Open Access

Malignant hyperthermia: a review

  • Henry Rosenberg1,
  • Neil Pollock2,
  • Anja Schiemann3,
  • Terasa Bulger2 and
  • Kathryn Stowell3Email author
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases201510:93

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0310-1

Received: 24 May 2015

Accepted: 22 July 2015

Published: 4 August 2015

Abstract

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a pharmacogenetic disorder of skeletal muscle that presents as a hypermetabolic response to potent volatile anesthetic gases such as halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane and the depolarizing muscle relaxant succinylcholine, and rarely, in humans, to stressors such as vigorous exercise and heat. The incidence of MH reactions ranges from 1:10,000 to 1: 250,000 anesthetics. However, the prevalence of the genetic abnormalities may be as great as one in 400 individuals. MH affects humans, certain pig breeds, dogs and horses. The classic signs of MH include hyperthermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, increased carbon dioxide production, increased oxygen consumption, acidosis, hyperkalaemia, muscle rigidity, and rhabdomyolysis, all related to a hypermetabolic response. The syndrome is likely to be fatal if untreated. An increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide despite increased minute ventilation provides an early diagnostic clue. In humans the syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, while in pigs it is autosomal recessive. Uncontrolled rise of myoplasmic calcium, which activates biochemical processes related to muscle activation leads to the pathophysiologic changes. In most cases, the syndrome is caused by a defect in the ryanodine receptor. Over 400 variants have been identified in the RYR1 gene located on chromosome 19q13.1, and at least 34 are causal for MH. Less than 1 % of variants have been found in CACNA1S but not all of these are causal. Diagnostic testing involves the in vitro contracture response of biopsied muscle to halothane, caffeine, and in some centres ryanodine and 4-chloro-m-cresol. Elucidation of the genetic changes has led to the introduction of DNA testing for susceptibility to MH. Dantrolene sodium is a specific antagonist and should be available wherever general anesthesia is administered. Increased understanding of the clinical manifestation and pathophysiology of the syndrome, has lead to the mortality decreasing from 80 % thirty years ago to <5 % in 2006.

Keywords

Malignant Hyperthermia Anesthesia Ryanodine receptor

Introduction

This review summarizes current diagnostic, management and treatment practices for the rare genetic disorder malignant hyperthermia in the context of the current understanding of the structure and function of the skeletal muscle calcium channel. This review is intended for a general audience with an interest in malignant hyperthermia from a clinical or biomedical perspective. The most common form of malignant hyperthermia can be triggered by volatile anesthetic agents and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Other relevant disorders and complications are also discussed. Of particular note are the recent advances in DNA based diagnosis with the advent of accessible genome sequence analysis. Problems associated with the widespread use of DNA-based diagnosis are highlighted. Finally, a section on unresolved issues highlights the complexity of malignant hyperthermia, the underlying genetics and the potential crosstalk with related disorders of calcium handling in skeletal muscle.

Review

Disease name and synonyms

Malignant hyperthermia

Malignant hyperpyrexia

Hyperthermia of anesthesia

ORPHA423

Definition

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a pharmacogenetic disorder that manifests as a hypermetabolic response to potent inhalation agents (such as halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane), the depolarizing muscle relaxant succinylcholine, and rarely, in humans, to stressors such as vigorous exercise and heat. The two genes that have been definitively associated with MH causative mutations are RYR1 and CACNA1S, which will be discussed later.

As almost all patients who are MH susceptible have no phenotypic changes without anesthesia, it is impossible to diagnose susceptibility without either exposure to the “trigger” anesthetics or by specific diagnostic testing. The key clinical features include an unexplained elevation of expired carbon dioxide, despite increased minute ventilation, muscle rigidity and rhabdomyolysis, hyperthermia, tachcardia, acidosis and hyperkalemia. The majority of patients with Central Core Disease (CCD), an inherited myopathy characterized by muscle weakness, are susceptible to MH. Multi-minicore Disease (MmD), central nuclear myopathy and King-Denborough syndrome also predispose to episodes of MH.

Epidemiology

The incidence of MH episodes during anesthesia is between 1:10,000 and 1:250,000 anesthetics [1, 2]. Even though an MH crisis may develop at first exposure to anesthesia with those agents known to trigger an MH episode, on average, patients require three anesthetics before triggering. Reactions develop more frequently in males than females (2:1) [3, 4]. All ethnic groups are affected, in all parts of the world. The highest incidence is in young people, with a mean age of all patients experiencing reactions of 18.3 years. It has been found that children under 15 years age comprised 52.1 % of all reactions [5]. Although described in the newborn, the earliest reaction confirmed by testing is six months of age [6]. The oldest is 78 years.

The estimated prevalence of genetic abnormalities associated with MH susceptibility may be as great as one in 3000 individuals (range 1:3000 to 1:8500), with a more recent estimate being 1 in 400 [7].

Mauritz et al. [8] found an incidence of 1:37,500 in patients who had been diagnostically tested, which was similar to the incidence estimated by Robinson et al. (1:30,000) [9] although wide variability has been reported. A recent report suggested that the MH susceptible (MHS) trait may be present in 1:2000–3000 of the French population [10]. A similar incidence was reported for the Japanese population [11]. Bachand and colleagues traced the pedigrees of MH patients in Quebec, Canada to the original immigrants from France and found an incidence of MH susceptibility of 0.2 % in this province. However, that represented only five extended families. Similarly 1/200 patients presenting for anesthesia in the Manawatu region of New Zealand are either susceptible or related to MHS individuals (unpublished data – N Pollock, T Bulger).

A study of 12 million hospital discharges in the state of New York demonstrated the prevalence of MH to be one in 100,000 surgical procedures although the type of anesthetic was not indicated. This likely represents an underestimate of MH in association with general anesthesia [4].

MH crises develop not only in humans but also in other species, particularly pigs, which have been a valuable source for research. Reactions have also been described in horses, dogs and other animals [12].

Clinical description

MH may occur at any time during anesthesia as well as in the early postoperative period, but not after an hour of discontinuation of volatile agents [13]. The earliest signs are tachycardia, rise in end-expired carbon dioxide concentration despite increased minute ventilation, accompanied by muscle rigidity, especially following succinylcholine administration. Body temperature elevation can be a dramatic sign of MH. Larach et al. found that increased temperature was the first to third earliest sign in 63.5 % of MH reactions [14]. This confirms Sessler’s comment that core temperature should be monitored in most patients undergoing general anesthesia for periods lasting more than 30 min and in all patients with anesthesia lasting 60 mins [15].

Although end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) is a sensitive early sign of MH [16], in recent years, with a decline in the use of succinylcholine, rather than an abrupt rise in CO2, a more gradual rise is often noted. Indeed, by increasing minute ventilation it is possible to mask this rise [17].

Hyperthermia can be marked, with an increase in core temperature at a rate of 1–2 °C every five minutes. Severe hyperthermia (core temperature greater than 44 °C) may occur, and lead to a marked increase in oxygen consumption, CO2 production, widespread vital organ dysfunction, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) [18].

Uncontrolled hypermetabolism leads to respiratory and in most cases metabolic acidosis due to rapid consumption of energy stores and ATP. If untreated, continuing myocyte death and rhabdomyolysis result in life-threatening hyperkalemia; myoglobinuria may lead to acute renal failure. Additional life-threatening complications include DIC, congestive heart failure, bowel ischemia, and compartment syndrome of the limbs secondary to profound muscle swelling. Indeed, when body temperature exceeds approximately 41 °C, DIC is the usual cause of death.

Rhabdomyolysis

Rhabdomyolysis refers to the breakdown of skeletal muscle, which is associated with excretion of myoglobin in the urine. Classically, MH presents with hypercarbia, tachycardia, cardiac arrhythmias, pyrexia, rigidity and metabolic acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis as a late sign. Several reports of isolated rhabdomyolysis apparent immediately following anesthesia or developing up to 24 h post anesthesia have been reported [19, 20]. Increased creatine kinase (CK) measurement and a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT, covered in a subsequent section) have been obtained in these patients, indicating MH susceptibility. MH-like muscle responses however, can represent false positive diagnoses and an underlying myopathic process may produce a positive IVCT [21] so there must remain some doubt on the validity of this feature i.e., rhabdomyolysis as an expression of MH. Burns et al. stated however that MH should be considered in all patients presenting with rhabdomyolysis where the degree of muscle necrosis exceeds that expected for the severity of the accompanying disorder [22]. The most prudent diagnostic course, therefore, is contracture testing for MH susceptibility.

Complications

A recent report from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry (NAMHR) of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) demonstrated that early recognition of the signs of MH and routine use of core temperature monitoring are essential in minimizing morbidity and mortality from MH. Larach and colleagues showed that in analyzing deaths from MH, in 8 of 84 patients the risk of dying from MH was about 14 times greater in those patients where core temperature monitoring was not used and 9.7 times greater where only skin temperature monitoring was used. The data also showed that the likelihood of any complication increased 2.9 times per 2o C in maximum temperature and 1.6 times per 30 min delay in dantrolene use. Furthermore, the time interval between anesthetic induction to maximum ETCO2 was longer in cases with cardiac arrest/death compared with the others (216 versus 87 min) [23]. Other signs include acidosis, tachypnea and hyperkalemia. The progression of the syndrome may be rapid and dramatic, particularly if precipitated by succinylcholine, or more slowly and not become manifest until after several hours after induction of anesthesia.

Pharmacological triggers

Numerous factors could be involved in triggering MH – age, type of anesthetic, environmental temperature, mitigating drugs administered simultaneously, genetic makeup and degree and type of stress [2].

All inhalation anesthetics except nitrous oxide are triggers for MH. The muscle relaxant succinylcholine is also a trigger for MH. No other anesthetic drugs appear to be triggers, including propofol and ketamine. Neither are catecholamines, nondepolarizing muscle relaxants, catechol congeners, digitalis or similar agents [24].

Another potential risk factor is the use of inhalational sedation devices postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU) for a range of different conditions [2528]. Patients susceptible to MH also resident in the ICU may be at risk from such exposure, although administration of sevoflurane via the AnaConDa® device was found to be safe for healthcare workers with the caveat that a gas extraction system should be used in conjunction with such devices to reduce occupational exposure [29]. A case of MH triggered by sevoflurane administration via an AnaConDa® was reported in a patient admitted to ICU for lumbalgia. MH susceptibility was confirmed at a later date, highlighting the significance of MH differential diagnosis in intensive care patients admitted for other conditions, if these types of sedation devices are used [30].

Disorders associated with malignant hyperthermia

Succinylcholine induced masseter muscle rigidity (MMR) occurs in 1 in 100 children with anesthesia induced by halothane and given succinylcholine [31]. The incidence is probably the same following induction with sevoflurane, but much less following induction with thiopental [32]. The clinical incidence of MH as defined by arterial blood gas changes is about 15 % after MMR. However, muscle biopsy reveals that 50 % of patients experiencing MMR are MH susceptible [33]. Patients with generalized rigidity along with MMR are at much greater risk for MH. Kaplan (personal communication,) has hypothesized that children with “jaws of steel” as opposed to mild rigidity after administration are at greater risk for MH. He has hypothesized that the children with the more dramatic masseter rigidity are more often referred for biopsy and hence the high incidence of positive biopsies.

Central Core Disease (CCD) is a rare non-progressive myopathy with mainly autosomal dominant inheritance, presenting in infancy and characterized by hypotonia and proximal muscle weakness. A few families demonstrate autosomal recessive inheritance. Histological examination of affected muscles shows a predominance of type I fibres containing clearly defined areas (cores) lacking oxidative enzyme activity [3436].

CCD patients are often susceptible to MH as confirmed by accepted muscle biopsy caffeine-halothane contracture testing (either IVCT or the CHCT-caffeine halothane contracture test – see laboratory diagnostic methods section), but MH and CCD phenotypes do not always co-segregate within families. Patients with MH may present with cores despite being clinically asymptomatic and with some RYR1 variants (specifically some of those in the C-terminal transmembrane domain of the protein) specific to CCD. DNA Sequencing showed that RYR1 variants occurred in over 93 % (25 out of 27) of Japanese patients with CCD [37]. While this is of importance, it may not reflect the incidence of RYR1 mutations in other populations. Another study indicated that the distribution and frequency of RYR1 variants differed markedly in the Japanese MH susceptible population as compared to the North American and European MH susceptible population [11]. Although RYR1 variants are the most common identified cause of CCD, it does show genetic heterogeneity, with several rare susceptibility loci known (the ACTA1 gene, in association with nemaline myopathy, and the MYH7 gene, in association with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), with further loci yet to be identified [38].

Other myopathies that have been suggested to be associated with MH susceptibility include MmD and centronuclear myopathy. MmD is an early onset congenital myopathy that may affect bulbar, respiratory and extraocular muscles and has autosomal recessive inheritance [39]. Recessive variants in RYR1 have been associated with MmD, some of which result in altered Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and others that do not [40]. Taken together, these observations suggest that there may be a subset of RYR1 variants that result in both MH and MmD and a subset that are associated only with MmD, similar to the situation with MH and CCD. Consequently, it will be important to distinguish between RYR1 variants that result in MmD, and those that do not.

King (or King-Denborough) syndrome [41] is a rare myopathy characterized by dysmorphic facies, ptosis, down-slanting palpebral fissures, hypertelorism, epicanthic folds, low-set ears, malar hypoplasia, micrognathia, high-arched palate, clinodactyly, palmar simian line, pectus excavatum, winging of the scapulae, lumbar lordosis and mild thoracic scoliosis. The patients with King-Denborough syndrome also present congenital hypotonia, slightly delayed motor development, diffuse joint hyperextensibility and mild proximal weakness. Such patients are MH susceptible. Gillies et al. identified a causative mutation in one family affected with King-Denborough syndrome [42]. Dowling however, did not find a causative mutation to be a consistent feature in this syndrome [43].

Etiology

MH is considered to be a pharmacogenetic disorder which results in a hypermetabolic state [44]. Experimental evidence clearly indicates that the signs and symptoms of MH are related to an uncontrolled release of intracellular Ca2+ from skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) [45]. In MH susceptible swine and in “knock-in” mice, a variety of environmental conditions can trigger accelerated Ca2+ release from the SR such as environmental heat, exercise and stress. In humans, however, clinical MH results most often from exposure to potent inhalation anesthetics +/− succinylcholine. The enhanced intracellular Ca2+ results in abnormal skeletal muscle metabolism manifesting as activation of muscle contraction, increased oxygen consumption and CO2 production, ATP hydrolysis and heat production. The normal sequestration of released Ca2+ by the SR/ER Ca2+ -ATPase (SERCA) is inadequate and energy is expended in a futile manner, in an attempt to lower intracellular Ca2+. Presumably, the declining levels of ATP lead to failure of membrane integrity and release of potassium and CK, although the exact steps in the process have not been definitively demonstrated.

A defective or disordered Ca2+ channel located in the SR membrane underlies MH susceptibility. This channel is termed the ryanodine receptor (RyR1). As many as 70 % of families susceptible to MH harbor one of 34 causal mutations for MH, with many other variants yet to be characterized [46]. The channel is closely associated with many other proteins, such as the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) Ca2+ channel, situated in the T-tubule region of the sarcolemma that mediates transfer of voltage change to the RyR1 receptor. Other proteins with potential or known roles in RyR1 function include integral SR membrane proteins (eg. SRP-27 [47], junctate [48], the transient receptor potential cation channel (TRPC) family [4850] and triadin [51]), plasma membrane-associated proteins (eg. CIC-1 chloride channels [52] and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers [53]), as well as proteins that appear to have a role in stabilizing the junction between the plasma membrane and sarcoplasmic reticulum (eg. junctophilin and caveolin-3) by interacting with both DHPR and RyR1 [54]. Proteins that modulate the function of RyR1 include the FK508 binding protein FKBP12 [55], the Ca2+ binding protein calmodulin [56], the histidine-rich Ca2+ protein, HRC [57] and the luminal Ca2+ buffer calsequestrin. HRC is also a luminal protein known to interact with both triadin and SERCA and has been suggested to have a role in mediating cross talk between SR Ca2+ uptake and release [57].

At least six genetic loci, other than RYR1 have been implicated in MH, although only one other gene, CACNA1S, encoding the main subunit of the DHPR, has been shown to be altered by an MH-linked variant [5860]. Calsequestrin has been suggested as another candidate for MH from studies using a CASQ1 knock-out mouse [6163]. These mice exhibited susceptibility to heat- and anesthetic-induced mortality, analogous to MH. While some CASQ1 variants have been identified in humans [64], there is thus far no definitive evidence that variants in this gene can cause MH [65]. Recently, a variant in the STAC3 gene has been linked to MH susceptibility in a native American tribe in the USA [66]. Ablation of stac3 in Zebrafish results in a severe locomotor defect and a decrease in excitation-contraction coupling [67]. STAC3 knock-out mice exhibit paralysis and perinatal lethality as well as a range of musculoskeletal defects [68]. In support of a role in excitation-contraction coupling, the STAC3 protein was shown to traffic together with the DHPR and has been suggested to be an essential chaperone of DHPR in skeletal muscle [69].

JP-45, encoded by JSPR1, is another integral SR protein that has been shown to colocalize with the RyR1 and also interacts with the DHPR and calsequestrin. Overexpression of JP-45 in a mouse myotube cell line has been shown to decrease charge movement through the DHPR. Depletion of JP-45 in the same system decreased both the content of DHPR and charge movement through this channel [70]. Two JSPR1 variants have been recently identified in patients with and without MH. Expression of either one of these JP-45 variants in mouse muscle fibres exhibited a decrease in the sensitivity of DHPR to activation. These results suggest that the overall phenotype of an individual with both a JSPR1 mutation and a causative RYR1 mutation would be less severe than if the RYR1 mutation was expressed alone [71]. These observations highlight the possibility of polymorphic variants modulating RYR1 function and may help to explain the variable phenotype observed for MH susceptibility [9, 72].

Genotype-phenotype correlations are weak for both the clinical expression of MH and the response of isolated muscle to caffeine or halothane. It therefore seems clear that a variety of modulators influence the manifestations of the syndrome. Fatty acids represent one set of modulators that has been studied in this respect [73, 74]. Certain unsaturated fatty acids have been demonstrated to increase the sensitivity of halothane-induced Ca2+ release in vitro. Such an increase in fatty acids may result from breakdown of triglycerides as a result of enzymatic abnormalities. More recently, a decrease in S-palmitoylation at cysteine residues in the N-terminal region of RyR1 has been shown to decrease stimulus-coupled Ca2+ release via RyR1 [75]. Ryanodine receptor function can also be altered by other post-translational modifications. Phosphorylation, glutathionylation, oxidation and nitrosylation of RyR1 have each been shown to modulate Ca2+ release from the SR, but the causes and functional consequences of these modifications are not well defined [7680]. Eight of the eighteen cysteine residues subject to S-palmitoylation are also targets for N-nitrosylation or S-oxidation, suggesting that post-translational cross-talk may have a role in regulating RyR1 [75]. SERCA and the DHPR are also subject to S-palmitoylation suggesting that fatty acids may have more extensive roles in excitation-contraction coupling and hence MH.

In addition, cultured muscle cells from MH susceptible patients show a shift of subtypes of sodium channels leading to a longer membrane depolarization and an increased Ca2+ release from the terminal cisternae [81, 82]. Changes in sodium channel function, either through sodium channel mutations or through effects of fatty acids may influence the phenotypic expression of MH, especially muscle rigidity.

Ca2+ depletion of the SR via skeletal muscle RyR1 activity has also been shown to induce Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane. Both store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) and excitation-coupled Ca2+ entry (ECCE) are involved [8385]. While the exact mechanisms that control these phenomena are unclear, membrane proteins such as STIM1, Orai1 and the TRPCs have been implicated, as have their potential interactions with RyR1 [86]. The DHPR is thought to be a major contributor to ECCE [87]. STIM1 and Orai1 have been shown to colocalize to the skeletal muscle triad junction [88]. In another study, STIM1 was shown to interact with the DHPR in a Ca2+-independent manner and overexpression of STIM1 attenuated Ca2+ -release in a DHPR receptor-dependent manner suggesting that STIM1 negatively regulates Ca2+-release from the SR [89] and thus may be involved in both SOCE and excitation-contraction coupling. Muscle cells from the RYR1 R163C mutant mouse exhibited elevated myoplasmic free Ca2+ due to a passive leak from the SR. Inhibition of non-specific plasma membrane cation channels in these cells was more effective at reducing Ca2+ entry and myoplasmic free Ca2+ than overexpression of a dominant negative Orai1. These results suggested that SOCE was not due to a STIM1/Orai1 pathway but to a non-specific plasma membrane channel, which in turn has been implicated in the MH phenotype [90]. Thus functional dysregulation associated with any one of these proteins could also affect the function of RyR1 and have implications for susceptibility to MH.

Transfecting cultured muscle cells or myotubes with one of the known causal mutations results in enhanced intracellular Ca2+ release when the cells are exposed to agents such as halothane, caffeine or 4-chloro-m-cresol [9196]. Several mouse models of MH have been developed by introducing the rabbit RYR1 cDNA into the dyspedic mouse [97], providing insights into the functional significance of introduced RYR1 variants [98103]. It is clear from these studies that different RYR1 variants have different functional effects and that not every RYR1 variant when expressed in a mouse model will exhibit a classic MH-sensitive phenotype. For example RYR1 R163C [104] or Y522S [98] heterozygous knock-in mice exhibit symptoms like MH and are associated with increased flux of Ca2+ into the cytosol, while the I4898T (I4895T in mice) CCD variant causes muscle weakness, likely due to a reduction in Ca2+ release [105]. In addition, the Y522S homozygous mice are non-viable, while R163C and T4826I homozygous mice are viable.

Diagnostic methods

The diagnosis of MH is based on clinical presentation or laboratory testing. The principal diagnostic features of MH are unexplained elevation of ETCO2 concentration, muscle rigidity, tachycardia, acidosis, hyperthermia, and hyperkalemia. The variability in the order and time of onset of signs often makes the clinical diagnosis rather difficult.

Occasionally the first indication of MH susceptibility may be a raised CK measurement. Raised CK as evidence of MH susceptibility has been previously discussed in detail [106]. Briefly, there is no clear evidence that raised CK is unequivocally symptomatic of MH susceptibility.

Clinical grading scale

A clinical grading scale was developed by Larach and colleagues [107] through an iterative Delphic process in order to assist in clinical diagnosis. The elements of the scale are given in Table 1. Differential weighting is given to each of the manifestations of the syndrome. The scale lacks sensitivity however, since not all tests may be performed in an individual episode.
Table 1

Criteria used in the Clinical Grading Scale for Malignant Hyperthermia

Process

Indicator

I: Rigidity

a. Generalized muscular rigidity (in absence of shivering due to hypothermia, or during or immediately following emergence from inhalational anesthesia)

b. Masseter spasm shortly following succinylcholine administration

II: Muscle Breakdown

a. Elevated creatine kinase >20,000 IU after anesthetic that included succinylcholine

b. Elevated creatine kinase >10,000 IU after anesthetic without succinylcholine

c. Cola colored urine in perioperative period

d. Myoglobin in urine >60 μg/L

e. Myoglobin in serum >170 μg/L

f. Blood/plasma/serum K+ > 6 mEq/L (in absence of renal failure)

III: Respiratory Acidosis

a. PETCO2 > 55 mmHg with appropriately controlled ventilation

b. Arterial PaCO2 > 60 mmHg with appropriately controlled ventilation

c. PETCO2 > 60 mmHg with spontaneous ventilation

d. Arterial PaCO2 > 65 mmHg with spontaneous ventilation

e. Inappropriate hypercarbia (in anesthesiologist’s judgment)

f. Inappropriate tachypnea

IV: Temperature Increase

a. Inappropriately rapid increase in temperature (in anesthesiologist’s judgement)

b. Inappropriately increased temperature > 38.8 °C (101.8 °F) in the perioperative period (in anesthesiologist’s judgment)

V: Cardiac Involvement

a. Inappropriate sinus tachycardia

b. Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation

Each process is weighted and scored according to its significance in differentiating MH from other causes of change in the physiologic process. Only one element in each process need be present to qualify for scoring. A score is then generated assessing the likelihood of the episode being an MH episode on a scale from almost never to almost certain. Being a clinical scale and depending on the presence of laboratory tests, its value resides mainly in identifying those subjects with the most convincing episodes of MH for subsequent evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests.

Laboratory diagnostic methods

The “gold standard” for diagnosis of MH is currently an in vitro contracture test, which is based on contracture of muscle fibers in the presence of halothane or caffeine. Two widely used forms of this test have been developed; one (IVCT) by the European Malignant Hyperthermia group (EMHG) and the other (CHCT) by the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Group (NAMHG) [108, 109]. Using the EMHG protocol, an individual is considered susceptible to MH (MHS) when both caffeine and halothane test results are positive. An individual is considered not susceptible to MH (MHN) when both tests are negative. An individual is also diagnosed as MHS when either a positive halothane or caffeine test alone is obtained and these individuals are designated MHS(h) or MHS(c). This nomenclature was determined at the 32nd EMHG meeting in Basel, Switzerland, 2013. This test is similar to the NAMHG protocol but there are differences in the concentrations used and mode of testing agents. Sensitivity of 99 % and a specificity of 94 % are obtained with the EMHG protocol [110] while figures of 97 % sensitivity and 78 % specificity are reported for the NAMHG protocol [111], which provide some confidence to the results obtained. The specificity of either protocol may be affected by neuromuscular disorders unrelated to MH, which have an associated increase in myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration [109, 112]. Studies based on results from monozygotic twins however, indicate that the IVCT has acceptable reproducibility [113]. A third variation of the IVCT, the caffeine skinned fiber test, does not appear to be used diagnostically outside of Japan, and has lower specificity and sensitivity than either the EMHG or NAMHG protocols [114].

IVCT is expensive, confined to specialized testing centers, requires a surgical procedure and can yield false positive or negative results. Modifications of the EMHG protocol include the use of ryanodine [115] or 4-chloro-m-cresol [116] (but to date these agents have not been included in the standard protocol). A possible alternative testing agent is the fluorinated ether sevoflurane, however trials with this agent have not found responses consistent with halothane [117].

Other biochemical, hematological and physical tests lack significant sensitivity and specificity to be used diagnostically. A further caveat with these tests is that the results may be difficult to interpret in a patient suffering from a myopathy other than MH such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy where intracellular Ca2+ is elevated at baseline.

A variety of minimally invasive diagnostic tests have been investigated. These include nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate ATP depletion [118], metabolite assays and microdialysis of caffeine to elicit an enhanced release of carbon dioxide from the muscle tissue [119]. The ethics of injecting a triggering agent, even a small volume into a potentially susceptible individual have to be questioned and determination of cutoff points would be difficult.

DNA analysis, however, offers an alternative to the IVCT, requiring only a blood specimen, which can be sent to an accredited diagnostic laboratory. To date 50 to 70 % of MH susceptibility has been linked to RYR1 with over 400 variants associated with MH being identified within this gene [120]. While the majority of variants lead to a single amino acid change in the receptor, deletions or truncations have also been reported. A number of recessive variants result in MH, CCD or related disorders [121124].

At least 44 variants have been reported in the RYR1 gene in association with CCD. In general terms, a single point RYR1 variant can cause (a) CCD only, (b) MH only, (c) MH with variable CCD penetrance. In this latter case, the likelihood of an RYR1 mutation resulting in both MH and CCD depends on a number of factors including sensitivity of mutant protein to agonists, size of the intracellular Ca2+ pool and the level of abnormality in channel-gating [125]. All individuals with the variant should be considered as MH susceptible, while they may or may not have CCD. If a variant specific to CCD is identified in a family, MH is not automatically excluded as a second variant may be present and MH susceptibility needs to be assessed by IVCT or CHCT or family members treated as if they are MH susceptible [126]. An MH negative parent eliminates susceptibility in the children although CCD may still be present.

While traditional DNA sequencing from either genomic DNA or complementary DNA prepared from muscle biopsy tissue are time consuming and laborious, the advent of massively parallel sequencing (or next generation sequencing, NGS) provides potentially cost effective, rapid and high throughput platforms for both variant discovery and diagnosis at the whole genome level [127]). A number of RYR1 or CACNA1S variants have been identified using next generation sequencing (NGS) [128131]. Some caution in this approach should however, be exercised as none of the currently available platforms for sequencing, or chemistry for sample preparation, or analysis software are able to yield 100 % coverage of all exons in the human genome [132]. Pathogenicity prediction is problematic (see below) and an additional consideration is the ethical dilemma associated with the reporting of incidental findings [133].

The EMHG has established criteria including functional studies of DNA variants to establish that the variant is clinically significant [134]. Thirty-four mutations within RYR1 have been shown to cause an alteration in Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. A number of functional tests have been used successfully to assess the role of RYR1 variants in Ca2+ release. These include the use of lymphoblastoid cell lines generated from MHS individuals [40, 135138], COS-7 or HEK293 cells transfected with the cDNA for rabbit or human [93, 95] RYR1 carrying point mutations introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, myotubes generated from muscle biopsy tissue and 1B5 dyspedic myotubes transduced with wild type or mutated RYR1 cDNA [97, 139, 140]. Ca2+ release can be monitored and quantified directly using Ca2+-specific indicators or indirectly using [3H] ryanodine binding assays [94] or by proton release [138, 141]. Systems using 1B5 dyspedic myotubes are more physiological as they constitutively express all the components of the skeletal muscle with the exception of RYR1 [97]. To date, all mutations functionally characterized have been shown to cause alterations in Ca2+ flux through the ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channel.

Pathogenicity prediction of new variants

Whole exome or targeted exon NGS is becoming the preferred option for variant detection and is being used diagnostically. The vast numbers of identified variants of unknown significance (VUS), which may or may not be associated with a certain disease have to be filtered. This is a significant bottleneck in DNA-based diagnosis for MH because of the large size of the RYR1 gene, the large number of known uncharacterized variants and the technical difficulty involved with functional analysis. To be able to predict accurately the pathogenicity for a specific variant would considerably aid diagnosis and prevention of MH episodes.

There are many bioinformatic tools freely available (for example PolyPhen2 [142], Pmut [143], SIFT [144], MutPred [145] and SNPs&GO [146] that allow pathogenicity prediction of VUS. The accuracy of the predictions however, varies from program to program. Some of them have been trained on mutations in the on-line mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM) and human genome mutation database (HGMD) repositories, whereas others predict pathogenicity according to sequence homology of ortholog proteins.

PolyPhen2 scores are displayed in the Exome Variant Server (EVS) while both PolyPhen and SIFT scores are provided in the 1000 genomes browser. According to all the available information about a variant from the literature, genome databases as well as bioinformatic analysis and segregation analysis, the variants are classed into “definitively benign, probably benign, uncertain pathogenicity, probably pathogenic and definitely pathogenic” [7]. There is always a degree of uncertainty with any in silico analysis. While such predictions are useful in selecting variants for functional analysis it would be premature to begin using them for clinical diagnosis of MH susceptibility.

In summary, because of the heterogeneity of the disorder, as well as discordance within families, a negative DNA result cannot be used to rule out MH susceptibility. In addition, only those variants that have been biochemically characterized to affect SR Ca2+ release can be used to test for MH susceptibility.

Differential diagnosis

A variety of unusual conditions may resemble MH during anesthesia including sepsis, thyroid storm, pheochromocytoma, and iatrogenic overheating. Hence, a high index of suspicion for these disorders as well as the ability to measure ETCO2 and obtain arterial and venous blood gas analysis is essential in order to differentiate them from MH. Particularly problematic is the unexplained hyperthermia following anesthesia. Since anesthetic gases generally inhibit the febrile response, the first sign of sepsis may be marked hyperthermia on emergence from anesthesia. Response to antipyretics as well as the clinical setting is often helpful in differentiating this response from MH. As stated earlier hyperthermia occurring after one hour post anesthesia is not related to MH. The differential diagnosis of unexplained increased ETCO2 includes hyperthermia secondary to sepsis, or iatrogenic warming, machine valve malfunction, rebreathing, as well as faulty equipment.

Outside the operating room, an MH-like syndrome may occur following injection of ionic contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid, cocaine overdose, and in neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), serotonin syndrome and 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) overdose. NMS is a potentially fatal hyperthermic syndrome that occurs as a result of ingestion of drugs used in the treatment of mental and nervous conditions such as schizophrenia. The incidence is approximately 0.01–0.02 % of those being treated with these drugs such as older as well as newer antipsychotics and haloperidol, a sedative agent often used in the ICU to treat agitation. Other dopamine antagonists also have been reported to cause NMS.

The signs of NMS include muscle rigidity, acidosis, high fever and rhabdomyolysis. The pathophysiology is thought to result from dopamine receptor blockade. Treatment includes benzodiazepines, bromocriptine and even dantrolene. There does not appear to be any cross over susceptibility to MH or vice versa. There is no laboratory diagnostic test for the syndrome either [147, 148]. The serotonin syndrome can be associated with hyperthermia, changes in muscle tone and rhabdomyolysis in conjunction with the use of drugs that inhibit serotonin uptake or increase receptor sensitivity to serotonin. Heat-related illnesses are discussed in a later section.

If a high ionic, water-soluble radiologic contrast agent is injected intrathecally, usually as a result of drug mixup, a characteristic progression of signs occurs. After the injection, the patient appears to recover normally, but within thirty minutes involuntary jerking movements begin in the lower extremities and ascend to the upper body, finally resulting in seizures and hyperthermia. This is the result of the contrast agent entering the cerebral ventricles and requires a rapid symptomatic treatment of muscle activity, hyperthermia, and acidosis (cooling, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers, ventilation, and sedation [149]). The response of signs of hyperthermia, tachycardia and tachypnea to dantrolene in such syndromes is non-specific. In other words, the response to dantrolene does not per se prove MH susceptibility.

A syndrome often confused with MH is sudden hyperkalemic cardiac arrest during or shortly after anesthesia in young males. Following sporadic reports of such arrests, Larach and colleagues identified that patients with an occult myopathy, especially a dystrophinopathy such as Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy [150], are at risk to dramatic life-threatening hyperkalemia upon administration of succinylcholine. More recently, it has been shown that administration of potent volatile agents to such patients may produce a similar syndrome [151].

Since the most common muscular dystrophy (Duchenne’s) is found with a frequency of 1 in 3500 live male births, and the onset of symptoms of muscle weakness may be as late as 6–8 years of age, some apparently healthy children may really be at risk of succinylcholine induced hyperkalemia. Hence, when a young child or young adult experiences a sudden and apparently unexpected cardiac arrest, think of hyperkalemia, document and treat it in the standard fashion (Ca2+, bicarbonate, glucose and insulin, and hyperventilation). Muscle tissue should be obtained and preserved for testing for a myopathy, specifically a dystrophinopathy. In general, the patient with a dystrophinopathy that develops these anesthetic-related complications does not also exhibit classic signs of MH, such as hyperthermia or marked muscle rigidity. They do, however, develop rhabdomyolysis. Therefore, this reaction is not malignant hyperthermia per se, since the dystrophinopathies are caused by mutations on the X chromosome and dantrolene will not be effective.

In response to the presentation of over 30 such cases to the Food and Drug Administration Agency (FDA) of the USA in 1992, a warning was issued to avoid the use of succinylcholine in children and young adolescents for elective cases. Succinylcholine should be reserved for those cases of full stomach and possibly airway related emergencies.

Disorders not associated with MH include muscular dystrophies, myotonias, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta and arthrogryposis.

Genetic counseling

MH is an autosomal dominant genetic condition. Genetic testing has potential ramifications for the current health of that individual, but it may also have ramifications for the future health of that individual and the future health of their immediate relatives. Test results may leave the individuals disadvantaged in terms of their ability to access health insurance or life insurance, employment opportunities and, in some cultures, may even affect marital opportunities [152]. For this reason it is recommended that each individual accessing any form of genetic testing, and indeed each individual undergoing IVCT or DNA analysis, should be fully informed of all the implications of each potential result and should be able to provide informed consent prior to diagnostic testing [153].

It is also important to note that availability of the various forms of genome sequencing will place an additional burden on both the genetic counselor and the families concerned as well as the clinician ordering the test since genetic variants will sometimes be identified as an incidental finding on whole exome or whole genome testing [154]. Implications for the new born should also be considered [155].

Interpreting risk for other family members

When initiating genetic analysis in a branch of a known family, it is important to test the individual at the highest risk first. In general, an affected proband will have inherited MH sensitivity from one of the parents. Clarification of which parent may also be MHS is useful for identifying which side of the extended family may be at risk. The risk to the siblings depends on the genetic status of the parents. If a parent is identified as MHS, then each of the proband’s siblings has a 50 % chance of also being MHS. If both parents receive an MHN result on IVCT and RYR1 analysis – suggesting the mutation is de novo in the proband – then the proband’s siblings are at no greater risk than the general population. The risk for offspring of each individual with proven MHS also has a 50 % chance of being MHS. The proband’s grandchildren would be considered to be at 25 % risk until their parent’s genetic status is clarified. An individual who is MHN cannot pass MH sensitivity on to the next generation, however, if they have an affected parent, their siblings may still be at risk.

Autonomy in clinical testing for MH

Some individuals may wish to delay IVCT or RYR1 analysis, while they consider the information they have been given and/or make the necessary preparations. Others may decide that they do not want their risk clarified by clinical testing. These decisions should be respected and these individuals considered being MHS until proven otherwise. Care should then be taken when arranging testing for the offspring of these individuals as a positive result in the next generation will generate a result for the individual who did not want to know (the individual must have carried the gene mutation in order to pass it on).

Management and treatment

Dantrolene is the only drug known to specifically treat MH. Dantrolene inhibits the DHPR in an RyR1-dependent manner [156], has been found to bind to a specific site on the RyR1 protein [157] and reduces RyR1 channel activity in intact muscle cells (Dirksen R – personal communication). The drug, introduced in 1979, has been responsible for lowering the mortality from MH to 1.4 % in North America (see final comment). The original preparation called Dantrium contains 20 mg of a lyophilized form of the drug per vial, which must be reconstituted before injection.

Acute MH crisis

The essential points in the treatment of an acute MH crisis are the immediate discontinuation of trigger agents, hyperventilation, administration of dantrolene in doses of 2.5 mg/kg repeated pro re nata to limit MH, cooling by all routes available (intravenous saline at 4o C, topical ice to all exposed areas, peritoneal exchange). Nasogastric lavage and bladder irrigation are contraindicated as complications such as gastric rupture can occur. Hyperkalaemia should be managed in a standard fashion. Ca2+ blockers viz verapamil should not be used along with dantrolene, since hyperkalemia and profound hypotension may occur with such a drug combination [16, 158]. The steps in the treatment of acute MH are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Managing an MH crisis

Action

Notes

Stop potent inhalation agents

Turn vaporisers "OFF" and /or activated charcoal filters inserted into the circuit

Do not repeat succinylcholine if it has been previously administered

 

Increase minute ventilation to lower ETCO2

Eliminate the inhalational agent

Get help

• Duty anesthestist

• Consultant anesthetist

Prepare and administer dantrolene

• 2.5 mg/kg initial dose

• Every 10–15 min until acidosis, pyrexia, muscle rigidity are resolving

Begin cooling measures if hyperthermic

• Tissue destruction will occur at 41.5 °C

• Use intravenous normal saline at 4 °C.

• Ice Packs to all exposed areas

• More aggressive measures as needed

Stop cooling measures at 38.5 °C

 

Treat arrhythmias as needed

• Amiodarone is the first choice

• Lignocaine

• Do not use calcium channel blockers

Secure blood gases, electrolytes, creatine kinase, blood and urine for myoglobin

• Coagulation profile check values regularly

• Treat hyperkalemia with hyperventilation, glucose and insulin as needed

•Once crisis is under control, an MH hotline should be contacted for further guidance

Continue dantrolene

• 1 mg/kg every 4–8 h for 24–48 h

•Alternatively and only if recrudescence occurs, dantrolene at 2.5 mg/kg bolus

Ensure urine output of 2 mL/kg/h with

• Mannitol

• Furosemide

• Fluids as needed

Evaluate need for invasive monitoring and continued mechanical ventilation.

 

Observe patient in Intensive Care Unit

At least 24 h

Refer patient and family for MH Testing

Contracture or DNA testing

More information on treating an MH crisis can be found on the MHANZ and MHAUS websites where detailed task cards, a management poster and other cognitive aids and educational material have been made freely available [159, 160]. Standard operating procedures for patient safety in anesthesia have also been published in the German language [161].

Dantrolene

There are two preparations of Dantrolene available. The conventional version, Dantrium®, is available in 20 mg vials which are poorly soluble and each require 60 mL of sterile water to prepare. An average adult may therefore require 8–10 ampoules for initial treatment. Ryanodex® is a new alternative preparation approved by the FDA, available in 250 mg ampoules which only require 5 mL of sterile water diluent to reconstitute, and solubility has been improved. Therefore initial treatment can now be achieved with administration of only one ampoule. Titrate dantrolene to tachycardia and hypercarbia; there is no upper limit to the dose of dantrolene [16]. If however, more than 10 mg/kg of dantrolene is administered, the diagnosis of MH should be reconsidered. Other possible causes of MH-like symptoms include sepsis, NMS, intracranial hemorrhage, pneumonia, baclofen withdrawal [162].

Patients experiencing MH should receive dantrolene and be monitored closely for 48–72 h, since (even despite dantrolene treatment) 25 % of patients will experience a recrudescence of the syndrome [163]. Tests for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) should be included as well as observation of urine for myoglobinuric renal failure. DIC is most frequent when body temperature exceeds about 41 ° C.

Since masseter muscle rigidity (MMR) may presage MH, it is most advisable to discontinue the trigger anesthetic after MMR. In an emergency, the anesthesia may continue with “non-trigger” drugs. Following MMR, patients should be admitted to an intensive care unit and monitored for signs of MH. Rhabdomyolysis occurs in virtually all patients experiencing MMR and the creatine kinase (CK) values should be checked regularly. Dantrolene should be administered if the other signs of MH occur along with MMR. Muscle biopsy for definitive diagnosis should be carefully considered.

It is remarkable that dantrolene may be efficacious in treating hyperthermia from many causes unrelated to MH with anesthesia. Based on the similarity between a variety of drug induced hyperthermic syndromes and MH, dantrolene has been used effectively to treat several other syndromes such as the neuroleptic malignant syndrome, MDMA toxicity and hyperthermia related to new onset of juvenile diabetes in adolescents [164, 165].

In many countries, a “hotline” has been established to provide emergency assistance in the management of MH. Many are listed on the web site of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the USA [160].

Experience from the Malignant Hyperthermia Hotline in the US as well as a recent retrospective review has shown that dantrolene may dramatically reverse life-threatening hyperthermia in a nonspecific manner. Considering that the toxicity of dantrolene is minimal when used for short periods clinicians have found the drug to be extremely useful. Adverse effects of dantrolene in short term administration are minor and may include phlebitis in 9 % of cases, transient muscle weakness in 21 %, gastrointestinal upset in 4 % and respiratory compromise in patients with preexisting muscle disorders [166]. A caveat is that success in controlling hyperthermia does not imply that the patient is at risk for Malignant Hyperthermia Syndrome.

Management of the MH susceptible patient for anesthesia

Ideally the patient should be seen preoperatively and risks discussed. In most cases the risk of problems is low and the possibility of a stress-induced episode can effectively be regarded as zero.

Patients who are known to be MH susceptible may be anesthetized with regional anesthesia or local anesthesia without problems. If general anesthesia or sedation is required, potent volatile agents and succinylcholine must be avoided. Non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and all intravenous inducing agents are safe to use. Laryngeal mask airways are safe to reuse if an idle period of 15 h [167] has been observed but the major use of these airways is now single use.

Preparation of newer generation anesthetic machines has become complex. Silicone products incorporated into these machines absorb inhalational anesthetics and result in prolonged release of the agent. Flushing of these machines can take longer that 60 min to achieve a safe level of agent [168]. A vapor-free anesthetic machine would eliminate this problem but it is likely that most anesthetic departments do not have such a machine available. Recent research has demonstrated that activated charcoal filters reduce anesthetic concentrations to safe levels within several minutes and are now being used in some countries. Advice on flow rates should be adhered to [169, 170]. Vaporizers should be disabled, drained or removed if possible.

While traditionally, MH susceptible patients who have undergone non-triggering anesthesia were monitored routinely for four hours in the post-anesthesia care unit, this practice is no longer thought to be necessary [171]. Pretreatment with dantrolene is also not necessary.

Preventive measures

Preventative measures include preoperative assessment and identification of an inherited association with a known family, managing a patient with a suspected history as MH susceptible until testing is undertaken, an operating theatre list of susceptible names in the community and an indication of MH susceptibility on the anesthetic record audit form, labeling hospital records together with a national alert warning on records, and family education is helpful.

Patients with any form of muscle disorder should not receive succinylcholine and caution should be exercised with administration of inhalational agent to patients with other muscle disorders particularly muscular dystrophies especially hypokalemic periodic paralysis, CCD, Duchenne or Becker.

All patients receiving more than a brief general anesthetic should have their core temperature monitored.

Young patients (below age 12 approximately) should not receive succinylcholine for elective procedures, in order to avoid the possibility of hyperkalemic response in a patient with undiagnosed muscular dystrophy.

Total intravenous anesthesia

While it is important to avoid inhalational anesthetics for individuals susceptible to MH, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is not universally recommended for individuals who are not susceptible to MH. Choice of anesthesia, however, is in the realm of the clinician involved. Anesthetic vaporizers and anesthetic machines including gas analyzers are universally available whereas the equipment required for TIVA are not, particularly in developing countries. Inhalational anesthesia is quick, painless and does not require intravenous access, considerations of importance in emergency situations and in children. TIVA carries a higher risk of awareness (5-10x as high) than volatile anesthesia because the amount of anesthetic agent in the patient’s body cannot be measured. Routine use of awareness monitoring is recommended for TIVA general anesthetics [172]. Prolonged inhalational anesthesia has been shown to be safe, the depth of anesthesia can be readily quantified and steady-state measures of potency have been determined for all inhalational anesthetics [173].

Unresolved issues

Risk factors

Stress and exercise

In 1966 the Porcine Stress Syndrome was identified as an “awake” MH episode. Stresses such as fighting cause a rapid death in these animals. Exercise and heat-stroke as potential triggers for an MH episode continue to be debated. Gronert and Denborough, both reported patients with “awake” MH episodes, the latter being patients with exercise-induced heat stroke who responded to dantrolene [174176]. Perhaps the most convincing, though unfortunate, episode of exercise-induced MH was reported by Tobin et al., a fatal episode in a 13-year-old boy who had experienced a clinical episode of MH and developed signs of MH following exercise some months later. He and other family members were found to have a causative RYR1 mutation [177]. Brown et al. reported a possible viral trigger [178]. Several more recent reports also link MH to exertional heat-stroke [179181]. Fatal drug-free stress-induced MH in two unrelated children was also recently linked to the presence of variants in RYR1. Expression of RYR1 with these variants in an heterologous system indicated hypersensitivity to RyR1 agonists, consistent with “awake” MH and heat sensitivity [182].

Further physiological evidence of stress-related MH has been demonstrated by pH changes in MHS muscle recovering from violent exercise [183]. The sympathetic nervous system appears to be only secondarily involved [184]; serotonin (5-hydroxytyrosine) agonists may cause an MH-like syndrome in susceptible pigs but there is limited support for serotonin as a trigger in stress induced episodes [185, 186]. Recent research in mice with the human RYR1 Y522S1 mutation indicates abnormal sensitivity to increased environmental temperatures associated with abnormal Ca2+ release [98]. This latest report, however, should be considered with some caution as the homozygous Y522S mutation in mouse is embryonic lethal, which is a different phenotype to that observed with the homozygous RYR1 R615C2 mutation in pigs and the small number of homozygous RYR1 variants in humans which clearly do not cause embryonic lethality. A more recent study however showed that mice heterozygous for the Y522S mutation exhibited attenuated thermal sensitivity after eccentric exercise [187]. Another study, however, reports that a “knock-in” mouse heterozygous for the human RYR1 R163C mutation is more representative of the human phenotype and thus may provide an important model system for further study of awake-MH [104]. Heat stress also triggers fulminant MH in mice expressing the rabbit equivalent of the human RYR1 T4826I mutation [188].

Wappler et al. described a 34-year-old male with recurrent fever, fatigue, muscle cramping, and aching with mild exercise and emotional stress [189]. IVCT demonstrated an MHS response and a “causative” mutation. Others have reported similar findings [190] and Wappler also reported a series of individuals with positive IVCT and DNA tests [191]. Cappachione et al. described a patient with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis (ER) and multiple loci variants [64]. A possible conclusion is that a small subset of MH patients may display muscle damage and perhaps more ominous signs with exercise or other stresses. It is recommended that MH is excluded in patients who have had episodes of exertional heat stroke [192]. Despite possible links between exertional heat stroke and MH however, treatment with dantrolene has not been rigorously examined.

The risk of an exercise-induced event is remote and patients should be advised to continue with a normal lifestyle although patients should be cautioned regarding the remote, but conceivable possibility of heat stroke in environments in which exposure to high heat and humidity is possible.

Statin therapy

It has been suggested that statins can affect MHS muscle responses as positive contracture results, using the European MH Group protocol, have been observed in some patients on statin therapy [193]. Vladutiu et al. investigated 197 individuals with severe statin myopathy and compared the group with 2 other groups (1) 163 subjects with mild statin myopathy and (2) 122 patients in a statin-tolerant group. RYR1 variants were identified in 3 severe statin myopathy cases, 1 mild myopathy statin individual, 8 patients with non-drug-induced myopathy and no variants were present in controls. This study may indicate that statins may unmask underlying serious myopathies [194].

Discordance

Given the confidence provided by functional analysis of RYR1 variants, the problem of discordance between RYR1 mutations and MHS and MHS (h) or MHS (c) still remains the largest problem associated with genetic diagnosis of susceptibility to MH. The MHS (h) or MHS (c) diagnosis is the most problematic and exhibits a much higher level of discordance than does MHS. Correlation between RYR1 variants and IVCT is greater for the caffeine (c) than the halothane (h) response [195] suggesting that the MHS(c) has greater diagnostic potential. The NAMHG protocol does not allow the MHS (h) or MHS (c) diagnosis; the potential for discordance between IVCT phenotype and RYR1 genotype is therefore much greater. In a large UK study investigating the relationship between RYR1 genotype and IVCT phenotype, discordance was identified in seven families (nine individuals), with five false-positives and four false-negatives [196]. Discordance has also been observed between RYR1 causative mutations and IVCT results in 6/96 individuals in 4 Belgian families [197]. RYR1 mutation negative MHS individuals have also been observed (Recent unpublished data give an approximate 2.5 % discordance rate of this type in a large series of UK patients.) Clear evidence of the involvement of genes as well as RYR1, has been shown in a New Zealand Maori pedigree where MHS correlates with a RYR1 T4826I mutation [178] but three branches of the family possess unrelated chromosome 19 haplotypes, without the T4826I mutation in unambiguous MHS individuals spanning three or four generations. While some discordance may be explained by the existence of other yet unidentified variants, false positive IVCT tests [198] and variants associated with weak contractures have also been implicated. Discordance has been attributed to epigenetic alterations at the RYR1 locus causing silencing [199] but until recently no evidence had been provided that the RYR1 gene would be silenced [200]. A more recent report however, suggests that decreased expression of muscle-specific microRNAs correlated with epigenetic changes at the RYR1 locus and reduced expression of RYR1 because of gene silencing [201]. Taken together, these observations suggest that DNA testing should always be used in selected, genetically characterized families, as well as within the guidelines for DNA testing identified by the EMHG or MHAUS [202204]. Using both IVCT and genetic diagnosis, a higher proportion of true positives are likely to be identified than by simply relying on one or other test.

Resources

Many anesthesia textbooks, web sites and articles contain very thorough descriptions of MH and related syndromes. However, these sources often fail to provide information for patients (patient-specific information). Various voluntary organizations throughout the world are dedicated to assisting patients, physicians, anesthesia providers of all types and any one else in managing the MH susceptible and keeping these individuals up to date with the latest information regarding MH.

In the United States, the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) provides newsletters, printed information, an informative website [204] to meet the needs of the various groups interested in MH. In addition, a hotline provides direct consultation for providers in real time management of MH episodes or questions related to specific patients as to their likelihood of developing MH and the optimum management of an episode. MHAUS, similar to other MH patient advocacy organizations is not for profit supported by voluntary contributions. The North American MH Registry supports a patient-specific database with detailed information as to the phenotypic presentations as well as diagnostic test results. The Registry is a subsidiary of MHAUS and is located at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh [205].

The European MH group [134] coordinates testing procedures throughout Europe and is made up of professionals investigating MH. Patient supported MH associations exist in France, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, United Kingdom and several other countries. In South Africa, issues related to MH are subsumed under the Muscular Dystrophy Association of that country. These organizations have been crucial to the education of anesthesia providers in diagnosing and managing MH and helping patients better understand the disorder.

Conclusions

MH remains a serious risk factor for susceptible individuals undergoing general anesthesia using volatile agents. A number of environmental stresses have also been implicated as risk factors in MHS individuals but there is as yet no clear consensus from the literature. While two genes have been unequivocally linked to causation of MH, discordance exists and the potential for the involvement of other genes cannot be discounted. The incidence of death due to MH has decreased in the last thirty years but at the same time the prevalence of genetic variants in the general population has been estimated to be much higher than was originally thought. In addition, unresolved issues including discordance, “awake” MH and the influence of statin therapy suggests that genetic variants previously associated mainly with anesthetic-induced MH may have a much wider range of pathological phenotypes. As a final comment, mortality in MH has been reduced from 80 % to 1.4 % [206] although a recent report shows a further increase [23] so there is still a significant mortality from this disorder and vigilance must be maintained with any anesthetic where triggering drugs are administered.

Footnotes
1

Human RYR1 mutations are numbered according to NP_000531.2, GenBank.

 
2

Porcine RYR1 mutations are numbered according to NP_001001534.1, GenBank.

 

Abbreviations

1B5: 

Cell line isolated from the RYR1 null mouse

ACTA1: 

Gene encoding alpha actin

ATP: 

Adenosine Triphosphate

C: 

Cysteine

Ca2+

Calcium ion

CACNA1S

Gene encoding α1 s subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor

CASQ1

Gene encoding type 1 calsequestrin

CCD: 

Central Core Disease

cDNA: 

Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

CHCT: 

Caffeine Halothane Contracture Test

CIC-1: 

Skeletal muscle chloride channel

CK: 

Creatine Kinase

COS7: 

Cell line derived from the African Green Monkey

DIC: 

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

DHPR: 

Dihydropyridine receptor

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ECCE: 

Excitation-coupled calcium entry

ER: 

Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis

EMHG: 

European Malignant hyperthermia Group

ETCO2

End-tidal Carbon Dioxide

EVS: 

Exome Variant Server

FDA: 

Food and Drug Administration Agency

HEK: 

Human Embryonic Kidney

HGMD: 

Human Gene Mutation Database

I: 

Isoleucine

ICU: 

Intensive Care Unit

IVCT: 

In Vitro Contracture Test

JSPR1

Gene encoding Junctional Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Protein 1 (JP-45)

MDMA: 

3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine

MH: 

Malignant hyperthermia

MHAUS: 

Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States

MHANZ: 

Malignant Hyperthermia Australia and New Zealand

MHN: 

Not susceptible to Malignant hyperthermia

MHS: 

Malignant hyperthermia susceptible

Min: 

minute/s

MmD: 

Multiminicore myopathy

MMR: 

Masseter Muscle Rigidity

MutPred: 

Mutation Prediction

MYH7: 

Gene encoding myosin heavy chain 7

NAMHG: 

North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry

NGS: 

Next Generation Sequencing

NMS: 

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome

OMIM: 

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

Orai1

Gene encoding ORA1 calcium release-activated calcium modulator 1

PolyPhen: 

Polymorphism Prediction

Pmut: 

Pathogen Mutation Prediction

SERCA: 

Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase

SIFT: 

Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant

SOCE: 

Store-operated calcium entry

SNPS&GO: 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Gene Ontology

SR: 

Sarcoplasmic Reticulum

SRP-27: 

Stress response protein 27

R: 

Arginine

RYR1

Gene encoding ryanodine receptor 1

RyR1: 

Ryanodine receptor protein

S: 

Serine

STAC3

Gene encoding the SH3 and cysteine rich domain 3 protein

STIM1

Gene encoding stromal interacting protein 1

T: 

Threonine

TIVA: 

Total intravenous anesthesia

TRPC: 

Transient Receptor Potential Channels

UK: 

United Kingdom

USA: 

United States of America

VUS: 

Variant of Unknown Significance

Y: 

Tyrosine

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None of the authors received funding for this manuscript apart from salaries from their respective employers.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Education and Clinical Research, Saint Barnabas Medical Center
(2)
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Palmerston North Hospital
(3)
Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University

References

  1. Halliday NJ. Malignant hyperthermia. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(5):800–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ording H. Incidence of malignant hyperthermia in Denmark. Anesth Analg. 1985;64(7):700–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Riazi S, Larach MG, Hu C, Wijeysundera D, Massey C, Kraeva N. Malignant hyperthermia in Canada: characteristics of index anesthetics in 129 malignant hyperthermia susceptible probands. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(2):381–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady JE, Sun LS, Rosenberg H, Li G. Prevalence of malignant hyperthermia due to anesthesia in New York State, 2001–2005. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(4):1162–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Strazis KP, Fox AW. Malignant hyperthermia: a review of published cases. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(2):297–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamley D, Pollock NA, Stowell KM, Brown RL. Malignant hyperthermia in infancy and identification of novel RYR1 mutation. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(4):500–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonsalves SG, Ng D, Johnston JJ, Teer JK, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, et al. Using exome data to identify malignant hyperthermia susceptibility mutations. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(5):1043–53.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mauritz W, Hackl W, Winkler M, Sporn P, Steinbereithner K. Anesthesia in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1990;41(2):87–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson RL, Curran JL, Ellis FR, Halsall PJ, Hall WJ, Hopkins PM, et al. Multiple interacting gene products may influence susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Ann Hum Genet. 2000;64(Pt 4):307–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bachand M, Vachon N, Boisvert M, Mayer FM, Chartrand D. Clinical reassessment of malignant hyperthermia in Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(7):696–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibarra MC, Wu S, Murayama K, Minami N, Ichihara Y, Kikuchi H, et al. Malignant hyperthermia in Japan: mutation screening of the entire ryanodine receptor type 1 gene coding region by direct sequencing. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(6):1146–54.Google Scholar
  12. Britt BA. Malignant hyperthermia. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32(6):666–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Litman RS, Flood CD, Kaplan RF, Kim YL, Tobin JR. Postoperative malignant hyperthermia: an analysis of cases from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(5):825–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Larach MG, Allen GC, Brandom BW, Lehman EB. Temperature changes are not late signs of malignant hyperthermia: A NAMH Registry of MHAUS study. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:A374.Google Scholar
  15. Sessler DI. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(2):318–38.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pollock AN, Langton EE, Couchman K, Stowell KM, Waddington M. Suspected malignant hyperthermia reactions in New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30(4):453–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karan SM, Crowl F, Muldoon SM. Malignant hyperthermia masked by capnographic monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1994;78(3):590–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson TE. Porcine malignant hyperthermia: critical temperatures for in vivo and in vitro responses. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(3):449–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fierobe L, Nivoche Y, Mantz J, Elalaoui Y, Veber B, Desmonts JM. Perioperative severe rhabdomyolysis revealing susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(1):263–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McKenney KA, Holman SJ. Delayed postoperative rhabdomyolysis in a patient subsequently diagnosed as malignant hyperthermia susceptible. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(3):764–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann-Horn F, Iaizzo PA. Are myotonias and periodic paralyses associated with susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia? Br J Anaesth. 1990;65(5):692–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Burns AP, Hopkins PM, Hall G, Pusey CD. Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure in unsuspected malignant hyperpyrexia. Q J Med. 1993;86(7):431–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Larach MG, Brandom BW, Allen GC, Gronert GA, Lehman EB. Malignant hyperthermia deaths related to inadequate temperature monitoring, 2007–2012: a report from the North American malignant hyperthermia registry of the malignant hyperthermia association of the United States. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(6):1359–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins PM. Malignant hyperthermia: advances in clinical management and diagnosis. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):118–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bomberg H, Glas M, Groesdonk VH, Bellgardt M, Schwarz J, Volk T, et al. A novel device for target controlled administration and reflection of desflurane--the Mirus. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(11):1241–50.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bosel J, Purrucker JC, Nowak F, Renzland J, Schiller P, Perez EB, et al. Volatile isoflurane sedation in cerebrovascular intensive care patients using AnaConDa® : effects on cerebral oxygenation, circulation, and pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(12):1955–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyer JU, Kullik G, Wruck N, Kuck K, Manigel J. Advanced technologies and devices for inhalational anesthetic drug dosing. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;182:451–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohm KD, Wolf MW, Schollhorn T, Schellhaass A, Boldt J, Piper SN. Short-term sevoflurane sedation using the Anaesthetic Conserving Device after cardiothoracic surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(9):1683–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gonzalez-Rodriguez R, Munoz Martinez A, Galan Serrano J, Moral Garcia MV. Health worker exposure risk during inhalation sedation with sevoflurane using the (AnaConDa®) anaesthetic conserving device. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014;61(3):133–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Johannsen S, Mögele S, Roewer N, Schuster F. Malignant hyperthermia on ICU – sudden attack of the “snake”. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:A11.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz L, Rockoff MA, Koka BV. Masseter spasm with anesthesia: incidence and implications. Anesthesiology. 1984;61(6):772–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazzell VA, Carr AS, Lerman J, Burrows FA, Creighton RE. The incidence of masseter muscle rigidity after succinylcholine in infants and children. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(6):475–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Flynn RP, Shutack JG, Rosenberg H, Fletcher JE. Masseter muscle rigidity and malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in pediatric patients. An update on management and diagnosis. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(6):1228–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Broman M, Islander G, Muller CR, Ranklev-Twetman E. Malignant hyperthermia and central core disease causative mutations in Swedish patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(1):50–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jungbluth H, Sewry CA, Muntoni F. Core myopathies. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2011;18(4):239–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Quinlivan RM, Muller CR, Davis M, Laing NG, Evans GA, Dwyer J, et al. Central core disease: clinical, pathological, and genetic features. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(12):1051–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu S, Ibarra MC, Malicdan MC, Murayama K, Ichihara Y, Kikuchi H, et al. Central core disease is due to RYR1 mutations in more than 90 % of patients. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 6):1470–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jungbluth H. Central core disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:25.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wei L, Dirksen RT. Ryanodinopathies: RyR-Linked Muscle Diseases. Curr Top Membr. 2010;66:139–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ducreux S, Zorzato F, Ferreiro A, Jungbluth H, Muntoni F, Monnier N, et al. Functional properties of ryanodine receptors carrying three amino acid substitutions identified in patients affected by multi-minicore disease and central core disease, expressed in immortalized lymphocytes. Biochem J. 2006;395(2):259–66.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. King JO, Denborough MA. Anesthetic-induced malignant hyperpyrexia in children. J Pediatr. 1973;83(1):37–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. D’Arcy CE, Bjorksten A, Yiu EM, Bankier A, Gillies R, McLean CA, et al. King-denborough syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the ryanodine receptor gene. Neurology. 2008;71(10):776–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dowling JJ, Lillis S, Amburgey K, Zhou H, Al-Sarraj S, Buk SJ, et al. King-Denborough syndrome with and without mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011;21(6):420–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hopkins PM. Malignant hyperthermia: pharmacology of triggering. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(1):48–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jiang D, Chen W, Xiao J, Wang R, Kong H, Jones PP, et al. Reduced threshold for luminal Ca2+ activation of RyR1 underlies a causal mechanism of porcine malignant hyperthermia. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(30):20813–20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sambuughin N, Holley H, Muldoon S, Brandom BW, de Bantel AM, Tobin JR, et al. Screening of the entire ryanodine receptor type 1 coding region for sequence variants associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in the north american population. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(3):515–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bleunven C, Treves S, Jinyu X, Leo E, Ronjat M, De Waard M, et al. SRP-27 is a novel component of the supramolecular signalling complex involved in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling. Biochem J. 2008;411(2):343–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Treves S, Vukcevic M, Griesser J, Armstrong CF, Zhu MX, Zorzato F. Agonist-activated Ca2+ influx occurs at stable plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum junctions. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 23):4170–81.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stamboulian S, Moutin MJ, Treves S, Pochon N, Grunwald D, Zorzato F, et al. Junctate, an inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor associated protein, is present in rodent sperm and binds TRPC2 and TRPC5 but not TRPC1 channels. Dev Biol. 2005;286(1):326–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Woo JS, do Kim H, Allen PD, Lee EH. TRPC3-interacting triadic proteins in skeletal muscle. Biochem J. 2008;411(2):399–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Goonasekera SA, Beard NA, Groom L, Kimura T, Lyfenko AD, Rosenfeld A, et al. Triadin binding to the C-terminal luminal loop of the ryanodine receptor is important for skeletal muscle excitation contraction coupling. J Gen Physiol. 2007;130(4):365–78.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lueck JD, Rossi AE, Thornton CA, Campbell KP, Dirksen RT. Sarcolemmal-restricted localization of functional ClC-1 channels in mouse skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 2010;136(6):597–613.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Missiaen L, Robberecht W, van den Bosch L, Callewaert G, Parys JB, Wuytack F, et al. Abnormal intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and disease. Cell Calcium. 2000;28(1):1–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Golini L, Chouabe C, Berthier C, Cusimano V, Fornaro M, Bonvallet R, et al. Junctophilin 1 and 2 proteins interact with the L-type Ca2+ channel dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(51):43717–25.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee EH, Rho SH, Kwon SJ, Eom SH, Allen PD, Kim do H. N-terminal region of FKBP12 is essential for binding to the skeletal ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(25):26481–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu X, Ghanta J, Walker JW, Allen PD, Valdivia HH. The calmodulin binding region of the skeletal ryanodine receptor acts as a self-modulatory domain. Cell Calcium. 2004;35(2):165–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard TJ, Kranias EG. Junctin and the histidine-rich Ca2+ binding protein: potential roles in heart failure and arrhythmogenesis. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 13):3125–33.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Carpenter D, Ringrose C, Leo V, Morris A, Robinson RL, Halsall PJ, et al. The role of CACNA1S in predisposition to malignant hyperthermia. BMC Med Genet. 2009;10:104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Monnier N, Krivosic-Horber R, Payen JF, Kozak-Ribbens G, Nivoche Y, Adnet P, et al. Presence of two different genetic traits in malignant hyperthermia families: implication for genetic analysis, diagnosis, and incidence of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1067–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Weiss RG, O’Connell KM, Flucher BE, Allen PD, Grabner M, Dirksen RT. Functional analysis of the R1086H malignant hyperthermia mutation in the DHPR reveals an unexpected influence of the III-IV loop on skeletal muscle EC coupling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287(4):C1094–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Protasi F, Paolini C, Dainese M. Calsequestrin-1: a new candidate gene for malignant hyperthermia and exertional/environmental heat stroke. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 13):3095–100.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Dainese M, Quarta M, Lyfenko AD, Paolini C, Canato M, Reggiani C, et al. Anesthetic- and heat-induced sudden death in calsequestrin-1-knockout mice. FASEB J. 2009;23(6):1710–20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Protasi F, Paolini C, Canato M, Reggiani C, Quarta M. Lessons from calsequestrin-1 ablation in vivo: much more than a Ca2+ buffer after all. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2011;32(4–5):257–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Capacchione JF, Sambuughin N, Bina S, Mulligan LP, Lawson TD, Muldoon SM. Exertional rhabdomyolysis and malignant hyperthermia in a patient with ryanodine receptor type 1 gene, L-type calcium channel alpha-1 subunit gene, and calsequestrin-1 gene polymorphisms. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):239–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kraeva N, Zvaritch E, Frodis W, Sizova O, Kraev A, MacLennan DH, et al. CASQ1 gene is an unlikely candidate for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in the North American population. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):344–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Stamm DS, Aylsworth AS, Stajich JM, Kahler SG, Thorne LB, Speer MC, et al. Native American myopathy: congenital myopathy with cleft palate, skeletal anomalies, and susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(14):1832–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Horstick EJ, Linsley JW, Dowling JJ, Hauser MA, McDonald KK, Ashley-Koch A, et al. Stac3 is a component of the excitation-contraction coupling machinery and mutated in Native American myopathy. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1952.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson BR, Wu F, Liu Y, Anderson DM, McAnally J, Lin W, et al. Skeletal muscle-specific T-tubule protein STAC3 mediates voltage-induced Ca2+ release and contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(29):11881–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Polster A, Perni S, Bichraoui H, Beam KG. Stac adaptor proteins regulate trafficking and function of muscle and neuronal L-type Ca2+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(2):602–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Anderson AA, Altafaj X, Zheng Z, Wang ZM, Delbono O, Ronjat M, et al. The junctional SR protein JP-45 affects the functional expression of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel Cav1.1. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 10):2145–55.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Yasuda T, Delbono O, Wang ZM, Messi ML, Girard T, Urwyler A, et al. JP-45/JSRP1 variants affect skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling by decreasing the sensitivity of the dihydropyridine receptor. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(1):184–90.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Robinson R, Carpenter D, Shaw MA, Halsall J, Hopkins P. Mutations in RYR1 in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(10):977–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Fletcher JE, Mayerberger S, Tripolitis L, Yudkowsky M, Rosenberg H. Fatty acids markedly lower the threshold for halothane-induced calcium release from the terminal cisternae in human and porcine normal and malignant hyperthermia susceptible skeletal muscle. Life Sci. 1991;49(22):1651–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Fletcher JE, Tripolitis L, Rosenberg H, Beech J. Malignant hyperthermia: halothane- and calcium-induced calcium release in skeletal muscle. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1993;29(4):763–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Chaube R, Hess DT, Wang YJ, Plummer B, Sun QA, Laurita K, et al. Regulation of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor/Ca2+-release channel RyR1 by S-palmitoylation. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(12):8612–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Andersson DC, Betzenhauser MJ, Reiken S, Umanskaya A, Shiomi T, Marks AR. Stress-induced increase in skeletal muscle force requires protein kinase A phosphorylation of the ryanodine receptor. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 24):6381–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Suko J, Maurer-Fogy I, Plank B, Bertel O, Wyskovsky W, Hohenegger M, et al. Phosphorylation of serine 2843 in ryanodine receptor-calcium release channel of skeletal muscle by cAMP-, cGMP- and CaM-dependent protein kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1175(2):193–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Yuchi Z, Lau K, Van Petegem F. Disease mutations in the ryanodine receptor central region: crystal structures of a phosphorylation hot spot domain. Structure (London, England: 1993). 2012;20(7):1201–11.Google Scholar
  79. Aracena P, Sanchez G, Donoso P, Hamilton SL, Hidalgo C. S-glutathionylation decreases Mg2+ inhibition and S-nitrosylation enhances Ca2+ activation of RyR1 channels. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(44):42927–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Bellinger AM, Reiken S, Carlson C, Mongillo M, Liu X, Rothman L, et al. Hypernitrosylated ryanodine receptor calcium release channels are leaky in dystrophic muscle. Nat Med. 2009;15(3):325–30.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Vita GM, Olckers A, Jedlicka AE, George AL, Heiman-Patterson T, Rosenberg H, et al. Masseter muscle rigidity associated with glycine1306-to-alanine mutation in the adult muscle sodium channel alpha-subunit gene. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(5):1097–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wieland SJ, Fletcher JE, Rosenberg H, Gong QH. Malignant hyperthermia: slow sodium current in cultured human muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1989;257(4 Pt 1):C759–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Duke AM, Hopkins PM, Calaghan SC, Halsall JP, Steele DS. Store-operated Ca2+ entry in malignant hyperthermia-susceptible human skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(33):25645–53.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Gonzalez Narvaez AA, Castillo A. Ca2+ store determines gating of store operated calcium entry in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2007;28(2–3):105–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Yarotskyy V, Dirksen RT. Temperature and RyR1 regulate the activation rate of store-operated Ca2+ entry current in myotubes. Biophys J. 2012;103(2):202–11.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Dirksen RT. Checking your SOCCs and feet: the molecular mechanisms of Ca2+ entry in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 13):3139–47.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Bannister RA, Pessah IN, Beam KG. The skeletal L-type Ca2+ current is a major contributor to excitation-coupled Ca2+ entry. J Gen Physiol. 2009;133(1):79–91.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Wei-Lapierre L, Carrell EM, Boncompagni S, Protasi F, Dirksen RT. Orai1-dependent calcium entry promotes skeletal muscle growth and limits fatigue. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lee KJ, Woo JS, Hwang JH, Hyun C, Cho CH, Kim do H, et al. STIM1 negatively regulates Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal myotubes. Biochem J. 2013;453(2):187–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Eltit JM, Ding X, Pessah IN, Allen PD, Lopez JR. Nonspecific sarcolemmal cation channels are critical for the pathogenesis of malignant hyperthermia. FASEB J. 2013;27(3):991–1000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Brini M, Manni S, Pierobon N, Du GG, Sharma P, MacLennan DH, et al. Ca2+ signaling in HEK-293 and skeletal muscle cells expressing recombinant ryanodine receptors harboring malignant hyperthermia and central core disease mutations. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(15):15380–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Du GG, Oyamada H, Khanna VK, MacLennan DH. Mutations to Gly2370, Gly2373 or Gly2375 in malignant hyperthermia domain 2 decrease caffeine and cresol sensitivity of the rabbit skeletal-muscle Ca2+-release channel (ryanodine receptor isoform 1). Biochem J. 2001;360(Pt 1):97–105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Roesl C, Sato K, Schiemann A, Pollock N, Stowell KM. Functional characterisation of the R2452W ryanodine receptor variant associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Cell Calcium. 2014;56(3):195–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sato K, Pollock N, Stowell KM. Functional studies of RYR1 mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor using human RYR1 complementary DNA. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(6):1350–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Sato K, Roesl C, Pollock N, Stowell KM. Skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia showed enhanced intensity and sensitivity to triggering drugs when expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(1):111–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Yang T, Ta TA, Pessah IN, Allen PD. Functional defects in six ryanodine receptor isoform-1 (RyR1) mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia and their impact on skeletal excitation-contraction coupling. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(28):25722–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Buck ED, Nguyen HT, Pessah IN, Allen PD. Dyspedic mouse skeletal muscle expresses major elements of the triadic junction but lacks detectable ryanodine receptor protein and function. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(11):7360–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Chelu MG, Goonasekera SA, Durham WJ, Tang W, Lueck JD, Riehl J, et al. Heat- and anesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia in an RyR1 knock-in mouse. FASEB J. 2006;20(2):329–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Bannister RA, Esteve E, Eltit JM, Pessah IN, Allen PD, Lopez JR, et al. A malignant hyperthermia-inducing mutation in RYR1 (R163C): consequent alterations in the functional properties of DHPR channels. J Gen Physiol. 2010;135(6):629–40.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Esteve E, Eltit JM, Bannister RA, Liu K, Pessah IN, Beam KG, et al. A malignant hyperthermia-inducing mutation in RYR1 (R163C): alterations in Ca2+ entry, release, and retrograde signaling to the DHPR. J Gen Physiol. 2010;135(6):619–28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Barrientos GC, Feng W, Truong K, Matthaei KI, Yang T, Allen PD, et al. Gene dose influences cellular and calcium channel dysregulation in heterozygous and homozygous T4826I-RYR1 malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(4):2863–76.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. De Crescenzo V, Fogarty KE, Lefkowitz JJ, Bellve KD, Zvaritch E, MacLennan DH, et al. Type 1 ryanodine receptor knock-in mutation causing central core disease of skeletal muscle also displays a neuronal phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(2):610–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Andronache Z, Hamilton SL, Dirksen RT, Melzer W. A retrograde signal from RyR1 alters DHP receptor inactivation and limits window Ca2+ release in muscle fibers of Y522S RyR1 knock-in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4531–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Yang T, Riehl J, Esteve E, Matthaei KI, Goth S, Allen PD, et al. Pharmacologic and functional characterization of malignant hyperthermia in the R163C RyR1 knock-in mouse. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(6):1164–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Zvaritch E, Depreux F, Kraeva N, Loy RE, Goonasekera SA, Boncompagni S, et al. An Ryr1I4895T mutation abolishes Ca2+ release channel function and delays development in homozygous offspring of a mutant mouse line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(47):18537–42.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Malandrini A, Orrico A, Gaudiano C, Gambelli S, Galli L, Berti G, et al. Muscle biopsy and in vitro contracture test in subjects with idiopathic HyperCKemia. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(4):625–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Larach MG, Localio AR, Allen GC, Denborough MA, Ellis FR, Gronert GA, et al. A clinical grading scale to predict malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(4):771–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. A protocol for the investigation of malignant hyperpyrexia (MH) susceptibility. The European Malignant Hyperpyrexia Group. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1984; 56(11):1267–9.Google Scholar
  109. Larach MG, Landis JR, Bunn JS, Diaz M. Prediction of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in low-risk subjects. An epidemiologic investigation of caffeine halothane contracture responses. The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(1):16–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Ording H, Brancadoro V, Cozzolino S, Ellis FR, Glauber V, Gonano EF, et al. In vitro contracture test for diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia following the protocol of the European MH Group: results of testing patients surviving fulminant MH and unrelated low-risk subjects. The European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(8):955–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Allen GC, Larach MG, Kunselman AR. The sensitivity and specificity of the caffeine-halothane contracture test: a report from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry. The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of MHAUS. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(3):579–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Ording H, Bendixen D. Sources of variability in halothane and caffeine contracture tests for susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992;9(5):367–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Islander G, Ranklev TE. Results of in vitro contracture tests for the diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in monozygote twins. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(6):731–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Endo M, Yagi S, Ishizuka T, Horiuti K, Koga Y, Amaha K. Changes in the Ca-induced Ca release mechanism in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of the muscle from a patient with malignant hyperthermia. Biomed Res. 1983;4:83–92.Google Scholar
  115. Bendahan D, Guis S, Monnier N, Kozak-Ribbens G, Lunardi J, Ghattas B, et al. Comparative analysis of in vitro contracture tests with ryanodine and a combination of ryanodine with either halothane or caffeine: a comparative investigation in malignant hyperthermia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(8):1019–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Baur CP, Bellon L, Felleiter P, Fiege M, Fricker R, Glahn K, et al. A multicenter study of 4-chloro-m-cresol for diagnosing malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(1):200–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Johannsen S, Klingler W, Schneiderbanger D, Heiderich S, Roewer N, Schuster F. Sevoflurane is less sensitive than halothane for in vitro detection of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(9):1161–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Payen JF, Bosson JL, Bourdon L, Jacquot C, Le Bas JF, Stieglitz P, et al. Improved noninvasive diagnostic testing for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility from a combination of metabolites determined in vivo with 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(5):848–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Metterlein T, Schuster F, Kranke P, Roewer N, Anetseder M. Minimally invasive metabolic testing for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: a systematic review of the methodology and results. Expert Opinion Medical Diagn. 2010;4(2):149–58.Google Scholar
  120. ClinVar-National Center for Biotechnology Information http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  121. Bevilacqua JA, Monnier N, Bitoun M, Eymard B, Ferreiro A, Monges S, et al. Recessive RYR1 mutations cause unusual congenital myopathy with prominent nuclear internalization and large areas of myofibrillar disorganization. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011;37(3):271–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Duarte ST, Oliveira J, Santos R, Pereira P, Barroso C, Conceicao I, et al. Dominant and recessive RYR1 mutations in adults with core lesions and mild muscle symptoms. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44(1):102–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Ghassemi F, Vukcevic M, Xu L, Zhou H, Meissner G, Muntoni F, et al. A recessive ryanodine receptor 1 mutation in a CCD patient increases channel activity. Cell Calcium. 2009;45(2):192–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhou H, Yamaguchi N, Xu L, Wang Y, Sewry C, Jungbluth H, et al. Characterization of recessive RYR1 mutations in core myopathies. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(18):2791–803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. McCarthy TV, Quane KA, Lynch PJ. Ryanodine receptor mutations in malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Hum Mutat. 2000;15(5):410–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Robinson RL, Brooks C, Brown SL, Ellis FR, Halsall PJ, Quinnell RJ, et al. RYR1 mutations causing central core disease are associated with more severe malignant hyperthermia in vitro contracture test phenotypes. Hum Mutat. 2002;20(2):88–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Stowell KM. DNA testing for malignant hyperthermia: the reality and the dream. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(2):397–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Broman M, Kleinschnitz I, Bach JE, Rost S, Islander G, Muller CR. Next-generation DNA sequencing of a Swedish malignant hyperthermia cohort. Clinical Genetics. 2014. Sep 25. 10.1111/cge.12508.
  129. Kim JH, Jarvik GP, Browning BL, Rajagopalan R, Gordon AS, Rieder MJ, et al. Exome sequencing reveals novel rare variants in the ryanodine receptor and calcium channel genes in malignant hyperthermia families. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(5):1054–65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Schiemann AH, Durholt EM, Pollock N, Stowell KM. Sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing to detect mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(1):122–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Fiszer D, Shaw MA, Fisher NA, Carr IM, Gupta PK, Watkins EJ, et al. Next-generation Sequencing of RYR1 and CACNA1S in Malignant Hyperthermia and Exertional Heat Illness. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):1033–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Rieber N, Zapatka M, Lasitschka B, Jones D, Northcott P, Hutter B, et al. Coverage bias and sensitivity of variant calling for four whole-genome sequencing technologies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66621.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Burke W, Antommaria AH, Bennett R, Botkin J, Clayton EW, Henderson GE, et al. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med. 2013;15(11):854–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. European Malignant Hyperthermia Group http://www.emhg.org. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  135. Anderson AA, Brown RL, Polster B, Pollock N, Stowell KM. Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel ryanodine receptor gene mutation associated with malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(2):208–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Schiemann AH, Paul N, Parker R, Pollock N, Bulger TF, Stowell KM. Functional characterization of 2 known ryanodine receptor mutations causing malignant hyperthermia. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(2):375–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Vukcevic M, Broman M, Islander G, Bodelsson M, Ranklev-Twetman E, Muller CR, et al. Functional properties of RYR1 mutations identified in Swedish patients with malignant hyperthermia and central core disease. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(1):185–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Zullo A, Klingler W, De Sarno C, Ferrara M, Fortunato G, Perrotta G, et al. Functional characterization of ryanodine receptor (RYR1) sequence variants using a metabolic assay in immortalized B-lymphocytes. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(4):E575–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Lefebvre R, Legrand C, Groom L, Dirksen RT, Jacquemond V. Ca2+ release in muscle fibers expressing R4892W and G4896V type 1 ryanodine receptor disease mutants. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54042.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Lyfenko AD, Ducreux S, Wang Y, Xu L, Zorzato F, Ferreiro A, et al. Two central core disease (CCD) deletions in the C-terminal region of RYR1 alter muscle excitation-contraction (EC) coupling by distinct mechanisms. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(1):61–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Klingler W, Baur C, Georgieff M, Lehmann-Horn F, Melzer W. Detection of proton release from cultured human myotubes to identify malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1059–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics / editorial board, Jonathan L Haines [et al.]. 2013;Chapter 7:Unit7 20.Google Scholar
  143. Ferrer-Costa C, Gelpi JL, Zamakola L, Parraga I, de la Cruz X, Orozco M. PMUT: a web-based tool for the annotation of pathological mutations on proteins. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2005;21(14):3176–8.Google Scholar
  144. Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3812–4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Li B, Krishnan VG, Mort ME, Xin F, Kamati KK, Cooper DN, et al. Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2009;25(21):2744–50.Google Scholar
  146. Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Casadio R. Functional annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in proteins. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(8):1237–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Ener RA, Meglathery SB, Van Decker WA, Gallagher RM. Serotonin syndrome and other serotonergic disorders. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass). 2003;4(1):63–74.Google Scholar
  148. Russell T, Riazi S, Kraeva N, Steel AC, Hawryluck LA. Ecstacy-induced delayed rhabdomyolysis and neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a patient with a novel variant in the ryanodine receptor type 1 gene. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(9):1021–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Rosenberg H, Grant M. Ascending tonic-clonic syndrome secondary to intrathecal Omnipaque. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16(4):299–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Larach MG, Rosenberg H, Gronert GA, Allen GC. Hyperkalemic cardiac arrest during anesthesia in infants and children with occult myopathies. Clin Pediatr. 1997;36(1):9–16.Google Scholar
  151. Nathan A, Ganesh A, Godinez RI, Nicolson SC, Greeley WJ. Hyperkalemic cardiac arrest after cardiopulmonary bypass in a child with unsuspected duchenne muscular dystrophy. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(3):672–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Burke W, Pinsky LE, Press NA. Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications. Am J Med Genet. 2001;106(3):233–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Grover S. The psychological dimension of informed consent: dissonance processes in genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2003;12(5):389–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Machini K, Douglas J, Braxton A, Tsipis J, Kramer K. Genetic counselors’ views and experiences with the clinical integration of genome sequencing. J Genet Couns. 2014;23(4):496–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Ulm E, Feero WG, Dineen R, Charrow J, Wicklund C. Genetics Professionals’ Opinions of Whole-Genome Sequencing in the Newborn Period. J Genet Couns. 2014;24(3):452–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Bannister RA. Dantrolene-induced inhibition of skeletal L-type Ca2+ current requires RyR1 expression. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:390493.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Paul-Pletzer K, Yamamoto T, Bhat MB, Ma J, Ikemoto N, Jimenez LS, et al. Identification of a dantrolene-binding sequence on the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(38):34918–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Rubin AS, Zablocki AD. Hyperkalemia, verapamil, and dantrolene. Anesthesiology. 1987;66(2):246–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Malignant Hyperthermia Australia and New Zealand http://www.anaesthesia.mh.org.au/mh-resource-kit/w1/i1002692/. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  160. Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the USA http://www.mhaus.org. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  161. Schuster F, Johannsen S, Roewer N. Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology - Part 3: SOP for malignant hyperthermia. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2013;48(3):162–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Larach MG, Gronert GA, Allen GC, Brandom BW, Lehman EB. Clinical presentation, treatment, and complications of malignant hyperthermia in North America from 1987 to 2006. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(2):498–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Larach MG, Allen GC, Simon A. Safety and efficacy of Dantrolene Sodium for the Treatment of Malignant Hyperthermia Events. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:A1079.Google Scholar
  164. Grunau BE, Wiens MO, Brubacher JR. Dantrolene in the treatment of MDMA-related hyperpyrexia: a systematic review. CJEM. 2010;12(5):435–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Hollander AS, Olney RC, Blackett PR, Marshall BA. Fatal malignant hyperthermia-like syndrome with rhabdomyolysis complicating the presentation of diabetes mellitus in adolescent males. Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 Pt 1):1447–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Brandom BW, Larach MG, Chen MS, Young MC. Complications associated with the administration of dantrolene 1987 to 2006: a report from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(5):1115–23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Gilly H, Weindlmayr-Goettel M, Koberl G, Steinbereithner K. Anaesthetic uptake and washout characteristics of patient circuit tubing with special regard to current decontamination techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36(7):621–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Jones C, Bennett K, Kim TW, Bulger TF, Pollock N. Preparation of Datex-Ohmeda Aestiva and Aisys anaesthetic machines for use in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(3):490–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Bilmen JG, Gillies RI. Clarifying the role of activated charcoal filters in preparing an anaesthetic workstation for malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42(1):51–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Birgenheier N, Stoker R, Westenskow D, Orr J. Activated charcoal effectively removes inhaled anesthetics from modern anesthesia machines. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(6):1363–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Barnes C, Stowell KM, Bulger T, Langton E, Pollock N. Safe duration of postoperative monitoring for malignant hyperthermia patients administered non-triggering anaesthesia: an update. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;43(1):98–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depth of anaesthesia monitors https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg6. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  173. Lerman J, Johr M. Inhalational anesthesia vs total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(5):521–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Denborough MA. Heat stroke and malignant hyperpyrexia. Med J Aust. 1982;1(5):204–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Gronert GA. Dantrolene in malignant hyperthermia (MH)-susceptible patients with exaggerated exercise stress. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(3):905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Gronert GA, Thompson RL, Onofrio BM. Human malignant hyperthermia: awake episodes and correction by dantrolene. Anesth Analg. 1980;59(5):377–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Tobin JR, Jason DR, Challa VR, Nelson TE, Sambuughin N. Malignant hyperthermia and apparent heat stroke. JAMA. 2001;286(2):168–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Brown RL, Pollock AN, Couchman KG, Hodges M, Hutchinson DO, Waaka R, et al. A novel ryanodine receptor mutation and genotype-phenotype correlation in a large malignant hyperthermia New Zealand Maori pedigree. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(10):1515–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Brandom BW, Muldoon SM. Unexpected MH deaths without exposure to inhalation anesthetics in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(9):851–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Gronert GA, Tobin JR, Muldoon S. Malignant hyperthermia: human stress triggering. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813(12):2191–2. author reply 3–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Thomas J, Crowhurst T. Exertional heat stroke, rhabdomyolysis and susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Intern Med J. 2013;43(9):1035–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Groom L, Muldoon SM, Tang ZZ, Brandom BW, Bayarsaikhan M, Bina S, et al. Identical de novo mutation in the type 1 ryanodine receptor gene associated with fatal, stress-induced malignant hyperthermia in two unrelated families. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(5):938–45.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Ellis FR, Green JH, Campbell IT. Muscle activity, pH and malignant hyperthermia. Br J Anaesth. 1991;66(5):535–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Haggendal J, Jonsson L, Carlsten J. The role of sympathetic activity in initiating malignant hyperthermia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990;34(8):677–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Isbister GK, Whyte IM. Serotonin toxicity and malignant hyperthermia: role of 5-HT2 receptors. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(4):603. author reply −4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. Wappler F, Fiege M, Schulte am Esch J. Pathophysiological role of the serotonin system in malignant hyperthermia. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(5):794–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Corona BT, Hamilton SL, Ingalls CP. Effect of prior exercise on thermal sensitivity of malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42(2):270–2.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Yuen B, Boncompagni S, Feng W, Yang T, Lopez JR, Matthaei KI, et al. Mice expressing T4826I-RYR1 are viable but exhibit sex- and genotype-dependent susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia and muscle damage. FASEB J. 2012;26(3):1311–22.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Wappler F, Fiege M, Antz M, Schulte am Esch J. Schulte am Esch J. Hemodynamic and metabolic alterations in response to graded exercise in a patient susceptible to malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(1):268–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Davis M, Brown R, Dickson A, Horton H, James D, Laing N, et al. Malignant hyperthermia associated with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis or congenital abnormalities and a novel RYR1 mutation in New Zealand and Australian pedigrees. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(4):508–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Wappler F, Fiege M, Steinfath M, Agarwal K, Scholz J, Singh S, et al. Evidence for susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia in patients with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(1):95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Grogan H, Hopkins PM. Heat stroke: implications for critical care and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(5):700–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Guis S, Figarella-Branger D, Mattei JP, Nicoli F, Le Fur Y, Kozak-Ribbens G, et al. In vivo and in vitro characterization of skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with statin-induced adverse effects. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(4):551–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Vladutiu GD, Isackson PJ, Kaufman K, Harley JB, Cobb B, Christopher-Stine L, et al. Genetic risk for malignant hyperthermia in non-anesthesia-induced myopathies. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104(1–2):167–73.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Manning BM, Quane KA, Ording H, Urwyler A, Tegazzin V, Lehane M, et al. Identification of novel mutations in the ryanodine-receptor gene (RYR1) in malignant hyperthermia: genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):599–609.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Robinson RL, Anetseder MJ, Brancadoro V, van Broekhoven C, Carsana A, Censier K, et al. Recent advances in the diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: how confident can we be of genetic testing? Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11(4):342–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Heytens L. Molecular genetic detection of susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia in Belgian families. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2007;58(2):113–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Serfas KD, Bose D, Patel L, Wrogemann K, Phillips MS, MacLennan DH, et al. Comparison of the segregation of the RYR1 C1840T mutation with segregation of the caffeine/halothane contracture test results for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in a large Manitoba Mennonite family. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(2):322–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Zhou H, Brockington M, Jungbluth H, Monk D, Stanier P, Sewry CA, et al. Epigenetic allele silencing unveils recessive RYR1 mutations in core myopathies. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(5):859–68.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Robinson RL, Carpenter D, Halsall PJ, Iles DE, Booms P, Steele D, et al. Epigenetic allele silencing and variable penetrance of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(2):220–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Rokach O, Sekulic-Jablanovic M, Voermans N, Wilmshurst J, Pillay K, Heytens L, et al. Epigenetic changes as a common trigger of muscle weakness in congenital myopathies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;27:pii: ddv195. Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  202. Urwyler A, Deufel T, McCarthy T, West S. Guidelines for molecular genetic detection of susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86(2):283–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. I am susceptible to MH http://www.mhaus.org/public/testing/i-am-mh-susceptible-now-what.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  204. Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the USA-FAQS Molecular Genetics http://www.mhaus.org/faqs/molecular-genetics. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  205. North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry http://www.mhreg.org. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  206. Larach MG, Brandom BW, Allen GC, Gronert GA, Lehman EB. Cardiac arrests and deaths associated with malignant hyperthermia in North America from 1987 to 2006: a report from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the malignant hyperthermia association of the United States. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):603–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rosenberg et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement