Skip to main content
Download PDF

Biochemical and genetic characteristics of patients with primary carnitine deficiency identified through newborn screening

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases volume 16, Article number: 503 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Primary carnitine deficiency (PCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder of carnitine transportation that leads to impaired fatty acid oxidation. Large-scale studies on newborn screening (NBS) for PCD are limited. This study aimed to investigate the biochemical and genetic characteristics of patients with PCD detected through NBS.

Results

A total of 548 247 newborns were screened for PCD between January 2014 and June 2021; 1714 newborns with low free carnitine (C0) levels were called back and 49 patients were diagnosed with PCD. The latest incidence rate in Quanzhou, China, was estimated to be 1 in 11 189 newborns. NBS results showed that the 49 patients had varying degrees of decreased C0 levels, whereas seven patients exhibited normal C0 levels during the recall review. All patients harbored biallelic pathogenic variants of the SLC22A5 gene. Nineteen distinct SLC22A5 variants were detected in these 49 patients, and most of the detected variants were clustered in exons 1, 4, and 7. The top eight variants had an allele frequency of 86.73%. The most common variant was c.760C > T (p.R254*) with an allele frequency of 31.63%, followed by c.51C > G (p.F17L) (17.35%) and c.1400C > G (p.S467C) (16.33%). The C0 level of patients with the N/N genotype was significantly lower than that of the M/M group. The C0 levels of patients with genotypes of R254*/R254* and R254*/F17L were far lower than those of patients with the R254*/S467C genotype.

Conclusions

This study presented more than 500,000 NBS data with the latest incidence of 1:11 189 in the Quanzhou area. The SLC22A5 variant spectrum in the selected southern Chinese population has been updated. Patients with null variants were associated with low C0 levels. Combining NBS with genetic testing is critical to improve screening efficiency because patients with PCD may have normal C0 levels during NBS and recall review.

Background

Primary carnitine deficiency (PCD, OMIM #212140) is an autosomal recessive disorder of carnitine transportation that leads to impaired fatty acid oxidation. The causative gene, SLC22A5 (MIM# 603377), was mapped to chromosome 5q31 and encodes the organic cation transporter novel 2 (OCTN2) [1, 2]. Patients with this defect experience continuous renal loss of carnitine, defective ketogenesis, and low serum carnitine levels, resulting in muscle weakness and pain, as well as cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias. The clinical presentation of PCD shows obvious variability ranging from no clinical symptoms to acute metabolic decompensation early in life, progressive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy later in life, or even sudden death from cardiac arrhythmia [3,4,5,6]. Lifelong high-dose carnitine supplementation is recommended for patients with PCD regardless of the severity of presentation, and the long-term prognosis is favorable with timely treatment [7].

Newborn screening (NBS) is a useful preventive health measure for early diagnosis and has been demonstrated to be economically efficient. Given that PCD is a well-treatable metabolic disease and adverse symptoms can be prevented, PCD has been included in many NBS panels worldwide. NBS for PCD was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), by measuring free carnitine (C0) levels below the cut-off value in dried blood spot samples. The diagnosis of PCD after NBS is confirmed by genetic analysis of the SLC22A5 gene or by verifying reduced carnitine transport activity in fibroblasts [8, 9]. The measurement of carnitine transport activity is a reliable diagnostic assay, but it is only performed in a few laboratories worldwide and requires a skin biopsy. Therefore, genetic testing is mainly used for diagnostic confirmation. However, it is noteworthy that some disease-causing pathogenic variants can escape detection because the genetic diagnostic yield for PCD has been relatively low [10].

Although several reports of PCD NBS in the Chinese population have been reported, the screened number and confirmed positive patients are relatively limited [11,12,13]. The expanded NBS program was implemented in Quanzhou, China, in January 2014. To date, more than 500,000 newborns have been screened for PCD. In this study, we report our experience with NBS for PCD over 8 years in southern China. We sought to determine the latest incidence, biochemical, and genetic features of PCD identified using NBS. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the genotype and biochemical phenotype of patients with PCD.

Results

NBS for PCD

Overall, 548 247 newborns were screened for PCD during the study period. NBS results showed that 1714 newborns had low C0 levels, yielding a positivity rate of 0.31% (1714/548 247). Forty-nine patients with biallelic pathogenic variants in SLC22A5 were diagnosed with PCD, and the positive predictive value was approximately 2.86% (49/1714). Consequently, the incidence rate in Quanzhou was estimated to be 1 in 11 189 newborns. In addition, six maternal patients with PCD were identified because of low C0 levels in their infants.

Biochemical features

The initial NBS results showed that 49 patients had varying degrees of decreased C0 levels. The mean C0 level at NBS in this cohort was 4.16 ± 1.78 μmol/L (range 1.63–8.25, cut-off value: 8.5–50 μmol/L). In comparison, seven patients (14.3%) (nos. 15, 16, 26, 27, 30, 37, and 42) exhibited normal C0 levels during the recall review. The mean C0 level was increased to 4.69 ± 3.01 μmol/L on the second screen (range 1.05–14.27, cut-off value: 8.5–50 μmol/L) (Table 1).

Table 1 Biochemical and genetic characteristics of 49 patients with primary carnitine deficiency (PCD)
Full size table

SLC22A5 variants and allele distributions

Forty-nine patients with biallelic pathogenic variants in the SLC22A5 gene were eventually diagnosed with PCD. A total of 19 distinct SLC22A5 variants were detected in these 49 patients. Of these, 63.2% (12/19) were missense, 21.1% (4/19) were nonsense, 10.5% (2/19) were frameshift variants, and 5.3% (1/19) affected splicing. All variants have been previously reported, and most of the detected variants were clustered in exons 1, 4, and 7. The most common variant was c.760C > T (p.R254*) with an allele frequency of 31.63%, followed by c.51C > G (p.F17L) (17.35%) and c.1400C > G (p.S467C) (16.33%). The other relatively common variants were c.695C > T (p.T232M), c.338G > A (p.C113Y), c.1139C > T (p.A380V), c.797C > T (p.P266L), and c.1195C > T (p.R399W). Together, these eight variants accounted for 86.73% (85/98) of all mutated alleles (Table 2).

Table 2 SLC22A5 variants and allele distributions in patients with primary carnitine deficiency (PCD)
Full size table

Relationship between genotype and biochemical phenotype

The patients with PCD were divided into three groups: (i) N/N (null/null, n = 8), (ii) N/M (null/missense, n = 22), and (iii) M/M (missense/missense, n = 19). As shown in Fig. 1a, the medians of the N/N, N/M, and M/M groups were 2.43, 3.53, and 5.02, respectively. The C0 level of patients with the N/N genotype was significantly lower than that of the M/M group (P = 0.001). Compared to the N/M group, patients with the N/N genotype also had a low C0 level, however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.055). The C0 level was not significantly different between the N/M and M/M groups (P = 0.304).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the low free carnitine (C0) concentrations (μmol/L) in patients with primary carnitine deficiency (PCD) with different genotypes. N/N: null/null; N/M: null/missense; M/M: missense/missense. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) above a bracket connecting two groups

Full size image

Patients with c.760C > T (p.R254*) and two other common variants were grouped. There were 6, 4, and 8 patients with the R254*/R254* genotype, R254*/F17L genotype, and R254*/S467C genotype, respectively. The mean C0 levels in patients with genotypes of R254*/R254*, R254*/F17L, and R254*/S467C were 2.66 ± 0.84, 2.82 ± 0.66, and 5.32 ± 1.61 μmol/L, respectively. The C0 levels of patients with genotypes of R254*/R254* and R254*/F17L were far lower than those of patients with the R254*/S467C genotype (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively) (Fig. 1b).

Discussion

PCD is the most common fatty acid metabolic disorder in China. NBS for PCD has been successfully implemented in most parts of China, and patients usually have an improved prognosis following early L-carnitine therapy. However, NBS for PCD is loaded with a high rate of false-positive results, which appears to be inevitable because the C0 concentration at birth is easily affected by maternal and other factors. Our data showed that NBS for PCD had a high false-positive rate (97.14%) and a low positive predictive value (2.86%), which is very similar to that reported in Taiwan (3%) [14] and California (4.7%) [15]. The incidence of PCD varies greatly throughout China, ranging from 1:8938 to 1:48 717 [13, 16, 17]. The largest-scale NBS study in China showed that the incidence of PCD was 1:30 182 in Zhejiang Province [7]. This study presented more than 500 000 NBS data, indicating that the latest incidence in the Quanzhou area was 1:11 189, which is similar to the incidence recently reported in Guangzhou (1:13 345) and Ningbo (1:16 595) areas [17, 18]. It is noteworthy that the actual incidence of PCD should be higher than reported because the current MS/MS-based NBS has poor sensitivity [19, 20].

NBS results showed that all 49 patients had low C0 levels, although some patients may have normal C0 levels during recall review. These patients were excluded from conventional NBS but could be identified by incorporating second-tier genetic screening [21]. However, it is noteworthy that patients with PCD are also easily missed during NBS because the C0 levels at birth could be affected by the maternal concentration, and therefore, cannot reflect the true levels of the newborns themselves. Luo et al. [22] recently conducted a pilot study in which genetic screening was performed on only 1127 neonates using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), and one PCD case of false-negative (C0 = 11.6 μmol/L) was identified. Therefore, NBS for PCD faces challenges, and combining NBS with genetic testing is crucial to improve screening efficiency.

This study updated the SLC22A5 variant spectrum in a southern Chinese population. The top eight variants together had an allele frequency of 86.73%, which provided important evidence for the rapid screening of targeted SLC22A5 variants in the Chinese population. Many studies have shown that c.51C > G (p.F17L), c.760C > T (p.R254*), and c.1400C > G (p.S467C) are the three most common variants in the Chinese population, but the variant with the highest frequency varies among diverse regions. For instance, c.1400C > G (p.S467C) was the most frequent variant in the Jining, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Xuzhou, and Ningbo areas [12, 17, 18, 23, 24], and c.51C > G (p.F17L) was the most common variant in the Liuzhou area [25]. In contrast, our data revealed that c.760C > T (p.R254*) was the most common variant in this cohort of patients, and its allele frequency was almost equal to the sum of the other two variants. c.760C > T (p.R254*) is a loss-of-function variant that can cause severe clinical symptoms, which is common in southern China but rarely detected in northern China [14, 16, 24, 26, 27], indicating that this variant presented different geographic distributions. Although c.1400C > G (p.S467C) with residual function may result in a mild phenotype, it was common in both southern and northern China [14, 16, 24, 26], suggesting that this variant is common in the general Chinese population.

Regarding the relationship between genotype and biochemical phenotype, significant differences were observed in C0 levels between patients with N/N and M/M genotypes, and compared to the N/M group, most patients with N/N genotype had low C0 levels, indicating that patients with null variants were associated with low C0 levels. Notably, patients with the N/M genotype may also have very low C0 levels if the missense variant has markedly impaired transport activity. As demonstrated in Fig. 1b, no significant difference was observed in the C0 levels between patients with genotypes of R254*/R254* and R254*/F17L. In contrast, a significant difference was observed in C0 levels between patients with genotypes of R254*/R254* and R254*/S467C because c.1400C > G (p.S467C) retained residual carnitine transport activity.

A major limitation of this study was that patients were diagnosed solely using exome sequencing that focused on the coding regions of the targeted genes. Therefore, disease-causing pathogenic variants in regulatory regions or deep introns, as well as large deletions or duplications, cannot be detected using targeted NGS. In particular, the recently identified c.-149G > A variant in the 5 untranslated region (UTR) of SLC22A5 was regarded as a frequent cause of PCD, but it was not covered by our targeted NGS. According to the diagnostic criteria of this study, newborns with one or no SLC22A5 variants were automatically classified as not affected, and a small number of newborns may actually have PCD but not come to our attention. Therefore, more patients may be positive for PCD, and the actual incidence should be higher than reported.

Conclusions

In summary, this study presented more than 500 000 NBS data with the latest incidence of 1:11 189 in the Quanzhou area. The SLC22A5 variant spectrum in the selected southern Chinese population was updated, and the top eight variants together had an allele frequency of 86.73%, and c.760C > T (p.R254*) was the most common variant. Patients with null variants were associated with low C0 levels. Combining NBS with genetic testing is critical to improve screening efficiency because patients with PCD may have normal C0 levels during NBS and recall review.

Methods

Study population

From January 2014 to June 2021, a total of 548 247 newborns (309 684 men and 238 563 women) who were born in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China, were screened using MS/MS at the NBS center at Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital. All screen-positive newborns and patients genetically diagnosed with PCD (compound heterozygous or homozygous for SLC22A5 pathogenic variants) were recruited for this study. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Quanzhou Maternity and Children’s Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all patients.

NBS and diagnostic evaluation

Specimen collection, delivery, and laboratory testing for NBS were performed as previously described [26]. Newborns with low C0 levels (C0 < 8.5 μmol/L, cut-off value: 8–50 μmol/L) were called back. Newborns who tested positive on the second screen were referred for further genetic analysis. Between January 2017 and December 2018, a second-tier newborn genetic screening program targeting 17 SLC22A5 variants was added to our NBS program [21]. Targeted NGS was performed to capture the exome of 94 known genes relevant to inherited metabolic disorders, as previously described [28]. Individuals with abnormal C0 levels and biallelic pathogenic variants in SLC22A5 were defined as PCD cases. Individuals with one or no pathogenic variants of SLC22A5 were excluded from this study.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as median ± standard deviation when normally distributed, and as median (interquartile range) when non-normally distributed. One-way ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used for the statistical comparisons. Differences between groups were considered significant when P < 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCD:

Primary carnitine deficiency

OCTN2:

Organic cation transporter type 2

NBS:

Newborn screening

MS/MS:

Tandem mass spectrometry

C0:

Free carnitine

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

N/N:

Null/null

N/M:

Null/missense

M/M:

Missense/missense

References

  1. 1.

    Nezu J, Tamai I, Oku A, Ohashi R, Yabuuchi H, Hashimoto N, et al. Primary systemic carnitine deficiency is caused by mutations in a gene encoding sodium ion-dependent carnitine transporter. Nat Genet. 1999;21(1):91–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tang NL, Ganapathy V, Wu X, Hui J, Seth P, Yuen PM, et al. Mutations of OCTN2, an organic cation/carnitine transporter, lead to deficient cellular carnitine uptake in primary carnitine deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(4):655–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Longo N. Primary carnitine deficiency and newborn screening for disorders of the carnitine cycle. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;68(Suppl 3):5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Magoulas PL, El-Hattab AW. Systemic primary carnitine deficiency: an overview of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    El-Hattab AW, Li FY, Shen J, Powell BR, Bawle EV, Adams DJ, et al. Maternal systemic primary carnitine deficiency uncovered by newborn screening: clinical, biochemical, and molecular aspects. Genet Med. 2010;12(1):19–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rasmussen J, Duno M, Lund AM, Steuerwald U, Hansen SH, Joensen HD, et al. Increased risk of sudden death in untreated Primary Carnitine Deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2019;43:290–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lin Y, Xu H, Zhou D, Hu Z, Zhang C, Hu L, et al. Screening 3.4 million newborns for primary carnitine deficiency in Zhejiang Province, China. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;507:199–204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Frigeni M, Balakrishnan B, Yin X, Calderon FRO, Mao R, Pasquali M, et al. Functional and molecular studies in primary carnitine deficiency. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(12):1684–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lin Y, Lin W, Chen Y, Lin C, Zheng Z, Zhuang J, et al. Combined primary carnitine deficiency with neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency in a Chinese newborn. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):478.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ferdinandusse S, Te Brinke H, Ruiter JPN, Haasjes J, Oostheim W, van Lenthe H, et al. A mutation creating an upstream translation initiation codon in SLC22A5 5’UTR is a frequent cause of primary carnitine deficiency. Hum Mutat. 2019;40(10):1899–904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang Y, Li H, Liu J, Yan H, Liu Q, Wei X, et al. Molecular investigation in Chinese patients with primary carnitine deficiency. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(9):e901.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhou W, Li H, Huang T, Zhang Y, Wang C, Gu M. Biochemical, molecular, and clinical characterization of patients with primary carnitine deficiency via large-scale newborn screening in Xuzhou Area. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun Y, Wang YY, Jiang T. Clinical features and genotyping of patients with primary carnitine deficiency identified by newborn screening. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;30(8):879–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee NC, Tang NL, Chien YH, Chen CA, Lin SJ, Chiu PC, et al. Diagnoses of newborns and mothers with carnitine uptake defects through newborn screening. Mol Genet Metab. 2010;100(1):46–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gallant NM, Leydiker K, Wilnai Y, Lee C, Lorey F, Feuchtbaum L, et al. Biochemical characteristics of newborns with carnitine transporter defect identified by newborn screening in California. Mol Genet Metab. 2017;122(3):76–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang R, Qiang R, Song C, Ma X, Zhang Y, Li F, et al. Spectrum analysis of inborn errors of metabolism for expanded newborn screening in a northwestern Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2699.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang X, Li Q, Wang F, Yan L, Zhuang D, Qiu H, et al. Newborn screening and genetic analysis identify six novel genetic variants for primary carnitine deficiency in Ningbo Area, China. Front Genet. 2021;12:686137.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huang YL, Tang CF, Liu SC, Sheng HY, Tang F, Jiang X, et al. Newborn screening for primary carnitine deficiency and variant spectrum of SLC22A5 gene in Guangzhou. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;58(6):476–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wilson C, Knoll D, de Hora M, Kyle C, Glamuzina E, Webster D. The decision to discontinue screening for carnitine uptake disorder in New Zealand. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2019;42(1):86–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Verbeeten KC, Lamhonwah AM, Bulman D, Faghfoury H, Chakraborty P, Tein I, et al. Carnitine uptake defect due to a 5’UTR mutation in a pedigree with false positives and false negatives on Newborn screening. Mol Genet Metab. 2020;129(3):213–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lin Y, Zhang W, Huang C, Lin C, Lin W, Peng W, et al. Increased detection of primary carnitine deficiency through second-tier newborn genetic screening. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Luo X, Sun Y, Xu F, Guo J, Li L, Lin Z, et al. A pilot study of expanded newborn screening for 573 genes related to severe inherited disorders in China: results from 1,127 newborns. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(17):1058.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang T, Ma J, Zhang Q, Gao A, Wang Q, Li H, et al. Expanded newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry in Suzhou, China: disease spectrum, prevalence, genetic characteristics in a Chinese population. Front Genet. 2019;10:1052.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yang C, Zhou C, Xu P, Jin X, Liu W, Wang W, et al. Newborn screening and diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism: a 5-year study in an eastern Chinese population. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;502:133–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tan J, Chen D, Chang R, Pan L, Yang J, Yuan D, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry screening for inborn errors of metabolism in newborns and high-risk infants in Southern China: disease spectrum and genetic characteristics in a Chinese population. Front Genet. 2021;12:631688.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lin Y, Zheng Q, Zheng T, Zheng Z, Lin W, Fu Q. Expanded newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders and genetic characteristics in a southern Chinese population. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;494:106–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tang NL, Hwu WL, Chan RT, Law LK, Fung LM, Zhang WM. A founder mutation (R254X) of SLC22A5 (OCTN2) in Chinese primary carnitine deficiency patients. Hum Mutat. 2002;20(3):232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lin Y, Wang W, Lin C, Zheng Z, Fu Q, Peng W, et al. Biochemical and molecular features of Chinese patients with glutaric acidemia type 1 detected through newborn screening. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants for their help and support. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province (Grant Nos. 2020J01130 and 2021J01538), the Youth Research Project in the Health System of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020QNA083), and the Quanzhou Municipal Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No. 2021C052R).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children’s Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China

    Yiming Lin, Yanru Chen, Zhenzhu Zheng, Qingliu Fu & Weihua Lin

  2. Administrative Office, Quanzhou Maternity and Children’s Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China

    Bangbang Lin

  3. Department of Neonatology, Quanzhou Maternity and Children’s Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China

    Weifeng Zhang

Authors
  1. Yiming Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bangbang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanru Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenzhu Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingliu Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weihua Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weifeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YM Lin performed the data analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript; BB Lin performed the statistical analyses; YR Chen, ZZ Zheng, and QL Fu followed the patients and collected the clinical data; WF Zhang assisted with data collection, reviewed and revised the manuscript; WH Lin supervised the research study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weihua Lin or Weifeng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all infants for collection of samples and publication of medical data.

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the parents of all patients for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Lin, B., Chen, Y. et al. Biochemical and genetic characteristics of patients with primary carnitine deficiency identified through newborn screening. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16, 503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-02126-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-02126-3

Keywords

  • Primary carnitine deficiency
  • Newborn screening
  • SLC22A5 gene
  • Free carnitine
  • Tandem mass spectrometry

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172