Skip to main content

Phenotype expansion of variants affecting p38 MAPK signaling in hypospadias patients

Abstract

Background

Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly of the male urogenital system. Genetics factors play an important role in its pathogenesis. To search for potential causal genes/variants for hypospadias, we performed exome sequencing in a pedigree with three patients across two generations and a cohort of 49 sporadic patients with hypospadias.

Results

A novel BRAF variant (NM_004333.6: c.362C > A) was found to co-segregate with the hypospadias phenotype in the disease pedigree. In cells overexpressing the BRAF mutant, the phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK was significantly increased as compared with the cells overexpressing the wild-type BRAF or RASopathy-related BRAF mutant. This variant further led to a reduced transcription level of the SRY gene, which is essential for the normal development of the male reproductive system. In the cohort of sporadic patients, we identified two additional variants in p38 MAPK signaling-related genes (TRIM67 and DAB2IP) potentially associated with hypospadias.

Conclusion

Our study expands the phenotypic spectrum of variants affecting p38 MAPK signaling toward the involvement of hypospadias.

Background

Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly of the male urogenital system with an incidence of 20.9 per 10,000 births [1]. It can be isolated, accompanied by other genitourinary abnormalities, or co-exist with multisystemic anomalies [2,3,4]. Genetic variant is a major etiologic factor of hypospadias. [2, 3, 5]. The heritability of hypospadias varies from 57 to 77% among different studies, suggesting the key role of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of hypospadias [2, 6].

The development of male external genitalia undergoes two phases: a hormone-independent phase and a hormone-dependent phase, both under complex genetic regulation [3,4,5]. In the hormone-independent phase, key genes involved in WNT/β‐catenin signaling (WNT5A), Sonic Hedgehog signaling (SHH, GLI3), fibroblast growth factor signaling (FGF8, FGFR2), and bone morphogenetic protein signaling (BMP7) pathways participate in the outgrowth of genital tubercle and the canalization of urethral plate. Single nucleotide polymorphisms or pathogenic variants in these genes have been associated with hypospadias [4, 5, 7, 8]. In the hormone-dependent phase driven by the increased androgen level, the lateral folds of the urethral groove fuse to form the urethra [8]. Genes that participate in testicular determination (SRY, SOX9, WT1, NR5A1, MAP3K1, etc.), androgen synthesis and metabolism (SRD5A2, CYP11A1, POR, STAR, MAMLD1, etc.), or androgen signaling (AR, DGKK, etc.) are key regulators of this process. Pathogenic variants in these genes can cause deficit androgen production or perturbation of androgen signaling, thereby causing hypospadias or complete feminization of the external genitalia [4, 5, 9, 10].

Although numerous causal genes related with hypospadias have been reported, the etiology remains unidentified in over 70% of hypospadias patients [5, 11]. To search for potential causal genes/variants for hypospadias, we performed exome sequencing in a Chinese pedigree with three hypospadias patients and identified a novel variant in the BRAF gene. The subsequent functional analysis revealed that this variant could lead to an increased p38 MAPK activation. To elucidate the contributions of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway to hypospadias, we further studied mutations in other genes involved in the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in a sporadic cohort of 49 hypospadias patients.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

We recruited a pedigree with three cases affected by proximal hypospadias (Fig. 1A, B) and a sporadic cohort with individuals affected by isolated hypospadias of various severity, ranging from penoscrotal to glandular hypospadias. None of the patients reported exposure to exogenous progesterone or potential teratogenic drugs during pregnancy. Testicular size and function are within the normal range among the patients (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Pedigree of the hypospadias patients. * indicates members who were exome-sequenced. M: the mutated allele BRAF c. 362C > A; WT: wildtype BRAF allele; B Clinical evaluation of the patients. Up: the proband has penoscrotal hypospadias. Down: III-2 has mild constricted ear (notice the folded helical rim); C Conservation of the variant loci; D Sanger sequencing confirmed the variant. Left: heterozygous mutated allele; Right: wildtype allele

Table 1 Demographic and clinical information of the patients

A novel BRAF variant co-segregating with hypospadias in the pedigree

We first performed a co-segregation analysis in the three-generation pedigree. Exome sequencing of the pedigree yielded a total of 2651 variants that passed the quality control (QC). We excluded the variants that are present in public databases, leaving 556 single-nucleotide variations and 34 insertion/deletion variants (Table 2). Among these variants, four variants were found to co-segregate with the disease, including BRAF c.362C > A, FRAS1 c.7004 T > G, ELF4 c.1185G > A, and MESP2 c.829G > A (Table 3).

Table 2 Variant prioritization process
Table 3 Detailed information of the candidate variants

To screen for potential pathogenic variants that were not covered by exome sequencing, we also performed whole genome sequencing on the proband. No reported pathogenic variants or cryptic splicing variants were identified. We also analyzed the regulatory elements of the candidate genes (i.e., BRAF, FRAS1, ELF4, and MESP2) from the pedigree analysis and did not find any potential deleterious variants.

Of the four co-segregating variants, the BRAF variant (NM_004333.6: c.362C > A) is predicted to be highly deleterious by Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD > 20) and highly conserved across various species (Fig. 1C). In addition, BRAF has a high probability of loss-of-function intolerance score (pLI = 1.0). Therefore, we prioritized the BRAF variant under the hypothesis of a dominant inheritance mode. The variant was confirmd by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1D).

The BRAF gene encodes B-Raf protein, a serine/threonine protein kinase central to the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway. It is expressed in multiple organs, including the gonads and urinary tract. To date, only one variant in BRAF (c.16_40del) has been implicated in a sporadic case of midshaft hypospadias. But the gene-disease association was uncertain [12]. BRAF is an established causal gene for several autosomal dominant RASopathies, including Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (MIM 115150), Noonan syndrome (MIM 613706), and LEOPARD syndrome (MIM 613707). Common manifestations of BRAF-related syndromes include growth retardation, intellectual/motor developmental delay, congenital heart defects, craniofacial deformities, abnormal pigmentation of the skin, spare/curly hair, and cryptorchidism [13,14,15]. In the follow-up examination, we only observed trivial overlap between BRAF-related phenotypes and the clinical manifestation of the two patients (Table 1). The proband’s affected brother (III-2) has a mild constricted ear and a café-au-lait-like patch on the back. The proband’s affected uncle (II-4) has a low birth weight (1.75 kg) and curly hair. Therefore, we hypothesized that the BRAF variant might lead to hypospadias via a non-canonical mechanism. Therefore, we performed the subsequent functional assays to evaluate whether the variant altered MAPK signaling cascades and downstream gene expression.

The BRAF c.362C > A variant results in p38 MAPK hyperphosphorylation

We performed Western Blot on the lysate of cells overexpressing the wildtype BRAF or BRAF mutants. The mutants included the variant we identified (NM_004333.6:c.362C > A, p.Arg121Thr) and a positive control variant (NM_004333.6:c.735A > C, p.Leu245Phe) known to be associated with LEOPARD syndrome 3 [13]. The expression of BRAF protein was consistent between the wild-type and mutant cells (p-value = 0.61) (Fig. 2A, B). The proportion of phosphorylated ERK1/2 MAPK was increased in both mutants (p-value = 0.001 for c.362C > A; p-value = 0.013 for c.735A > C) but did not differ significantly between the two mutants (p-value = 0.946). Notably, the proportion of phosphorylated p38 MAPK increased significantly in the c.362C > A mutant (p-value = 0.0016) but not in the c.735A > C mutant (p-value = 0.963) (Fig. 2B), indicating that the c.362C > A variant had a distinct impact on p38 MAPK signaling.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A, B Western blot analysis of total and phosphorylated MAPKs in cultured HEK293 cells overexpressing the BRAF mutant allele. Vector: transfected with the empty vector; WT: transfected with wildtype BRAF construct; c.362C > A: transfected with the novel BRAF variant (NM_004333.6: c.362C > A, p.Arg121Thr); 735A > C: transfected with the positive control variant (NM_004333.6:c.735A > C, p.Leu245Phe), a known pathogenic variant associated with LEOPARD syndrome 3. The proportion of phosphorylated p38 MAPK increased significantly in the c.362C > A group (44.80% vs 24.38%, p-value = 0.0016), while did not change significantly in the positive control group (24.24% vs 24.38%). The proportion of phosphorylated ERK MAPK increased significantly in both c.362C > A group (57.71% vs 32.85%, p-value = 0.001) and the positive control group (57.28% vs 32.85%, p-value = 0.013), but did not differ significantly between the two mutant groups(p-value = 0.963). C Quantitative PCR analysis of male-sex-differentiation-related genes. The expression of SRY (p-value = 0.002), SOX9(p-value = 0.0003), and FGF9 (p-value = 0.007) decreased by 50%, 42%, and 41% respectively in the c.362C > A (p.Arg121Thr) group. While in the positive control group, no reduction in expression of these gene was observed

Similarly, pathogenic MAP3K1 variants associated with 46, XY sex reversal (MIM 613762) could cause hyperphosphorylation of ERK (downstream effector of BRAF) and p38 MAPKs by increased binding to MAP3K4 and RHOA. This hyperphosphorylation may account for the decreased expression of testicular-determining genes, which leads to testicular agenesis and the subsequent feminization of the male genitalia [27]. Therefore, the effect of the BRAF c.362C > A variant on p38 MAPK may account for the phenotypic disparity between the RASopathy phenotypes and the phenotypes of our patients.

The BRAF c.362C > A variant is associated with a decreased SRY transcription

The hyperphosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPKs caused by pathogenic MAP3K1 variants was reported to decrease the expression of male-sex-differentiation-related genes [16]. Therefore, we examined the transcription level of SRY, SOX9, and FGF9 genes in NT-2 cells overexpressing the wild-type or the two BRAF mutants (c.362C > A and c.735A > C). Compared to the cells overexpressing wild-type BRAF, SRY expression decreased by 50% in the c.362C > A group (p-value = 0.002) and increased by 6% in the c.735A > C group with a borderline significance (p-value = 0.071). A significant decrease in SOX9 (42%, p-value = 0.0003) and FGF9 (41%, p-value = 0.007) expression was also observed in the c.362 C > A group (Fig. 2C), but not in the c.735 A > C mutant group. During male sex differentiation, the SRY gene is the initiator, and the SOX9 and FGF9 genes are both crucial drivers. Decreased expression of these genes may lead to insufficient or delayed androgen production, thereby causing hypospadias. Our finding suggests that the BRAF c.362C > A variant can lead to decreased expression of testicular determining genes, consistent with the reported pathogenesis of hypospadias [16].

Candidate variants in p38 MAPK-related genes in the sporadic hypospadias cohort

To search for more p38 MAPK-related genes that are potentially causal for hypospadias, we conducted pathway-based variant prioritization in the sporadic hypospadias cohort. Two variants in p38 MAPK-related genes, namely TRIM67 p.R416T (NM_001004342.3:c.1247G > C) and DAB2IP p.G694D (NM_138709.2:c.2081G > A) (Table 4) were prioritized. Both variants are of maternal origin and have CADD scores higher than 20. No diagnostic variant was found in patients carrying these two candidate variants.

Table 4 Detailed information of candidate variants involved in MAPK signaling pathway

TRIM67 encodes the Tripartite Motif Containing 67 protein. It is a mediator of MAPK11, which encodes one of the p38 MAPKs. A recent study reported that TRIM67 negatively regulates MAPK11 expression [17]. A deleterious variant in this gene might affect the p38 signaling cascade. Further analysis is required to validate how the TRIM67 p.R416T variant affects the p38 cascade.

DAB2IP is ubiquitously expressed and plays a diverse role in different MAPK signaling circuits. It negatively regulates RAS/MAPK signaling and thereby inhibits ERK1/2 phosphorylation; upregulates JUN and p38 MAPKs via activating ASK1 [18]. A deleterious variant in DAB2IP could potentially alter both the ERK1/2 cascade and the p38 cascade. The DAB2IP variant we prioritized is absent from public databases and has a CADD score of 26.1, suggesting its pathogenic potential. Nevertheless, its pathogenicity remains to be validated by functional assays.

Discussion

In this study, we performed exome sequencing in a Chinese pedigree with three hypospadias patients and a sporadic cohort including 49 hypospadias patients. A co-segregating novel variant in the BRAF gene (NM_004333.6: c.362C > A) was identified from the pedigree. In vitro functional analysis conducted in cell lines overexpressing the mutated BRAF demonstrated hyperphosphorylation of p38 MAPK and decreased expression of SRY, SOX9, and FGF9 genes. From the sporadic hypospadias cohort, we identified two rare deleterious variants in p38 MAPK-related genes, further highlighting the role of p38 MAPK-related genes in hypospadias.

In previous studies, pathogenic BRAF variants have been associated with a series of RASopathies. Phenotypes of BRAF-related RASopathies include intellectual instability, motor development delay, short stature, sparse/curly hair, pigmentation abnormality of skin, congenital heart defects, and craniofacial dysmorphism [13, 15]. Our patients, however, presented with only hypospadias but not the typical manifestations of BRAF-associated RASopathies. Variants causing BRAF-related RASopathies could increase the activation of ERK1/2 MAPK signaling [13]. In contrast, the variant we identified also increased the activation of p38 MAPK, while no significant change in p38 activation was observed for the RASopathy-related BRAF variant (Fig. 3). This distinct impact on p38 MAPK signaling might account for disparity between the phenotypes of our patients and BRAF-associated RASopathy phenotypes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A schematic diagram demonstrating how the BRAF variant leads to hypospadias. Green bars indicate activation. Red bars indicate inhibition. Dash lines indicate potential interaction

MAPK cascades are vital for male sex differentiation. Pathogenic MAP3K1 variants that cause 46, XY sex reversal had increased binding to RHOA, FRAT1, and MAP3K4 and upregulated ERK MAPK and p38 MAPK signaling [16, 19]. This increase in ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling upregulated the expression of FOXL2 and β-catenin, i.e., genes that drive female sex differentiation, while suppressed the expression of SRY, SOX9, and FGF9, i.e., genes that drive male sex differentiation [16]. Similarly, our findings also suggest that p38 overactivation caused by the BRAF variant could downregulate the expression of the SRY gene and thereby inhibit male sex differentiation.

Besides the BRAF variant, we also identified a co-segregating variant in FRAS1, a gene known to be associated with hypospadias. The known inheritance patterns of FRAS1-related disorders include recessive and compound heterozygous inheritance. Both exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing were performed on the proband, but neither yielded any additional candidate variant in FRAS1 or its regulatory elements. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the potential contribution of the FRAS1 variant to the disease pathogenesis via a multi-genic mechanism.

Another limitation of our study is the modest relevance of the two variants identified in the sporadic cohort. One the one hand, the sample size of the sporadic cohort is limited. On the other hand, no functional assessment was carried out to test the effect of the two variants on p38 MAPK signaling. Besides, although no diagnostic variant was identified, the contribution of other rare deleterious variants cannot be ruled out either. Future studies could validate the relevance of these variants in larger cohorts and test their molecular impact with functional assays.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified and validated a novel BRAF variant (NM_004333.6: c.362C > A, p.Thr121Lys) causal for hypospadias. Besides, we identified two candidate variants involved in p38 MAPK signaling that may be associated with hypospadias. Our study expands the phenotypic spectrum of variants involved in p38 MAPK signaling toward the involvement of hypospadias.

Materials and methods

Participants and clinical evaluation

In this study, patients affected by isolated hypospadias with potential genetic predispositions were included and subjected to exome sequencing. From October 2016 to November 2020, children admitted to the Department of Urology of Beijing Children's Hospital for surgical repair of hypospadias were evaluated to determine eligibility. All the patients underwent routine examinations to rule out 46, XY Disorders of Sexual Development. Gestational exposure to potential teratogens (diethylstilbestrol, pesticides, herbal medicine) and gestational complications (assisted reproductive technology, infection in the first trimester, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, etc.) were investigated to exclude hypospadias caused by environmental or maternal factors [3, 6]. We preliminarily analyzed the exome sequencing data of the patients and excluded those carrying known pathogenic variants. In total, we enrolled a pedigree with three hypospadias patients in two generations (Fig. 1A) and a sporadic cohort including 49 hypospadias patients. For the sporadic cohort, we also enrolled the parents of 29 patients and the healthy brothers of the other 20 patients to facilitate the subsequent genetic analysis.

To compare the phenotypes of our patients with BRAF-related syndromes (Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome MIM: 115150, LEOPARD syndrome 3 MIM: 613707, Noonan syndrome 7 MIM: 613706) [13, 15], a follow-up systemic evaluation was performed on each patient in the pedigree. We inspected the patients for cutaneous abnormalities (such as multiple lentigines, hyperpigmentation, spare hair, curly hair, ichthyosis, and eyebrow hypoplasia) and craniofacial deformities (such as short-neck, auricular deformity, macrocephaly/microcephaly, hypertelorism, epicanthus, and depressed nasal bridge). Echocardiogram and urinary tract ultrasound were performed to identify potential heart defects and urogenital anomalies.

Exome sequencing

We collected blood samples from the participants and extracted DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes with standard methods. For the disease pedigree, we performed exome sequencing on the patients and the available family members, seven subjects in total (Fig. 1A). For the sporadic cohort, we sequenced 49 hypospadias patients. For 29 of them, exome sequencing was also performed in their parents. For the remaining 20 patients, their healthy brothers were sequenced. DNA samples were prepared in Illumina libraries and then underwent whole-exome capture with the SureSelectXT Human All Exon V6. The subsequent sequencing was performed on the NovaSeq S4 PE150 platform.

Variant calling and preliminary filtration

All variants were called and annotated using an in-house developed Peking Union Medical College Hospital Pipeline (PUMP) [20,21,22]. Human reference genome hg19 was used for all analyses. We retained variants that pass the quality control threshold (genotype quality > 20, read depth > 10, variant allele frequency > 30). The populational frequency of each quality-control-passed variant was obtained from the public population databases, including the 1000 genome project, the Exome Sequencing Project [23], the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) [24], and the in-house database of DISCO (Deciphering disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities, http://discostudy.org/, ≈ 8000 exomes/genomes) study. Rare variants (minor allele frequency < 0.001) were retained for further filtering. From these rare variants, we included the protein-altering or splice-region variants for subsequent analysis.

Pedigree data analysis

For the pedigree data analysis, we assumed a sex-limited autosomal/X-linked dominant mode of inheritance. Therefore, we included the variants that are present in the patients (III-1, III-2, and II-4) and the proband’s mother but absent in the proband’s father (II-1) (see Fig. 1A). For the remaining variants, we selected the variants with CADD scores (v1.2) above 20.

Whole genome sequencing

We performed whole genome sequencing on the proband of the hypospadias pedigree to screen for potential pathogenic variants that were not covered by exome sequencing, including cryptic splice sites, copy number variants (CNVs), and structural variants (SVs). The peripheral DNA was extracted following standard protocols. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the KAPA Hyper Prep kit (KAPA Biosystems, Kusatsu, Japan) with an optimized manufacturer’s protocol. We performed multiplex sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq X-Ten sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Variants were called and annotated using the PUMP [20,21,22]. We excluded the variants that did not pass our quality-control filters (genotype quality > 20, read depth > 10, variant allele frequency > 30). We first looked for known pathogenic variants reported in the ClinVar database(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/, version 2022-01-27) or the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) [25, 26]. We predicted the impact of intronic variants on splicing using the SpliceAI software [27]. Regulatory element annotation for each variant was retrieved from the Regulatory Elements Database [28]. CNVs were called using the CNVnator v0.4.1 software using the default parameters [29]. SVs were called using the LUMPY v0.3.1 software following standard procedures [30]. CNVs and SVs were annotated using the AnnotSV 3.0 webserver [30, 31]. We looked for CNVs/SVs that overlap with known pathogenic variants in the DECIPHER database v11.9 [32]. We also looked for CNVs/SVs that overlap with the four candidate genes (BRAF, FRAS1, MESP2, and ELF4) or their regulatory elements.

Cohort data analysis

To further explore the role of MAPK signaling in hypospadias, we searched for variants in MAPK signaling-related genes. Genes involved in MAP kinase activity (GO: 0004707), MAPK cascade (GO: 0000165), regulation of MAPK cascade (GO: 0043408), and regulation of p38 MAPK cascade (GO:1900744) were selected for further analysis. For the patients whose parents were sequenced, we excluded paternally inherited variants. For patients whose healthy brothers were sequenced, we excluded variants that are present in the healthy siblings. For patients who carried candidate variants in the above pathways, we reviewed their individual exome data for other potentially causal variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guideline for germline variant classification [33].

Variant confirmation

The BRAF variant we identified is in a low-complexity region, which might be prone to sequencing errors. Therefore, we performed Sanger sequencing to confirm the variant. Primers used in Sanger sequencing were designed and validated using standard methods. The primers we used are as follows: forward primer: 5’-CAGGACAAAGTCCGGATTGA-3’; reverse primer: 5’-GGATGCCTCTATTTGCATGACC-3’.

Plasmid construct and cell line construct

To analyze the functional consequences of the candidate BRAF variant, we constructed a pCMV4-FLAG-BRAF plasmid using a pEGFP-BRAF plasmid and a pCMV4-FLAG vector (purchased from Suzhou Bio-research Innovation Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences). A FLAG-tag was added to the N-terminus of BRAF protein to facilitate detection. A BRAF variant (NM_004333.6:c.735A > C, p.Leu245Phe) known to cause LEOPARD syndrome 3 was used as a positive control [13]. The candidate variant (NM_004333.6:c.362C > A, p. Thr121Lys) and the positive control variant were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis (KOD-Plus-Mutagenesis Kit, TOYOBO, Shanghai, China) into the pCMV4-FLAG-BRAF plasmids.

HEK 293 T cells were cultured using DMEM medium supplied with 10% fetal bovine serum following standard protocol. NT-2 cells were cultured using DMEM high glucose supplied with 10% fetal bovine serum and streptomycin (104 μg/mL) in a 37℃ container at 5% CO2. We used 0.25% trypsin to detach the cells when they reach 90% confluency and split 1:3 with fresh growth media. Both cell lines were transfected with either the null vector, the wild-type BRAF construct, or one of the BRAF mutant constructs following the lipofectamine 3000 protocol.

Western blot

HEK293 cells overexpressing the mutant or the wild-type BRAF were used to evaluate the effects on the MAPK signaling cascade exerted by the variants. 24 h after transfection, cells were switched to serum-deprived medium for 12 h and lysed in a standard lysis buffer supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor. Cell lysates were run on 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, blocked with bovine serum albumin, and examined for the basal phosphorylation levels of ERK and p38 MAPKs using the following antibodies: p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) rabbit antibody, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (T202/Y204) rabbit antibody, p38 MAPK (D13E1) XP® Rabbit mAb, and Phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (D3F9) XP® Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology). The expression level of BRAF protein was examined using a rabbit anti-FLAG polyclonal antibody (Applygen, Beijing). GAPDH was loaded as the internal control.

Quantitative PCR

The NTERA-2 (NT-2) cell line is a human embryonic carcinoma cell line derived from testicular teratoma. NT-2 expresses testicular-determining genes, thus an appropriate in vitro tool for studying male sex differentiation and development [34]. We used NT-2 cells overexpressing the mutated/wild-type BRAF to evaluate the effect of the BRAF variant on the expression of male-differentiation-related genes. 24 h after transfection, cells were lysed and total RNA was isolated. Quantitative PCR experiments were performed using the TaqMan gene expression master mix. β-actin was amplified as an internal control. The primers used for the assay were obtained from the PrimerBank database (https://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/) and validated using the UCSC in-silico PCR tool (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgPcr).

The western blot and Quantitative PCR assays were repeated for three times. Difference between groups were compared using the Student’s t test.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Yu X, Nassar N, Mastroiacovo P, Canfield M, Groisman B, Bermejo-Sánchez E, et al. Hypospadias prevalence and trends in international birth defect surveillance systems, 1980–2010. Eur Urol. 2019;76(4):482–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouty A, Ayers KL, Pask A, Heloury Y, Sinclair AH. The genetic and environmental factors underlying hypospadias. Sexual Dev. 2015;9(5):239–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL. Hypospadias, all there is to know. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(4):435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalfa N, Gaspari L, Ollivier M, Philibert P, Bergougnoux A, Paris F, et al. Molecular genetics of hypospadias and cryptorchidism recent developments. Clin Genet. 2019;95(1):122–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joodi M, Amerizadeh F, Hassanian SM, Erfani M, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA, et al. The genetic factors contributing to hypospadias and their clinical utility in its diagnosis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):5519–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorup J, Nordenskjöld A, Hutson JM. Genetic and environmental origins of hypospadias. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(3):227–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gredler ML, Patterson SE, Seifert AW, Cohn MJ. Foxa1 and Foxa2 orchestrate development of the urethral tube and division of the embryonic cloaca through an autoregulatory loop with Shh. Dev Biol. 2020;465(1):23–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunha GR, Liu G, Sinclair A, Cao M, Glickman S, Cooke PS, et al. Androgen-independent events in penile development in humans and animals. Differentiation. 2020;111:98–114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Z, Lin X, Wang Y, Xie H, Chen F. Dysregulated expression of androgen metabolism genes and genetic analysis in hypospadias. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8(8): e1346.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng Z, Armfield BA, Cohn MJ. Timing of androgen receptor disruption and estrogen exposure underlies a spectrum of congenital penile anomalies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(52):E7194–203.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang W, Shi J, Zhang C, Jiang X, Wang J, Wang W, et al. Identification of gene variants in 130 Han Chinese patients with hypospadias by targeted next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(8): e827.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ea V, Bergougnoux A, Philibert P, Servant-Fauconnet N, Faure A, Breaud J, et al. How far should we explore hypospadias? Next-generation sequencing applied to a large cohort of hypospadiac patients. Eur Urol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarkozy A, Carta C, Moretti S, Zampino G, Digilio MC, Pantaleoni F, et al. Germline BRAF mutations in Noonan, LEOPARD, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndromes: molecular diversity and associated phenotypic spectrum. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(4):695–702.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tajan M, Paccoud R, Branka S, Edouard T, Yart A. The RASopathy family: consequences of germline activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway. Endocr Rev. 2018;39(5):676–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee Y, Choi Y, Seo GH, Kim G-H, Choi IH, Keum C, et al. Clinical and molecular spectra of BRAF-associated RASopathy. J Hum Genet. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-00852-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Loke J, Pearlman A, Radi O, Zuffardi O, Giussani U, Pallotta R, et al. Mutations in MAP3K1 tilt the balance from SOX9/FGF9 to WNT/β-catenin signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(4):1073–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Wang G, Jiang X, Li W, Zhai C, Shang F, et al. TRIM67 inhibits tumor proliferation and metastasis by mediating MAPK11 in Colorectal Cancer. J Cancer. 2020;11(20):6025–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellazzo A, Di Minin G, Collavin L. Block one, unleash a hundred. Mechanisms of DAB2IP inactivation in cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(1):15–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearlman A, Loke J, Le Caignec C, White S, Chin L, Friedman A, et al. Mutations in MAP3K1 cause 46, XY disorders of sex development and implicate a common signal transduction pathway in human testis determination. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87(6):898–904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang K, Zhao S, Liu B, Zhang Q, Li Y, Liu J, et al. Perturbations of BMP/TGF-β and VEGF/VEGFR signalling pathways in non-syndromic sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVM). J Med Genet. 2018;55(10):675–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen N, Zhao S, Jolly A, Wang L, Pan H, Yuan J, et al. Perturbations of genes essential for Müllerian duct and Wölffian duct development in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(2):337–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao S, Zhang Y, Chen W, Li W, Wang S, Wang L, et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). J Med Genet. 2021;58(1):41–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fu W, O’Connor TD, Jun G, Kang HM, Abecasis G, Leal SM, et al. Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature. 2013;493(7431):216–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1062–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stenson PD, Ball EV, Mort M, Phillips AD, Shiel JA, Thomas NS, et al. Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD): 2003 update. Hum Mutat. 2003;21(6):577–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaganathan K, Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou S, McRae JF, Darbandi SF, Knowles D, Li YI, et al. Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning. Cell. 2019;176(3):535-48.e24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sheffield NC, Thurman RE, Song L, Safi A, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Lenhard B, et al. Patterns of regulatory activity across diverse human cell types predict tissue identity, transcription factor binding, and long-range interactions. Genome Res. 2013;23(5):777–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abyzov A, Urban AE, Snyder M, Gerstein M. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 2011;21(6):974–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Layer RM, Chiang C, Quinlan AR, Hall IM. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 2014;15(6):R84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geoffroy V, Guignard T, Kress A, Gaillard J-B, Solli-Nowlan T, Schalk A, et al. AnnotSV and knotAnnotSV: a web server for human structural variations annotations, ranking and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W21–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP, Clayton S, Corpas M, Rajan D, et al. DECIPHER: database of chromosomal imbalance and phenotype in humans using ensembl resources. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(4):524–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Knower KC, Sim H, McClive PJ, Bowles J, Koopman P, Sinclair AH, et al. Characterisation of urogenital ridge gene expression in the human embryonal carcinoma cell line NT2/D1. Sex Dev. 2007;1(2):114–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and their families involved in the study. We thank Beijing Ekitech Co. Ltd. for support in data management and bioinformatic analyses.

Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) study group

Guixing Qiu, Zhihong Wu, Terry Jianguo Zhang, Nan Wu, Shengru Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Sen Liu, Yuzhi Zuo, Gang Liu, Chenxi Yu, Lian Liu, Jiashen Shao, Sen Zhao, Zihui Yan, Hengqiang Zhao, Yuchen Niu, Xiaoxin Li, Huizi Wang, Congcong Ma, Zefu Chen, Bowen Liu, Xi Cheng, Jiachen Lin, Huakang Du, Yaqi Li, Shuang Song, Weijie Tian, Zhixin Xie, Zhengye Zhao, Lina Zhao, Zhi Zhao, Zhifa Zheng, Yingzhao Huang.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC 1000807, 2016YFC 1000801 to N.S.), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JQ20032 to N.W., 7191007 to Z.W.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81822030 and 82072391 to N.W., 81930068 and 81772299 to Z.W.), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, 2021-I2M-1-051 to N.W., 2021-I2M-1-052 to Z.W.), Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2020-4-40114 to N.W.), the Special Research Project for Capital Health Development (2018-4-1077), Tsinghua University-Peking Union Medical College Hospital Initiative Scientific Research Program, and Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT320025 to N.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

DFL, HKD, SZ, and NW designed the study, performed the data analyses and functional study, and drafted and revised the manuscript. BWL revised the manuscript. HCS, GNW, WPZ, HYL, PL, CL, WWH, ZWL, YY, and SFC contributed to patient enrollment and sample collection. LNZ and XXL contributed to the functional study. NS and NW supervised and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ning Sun or Nan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Beijing Children’s Hospital (project approval number 2012-24).

Consent for publication

Consent for publishing patients’ photos was obtained from their parents.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, D., Du, H., Zhao, S. et al. Phenotype expansion of variants affecting p38 MAPK signaling in hypospadias patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02334-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02334-5

Keywords

  • Hypospadias
  • Pedigree
  • Proto-oncogene proteins B-raf (BRAF)
  • Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)
  • p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases
  • Sex-determining region Y protein (SRY)