Open Access

Perhexiline maleate in the treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: an open-labeled clinical trial

  • Hiroshi Kitoh1Email author,
  • Masataka Achiwa2,
  • Hiroshi Kaneko1,
  • Kenichi Mishima1,
  • Masaki Matsushita1,
  • Izumi Kadono3,
  • John D Horowitz4,
  • Benedetta C Sallustio4,
  • Kinji Ohno5 and
  • Naoki Ishiguro1
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20138:163

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-163

Received: 24 April 2013

Accepted: 13 October 2013

Published: 16 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Currently, there are no effective medical treatment options to prevent the formation of heterotopic bones in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). By the drug repositioning strategy, we confirmed that perhexiline maleate (Pex) potentially ameliorates heterotopic ossification in model cells and mice. Here, we conducted a prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of Pex in the treatment of FOP patients.

Methods

FOP patients in this open-label single-center study were treated with Pex for a total of 12 months, and followed up for 12 consecutive months after medication discontinuation. The safety of the treatment was assessed regularly by physical and blood examinations. The efficacy of Pex for preventing heterotopic ossifications was evaluated by the presence of flare-ups, measurements of serum bone markers, and changes in the total bone volume calculated by the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images.

Results

Five patients with an average age of 23.4 years were enrolled. Within safe doses of Pex administration in each individual, there were no drug-induced adverse effects during the medication phase. Three patients showed no intense inflammatory reactions during the study period, while two patients had acute flare-ups around the hip joint without evidence of trauma during the medication phase. In addition, one of them became progressively incapable of opening her mouth over the discontinuation phase. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bone specific ALP (BAP) were significantly and synchronously increased with the occurrence of flare-ups. Volumetric 3D-CT analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the total bone volume of Case 2 (378 cm3) and Case 3 (833 cm3) during the two-year study period.

Conclusions

We could not prove the efficacy of oral Pex administration in the prevention of heterotopic ossifications in FOP. Serum levels of ALP and BAP appear to be promising biomarkers for monitoring the development of ectopic ossifications and efficacy of the therapy. Quantification of change in the total bone volume by whole body CT scanning could be a reliable evaluation tool for disease progression in forthcoming clinical trials of FOP.

Keywords

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressivaPerhexiline maleateClinical trialBiomarkerWhole body CT

Background

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) (OMIM: 135100) is a severely disabling heritable disorder of connective tissue characterized by congenital malformations of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification in various extraskeletal sites. FOP is very rare with a worldwide prevalence of approximately 1/2,000,000 [1]. It is caused by a recurrent activating mutation (617G > A, R206H) in the gene encoding activin A receptor type I (ACVR1)/activin-like kinase 2 (ALK2), a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor [2]. In FOP, the mutant receptor causes up-regulation of a transcriptional factor, Id1. Typically, during the first decade of life, sporadic episodes of painful soft tissue swellings (flare-ups) occur, which can transform skeletal muscles, tendons, ligaments, fascia, and aponeuroses into heterotopic bone [3]. Progressive heterotopic ossifications span the joints, lock them in place, and render movement impossible [4]. Immobility is cumulative and most patients are wheelchair-bound by the end of second decade of life [5]. Attempts to remove heterotopic bones usually lead to explosive new bone formation.

At present, there is no definitive pharmacotherapy to prevent progressive heterotopic ossifications in FOP. Recently, dorsomorphin and LDN-193189, a selective inhibitor of BMP type I receptor kinases, have been reported to inhibit activation of the BMP signaling in cultures cells and mice [6, 7]. Similarly, CD1530, an agonist of nuclear retinoic acid receptor-γ, prevented heterotopic ossification in FOP model mice [8]. None of these compounds, however, has been applied in clinical practice.

A promising alternative for orphan diseases is the drug repositioning strategy, in which a drug currently used for patients with a specific disease is applied to another disease [9]. The advantage of this strategy is that the identified drugs are readily available and the adverse effects are known. In order to search for clinically applicable drugs for FOP, we screened 1040 FDA-approved drugs for suppression of the Id1 promoter activated by the mutant ACVR1/ALK2 in mouse C2C12 myoblasts. We found that perhexiline maleate (Pex), which is a prophylactic antianginal drug widely used for stable angina but its use markedly declined in the early 1980s after reports of hepatotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy, suppressed the Id1 promoter activity and mRNA expression of native Id1 and alkaline phosphatase by down-regulating phosphorylation of Smad1/5/8. Pex also reduced the volume of heterotopic ossification in crude BMP-induced model mice [10]. Here, we conducted an open-labeled clinical trial of Pex administration in the management of FOP.

Methods

This study was a non-randomized, non-placebo-controlled investigation to prospectively estimate the effect of Pex treatment in FOP patients. Eligible for participation were the patients who presented classic features of FOP including congenital malformation of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification of soft tissues, and those who had R206H mutation in the ACVR1/ALK2 gene [11]. Because safety of Pex administration in children has not been established, skeletally immature patients were excluded from the study. Since there is no known effective treatment in preventing heterotopic ossification of FOP, we did not exclude the patients who received concurrent use of other medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. After approval from the Institutional Review Boards of the Nagoya University, patients who provided written informed consent were enrolled in the study.

All patients continued to receive Pex administration for a total of 12 months. At the end of this period, they discontinued Pex pharmacotherapy and were monitored for 12 consecutive months of discontinuation follow-up phase. After two weeks administration of an initial dose of 100 mg/day, plasma concentration of Pex was measured to adjust the dosage in each individual. Therapeutic drug monitoring was then regularly performed during the medication phase by Drs. John D. Horowitz and Benedetta C. Sallustio (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia), and an optimal dose of oral Pex administration was individually determined based on a range for Pex of 0.15-0.60 mg/L. The Safety of treatment was assessed by a monthly physical examination and a complete blood count/serum chemistry evaluation every three months, with a special care for known adverse effects of Pex including peripheral neuropathy and drug induced hepatic dysfunction [12]. The efficacy of Pex for preventing heterotopic ossifications was evaluated clinically and biochemically, as well as by volumetric computed tomography (CT). Careful physical examination was performed on each patient to observe the presence of flare-ups and the development of new ectopic ossifications. Serum concentrations of non-specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and osteocalcin (OC) were measured at baseline, after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of Pex treatment (M: medication phase), and after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of medication discontinuation (D: discontinuation phase), using the commercially available Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) method, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and radioimmunoassay (RIA) respectively (SRL Inc, Japan). For quantitative evaluation of ectopic bones to be formed, whole body scanning by 16 slice multi-detector CT was performed before the intervention (baseline), at the end of Pex medication (M-12 m: 12 months after commencement of treatment), and at the end of the study (D-12 m: 12 months after medication discontinuation). Due to various degrees of contractures in the upper and lower extremities as well as in the trunk, the top of the skull or periphery of the limbs sometimes failed to be imaged in some patients. Thus, we defined structural regions of interest (ROI) as the maximum 3D-CT imaging ranges to be analyzable which was standardized in each individual. Based on 3D-CT images, total bone volume (expressed as cm3) in each patient was calculated by quantitative density analysis. The volume of newly formed bones was quantified by change in the total bone volume during the medication and discontinuation phases.

Result

Five FOP patients were enrolled in the study between July 2010 and July 2012 (Table 1). There were three males and two females with an average age of 23.4 years (range, 18–36 years). All patients had significant deformities associated with severely restricted mobility of the spine and limbs. Two patients were confined to a wheelchair and required assistance in performing activities of daily living. Two patients received concurrent treatment with COX-2 inhibitor on a regular basis, and three patients irregularly took fast-acting NSAIDs when they felt pain. Under strictly controlling plasma concentration of Pex within 0.15-0.60 mg/L, the steady dosage of Pex varied between individuals from 14 mg/day (100 mg/week) to 200 mg/day. No obvious drug-induced adverse effects were found and no patients discontinued Pex administration during the whole period of treatment.
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics and clinical outcome

Case

Age (years)

Gender

Dose of Pex

Adverse events

Acute inflammatory reaction (site)

1

36

Male

150 mg/d

None

None

2

26

Male

200 mg/d

None

M-7 m (right proximal thigh)

3

18

Female

75 mg/d

None

M-8 m (left hip), D-2 m (right jaw)

4

18

Female

14 mg/d

None

None

5

19

Male

100 mg/d

None

None

Pex = Perhexiline maleate; M-7 m = Medication phase at 7 months.

M-8 m = Medication phase at 8 months; D-2 m = Discontinuation phase at 2 months.

In three of the five patients, there were no intense inflammatory reactions associated with flare-ups during the study period, although this could happen randomly (Table 1). On the other hand, acute flare-ups were observed in two patients (Cases 2 and 3) without evidence of trauma during the medication phase (M-7 m and M-8 m, respectively) and high-dose corticosteroid treatment was administered in each patient at the beginning of flare-ups according to the treatment guidelines of International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA) [13]. These flare-ups occurred in the right proximal thigh in Case 2 and around the left hip joint in Case 3. Following flare-ups, their hip joint mobility gradually deteriorated. In addition, Case 3 complained of severe right jaw pain and subsequent difficulty in mouth opening during the early discontinuation phase (D-2 m). Limited opening of the mouth resulted in interference with eating and oral hygiene.

Serum concentration of OC had no significant change in all patients (Figure 1a). During the whole study period, serum ALP and BAP levels were maintained at a normal range in the three patients who did not have inflammatory reactions. In the other two patients (Cases 2 and 3), on the other hand, these bone markers significantly and synchronously elevated following the occurrence of flare-ups during medication phase (Figure 1b,c). Elevated ALP and BAP levels were gradually reduced with time, but in Case 3, both bone markers rebounded with acute inflammation of her right jaw during the early discontinuation phase.
Figure 1

Serial measurements of serum osteocalcin (a), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (b) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (c) from 5 FOP patients. Serum levels of osteocalcin were maintained within the normal range during the study period in all patients. Serum levels of ALP rapidly elevated at M-9 m in Cases 2 and 3 who showed acute flare-ups at M-7 m and M-8 m, respectively. Case 3, who showed acute inflammation of her right jaw at D-2 m, had persistent higher ALP levels at D-3 m. Changes in serum BAP activity positively correlated to those in serum ALP levels.

Quantitative 3D-CT analysis demonstrated that the total bone volume did not change in three patients (Cases 1, 4, and 5) during the study period, while a substantial increase in the total bone volume, both during the medication and discontinuation phases, was found in two patients (Figure 2a,b). In Case 2, increased bone volume of 223 cm3 during the medication phase and that of 155 cm3 during the discontinuation phase seemed to be associated with heterotopic bone formations in the right adductor muscle, and around the mid-femur, respectively (Figure 3a-g). In Case 3, there was an increase of 297 cm3 in the total bone volume during the medication phase, which seemed to be related to intramuscular ossification in her left iliopsoas (Figure 4a-d). She also showed a maximal increased bone volume of 536 cm3 during the discontinuation phase, which appeared to reflect maturation of the iliopsoas ossification and newly developed bones in the gluteus medius (Figure 4e-g) and around the right jaw joints (Figure 4h,i).
Figure 2

Volumetric computed tomography (CT) examination. Representative reconstructed 3D-CT image obtained by whole body scanning of Case 1 (a), and changes in total bone volume within the region of interests (ROI) in each FOP patient (b). In Case 2, total bone volume has increased 223 cm3 and 155 cm3 during the medication and discontinuation phases, respectively. In Case 3, there was an increase of 297 cm3 and 536 cm3 in the total bone volume during the medication and discontinuation phases, respectively.

Figure 3

CT images from Case 2. Reconstructed 3D-CT images of the pelvis and bilateral femora at baseline (a), at M-12 m (c), and at D-12 m (f). Axial CT images of the right hip at baseline (b), and at M-12 m (d), and those of the right mid-femur at M-12 m (e), and at D-12 m (g). Heterotopic ossifications in the right adductor muscle (arrow) developed during the medication phase and around mid-femur developed during the discontinuation phase ware clearly demonstrated.

Figure 4

CT images form Case 3. Reconstructed 3D-CT images of the hip joints at baseline (a), at M-12 m (c), and at D-12 m (f). Axial CT images of the left pelvis at baseline (b), at M-12 m (d, e), and at D-12 m (g), and those of the bilateral jaws at M-12 m (h), and at D-12 m (i). Massive new bone formations in the left iliac muscle were developed during the medication phase (d, arrow). During the discontinuation phase, the left intra-iliopsoas ossification matured (g, arrow), and heterotopic boned in the left gluteus medius (g, arrow head) and the right jaw joint (i, arrow) were newly formed.

Discussion

To date, there are few clinical trials in the treatment of FOP. Zasloff et al. [14] conducted a prospective study to assess the efficacy of isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) in the prevention of heterotopic ossification in FOP, and concluded that isotretinoin had no apparent effect in the prevention of new bone formation after surgery or after soft tissue trauma. Brantus and Meunier [15] evaluated the effects of intravenous administration of etidronate and oral corticosteroids for thirty-one FOP attacks in seven patients, and observed 10 new ossifications causing severe deterioration of joint mobility during the mean six years of follow up. These studies indicated that there is no proven efficacy with any therapy in changing the natural history of the disease. Despite the Pex treatment, heterotopic ossification developed rapidly in our two patients suggesting that oral administration of Pex within 0.15-0.60 mg/L seemed to be unsatisfactory in the inhibition of heterotopic ossifications in FOP. Moreover, there is a concerning possibility that Pex administration unexpectedly induced heterotopic ossification in these patients.

Abnormal biochemical measurements of bone mineral metabolism have rarely been reported in FOP [16]. Establishment of useful biomarkers as correlates of disease severity and clinical outcome is desirable to enable early proof-of-concept studies that can help screen potential drug candidates and identify therapeutic targets. Kaplan et al. [17] described that serum ALP activity may increase during disease flare-ups. Our serial clinical and biochemical evaluations demonstrated that elevation of serum ALP and BAP, which synchronized with acute flare-ups, preceded the heterotopic new bone formations. Serum levels of ALP or BAP could be useful biomarkers for monitoring the development of heterotopic ossifications and efficacy of the therapy in FOP.

Multi-detector-row CT has widely been used in clinical environments, and whole body scanning allows 3D structural characterization of entire bone segment at high resolution [18]. Despite the restricted movement and joint immobilization of our patients, standardization of ROI in each individual could allow for accurate volume calculating capabilities. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have presented quantitative assessment of ectopic bone formations in FOP. Volumetric 3D-CT analyses demonstrated that change in the total bone volume correlated with the clinical symptoms and laboratory examinations in two patients who showed active flare-ups. Our study highlights greater capabilities of whole body CT scanning as an evaluation tool for disease progression in FOP, especially in assessment of treatment efficacy during forthcoming clinical trials.

There are several major limitations in the present study. First, since there are no better natural history studies for FOP to date, it is difficult to design any clinical trial with meaningful endpoints. Furthermore, we do not know the natural evolution of ectopic bone formations in our patients. Second, the present study could not be designed for pediatric FOP patients because of uncertainty in safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Pex in the pediatric population. Third, heterotopic ossification in FOP is generally formed via an endochondral ossification process, but we did not confirm heterotopic cartilage formation in our patients. Quantification of total bone volume based on 3D-CT images could be a reliable evaluation tool for assessment of ectopic bone formations, but radiation exposure by CT examination may be a major issue for young patients. Besides, whole body scanning has always been uncomfortable for severely deformed FOP patients, although it takes less than five minutes. Without scanning the whole body, heterotopic ossification following flare-ups (if they occur) could be evaluated by a narrow scan around the flare-ups region. For future clinical trials, standardization of imaging protocol will be expected in evaluating heterotopic bones in FOP.

Conclusions

Although the number of patients is too small to draw reliable conclusions, oral administration of Pex within the safety dose seemed not to be effective in the inhibition of heterotopic ossifications in FOP, despite the absence of significant adverse effects.

Authors’ information

H Kitoh is a member of the Japanese Research Committee on Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.

Abbreviations

FOP: 

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

ACVR1: 

Activin A receptor type I

ALK2: 

Activin-like kinase 2

BMP: 

Bone morphogenetic protein

Pex: 

Perhexiline maleate

NSAIDs: 

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

COX-2: 

Cyclooxygenase-2

CT: 

Computed tomography

ALP: 

Alkaline phosphatase

BAP: 

Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase

OC: 

Osteocalcin

JSCC: 

Japan society of clinical chemistry

EIA: 

Enzyme immunoassay

RIA: 

Radioimmunoassay

3D: 

Three-dimensional

ROI: 

Regions of interest

IFOPA: 

International Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva association.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in partly by Research Committee on Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva form the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
(4)
Department of Cardiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
(5)
Division of Neurogenetics, Center for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine

References

  1. Shore EM, Feldman GJ, Xu M, Kaplan FS: The genetics of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2005, 3: 201-204. 10.1385/BMM:3:3-4:201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, Fenstermacher DA, Cho T-J, Choi IH, Connor JM, Delai P, Glaser DL, Le Merrer M, Morhart R, Rogers JG, Smith R, Triffitt JT, Urtizberea JA, Zasloff M, Brown MA, Kaplan FS: A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 525-527. 10.1038/ng1783.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaplan FS, Chakkalakal SA, Shore EM: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: mechanisms and models of skeletal metamorphosis. Dis Model Mech. 2012, 5: 756-762. 10.1242/dmm.010280.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pignolo RJ, Shore EM, Kaplan FS: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Clinical and genetic aspects. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011, 6: 80-10.1186/1750-1172-6-80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen RB, Hahn GV, Tabas JA, Peeper J, Levitz CL, Sando A, Sando N, Zasloff M, Kaplan FS: The natural history of heterotopic ossification in patients who have fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. A study of forty-four patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993, 75: 215-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yu PB, Hong CC, Sachidanandan C, Babitt JL, Deng DY, Hoyng SA, Lin HY, Bloch KD, Peterson RT: Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism. Nat Chem Biol. 2008, 4: 33-441. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.54.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yu PB, Deng DY, Lai CS, Hong CC, Cuny GD, Bouxsein ML, Hong DW, McManus PM, Katagiri T, Sachidanandan C, et al: BMP type I receptor inhibition reduces heterotopic [corrected] ossification. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 1363-1369. 10.1038/nm.1888.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shimono K, Tung WE, Macolino C, Chi AH, Didizian JH, Mundy C, Chandraratna RA, Mishina Y, Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Pacifici M, Iwamoto M: Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-gamma agonists. Nat Med. 2011, 17: 454-460. 10.1038/nm.2334.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Abbott A: Neurologists strike gold in drug screen effort. Nature. 2002, 417: 109-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamamoto R, Matsushita M, Kitoh H, Masuda A, Ito M, Katagiri T, Kawai T, Ishiguro N, Ohno K: Clinically applicable antianginal agents suppress osteoblastic transformation of myogenic cells and heterotopic ossifications in mice. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013, 31: 26-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuda T, Kohda M, Kanomata K, Nojima J, Nakamura A, Kamizono J, Noguchi Y, Iwakiri K, Kondo T, Kurose J, Endo K, Awakura T, Fukushi J, Nakashima Y, Chiyonobu T, Kawara A, Nishida Y, Wada I, Akita M, Komori T, Nakayama K, Nanba A, Maruki Y, Yoda T, Tomoda H, Yu PB, Shore EM, Kaplan FS, Miyazomo K, Matsuoka M, et al: Constitutively activated ALK2 and increases SMAD1/5 cooperatively induce bone morphogenetic protein signaling in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 7149-7156.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shah RR, Oates NS, Idle JR, Smith RL, Lockhart JD: Impaired oxidation of debrisoquine in patients with perhexiline neuropathy. Br Med J. 1982, 284: 295-299. 10.1136/bmj.284.6312.295.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association. [http://www.ifopa.org/en/living-with-fop-menu/treatment-guidelines.html]
  14. Zasloff MA, Roche DM, Crofford LJ, Hahn GV, Kaplan FS: Treatment of patients who have fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva with isotretinoin. Clin Orthop. 1998, 346: 121-129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Brantus JF, Meunier PJ: Effects of intravenous etidronate and oral corticosteroids in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Clin Orthop. 1998, 346: 117-120.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Blumenkrantz N, Asboe-Hansen G: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biochemical changes in blood serum, urine, skin, bone, and ectopic ossification. Scand J Rheumatol. 1978, 7: 85-89. 10.3109/03009747809098841.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan FS, LeMerrer M, Glaser DL, Pignolo RJ, Goldsby RE, Kitterman JA, Groppe J, Shore EM: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 22: 191-205.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ptak T, Rhea JT, Novelline RA: Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience. Radiology. 2003, 229: 902-905. 10.1148/radiol.2293021651.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kitoh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.