 45 patients.

Compared with patients who were diagnosed with PCD before 18 years old, patients diagnosed with PCD in adulthood had a higher prevalence of PCD family history, chronic wet cough, sinusitis, diffuse pan-bronchiolitis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, radiological bronchiectasis and had a worse lung function, with contrasting lower prevalence of NRDS, otitis media, Streptococcus pneumoniae isolate and radiological atelectasis.

Genetic spectrums and ciliary characteristics

Regarding genetic spectrum, 25 PCD-related genes were identified in 142 individuals. Of these patients, 105 had compound heterozygous mutations, 27 had homozygous mutations, 6 had X-linked recessive gene mutations and 4 had no gene mutations. Among all the variants, more than half of these variants were loss of function mutations, including frameshift (26.7%), nonsense (21.0%), splicing (9.9%) and deletion (2.9%). DNAH5, DNAH11, CCDC39, CCDC40, HYDIN, CCNO and DNAAF3 were the most frequently identified genes, with a prevalence of 21.1%, 18.3%, 9.2%, 6.3%, 4.9%, 4.9% and 4.9%, respectively, as showed in Fig. 3A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A-Distribution of genetic mutations in 142 cases; B-Distribution of TEM analysis in 160 cases; C-Distribution of HSVA analysis in 48 cases. TEM = transmission electron microscopy; HSVA = high-speed video analysis; ODA = outer dynein arms; IDA = inner dynein arms; MTD = microtubular disarrangement; CA = central apparatus

Of 160 patients who had TEM data, the absence of the outer and inner dynein arm (ODA/IDA), absence of outer dynein arm (ODA), and the microtubular disorganization with defects of inner dynein arm and central apparatus (MTD/IDA/CA) were detected in 55 (34.4%), 21 (13.1%), and 26 (16.3%) cases, respectively (Fig. 3B). Other abnormal ciliary ultrastructure include CA defects (n = 10), MTD with outer and inner dynein arm defects (n = 8), no cilia (n = 8), MTD (n = 7), oligocilia (n = 6) and IDA defects (n = 3). 16 patients (10.0%) present nearly normal cilia.

As for ciliary beat patterns detected by HSVA (n = 48), immotile, minimal movement, stiff, restricted, circular and normal cilia were reported in 20 (41.7%), 9 (18.8%), 8 (16.7%), 7 (14.6%), 2 (4.2%) and 2 (4.2%) cases, respectively. (Fig. 3C).

Associations between genotype, clinical characteristics and ciliary ultrastructure

The clinical and ciliary ultrastructural data of patients with PCD caused by different genes were showed in Table 2. To summarize, patients with DNAH5 mutation mainly presented ODA defects (75%) by TEM and immotile cilia by HSVA, and patients with DNAH11 mutation had nearly normal ultrastructure (64.3%) by TEM and restricted cilia by HSVA Meanwhile, patients with CCDC39 and CCNO mutation had worse lung function compared with patients who had DNAH5 mutation. By TEM analysis, patients with CCDC39 and CCDC40 mutation had MTD/IDA/CA defects.

Table 2 Clinical data, ciliary ultrastructural defects, and genetic mutations in Chinese patients with PCD

Discussion

Our study, for the first time, systematically summarized the clinical manifestations, genotype and ciliary ultrastructure of Chinese PCD patients based on current literatures. We show that there is a significantly delayed diagnosis of PCD possibly due to low awareness and limited diagnostic techniques, contributing to progressive lung disease and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Overall, mutation spectrums of Chinese PCD patients were similar with those in western countries except higher detection rate of HYDIN mutation. The correlations between genotype, clinical phenotype and ciliary ultrastructure were also evidenced based on small sample size.

Clinical features of Chinese PCD patients are similar to those in Caucasian patients including chronic wet cough, sinusitis, chronic middle ear disease with or without hearing loss, situs anomalies and history of NRDS  (Fig. 4) [66]. It seems that lower prevalence of middle ear disease was reported in Chinese PCD patients compared with that in western countries (27.5% vs. 72.7%). The possible explanations include the lack of multidisciplinary team for management of PCD in China and insidious middle ear disease being overshadowed by their upper or lower airway symptoms.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of clinical manifestations between Chinese and Caucasian patients with PCD. NRD = neonatal respiratory distress; CHD = congenital heart disease

The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 13.1 years old, suggesting a significantly delayed diagnosis of PCD in China [67]. The reasons for a diagnostic delay were speculated to be multifactorial, but at least including the following aspects: (1) the misconception that a diagnosis of PCD makes little difference to the management of patients with bronchiectasis; (2) the low awareness of PCD among physicians, especially for patients without situs anomalies; (3) the lack of access to specific diagnostic facilities and expertise in vast majority of healthcare settings; (4) the expensive costs of current diagnostic tests. In addition, although the identification of PCD was advocated in adult bronchiectasis guidelines when patients have clinical features compatible with this disease [68], only 37 cases were reported at adult pulmonary department to date, indicating huge under-recognition of PCD in adults in view of higher prevalence of bronchiectasis and huge population in China. These under-recognition and delayed diagnosis of PCD are inevitably associated with adverse health outcomes, such as an impairment of lung function, and increased likelihood of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and presence of bronchiectasis on chest image, which is evidenced in our study.

Extensive genetic heterogeneity in PCD was noticed in recent years with over 40 causative genes being identified. Mutations in 5 genes (DNAH5, DNAH11, DNAI1, CCDC39 and CCDC40) are the most common type of mutations in western countries although the vast majority of variants are private mutations [2]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies except that HYDIN other than DNAI1 is more common in Chinese patients. Mutations in HYDIN are known to cause CA defects, in which patients had very subtle ciliary beating abnormalities, nearly normal ciliary ultrastructure and situs solitus, making patients with CA defects difficult to diagnose. Owing to a recent evolutionary event, HYDIN became duplicated and therefore most of the coding exons of HYDIN are also present in the pseudogene HYDIN2 [69, 70]. Because of this duplicated DNA sequence, genetic analysis of HYDIN mutations is complicated, some commercial genetic kits available in the US or Europe do not screen for HYDIN mutations or have limited test sensitivity, highlighting potential cases at risk of being missed by standard functional tests in PCD patients carrying this genetic mutation [7]. These inherent factors, in combination with potential selected bias based on the small number of cases in our systematic review, may help to explain the differences. Noticeably, DNAH14 as a PCD-related gene was first reported in Chinese patients, which broadened the genetic spectrums of PCD [36].

To date, associations between genotype, phenotype and ciliary ultrastructure have been emerged. Gene mutations that encode ciliary proteins would result in functional defects in ODA, ODA docking, preassembly factors, axonemal ruler, nexin link dynein regulator complex proteins (N-DRCs), RS components and CA associated proteins [7, 71]. Our results are consistent with this principle. In addition, lung function in patients with PCD are significantly heterogenous, ranging from normal to very severe impairment [72, 73]. Previous studies have showed that patients with CCNO mutations would experience a rapid deterioration of lung function [74], and patients with CCDC39 or CCDC40 mutations had worse lung function and MTD/IDA/CA defects by TEM analysis [8]. Our results supported these findings except of nearly normal lung function in patients with CCDC40 mutations. However, only 3 children had a CCDC40 mutation, which might bias the result due to limited cases. Further large-scale cohort studies are essential to better elucidate the genotype–phenotype relationships.

Only 41.8% participants have been undergone the nasal NO test in China. As a noninvasive, affordable and relatively easy test, nasal NO should be strongly advocated in the etiological evaluation of bronchiectasis when indicated. In addition, the accessibility and costs of genetic tests have been largely improved with the rapid advance in next-generation sequencing in recent years. We supposed that the nasal NO screening plus genetic tests will be a feasible strategy for detecting PCD in patients with clinical manifestations suggesting this disease, considering the HSVA and TEM facilities are not available in vast majority of healthcare settings in China. We believe that accurate and prompt identification of PCD in patients who have clinical features compatible with this disease, will tailor treatment appropriately and allow counselling for this multisystem inherited disease.

Our systematic review has several strengths and limitations. We, for the first time, summarized the cases of PCD in Chinese populations based on available literatures, and compared the clinical characteristics of Chinese patients stratified by age at diagnosis, and further compared these features with Caucasian PCD patients, and highlighted the significant heterogeneity of clinical manifestations and genetic spectrum in Chinese patients, and demonstrated the adverse effect of a delayed diagnosis of PCD. However, all included studies were case reports and/or case series, in which we did not evaluate the study quality due to a lack of accepted assessment tool and could not exclude recall or ascertainment or selection bias. In addition, some findings of our study should be interpreted with caution because of a very small sample size and the lack of standardized data collection of included studies although our systematic review represents the most comprehensive descriptions of PCD in China to date. Another issue was the limited clinical data, such missing or unreliable information due to retrospective data collection and the lack of longitudinal information in our systematic review, that could be used to explore phenotype-genotype associations. It would therefore be essential for future studies to include longitudinal data to understand time-varying associations between phenotypes and genotypes in large collaborative clinical and research networks with standardized data collection in China in light of high variations of disease progression in PCD.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of PCD in China was often delayed, which contributed to adverse health effects. Consistent with Caucasian patients, a significant heterogeneity of clinical and genetic characteristics was also found in Chinese patients. Our study highlights the importance of raising awareness among physicians and establishing the specialized referral centers to prompt early diagnosis and treatment of PCD. Fortunately, the national registration of rare diseases, including PCD, have been launched in China, which will undoubtedly bring the infinite hopes to Chinese PCD patients in the foreseeable future.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCD:

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

PA:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

NRDS:

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

ERS:

European Respiratory Society

ATS:

American Thoracic Society

nNO:

Nasal nitric oxide

HSVA:

High-speed video analysis

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

IDA:

Inner dynein arm

ODA:

Outer dynein arm

MTD:

Microtubular disorganization

N-DRCs:

Nexin link dynein regulator complex proteins

CA:

Central apparatus

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in one second

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

SIT:

Situs inversus totalis

HTX:

Heterotaxy

SS:

Situs solitus

Homo:

Homozygous

Comp het:

Compound heterozygous

ENT:

Ear-nose-throat department

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

OMIM:

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

References

  1. Horani A, Ferkol TW. Advances in the genetics of primary ciliary dyskinesia: clinical implications. Chest. 2018;154(3):645–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knowles MR, Zariwala M, Leigh M. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37(3):449–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knowles MR, Daniels LA, Davis SD, Zariwala MA, Leigh MW. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Recent advances in diagnostics, genetics, and characterization of clinical disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):913–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shoemark A, Dell S, Shapiro A, Lucas JS. ERS and ATS diagnostic guidelines for primary ciliary dyskinesia: similarities and differences in approach to diagnosis. Eur Respir J. 2019;54(3):1901066.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lucas JS, Barbato A, Collins SA, et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J. 2017; 49(1):1601090. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01090-2016.

  6. Shapiro AJ, Davis SD, Polineni D, et al. Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. An official American thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(12):e24–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas JS, Davis SD, Omran H, Shoemark A. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in the genomics age. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(2):202–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis SD, Rosenfeld M, Lee H-S, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: longitudinal study of lung disease by ultrastructure defect and genotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(2):190–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Knowles MR, Ostrowski LE, Leigh MW, et al. Mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with a unique clinical and ciliary phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(6):707–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Callaghan C, Chetcuti P, Moya E. High prevalence of primary ciliary dyskinesia in a British Asian population. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(1):51–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin JL, Xu JF, Qu JM. Bronchiectasis in China. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(5):609-616.12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Z, Chen W, Wang L, Qian L. Clinical and genetic spectrum of children with primary ciliary dyskinesia in China. J Pediatr. 2020;225:157-165.e5.2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guan Y, Yang H, Yao X, et al. Clinical and genetic spectrum of children with primary ciliary dyskinesia in China. Chest. 2021;159:1768–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fassad MR, Patel MP, Shoemark A, et al. Clinical utility of NGS diagnosis and disease stratification in a multiethnic primary ciliary dyskinesia cohort. J Med Genet. 2020;57(5):322–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Afzelius BA. Genetical and ultrastructural aspects of the immotile-cilia syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1981;33(6):852–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin T-K. A successful pregnancy with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in an infertile woman with Kartagener’s syndrome: a case report. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(10):625–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsang KW, Ip M, Ooi CG, et al. Kartagener’s syndrome: a re-visit with Chinese perspectives. Respirology (Carlton, Vic). 1998;3(2):107–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bi J, Bai C, Qiao R. A 27-year-old Chinese man with recurrent respiratory infections. Chest. 2010;137(4):990–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang X, Zou J, Liu S. Endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment of Kartagener syndrome: a case report. Balkan Med J. 2013;30(2):244–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen W, Shao C, Song Y, Bai C. Primary ciliary dyskinesia complicated with diffuse panbronchiolitis: a case report and literature review. Clin Respir J. 2014;8(4):425–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Guan L, Wen W, et al. A novel mutation of DNAH5 in chronic rhinosinusitis and primary ciliary dyskinesia in a Chinese family. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(6):1589–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao Y, Shao C, Song Y, Bai C, He L. Clinical analysis of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia in mainland China. Clin Respir J. 2016;10(6):765–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sui W, Hou X, Che W, et al. CCDC40 mutation as a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia: a case report and review of literature. Clin Respir J. 2016;10(5):614–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo T, Tan Z-P, Chen H-M, et al. An effective combination of whole-exome sequencing and runs of homozygosity for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in consanguineous families. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7905.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hou J, Zhang Y, Gong R, Zheng X, Yang X. Primary ciliary dyskinesia presenting with spontaneous pneumothorax: case report and review of the literature. Respir Med Case Rep. 2017;21:167–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, Gong P, Wen J. Clinical and genetic analysis of a family with Kartagener syndrome caused by novel DNAH5 mutations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(2):275–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu L, Luo H. Whole-exome sequencing identified a novel compound heterozygous mutation of LRRC6 in a Chinese primary ciliary dyskinesia patient. Biomed Res Int. 2018:1854269. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1854269.

  28. Yang L, Banerjee S, Cao J, et al. compound heterozygous variants in the coiled-coil domain containing 40 gene in a Chinese family with primary ciliary dyskinesia cause extreme phenotypic diversity in cilia ultrastructure. Front Genet. 2018;9:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li P, He Y, Cai G, et al. CCDC114 is mutated in patient with a complex phenotype combining primary ciliary dyskinesia, sensorineural deafness, and renal disease. J Hum Genet. 2019;64(1):39–48.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yue Y, Huang Q, Zhu P, et al. Identification of pathogenic mutations and investigation of the notch pathway activation in Kartagener syndrome. Front Genet. 2019;10:749.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang W, Li D, Wei S, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies a novel CCDC151 mutation, c.325G>T (p.E109X), in a patient with primary ciliary dyskinesia and situs inversus. J Hum Genet. 2019;64(3):249–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng S, Wu S, Xia H, et al. Identification of a frame shift mutation in the CCDC151 gene in a Han-Chinese family with Kartagener syndrome. 2020. Biosci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20192510.

  33. Wang Y, Tu C, Nie H, et al. Novel DNAAF6 variants identified by whole-exome sequencing cause male infertility and primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(4):811–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun M, Zhang Y, Yang J, et al. Novel compound heterozygous DNAAF2 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia in a Han Chinese family. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:2159–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang C, Liu NC, Wang XB, et al. Novel deletion mutations of the PIH1D3 gene in an infertile young man with primary ciliary dyskinesia and his cousin with Kartagener’s syndrome. Asian J Androl. 2021;23:330–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou L, Li Z, Du C, et al. Novel dynein axonemal assembly factor 1 mutations identified using whole-exome sequencing in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(6):4707–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Y, Jiang C, Zhang X, et al. The effect of a novel LRRC6 mutation on the flagellar ultrastructure in a primary ciliary dyskinesia patient. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:689–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Zhou XJ, Zhang TH. Electron microscopic observation of a case with primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Chin Electr Microsc Soc. 1995;01:36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou B, Guan YP, Liu SH, et al. Observation of nasal mucosal cilia ultrastructure of Kartagener’s syndrome. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;36(5):323–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Peng DH, Liu EM, Huang Y, et al. A case report of primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Third Mil Med Univ. 2005;27(9):877–80.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qin T. Immotile cilia syndrome: two cases report. Clin Focus. 2006;21(5):364–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wei YX, Xing FH, Miao XT, et al. Clinical features of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;42(3):195–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu BP, Shen KL, Hu YH, et al. Clinical characteristics of primary ciliary dyskinesia in children. Chin J Pediatr. 2008;46(8):618–22.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jin BB, Tian XL, Zheng SY, et al. Clinical analysis of four cases of primary ciliary dyskinesia and literature review. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2010;33(3):197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dong YQ, Du J, Xi XL. Misdiagnosis analysis of a case with immotile cilia syndrome. J Guizhou Med Univ. 2011;4:439–40.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang T, Zhang J, Dong SW, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a case report and literature review. Chin J Asthma (Electronic Edition). 2011;05(1):63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu SH, Yang XD, Wang YT. Kartagener syndrome: three cases report and literature review. Chin J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;11(3):267–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Qu MY, Feng WJ, Yang XY. Diagnosis and treatment of immotile cilia syndrome: report of two cases and literatures review. J Clin Res. 2013;30(3):589–91.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bai Y, Zhang J, You SH, et al. Clinical characteristics of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;49(2):115–20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nie HP, Peng YQ, Yang HZ. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in an adult: case report and literature review. All Health. 2014;9:304–5.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jin YT, Chen X, Wang JR, et al. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of Kartagener syndrome in Chinese and foreign children. Chin J Pediatr. 2015;53(11):850–4.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ren JY, Wang XR, He ZY, et al. Kartagener syndrome and papillary thyroid carcinoma: an unusual combination. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;29(21):1911–4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang YK, Gao WJ, An SH, et al. Kartagener syndrome: a case report. J Clin Pediatr. 2015;8:755–6.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Qiu X, Zhou XL, Ding W, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a case report. Chin J Lung Dis (Electronic Edition). 2016;9(5):572–4.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Qi YY, Hong D, Wang HJ, et al. Genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for primary ciliary dyskinesia in a case caused by CCDC39 gene mutations. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr. 2016;11(6):445–9.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen LL, Yang YG, Wu JZ, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia with HYDIN gene mutation in a child and literature review. Chin J Pediatr. 2017;55(4):304–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen TD, Xia PY, Chen RY, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in 2 children caused by HYDIN gene mutation. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. 2018;33(3):236–7.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang K, Chen X, Guo CY, et al. Cilia ultrastructural and gene variation of primary ciliary dyskinesia: report of three cases and literatures review. Chin J Pediatr. 2018;56(2):134–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Shen N, Meng C, Liu Y, et al. Genetic diagnosis of a case with primary ciliary dyskinesia type 29 by next generation sequencing. Chin J Med Genet. 2019;36(3):225–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang WM, Ma N, Ning J. Kartagener syndrome in a child: case report and literature review. J Clin Pulm Med. 2019;24(9):1738–41.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yang JJ, Xu XX, Wang ZD, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a case report. Chin J Lung Dis (Electronic Edition). 2019;12(4):531–3.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yang Q, Ma HL, Zheng YJ, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia caused by novel compound heterozygous mutation in HYDIN gene: a case report. J Clin Pediatr. 2019;37(4):268–72.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wang S, Li B, Chen YF, et al. Analysis of PIH1D3 variant in a Chinese pedigree affected with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Chin J Med Genet. 2020;37(09):1021–4.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Li Y, Fu WL, Tian DY, et al. Genetically confirmed two cases of primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal cilia structure. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr. 2020;15(05):394–6.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bin ST, Min JQ, Tan L, et al. Clinical features and misdiagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in 8 cases. Clin Misdiagn Misther3. 2020;33(10):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Goutaki M, Meier AB, Halbeisen FS, et al. Clinical manifestations in primary ciliary dyskinesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(4):1081–95.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kuehni CE, Frischer T, Strippoli MPF, et al. Factors influencing age at diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in European children. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(6):1248–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hill AT, Sullivan AL, Chalmers JD, et al. British thoracic society guideline for bronchiectasis in adults. Thorax. 2019;74(Suppl 1):1–69.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Olbrich H, Schmidts M, Werner C, et al. Recessive HYDIN mutations cause primary ciliary Dyskinesia without randomization of left-right body asymmetry. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(4):672–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shapiro AJ, Leigh MW. Value of transmission electron microscopy for primary ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis in the era of molecular medicine: genetic defects with normal and non-diagnostic ciliary ultrastructure. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2017;41(6):373–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Poprzeczko M, Bicka M, Farahat H, et al. Rare human diseases: model organisms in deciphering the molecular basis of primary ciliary Dyskinesia. Cells. 2019;8(12):1614.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Marthin JK, Petersen N, Skovgaard LT, Nielsen KG. Lung function in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia a cross-sectional and 3-decade longitudinal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(11):1262–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Maglione M, Bush A, Montella S, et al. Progression of lung disease in primary ciliary dyskinesia: is spirometry less accurate than CT? Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47(5):498–504.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Amirav I, Wallmeier J, Loges NT, et al. Systematic analysis of CCNO variants in a defined population: implications for clinical phenotype and differential diagnosis. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(4):396–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This study was supported by Shanghai Pujiang program 2021 (21PJD061 to YHG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BP, YHG, JFX and GJZ drafted the first version of this manuscript; BP, YHG, JQX, XWH, CCW, JFX, GJZ conceived and designed the overall study; BP, YHG, JQX, XWH, CCW, JFX and GJZ; YHG and GJZ are responsible for study oversight, management and coordination. All authors reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final version of the report.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-hua Gao or Guo-jun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not required.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Table S1. Excluded articles after full-text review. Table S2. Study characteristics of included studies. Table S3. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results of patients who have a clinical diagnosis of PCD in excluded studies after full-text review.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, B., Gao, Yh., Xie, Jq. et al. Clinical and genetic spectrum of primary ciliary dyskinesia in Chinese patients: a systematic review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 283 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02427-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02427-1

Keywords

  • PCD
  • Systematic review
  • Genotype
  • Phenotype
  • Cilia