Open Access

Brain–blood amino acid correlates following protein restriction in murine maple syrup urine disease

  • Kara R Vogel1,
  • Erland Arning2,
  • Brandi L Wasek2,
  • Sterling McPherson3,
  • Teodoro Bottiglieri2 and
  • K Michael Gibson1Email author
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20149:73

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-9-73

Received: 19 February 2014

Accepted: 25 April 2014

Published: 8 May 2014

Abstract

Background

Conventional therapy for patients with maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) entails restriction of protein intake to maintain acceptable levels of the branched chain amino acid, leucine (LEU), monitored in blood. However, no data exists on the correlation between brain and blood LEU with protein restriction, and whether correction in blood is reflected in brain.

Methods

To address this question, we fed intermediate MSUD mice diets of 19% (standard) and 6% protein, with collection of sera (SE), striata (STR), cerebellum (CE) and cortex (CTX) for quantitative amino acid analyses.

Results

LEU and valine (VAL) levels in all brain regions improved on average 28% when shifting from 19% to 6% protein, whereas the same improvements in SE were on average 60%. Isoleucine (ILE) in brain regions did not improve, while the SE level improved 24% with low-protein consumption. Blood-branched chain amino acids (LEU, ILE, and VAL in sera (SE)) were 362-434 μM, consistent with human values considered within control. Nonetheless, numerous amino acids in brain regions remained abnormal despite protein restriction, including glutamine (GLN), aspartate (ASP), glutamate (GLU), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), asparagine (ASN), citrulline (CIT) and serine (SER). To assess the specificity of these anomalies, we piloted preliminary studies in hyperphenylalaninemic mice, modeling another large neutral aminoacidopathy. Employing an identical dietary regimen, we found remarkably consistent abnormalities in GLN, ASP, and GLU.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that blood amino acid analysis may be a poor surrogate for assessing the outcomes of protein restriction in the large neutral amino acidopathies, and further indicate that chronic neurotransmitter disruptions (GLU, GABA, ASP) may contribute to long-term neurocognitive dysfunction in these disorders.

Keywords

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) Branched-chain keto-acid dehydrogenase (BCKDH) complex Mouse model Large neutral amino acid transporter (LAT-1) Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) Phenylketonuria (PKU) Large neutral aminoacidopathies Dietary protein restriction

Background

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD; branched chain ketoacid dehydrogenase (BCKDH) deficiency) and phenylketonuria (PKU) comprise the large neutral aminoacidopathies. Untreated MSUD results in accumulation of the branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) leucine (LEU), valine (VAL) and isoleucine (ILE) [14]. Additionally, induction of catabolism will induce release of BCAAs from muscle and increase the BCAA’s corresponding α-keto acids (BCKAs), including α-ketoisocaproate (KIC, from LEU), α-keto-β-methylvalerate (KMV, from ILE) and α-ketoisovalerate (KIV, from VAL), all of which can freely traverse the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and transaminate to yield the corresponding BCAAs [5]. Treatment of MSUD requires strict protein restriction combined with BCAA supplementation to levels compatible with adequate development and growth. Although dietary intervention prevents the severe developmental delays associated with chronic hyperleucinemia, it nonetheless presents challenges that include maintenance and adherence to diet, and mounting evidence for long-term deficits in neurocognition despite acceptable metabolic control determined in blood [616]. Additionally, over restriction of dietary amino acid intake may have untoward consequences. The preceding discussion suggests that while prudent, dietary treatment alone for MSUD may be suboptimal.

The pathophysiology of MSUD has been extensively reviewed [17]. Episodic increases in blood BCAAs occur when muscle degrades protein in response to physiological stress [1820], also increasing the level of corresponding BCKAs. Increased muscle BCKAs induces reversal of cytosolic transaminases and depletes tissue levels of other amino acid nitrogen donors. As LEU exits muscle and other tissues via the large neutral amino acid transporter (LAT-2) [21], heteroexchange mechanisms stoichiometrically drive import of other amino acids and increase the relative LEU blood concentration. At the BBB, elevated BCAAs may saturate the LAT-1 (see below) transporter and block uptake of other large neutral amino acids (LNAA; including phenylalanine (PHE), tyrosine (TYR), methionine (MET); tryptophan (TRP); and histidine (HIS)). Increased blood BCKAs enter the brain via the monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) and reverse flux through cerebral transaminases, depleting brain glutamate (GLU), glutamine (GLN) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (among others), while enhancing production of LEU and α-ketoglutarate [5, 2225]. These disruptions in brain amino acid homeostasis may also be accompanied by disruptions of oxidative phosphorylation, elevated cerebral lactate level and oxidative damage [20, 26].

As noted above, LNAAs cross the BBB on the LAT-1 transporter, and accumulation of offending amino acids such as the BCAAs in MSUD can result in exclusion of other LNAAs from the brain, although this has not been rigorously evaluated in either patients or an animal model of MSUD. Despite the specificity of the LAT-1 for LNAAs, most brain amino acid transport systems display broad overlap in the amino acids transported [3, 4, 27, 28]. Here, we have employed a murine model of MSUD to address the question of whether control of BCAA level, as monitored in blood, is reflected by similar correction in the brain. Several novel therapeutic approaches to PKU have emerged recently [29], yet with the exceptions of phenylbutyrate administration (which selectively lowers circulating BCAAs) [30] or orthotopic liver transplantation for the most severe forms of MSUD [8, 15, 31, 32], few therapeutic advances have emerged in MSUD. The current report addresses our hypothesis, and for the first time verifies in a murine model of MSUD that assessment of metabolic control using blood studies is a poor surrogate for disturbances of amino acid homeostasis in the brain.

Methods

Animal subjects

The intermediate MSUD murine model (imsud mice) has been described, and manifests ~ 6% of residual BCKDH enzyme function [1, 2, 33, 34]. Animal subjects were genotyped by PCR amplification. Subjects of both genders were employed, ages 10–20 days of life. Subjects were allowed ad libitum access to chow and water throughout experimentation. All animal experimentation was performed with IACUC approval (ASAF 4232–007).

Diets employed

We performed pilot studies with the Teklad TD.90016 diet (6.9% casein = 6% protein; low protein) since it has been employed previously for maternal protein restriction in rodents [35]. In the latter studies, the induction of serine-metabolizing enzymes was characterized in mice receiving 2, 6 and 18% protein. Based upon empiric considerations, we felt that 2% protein would be too stringent in imsud mice and lead to catabolic crisis. Teklad custom diets are isocaloric and balanced for nitrogen level. The corresponding Teklad TD.91353 diet (19% protein) was used as control diet. Animals were on diet for 8–18 days prior to sacrifice. Power analyses indicated that n = 6 subjects of each genotype (imsud +/+ and imsud -/- ) would be sufficient to obtain statistically significant outcomes. For brain region analyses (see below), we frequently had n = 5-6 subjects per diet and genotype, but the smaller size of mutant subjects often led to insufficient blood for analytical studies, thereby leading to smaller n values for sera (SE) and enhanced data variability. At study conclusion, subjects per genotype were n = 3-7 for SE and n = 4-8 for brain.

Tissue harvesting and analytical methodology

At appropriate time points, animal subjects were euthanized, and blood collected by cardiac puncture. The brain cavity was rapidly accessed on an ice-cold glass plate, with parietal cortex (CTX), striata (STR), and cerebellum (CB) rapidly excised. Harvested tissues and sera following centrifugation were stored at – 80°C until analyses. LNAAs and other amino acids were determined with an ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) MassTrak amino acid system as previously described [36]. All values in SE are presented in units of μmol/L, wherease all values in brain regions are presented in units of nmol/gr tissue.

Statistical analyses

In prior studies, we had observed depletion of GLU, GLN, ASP, serine (SER), alanine (ALA) and GABA, with elevated glycine (GLY) in brain of imsud mice. However, those studies were performed in whole brain [1, 2, 33, 34], potentially leading to artifact from mixing of regions with high vs. low metabolite levels. In the current study we assessed discrete brain regions. Accordingly, we had no insight whether to expect brain regional amino acids to be constant or different. Thus, we initially employed a two-way ANOVA to assess correlations between brain region and protein intake, and interaction of these parameters, accompanied by a Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. Our primary statistical analyses employed a two-tailed t test within genotype as a function of protein consumption. Both statistical evaluations are presented in all figure legends. Comparisons of amino acid concentrations between blood and brain assumed a density of brain tissue of ~1 g/ml [37].

Results

For imsud mice, all BCAAs were significantly increased in comparison to littermate controls, verifying the utility of the model (Figure 1). With decreased protein consumption, LEU in mutant SE decreased from 1072 (504) (standard deviation shown in parenthesis after mean) to 436 (107) μmol/L, while the same decreases in mutant were 1026 (444) to 723 (415) in CB, 1147 (535) to 853 (648) in STR and 1017 (516) to 755 (452) in CTX (brain regions: nmol/gr tissue). ILE changes in mutant mice with decreased protein were 488 (115) to 362 (41) μmol/L in SE, 555 (84) to 585 (226) in CB, 625 (132) to 687 (349) in SE and 583 (126) to 636 (235) in cortex (nmol/gr tissue). For VAL, comparable changes were 1007 (441) to 434 (71) μmol/L in SE, 950 (347) to 651 (288) in CB, 1071 (421) to 758 (453) in STR and 894 (448) to 661 (351) in CTX (nmol/gr tissue).
Figure 1

Branched chain amino acids in sera (SE), cerebellum (CB), striata (STR) and cortex (CTX) as a function of protein intake (6 or 19%) and genotype (w, wild-type; m, mutant). Two-way ANOVA (parameters: protein intake, tissue), p = ns for tissue and interaction, p < 0.05 for protein intake. Two-tailed t-test, p < 0.05 for all mutant vs. wild-type (not shown).

Within tissues (SE, CB, STR and CTX), there was no significant improvement in BCAAs with lowered protein intake, although the trend in SE BCAAs approached significance (t- test, 2-tailed, p = 0.074-0.125 vs. CB, STR and CTX, p = 0.210-0.789), but variation in SDs (occasional low SE quantity for selected animals) was problematic. Alloisoleucine (ALLO, a pathognomonic biomarker for MSUD) showed similar trends (Figure 2). The changes for ALLO in mutants with decreased protein consumption were 39 (22) to 12 (3) μmol/L in SE, 66 (37) to 37 (24) in CB, 75 (44) to 44 (31) in STR, and 41 (29) to 27 (15) in CTX (brain values, nmol/gr protein). As expected, ALLO was undetectable in wild-type mice with either diet. There was no significant difference in any tissue with decreased protein intake for ALLO in mutant mice.
Figure 2

Alloisoleucine levels (see Figure1for details). Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for protein intake, p = ns for tissue and interaction. Two-tailed t-test, p = ns between mutant and wild-type as a function of protein intake.

We then turned our attention to the other LNAAs (MET, PHE, TYR and TRP) in the same regions (Figure 3). For TYR, changes for mutant mice with decreased protein intake were 94 (19) to 134 (10) μmol/L in SE, 98 (13) to 143 (44) in CB, 57 (n = 2)-92 (26) in striata and 102 (17) to 139 (46) in CTX (brain, nmol/gr tissue). For TRP, the same values for mutant were 49 (5) to 57 (12) μmol/L in SE, 28 (4) to 31 (8) in CB, 28 (7) to 32 (10) in STR and 25 (4) to 26 (9) in CTX. For MET, these values were 77 (16) to 82 (27) μmol/L in SE, 132 (41) to 93 (29) in CB, 121 (40) to 113 (28) in STR and 146 (11) to 143 (29) in CTX. For PHE, the corresponding values were 94 (15) to 86 (19) μmol/L in SE, 104 (13) to 118 (13) in CB, 99 (17) to 124 (41) in STR and 100 (12) to 101 (14) in CTX (nmol/gr tissue).
Figure 3

Other large neutral amino acids (tyrosine, tryptophan, methionine, phenylalanine) as a function of protein intake and genotype (see Figure1for details). Two-tailed ANOVA, p < 0.05 for both protein intake, tissue and interaction. Two-tailed t-test (*p < 0.05), comparing M19 and W19 in CTX and CB (TYR) and STR (TRP). Also, p < 0.05 for TYR in SE (M6 vs M19).

Elevated BCAA levels had no substantial effect on TRP, MET and PHE levels in any brain region, although SE TYR was improved (increased in mutant mice; Figure 3) with decreased protein consumption (without a corresponding correction in brain regions). This finding lends credence to the hypothesis that correction of blood amino acid content may not reflect corresponding corrections in brain. Conversely, compared to control mice receiving identical diet, levels of TYR or TRP were depleted in CB, STR and CTX with high protein intake, but these depletions were not consistent across different brain regions (Figure 3).

We next surveyed all remaining physiological amino acids across brain regions, and observed significant abnormalities in GLN, ASP, GLU, GABA, ASN (asparagine); CIT (citrulline), SER and ALA (Figures 4, 5 and 6). For comparison purposes, concentrations for GLN, ASP and GLU are not depicted for SE because of the much higher brain levels, which would graphically dwarf SE values, and GABA is not quantifiable in SE. Changes in GLN in mutant brain regions with decreased protein consumption were 2590 (726) to 3021 (477) in CB, 1575 (516) to 2342 (503) in STR and 1862 (739) to 2064 (336) in CTXD (nmol/gr tissue). For ASP, the same changes with decreased protein were 1818 (303) to 2206 (420) in CB, 1662 (517) to 1829 (183) in STR and 1808 (420) to 2021 (187) in CTX; for GLU, 4973 (774) to 5045 (1263) in CB, 6238 (1264) to 6554 (407) in STR and 7019 (1226) to 7246 (134) in CTX; and for GABA, 1920 (207) to 2317 (378) in CB, 1958 (316) to 2364 (409) in STR and 2595 (171) to 2789 (329) in CTX (nmol/gr tissue).
Figure 4

Neurotransmitter amino acids (glutamine, aspartate, glutamate and GABA) as a function of protein intake and tissue (see Figure1Legend). Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for tissue, protein intake and interaction. Two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05 for all mutant vs. wild-type under both protein intake regimens.

Figure 5

Asparagine and citrulline level as a function of protein intake and tissue. Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for protein intake and interaction, p = ns for tissue. Two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05 between genotype with identical protein intake.

Figure 6

Serine and alanine levels as a function of protein intake and tissue. Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for protein intake, tissue and interaction. Two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05 for genotype with identical protein intake.

With the exception of GABA (which improved with lower protein intake), GLN, ASP and GLU were not improved with lowered protein consumption (Figure 4). Conversely, lowered protein intake normalized the level of ASN in CB and the concentration of CIT in STR and CTX, while both amino acids were significantly increased vs. control during high-protein intake (Figure 5). Similar findings were observed for SER and ALA, in which correction with lowered protein consumption was observed in CB, but not in STR or CTX (Figure 6). Threonine (THR) is often considered a member of the LNAA subgroup, but we found no consistent changes in brain regions, with the exception of a single instance in striata (Figure 7). Conversely, LYS is not considered a LNAA, yet its values were significantly impacted during high-protein consumption (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Threonine and lysine levels as a function of protein intake and tissue. Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for protein intake, tissue and interaction. Two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05 for genotype with identical protein intake.

Since concentrations of several amino acids are much lower in SE vs. brain regions (e.g., Figures 1, 2, and 3), we did not present them graphically, as noted above. We observed no significant changes for GLU and GLN in SE (p > 0.05), yet found brain disruptions that were uncorrected with lowered protein intake (Figure 4). Conversely, in SE we observed a significant difference for ASP (19% diet: imsud -/- , 59 ± 17 (n = 5) vs. imsud +/+ , 104 ± 21 (n = 7) (p < 0.05), which corrected with 6% diet (imsud -/- , 78 ± 37 (n = 3) vs. imsud +/+ , 136 ± 90 (n = 5) (p = ns). ASN in SE was within normal limits for imsud subjects, despite significant alterations in brain. For CIT, elevations in SE approximated those seen in brain regions (data not shown). SER levels in SE were not abnormal in mutant mice (although they were disrupted in brain regions; Figure 6). Conversely, disruptions of ALA levels in SE mirrored the abnormalities observed in brain (data not shown). Of interest, abnormalities of LYS in SE mirrored the disruptions observed in brain (Figure 7), especially in the instance of high-protein intake, perhaps suggesting that some portion of LYS is trafficked on the large-neutral amino acid transporter.

Depletion of brain GLN, GLU and GABA have been suggested to associate with transamination via accumulated KIC in brain [5]. Accordingly, we predicted that Pah enu2 mice (representing the large neutral aminoacidopathy PKU [3, 4]) would have normal GLN, GLU and GABA since KIC is not elevated in this disorder. To address this hypothesis, we developed cohorts of Pah enu2-/- mice and parallel controls and fed them diets identical to those given to imsud mice. We first verified the utility of our PKU model through quantitation of brain PHE levels, which was significantly increased (and not corrected even with 6% protein intake; Figure 8). Unexpectedly, alterations in brain regions for ASP, GLN and GLU in Pah enu2-/- mirrored those observed in imsud mice (Figure 9). These changes in Pah enu2-/- mice with decreased protein intake were: GLN: 3675 (381) to 4500 (258) in CB, 1964 (261) to 2308 (208) in STR and 1557 (280) to 1876 (297) in CTX (nmol/gr tissue); ASP: 2468 (443) to 2335 (98) in CB, 1758 (293) to 1661 (109) in STR and 2216 (456) to 2044 (306) in CTX; CLU: 6781 (559) to 6833 (320) in CB, 6041 (461) to 5777 (363) in STR and 6427 (810) to 6164 (637) in CTX; GABA: 2152 (279) to 2470 (283) in CB, 1735 (264) to 1470 (168) in STR and 2304 (233) to 2271 (308) in CTX (all nmol/gr tissue). The striking similarity in abnormalities between imsud -/- and Pah enu2-/- mice in different regions of the brain, as a function of protein intake (Figure 9), suggests that other factors, in addition to brain keto-acid accumulation, may be at play in the brains of animals with large neutral aminoacidopathies, and most likely in patients as well.
Figure 8

Phenylalanine levels as a function of protein intake and tissue in phenylketonuric mice. Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for protein intake, tissue and interaction. All values in mutant mice were significantly increased in comparison to control mice (p < 0.05, two tailed t-test; not shown on graph).

Figure 9

Glutamine, aspartate, glutamate and GABA as a function of protein intake and tissue in phenylketonuric (PKU) mice. Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05 for tissue, protein intake and interaction. Two-tailed t-test, *p < 0.05 for mutant vs. wild-type. Note: For GABA in CTX, GABA was also significantly decreased in mutant vs. wild-type mice. In only a single instance did lower protein result in significant correction between mutant populations (GLN in CB).

Discussion

The range of means for BCAAs in SE of imsud mice receiving 6% dietary protein was 362-434 μM (Figure 1), consistent with the range of LEU for 13 intermediate MSUD patients under dietary intervention (379 ± 147 μM; [38]) and 282 ± 277 μM for classical MSUD patients [5] considered to be under “metabolic control”. Based on these human data, 6% protein consumption normalized blood BCAAs, yet we observed significant disruption of several other amino acids in the brain despite apparent metabolic control manifested in SE. We hypothesized that reduced levels of GLN, GLU, GABA and ALA in brain regions might be partially explained by KIC accumulation ([5]; see Figures 4 and 6; not measured in the current study), yet similar anomalies in PKU mice argues against this hypothesis (Figure 9). CIT accumulation in imsud brain regions likely reflects depletion of ASP, the latter necessary for condensation with CIT to form argininosuccinate within the urea cycle.

The original studies of Pardridge and Oldendorf [39] in the rat indicated that PHE, TRP, MET, TYR, LEU, ILE, VAL and HIS were transported into the brain on the LAT-1, with Km values ranging from ~ 25 to 200 μM (highest affinity, PHE; lowest affinity HIS). Limited data suggests that THR and LYS may also traffic on LAT-1 [3, 4, 40, 41], yet we found no evidence for disrupted THR levels. Conversely, we did detect decreased LYS in brain regions of imsud subjects. LYS would be expected to be transported predominantly via the B transporter [3], although there is considerable redundancy in many of the blood–brain transporters.

Long-term neurocognitive deficits are observed in MSUD, even with acceptable metabolic control (as determined in blood), and both animal and human data suggests that these deficits correlate with exclusion of the monoamine precursors TYR and TRP from the brain due to chronic elevations of BCAAs [1, 2, 25, 33, 34]. While our studies revealed significant effects on brain TYR with diet in imsud subjects, we found no consistent effect on TRP (although we did not quantify monoamine neurotransmitters). Alternatively, our data supports the premise that long-term neurocognitive deficits in MSUD patients may also correlate with depletion of amino acid neurotransmitters (ASP, GLU and GABA). Based upon the preliminary studies in the current report, our next objectives are to investigate LEU-depleted diets in imsud -/- mice that are appropriately supplemented with ILE and VAL, a diet corresponding to that used in MSUD patients, and to again investigate the amino acid outcomes both regionally in brain and blood. Such studies will yield a better overview of the expected outcomes for a diet more closely resembling that utilized in the clinic. The main conclusions drawn from the current report include:

  • The first detailed cross-correlation assessment of amino acids in brain and blood, as a function of total protein intake, and the first analysis of amino acids in discrete regions of the brain of imsud mice, including cerebellum, cortex and striata

  • A clear demonstration that blood amino acid analysis, and the assignment of metabolic control with respect to BCAA levels, represents only a partial picture of brain amino acid homeostasis

These results further support the concept that dietary intervention in MSUD is likely to be insufficient to avoid neurocognitive deficiencies in patients, underscoring the urgent need for more focused therapeutics in MSUD.

Abbreviations

SE: 

Sera

CB: 

Cerebellum

STR: 

Striata

CTX: 

cortex

W6: 

Wild-type mice receiving 6% protein intake

M6: 

Mutant mice receiving 6% protein intake

W19: 

Wild-type mice receiving 19% protein intake

M19: 

Mutant mice receiving 19% protein intake

imsud-/-: 

Intermediate maple syrup urine disease mice

Pahenu2-/-: 

Phenylketonuric mice

LEU: 

Leucine

ILE: 

Isoleucine

VAL: 

Valine

ALLO: 

Allosisoleucine

SER: 

Serine

CIT: 

Citrulline

THR: 

Threonine

ALA: 

Alanine

LYS: 

Lysine

HIS: 

Histidine

GLN: 

Glutamine

ASP: 

Aspartate

GLU: 

Glutamate

GABA: 

4-aminobutyrate

PHE: 

Phenylalanine

TYR: 

Tyrosine

MET: 

Methionine

TRP: 

Tryptophan

ASN: 

Asparagine.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

KRV and KMG gratefully acknowledge partial support from NIH HD58553, NS82286, the National PKU Alliance, and a Pre-Doctoral Award from the American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Experimental and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University
(2)
Institute of Metabolic Disease and Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
(3)
College of Nursing, Washington State University

References

  1. Skvorak KJ, Dorko K, Marongiu F, Tahan V, Hansel MC, Gramignoli R, Arning E, Bottiglieri T, Gibson KM, Strom SC: Improved amino acid, bioenergetic metabolite and neurotransmitter profiles following human amnion epithelial cell transplant in intermediate maple syrup urine disease mice. Mol Genet Metab. 2013, 109: 132-138. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Skvorak KJ, Dorko K, Marongiu F, Tahan V, Hansel MC, Gramignoli R, Gibson KM, Strom SC: Placental stem cell correction of murine intermediate maple syrup urine disease. Hepatology. 2013, 57: 1017-1023. 10.1002/hep.26150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Vogel KR, Arning E, Wasek BL, Bottiglieri T, Gibson KM: Non-physiological amino acid (NPAA) therapy targeting brain phenylalanine reduction: pilot studies in PAHENU2 mice. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013, 36: 513-523. 10.1007/s10545-012-9524-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Vogel KR, Arning E, Wasek BL, Bottiglieri T, Gibson KM: Characterization of 2-(Methylamino)Alkanoic acids capacity to restrict blood–brain Phenylalanine transport in Pahenu2 Mice: preliminary findings. Molec Genet Metab. 2013, Aug 15 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  5. Strauss KA, Wardley B, Robinson D, Hendrickson C, Rider NL, Puffenberger EG, Shellmer D, Moser AB, Morton DH: Classical maple syrup urine disease and brain development: principles of management and formula design. Mol Genet Metab. 2010, 99 (4): 333-345. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.12.007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. le Roux C, Murphy E, Hallam P, Lilburn M, Orlowska D, Lee P: Neuropsychometric outcome predictors for adults with maple syrup urine disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2006, 29: 201-202. 10.1007/s10545-006-0223-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Muelly ER, Moore GJ, Bunce SC, Mack J, Bigler DC, Morton DH, Strauss KA: Biochemical correlates of neuropsychiatric illness in maple syrup urine disease. J Clin Invest. 2013, 123: 1809-1820. 10.1172/JCI67217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Mazariegos GV, Morton DH, Sindhi R, Soltys K, Nayyar N, Bond G, Shellmer D, Shneider B, Vockley J, Strauss KA: Liver transplantation for classical maple syrup urine disease: long-term follow-up in 37 patients and comparative United network for organ sharing experience. J Pediatr. 2012, 160 (1): 116-121.e1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.06.033.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Morton DH, Strauss KA, Robinson DL, Puffenberger EG, Kelley RI: Diagnosis and treatment of maple syrup disease: a study of 36 patients. Pediatrics. 2002, 109: 999-1008. 10.1542/peds.109.6.999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Simon E, Schwarz M, Wendel U: Social outcome in adults with maple syrup urine disease (MSUD). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007, 30: 264-10.1007/s10545-007-0475-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schönberger S, Schweiger B, Schwahn B, Schwarz M, Wendel U: Dysmyelination in the brain of adolescents and young adults with maple syrup urine disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2004, 82: 69-75. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.01.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Klee D, Thimm E, Wittsack HJ, Schubert D, Primke R, Pentang G, Schaper J, Mödder U, Antoch A, Wendel U, Cohnen M: Structural white matter changes in adolescents and young adults with maple syrup urine disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013, Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  13. Packman W, Mehta I, Rafie S, Mehta J, Naldi M, Mooney KH: Young adults with MSUD and their transition to adulthood: psychosocial issues. J Genet Couns. 2012, 21: 692-703. 10.1007/s10897-012-9490-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carecchio M, Schneider SA, Chan H, Lachmann R, Lee PJ, Murphy E, Bhatia KP: Movement disorders in adult surviving patients with maple syrup urine disease. Mov Disord. 2011, 26 (7): 1324-1328. 10.1002/mds.23629.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Shellmer DA, DeVito DA, Dew MA, Noll RB, Feldman H, Strauss KA, Morton DH, Vockley J, Mazariegos GV: Cognitive and adaptive functioning after liver transplantation for maple syrup urine disease: a case series. Pediatr Transplant. 2011, 15 (1): 58-64. 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01411.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Walsh KS, Scott MN: Neurocognitive profile in a case of maple syrup urine disease. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010, 24 (4): 689-700. 10.1080/13854040903527279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Strauss KA, Puffenberger EG, Morton DH: Maple Syrup Urine Disease. GeneReviews™ [Internet]. Edited by: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Fong CT, Stephens K. 2006, Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle, Jan 30 [updated 2013 May 09].Google Scholar
  18. Bridi R, Braun CA, Zorzi GK, Wannmacher CM, Wajner M, Lissi EG, Dutra-Filho CS: Alpha-keto acids accumulating in maple syrup urine disease stimulate lipid peroxidation and reduce antioxidant defences in cerebral cortex from young rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2005, 20: 155-167. 10.1007/s11011-005-4152-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Funchal C, Gottfried C, De Almeida LM, Wajner M, Pessoa-Pureur R: Evidence that the branched-chain alpha-keto acids accumulating in maple syrup urine disease induce morphological alterations and death in cultured astrocytes from rat cerebral cortex. Glia. 2004, 48: 230-240. 10.1002/glia.20072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Barschak AG, Marchesan C, Sitta A, Deon M, Giugliani R, Wajner M, Vargas CR: Maple syrup urine disease in treated patients: biochemical and oxidative stress profiles. Clin Biochem. 2008, 41: 317-324. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Kane RL, Hawkins RA: Na + -dependent transport of large neutral amino acids occurs at the abluminal membrane of the blood–brain barrier. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 285: E1167-E1173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yudkoff M, Daikhin Y, Nissim I, Horyn O, Luhovyy B, Lazarow A, Nissim I: Brain amino acid requirements and toxicity: the example of leucine. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 1531S-1538S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yudkoff M: Brain metabolism of branched-chain amino acids. Glia. 1997, 21: 92-98. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199709)21:1<92::AID-GLIA10>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dodd PR, Williams SH, Gundlach AL, Harper PA, Healy PJ, Dennis JA, Johnston GA: Glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid neurotransmitter systems in the acute phase of maple syrup urine disease and citrullinemia encephalopathies in newborn calves. J Neurochem. 1992, 59: 582-590. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09409.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zinnanti WJ, Lazovic J, Griffin K, Skvorak KJ, Paul HS, Homanics GE, Bewley MC, Cheng KC, Lanoue KF, Flanagan JM: Dual mechanism of brain injury and novel treatment strategy in maple syrup urine disease. Brain. 2009, 132 (Pt 4): 903-918.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sitta A, Ribas GS, Mescka CP, Barschak AG, Wajner M, Vargas CR: Neurological damage in MSUD: the role of oxidative stress. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2013, Nov 13. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  27. Choi TB, Pardridge WM: Phenylalanine transport at the human blood–brain barrier. Studies with isolated human brain capillaries. J Biol Chem. 1986, 261 (14): 6536-6541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith QR, Momma S, Aoyagi M, Rapoport SI: Kinetics of neutral amino acid transport across the blood–brain barrier. J Neurochem. 1987, 49: 1651-1658. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1987.tb01039.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ney DM, Blank RD, Hansen KE: Advances in the nutritional and pharmacological management of phenylketonuria. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014, 17 (1): 61-68.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Brunetti-Pierri N, Lanpher B, Erez A, Ananieva EA, Islam M, Marini JC, Sun Q, Yu C, Hegde M, Li J, Wynn RM, Chuang DT, Hutson S, Lee B: Phenylbutyrate therapy for maple syrup urine disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20 (4): 631-640. 10.1093/hmg/ddq507.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Popescu I, Dima SO: Domino liver transplantation: how far can we push the paradigm?. Liver Transpl. 2012, 18: 22-28. 10.1002/lt.22443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Strauss KA, Mazariegos GV, Sindhi R, Squires R, Finegold DN, Vockley G, Robinson DL, Hendrickson C, Virji M, Cropcho L, Puffenberger EG, McGhee W, Seward LM, Morton DH: Elective liver transplantation for the treatment of classical maple syrup urine disease. Am J Transplant. 2006, 6 (3): 557-564. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Skvorak KJ, Hager EJ, Arning E, Bottiglieri T, Paul HS, Strom SC, Homanics GE, Sun Q, Jansen EE, Jakobs C, Zinnanti WJ, Gibson KM: Hepatocyte transplantation (HTx) corrects selected neurometabolic abnormalities in murine intermediate maple syrup urine disease (iMSUD). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1792: 1004-1010. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.08.006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Skvorak KJ, Paul HS, Dorko K, Marongiu F, Ellis E, Chace D, Ferguson C, Gibson KM, Homanics GE, Strom SC: Hepatocyte transplantation improves phenotype and extends survival in a murine model of intermediate maple syrup urine disease. Mol Ther. 2009, 17: 1266-1273. 10.1038/mt.2009.99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Antflick JE, Baker GB, Hampson DR: The effects of a low protein diet on amino acids and enzymes in the serine synthesis pathway in mice. Amino Acids. 2010, 39: 145-153. 10.1007/s00726-009-0387-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Narayan SB, Ditewig-Meyers G, Graham KS, Scott R, Bennett MJ: Measurement of plasma amino acids by Ultraperformance® Liquid Chromatography. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011, 49: 1177-1185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Barber TW, Brockway JA, Higgins LS: The density of tissues in and about the head. Acta Neurol Scand. 1970, 46: 85-92. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1970.tb05606.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoffmann B, Helbling C, Schadewaldt P, Wendel U: Impact of longitudinal plasma leucine levels on the intellectual outcome in patients with classic MSUD. Pediatr Res. 2006, 59 (1): 17-20. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000190571.60385.34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardridge WM, Oldendorf WH: Kinetic analysis of blood–brain barrier transport of amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975, 401 (1): 128-136. 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90347-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tews JK, Kim YW, Harper AE: Induction of threonine imbalance by dispensable amino acids: relation to competition for amino acid transport into brain. J Nutr. 1979, 109 (2): 304-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tews JK, Kim YW, Harper AE: Induction of threonine imbalance by dispensable amino acids: relationships between tissue amino acids and diet in rats. J Nutr. 1980, 110 (3): 394-408.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vogel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement