- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Exploring intersectionality: an international yet individual issue
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 17, Article number: 71 (2022)
This article explores both reported and personal experiences of intersectionality within the healthcare system, which is often due to systemic inequalities as well as deep ingrained perceptions and opinions. With my perspective as both a medical student and rare disease patient battling generalised Myasthenia Gravis, I uncover and expose the aspects of intersectionality which are often brushed under the carpet. Moreover, I identify potential routes which we may collectively, as both clinicians and patients, embark upon to navigate our way out of this systemic snare. For those reading and engaging with this article, I endeavour to humanise the publicised figures surrounding rare disease and emphasise that within each figure there are patients, just like myself, who too may be experiencing the multifactorial issues arising from intersectionality. Furthermore, the coronavirus pandemic has highlighted and emphasised the pre-existing divide in the treatment of societal groups, for those both receiving and delivering care. We have long attempted to plaster over this chronic wound however the distressing outcomes of this pandemic have forced us to address this shameful truth from its core. Intersectionality is a disease which is destroying our healthcare system from within. However, unlike many rare diseases, intersectionality can be abolished.
It is one matter to explain intersectionality, and another altogether to experience it. In 2015, the Oxford English Dictionary defined intersectionality as “The interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage” . As powerful and impactful as this literal definition may be, it pales into insignificance when compared with the breath-taking blow felt when enduring intersectionality. As a patient living with a rare disease which only affects 15 in every 100,000 people , namely generalised Myasthenia Gravis (MG), I myself faced intersectionality when enduring the physically and mentally draining process of diagnosis where I was left questioning both my able yet anxious self and aspects of our very own extraordinary yet flawed healthcare system. But how can we fundamentally act upon such flaws when those facing these issues do not feel empowered enough to voice it?
The distinguishing differences
In order to understand the disadvantages that victims of intersectionality face, we have to understand the differences that make us, and I say “us” as I regrettably know from experience, stand out. Race, religion, and gender are often the forefront themes when it comes to uncovering issues regarding discrimination, however, many more potent factors are often brushed under the carpet such as income and age. In a 2017 article, the impact of income was highlighted and the dichotomy outlined here between races is, in my opinion, utterly distressing; higher earnings in white populations were associated with better care yet in black communities, despite striving for and attaining higher earnings to attempt to bridge this overwhelming gap between white and black communities, this achievement was rewarded with lower care levels . An example of the latter less discussed factor, age, is a more personal matter. When going through the process of diagnosis at the age of 15, I was suffering from extreme fatigue secondary to my MG however I was dismissed, by more than one healthcare professional, as being a “teenager” or “being lazy”. This, understandably, left me feeling defeated, embarrassed, and ashamed; how dare I be wasting valuable NHS resources with my simple fatigue? Had it not been for the support of family and other healthcare professionals, my diagnosis would have gone unnoticed and would have been overlooked until it would have been too late for preventive action. Such toxic associations—whether linked with age, race, religion, or any other factor—feed into creating a discriminatory environment which pushes those from minority backgrounds towards the periphery. Ultimately, this has resulted in healthcare inequalities between ethnic minority and white communities which has been painfully highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic .
Coronavirus as a catalyst for inequality
Disconcertingly, the impact of the pandemic has compounded the issue of intersectionality within our chronically ailing healthcare system. Although immediate and overt damage has been done in regards with the harrowingly increased loss of life from black and minority ethnic (BAME) groups [5, 6], we must collectively attempt to make a concerted effort to minimise the inevitable distrust that the pandemic has left in its wake. This painful experience has shone light on the shortcomings of the NHS in regards with providing adequate protection for those belonging to BAME groups and, understandably, those belonging to such communities—whether patients or doctors—will be plagued with feelings of abandonment and disillusionment with the health and social care system [7, 8]. The underlying issues of intersectionality, combined with the negative experiences of the pandemic, put such groups at a colossal disadvantage when it comes to seeking care. Intrinsically, they may not want to approach the NHS again for fear of a repeated let down, mirroring the experience of the pandemic. Worse still, this can lead to community-wide avoidance of seeking support which would worsen and deepen the healthcare divide and disparities which already exist. To remedy this, the NHS must combat and solve these highlighted issues by actively engaging with these groups—whether through community campaigns, targeted support, or nationwide education programmes—to inform the public about the advancements in equality of care. It is our duty to ensure that such communities do not lose the amazing healthcare that is available at their fingertips which they deserve just as equally as any other citizen.
Discrepancies in amenities, access, and life expectancy
Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that these problems existed beforehand and that the pandemic merely amplified rather than initiated such a discriminatory divide within the healthcare system. Ashamedly, several studies in Europe have confirmed this unsettling link between discriminatory behaviour and lesser standards of care . Particularly in the UK, we are guilty of not tackling the disparity in life expectancy, between wealthy and poorer areas, vigorously enough. This form of discrimination is often overlooked and rather than being associated with less resources being employed at the point of care, this discrepancy arises due to poorer communities not knowing how or simply not being able to access preventive care. A study in Scotland found that not only does this life expectancy gap differ between rich and poor, but a gap also exists amongst men and women within each area respectively; in affluent areas, women and men have 22.6 and 23.8 more years of health, respectively, compared to those living in areas of deprivation . Evidently, if such populations are unable to access preventive care services such as screening programmes, lifestyle advice or community improvement projects, then this will undoubtedly result in decreased health and, with time, onset of disease. The wide-reaching impacts of intersectionality are tiring and draining and are, quite literally, ageing certain groups more rapidly than others. However, we must revitalise these populations through renewed hope of a better future; we must signpost preventive care services better, we must ensure better outreach to such communities and, foremost, we must bridge this life expectancy gap.
Intersectionality and I
Despite having addressed some of these issues arising from intersectionality in their own right, it must be understood that these problems rarely occur in isolation but rather, are compounded into a single patient experience. Now, as this discussion draws to a close, I would like to reflect on my own experience as a rare disease patient who has been subjected to several of the traps spun in the web of intersectionality. As a young, female, Arab, Myasthenia Gravis patient I have experienced various forms of discrimination. As aforementioned, as a young patient my concerns were taken lightly and automatically deemed secondary to the misinformed stereotype of the lazy, carefree, lifestyle of a teenager. Yet, at the same time, I was assumed to be an adult in respect with no longer needing the support of family and friends, exemplified when I was delivered a lifelong diagnosis over the phone alone at the age of 15. As a female, it was also assumed that my fatigue and myasthenic symptoms were merely due to ‘time of the month’. And finally, as an Arab, I have faced the most prominent forms of discrimination, possibly surprisingly in the form of racial micro-aggression; whether manifesting as healthcare professionals not attempting to pronounce my name properly during appointments or as simple acts while attempting to create natural conversation such as asking, “So where are you really from?” Interestingly, in stark contrast to the vast majority of rare diseases which are genetic or Mendelian in origin, Myasthenia Gravis is an autoimmune condition whereby the body mistakenly produces autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) on the motor end plate of muscle fibres, resulting in fatigable muscle weakness . MG is one of the 20% of rare diseases which are non-genetic in origin ; undoubtedly, this too contributed towards littering my diagnosis journey with yet more hurdles and obstacles to overcome. Moreover, although not vastly dissimilar, reaching a diagnosis for autoimmune diseases takes roughly 4.5 years which is marginally longer than the respective timeframe for rare diseases in general which is roughly 4 years [13,14,15]. Nevertheless, for both genetic and non-genetic rare disease patients constituting the 1 in 17 affected by rare diseases during their lifetime, the aforementioned difficulties which we must tackle are universal [16, 17].
Inherent intersectionality issues within the wider rare disease community
Unfortunately, yet unsurprisingly, many parallels can be drawn between my own experiences and those of my fellow rare disease patients as exemplified by a study showing that ultra-rare diseases, particularly those in children, are not provided adequate funding and resources for research purposes . This, once again, highlights how age can be a prominent factor contributing to intersectionality. To contextualise how serious this issue is, 75% of rare diseases impact children and, of those affected, 30% will not live beyond the age of 5 . Furthermore, regarding the subject of race, a study involving sickle cell patients and their families found that a staggering 50% believed that their race and ethnicity had a significant impact on the quality of care they received . Further catalysing this issue of inequalities in care is the problem whereby accessing appropriate treatment often proves arduous, which is coupled with the difficulty that many healthcare professionals often refuse to administer treatment in the first instance . Disconcertingly, what is of even more concern is that the 2021 Rare Barometer Survey outlined that an overwhelming 39% of respondents felt discriminated against solely on the basis of their rare disease . All of these perpetual and systemic discrimination factors, along with the often unchanging rare disease diagnosis, compound to create a negative mental environment whereby the patient is plunged into the depths of feelings of worthlessness, sadness and powerlessness. Therefore, in order to tackle intersectionality, we must not only take down each brick of discrimination that blocks the path to equality but bring down the whole wall simultaneously.
Advancing and innovating rare disease care
Moving forward, it cannot be denied that there is more that could be done to prevent intersectionality from compounding the countless issues that rare disease communities already face. With the European Union showing solidarity with the rare disease community by investing almost €2 billion in over 300 projects during the last 15 years, we are undoubtedly on the path to curing many of these enigmatic conditions . However, the actions taken to combat the chronic and seemingly incurable issue of intersectionality do not have to be as monumental. For example, this could be as simple as healthcare professionals regularly asking patients and carers for their opinions on the care they are receiving. This could be seamlessly incorporated into check-up and follow-up appointments as part of routine care to better identify issues before they become fully established, elevating patient experiences. Moreover, more open and honest conversation must be facilitated between patients and healthcare providers to allow potential issues to be discussed, however, this is only possible if we collectively tackle the stigma associated with discussing racism and discrimination. Those who perpetuate racist and discriminatory behaviour, which feeds into creating a culture of isolating intersectionality, often fail or refuse to recognise that they are in the wrong. Sadly, this is often due to the blame culture present within our society today. Now, we must move away from such trapping behaviours and adapt to become proactive; we must learn from our mistakes, we must learn to respect everyone and, above all, we must learn about each other.
An international and individual issue, yet to be addressed
Striving for healthcare excellence means that we must address the divisions and discrimination, often caused by systemic intersectionality issues, which are deeply ingrained within current ‘accepted’ standards of practice. As highlighted earlier, intersectionality is not only an international issue hindering our generation but is also an individual issue for myself as a rare disease patient. As both a Myasthenia Gravis patient and medical student, and aspiring future doctor, I hope for the wider global population of rare disease patients and myself that we—healthcare professionals and patients in unison—can collectively bridge the gap that intersectionality has generated in our healthcare system and eradicate the international, yet individual, issues arising from intersectionality.
Availability of data and materials
National Health Service
Coronavirus Disease 2019
Black and Minority Ethnic
Epi cell, Surveillance cell and Health Intelligence team; Public Health England. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.
Spillane J, Higham E, Kullmann DM. Myasthenia gravis. BMJ. 2012;345: e8497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8497.
Elahi AS. Coronavirus: BAME doctors feel 'let down' over risk checks. 2020. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53021628. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.
Perkin M, Heap S, Crerar-Gilbert A, et al. Deaths in people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities from both COVID-19 and non-COVID causes in the first weeks of the pandemic in London: a hospital case note review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10): e040638. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040638.
Public Health Scotland. What are health inequalities? 2021. http://www.healthscotland.scot/health-inequalities/what-are-health-inequalities. Accessed 17 Oct 2021.
Rivenbark JG, Ichou M. Discrimination in healthcare as a barrier to care: experiences of socially disadvantaged populations in France from a nationally representative survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8124-z.
Oxford English Dictionary. Intersectionality. 2015. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/429843?redirectedFrom=intersectionality&. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.
Raleigh V, Holmes J; The King's Fund. The health of people from ethnic minority groups in England. 2021. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/health-people-ethnic-minority-groups-england. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.
BMA. Sewell report ignores ‘well-documented’ evidence of structural racism in the NHS, says BMA. 2021. https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/sewell-report-ignores-well-documented-evidence-of-structural-racism-in-the-nhs-says-bma. Accessed 17 Oct 2021.
Stepanikova I, Oates G. Perceived discrimination and privilege in health care: the role of socioeconomic status and race. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(1):S86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.024.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Myasthenia gravis fact sheet. 2020. https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Myasthenia-Gravis-Fact-Sheet. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
World Health Organization. Priority medicines for Europe and the World “a public health approach to innovation”. Background Paper 6.19 Rare Diseases. 2013. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_19Rare.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
Doghramji PP. Screening and laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune diseases using antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence assay and specific autoantibody testing. 2016. https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/about_us/sponsored_resources/Quest_%20ANA-IFA_Monograph.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2022.
Benaroya Research Institute. Diagnosing autoimmune diseases. 2017. https://www.benaroyaresearch.org/blog/post/diagnosing-autoimmune-diseases#:~:text=Being%20diagnosed%20with%20an%20autoimmune%20disease%2C%20such%20as,period%20the%20patient%20typically%20has%20seen%20four%20doctors. Accessed 9 Feb 2022.
Rare Disease UK. Illuminating the rare reality. 2019. https://www.raredisease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/02/Illuminating-the-rare-reality-2019.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2022.
Genetic Alliance UK. Rare diseases. 2016. https://geneticalliance.org.uk/information/learn-about-genetics/chromosomal-disorders-2/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
Forman J. Health inequalities and need associated with rare diseases. In: Dew K, Matheson A, editors. Understanding health inequalities in Aotearoa. Dunedin: Otago University Press; 2008. p. 18–18.
Raïs Ali S, Tubeuf S. (In)-equality in the allocation of R&D resources for rare diseases. Soc Justice Res. 2019;32(3):277–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00332-w.
UK Health Departments. Equality analysis: UK plan for rare diseases. 2012. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215142/dh_132882.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
Nelson SC, Hackman HW. Race matters: perceptions of race and racism in a sickle cell center. Paediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;60(3):451–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24361.
Kole A, Faurisson F. Rare diseases social epidemiology: analysis of inequalities. In: Posada de la Paz M, Groft S, editors. Rare diseases epidemiology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 223–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_14.
Eurordis Rare Diseases Europe. Rare disease patients’ opinion on the future of rare diseases. 2021. https://download2.eurordis.org/rbv/rare2030survey/reports/RARE2030_survey_public_report_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
European Union. EU research on rare diseases. 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/health-research-and-innovation/rare-diseases_en. Accessed 11 Feb 2022.
I would like to say a special thank you to my amazing family—my parents Ahmed and Amina and siblings Fatima and Ali—for believing in me even when I did not have the strength to believe in myself and for the healthcare professionals who believed my symptoms even when their colleagues did not; a sentiment I am sure is mirrored by many of my fellow rare disease battlers. Without the constant support and encouragement of my loving family, I know that I would not have become the strong, fierce, independent woman that I am today. No words can express the extent of my gratitude. For their unparalleled and unfaltering belief, I am eternally grateful.
Publication Fee waived by Student Voice Prize.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
I consent for my manuscript to be published.
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article exposes the true meaning of intersectionality and is complemented and contextualised by personal experiences of the author.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Alani, Z. Exploring intersectionality: an international yet individual issue. Orphanet J Rare Dis 17, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02255-3
- Generalised Myasthenia Gravis
- Rare disease