Skip to main content

Unusual multisystemic involvement and a novel BAG3 mutation revealed by NGS screening in a large cohort of myofibrillar myopathies



Myofibrillar myopathies (MFM) are a group of phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous neuromuscular disorders, which are characterized by protein aggregations in muscle fibres and can be associated with multisystemic involvement.


We screened a large cohort of 38 index patients with MFM for mutations in the nine thus far known causative genes using Sanger and next generation sequencing (NGS). We studied the clinical and histopathological characteristics in 38 index patients and five additional relatives (n = 43) and particularly focused on the associated multisystemic symptoms.


We identified 14 heterozygous mutations (diagnostic yield of 37%), among them the novel p.Pro209Gln mutation in the BAG3 gene, which was associated with onset in adulthood, a mild phenotype and an axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy, in the absence of giant axons at the nerve biopsy. We revealed several novel clinical phenotypes and unusual multisystemic presentations with previously described mutations: hearing impairment with a FLNC mutation, dysphonia with a mutation in DES and the first patient with a FLNC mutation presenting respiratory insufficiency as the initial symptom. Moreover, we described for the first time respiratory insufficiency occurring in a patient with the p.Gly154Ser mutation in CRYAB. Interestingly, we detected a polyneuropathy in 28% of the MFM patients, including a BAG3 and a MYOT case, and hearing impairment in 13%, including one patient with a FLNC mutation and two with mutations in the DES gene. In four index patients with a mutation in one of the MFM genes, typical histological findings were only identified at the ultrastructural level (29%).


We conclude that extraskeletal symptoms frequently occur in MFM, particularly cardiac and respiratory involvement, polyneuropathy and/or deafness. BAG3 mutations should be considered even in cases with a mild phenotype or an adult onset. We identified a genetic defect in one of the known genes in less than half of the MFM patients, indicating that more causative genes are still to be found. Next generation sequencing techniques should be helpful in achieving this aim.


Myofibrillar myopathies (MFM) are a group of phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous neuromuscular disorders. The morphological hallmark of MFM is the presence of protein aggregations in muscle fibres, a focal myofibrillar disorganisation starting at the Z-disk and an ectopic expression of proteins, such as desmin [1]-[6].

Muscle biopsies of MFM patients reveal protein aggregates that are dark blue or purple on the modified Gomori trichrome (mGT) and pink on the haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stains. The aggregations are lacking oxidative enzyme activity on the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH-TR) stains. Other light microscopic findings in MFM are rimmed and non-rimmed vacuoles and sometimes cytoplasmic bodies. At the ultrastructural level, the combination of Z-disk streaming and distinct types of protein accumulations is characteristic for MFM and can even give hints towards the mutated gene [7].

To date, mutations in nine genes are known to cause MFM: desmin (DES) [8], αB-crystallin (CRYAB) [9], myotilin (MYOT, also TTID) [10], filamin C (FLNC) [11], Z-band alternatively spliced PDZ motif-containing protein (ZASP, also LDB3) [12], four and a half LIM domain protein 1 (FHL1) [13], bcl-2 associated athanogene protein 3 (BAG3) [14], dnaJ homolog subfamily B member 6 (DNAJB6) [15] and titin (TTN) [16]. Mutations in exon 343 of the A-band region of TTN were discovered to cause MFM only very recently [16]. Inheritance in MFM is autosomal dominant in most patients, autosomal recessive in rare cases and X-linked in patients with mutations in FHL1. A broad inter- and intrafamilial variability of phenotypes can be seen in MFM. The age at onset of MFM depends on the underlying gene, mutation and inheritance pattern, but usually the disease starts in adulthood [17],[18]. Nevertheless also childhood onsets have been described [8],[13],[14],[19]-[21]. The initial symptom in MFM most frequently is skeletal muscle weakness, other muscular symptoms such as atrophy, hypertrophy, muscle rigidity, contractures, pain or cramps can be present [13],[22]-[26]. Also, the respiratory muscles can be affected in MFM, resulting in a restrictive respiratory insufficiency, which has been reported for most MFM subtypes [4],[8],[11],[14],[27]-[31].

Furthermore, MFM can be associated with distinct multisystemic symptoms, the most frequent being cardiac involvement, ranging from conduction defects and arrhythmias to cardiomyopathies and sudden cardiac death [4],[9],[15],[26],[29],[30],[32]-[38]. The smooth muscles can also be affected in MFM, presenting as chronic diarrhoea or enteric hypomotility [37],[39]-[42], or contributing to bulbar symptoms like swallowing difficulties [27],[28],[31],[33],[37],[43]-[45]. Further symptoms associated with MFM exceed the muscles, such as polyneuropathy (PNP) [10]-[12],[14],[46], cataracts [9],[31],[33], gynaecomastia [29],[47], and hearing impairment [39],[40],[48],[49].

Serum creatine kinase levels (CK) in MFM patients are normal or only slightly elevated. Electromyography (EMG) reveals myopathic or mixed patterns, but also (pseudo-) myotonic discharges can appear [17],[50]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the muscles plays an increasing role in the differential diagnosis of muscular disorders and of MFM in particular [51],[52].

In the present study, we screened a large cohort of 38 unrelated index patients with MFM for mutations in the nine causative genes, employing next generation sequencing (NGS) and traditional Sanger sequencing. We identified a mutation in 14 index patients, including one novel BAG3 mutation. We performed a detailed clinicopathological characterisation in the index patients and five affected relatives and particularly focused on the associated multisystemic symptoms. We highlight new phenotypical findings in MFM and correlate our data with the literature.

Patients and methods


In this study, we included 43 patients with MFM belonging to 38 unrelated families (Figure 1). We selected the MFM cases from the muscle and nerve biopsy archive at the Institute of Neuropathology, and from the Neuromuscular Clinic at the Department of Neurology, at the RWTH Aachen University Hospital (Aachen, Germany). The biopsy of patient F10.1 was also included in the study of Joshi et al. [53]. Additionally, eight index patients/biopsies with MFM were provided by referring centres. The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethical committee of the RWTH Aachen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Figure 1
figure 1

Pedigrees of MFM patients with a confirmed mutation and autosomal dominant inheritance. Index patients are indicated by an arrow; m|n, mutated allele| wildtype allele, indicating all patients who are genetically confirmed heterozygous mutation carriers.

Clinical and paraclinical evaluation

In all 43 patients, we performed a detailed neurological examination, including hearing and swallowing tests, and a blood analysis of the creatine kinase (CK) level. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and electromyography (EMG) studies, heart (electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, long-term ECG) and lung examinations (spirometry/bodyplethysmography) were performed in the majority of patients. In addition, an ophthalmological exam was undertaken in patients with complaints of ocular involvement. An EMG was done in all patients with an identified gene defect, except for patients F5.II.2 and F14.1, a diagnostic muscle MRI of the lower extremities in four patients (F1.III.1, F2.III.4, F10.1, F12.III.3) and a whole-body muscle MRI in one (F7.III.4) (1.5 Tesla, Philips, Intera, Best – the Netherlands).

Light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) of muscle and nerve biopsies

Open muscle biopsies had been obtained from the 38 index patients for diagnostic purposes after written informed consent. The muscle tissue sample was divided into unfixed (cryostat), formaldehyde-fixed (paraffin) and glutaraldehyde-fixed (EM) sections and further prepared according to routine protocols. Standard enzyme histochemical and immunohistochemical stains were applied [54]. For electron microscopy (EM) of muscle tissue, which was performed in 31 out of 38 probands, we used a CM10 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). In addition, seven index patients had simultaneously a diagnostic sural nerve biopsy taken, among them patient F9.1 and F13.1 with a confirmed mutation and a polyneuropathy. The nerve biopsies were processed following standard procedures [55].

Genetic analyses

Peripheral blood samples and a written informed consent for genetic analysis were available from the 38 index patients, as well as from the affected mother of patient F7.IV.2, the affected brother of patient F5.II.2, the cousin of patient F12.III.4 and the son of patient F14.1. Genomic DNA was extracted using standard procedures. We used two different techniques for genetic analyses in our cohort: Sanger sequencing [56] and next generation sequencing (NGS) [57].

Sanger sequencing of the MFM genes

We had started screening a group of 21 MFM index patients with conventional Sanger sequencing before the NGS panel for MFM was established. We analysed DES, CRYAB, MYOT (exon 2 and 9), FLNC (exon 48), ZASP (exon 4–10), FHL1, BAG3 and DNAJB6. We performed PCR using standard protocols and used the BigDye Terminator v1.1 mix (Applied Biosystems) for cycle sequencing reactions according to the instructions in the kit. Sequence data were generated with an ABI 3130xl capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using standard protocols and analysed by GenSearch v.4.0.8 (PhenoSystems, Lillois, Belgium).

NGS panel diagnostics in MFM

In a NGS approach, the coding exons of all causative genes with the exception of the most recently identified TTN gene were sequenced in the additional 17 index patients included in our study: DES (exon 1–9, NM_001927.3), MYOT (exon 2–10, NM_006790.2), ZASP (exons 5–9 of NM_001080116.1 and exons 4, 7, 8 and 10 of NM_007078.2), FHL1 (exon 3–8, NM_001159702.2), BAG3 (exon 1–4, NM_004281.3), DNAJB6 (exon 2–8, NM_005494.2), CRYAB (exon 1–3, NM_001885.1) and FLNC (exon 1–48, NM_001458.3). Furthermore, in 10 index patients of our first cohort in which Sanger sequencing was initially performed (see above) and in which no mutations were identified, we subsequently analysed the complete FLNC gene (exon 1–48) applying NGS. Target enrichment was performed with the Access Array System (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, USA) followed by emulsion PCR and sequence analyses on a GS Junior using kits and instructions by Fluidigm and 454 Life Sciences (Branford, USA). Sequence data were analysed with GenSearch NGS v.1.4 (PhenoSystems, Lillois, Belgium) automatically aligning data to the reference sequences mentioned above. Variants within exons and 20 bp of the flanking intronic sequences were detected with VarScan ( using following filters: coverage >15, frequency >20% for heterozygous or >75% for homo- and hemizygous variants. Candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3130xl automated capillary sequencer using standard protocols, and their effect predicted with bioinformatic tools like PolyPhen-2 (, SIFT ( and MutationTaster ( provided by Alamut (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France).

Sanger sequencing of exon 343 of TTN

Finally, we performed Sanger sequencing to analyse exon 343 of TTN in 25 of our index patients, in whom an underlying gene defect had thus far not been identified (21 patients) or only an unknown variant was revealed (4 patients). PCR, sequencing reaction and data analysis of exon 343 of the TTN gene (NM 001267550.1) have been performed using standard protocols as described above.


Genetic results in our MFM cohort (n = 43): known and novel pathogenic mutations

In 14 index patients, we identified a heterozygous pathogenic mutation in one of the nine genes causing MFM (Table 1), corresponding to a diagnostic yield of 37% in our MFM cohort. In ten patients we found the underlying gene defect using the initial Sanger sequencing study and in four patients by directly employing NGS panel diagnostics. Nine out of the 14 index patients had a positive family history corresponding with an autosomal dominant inheritance (for pedigrees see Figure 1), whereas the others occurred sporadically (Patient F6.1 with a DES mutation, Patient F13.1 with a mutation in BAG3 and all three patients, F9.1, F10.1 and F11.1, with a MYOT mutation, Table 1). We identified six heterozygous mutations in DES, four of these were the Arg350Pro mutation, two different mutations in FLNC, and three MYOT mutations, including two times the Ser60Phe mutation in exon 2. One mutation each was found in ZASP, CRYAB and in BAG3 (Table 1, Figure 1). The mutation in BAG3 represents a novel mutation, whereas the other mutations have been described previously.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of myofibrillar myopathy patients with an identified mutation

The c.626C > A, p.Pro209Gln mutation in exon 3 of BAG3 (Patient F13.1, Table 1) is so far not known in the databases of the NHLBI exome sequencing project (ESP) or the 1000 genome project and was predicted to be disease causing by all used prediction programmes. Further arguments for pathogenicity came from familial segregation analysis, in which both healthy parents did not harbour the mutation, indicating a de novo mutation.

Genetic results in our MFM cohort (n = 43): polymorphisms and unclassified variants

With means of NGS panel diagnostics we found a large number of variants, especially in FLNC. The suspicious variants with a minor allele frequency beneath 1% are listed in Additional file 1. We assessed these variants with various databases and prediction programmes. Especially the pathogenicity of the c.6595G > A, p.Gly2199Arg mutation in exon 40 of FLNC (patient F20.1, Additional file 1) finally remained unclear. This genetic variant has only been counted once by the NHLBI exome sequencing project (ESP) and was predicted to be benign by PolyPhen-2, but disease causing by Mutation Taster. The glycin residue at position c.6595 is highly conserved, as well as the nucleotide at this position. Unfixed muscle tissue of this patient was not available anymore and no new muscle biopsy could be obtained, so that additional proteomic analyses for possible further clarification could not be performed. Moreover, family members were not available for segregation analysis to further clarify the pathogenicity.

Clinical findings in MFM patients with an identified gene defect (n = 14)

The 14 index patients with an identified mutation included eleven males and three females (Table 1). The age at onset ranged from 28 to 69 years (mean 49 years). The most common initial symptom was weakness in the legs (64%). In three patients the first symptom was dyspnoea (21%) and in one syncopes (7%), indicating a respiratory or cardiac onset of the disease. At the time of examination, the disease persisted already up to 32 years (mean disease duration 9 years). Muscle weakness was distributed in the distal and proximal lower limbs, combined with weakness in the proximal upper limbs in six of the 14 patients. Patients F3.II.3 and F6.1 were wheelchair bound since the age of 59 and 60 years respectively, both after 11 years of disease progression. Scapular winging was evident in 29% of the patients, 14% showed additional axial weakness and 14% a ptosis without ophthalmoparesis or facial weakness (Table 1). In 64% of the patients, atrophy of the distal lower limbs was present, among them the two patients with an additional PNP. EMG revealed a myopathic pattern in 58% and a mixed pattern in 42%, in three of the patients with a mixed pattern also pseudomyotonic discharges were present. The serum CK levels varied from normal to 16 fold elevated (mean: 5.5 N) (Table 1). Only patient F14.1 did not show permanent skeletal muscle weakness.

Multisystemic symptoms in the whole MFM cohort (n = 43)

In general, 16% of the patients included in the study (n = 43) had respiratory involvement and 60% presented one or more multisystemic symptom(s) (Table 2). The most striking finding was the large number of MFM patients with mainly a sensorimotor axonal-demyelinating polyneuropathy (12/43 or 28%), which occurred as frequently as cardiac disease (Table 2). In 50% (n = 6) of the MFM patients with a polyneuropathy, no other possible cause was present. However, another 33% (n = 4) suffered from diabetes mellitus and 17% (n = 2) had taken neurotoxic medications, as possible (additional) causes of a polyneuropathy. The PNP was diagnosed after 0–6 years of disease duration (mean: 1.7 years). 14% of the MFM patients suffered from hearing impairment, with a symptom onset between 16 and 80 years of age. Half of these patients used hearing devices. We did not detect diarrhoea, intestinal malabsorption or pseudoobstruction in our cohort.

Table 2 Multisystemic symptoms of all included MFM patients (n = 43)

Multisystemic symptoms in MFM patients with an identified mutation (n = 14 and affected relatives)

In the group of index patients with a pathogenic mutation (n = 14) 64% showed at least one multisystemic symptom (Figure 1, Tables 1 and 2). Patient F3.II.3 harbours the Arg350Pro mutation in DES and presented with exertional dyspnoea as initial symptom at 48 years of age. Subsequently, he developed dyspnoea at rest, had a vital capacity (VC) of 45% of the theoretical value and needed non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation at night. Furthermore, he presented an intermittent tachyarrhythmia absoluta and a hypertrophic left ventricle at echocardiography. He also suffered from bilateral hypacusis and used a hearing aid on the right side since the age of 52 years.

Patient F4.II.2 carried the same Arg350Pro mutation in DES and recognised swallowing problems after six years of disease progression. He also presented a bilateral hypacusis since the age of 38 years.

Only the affected mothers of two more patients with the Arg350Pro mutation in DES (patient F1.III.1; F2.III.4) showed multisystemic symptoms (respiratory insufficiency, cardiac involvement with a pace maker implantation, polyneuropathy).

Patient F6.1 carried the Glu245Asp mutation in DES and exhibited cardiac symptoms: a dilated cardiomyopathy was diagnosed approximately ten years after disease onset and a chronic atrial fibrillation and complete atrioventricular block occurred, necessitating pace maker implantation.

The patient carrying the Ser2Ile mutation in DES (patient F5.II.2) presented with syncopes as the first symptom at the age of 60 years, due to a complete atrioventricular conduction block leading to pace maker implantation. At the age of 65 years, he developed mild distal lower leg weakness and dysphonia. Other causes of dysphonia were excluded. Interestingly, the patient’s father also had dysphonia and a pacemaker implantation at the age of 58 years. The patient’s brother, carrying the same mutation, received a pacemaker at the age of 45 years and had mild distal involvement of the lower legs, but no dysphonia.

Patient F8.III.3 with the Trp2710X mutation in FLNC developed respiratory problems three years before weakness in the extremities occurred. After five years of disease progression, the patient was dependent on non-invasive nocturnal ventilation. VC decreased to 35%.

The affected mother of the index patient harbouring the Val930_Thr933del mutation in FLNC (patient F7.III.4) presented with bilateral hearing impairment and hearing aids at the age of 60 years.

Patient F9.1 carrying the Ser60Phe mutation in MYOT developed exertional dyspnoea due to heart failure at the age of 64 years as the first symptom. A left bundle branch block, an intermittent atrioventricular conduction block and atrial fibrillation were diagnosed, and a pace maker was implanted. The patient also suffered from coronary disease. Four years later, a sensorimotor axonal-demyelinating polyneuropathy was diagnosed.

In Patient F11.1 with a Ser55Phe mutation in MYOT, cardiac symptoms began shortly after skeletal weakness became apparent at the age of 55 years. He had a permanent atrial fibrillation with tachyarrhythmia absoluta and received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In addition, he had several myocardial infarctions due to coronary disease. One year later, a dilated cardiomyopathy was diagnosed and heart transplantation was performed.

Patient F14.1 carries the p.Gly154Ser mutation in CRYAB and presented at the age of 69 years with several episodes of rhabdomyolysis. The patient also complained about exercise intolerance and fatigue. The neurological examination was normal, but a respiratory involvement with a VC of 65% in lying position was diagnosed. His 42-year-old son, carrying the same mutation, was asymptomatic and only showed a moderate serum CK elevation.

MRI findings in MFM patients with an identified mutation

Muscle MRI findings are summarised and compared to the literature in Table 3.

Table 3 MRI findings in five MFM patients with an identified mutation

Histological findings of the MFM cohort

In the 14 index patients with an identified mutation we consistently found an increased variability of fibre diameter (100%), frequent nuclear bags (64%), internal nuclei (86%), vacuoles (64%), rimmed vacuoles (50%) and increased endomysial connective tissue (79%). In 43% of the biopsies, cytoplasmic bodies and core-like lesions on the NADH-TR staining were revealed. Myofibrillar disorganisation was seen in all cases, but characteristic protein aggregations in the cytoplasm of mGT stained fibres were found in only 10 of the 14 cases (71%) (Patient F11.1: in the vastus medialis muscle biopsy protein aggregations were seen, but not in the simultaneously obtained tibialis anterior muscle biopsy). So 29% only showed typical MFM findings at the ultrastructural level (EM was performed in 11 of the 14 cases). Z-disk streaming and myofibrillar disorganisation were seen in 100%, granulofilamentous material in 64%. Abnormal mitochondria (64%), tubulofilamentous accumulations (29%) and cytoplasmic bodies (36%) were other frequent findings. Immunhistochemistry with antibodies directed against desmin showed immunoreactivity in all 8 performed cases.

In the group of 24 patients, in whom the underlying genetic defect had not been identified, we made similar observations. Characteristic protein aggregations in the cytoplasm of mGT stained fibres were found in 76% of the cases, myofibrillar disorganisation in 82%.

In ten of the 12 MFM patients additionally presenting a polyneuropathy, we observed neurogenic muscle atrophy, which found expression in angular shaped muscle fibres and fibre type grouping.

Clinicopathological phenotype of the patient with a novel BAG3 mutation

Patient F13.1 harbours the novel Pro209Gln mutation in BAG3 (Table 1). He presented first symptoms of distal lower limb weakness and symmetrical calve atrophy at the age of 34 years. The skeletal muscle weakness spread to the proximal lower limbs and finally to the proximal upper limbs with scapular winging after 2 more years of disease progression. Moreover, he developed an axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy, as multisystemic symptom of MFM. No other obvious cause for the PNP could be found. The PNP was first diagnosed at the age of 39 years and finds expression in decreased vibration sense and ataxic, clumsy gait as well as an increased sensitivity for cold. EMG showed a mixed pattern and the maximum CK level was 1050 U/L (Table 1). The muscle biopsy showed desmin positive protein deposits, vacuoles and core-like lesions as well as some necrotic fibres. At the ultrastructural level, tubulofilamentous accumulations, lobulated nuclei and glycogen accumulations were seen, in addition to typical MFM findings like Z-disk streaming and the accumulation of granulofilamentous material. We did not observe regenerating fibres or apoptotic nuclei. The ultrastructural study of nerve tissue revealed no giant axons.


In a large cohort of MFM patients, we identified heterozygous mutations in 14 of 38 index patients (diagnostic yield of 37%), including the novel p.Pro209Gln mutation in exon 3 of BAG3, using Sanger and next generation sequencing (NGS) of the nine thus far known causative genes of MFM. Furthermore, we discovered new phenotypes associated with previously described mutations, such as hearing impairment with a FLNC mutation, dysphonia with a mutation in DES and the first patient with a FLNC mutation presenting respiratory insufficiency as the onset symptom. Interestingly, we detected a polyneuropathy in more than a quarter of the MFM patients, including a BAG3 and a MYOT case (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Flowchart of multisystemic symptoms of MFM. Underlined, findings in current study; bold, new findings in current study; *, for the first time described as onset symptom with FLNC mutation in current study; **, for the first time described as onset symptom with p.Ser2Ile DES mutation in current study; † for the first time described with p.Gly154Ser CRYAB mutation in our study; not underlined, literature findings.

Methodological issue: Sanger versus NGS sequencing

In ten of our patients, a mutation in one of the MFM-causative genes was identified using conventional Sanger sequencing. By employing NGS, we additionally found four mutations, among them the novel BAG3 mutation, as well as a lot of variants, especially in FLNC, beyond the mutational hotspot in exon 48. The mass of variants that are found using NGS and their sometimes difficult interpretation can currently still be considered as a drawback of this technique. However, knowledge concerning the variants will increase in the following years as NGS will become more widely available and databases more complete. Advantages of NGS are reduced costs and decreased time to diagnosis. Furthermore, a specific and often unreliable genetic testing sequence is made redundant, especially in diseases with overlapping morphological and/or clinical phenotypes, such as MFM. The difficulty in interpretation of certain variants is illustrated by the unknown variant p.Gly2199Arg in exon 40 of FLNC of patient F20.1 (Additional file 1).

Novel mutation identified in BAG3 and associated phenotype

The novel BAG3 mutation is located at the amino acid position p.209 and proline is replaced by glutamine. At the same position the p.Pro209Leu mutation is situated, which is the most common BAG3 mutation associated with MFM [14],[36],[46],[48]. In all previously described MFM cases with the p.Pro209Leu mutation, the disease started within the first or second decade and was hallmarked by rapidly progressive muscle weakness, severe cardiac and respiratory involvement and early death of the patients in some cases. In nine of the eleven reported cases an axonal polyneuropathy was additionally found. Our patient’s (Patient F13.1, Table 1) mild phenotype with adult-onset skeletal muscle weakness and the absence of cardiac or respiratory involvement clearly differs from the other BAG3-associated MFM cases, solely his axonal sensorimotor PNP is in concordance. Only one other adult-onset patient with BAG3-related MFM has thus far been described: a woman harbouring the p.261-265 RAASP deletion in BAG3, who showed involvement of the orbicularis oculi muscles and the lower limb muscles, as well as photophobia and diplopia, starting at the age of 60 years. Her muscle biopsy revealed typical MFM findings [58].

In our patient’s nerve and muscle biopsy no giant axons could be found, which were described before in BAG3-associated MFM cases [36],[46],[48]. Muscle biopsy findings were typical for MFM. We observed some lobulated nuclei at electron microscopy, corresponding to the findings of Selcen et al. who also described abnormal nuclei up to apoptotic changes in one MFM patient with a BAG3 mutation [14].

Multisystemic symptoms in MFM, unusual phenotypes

We identified new phenotypes considering the multisystemic symptoms of our patients in association with certain mutations in the MFM genes (Figure 2; for review of the literature see Additional file 2). We reported hearing impairment for the first time in patients with the p.Arg350Pro DES mutation and for the first time in combination with a FLNC mutation (p.Val930_Thr933del). Also three other patients of our cohort (Table 2) presented with hearing problems, in one case (unidentified gene defect) the complaints began at the age of 16 years. Hearing impairment as a multisystemic symptom of MFM was described by Kraya et al. in two patients with a ZASP mutation, in a patient harbouring an unknown variant in BAG3 and in one autosomal recessive DES case, as a congenital feature [39],[40],[48],[49].

We moreover present two new onset symptoms: syncopes due to a conduction block associated with the p.Ser2Ile mutation in DES and dyspnoea due to respiratory insufficiency for the first time with a FLNC mutation. In the patient with the DES mutation mild skeletal muscle involvement appeared only after several years. The two reported cases with the same mutation both showed skeletal muscle involvement at baseline [59], so this is the first described pure cardiac onset case associated with this mutation. Moreover dysphonia was noted in the propositus and his father. So far, only dysphagia and nasal voice have been described with DES mutations [27], dysphonia has only been described with CRYAB mutations [31].

Respiratory insufficiency has been described in association with the p.Trp2710X mutation in FLNC, and frequently was the cause of death, but never the initial symptom [11],[30],[60]. It was not reported as an initial symptom in patients with other FLNC mutations, either. Also in patient F14.1 respiratory involvement was diagnosed, which has not been reported before with the p.Gly154Ser mutation in CRYAB[47],[61].

The high frequency of polyneuropathy in our MFM cohort was striking (Table 2). We found PNP in combination with a novel BAG3 and a known MYOT (p.Ser60Phe) mutation (Table 1). Both, BAG3 and MYOT mutations, have been reported in MFM patients who also presented a PNP [10],[14],[46]. Nine additional index patients of our cohort showed evidence for a polyneuropathy, but no mutation was found in these cases. Thus, there probably are other genes which cause a combined phenotype of MFM and polyneuropathy.

The most common cardiac symptoms in our cohort were arrhythmias (83%), followed by conduction defects (50%). This is in accordance with a 10-year longitudinal study in DES patients, in which conduction defects were the most common cardiac manifestation [59].

Taking the whole cohort into account, five patients complained about swallowing problems (one carried a DES p.Arg350Pro mutation).

The occurrence of multisystemic symptoms might be explained by the expression profiles of the proteins encoded by the MFM genes. However, the expression of proteins remains partially unknown, e.g. FLNC expression in the vestibulocochlear nerve.

Muscle MRI findings compared to the literature

For detailed values of the different muscles compared to the literature see Table 3[51]. Patient F1.III.1 and patient F2.III.4 harbour the same mutation in DES (Table 1, Figure 1). Patient F2.III.4 showed an equal pattern of muscle involvement as described before even after 32 years of disease duration. However, the pattern seen in patient F1.III.1 is different, especially his gluteus minimus, quadriceps, and soleus muscle were far more involved than in previously reported cases. Patient F7.III.4 carries a FLNC mutation and showed a relatively typical pattern of muscle involvement in the MRI, only the severe involvement of the rectus femoris and semitendinosus and the spared tibialis anterior muscle was rather unusual. In the patient with a MYOT mutation (patient F10.1) we would have expected the involvement of the tibialis anterior muscle, because of the severely involved posterior compartment, as well as the vastus medialis and intermedius muscles which are described to be one of the most affected in the literature and are only mildly involved here. In the patient with a ZASP mutation (patient F.12.III.3) we found a rather mild involvement at muscle MRI, but as was described before biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscles were most severely affected.


We conclude that multisystemic involvement frequently occurs in MFM. Most important are the cardiac and respiratory symptoms, but also polyneuropathies, hearing loss and bulbar symptoms can occur. BAG3 should be included in the genetic workup of MFM patients, even in cases with an adult onset and a mild phenotype. In 29% of all biopsies no aggregations were found at the light microscopic level, however, typical ultrastructural findings were present, underlining the importance of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of MFM. In contrast, 76% of the patients/biopsies without a genetic identification showed distinct protein deposits in the cytoplasm of the muscle cells. This high rate and our percentage of identified mutations (37%) lead to the conclusion that more causative genes for MFM are still to be found. NGS might be helpful in achieving this aim.

Additional files


  1. De Bleecker JL, Engel AG, Ertl BB: Myofibrillar myopathy with abnormal foci of desmin positivity. II. Immunocytochemical analysis reveals accumulation of multiple other proteins. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996, 55: 563-577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakano S, Engel AG, Waclawik AJ, Emslie-Smith AM, Busis NA: Myofibrillar myopathy with abnormal foci of desmin positivity. I. Light and electron microscopy analysis of 10 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996, 55: 549-562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Selcen D, Ohno K, Engel AG: Myofibrillar myopathy: clinical, morphological and genetic studies in 63 patients. Brain. 2004, 127: 439-451. 10.1093/brain/awh052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olive M, Goldfarb LG, Shatunov A, Fischer D, Ferrer I: Myotilinopathy: refining the clinical and myopathological phenotype. Brain. 2005, 128: 2315-2326. 10.1093/brain/awh576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schroder R, Vrabie A, Goebel HH: Primary desminopathies. J Cell Mol Med. 2007, 11: 416-426. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00057.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Claeys KG, van der Ven PF, Behin A, Stojkovic T, Eymard B, Dubourg O, Laforet P, Faulkner G, Richard P, Vicart P, Romero NB, Stoltenburg G, Udd B, Fardeau M, Voit T, Furst DO: Differential involvement of sarcomeric proteins in myofibrillar myopathies: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol. 2009, 117: 293-307. 10.1007/s00401-008-0479-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Claeys KG, Fardeau M, Schroder R, Suominen T, Tolksdorf K, Behin A, Dubourg O, Eymard B, Maisonobe T, Stojkovic T, Faulkner G, Richard P, Vicart P, Udd B, Voit T, Stoltenburg G: Electron microscopy in myofibrillar myopathies reveals clues to the mutated gene. Neuromuscul Disord. 2008, 18: 656-666. 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.06.367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldfarb LG, Park KY, Cervenakova L, Gorokhova S, Lee HS, Vasconcelos O, Nagle JW, Semino-Mora C, Sivakumar K, Dalakas MC: Missense mutations in desmin associated with familial cardiac and skeletal myopathy. Nat Genet. 1998, 19: 402-403. 10.1038/1300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vicart P, Caron A, Guicheney P, Li Z, Prevost MC, Faure A, Chateau D, Chapon F, Tome F, Dupret JM, Paulin D, Fardeau M: A missense mutation in the alphaB-crystallin chaperone gene causes a desmin-related myopathy. Nat Genet. 1998, 20: 92-95. 10.1038/1765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Selcen D, Engel AG: Mutations in myotilin cause myofibrillar myopathy. Neurology. 2004, 62: 1363-1371. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000123576.74801.75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vorgerd M, van der Ven PF, Bruchertseifer V, Lowe T, Kley RA, Schroder R, Lochmuller H, Himmel M, Koehler K, Furst DO, Huebner A: A mutation in the dimerization domain of filamin c causes a novel type of autosomal dominant myofibrillar myopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77: 297-304. 10.1086/431959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Selcen D, Engel AG: Mutations in ZASP define a novel form of muscular dystrophy in humans. Ann Neurol. 2005, 57: 269-276. 10.1002/ana.20376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Selcen D, Bromberg MB, Chin SS, Engel AG: Reducing bodies and myofibrillar myopathy features in FHL1 muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 2011, 77: 1951-1959. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823a0ebe.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Selcen D, Muntoni F, Burton BK, Pegoraro E, Sewry C, Bite AV, Engel AG: Mutation in BAG3 causes severe dominant childhood muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2009, 65: 83-89. 10.1002/ana.21553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sato T, Hayashi YK, Oya Y, Kondo T, Sugie K, Kaneda D, Houzen H, Yabe I, Sasaki H, Noguchi S, Nonaka I, Osawa M, Nishino I: DNAJB6 myopathy in an Asian cohort and cytoplasmic/nuclear inclusions. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013, 23: 269-276. 10.1016/j.nmd.2012.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohlsson M, Hedberg C, Bradvik B, Lindberg C, Tajsharghi H, Danielsson O, Melberg A, Udd B, Martinsson T, Oldfors A: Hereditary myopathy with early respiratory failure associated with a mutation in A-band titin. Brain. 2012, 135: 1682-1694. 10.1093/brain/aws103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schroder R, Schoser B: Myofibrillar myopathies: a clinical and myopathological guide. Brain Pathol. 2009, 19: 483-492. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00289.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olive M, Odgerel Z, Martinez A, Poza JJ, Bragado FG, Zabalza RJ, Jerico I, Gonzalez-Mera L, Shatunov A, Lee HS, Armstrong J, Maravi E, Arroyo MR, Pascual-Calvet J, Navarro C, Paradas C, Huerta M, Marquez F, Rivas EG, Pou A, Ferrer I, Goldfarb LG: Clinical and myopathological evaluation of early- and late-onset subtypes of myofibrillar myopathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011, 21: 533-542. 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Forrest KM, Al-Sarraj S, Sewry C, Buk S, Tan SV, Pitt M, Durward A, McDougall M, Irving M, Hanna MG, Matthews E, Sarkozy A, Hudson J, Barresi R, Bushby K, Jungbluth H, Wraige E: Infantile onset myofibrillar myopathy due to recessive CRYAB mutations. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011, 21: 37-40. 10.1016/j.nmd.2010.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McLaughlin HM, Kelly MA, Hawley PP, Darras BT, Funke B, Picker J: Compound heterozygosity of predicted loss-of-function DES variants in a family with recessive desminopathy. BMC Med Genet. 2013, 14: 68-10.1186/1471-2350-14-68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Claeys KG, Fardeau M: Myofibrillar myopathies. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013, 113: 1337-1342. 10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00005-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olive M, Goldfarb L, Moreno D, Laforet E, Dagvadorj A, Sambuughin N, Martinez-Matos JA, Martinez F, Alio J, Farrero E, Vicart P, Ferrer I: Desmin-related myopathy: clinical, electrophysiological, radiological, neuropathological and genetic studies. J Neurol Sci. 2004, 219: 125-137. 10.1016/j.jns.2004.01.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gamez J, Armstrong J, Shatunov A, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Dominguez-Oronoz R, Ortega A, Goldfarb L, Ferrer I, Olive M: Generalized muscle pseudo-hypertrophy and stiffness associated with the myotilin Ser55Phe mutation: a novel myotilinopathy phenotype?. J Neurol Sci. 2009, 277: 167-171. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.10.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vattemi G, Neri M, Piffer S, Vicart P, Gualandi F, Marini M, Guglielmi V, Filosto M, Tonin P, Ferlini A, Tomelleri G: Clinical, morphological and genetic studies in a cohort of 21 patients with myofibrillar myopathy. Acta Myol. 2011, 30: 121-126.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmio J, Penttila S, Huovinen S, Haapasalo H, Udd B: An unusual phenotype of late-onset desminopathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013, 23: 922-923. 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.06.374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfeffer G, Barresi R, Wilson IJ, Hardy SA, Griffin H, Hudson J, Elliott HR, Ramesh AV, Radunovic A, Winer JB, Vaidya S, Raman A, Busby M, Farrugia ME, Ming A, Everett C, Emsley HC, Horvath R, Straub V, Bushby K, Lochmuller H, Chinnery PF, Sarkozy A: Titin founder mutation is a common cause of myofibrillar myopathy with early respiratory failure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014, 85: 331-338. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dagvadorj A, Olive M, Urtizberea JA, Halle M, Shatunov A, Bonnemann C, Park KY, Goebel HH, Ferrer I, Vicart P, Dalakas MC, Goldfarb LG: A series of West European patients with severe cardiac and skeletal myopathy associated with a de novo R406W mutation in desmin. J Neurol. 2004, 251: 143-149. 10.1007/s00415-004-0289-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Selcen D, Engel AG: Myofibrillar myopathy caused by novel dominant negative alpha B-crystallin mutations. Ann Neurol. 2003, 54: 804-810. 10.1002/ana.10767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Walter MC, Reilich P, Huebner A, Fischer D, Schroder R, Vorgerd M, Kress W, Born C, Schoser BG, Krause KH, Klutzny U, Bulst S, Frey JR, Lochmuller H: Scapuloperoneal syndrome type Kaeser and a wide phenotypic spectrum of adult-onset, dominant myopathies are associated with the desmin mutation R350P. Brain. 2007, 130: 1485-1496. 10.1093/brain/awm039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kley RA, Hellenbroich Y, van der Ven PF, Furst DO, Huebner A, Bruchertseifer V, Peters SA, Heyer CM, Kirschner J, Schroder R, Fischer D, Muller K, Tolksdorf K, Eger K, Germing A, Brodherr T, Reum C, Walter MC, Lochmuller H, Ketelsen UP, Vorgerd M: Clinical and morphological phenotype of the filamin myopathy: a study of 31 German patients. Brain. 2007, 130: 3250-3264. 10.1093/brain/awm271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sacconi S, Feasson L, Antoine JC, Pecheux C, Bernard R, Cobo AM, Casarin A, Salviati L, Desnuelle C, Urtizberea A: A novel CRYAB mutation resulting in multisystemic disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012, 22: 66-72. 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pruszczyk P, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Shatunov A, Goudeau B, Draminska A, Takeda K, Sambuughin N, Vicart P, Strelkov SV, Goldfarb LG, Kaminska A: Restrictive cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular conduction block resulting from a desmin mutation. Int J Cardiol. 2007, 117: 244-253. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Olive M, Armstrong J, Miralles F, Pou A, Fardeau M, Gonzalez L, Martinez F, Fischer D, Martinez Matos JA, Shatunov A, Goldfarb L, Ferrer I: Phenotypic patterns of desminopathy associated with three novel mutations in the desmin gene. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007, 17: 443-450. 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yuri T, Miki K, Tsukamoto R, Shinde A, Kusaka H, Tsubura A: Autopsy case of desminopathy involving skeletal and cardiac muscle. Pathol Int. 2007, 57: 32-36. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02053.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strach K, Sommer T, Grohe C, Meyer C, Fischer D, Walter MC, Vorgerd M, Reilich P, Bar H, Reimann J, Reuner U, Germing A, Goebel HH, Lochmuller H, Wintersperger B, Schroder R: Clinical, genetic, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in primary desminopathies. Neuromuscul Disord. 2008, 18: 475-482. 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Odgerel Z, Sarkozy A, Lee HS, McKenna C, Rankin J, Straub V, Lochmuller H, Paola F, D'Amico A, Bertini E, Bushby K, Goldfarb LG: Inheritance patterns and phenotypic features of myofibrillar myopathy associated with a BAG3 mutation. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010, 20: 438-442. 10.1016/j.nmd.2010.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hong D, Wang Z, Zhang W, Xi J, Lu J, Luan X, Yuan Y: A series of Chinese patients with desminopathy associated with six novel and one reported mutations in the desmin gene. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011, 37: 257-270. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01112.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hedberg C, Melberg A, Kuhl A, Jenne D, Oldfors A: Autosomal dominant myofibrillar myopathy with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy 7 is caused by a DES mutation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012, 20: 984-985. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ariza A, Coll J, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Lopez MD, Mate JL, Garcia O, Fernandez-Vasalo A, Navas-Palacios JJ: Desmin myopathy: a multisystem disorder involving skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle. Hum Pathol. 1995, 26: 1032-1037. 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90095-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Munoz-Marmol AM, Strasser G, Isamat M, Coulombe PA, Yang Y, Roca X, Vela E, Mate JL, Coll J, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Navas-Palacios JJ, Ariza A, Fuchs E: A dysfunctional desmin mutation in a patient with severe generalized myopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 11312-11317. 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pinol-Ripoll G, Shatunov A, Cabello A, Larrode P, de la Puerta I, Pelegrin J, Ramos FJ, Olive M, Goldfarb LG: Severe infantile-onset cardiomyopathy associated with a homozygous deletion in desmin. Neuromuscul Disord. 2009, 19: 418-422. 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Luan X, Hong D, Zhang W, Wang Z, Yuan Y: A novel heterozygous deletion-insertion mutation (2695–2712 del/GTTTGT ins) in exon 18 of the filamin C gene causes filaminopathy in a large Chinese family. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010, 20: 390-396. 10.1016/j.nmd.2010.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dalakas MC, Dagvadorj A, Goudeau B, Park KY, Takeda K, Simon-Casteras M, Vasconcelos O, Sambuughin N, Shatunov A, Nagle JW, Sivakumar K, Vicart P, Goldfarb LG: Progressive skeletal myopathy, a phenotypic variant of desmin myopathy associated with desmin mutations. Neuromuscul Disord. 2003, 13: 252-258. 10.1016/s0960-8966(02)00271-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Henderson M, De Waele L, Hudson J, Eagle M, Sewry C, Marsh J, Charlton R, He L, Blakely EL, Horrocks I, Stewart W, Taylor RW, Longman C, Bushby K, Barresi R: Recessive desmin-null muscular dystrophy with central nuclei and mitochondrial abnormalities. Acta Neuropathol. 2013, 125: 917-919. 10.1007/s00401-013-1113-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Izumi R, Niihori T, Aoki Y, Suzuki N, Kato M, Warita H, Takahashi T, Tateyama M, Nagashima T, Funayama R, Abe K, Nakayama K, Aoki M, Matsubara Y: Exome sequencing identifies a novel TTN mutation in a family with hereditary myopathy with early respiratory failure. J Hum Genet. 2013, 58: 259-266. 10.1038/jhg.2013.9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jaffer F, Murphy SM, Scoto M, Healy E, Rossor AM, Brandner S, Phadke R, Selcen D, Jungbluth H, Muntoni F, Reilly MM: BAG3 mutations: another cause of giant axonal neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2012, 17: 210-216. 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2012.00409.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Reilich P, Schoser B, Schramm N, Krause S, Schessl J, Kress W, Muller-Hocker J, Walter MC, Lochmuller H: The p.G154S mutation of the alpha-B crystallin gene (CRYAB) causes late-onset distal myopathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010, 20: 255-259. 10.1016/j.nmd.2010.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee HC, Cherk SW, Chan SK, Wong S, Tong TW, Ho WS, Chan AY, Lee KC, Mak CM: BAG3-related myofibrillar myopathy in a Chinese family. Clin Genet. 2012, 81: 394-398. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01659.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kraya T, Kress W, Stoevesant D, Deschauer M, Zierz S: [Myofibrillary myopathy due to the ZASP mutation Ala147Thr: two cases with exclusively distal leg involvement]. Nervenarzt. 2013, 84: 209-213. 10.1007/s00115-012-3689-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hanisch F, Kraya T, Kornhuber M, Zierz S: Diagnostic impact of myotonic discharges in myofibrillar myopathies. Muscle Nerve. 2013, 47: 845-848. 10.1002/mus.23716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fischer D, Kley RA, Strach K, Meyer C, Sommer T, Eger K, Rolfs A, Meyer W, Pou A, Pradas J, Heyer CM, Grossmann A, Huebner A, Kress W, Reimann J, Schroder R, Eymard B, Fardeau M, Udd B, Goldfarb L, Vorgerd M, Olive M: Distinct muscle imaging patterns in myofibrillar myopathies. Neurology. 2008, 71: 758-765. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324927.28817.9b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wattjes MP, Kley RA, Fischer D: Neuromuscular imaging in inherited muscle diseases. Eur Radiol. 2010, 20: 2447-2460. 10.1007/s00330-010-1799-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Joshi PR, Hauburger A, Kley R, Claeys KG, Schneider I, Kress W, Stoltenburg G, Weis J, Vorgerd M, Deschauer M, Hanisch F: Mitochondrial abnormalities in myofibrillar myopathies. Clin Neuropathol. 2014, 33: 134-142. 10.5414/NP300693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dubowitz V, Sewry C: Muscle biopsy a practical approach. Elsevier, Philadelphia 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Weis J, Brandner S, Lammens M, Sommer C, Vallat JM: Processing of nerve biopsies: a practical guide for neuropathologists. Clin Neuropathol. 2012, 31: 7-23. 10.5414/NP300468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG, Brown NL, Coulson AR, Fiddes CA, Hutchison CA, Slocombe PM, Smith M: Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phi X174 DNA. Nature. 1977, 265: 687-695. 10.1038/265687a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vasli N, Laporte J: Impacts of massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2013, 125: 173-185. 10.1007/s00401-012-1072-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sato T, Hayashi YK, Keduka E, Noguchi S, Osawa M, Nonaka I, Nishino I: Novel BAG3 mutations in myofibrillar myopathy patients [abstract]. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011, 21: 740-10.1016/j.nmd.2011.06.1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wahbi K, Behin A, Charron P, Dunand M, Richard P, Meune C, Vicart P, Laforet P, Stojkovic T, Becane HM, Kuntzer T, Duboc D: High cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in myofibrillar myopathies due to DES gene mutations: a 10-year longitudinal study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012, 22: 211-218. 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kley RA, Serdaroglu-Oflazer P, Leber Y, Odgerel Z, van der Ven PF, Olive M, Ferrer I, Onipe A, Mihaylov M, Bilbao JM, Lee HS, Hohfeld J, Djinovic-Carugo K, Kong K, Tegenthoff M, Peters SA, Stenzel W, Vorgerd M, Goldfarb LG, Furst DO: Pathophysiology of protein aggregation and extended phenotyping in filaminopathy. Brain. 2012, 135: 2642-2660. 10.1093/brain/aws200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Pilotto A, Marziliano N, Pasotti M, Grasso M, Costante AM, Arbustini E: alphaB-crystallin mutation in dilated cardiomyopathies: low prevalence in a consecutive series of 200 unrelated probands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 346: 1115-1117. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the personnel of the Institute of Neuropathology and the Department of Neurology at the RWTH Aachen University hospital, Aachen, Germany, for the technical support. We are thankful to Birgit Halliger-Keller of the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, and Phillipp Helbig, for their technical support, as well as to Pauline Lahaut at the Nice University Hospital for her help in collecting patient’s data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristl G Claeys.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

AS carried out the acquisition and interpretation of clinical, histopathological and imaging data, participated in the molecular genetic and histopathological studies and drafted the manuscript. SS was involved in collecting and analysing clinical and histopathological data and revised the manuscript. JEB carried out molecular genetic studies and drafted parts of the manuscript. CL participated in acquisition and interpretation of clinical and histopathological data and revised the manuscript. JB was involved in collecting and analysing clinical data and revised the manuscript. RAK was involved in collecting and analysing clinical data and revised the manuscript. AF participated in collecting and analysing clinical and imaging data and revised the manuscript. RA was involved in collecting and analysing clinical data and revised the manuscript. PVdB was involved in collecting and analysing clinical and histopathological data and revised the manuscript. JJM participated in the acquisition and interpretation of clinical and histopathological data and revised the manuscript. PDJ was involved in collecting clinical data and revised the manuscript. ENJ participated in collecting and analysing of histopathological data and revised the manuscript. OM participated in the acquisition and interpretation of clinical data and revised the manuscript. MD participated in collecting and analysing of clinical and imaging data and revised the manuscript. MB participated in collecting and interpretation of clinical data and revised the manuscript. JMS participated in the acquisition and interpretation of histopathological data and revised the manuscript. MV participated in collecting and analysing of clinical and histopathological data and revised the manuscript. JBS participated in the acquisition and interpretation of clinical data and revised the manuscript. JW participated in the acquisition and interpretation of histopathological data and revised the manuscript. WK carried out the molecular genetic studies and drafted and revised the manuscript. KGC conceived, coordinated and supervised the study, participated in the collection and analysing of the clinical, histopathological, imaging and genetic data, and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1:Non-pathogenic or unclassified variants identified by means of NGS panel diagnostics in the MFM-causing genes.(PDF 19 KB)

Additional file 2:Review of multisystemic symptoms described in literature.(PDF 199 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semmler, AL., Sacconi, S., Bach, J.E. et al. Unusual multisystemic involvement and a novel BAG3 mutation revealed by NGS screening in a large cohort of myofibrillar myopathies. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9, 121 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: