Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: outstanding questions and future directions

  • 1, 2,
  • 3, 4,
  • 4, 5,
  • 4, 5,
  • 6,
  • 7, 10,
  • 7, 8, 10,
  • 9,
  • 7, 10,
  • 7, 10,
  • 7, 10,
  • 7, 10,
  • 11 and
  • 7, 10Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201813:114

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0856-9

  • Received: 5 February 2018
  • Accepted: 26 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a rare hereditary condition that leads to decreased circulating alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) levels, significantly increasing the risk of serious lung and/or liver disease in children and adults, in which some aspects remain unresolved.

Methods

In this review, we summarise and update current knowledge on alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in order to identify and discuss areas of controversy and formulate questions that need further research.

Results

1) AATD is a highly underdiagnosed condition. Over 120,000 European individuals are estimated to have severe AATD and more than 90% of them are underdiagnosed.

Conclusions

2) Several clinical and etiological aspects of the disease are yet to be resolved. New strategies for early detection and biomarkers for patient outcome prediction are needed to reduce morbidity and mortality in these patients; 3) Augmentation therapy is the only specific approved therapy that has shown clinical efficacy in delaying the progression of emphysema. Regrettably, some countries reject registration and reimbursement for this treatment because of the lack of larger randomised, placebo-controlled trials. 4) Alternative strategies are currently being investigated, including the use of gene therapy or induced pluripotent stem cells, and non-augmentation strategies to prevent AAT polymerisation inside hepatocytes.

Keywords

  • Rare respiratory diseases
  • Alpha-1 antitrypsin
  • Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • SERPINA1
  • Augmentation therapy
  • COPD
  • Cirrhosis
  • Panniculitis
  • Vasculitis

Background

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a rare hereditary condition characterised by low circulating levels of the alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein, a serine protease inhibitor synthesised and secreted mainly by hepatocytes, that protects lung tissues from damage caused by proteolytic enzymes such as neutrophil elastase (NE). The AAT protein is encoded by the SERPINA1 gene and over 120 mutations have been reported at this locus [1, 2]. The commonest deficiency variants are the S and Z forms (as opposed to the normal wild-type M allele). The Z allele (both in homozygosis and heterozygosis) leads to misfolding and polymerisation of the protein, which accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of the hepatocytes, leading to chronic liver disease in some individuals. Hepatocyte damage is believed to be caused by ER stress, ER overload response, mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy, although the pathophysiology is still unclear. Some AAT mutations (those that destabilise the protein dramatically) do not polymerise and cause ER stress, triggering the ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) system and the unfolded protein response (UPR), (Fig. 1) whereas mutations that cause ordered polymerisation of the protein (such the Z allele) trigger an ER overload response that involves calcium-dependent nuclear factor (NF)-κB signalling and a pro-inflammatory response. The S mutated protein is retained within the hepatocytes although it does not form intrahepatic polymers unless the Z allele is present in keeping with less retention in the hepatocytes, absence of liver disease and intermediate plasma levels [35]. Although much of the misfolded protein is eliminated either by ERAD or by autophagy, a proportion is folded correctly and secreted into the circulation [6]. As a consequence, lower circulating plasma levels of AAT are found in patients with AATD, resulting in incapacity to inhibit NE efficiently. This leads to parenchymal lung destruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) development, a situation that is exacerbated by smoking and occupational exposure to dust and fumes [1, 7, 8]. In rare cases, AATD has also been associated with other conditions such as necrotising panniculitis and systemic vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis; GPA) although this connection is less well established since a variety of genotypes, some with circulating values in the normal range, are associated with GPA [7, 9, 10].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) initiation. Properly folded proteins (Green arrows) are processed at the Golgi apparatus and then translocated to their destination sites. Misfolded proteins (Red arrows) are retained in the ER lumen and are degraded by the ER-associated protein degradation machinery (ERAD). Under certain pathological situations misfolded proteins aggregate and accumulate into the ER lumen triggering a condition called ER stress (Blue arrows). In response to ER stress, the cell activates the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR), in which accumulated misfolded proteins are sensed by inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), activating factor 6 (ATF6) and protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) proteins. IRE1 protein dimerises, auto-phosphorylates and activates its endoribonuclease activity, which removes a small intron of the transcription factor X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1u) that is then converted in XBP1s which acts as a transcriptional activator. ATF6 is cleaved and activated in the Golgi apparatus to yield a transcription factor (ATF6c) that migrates to the nucleus where activates the transcription of UPR target genes. PERK also dimerises and phosphorylates the eukaryotic translation initiation 2α (eIF2α), which attenuates most translation but stimulates translation of the transcription factor ATF4, which in turn activates genes to protect cells against the ER stress. The UPR signalling consists of four mechanisms: i) decreased translation to prevent further misfolded protein accumulation; ii) induction of ER chaperones to increase folding capacity; iii) induction of ERAD genes to increase degradation of misfolded proteins and iv) induction of apoptosis to remove stressed cells

Recent research has shown that AATD is characterised by neutrophilic inflammation and the disease is increasingly recognised as a neutrophil-driven inflammatory disorder both in the lung and with other systemic manifestations [11]. Beyond its antiprotease activity, AAT has anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory features which open up a rationale for its potential use in other inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, cystic fibrosis and asthma [1214].

AATD is a highly underdiagnosed condition. Since the first symptoms resemble other respiratory pathologies, initial clinical diagnosis can be difficult especially in neonates and children [2]. A recent study has estimated the frequency of the PIS and PIZ alleles in 97 countries worldwide; more than 180,000 (0.1%) and 1.2 million (0.7%) individuals are estimated to have PIZZ and PISZ phenotypes respectively, most of them remaining undiagnosed [9, 1517]. Early diagnosis is important to allow physicians to take preventive measures and initiate appropriate treatment when necessary [18]. Clinical data indicates that the severity of the symptoms found in AATD patients is highly variable and neither AAT serum levels nor phenotype are sufficient to identify which patients will develop severe lung or liver disease [19]. New strategies for early detection and biomarkers for patient outcome prediction are therefore needed to reduce morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Augmentation therapy is the only specific approved therapy to treat the pulmonary disease in patients with severe AATD [20]. However, the use of this therapy is controversial [21]. New treatment options are currently being investigated, including the use of gene therapy or induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs), and non-augmentation strategies to prevent AAT polymerisation inside hepatocytes.

In the light of the above, the AATD field is rapidly evolving with new and exciting discoveries. In order to summarise the current knowledge, identify areas of controversy and formulate questions that need further research a review of the scientific literature on AATD has been undertaken with a particular focus on recent advances in the field.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: A Paediatricians’ perspective

From a respiratory point of view, AATD is generally an adult-onset condition, so that there are usually no notable clinical differences between children with or without AATD. Recurrent respiratory manifestations in a child diagnosed with AATD are not necessarily caused by the disease, but may be an exacerbating factor in the progression of an underlying respiratory problem [22]. Therefore, paediatricians should aim to prevent respiratory infections and control the signs or symptoms of bronchial hyper-reactivity in these patients by administering the appropriate vaccines indicated for the child’s age, including hepatitis A and B, pneumococcal 13-valent vaccines, and an annual influenza vaccine.

Although AATD-associated liver disease can present from birth to old age, AATD is the most frequent cause of metabolic liver disease in paediatric patients [2325] and the second most common indication for liver transplantation after biliary atresia [26]. The clinical course of AATD-related liver disease is highly variable and it is still unknown why some individuals develop AATD-related liver disease while others do not [27]. The majority of infants with homozygous severe AATD (PiZZ) are asymptomatic and clinically recover in early childhood; however, about 10–50% develop some form of liver abnormality, including elevated liver enzymes, cholestatic neonatal hepatitis, hepatomegaly and nutritional problems which may persist throughout childhood [28, 29]. Results from the Swedish newborn screening study have shown that the risk of life-threatening liver disease in childhood is approximately 5% [29]. In fact, only 2–3% develop fibrosis or cirrhosis requiring transplantation during childhood [30]. A recent systematic literature review was performed aimed at providing clarification on the clinical course of AATD in children and adults and to assess the clinical effectiveness of liver transplantation [27]. In children, liver cirrhosis was reported in 7.5% of patients, abnormal liver function tests in 9%, portal hypertension in 6.9%, jaundice in 1.9% and liver transplantation in 16.5%. No cases of hepatocellular carcinoma were reported, suggesting that it is a rare event. Risk factors for liver disease development such as serum bilirubin, pattern of clinical jaundice, portal hypertension and bile duct proliferation have been identified, but no clear pattern has been established. Mortality ranged from 0% in a small study of 10 PIZZ children who develop neonatal cholestasis and were followed until 20 years of age, to 25.5% in a cohort of 98 PIZZ/PISZ patients. Data also indicate that mortality due to AATD-associated liver disease has significantly decreased since the end of the 1980s, when liver transplantation became standard practice to treat patients with terminal illness associated with liver disease, and outcomes following liver transplantation were excellent regarding survival (74 to 92%) and quality of life in survivors, with no recurrence of liver disease or pulmonary complications, indicating that liver transplantation is an effective treatment for liver disease due to AATD [27].

These data, together with the fact that AATD is an autosomal codominant congenital disease, mean that paediatricians should aim to diagnose the disease in: i) all infants with persistent unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, elevated transaminases, neonatal hepatitis syndrome, or other evidence of liver damage; ii) older children with chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, or portal hypertension; iii) children of patients with AATD [31].

Diagnosis

Screening and laboratory and clinical diagnosis

Current recommendation documents and guidelines recommend/advise testing AAT levels in target populations, including individuals with COPD regardless of age or ethnicity, unexplained chronic liver disease, necrotising panniculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, or unexplained bronchiectasis, and parents, siblings, and children, as well as the extended family of individuals identified with an abnormal gene for AAT. In these latter cases, AAT level testing alone is not recommended because it does not fully characterise disease risk from AATD although some guidelines advocate both AAT plasma levels and genotype for at least the S and Z alleles as initial testing [3234].

Despite these recommendations AATD is a largely under-recognised condition [35]. Patients experience long diagnostic delays (up to 5.6 years) and often visit several doctors before the definitive diagnosis is reached [36]. With fewer than 10% of affected individuals being clinically diagnosed, AATD targeted detection is key to identifying potential cases [37]. Improving the use of this targeted detection starts by raising physician awareness [35]. Although typical cases tend to present at younger ages with lower lobe emphysema, in reality there is no single patient characteristic that can help raise suspicion: AATD cases have been detected in patients with different types of COPD, bronchiectasis, asthma, and in non-smoking individuals [38]. Newborn screening has several pros and cons and is currently not recommended, with the possible exception of countries with a high prevalence of AATD and smoking, where adequate counselling services are available [39]. In a nationwide neonatal screening for AATD carried out in Sweden between 1972 and 1974, 120 out of the 200,000 neonates screened were identified with a PIZ phenotype [28]. Follow up of this study has shown that the patients would rather know whether they are carrying a mutation since reduced smoking rates and cigarette smoke exposure in adulthood has been observed in patients that were diagnosed with AATD at birth [40, 41]. Based on these results and along with other considerations such as the high prevalence of the disease (1:6000–3500 similar to cystic fibrosis), the low cost of the diagnostic test, the diagnostic delay causing increased morbidity, and the existence of a treatment to delay lung disease progression, some authors consider that neonatal AATD diagnosis is appropriate [42]. On the other hand, other authors do not support neonatal screening reasoning that the financial and social costs outweigh the benefits and because there is no specific treatment for liver disease, which is the leading cause of childhood morbidity. Moreover, according to these authors, the reported changes in smoking behaviour in adulthood do not justify the social risks associated with neonatal AATD screening, such as family stress and inability to qualify for life insurance in some countries [43].

There is no single universally accepted laboratory algorithm for AATD diagnosis. According to current recommendations, quantitative serum AAT measurement in stable COPD patients is used as the initial screening test [38]. Recent publications have identified 104 mg/dL as a cut-off value for detecting PiZZ individuals with a negative predictive value of 99.8% [44]. However, there may be additional difficulties in identifying a threshold for detecting heterozygous carriers [45]. When the serum AAT concentration is lower than the reference range, the study should be completed with phenotyping and/or genotyping [46].

Stratification

Improved understanding of COPD pathogenesis together with new and better diagnostic techniques and increased clinicians’ awareness have shown that the clinical presentation of AATD-related COPD is not limited to purely emphysematous patients. Instead, as with non-AATD tobacco-related COPD, there is a wide range of disease presentations [47]. Accordingly, the confirmation of AATD should be followed by evaluating the specific clinical presentation in order to identify symptoms intensity and prognostic markers [48, 49].

Multidimensional tools and scales for determining AATD have been explored. The BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea, and exercise capacity) index was recently validated in a cohort of 191 AATD patients undergoing lung transplantation who were followed from 2006 to 2012. The authors found that the BODE index could better discriminate survival than both forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) alone and the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification. However, future trials will be required to elucidate the usefulness of the BODE index, or any other multidimensional scales, for treatment selection [50].

Additionally, different health status questionnaires and severity scores are available, including the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, the COPD severity score, the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions, the Living with COPD, and the COPD Assessment Test. Recently, an observational, cross-sectional study including 96 COPD patients (including 35 cases of AATD-related COPD) evaluated some of these questionnaires. Patients with AATD COPD showed a similar degree of health status impairment as those with non-AATD COPD. Additionally, there were stronger correlations between AATD COPD health status measurements and lung function impairment than for non-AATD COPD. Therefore, evidence regarding the performance of different questionnaires for more comprehensive evaluation of AATD patients is starting to accumulate [51].

Prognosis

The natural history and prognosis of AATD is variable. Most people with a severe deficiency have a lower life expectancy relative to the general population [52, 53], with the exception of never-smokers that were identified through family or population screening [54]. The risk of developing AATD-related diseases depends not only on which AAT deficient alleles the individual carries, but also on other factors and modifiers including genetic polymorphisms that can modulate gene expression or environmental factors such as smoking, air pollution and dust exposure for lung disease or alcohol intake for hepatic injury.

Early diagnosis (and treatment) is the key to improving the prognosis of AATD-related disease [55], because it promotes smoking cessation [56] preventing young individuals developing a smoking habit and raising awareness to avoid exposure to occupational respiratory pollutants [57].

Respiratory disease is the main prognostic factor for most AATD patients and is predominantly represented by early-onset emphysema (58–72%) [52, 53]. Cigarette smoking has an adverse effect on the course of lung disease and is by far the single most important risk factor for the development of rapidly progressive COPD in patients with AATD [39, 58]. Epidemiological studies have shown that ever-smokers with severe AATD have increased emphysema, lower diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) values and increased airflow obstruction and sputum production than never-smokers [57, 59, 60]. Similarly, active smokers have a greater annual loss of lung function than never-smokers and ex-smokers [61, 62]. In a recent study it was shown that PISZ patients were less susceptible to cigarette smoke than PIZZ patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that PISZ patients were less likely to have emphysema and had better survival than PIZZ patients, given the same level of smoke exposure, although the lung function decline did not differ significantly [63].

The risk of lung disease in PIMZ individuals has been controversial for years. This is of particular importance because of the high prevalence of PIMZ individuals, meaning that even a moderate increase in the risk of COPD would have a significant public health impact. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of COPD among PIMZ patients [64]. However, population-based studies showed no significant differences in FEV1 values between the PIMM and PIMZ groups, thus establishing an association between PIMZ and the development of COPD was complicated, partly due to the small number of patients included in these studies. However, later studies including a higher number of patients have demonstrated that ever-smokers PIMZ heterozygotes have and increased risk of COPD whereas there was no increased risk in never smokers. Moreover, in a family-based study it was shown that PIMZ individuals have a greater degree of airway obstruction than PIMM individuals with a similar degree of cigarette smoke exposure. Altogether, these results indicate that intensive counselling and PIMZ diagnosis is strongly advisable to avoid starting smoking in non-smokers or to help current smokers quit [56, 65, 66].

The severity of AATD-related liver disease is also highly variable. As noted above, it is the main clinical manifestation at paediatric ages but it can also affect adults, especially after the fifth decade of life, in some cases leading to severe forms of liver disease such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma that may eventually require liver transplantation. Approximately 50% of PiZZ homozygotes show evidence of on-going inflammatory activity in the liver, and 2 to 43% develop cirrhosis [67]. The risk for adult liver disease increases with age. In a study analysing the age distribution of AATD as a cause of severe liver disease (as defined by the need for a liver transplant) the authors found that 77.2% of the patients were adults, with a peak age range of 50–64 years [68]. Several studies have shown that individuals with PIMZ phenotype have an increased risk of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis compared to the general population although it seems that alcohol consumption and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are important factors in the development of liver disease in these patients [27].

Interestingly, adults with severe lung disease often do not develop liver disease and vice-versa. However, it has been shown that in adults, hepatic disease can coexist with pulmonary emphysema. In a study that included 57 patients with PiZZ AATD and established pulmonary disease, 63.2% had a history or clinical findings suggestive of liver disease and 17.5% showed evidence of advanced liver fibrosis [67].

Augmentation therapy: Advances and controversies

Intravenous infusion of AAT in AATD individuals protects the lungs from the action of uncontrolled neutrophil elastase, and hence, slows the progression of emphysema [69]. However, although augmentation therapy has proved to have biochemical efficacy in reaching and maintaining protective AAT levels in blood and lung tissue, its clinical efficacy has been questioned [20]. Table 1 includes the most relevant studies analysing the clinical efficacy of AAT treatment.
Table 1

Studies on augmentation therapy

Authors

Dose

Type of study

End Point

Results

Non-randomised studies

 Seersholm et al., 1999 [58]

60 mg/kg/7 days

Observational, with control group

(n = 295)

FEV1 decline

Less FEV1 decline in treated group (56 vs 75 ml/y; p = 0,02)

Greater benefit for patients with FEV1:31–65%

 American AAT Deficiency Registry Study Group, 1998 [50]

33%, weekly

43% biweekly

24% monthly

Observational, with control group

(n = 1129)

FEV1 decline

Mortality

Reduction of mortality (OR 0,64; p = 0,02)

Less FEV1 decline in patients with FEV1 35–49%, treated

(66 vs 93 mL/y; p = 0,03)

 Wencker et al., 2001 [59]

60 mg/kg/7 days

Observational cohort. No control group (n = 96)

FEV1 decline

Less FEV1 decline during treatment (49,2 vs 34,2 mL/Y, p = 0,019). Lowest decline in FEV1 > 65% (256 vs 53 ml/Y, p = 0,001)

 Tonelli et al., 2009 [60]

 

Observational with control group (n = 164)

FEV1 decline

Mortality

Increase in FEV1: 10.6 ± 21.4 mL/Y; p = 0.05).

No differences on mortality

Randomised studies

 Dirksen et al., 1999 [64]

250 mg/kg/28 days

RCT (n = 66)

FEV1:30–80%

FEV1 decline, lung density

No significant effects on lung function

Trend towards a favourable effect reducing loss of lung tissue

 Dirksen et al., 2009 [68]

60 mg/kg/7 days

RCT (n = 77)

FEV1:25–80%

Lung function, QoL, exacerbations, lung density

Reduction in loss of lung density measured by CT in treated patients (p = 0.049)

No differences on FEV1 or DLCO

No differences on exacerbations frequency

 Chapman et al., 2015 [72]

60 mg/kg/7 days

RCT (n = 180)

Pi*ZZ, rare or null genotypes

AAT < 11 mM, Emphysema on CT, FEV1:35–70%

Lung function, QoL, exacerbations, lung density

Reduction in loss of lung density measured by CT in treated patients(p = 0,03). No differences on FEV1 or DLCO. No differences in QoL

Meta-analysis

 Chapman el al, 2009 [70]

 

Meta-analysis of studies on treated patients vs controls form Canadian Registry (n = 1509)

FEV1 decline

Reduction of 26% on FEV1 decline (17,9 ml/Y) in patients on treatment with ev AAT. Effect due to subjects with FEV1: 30–65%

 Gotzsche and Johansen, 2010 [71]

60 mg/kg/7 days

Meta-analysis Cochrane from 2 RCT (n = 140)

FEV1 Decline

DLCO

Lung density

Exacerbations

Lower lung density loss in treated patients (p = 0.03)

No differences in lung function

No differences in exacerbations

 Stockley et al., 2010 [69]

60 mg/kg/7 days

Integrated analysis of lung density studies

Lung density loss

FEV1 decline

Lower lung density loss in treated patients (1.73 vs 2.74 g/L, p = 0.006)

No differences in FEV1 decline

Marciniuk et al., 2012 [63]

 

Meta-analysis of all studies including treated patients with ev AAT vs controls

All parameters

Reduction in lung density loss measured by CT.

Reduction on mortality

Studies on exacerbations

 Lieberman, 2000 [73]

55% weekly

37% biweekly

8% monthly

Observational

(online survey)

n = 89

Exacerbations frequency

Reduction on exacerbations frequency from 3 to 5/year to 0–1/year on treatment with ev AAT

 Stockley et al., 2002 [74]

60mgs/kg/7 days

Descriptive

(n = 12)

Inflammatory biomarkers in sputum

Reduction of LTB4 after treatment

 Barros-Tizón et al., 2012 [75]

180 mg/kg/21 days

Retrospective (pre-post AAT treatment)

Frequency and severity of exacerbations

Reduction on number and severity of exacerbations and hospital admissions related costs

Adapted from Casas F et al. Arch Bronconeumol 2015; 51:185–192 (ref. [38])

Early studies had FEV1 decline and mortality as the principal endpoint [62, 7072] and they evidenced a reduction in FEV1 decline in the treated group. Larger observational studies showed that treatment with AAT augmentation therapy resulted in a slower decline in FEV1 and a reduction in mortality compared to those not receiving this treatment [70, 73, 74]. However, even though augmentation therapy was beneficial, the reduction in lung function loss was observed mainly for patients with a FEV1 between 35 and 60%, so this treatment was only recommended in patients that fall within this lung function-impairment range [39, 62]. Recently, other medical societies have proposed different criteria [38, 75].

One of the earlier randomised placebo-controlled trials studied the change in pulmonary function tests and lung density measured by CT, but only 30 patients were included and the study showed no difference in the pulmonary function tests. However, compared to the placebo group the change in lung density tended to improve (p < 0.07). The study showed that decline in FEV1 is not the appropriate method to assess the efficacy of augmentation therapy due to the large number of patients required [76]. Since then, the use of other markers such as DLCO or lung density measured by computed tomography (CT) as alternative outcome metrics to FEV1 have been studied. More recent studies have reported that a decline in DLCO is observed before FEV1 decreases [77], and that both DLCO and lung density (as measured by CT) demonstrate lung parenchyma loss, even in severe disease where FEV1 may be stable [78]. Moreover, lung density assessed by CT also correlates with health-related quality of life (HRQL) and is the best predictor of mortality in AATD patients [79]. The EXACTLE randomised controlled trial [80] also evaluated changes in CT lung density in patients receiving AAT augmentation therapy versus placebo: the results were similar to the previous study and, although the differences were not significant, therapy also demonstrated a trend to improve lung density (p = 0.068). Data from these two clinical trials were pooled to increase the statistical power [81] showing a significant improvement in lung density decline (by 2.297 g/L in the treatment group) over two years in treated versus untreated patients (p = 0.006).

Whereas in some countries these data were sufficient for AAT augmentation treatment to become a registered treatment, others reject registration and reimbursement because of the lack of larger randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Indeed, despite several meta-analyses supporting the use of augmentation therapy [75, 81, 82] an unfavourable Cochrane review based on the rate of FEV1 decline [83] as well as the lack of consensus encouraged the search for new evidence. The RAPID trial gave additional information for the efficacy of augmentation therapy. This trial included 180 patients with emphysema secondary to AATD and a FEV1 of 35–70% (predicted), recruited in 28 centres in 13 countries [84]. The patients were randomised into augmentation therapy or placebo and followed for two years by CT densitometry. There was an additional extension in which all the patients received active treatment and were followed for an additional two years (RAPID-OLE) [85]. Primary endpoints in RAPID trial were CT lung density at total lung capacity (TLC) and at functional residual capacity (FRC) combined, and the two separately. Although the primary endpoint of lung density at TLC and FRC combined did not reach the statistical significance (p = 0.06), changes in CT lung density at TLC alone (another primary endpoint) showed a significant difference in the rate of lung parenchymal loss between patients who received augmentation therapy and those who received placebo (− 1.45 g/L per year versus − 2.19 g/L per year; p = 0.03), with an absolute difference of 0.75 g/L per year (95% CI: 0.06–1.42), corresponding to a relative reduction of 34% in favour of augmentation therapy. These results showed that augmentation therapy was effective in reducing annual lung tissue loss. Which was demonstrated by a statistically significant reduction of lung density loss measured at a total lung capacity (TLC) of 34% (p = 0.03). Moreover, patients who were initially in the placebo arm and agreed to participate in the extend study and subsequently received active treatment for the next two years, showed a reduction in their lung density decline rate similar to that of patients initially included in the active arm of the study [85].

Some studies have showed a reduction on exacerbation frequency and severity [8688] in AATD patients under augmentation therapy (Table 1). However, some inconsistencies have been observed in the results obtained from these clinical trials indicating that further research is needed to clarify this point [31].

Ongoing research and future treatments

Epigenetics and genetic modifiers

AATD symptoms and outcomes vary greatly, indicating that beyond the protease-antiprotease imbalance other genetic, epigenetic, and environmental and lifestyle factors may contribute to disease severity. Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression not caused by DNA sequence changes. At the molecular level, three distinct but interconnected systems including DNA methylation, histone modification leading to chromatin remodelling, and non-coding RNAs are involved in epigenetic gene expression regulation. Understanding the mechanisms that are involved in the initiation, maintenance, and hereditability of the epigenetic changes observed in AATD is an important aspect of current research in this field [89].

DNA methylation is by far the best-studied form of epigenetic change. In one study, changes in the global DNA methylation pattern and systemic inflammation markers caused by cigarette smoke were analysed in 316 PiZZ AATD patients. The methylation levels of 16 CpG sites were significantly associated with an ever-smoking status, with all 16 being hypomethylated in this subset compared with never-smokers. However, after adjusting for age and sex, only one CpG site, in the transforming growth factor, β-induced (TGFB1) gene, was associated with ever-smoking. The same study found an association between C-reactive protein levels and changes in CpG sites in the runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3), Janus kinase 3 (JAK3), and keratin-1 (KRT1) genes. Taken together, these results indicate that ever-smoking and age at smoking initiation is associated with both global and specific gene hypomethylation, and suggest that DNA methylation might be important in explaining disease heterogeneity [90]. Similarly, DNA methylation was associated with both the presence and severity of COPD in two family-based cohorts comprising 1.085 and 369 subjects, respectively. Although none of the subjects included in the studies were PIZZ a hypomethylation of the SERPINA1 gene at loci cg02181506 was associated with COPD and with poor lung-function phenotypes [91]. Additionally, the methylation patterns and AAT gene expression were studied in two series of somatic cell hybrids between a rat hepatoma line and human fetal liver fibroblasts or human skin fibroblasts. The results indicate a clear correlation of hypomethylation with increased AAT gene expression, while inactive AAT genes were highly methylated. Nevertheless, the functional meaning of this change is currently unknown in humans [92]. Altogether, these studies show a link between changes in the DNA methylation pattern and phenotype and severity of AATD.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding, single-stranded RNA molecules which act at the post-transcriptional level and play key roles in regulating gene expression. So far, the role of miRNAs in AATD has been very little studied. miRNA expression and function were analysed in monocytes isolated from both symptomatic and asymptomatic PiMM and PiZZ individuals. The authors described a group of 43 differentially expressed miRNAs and showed that miR-199a-5p may be an important regulator of both unfolded protein response and inflammation in AATD. These investigators showed that miR-199a-5p is the most up-regulated miRNA in asymptomatic PiZZ vs. PiMM monocytes, but conversely, miR-119a-5p expression was decreased in symptomatic PiZZ patients, a process mediated by hypermethylation of the miR-119a-2 promoter [93, 94]. In a recent study, gene and miRNA expression were analysed in PBMCs of a small group of PIZZ-AATD patients with severe (n = 6) and mild (n = 6) COPD. The authors identified that patients with severe COPD–AATD disease presented 205 differentially expressed mRNAs (114 upregulated and 91 downregulated) and 28 miRNAs (20 upregulated and 8 downregulated) compared to patients with mild disease. Of these down-regulated miRNAs in severe emphysema patients, miR-486 and miR-335 have previously been related to respiratory diseases. Downregulation of miR-335 involves the activation of pathways related to inflammation and angiogenesis. Therefore, these results suggest a correlation between decreased miR-335 expression and severity of AATD-related emphysema. However, this finding must be confirmed in large studies including a control group of patients with non- AATD–related COPD. [95]. Overall, these studies provide additional information on the role of miRNA in AATD, which is related to the development and progression of the disease.

As previously mentioned, AATD is caused by mutations in the AAT gene leading to protein misfolding. Proper protein folding is carried out by a complex network of proteins and pathways called the proteostasis network, a process regulated by several signalling pathways including the oxidative stress (OS) and inflammatory signalling pathways and the acetylation proteostasis system. Histone acetyltransferase and deacetylases (HDACs) have been shown to play important roles in liver and lung physiology by modifying the acetylation–deacetylation equilibrium, including in AATD. One report described correcting the Z form of AAT secretion in response to treatment with the HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) which restored Z-AAT secretion and serpin activity to 50% of wild-type AAT levels, thus suggesting that SAHA may be a potential treatment for AATD [96].

Several studies have shown that OS may be involved in the pathogenesis of AATD. Recent studies by our research group have shown that OS produced by a reduction of antioxidant defences is involved in the pathophysiology of AATD at early ages, before relevant clinical manifestations have occurred, and is associated with a higher risk of developing lung and/or liver disease [97]. Further studies demonstrated that increased OS leads to telomere attrition in AATD patients and an association between telomere length and AAT phenotypes, suggesting that telomere length could be a promising biomarker for AATD disease progression [98]. In a mouse model, exposure to cigarette smoke accelerates polymerisation of Z-AAT by oxidative modification of the AAT protein and enhances the neutrophil influx into the lungs [99]. Another study using Hepa1.6 cells has shown that disulphide interactions enhance intracellular accumulation of AAT, while treatment of cells with reducing agents increase Z-AAT secretion [100]. Altogether, these studies link redox states with polymerisation and intracellular retention of AAT, suggesting that redox state is a modifier factor for AATD and that targeting OS may be a promising therapeutic option for these patients [101, 102].

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) [103], glutathione s-transferase p1 (GSTP1) [104, 105], tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) [106], interleukin 10 (IL10) [107], microsomal epoxy hydrolase (mEH) [105], cholinergic nicotine receptor alpha3 (CHRNA3), and iron regulatory binding protein 2 (IREB2) [108] genes have all been shown to influence COPD development in AATD patients [108].

Biomarkers

Biomarkers which can act as an indicator of normal lung or liver physiology, disease progression, or response to AAT augmentation therapy, are being evaluated in the AATD field [109]. Serum gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) is used in clinical practice as a marker of liver disease. It is transiently elevated in PIZ children although it is a bad predictor of future liver problems in AATD patients [97, 98, 110]. Recent research has shown that serum GGT is independently associated to the severity of lung disease and respiratory mortality suggesting that might be a novel marker for respiratory disease in AATD patients [111].

Desmosine and isodesmosine are well-studied lung elastin degradation biomarkers which appear alongside the development of COPD. Preliminary studies showed that desmosine and isodesmosine levels in biofluids (plasma, urine, and sputum) from COPD patients with or without AATD are increased [112, 113]; one study also showed evidence that AAT augmentation therapy diminished desmosine excretion in AATD patients [114].

Circulating polymers can be used to diagnose AATD and are being investigated as prognostic biomarkers of the disease. Current data indicate that they may be involved in lung function decline in AATD patients. However, further studies to establish the stability of circulating polymers and its value as prognostic biomarkers are needed [115].

Fibrinogen has been recognised as a COPD biomarker [116]. Fibrinogen levels are related to the presence and frequency of exacerbations, disease severity and mortality in COPD patients [117]. Similarly, a specific blood fibrinogen (Aa-Val360) degradation product is increased in AATD patients, indicating airflow obstruction severity, and decreases in subjects receiving AAT augmentation therapy [118]. Results so far indicate that it may be a useful disease activity marker in patients with early disease in whom therapeutic intervention may be indicated [119].

Beyond their role as regulatory molecules, miRNAs are also being investigated as disease biomarkers in several lung [120] and liver pathologies [121]. In a preliminary study, plasma miRNA profile analysis in AATD individuals revealed a genetic signature that discriminate between the different AATD risk groups [122].

Emerging therapeutic strategies

AAT augmentation therapy requires regular intravenous infusion of plasma-purified AAT, which is costly and dependent on the availability of the protein. Therefore, alternative strategies are currently being investigated, including new delivery strategies, the use of gene therapy or iPSCs, non-augmentation strategies to prevent AAT polymerisation inside hepatocytes, the use of autophagy-enhancing drugs and silencing RNA strategies [123, 124].

Aerosol delivery is being investigated as an alternative, more effective method to deliver AAT to the lung. Early studies in humans have shown biochemical efficacy and safety, although larger clinical trials are needed [125].

Replacement strategies using gene therapy in animal models using viral [126] and non-viral gene [127, 128] transfer methods were first reported years ago, but this strategy would only be useful for treating emphysema because it cannot be used to treat liver disease. However, two recent studies using transgenic mouse AATD models have shown that Z gene expression can be knocked out while inserting the gene encoding wild type (WT) AAT. High therapeutic levels of human AAT and a simultaneous and significant reduction in the hepatic accumulation of Z protein were observed, although the reduction was not sufficient to prevent liver fibrosis [129, 130]. The recent advent of efficient genome editing based on zinc-finger nucleases, TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas9 system has opened up new strategies for definitive gene correction of the Z-AAT mutation in hepatocytes, which are currently under investigation. These techniques are based on chimeric endonucleases targeted to a specific site within the genome, where a double strand break (DSB) is provoked. The DSB can be repaired either by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or by homology directed repair (HDR) mechanisms. In the NHEJ pathway, the break ends are ligated without the need for a homologous DNA donor template leading most of the times to gene inactivation. In contrast, HDR is based on homologous recombination mechanisms and requires a foreign DNA donor template with sufficient homology to the genome on both sides of the region to be modified to guide gene edition. These homologous sequences can recombine into the chromosome, replacing the endogenous sequence with the new DNA so that the desired genomic alteration (replacement, insertion or deletion) can be achieved. This way, small insertions or deletions -if NHEJ occurs- or specific changes -if HDR occurs- can be introduced on the genomic sequence of interest (Figs. 2 & 3) [131, 132]. However, before these techniques can be used in clinical settings some key questions must be resolved. Some aspects, such as targeted delivery to hepatocytes and optimisation of gene editing efficiencies to achieve physiological effects, need further investigation. Another important aspect to be resolved is the prevention of the recent reported off-targeted mutagenesis [133]. However, new methods to improve gene editing specificity are under study and have already yielded promising results [134, 135].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Genome editing with engineered nucleases. Genome editing involves two steps: i) a nuclease is engineered to cleave a specific (target) sequence in the DNA creating a double strand break (DSB); ii) the cell’s ability to repair the DSB by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) causes a deletion in the target gene that can result in gene mutation or complete knockout whereas homology-directed repair (HDR) by homologous recombination using a homologous DNA template results in gene correction or insertion depending on the DNA donor structure. There are three main classes of engineered nucleases. a Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) consist of a DNA-binding macro-domain designed to target the sequence of interest that is composed of several zinc-fingers each one recognising three nucleotides in the target sequence and linked to the nuclease domain of the FokI restriction enzyme. After dimerisation of two ZFNs in inverse orientation and with an optimal spacing of 5–7 nucleotides, the dimeric FokI cleaves the DNA between the binding sites. b Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) have a similar structure to that of ZFNs. The TALEN DNA-binding macro-domain is composed of a tandem array of 34 aminoacids each recognising a single nucleotide. Similarly to ZFNs, TALENs also depend on FoKI activity and dimerisation to create a DSB between the binding sites. c In the CRISPR-Cas9 system, a site-specific DNA cleavage is performed by nuclease Cas9 directed by complementary between an engineered single guide RNA (gRNA) and the target sequence

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Strategies for delivery of engineered nucleases. a Cell-based (ex-vivo) approach. The therapeutic engineered nucleases are packaged into a delivery vehicle (virus, liposomes, naked-DNA, etc). Cells from patient carrying the mutated non-functioning gene are isolated and transfected with engineered nucleases to correct the mutated gene. Modified “healthy” cells are expanded in vitro and test for safety and off-target effects before being re-administered to the patient. b Direct-delivery (in vivo) approach. In that case, the therapeutic engineered nucleases are packaged into a delivery vehicle (virus, liposomes, naked-DNA, etc) and injected directly into the patient

An alternative approach is to take advantage of the higher proliferative capacity of WT-AAT hepatocytes over their PiZZ counterparts; using a PiZZ mouse model, Ding et al. demonstrated that WT hepatocytes can be transplanted to the diseased liver where they then substitute PiZZ hepatocytes [136]. Building on this finding, the AAT gene Z mutation has been corrected in hepatocyte-like cells derived from iPSCs, and these cells were then transplanted into a mouse liver to produce sustained levels of human AAT in vivo. However, this type of therapy also carries the risk of introducing potentially harmful point mutations, and the accumulation of epigenetic changes in these cells cannot be excluded, which for now precludes the use of this technique in clinical practice at this stage of its development [137, 138].

Several strategies to prevent the polymerisation of mutated forms are also currently being studied. One peptide that targets a lateral hydrophobic area of the mutated AAT-Z protein was found to prevent polymerisation, although it increased intracellular degradation of the protein rather than inhibiting its secretion [123, 139, 140]. Similarly, reactive loop analogue peptides increase the secretion rate of the mutated forms but seem to increase their intracellular accumulation [140, 141].

Autophagy enhancement as a therapeutic alternative to liver transplantation has attracted a lot of interest recently. The autophagy-enhancing drugs carbamazepine and rapamycin stimulate intracellular degradation of misfolded Z-AAT and decrease hepatic fibrosis in a mouse model of AATD-associated liver disease [142, 143]. Carbamazepine is currently being tested in phase 2/3 pilot, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, clinical trial for severe liver disease attributable to AATD [144].

Another non-augmentation strategy involves the use of interference RNA (RNAi) to silence Z-AAT in hepatocytes. Preclinical data indicates that chronic silencing reduces inclusion body formation and hepatic damage in a mouse model of the disease [123].

Conclusions

In summary, AATD remains underdiagnosed. Therefore, new strategies to enhance detection are needed, especially because available evidence supports the clinical efficacy of augmentation therapy and promising new alternative therapies are currently being investigated that may change the panorama of treatment and disease over the next few years. In addition, relevant biomarkers are still needed to stratify patients to better predict disease progression rates or monitor response to treatment. The clinical utility of these biomarkers will increase as our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in emphysema moves forward.

Abbreviations

AAT: 

Alpha-1 antitrypsin

AATD: 

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency

ATS: 

American Thoracic Society

COPD: 

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

CT: 

Computed Tomography

DLCO: 

Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide

ERS: 

European Respiratory Society

FEV1: 

Flow Expiratory Volume in 1 s

GGT: 

Gamma Glutamyl Transferase

HDACs: 

Histone acetyltransferase and deacetylases

IPSCs: 

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

NE: 

Neutrophil elastase

SAHA: 

Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by SEPAR 201/2013 and ISCIII PI17/01250 grants and European Regional Development Funds.

Authors’ contributions

MTD; JLLC and BMD wrote the chapter on “Screening and clinical diagnosis, stratification and prognosis”. MB and MM wrote the chapter on “Augmentation therapy: advances and controversies”. SC and AE wrote the chapter on “Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a paediatricians’ perspective”. AB; FC and FD wrote the chapter on “Background”. MMNG; DP; LB and FD wrote the chapter on “Ongoing research and future treatments”. FD wrote the “Conclusions” and the “Abstract”. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Drs. María Torres-Durán, Silvia Castillo, Amparo Escribano, María Mercedes Navarro García, Daniel Pellicer, Lucía Bañuls, Francisco Casas and Francisco Dasí report no disclosures.

Dr. José Luis López-Campos reports personal fees and non-financial support from Grifols, during the conduct of the study.

Dr. Miriam Barrecheguren reports personal fees from Menarini, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Gebro pharme, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Grifols, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Miravitlles reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Teva, Grifols and Novartis, personal fees from Bayer Schering, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gebro Pharma, CLS Behring, Cipla, MediImmune, Mereo Biopharma, Teva, Novartis and Grifols, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Martinez-Delgado reports grants from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. ISCIII. (Spain), other from Registro Español de pacientes con Deficit de alfa-1 antitripsina (REDAAT). Fundación Española de Pulmón, during the conduct of the study.

Dr. Baloira reports personal fees and non-financial support from GRIFOLS during the conduct of the study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pulmonary Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro EOXI, Vigo, Spain
(2)
NeumoVigo I+i Research Group, IIS Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain
(3)
Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
(4)
CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
(5)
Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
(6)
Molecular Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Raras (IIER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
(7)
Fundación Investigación Hospital Clínico Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, c/Menéndez y Pelayo, 4, 46010 Valencia, Spain
(8)
School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
(9)
Pneumology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
(10)
School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Research group on Rare Respiratory Diseases (ERR), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
(11)
Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain

References

  1. Stoller JK, Aboussouan LS. A review of α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:246–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Stoller JK, Brantly M. The challenge of detecting alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. COPD. 2013;10(1):26–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Tan L, Dickens JA, Demeo DL, Miranda E, Perez J, Rashid ST, et al. Circulating polymers in α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:1501–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott PR, Stein PE, Bilton D, Carrell RW, Lomas DA. Structural explanation for the deficiency of S alpha 1-antitrypsin. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:910–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahadeva R, Chang WS, Dafforn TR, Oakley DJ, Foreman RC, Calvin J, et al. Heteropolymerization of S, I, and Z alpha1-antitrypsin and liver cirrhosis. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:999–1006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lomas DA. Twenty years of polymers: a personal perspective on alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. COPD. 2013;10(1):17–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brebner JA, Stockley R. Recent advances in α-1-antitrypsin deficiency-related lung disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013;7:213–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. de Serres F, Blanco I. Role of alpha-1 antitrypsin in human health and disease. J Intern Med. 2014;276:311–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanco I, Bueno P, Diego I, Pérez-Holanda S, Lara B, Casas-Maldonado F, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin pi*SZ genotype: estimated prevalence and number of SZ subjects worldwide. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:1683–94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hadzik-Blaszczyk M, Zdral A, Zielonka TM, Rozy A, Krupa R, Falkowski A, et al. SERPINA1 gene variants in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;116:253–10.Google Scholar
  11. McCarthy C, Reeves EP, McElvaney NG. The role of neutrophils in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S297–304.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cosio MG, Bazzan E, Rigobello C, Tinè M, Turato G, Baraldo S, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: beyond the protease/antiprotease paradigm. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S305–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Janciauskiene S, Welte T. Well-known and less well-known functions of alpha-1 antitrypsin. Its role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other disease developments. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S280–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bergin DA, Hurley K, McElvaney NG, Reeves EP. Alpha-1 antitrypsin: a potent anti-inflammatory and potential novel therapeutic agent. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2012;60:81–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. de Serres FJ, Blanco I. Prevalence of α1-antitrypsin deficiency alleles PI*S and PI*Z worldwide and effective screening for each of the five phenotypic classes PI*MS, PI*MZ, PI*SS, PI*SZ, and PI*ZZ: a comprehensive review. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2012;6:277–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. de Serres FJ. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is not a rare disease but a disease that is rarely diagnosed. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1851–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Blanco I, Bueno P, Diego I, Pérez-Holanda S, Casas-Maldonado F, Esquinas C, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin pi*Z gene frequency and pi*ZZ genotype numbers worldwide: an update. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:561–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogarth DK, Rachelefsky G. Screening and familial testing of patients for alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 2008;133:981–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fregonese L, Stolk J. Hereditary alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency and its clinical consequences. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandhaus RA. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S370–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tonelli AR, Brantly ML. Augmentation therapy in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: advances and controversies. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4:289–312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Primhak RA, Tanner MS. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:2–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Eriksson S. Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Hepatol. 1999;30(1):34–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. de Serres FJ, Blanco I, Fernández-Bustillo E. Genetic epidemiology of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in North America and Australia/New Zealand: Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. Clin Genet. 2003;64:382–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Radlović N, Leković Z, Radlović V, Simić D, Topic A, Ristić D, et al. Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency in children: clinical characteristics and diagnosis. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2014;142:547–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Migliazza L, López Santamaría M, Murcia J, Gamez M, Clavijo J, Camarena C, et al. Long-term survival expectancy after liver transplantation in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:5–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Townsend SA, Edgar RG, Ellis PR, Kantas D, Newsome PN, Turner AM. Systematic review: the natural history of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and associated liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;111:1851.Google Scholar
  28. Sveger T. Liver disease in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency detected by screening of 200,000 infants. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:1316–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Teckman J, Pardee E, Howell RR, Mannino D, Sharp RR, Brantly M, et al. Appropriateness of newborn screening for α1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:199–203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sveger T. The natural history of liver disease in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficient children. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77:847–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Miravitlles M, Dirksen A, Ferrarotti I, Koblizek V, Lange P, Mahadeva R, et al. European Respiratory Society statement: diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary disease in α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700610.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandhaus RA, Turino G, Brantly ML, Campos M, Cross CE, Goodman K, et al. The diagnosis and management of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in the adult. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016;3:668–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martínez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report: GOLD executive summary. Arch Bronconeumol. 2017;53:128–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, et al. Spanish guidelines for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GesEPOC) 2017 Pharmacological treatment of stable phase. Arch Bronconeumol. 2017;53:324–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoller JK. Detecting alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S317–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Campos MA, Wanner A, Zhang G, Sandhaus RA. Trends in the diagnosis of symptomatic patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency between 1968 and 2003. Chest. 2005;128:1179–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chorostowska-Wynimko J. Targeted screening programmes in COPD: how to identify individuals with α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24:40–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Casas F, Blanco I, Martínez MT, Bustamante A, Miravitlles M, Cadenas S, et al. Indications for active case searches and intravenous alpha-1 antitrypsin treatment for patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency chronic pulmonary obstructive disease: an update. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51:185–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society statement: standards for the diagnosis and management of individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:818–900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kueppers F, Sanders C. State-of-the-art testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017;38:108–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Thelin T, Sveger T, McNeil TF. Primary prevention in a high-risk group: smoking habits in adolescents with homozygous alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (ATD). Acta Paediatr. 1996;85:1207–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Tretter JT. Adding α-1 antitrypsin deficiency to the newborn screen. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:e37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Teckman J. Author's response. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:e38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Greulich T, Averyanov A, Borsa L, Rozborilová E, Vaicius D, Major T, et al. European screening for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency in subjects with lung disease. Clin Respir J. 2017;11:90–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Greulich T, Vogelmeier CF. Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: increasing awareness and improving diagnosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016;10:72–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. McElvaney NG. Diagnosing α1-antitrypsin deficiency: how to improve the current algorithm. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24:52–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Piras B, Ferrarotti I, Lara B, Martínez MT, Bustamante A, Ottaviani S, et al. Clinical phenotypes of Italian and Spanish patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:54–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Miravitlles M. What was the impact of the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC) and how can they be improved? Arch Bronconeumol. 2016;52:1–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Fernández-Villar A, Soriano JB, López-Campos JL. Overdiagnosis of COPD: precise definitions and proposals for improvement. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67:183–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Thabut G, Mornex J-F, Pison C, Cuvelier A, Balduyck M, Pujazon M-C, et al. Performance of the BODE index in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency-related COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:78–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Manca S, Rodríguez E, Huerta A, Torres M, Lázaro L, Curi S, et al. Usefulness of the CAT, LCOPD, EQ-5D and COPDSS scales in understanding the impact of lung disease in patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. COPD. 2014;11:480–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanash HA, Nilsson PM, Nilsson J-A, Piitulainen E. Survival in severe alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZZ). Respir Res. 2010;11:44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Stoller JK, Tomashefski J, Crystal RG, Arroliga A, Strange C, Killian DN, et al. Mortality in individuals with severe deficiency of alpha1-antitrypsin: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute registry. Chest. 2005;127:1196–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tanash HA, Nilsson PM, Nilsson J-A, Piitulainen E. Clinical course and prognosis of never-smokers with severe alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZZ). Thorax BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society. 2008;63:1091–5.Google Scholar
  55. Brantly M. Efficient and accurate approaches to the laboratory diagnosis of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: the promise of early diagnosis and intervention. Clin Chem. 2006;52:2180–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Molloy K, Hersh CP, Morris VB, Carroll TP, OConnor CA, Lasky-Su JA, et al. Clarification of the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in α1-antitrypsin deficiency PiMZ heterozygotes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:419–27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. O'Brien ME, Pennycooke K, Carroll TP, Shum J, Fee LT, O'Connor C, et al. The impact of smoke exposure on the clinical phenotype of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in Ireland: exploiting a national registry to understand a rare disease. COPD. 2015;12(1):2–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Mayer AS, Stoller JK, Vedal S, Ruttenber AJ, Strand M, Sandhaus RA, et al. Risk factors for symptom onset in PI*Z alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2006;1:485–92.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Piitulainen E, Tanash HA. The clinical profile of subjects included in the Swedish national register on individuals with severe alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. COPD. 2015;12(1):36–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Bernspång E, Wollmer P, Sveger T, Piitulainen E. Lung function in 30-year-old alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficient individuals. Respir Med. 2009;103:861–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Piitulainen E, Eriksson S. Decline in FEV1 related to smoking status in individuals with severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZZ). Eur Respir J. 1999;13:247–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. The Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry Study Group *. Survival and FEV1 decline in individuals with severe deficiency of alpha1-antitrypsin The alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency registry study group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:49–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Green CE, Vayalapra S, Hampson JA, Mukherjee D, Stockley RA, Turner AM. PiSZ alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD): pulmonary phenotype and prognosis relative to PiZZ AATD and PiMM COPD. Thorax. 2015;70:939–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Hersh CP, Dahl M, Ly NP, Berkey CS, Nordestgaard BG, Silverman EK. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in alpha1-antitrypsin PI MZ heterozygotes: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2004;59:843–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Silverman EK. Risk of lung disease in PI MZ heterozygotes. Current status and future research directions. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(Suppl 4):S341–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Sørheim I-C, Bakke P, Gulsvik A, Pillai SG, Johannessen A, Gaarder PI, et al. α1-antitrypsin protease inhibitor MZ heterozygosity is associated with airflow obstruction in two large cohorts. Chest. 2010;138:1125–32.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Carey EJ, Iyer VN, Nelson DR, Nguyen JH, Krowka MJ. Outcomes for recipients of liver transplantation for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency-related cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:1370–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Chu AS, Chopra KB, Perlmutter DH. Is severe progressive liver disease caused by alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency more common in children or adults? Liver Transpl. 2016;22:886–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Senior RM, Tegner H, Kuhn C, Ohlsson K, Starcher BC, Pierce JA. The induction of pulmonary emphysema with human leukocyte elastase. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977;116:469–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Seersholm N, Wencker M, Banik N, Viskum K, Dirksen A, Kok-Jensen A, et al. Does alpha1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy slow the annual decline in FEV1 in patients with severe hereditary alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency? Wissenschaftliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft zur Therapie von Lungenerkrankungen (WATL) alpha1-AT study Group. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2260–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Wencker M, Fuhrmann B, Banik N, Konietzko N. Wissenschaftliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft zur Therapie von Lungenerkrankungen. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with alpha(1)-protease inhibitor deficiency before and during therapy with IV alpha(1)-protease inhibitor. Chest. 2001;119:737–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Tonelli AR, Rouhani F, Li N, Schreck P, Brantly ML. Alpha-1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy in deficient individuals enrolled in the Alpha-1 Foundation DNA and tissue Bank. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:443–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Stockley RA, Miravitlles M, Vogelmeier C. Alpha one international registry (a.I.R.). Augmentation therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: towards a personalised approach. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:149.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Wewers MD, Casolaro MA, Sellers SE, Swayze SC, McPhaul KM, Wittes JT, et al. Replacement therapy for alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency associated with emphysema. N Engl J Med Massachusetts Medical Society. 1987;316:1055–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Marciniuk DD, Hernandez P, Balter M, Bourbeau J, Chapman KR, Ford GT, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency targeted testing and augmentation therapy: a Canadian thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Can Respir J. 2012;19:109–16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F, Stoel B, Hutchison DC, Ulrik CS, et al. A randomized clinical trial of alpha(1)-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1468–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Holme J, Stockley JA, Stockley RA. Age related development of respiratory abnormalities in non-index α-1 antitrypsin deficient studies. Respir Med. 2013;107:387–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Dawkins PA, Dawkins CL, Wood AM, Nightingale PG, Stockley JA, Stockley RA. Rate of progression of lung function impairment in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2009;33:1338–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Dowson LJ, Guest PJ, Hill SL, Holder RL, Stockley RA. High-resolution computed tomography scanning in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: relationship to lung function and health status. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:1097–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Dirksen A, Piitulainen E, Parr DG, Deng C, Wencker M, Shaker SB, et al. Exploring the role of CT densitometry: a randomised study of augmentation therapy in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2009;33:1345–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Stockley RA, Parr DG, Piitulainen E, Stolk J, Stoel BC, Dirksen A. Therapeutic efficacy of α-1 antitrypsin augmentation therapy on the loss of lung tissue: an integrated analysis of 2 randomised clinical trials using computed tomography densitometry. Respir Res. 2010;11:136.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Chapman KR, Stockley RA, Dawkins C, Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. Augmentation therapy for alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency: a meta-analysis. COPD. 2009;6:177–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Gøtzsche PC, Johansen HK. Intravenous alpha-1 antitrypsin augmentation therapy for treating patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and lung disease. In: Gøtzsche PC, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Chichester: Wiley; 2010. p. CD007851.Google Scholar
  84. Chapman KR, Burdon JGW, Piitulainen E, Sandhaus RA, Seersholm N, Stocks JM, et al. Intravenous augmentation treatment and lung density in severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency (RAPID): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:360–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. McElvaney NG, Burdon J, Holmes M, Glanville A, Wark PAB, Thompson PJ, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of α1 proteinase inhibitor treatment for emphysema caused by severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency: an open-label extension trial (RAPID-OLE). Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:51–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Lieberman J. Augmentation therapy reduces frequency of lung infections in antitrypsin deficiency: a new hypothesis with supporting data. Chest. 2000;118:1480–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Stockley RA, Bayley DL, Unsal I, Dowson LJ. The effect of augmentation therapy on bronchial inflammation in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1494–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Barros-Tizón JC, Torres ML, Blanco I, Martínez MT. Investigators of the rEXA study group. Reduction of severe exacerbations and hospitalization-derived costs in alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficient patients treated with alpha-1-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2012;6:67–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009;23:781–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Siedlinski M, Klanderman B, Sandhaus RA, Barker AF, Brantly ML, Eden E, et al. Association of cigarette smoking and CRP levels with DNA methylation in α-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Epigenetics. 2012;7:720–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Qiu W, Baccarelli A, Carey VJ, Boutaoui N, Bacherman H, Klanderman B, et al. Variable DNA methylation is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:373–81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Barton DE, Francke U. Activation of human alpha 1-antitrypsin genes in rat hepatoma x human fibroblast hybrid cell lines is correlated with demethylation. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1987;13:635–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Hassan T, Carroll TP, Buckley PG, Cummins R, ONeill SJ, McElvaney NG, et al. miR-199a-5p silencing regulates the unfolded protein response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:263–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Nana-Sinkam SP, Choi AMK. Epigenetics and the unfolded protein response in the lung: emerging role for microRNAs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:239–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Esquinas C, Janciauskiene S, Gonzalo R, Mas de Xaxars G, Olejnicka B, Belmonte I, et al. Gene and miRNA expression profiles in PBMCs from patients with severe and mild emphysema and PiZZ alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:3381–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Bouchecareilh M, Hutt DM, Szajner P, Flotte TR, Balch WE. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)-mediated correction of α1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Bio Chem. 2012;287:38265–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Escribano A, Amor M, Pastor S, Castillo S, Sanz F, Codoner-Franch P, et al. Decreased glutathione and low catalase activity contribute to oxidative stress in children with α-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Thorax. 2015;70:82–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Escribano A, Pastor S, Reula A, Castillo S, Vicente S, Sanz F, et al. Accelerated telomere attrition in children and teenagers with α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2016;48:350–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Alam S, Li Z, Janciauskiene S, Mahadeva R. Oxidation of Z α1-antitrypsin by cigarette smoke induces polymerization: a novel mechanism of early-onset emphysema. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45:261–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Ronzoni R, Berardelli R, Medicina D, Sitia R, Gooptu B, Fra AM. Aberrant disulphide bonding contributes to the ER retention of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency variants. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:642–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Pittschieler K. Vitamin E and liver damage in MZ heterozygous infants with alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Acta Paediatr. 1993;82:228–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Kode A, Rajendrasozhan S, Caito S, Yang S-R, Megson IL, Rahman I. Resveratrol induces glutathione synthesis by activation of Nrf2 and protects against cigarette smoke-mediated oxidative stress in human lung epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L478–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Novoradovsky A, Brantly ML, Waclawiw MA, Chaudhary PP, Ihara H, Qi L, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase as a potential susceptibility gene in the pathogenesis of emphysema in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;20:441–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Rodriguez F, la Roza de C, Jardi R, Schaper M, Vidal R, Miravitlles M. Glutathione S-transferase P1 and lung function in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency and COPD. Chest. 2005;127:1537–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Topic A, Nagorni-Obradovic L, Francuski D, Ljujic M, Malic Z, Radojkovic D. Oxidative stress and polymorphism of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in two patients with severe Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Biochem Genet. 2016;54(5):746–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Wood AM, Simmonds MJ, Bayley DL, Newby PR, Gough SC, Stockley RA. The TNFalpha gene relates to clinical phenotype in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Respir Res. 2008;9:52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Demeo DL, Campbell EJ, Barker AF, Brantly ML, Eden E, McElvaney NG, et al. IL10 polymorphisms are associated with airflow obstruction in severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;38:114–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Kim WJ, Wood AM, Barker AF, Brantly ML, Campbell EJ, Eden E, et al. Association of IREB2 and CHRNA3 polymorphisms with airflow obstruction in severe alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Respir Res. 2012;13:16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Turino GM, Ma S, Cantor JO, Lin YY. Biomarkers in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S336–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Piitulainen E, Carlson J, Ohlsson K, Sveger T. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency in 26-year-old subjects: lung, liver, and protease/protease inhibitor studies. Chest. 2005;128:2076–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Holme J, Dawkins PA, Stockley EK, Parr DG, Stockley RA. Studies of gamma-glutamyl transferase in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. COPD. 2010;7:126–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Ma S, Lin YY, Turino GM. Measurements of desmosine and isodesmosine by mass spectrometry in COPD. Chest. 2007;131:1363–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Luisetti M, Ma S, Iadarola P, Stone PJ, Viglio S, Casado B, et al. Desmosine as a biomarker of elastin degradation in COPD: current status and future directions. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1146–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Stone PJ, Morris TA, Franzblau C, Snider GL. Preliminary evidence that augmentation therapy diminishes degradation of cross-linked elastin in alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficient humans. Respiration. 1995;62:76–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Lomas DA. An ECLIPSE view of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S326–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Duvoix A, Dickens J, Haq I, Mannino D, Miller B, Tal-Singer R, et al. Blood fibrinogen as a biomarker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2013;68:670–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Mannino DM, Tal-Singer R, Lomas DA, Vestbo J, Graham Barr R, Tetzlaff K, et al. Plasma fibrinogen as a biomarker for mortality and hospitalized exacerbations in people with COPD. COPD. 2015;2:23–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Carter RI, Mumford RA, Treonze KM, Finke PE, Davies P, Si Q, et al. The fibrinogen cleavage product Aα-Val360, a specific marker of neutrophil elastase activity in vivo. Thorax. 2011;66:686–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Carter RI, Ungurs MJ, Pillai A, Mumford RA, Stockley RA. The relationship of the fibrinogen cleavage biomarker Aα-Val360 with disease severity and activity in α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 2015;148:382–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Rupani H, Sanchez-Elsner T, Howarth P. MicroRNAs and respiratory diseases. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:695–705.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhang Y-C, Xu Z, Zhang T-F, Wang Y-L. Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic tools for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9853–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Dasi F, Pastor S, Mata M, Amor M, Serna E, Castillo S, et al. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency patients. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:2038.Google Scholar
  123. Gooptu B, Dickens JA, Lomas DA. The molecular and cellular pathology of α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20:116–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Gruntman AM, Flotte TR. Therapeutics: gene therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1639:267–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Griese M, Scheuch G. Delivery of Alpha-1 antitrypsin to airways. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S346–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Chiuchiolo MJ, Crystal RG. Gene therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency lung disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):S352–69.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Dasí F, Benet M, Crespo J, Crespo A, Aliño SF. Asialofetuin liposome-mediated human alpha1-antitrypsin gene transfer in vivo results in stationary long-term gene expression. J Mol Med. 2001;79:205–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Aliño SF, Crespo A, Dasí F. Long-term therapeutic levels of human alpha-1 antitrypsin in plasma after hydrodynamic injection of nonviral DNA. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1672–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Li C, Xiao P, Gray SJ, Weinberg MS, Samulski RJ. Combination therapy utilizing shRNA knockdown and an optimized resistant transgene for rescue of diseases caused by misfolded proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:14258–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Mueller C, Tang Q, Gruntman A, Blomenkamp K, Teckman J, Song L, et al. Sustained miRNA-mediated knockdown of mutant AAT with simultaneous augmentation of wild-type AAT has minimal effect on global liver miRNA profiles. Mol Ther. 2012;20:590–600.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Alapati D, Morrisey EE. Gene editing and genetic lung disease. Basic research meets therapeutic application. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;56:283–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Barrangou R, May AP. Unraveling the potential of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:311–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Schaefer KA, Wu W-H, Colgan DF, Tsang SH, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods. 2017;14:547–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Tycko J, Myer VE, Hsu PD. Methods for ptimizing CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing specificity. Mol Cell. 2016;63:355–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y, Kweon J, Kim HS, Bae S, et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 2014;24:132–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Ding J, Yannam GR, Roy-Chowdhury N, Hidvegi T, Basma H, Rennard SI, et al. Spontaneous hepatic repopulation in transgenic mice expressing mutant human α1-antitrypsin by wild-type donor hepatocytes. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1930–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Rashid ST, Corbineau S, Hannan N, Marciniak SJ, Miranda E, Alexander G, et al. Modeling inherited metabolic disorders of the liver using human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3127–36.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Yusa K, Rashid ST, Strick-Marchand H, Varela I, Liu P-Q, Paschon DE, et al. Targeted gene correction of α1-antitrypsin deficiency in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;478:391–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Mallya M, Phillips RL, Saldanha SA, Gooptu B, Brown SCL, Termine DJ, et al. Small molecules block the polymerization of Z alpha1-antitrypsin and increase the clearance of intracellular aggregates. J Med Chem. 2007;50:5357–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Silverman GA, Pak SC, Perlmutter DH. Disorders of protein misfolding: alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency as prototype. J Pediatr. 2013;163:320–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Mahadeva R, Dafforn TR, Carrell RW, Lomas DA. 6-mer peptide selectively anneals to a pathogenic serpin conformation and blocks polymerization. Implications for the prevention of Z alpha(1)-antitrypsin-related cirrhosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6771–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Hidvegi T, Ewing M, Hale P, Dippold C, Beckett C, Kemp C, et al. An autophagy-enhancing drug promotes degradation of mutant alpha1-antitrypsin Z and reduces hepatic fibrosis. Science. 2010;329:229–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Kaushal S, Annamali M, Blomenkamp K, Rudnick D, Halloran D, Brunt EM, et al. Rapamycin reduces intrahepatic alpha-1-antitrypsin mutant Z protein polymers and liver injury in a mouse model. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235:700–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Perlmutter DH. Current and emerging treatments for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016;12:446–8.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement