Open Access

Large animal models of rare genetic disorders: sheep as phenotypically relevant models of human genetic disease

  • Ashish R. Pinnapureddy1,
  • Cherie Stayner1,
  • John McEwan2,
  • Olivia Baddeley3,
  • John Forman3 and
  • Michael R. Eccles1, 4Email author
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201510:107

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0327-5

Received: 12 June 2015

Accepted: 25 August 2015

Published: 2 September 2015

Abstract

Animals that accurately model human disease are invaluable in medical research, allowing a critical understanding of disease mechanisms, and the opportunity to evaluate the effect of therapeutic compounds in pre-clinical studies. Many types of animal models are used world-wide, with the most common being small laboratory animals, such as mice. However, rodents often do not faithfully replicate human disease, despite their predominant use in research. This discordancy is due in part to physiological differences, such as body size and longevity. In contrast, large animal models, including sheep, provide an alternative to mice for biomedical research due to their greater physiological parallels with humans. Completion of the full genome sequences of many species, and the advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies, means it is now feasible to screen large populations of domesticated animals for genetic variants that resemble human genetic diseases, and generate models that more accurately model rare human pathologies. In this review, we discuss the notion of using sheep as large animal models, and their advantages in modelling human genetic disease. We exemplify several existing naturally occurring ovine variants in genes that are orthologous to human disease genes, such as the Cln6 sheep model for Batten disease. These, and other sheep models, have contributed significantly to our understanding of the relevant human disease process, in addition to providing opportunities to trial new therapies in animals with similar body and organ size to humans. Therefore sheep are a significant species with respect to the modelling of rare genetic human disease, which we summarize in this review.

Keywords

Large animal modelgenetic diseasesheephuman genomeovine genomeDNA sequencing

Introduction

Based on the number of genes involved, genetic diseases can be categorised into simple monogenic diseases, which tend to be rare, or polygenic diseases, which are much more common and multifactorial in nature. However, the principal difference between rare monogenic and common diseases is their mode of inheritance; only monogenic diseases follow a typical Mendelian pattern of inheritance [1]. The identification of novel mutations causing genetic disease has seen more progress in the last few years than in the previous twenty. This increased body of research has resulted in a wealth of information regarding rare diseases and is publicly available through projects like the HapMap project [2] (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [3] (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim). Identifying the underlying cause of disease is the first step in developing an effective treatment, and it can take several years to decades for an effective treatment of any given pathological disorder to be available. Until recently, identifying the causative gene in a given disorder could be a very time consuming process. Now with the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, many large-scale genomic projects for the study of rare genetic diseases have come into effect. For instance, “The Undiagnosed Diseases Program” at National Institutes of Health (NIH), which started in May, 2008 [4], employed exome sequencing to screen patients who presented with previously undiagnosed genetic disorders and successfully diagnosed 39 patients in the first two years [4, 5].

Rare genetic diseases

Several challenges exist in the study of rare genetic disease. Most of the monogenic diseases of unknown genetic cause are present at a very low rate in the human population. Among the nearly seven thousand rare genetic diseases that are known in humans, there are disorders so rare that their condition is limited to just a small number of reported cases in the world, for example Ablepharon-Macrostomia syndrome [6]. Researchers face significant difficulties in identifying patients with a particular rare disease of interest and obtaining sufficient numbers of patients for analysis. In addition, the total amount of funding available for research focused on rare genetic disease is scarce. Nevertheless, orphan diseases cannot be ignored, as collectively they pose a heavy burden on society. Seventy five percent of rare diseases affect children, and 30 % of these children die within the first five years of life. In addition, studying rare monogenic diseases significantly contributes to our understanding of both monogenic and polygenic diseases [7].

Following a conference involving 30 rare genetic disease groups in New Zealand, the New Zealand Organization for Rare Disorders (NZORD) was established as a charitable trust in the year 2000, and now has a network of 165 rare disease support and information groups. Its main aims are to help people affected by rare diseases, to create awareness about rare diseases, promote improvements to health care and social supports, and facilitate research into rare diseases by networking with researchers, affected patients, clinicians and policy makers. Information regarding various rare diseases is also made available publicly through their website, which links to other rare disease organizations across the world. NZORD promotes rare disease research through their charitable company the New Zealand Institute for Rare Disease Research Ltd (NZIRDR). NZIRDR has recently started a human tissue biobank, is maintaining a register of researchers in New Zealand with an interest in rare disease research, and is actively investigating prevalence and costs of rare diseases in New Zealand. It also has a database of animal models of human diseases, which occur naturally in New Zealand’s farm animal populations, and is planning a significant step forward in their genomics research initiatives through an active search for more large animal models. A complete list of all the animal models is available at the NZIRDR animal models web page [8] (www.nzirdr.org.nz/animal_models/our_models).

Review: animal models and human disease

Many genes and their functions are highly conserved throughout the animal kingdom, and at the cellular level many biological processes are very similar between species, including cell proliferation, metabolism, and growth regulation. This homology across species is key to considering the possibility of studying diseases and their underlying molecular mechanisms in animal models of genetic disease. Indeed, animal models have been crucial in understanding both genetic diseases [9] and non-genetic diseases [10], alike. Furthermore, whole genome sequencing initiatives have now provided access to genome sequence information for approximately 60 species, including sheep and cattle, in addition to model organisms such as mice and zebrafish.

Animal models of human genetic disorders can provide excellent opportunities for pre-clinical studies to develop treatments for human disease. Choosing the appropriate animal model to address a biomedical research question is a complex process. Mice are very good models for biomedical studies, not least because of their short reproductive cycle, increasingly well-known genetics, ability to genetically manipulate embryos to create stable mouse lines, and small size [11]. Since the introduction of gene knockout technologies more than 25 years ago, thousands of gene knockout mouse models are now available. An ideal transgenic mouse model of human disease has a robust phenotype, well-defined abnormalities and pathological features that replicate the human disease well [11].

Examples of knockout mouse models of human disease include inherited neurodegenerative diseases, such as for example Huntington’s disease [12], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [13, 14], autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease [15], and skeletal diseases such as Stickler syndrome [16]. While mouse models of human genetic disease have contributed significantly to the understanding of various genetic diseases, several factors limit mice as models of human disease. For instance, there are no reported cases of naturally occurring PD in any animal species to the best of our knowledge. Most PD mouse models are toxin induced, where chemicals like1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), paraquat or rotenone are used to produce nigrostriatial dopaminergic lesions. Although most of the toxin-induced mouse models affect mitochondrial function and/or create free oxygen radicals, none of them completely reproduce the pathology and clinical symptoms of the PD seen in humans [13]. In spite of their extensive use to study the disease, the results obtained using these models have not so far been successfully translated to the clinic. Furthermore, neurodegenerative diseases like PD and Alzheimer’s disease occur in an elderly population, usually over 60 years of age, making the short life span of rodents a limiting factor. The complexity and genetic heterogeneity of diseases such as PD have a huge impact on whether mouse genetic models successfully model the human disease. Mutations in the gene Lrrk2 account for 5–6 % of patients with familial PD and 1–3 % of sporadic cases, but most Lrrk2 transgenic mouse models showed minimal or no neurodegeneration [14].

There are many factors that impact on the therapeutic leap from genetic models to humans and this has been extensively reviewed for Huntington’s disease [17]. The shortcomings of mouse models for Huntington’s disease can be extrapolated to other genetic diseases with a late onset. Recently, a study investigated the genetic similarities of humans with inflammatory disease with different etiologies and concluded that although the conditions in humans share a high similarity, the corresponding murine models correlate poorly to the human conditions [18]. This study further indicated that there is a need for readdressing the current animal models and raised concerns over the feasibility of translational medical research using simple mouse models [18]. A possible solution for this is therefore to employ multiple animal models.

Naturally occurring variants of human genetic diseases in animal counterparts

One of the most exciting land-marks in large animal research was marked by the successful cloning of the sheep named Dolly in 1996 [19]. This was a major leap forward in transgenic research and has led to the successful cloning of thousands of animals from 20 different species. There are many viable applications for this technology ranging from creating high-value farm animals, to producing transgenic animals or creating animal models for research.

Scientific awareness of the benefit of using large animal models in genetic research is increasing, as large animal models are more similar to humans in relation to size, lifespan, and certain clinical signs and physiology, than rodent models. They also have had a long history of use in medical research. Over the past few decades, large animal models, including sheep, have played important roles in preclinical trials [20], resulting in significant progress in the understanding of the pathological mechanisms of both complex and Mendelian genetic diseases. With the current lack of success in clinical trials, with less that 20 % proceeding past Phase II [21] the relevance of large animal models for pre-clinical work may become more apparent.

Progress in understanding genotype-phenotype relationships in human patients, has been facilitated by the study of animals with mutations in orthologous genes. Such animal orthologs are an important aid to the development of specific gene therapies for these disorders. There exist many animal models where naturally occurring disease-causing mutations that are homologous to mutations in the equivalent human disease have been discovered. Animal models that closely match the disease causing mutation in humans, like the Cln6 ovine model of Batten disease (BD) [22], can be particularly useful in determining the pathophysiology of disease, and for devising new therapeutic strategies for diseases. Human genetic diseases such as Sandhoff disease (a lipid storage disorder) have been spontaneously found in dogs [23, 24] cats [2528] and pigs [2931]. Among large animal models, dog and pig have been important model species [32, 33]. However, livestock models such as sheep may offer some advantages for developing new large animal models of genetic disease.

Sheep as a model of human genetic disease

Sheep are feasible large animal models for genetic studies for a number of reasons. Sheep are relatively outbred and much more human-like than mice, due to their similar size, and their closer genetic and physiological composition. In addition, because of this similarity sheep brains are similar in organization to non-human primates [34].

In New Zealand, sheep are ubiquitously farmed, domestic animals and therefore make cost-effective large animal models, with highly efficient agriculture systems already established. Their easy maintenance and acceptance of human handling saves both time and money. Sheep are also more socially acceptable animal models for research as compared to dogs. They are less expensive to purchase and manage than many closely related species such as cattle, particularly in New Zealand, which has a very large sheep population of approximately 30 million sheep. Using livestock such as sheep for medical research reflects the complexity of outbred populations [35].

In addition to cloning, large animal models for inherited diseases such as sheep can be established from naturally occurring variants. Sheep and cattle animal disease models frequently have mechanisms of disease similar to humans at both the molecular and morphological level [36]. There are strong founder effects in the various sheep breeds, well-established and recorded sheep studs, and well-documented phenotypic records. Regarding disease-causing mutations, the incidence of homozygous affected individuals is the square of the frequency of the disease allele. Therefore many deleterious recessive mutations may accumulate to a sizeable frequency, and yet homozygous affected animals may be infrequently seen in flocks, especially because maintenance of production values in stud flocks requires stringent culling, and affected or diseased lambs would generally not survive this. As a result, and because most sheep production systems in New Zealand utilize outbred animals, these homozygous animals may very seldom be seen on production farms. By tracing heterozygous carriers in stud flocks, it is relatively easy to find farms where a relatively high carrier frequency exists. These can be identified and a research flock established of carrier animals (for example, see polycystic kidney disease sheep below).

Sheep models for many inherited disorders already exist, such as those for inherited cataracts [37], achromatopsia [38], hemophilia [39, 40] and many others [8], and some have been successfully used in testing therapies for these diseases. A review in 2012, globally of sheep, cattle and goats, of traits for which causal gene variants were known [41] listed 14 autosomal recessive diseases analogous to diseases such as Batten disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, inherited rickets and Gaucher disease. Most of these mutations were Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). For example, a spontaneous animal model for McArdle disease has been identified in sheep [42] caused by a SNP. There are several well-established sheep models of genetic disease that have made a significant impact on our understanding of particular diseases. In the following paragraphs we present several naturally existing sheep models of human disease.

Sheep models of juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses [Batten disease, JNCL, Juvenile NCL, Spielmeyer-Vogt disease] (ORPHA79264)

The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) are a group of recessively inherited lethal neurodegenerative diseases. The disease in humans usually presents in previously normal children at around 5–10 years of age, with an incidence of 1 in 12500 live births [43]. Clinically, affected individuals are characterised by brain atrophy, vision loss due to retinopathy, seizures, and decline of mental and motor capacities, leading to premature death in the late teens or early adulthood. Accumulation of lysosome-derived storage bodies in neurons and in other cells types is a hallmark of this disease. Studies show that this disease is caused by mutations in at least 13 different genes, designated CLN1-CLN8, CLN10-CLN13, CLCN6 and SGSH [44]. A large number of naturally occurring animal models that have mutations in the CLN genes have been described (www.ucl.ac.uk/ncl)44 , including three sheep models. Mutations in CLN5 and CLN6 [9, 22, 34, 4548] have been identified in New Zealand and Australian sheep, and affected animals share close clinical and pathological characteristics with the human NCLs. Research in these flocks over the last 40 years has led to many advances in the understanding of Batten’s disease, such as the identification of the “lipofuscin-like” storage material, determining the regional nature of the cortical atrophy and its close association with neuroinflammation, and more recently the ability to trial therapeutic approaches using drug and gene therapies [34].

Jacob sheep, a Tay-Sachs disease model [GM2 gangliosidosis, B, B1 variant Hexosaminidase A deficiency] (ORPHA845)

GM2 gangliosidosis variant B, or Tay-Sachs disease (TSD), is marked by accumulation of G2 gangliosides due to hexosaminidase A deficiency. The incidence of the disease in non Ashkenazi Jewish populations is 1/360,000 and in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, the incidence of TSD is 1 in 3,600. TSD is a genetically heterogeneous rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease with aggregation of Gm2 ganglioside in the nerve cells of the central nervous system [49]. Clinical symptoms include developmental delay, visual inattention, and seizures, which result in a vegetative state by 2 years of age. This disease results in death at around 3 to 5 years of age in children, due to a disproportionately enlarged brain caused by neuronal storage of the ganglioside [49].

In 2011, a group of researchers published a report showing the results of biochemical and molecular genetic analyses of four Jacob lambs diagnosed with TSD. The lambs, which were from the same farm in Texas, were investigated by the Texas A&M University veterinary hospital over a three-year period [50]. Detailed physical and histological examinations of the brains have given important insights into this genetic disease. The sheep were categorized into infantile, late infantile, juvenile and adult onset forms. The infantile sheep exhibited progressive clinical signs similar to the milder condition of TSD in humans. However, histopathological findings from the brain showed a high level of similarity to the human TSD patients. In contrast, attempts to create a TSD mouse model by gene knockouts have not been entirely successful [51,52].

A sheep model of Gaucher disease [acid beta-glucosiase deficiency, glucocerebrosidase deficiency] (ORPHA355)

Gaucher disease (GD) is a lysosomal storage disorder encompassing three main forms (types 1, 2 and 3), a fetal form and a variant with cardiac involvement (Gaucher disease - ophthalmoplegia - cardiovascular calcification or Gaucher-like disease). The overall prevalence is approximately 1/100,000. Lysosomes play a major role in living cells with functions such as constitutive recycling and autophagy [53]. Although over 300 different disease-causing mutations have been described in humans for Gaucher disease (GD), the lysosomal storage disorders in general are still relatively poorly understood.

GD is an autosomal recessive disorder, and is the most common lysosomal storage disorder with a wide range of clinical presentations. Mutations in the gene encoding β-glucocerebrosidase cause this disease. The three sub-types of GD are characterized by neurologically related problems with symptoms ranging from cytopenia, to anemia to bone disease in the patients. Naturally occurring GD has been identified in animals such as mice [54, 55] and pigs [56]. Although a sheep model of GD had been described previously in the 1960’s [57], a more recent naturally occurring variant of GD in a Southdown flock of sheep was identified and described in Australia [53]. Further structural analysis showed that the gene was highly conserved between sheep and humans and shared a high structural similarity. Further investigations including biochemical and histopathological examinations showed that the affected neonatal lambs displayed severe clinical signs that were highly similar to the most severe and very rare form of this disease, GD type-2 [53]. Two mutations were identified following a mutational screening and further analysis showed that one of the two missense mutations caused the severe phenotype of this disease [58].

A sheep model of the recessive polycystic kidney disease, Meckel syndrome [Meckel-Gruber syndrome] (ORPHA564)

Meckel syndrome (MKS) is a rare, lethal, genetic disorder characterized by occipital encephalocele, large polycystic kidneys, and polydactyly as well as associated abnormalities that may include cleft lip/palate, cardiac and genital anomalies, central nervous system (CNS) malformations, liver fibrosis, and bone dysplasia. Incidence has been estimated as anywhere between 1 in 3000 to 1 in 140, 000, depending on the population studied [59].

Polycystic kidney diseases (PKD) are the most common inherited kidney disorders, in which many cysts form in the kidneys and other organs. The exact mechanism of how cyst formation in the kidney is triggered still remains to be understood [60]. In addition to the dominant form of PKD (ADPKD), there are many less common forms of PKD, including autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) with an incidence of approximately 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 40,000 live births, including MKS, which mainly affect children and infants.

Previously, we and colleagues have described a recessive form of PKD in two flocks of New Zealand sheep [61]. These two different breeds of sheep have been further characterized, and the recessive PKD in affected newborn lambs were found to have phenotypic characteristics similar to MKS, with a shared genetic abnormality in the 2 flocks (manuscript in preparation). Lambs with this disorder usually die perinatally, although we have observed that affected lambs are very occasionally born alive (Fig. 1). MKS is invariably fatal in the perinatal period [62].
Fig. 1

Photograph of an affected newborn lamb with a recessive polycystic kidney disease

The sheep genome

One of the driving forces behind the success of small animal models like mice and zebrafish is the availability of their completely sequenced genome. Therefore, a major advantage in the genetic characterization of domestic farm animals is to have completely characterized genomes. An international consortium has recently completed a fully annotated sequence of the sheep genome [63] which has been made available to the public on the University of California Santa Cruz website (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway). Furthermore, the availability of Ovine and bovine SNP chips has already impacted various commercial and academic research projects in Australia and New Zealand, and large amounts of data concerning single nucleotide variants in more than 55,000 sheep have already been generated. Using this SNP information together with current genomic technologies and methods, in silico identification of disease–causing mutations and embryonic lethal variants is possible. This, together with the vast amounts of phenotypic data that have already been collected by the NZ sheep industry, allows the possibility of systematic screening for the identification of putative disease-causing variants. Furthermore, the sheep industry in New Zealand has pedigree information on millions of animals, including those that have genotype information. Therefore there is infrastructure in the industry that can allow animals or flocks of animals harboring specific gene variants of interest to be easily identified and sourced in the population.

NGS and the identification of new sheep models of disease

Since its invention in the 1970’s by Frederick Sanger, DNA sequencing has promulgated a major revolution in genetic research. The human genome project, which began in 1990, took 13 years and cost $2.7 billion to completely sequence the first human genome. The information gained through the completion of this project has played an important role in studying various monogenic and complex polygenic diseases. With the advent of NGS technology, it now takes approximately 3 days to completely sequence a human genome and costs only a few thousand dollars. This has provided the ability to carry out experiments that were previously unfeasible, and indeed NGS techniques have revolutionised the way scientists approach solving complex genetic problems in many fields of genomic research including microbiology, oncology, genetics and virology [64]. Moreover, equivalent efforts have also been carried out by the NIH (USA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which has resulted in a completely characterized bovine genome sequence [65](http://bovinegenome.org/), and this therefore provides the opportunity for comparative genomic analysis between ovine, bovine and human.

The cost and time for NGS DNA sequencing has been lowered by orders of magnitude, and so it is now feasible to screen populations of sheep for genetic variants that resemble human genetic diseases. Indeed, this work is already well underway as part of production value surveys for variables associated with commercially important attributes, such as parasite resistance, growth rates and wool production, and with help from NZORD and collaborating organisations early-stage experiments have been started.

Conclusions and future directions

The use of a diverse range of animal models, covering all aspects of disease manifestations at both the genotypic and phenotypic level allows for greater insights into disease mechanisms. The identification of natural variants of genetic disease in sheep is a first step towards the possibility of successfully establishing new sheep models for human genetic diseases. Indeed, ovine models of genetic disease such as the GD model have shown their worth as excellent pre-clinical models. Clearly, NGS will continue to play a role in the characterization of spontaneous genetic diseases arising in sheep, and will help to generate new ovine models of human genetic disease. However, it is now feasible to screen populations of sheep for genetic variants that resemble human genetic diseases, and with an appropriate investment in sequencing and bioinformatics resources, one possible future direction could be to use this NGS approach as a way to search for, and via carrier-carrier crosses, generate new ovine models of human genetic disease. The adoption of this approach could potentially result in a many-fold expansion of the numbers of ovine models of human disease, which would then help to realize both human and animal therapeutic benefits.

Abbreviations

BD: 

Batten disease

GD: 

Gaucher disease

TSD: 

Tay-Sachs disease

NGS: 

Next generation sequencing

NIH: 

National Institutes of Health

NZORD: 

New Zealand Organization for Rare Disorders

NZIRDR: 

New Zealand Institute for Rare Disease Research

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

MPTP: 

1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine

NCL: 

neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

PKD: 

polycystic kidney disease

ARPKD: 

autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease

ADPKD: 

autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

CNS: 

central nervous system

SNP: 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their colleagues for involvement with the PKD ovine model project, including Drs Bob Jolly, Alasdair Johnstone, Rob Walker, Sue McGlashen, Keren Dittmer, Tony Poole, Anna Wiles, Mr Alastair McCallum, Ms Kim Parker and Mr Mike Jennings. Parts of this work were funded by the Otago Medical Research Foundation, and the Centre for Reproduction & Genomics, University of Otago.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago
(2)
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre
(3)
New Zealand Organisation for Rare Disorders
(4)
Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery

References

  1. Barnetche T, Gourraud PA, Cambon-Thomsen A. Strategies in analysis of the genetic component of multifactorial diseases; biostatistical aspects. Transpl Immunol. 2005;14:255–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Thorisson GA, Smith AV, Krishnan L, Stein LD. The International HapMap Project Web site. Genome Res. 2005;15:1592–3.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Baltimore MD). Online Mendelian Inheritance of Man, OMIM®. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim). Accessed 21 March 2014.
  4. Maxmen A. Exome sequencing deciphers rare diseases. Cell. 2011;144:635–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gahl WA, Markello TC, Toro C, Fajardo KF, Sincan M, Gill F, et al. The national institutes of health undiagnosed diseases program: insights into rare diseases. Genet Med. 2012;14:51–9.Google Scholar
  6. Stevens CA, Sargent LA. Ablepharon-macrostomia syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2002;107:30–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonarakis SE, Beckmann JS. Mendelian disorders deserve more attention. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:277–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. New Zealand Institute for Rare Disease Research; animal models database. http://www.nzirdr.org.nz/animal_models/our_models. Accessed March 21, 2014.
  9. Frugier T, Mitchell NL, Tammen I, Houweling PJ, Arthur KG, Kay GW, et al. A new large animal model of CLN5 neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis in Borderdale sheep is caused by a nucleotide substitution at a consensus splice site (c.571 + 1G > A) leading to excision of exon 3. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;29:306–15.Google Scholar
  10. Zarrinkalam MR, Beard H, Schultz CG, Moore RJ. Validation of the sheep as a large animal model for the study of vertebral osteoporosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:244–53.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thyagarajan T, Totey S, Danton MJ, Kulkarni AB. Genetically altered mouse models: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:154–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beal MF, Ferrante RJ. Experimental therapeutics in transgenic mouse models of Huntington's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:373–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Seidl SE, Potashkin JA. The promise of neuroprotective agents in Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol. 2011;2:68.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Xu Q, Shenoy S, Li C. Mouse models for LRRK2 Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18 Suppl 1:S186–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson PD. Mouse models of polycystic kidney disease. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;84:311–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacenko O, Olsen BR. Transgenic mouse models in studies of skeletal disorders. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1995;43:39–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hersch SM, Ferrante RJ. Translating therapies for Huntington's disease from genetic animal models to clinical trials. NeuroRx. 2004;1:298–306.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, Mindrino MN, Baker HV, Xu W, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:3507–12.Google Scholar
  19. Wilmut I, Sullivan G, Taylor J. A decade of progress since the birth of Dolly. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2009;21:95–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rezapour M, Novara G, Meier PA, Holste J, Landgrebe S, Artibani W. A 3-month preclinical trial to assess the performance of a new TVT-like mesh (TVTx) in a sheep model. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:183–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Arrowsmith J, Miller P. Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011–2012. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tammen I, Houweling PJ, Frugier T, Mitchell NL, Kay GW, Cavanagh JA, et al. A missense mutation (c.184C > T) in ovine CLN6 causes neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis in Merino sheep whereas affected South Hampshire sheep have reduced levels of CLN6 mRNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1762:898–905.Google Scholar
  23. Cummings JF, Wood PA, Walkley SU, de Lahunta A, DeForest ME. GM2 gangliosidosis in a Japanese spaniel. Acta Neuropathol. 1985;67:247–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karbe E, Schiefer B. Familial amaurotic idiocy in male German shorthair pointers. Pathol Vet. 1967;4:223–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cork LC, Munnell JF, Lorenz MD. The pathology of feline GM2 gangliosidosis. Am J Pathol. 1978;90:723–34.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cork LC, Munnell JF, Lorenz MD, Murphy JV, Baker HJ, Rattazzi MC. GM2 ganglioside lysosomal storage disease in cats with beta-hexosaminidase deficiency. Science. 1977;196:1014–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hasegawa D, Yamato O, Kobayashi M, Fujita M, Nakamura S, Takahashi K, et al. Clinical and molecular analysis of GM2 gangliosidosis in two apparent littermate kittens of the Japanese domestic cat. J Feline Med Surg. 2007;9:232–7.Google Scholar
  28. Neuwelt EA, Johnson WG, Blank NK, Pagel MA, Maslen-McClure C, McClure MJ, et al. Characterization of a new model of GM2-gangliosidosis (Sandhoff's disease) in Korat cats. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:482–90.Google Scholar
  29. Kosanke SD, Pierce KR, Bay WW. Clinical and biochemical abnormalities in porcine GM2-gangliosidosis. Vet Pathol. 1978;15:685–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierce KR, Kosanke SD, Bay WW, Bridges CH. Animal model of human disease: GM2 gangliosidosis. Am J Pathol. 1976;83:419–22.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Read WK, Bridges CH. Cerebrospinal lipodystrophy in swine. A new disease model in comparative pathology. Pathol Vet. 1968;5:67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gun G, Kues WA. Current progress of genetically engineered pig models for biomedical research. Biores Open Access. 2014;3:255–64.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoenebeck JJ, Ostrander EA. Insights into morphology and disease from the dog genome project. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:535–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Palmer DN, Neverman NJ, Chen JZ, Chang CT, Houweling PJ, Barry LA, et al. Recent studies of ovine neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses from BARN, the Batten Animal Research Network. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015.Google Scholar
  35. Roth JA, Tuggle CK. Livestock models in translational medicine. ILAR J. 2015;56:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Agerholm JS. Inherited disorders in Danish cattle. APMIS Suppl. 2007;1–76.Google Scholar
  37. Morton JD, Lee HY, McDermott JD, Robertson JJ, Bickerstaffe R, Jones MA, et al. A macrocyclic calpain inhibitor slows the development of inherited cortical cataracts in a sheep model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:389–95.Google Scholar
  38. Banin E, Gootwine E, Obolensky A, Ezra-Elia R, Ejzenberg A, Zelinger L, et al. Gene Augmentation Therapy Restores Retinal Function and Visual Behavior in a Sheep Model of CNGA3 Achromatopsia. Mol Ther. 2015.Google Scholar
  39. Porada CD, Sanada C, Long CR, Wood JA, Desai J, Frederick N, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of a re-established line of sheep exhibiting hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:276–85.Google Scholar
  40. Porada CD, Sanada C, Kuo CJ, Colletti E, Mandeville W, Hasenau J, et al. Phenotypic correction of hemophilia A in sheep by postnatal intraperitoneal transplantation of FVIII-expressing MSC. Exp Hematol. 2011;39:1124–35. e4.Google Scholar
  41. Luhken G. Genetic testing for phenotype-causing variants in sheep and goats. Mol Cell Probes. 2012;26:231–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tan P, Allen JG, Wilton SD, Akkari PA, Huxtable CR, Laing NG. A splice-site mutation causing ovine McArdle's disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 1997;7:336–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rider JA, Rider DL. Batten disease: past, present, and future. Am J Med Genet. 1988;5:21–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology and London. UC NCL RESOURCE - A GATEWAY FOR BATTEN DISEASE NCL Mutation and Patient Database. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ncl/mutation.shtml. accessed August 2015.
  45. Jolly RD, Janmaat A, West DM, Morrison I. Ovine ceroid-lipofuscinosis: a model of Batten's disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1980;6:195–209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jolly RD, Palmer DN. The neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses (Batten disease): comparative aspects. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1995;21:50–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer DN, Tammen I, Drogemuller C, Johnson GS, Katz ML, Lingaas F. Large animal models in: SE Mole, RE Williams, HH Goebel (Eds) The Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses (Batten Disease), 2nd edition, Oxford University Press Inc, New York. 2011:pp. 284–320.Google Scholar
  48. Bond M, Holthaus SM, Tammen I, Tear G, Russell C. Use of model organisms for the study of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1832;2013:1842–65.Google Scholar
  49. Torres PA, Zeng BJ, Porter BF, Alroy J, Horak F, Horak J, et al. Tay-Sachs disease in Jacob sheep. Mol Genet Metab. 2010;101:357–63.Google Scholar
  50. Porter BF, Lewis BC, Edwards JF, Alroy J, Zeng BJ, Torres PA, et al. Pathology of G(M2) Gangliosidosis in Jacob Sheep. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:807–13.Google Scholar
  51. Kolodny EH, Brady RO, Volk BW. Demonstration of an alteration of ganglioside metabolism in Tay-Sachs disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969;37:526–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kolter T, Sandhoff K. Glycosphingolipid degradation and animal models of GM2-gangliosidoses. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1998;21:548–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Karageorgos L, Lancaster MJ, Nimmo JS, Hopwood JJ. Gaucher disease in sheep. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34:209–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Enquist IB, Nilsson E, Ooka A, Mansson JE, Olsson K, Ehinger M, et al. Effective cell and gene therapy in a murine model of Gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13819–24.Google Scholar
  55. Xu YH, Quinn B, Witte D, Grabowski GA. Viable mouse models of acid beta-glucosidase deficiency - The defect in Gaucher disease. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:2093–101.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sandison AT, Anderson LJ. Histiocytosis in 2 Pigs and a Cow - Conditions Resembling Lipid Storage Disorders in Man. J Pathol. 1970;100:207–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Laws L, Saal JR. Lipidosis of Hepatic Reticulo-Endothelial Cells in a Sheep. Aust Vet J. 1968;44:416–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Beutler E, Gelbart T, Scott CR. Hematologically important mutations: Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2005;35:355–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Logan CV, Abdel-Hamed Z, Johnson CA. Molecular genetics and pathogenic mechanisms for the severe ciliopathies: insights into neurodevelopment and pathogenesis of neural tube defects. Mol Neurobiol. 2011;43:12–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang XF, Li M, Qian Q, Harris PC, Torres VE. Effects of amiloride in two animal models of polycystic kidney disease (PKD). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:509A-A.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Johnstone AC, Davidson BI, Roe AR, Eccles MR, Jolly RD. Congenital polycystic kidney disease in lambs. N Z Vet J. 2005;53:307–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Gunay-Aygun M, Parisi MA, Doherty D, Tuchman M, Tsilou E, Kleiner DE, et al. MKS3-Related Ciliopathy with Features of Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease, Nephronophthisis, and Joubert Syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;155:386–92.Google Scholar
  63. Jiang Y, Xie M, Chen W, Talbot R, Maddox JF, Faraut T, et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science. 2014;344:1168–73.Google Scholar
  64. Barzon L, Lavezzo E, Militello V, Toppo S, Palu G. Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies to Diagnostic Virology. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12:7861–84.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Childers CP, Reese JT, Sundaram JP, Vile DC, Dickens CM, Childs KL, et al. Bovine Genome Database: integrated tools for genome annotation and discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D830-4.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Pinnapureddy et al. 2015

Advertisement