Skip to main content

Cone rod dystrophies


Cone rod dystrophies (CRDs) (prevalence 1/40,000) are inherited retinal dystrophies that belong to the group of pigmentary retinopathies. CRDs are characterized by retinal pigment deposits visible on fundus examination, predominantly localized to the macular region. In contrast to typical retinitis pigmentosa (RP), also called the rod cone dystrophies (RCDs) resulting from the primary loss in rod photoreceptors and later followed by the secondary loss in cone photoreceptors, CRDs reflect the opposite sequence of events. CRD is characterized by primary cone involvement, or, sometimes, by concomitant loss of both cones and rods that explains the predominant symptoms of CRDs: decreased visual acuity, color vision defects, photoaversion and decreased sensitivity in the central visual field, later followed by progressive loss in peripheral vision and night blindness. The clinical course of CRDs is generally more severe and rapid than that of RCDs, leading to earlier legal blindness and disability. At end stage, however, CRDs do not differ from RCDs. CRDs are most frequently non syndromic, but they may also be part of several syndromes, such as Bardet Biedl syndrome and Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7). Non syndromic CRDs are genetically heterogeneous (ten cloned genes and three loci have been identified so far). The four major causative genes involved in the pathogenesis of CRDs are ABCA4 (which causes Stargardt disease and also 30 to 60% of autosomal recessive CRDs), CRX and GUCY2D (which are responsible for many reported cases of autosomal dominant CRDs), and RPGR (which causes about 2/3 of X-linked RP and also an undetermined percentage of X-linked CRDs). It is likely that highly deleterious mutations in genes that otherwise cause RP or macular dystrophy may also lead to CRDs. The diagnosis of CRDs is based on clinical history, fundus examination and electroretinogram. Molecular diagnosis can be made for some genes, genetic counseling is always advised. Currently, there is no therapy that stops the evolution of the disease or restores the vision, and the visual prognosis is poor. Management aims at slowing down the degenerative process, treating the complications and helping patients to cope with the social and psychological impact of blindness.

Disease name

Cone rod dystrophies (CRDs)

Definition and diagnosis criteria

CRDs are inherited retinal dystrophies that belong to the pigmentary retinopathies group.

Functional signs and symptoms

• Decrease in the visual acuity is the earliest symptom

• Photophobia also occurs early

• Frequent dyschromatopsia

• Night blindness occurs later

Visual field

• Central scotoma appears first, preventing fluent reading

• Patchy losses of peripheral vision follow

• Severe loss of vision occurs earlier than in retinitis pigmentosa (RP)


• Normal looking macula or fine macular lesions and pallor of the optic disc may be the only signs at early stage

• Pigmentary deposits resembling bone spicules, frequently in macular area

• Attenuation of the retinal vessels

• Waxy pallor of the optic disc

• Various degrees of retinal atrophy

Electroretinogram (ERG)

• Implicit time (between a- and b-wave peaks) shift at the 30-Hz flicker responses, along with delayed a- and b-wave single flash photopic response are early signs before amplitude reduction

• Dramatic decrease of amplitudes of both a- and b-waves

• Predominant involvement of photopic (cones) over scotopic (rods) responses


Prevalence of CRDs is estimated at 1/40,000 (thus, CRDs are ten times less frequent than RP) [1].

Clinical description

Non syndromic cone rod dystrophies

CRDs present first as a macular disease or as a diffuse retinopathy with predominance of the macular involvement. In contrast to the symptoms of the rod cone dystrophies (RCDs, typical retinitis pigmentosa) resulting from predominant rod involvement, i.e. night blindness and loss of peripheral vision, the clinical signs of CRDs reflect the predominant involvement of cones, which leads to decreased visual acuity and loss of sensitivity in the central visual field. This fits the original description of the CRD entity in which cone loss precedes rod degeneration. However, in some cases, diffuse retinopathy affects simultaneously cones and rods, resulting in both night blindness and loss of visual acuity. These cases may also be considered as CRDs, although they overlap with other entities (see differential diagnosis). In general, CRDs are more severe than RCDs because the loss of patients' autonomy occurs earlier. It is convenient to describe two stages in the disease course of CRD.

In the first stage, the main symptom is decreased visual acuity, which is usually discovered at school, in the first decade of life, and which does not significantly improve with spectacles. Patients often have a noticeable deviated gaze to project images on parafoveal regions of their retina that are less damaged. Along with this symptom, there are intense photophobia and a variable degree of dyschromatopsia. In contrast, night blindness is not mentioned by patients or, when present, is never as prominent as the decrease in visual acuity. Visual field testing shows central scotomas, while periphery is spared. As a result, patients have no difficulties to move. Fundus examination shows pigment deposits and various degrees of retinal atrophy in the macular region (Figure 1). Retinal vessels are usually normal or moderately attenuated. The optic disc is often pale at early stages, particularly on the temporal side, which accounts for the macular fibre bundle. At this stage, the question is to differentiate CRDs from macular dystrophies such as Stargardt disease, cone dystrophies and other rare macular conditions. Additional investigations help the diagnosis. First, fluorescein angiography and fundus autofluorescence show that the peripheral retina is also involved with heterogeneity in the fluorescence, but to a lesser extent than the macula. Second, the electroretinogram (ERG) shows a shift in implicit time of cone responses, followed by a decrease in both cone and rod responses. Cone responses are more severely affected than rod responses.

Figure 1
figure 1

Fundus of a 45 year-old patient with cone rod dystrophy segregating with a loss-of-function mutation (E1087X) in ABCA4. Note the presence of various-shaped pigment deposits in the posterior pole with atrophy of the retina, while the retina appears less damaged in periphery (upper part of the photograph).

In the second stage, night blindness becomes more apparent and the loss in the peripheral visual field progresses. Therefore, patients have difficulties to move autonomously. In addition, visual acuity continues to decrease to a level where reading is no longer possible. Nystagmus is often present. At this stage, patients are legally blind (visual acuity <1/20), even though large parts of the peripheral visual field remain preserved.

Syndromic cone rod dystrophies

There are a few syndromes in which retinal degeneration characteristically features CRDs rather than typical RP.

Bardet Biedl syndrome (BBS) is an autosomal recessive disease with a prevalence ranging from 1/13,500 to 1/60,000. It associates retinal dystrophy with postaxial polydactyly, obesity, hypogenitalism, mental retardation or mild psychomotor delay, and renal abnormalities that can lead to renal failure. The retinal dystrophy is classically described as a RCD but many variants have been reported with a prominent macular involvement (Figure 2), indicating a CRD [2]. In fact, BBS patients have the diffuse type of CRD. In our experience, they always have macular involvement, with decreased visual acuity, photophobia and foveomacular hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography. The diagnosis of retinal dystrophy is often established in the first decade of life and legal blindness is reached before 20 years of age, but there are moderate forms of the disease. Diagnosis may be difficult when the clinical picture is incomplete. In this case, the presence of a CRD is an important sign. Twelve BBS genes encoding proteins involved in the cilium structure have been reported so far.

Figure 2
figure 2

Fundus of a 31 year-old patient with Bardet Biedl syndrome. The peripheral retina does not show any large lesion but the macula is atrophic.

Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 is an autosomal dominant spinocerebellar degeneration due to expansions of polyglutamine in the ataxin protein. The retinal disease often begins with granular macula progressively spreading out to the whole retina, while the macula becomes atrophic (Figure 3) [3]. Initially, the disease often presents as an isolated retinal dystrophy; the characteristic macular involvement and the importance of visual impairment in a previously well seeing patient should lead to neurological investigations.

Figure 3
figure 3

Fundus of a 34 year-old patient with cone rod dystrophy due to Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7). Note that the macular area, and also the mid periphery, are atrophic.

Ectodermal diseases. CRD is sometimes encountered in:

Amelogenesis imperfecta. This refers to several conditions in which the tooth enamel is abnormal. One form of amelogenesis imperfecta with autosomal recessive inheritance (OMIM # 217080) is associated with CRD and abnormally shaped teeth [46].

Hypotrichosis with juvenile macular dystrophy [7]. It is a rare form of autosomal recessive alopecia associated with macular dystrophy. Usually, the retinal impairment is restricted to the macula but in a few instances it has been reported to be a CRD [8].

Dysmorphic syndromes. CRDs have been reported in spondylometaphyseal dysplasia [9] and in cleft lip [10].

Metabolic dysfunctions. CRD has been reported to occur in several metabolic disease (thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia [11, 12]; one case with a mitochondrial mutation (T8993G) has been reported [13]. In addition, infantile Refsum disease with augmented phytanic acid and pigmentary retinopathy is associated with a characteristic prominent macular involvement, and in Alport syndrome (deafness, progressive nephritis) the fundus shows whitish flecks looking like crystals around the macula rather than an authentic pigmentary retinopathy.

Etiology of non syndromic CRDs

Non syndromic CRDs are, like typical RP, genetically heterogeneous. Three Mendelian types of inheritance have been reported. Today, there are 13 genes responsible for non syndromic CRDs (10 cloned, 3 mapped). These genes can be classified in several categories.

The 1st category includes genes mostly responsible for CRDs cases. The predominant one encodes the homeobox protein CRX, which controls rod and cone photoreceptor cell differentiation and survival. Most CRX mutations cause autosomal dominant CRD, with a prevalence estimated at 5 to 10% of dominant CRDs [14, 15]. The severity of the disease is highly variable with some mild cases and some very severe cases. In fact, at this end of the spectrum, there have been a few reports of dominant Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) caused by CRX mutations [16, 17], a condition which is usually recessive, as well as a few RPs. Two other genes have been found only in CRDs. These are RIM1, reported in one family with autosomal dominant CRD [18] and HRG4, reported in one family with uncertain inheritance [19]. Interestingly, both encoded proteins are involved in photoreceptor synaptic transmission.

The 2nd category includes genes mostly found in macular dystrophies. Today, it comprises essentially one gene, ABCA4, which is involved in the retinoid metabolism and causes the Stargardt disease. Mutations in the ABCA4 gene are responsible for 30 to 60% of the cases with autosomal recessive CRDs [2025]. In some cases, the disease begins as a Stargardt macular dystrophy, which soon extends to the periphery. In other cases, the disease starts as a diffuse retinopathy with predominance of macular involvement. It has been shown that the ABCA4 mutations linked to CRDs are truncating mutations, often on both alleles, whereas amino acid change mutations are more frequently found in Stargardt disease. This suggests that more deleterious truncating mutations are associated with more severe conditions like CRD [26]. Belonging to this 2nd category, mutations of GUCA1A have been described in one family with autosomal dominant CRD, while all other GUCA1A mutations are responsible for cone dystrophies. The GUCA1A gene encodes a protein that activates the guanylate cyclase (GC) [27]. GC itself is sometimes involved also in CRDs (see below).

The 3rd category includes two genes mostly found in RP cases. One codes for the outer segment protein peripherin/RDS and is usually involved in autosomal dominant RP. It is well known that there are inter- and intra-familial phenotypic variations with RDS mutations including cases of dominant macular dystrophy or dominant CRD [28]. CRDs due to mutations in the RDS gene are relatively moderate in comparison with autosomal recessive CRDs, as the autonomy of patients is conserved in early adulthood. The other gene codes for RPGR (involved in opsin trafficking, particularly that of cone opsins). RPGR is the major causative gene for X-linked RPs, but it also accounts for some X-linked CRD with its locus referred as COD1 or CORDX1 [29] and cone dystrophies. As for RPs, CRDs caused by mutations in the RPGR gene are severe and diagnosed early in life. In addition to RDS and RPGR, the CACNA1F gene, whose mutations lead to X-linked congenital stationary night blindness, is mutated in one CRD Finnish family previously mapped as CORDX3 (or COD4) [30].

The 4th category includes genes found in LCA. Today, there are three reported CRD families with mutations in the RPGRIP1 gene [31] (autosomal recessive inheritance) and AIPL1 [32] (autosomal dominant inheritance). These genes are usually involved in the pathogenesis of LCA. There are also several CRD families reported with mutations in GUCY2D [33, 34], which is the major causative gene for LCA. In contrast to LCA patients, CRD patients with GUCY2D-mutations have a dominant condition, the mutations being restricted to exon 13 encoding the dimerization domain of the guanylate cyclase.

There are loci for which the gene remains to be cloned. For autosomal dominant CRDs, the CORD1 gene (undetermined localization) has been found in a Danish family with CRD and mental retardation [35]. CORD4 has been mapped in a Canadian family with CRD associated with neurofibromatosis [36]. For autosomal recessive CRDs, there are CORD8 mapped in a Pakistani family [37] and CORD9 in a Brazilian family [38]. For X-linked CRDs, CORDX2 has been mapped to Xq27 [39].

Taken together, it seems that most genes responsible for CRDs are involved in other types of retinal dystrophies, including RPs, macular dystrophies and cone dystrophies, thereby placing CRDs in the center of the vast panel of retinal dystrophies. One can therefore speculate that any gene causing retinal dystrophy may potentially be involved in CRD pathogenesis, and the challenge is to understand the underlying mechanisms. It seems clear that deleterious mutations of retinal dystrophy genes can cause very severe diseases, and hence CRDs. However, it is not yet clear why in some families, some members have macular dystrophy or RP, whereas other members (with the same mutations) have CRD. Likewise, the question why some mutations in a gene lead to CRD whereas others cause RP, remains unresolved for several genes.

Diagnostic methods

Clinical diagnosis is based on the early decrease of visual acuity and photophobia, lesions in fundus, hypovolted ERG traces with predominant cone involvement, and progressive worsening of these signs. Full field ERG is the key test, particularly when patients are asymptomatic and show normal fundus at early stages. It is important to ascertain the diagnosis by repeating the examination one or two years after it has been first established. Multifocal ERG could be useful to follow precisely the functionality of the central retina.

At present, a systematic molecular testing is not routinely performed, due to the tremendous genetic heterogeneity of the disease. However, rapid and large-scale mutation screening techniques are developing and several laboratories perform search for mutations in the most frequently involved genes, including ABCA4, CRX, GUC1A; strategies to test in a short time several dozen of genes for a single patient DNA are emerging [23, 40].

In some instances, molecular diagnosis for certain genes is performed by the laboratories that have discovered them.

Differential diagnosis of non syndromic CRDs with other pigmentary retinopathies

CRDs are usually clearly differentiated from primary peripheral retinopathies and macular dystrophies. However, CRD may sometimes share features with several clinical entities.

Retinitis pigmentosa

Typical RP (rod cone dystrophy, RCD). In typical RCD, the diagnosis is easy because the first symptom is night blindness. This symptom typically remains isolated for several years with normal visual acuity before vision loss in daylight becomes prominent. In the fundus, pigment deposits are located in the periphery.

RP with early macular involvement. In some cases, RCD has a typical slow progression but macular involvement occurs quite early, with some loss of visual acuity. A disease history characterized by predominant night blindness and prominent rod involvement on ERG supports the diagnosis of RCD.

Early onset RP or late stage RP. In cases associated with early onset and severe RCD, the decrease in visual acuity with macular involvement may also occur early. It is again important to determine which sign, either night blindness or loss in central vision, appeared first in the disease course, and to perform ERG. The diagnosis may be particularly difficult when patients are examined at late stage. At that time, the typical changes in ERG are undetectable.

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)

This disease is associated with a high degree of visual impairment, which is already present at birth, and appears either as a rod- or cone-predominant disease, or both. Nystagmus, poor light fixation and reactivity, visual acuity lower than 1/20 and flat ERG are cardinal signs of the disease. Differential diagnosis with early onset CRD may be difficult because both diseases share the same clinical signs. The presence of a lapse time of several years before dramatic worsening of the visual disability will allow to classify the disease as CRD rather than LCA.


Large, extended maculopathies may be difficult to differentiate from end stage CRD or RP. In all cases, the full field ERG is a key investigation.

Stargardt disease is a maculopathy in which peripheral retina usually remains free of lesions. The disease is easy to recognize with the presence of yellow flecks that may cover the entire fundus (fundus flavimaculatus), hyperfluorescent macular lesions (bull's eye) and dark choroid on the fluorescein angiography. However, there are extended lesions in some late stage Stargardt cases, and in addition, a number of CRD are caused by the "Stargardt gene", ABCA4. In these cases, the early stage of the CRD may be similar to Stargardt disease, but, in a decade, signs of peripheral involvement occur.

Cone dystrophies. Rods remain normal in these diseases. Main clinical signs are loss of visual acuity, photophobia, dyschromatopsia, and exclusive cone involvement at ERG. However, in some cone dystrophies, there may be some rod involvement, particularly in late stage. In contrast to CRDs, rods remain at least partly spared at these late stages, whereas they are non recordable in late stage CRD. Another sign is the absence of macular lesions for many years, even though the visual acuity is decreased.

Stationary retinal diseases

This is essentially achromatopsia, which is diagnosed on the basis of mainly cone involvement (rod being not entirely normal), the lack of disease evolution, and the normal fundus.

Genetic counseling

Once the diagnosis CRD is made, patients should be informed and familial surveys recommended. Genetic counseling is always advised since all genetic forms can be encountered in CRD. A precise phenotypic diagnosis is always mandatory and is particularly useful in the absence of familial history or in sporadic cases.

Antenatal diagnosis

Prenatal diagnosis can be performed in families in which the responsible gene has been identified. However, prenatal diagnosis (amniocentesis or chorionic biopsy) raises an ethical issue: whether the investigative risks associated with these invasive prenatal procedures are justified in a non life-threatening disease is questionable.

Management including treatment

Currently, there is no therapy that stops the evolution of pigmentary retinopathies or restores the vision. However, there are several therapeutic strategies aimed at slowing down the degenerating process (light protection, vitaminotherapy), treating the complications such as cataract, macular edema, inflammation, and helping patients to cope with the social and psychological impact of blindness. In fact, management of CRDs is not different from the management of typical RP. A particular emphasis should be put on filtrating spectacles to minimize photophobia and on low vision aid. Patients are often severely visually disabled or legally blind by the end of the second decade of life. Therefore, it is important that their education focuses on an adapted professional occupation (teaching, computer based activities, physiotherapist).

Unresolved questions

Cloned genes account for only a small part of the autosomal dominant CRDs cases and probably for half of the autosomal recessive cases. Therefore, genes remain to be discovered. Understanding the role of the encoded proteins often requires many years. Today, for a number of proteins, substantial information about their function is available, while some of the proteins remain poorly known.

A challenging issue is the elucidation of the precise steps leading from a gene mutation to photoreceptor degeneration. Data from animal models and clinical studies suggest that photoreceptors die by apoptosis at a linear rate throughout life (named the "one-hit hypothesis"), implying that they have a given probability to undergo apoptosis that remains constant from early to late stages of the disease [41]. For certain genes or severe mutations, this probability will be high, while for others it will be lower. The results of experimental and clinical studies clearly indicate that the mechanisms of photoreceptor degeneration are multiple. In all genetic forms of CRDs studied until now, data are incomplete. In addition, it is likely that several apoptotic pathways are involved in the photoreceptor loss, sometimes concurrently, and this also needs to be carefully investigated. This knowledge is crucial to design therapies. The efficacy of various potential treatments has to be proven in animal models and in humans. For example, gene replacement therapy for RDS in mouse improves photoreceptor ultrastructure, but there is no significant effect on photoreceptor cell loss [42].


  1. Hamel CP, Griffoin JM, Bazalgette C, Lasquellec L, Duval PA, Bareil C, Beaufrere L, Bonnet S, Eliaou C, Marlhens F, Schmitt-Bernard CF, Tuffery S, Claustres M, Arnaud B: [Molecular genetics of pigmentary retinopathies: identification of mutations in CHM, RDS, RHO, RPE65, USH2A and XLRS1 genes]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2000, 23 (10): 985-995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beales PL, Elcioglu N, Woolf AS, Parker D, Flinter FA: New criteria for improved diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: results of a population survey. J Med Genet. 1999, 36 (6): 437-446.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Volpe NJ, Stevanin G, Brice A, Jacobson SG: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) shows a cone-rod dystrophy phenotype. Exp Eye Res. 2002, 74 (6): 737-745. 10.1006/exer.2002.1169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Downey LM, Keen TJ, Jalili IK, McHale J, Aldred MJ, Robertson SP, Mighell A, Fayle S, Wissinger B, Inglehearn CF: Identification of a locus on chromosome 2q11 at which recessive amelogenesis imperfecta and cone-rod dystrophy cosegregate. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002, 10 (12): 865-869. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jalili IK, Smith NJ: A progressive cone-rod dystrophy and amelogenesis imperfecta: a new syndrome. J Med Genet. 1988, 25 (11): 738-740.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaelides M, Bloch-Zupan A, Holder GE, Hunt DM, Moore AT: An autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy associated with amelogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. 2004, 41 (6): 468-473. 10.1136/jmg.2003.015792.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sprecher E, Bergman R, Richard G, Lurie R, Shalev S, Petronius D, Shalata A, Anbinder Y, Leibu R, Perlman I, Cohen N, Szargel R: Hypotrichosis with juvenile macular dystrophy is caused by a mutation in CDH3, encoding P-cadherin. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (2): 134-136. 10.1038/ng716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Samra D, Abraham FA, Treister G: Inherited progressive cone--rod dystrophy and alopecia. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol. 1988, 11 (1-2): 83-85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walters BA, Raff ML, Hoeve JV, Tesser R, Langer LO, France TD, Glass IA, Pauli RM: Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with cone-rod dystrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2004, 129 (3): 265-276. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ausems MG, Wittebol-Post D, Hennekam RC: Cleft lip and cone-rod dystrophy in a consanguineous sibship. Clin Dysmorphol. 1996, 5 (4): 307-311. 10.1097/00019605-199610000-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kipioti A, George ND, Hoffbrand AV, Sheridan E: Cone-rod dystrophy in thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2003, 40 (2): 105-107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meire FM, Van Genderen MM, Lemmens K, Ens-Dokkum MH: Thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia syndrome (TRMA) with cone-rod dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2000, 21 (4): 243-250. 10.1076/1381-6810(200012)21:4;1-H;FT243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Porto FB, Mack G, Sterboul MJ, Lewin P, Flament J, Sahel J, Dollfus H: Isolated late-onset cone-rod dystrophy revealing a familial neurogenic muscle weakness, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa syndrome with the T8993G mitochondrial mutation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001, 132 (6): 935-937. 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01187-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freund CL, Gregory-Evans CY, Furukawa T, Papaioannou M, Looser J, Ploder L, Bellingham J, Ng D, Herbrick JA, Duncan A, Scherer SW, Tsui LC, Loutradis-Anagnostou A, Jacobson SG, Cepko CL, Bhattacharya SS, McInnes RR: Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor. Cell. 1997, 91 (4): 543-553. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80440-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swain PK, Chen S, Wang QL, Affatigato LM, Coats CL, Brady KD, Fishman GA, Jacobson SG, Swaroop A, Stone E, Sieving PA, Zack DJ: Mutations in the cone-rod homeobox gene are associated with the cone-rod dystrophy photoreceptor degeneration. Neuron. 1997, 19 (6): 1329-1336. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80423-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perrault I, Hanein S, Gerber S, Barbet F, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Rozet JM, Kaplan J: Evidence of autosomal dominant Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) underlain by a CRX heterozygous null allele. J Med Genet. 2003, 40 (7): e90-10.1136/jmg.40.7.e90.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swaroop A, Wang QL, Wu W, Cook J, Coats C, Xu S, Chen S, Zack DJ, Sieving PA: Leber congenital amaurosis caused by a homozygous mutation (R90W) in the homeodomain of the retinal transcription factor CRX: direct evidence for the involvement of CRX in the development of photoreceptor function. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8 (2): 299-305. 10.1093/hmg/8.2.299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson S, Halford S, Morris AG, Patel RJ, Wilkie SE, Hardcastle AJ, Moore AT, Zhang K, Hunt DM: Genomic organisation and alternative splicing of human RIM1, a gene implicated in autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy (CORD7). Genomics. 2003, 81 (3): 304-314. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00010-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi A, Higashide T, Hamasaki D, Kubota S, Sakuma H, An W, Fujimaki T, McLaren MJ, Weleber RG, Inana G: HRG4 (UNC119) mutation found in cone-rod dystrophy causes retinal degeneration in a transgenic model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41 (11): 3268-3277.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Briggs CE, Rucinski D, Rosenfeld PJ, Hirose T, Berson EL, Dryja TP: Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) in patients with Stargardt macular degeneration or cone-rod degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001, 42 (10): 2229-2236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ducroq D, Rozet JM, Gerber S, Perrault I, Barbet D, Hanein S, Hakiki S, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Hamel C, Kaplan J: The ABCA4 gene in autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophies. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 71 (6): 1480-1482. 10.1086/344829.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fishman GA, Stone EM, Eliason DA, Taylor CM, Lindeman M, Derlacki DJ: ABCA4 gene sequence variations in patients with autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003, 121 (6): 851-855. 10.1001/archopht.121.6.851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klevering BJ, Yzer S, Rohrschneider K, Zonneveld M, Allikmets R, van den Born LI, Maugeri A, Hoyng CB, Cremers FP: Microarray-based mutation analysis of the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene in autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004, 12 (12): 1024-1032. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maugeri A, Klevering BJ, Rohrschneider K, Blankenagel A, Brunner HG, Deutman AF, Hoyng CB, Cremers FP: Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene are the major cause of autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67 (4): 960-966. 10.1086/303079.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Papaioannou M, Ocaka L, Bessant D, Lois N, Bird A, Payne A, Bhattacharya S: An analysis of ABCR mutations in British patients with recessive retinal dystrophies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41 (1): 16-19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rozet JM, Gerber S, Souied E, Ducroq D, Perrault I, Ghazi I, Soubrane G, Coscas G, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J: The ABCR gene: a major disease gene in macular and peripheral retinal degenerations with onset from early childhood to the elderly. Mol Genet Metab. 1999, 68 (2): 310-315. 10.1006/mgme.1999.2925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Downes SM, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Payne AM, Warren MJ, Bhattacharya SS, Bird AC: Autosomal dominant cone and cone-rod dystrophy with mutations in the guanylate cyclase activator 1A gene-encoding guanylate cyclase activating protein-1. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119 (1): 96-105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakazawa M, Kikawa E, Chida Y, Wada Y, Shiono T, Tamai M: Autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy associated with mutations in codon 244 (Asn244His) and codon 184 (Tyr184Ser) of the peripherin/RDS gene. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996, 114 (1): 72-78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Demirci FY, Rigatti BW, Wen G, Radak AL, Mah TS, Baic CL, Traboulsi EI, Alitalo T, Ramser J, Gorin MB: X-linked cone-rod dystrophy (locus COD1): identification of mutations in RPGR exon ORF15. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70 (4): 1049-1053. 10.1086/339620.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hameed A, Abid A, Aziz A, Ismail M, Mehdi SQ, Khaliq S: Evidence of RPGRIP1 gene mutations associated with recessive cone-rod dystrophy. J Med Genet. 2003, 40 (8): 616-619. 10.1136/jmg.40.8.616.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sohocki MM, Perrault I, Leroy BP, Payne AM, Dharmaraj S, Bhattacharya SS, Kaplan J, Maumenee IH, Koenekoop R, Meire FM, Birch DG, Heckenlively JR, Daiger SP: Prevalence of AIPL1 mutations in inherited retinal degenerative disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2000, 70 (2): 142-150. 10.1006/mgme.2000.3001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelsell RE, Gregory-Evans K, Payne AM, Perrault I, Kaplan J, Yang RB, Garbers DL, Bird AC, Moore AT, Hunt DM: Mutations in the retinal guanylate cyclase (RETGC-1) gene in dominant cone-rod dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 1998, 7 (7): 1179-1184. 10.1093/hmg/7.7.1179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perrault I, Rozet JM, Gerber S, Kelsell RE, Souied E, Cabot A, Hunt DM, Munnich A, Kaplan J: A retGC-1 mutation in autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63 (2): 651-654. 10.1086/301985.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Warburg M, Sjo O, Tranebjaerg L, Fledelius HC: Deletion mapping of a retinal cone-rod dystrophy: assignment to 18q211. Am J Med Genet. 1991, 39 (3): 288-293. 10.1002/ajmg.1320390309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kylstra JA, Aylsworth AS: Cone-rod retinal dystrophy in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993, 28 (2): 79-80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khaliq S, Hameed A, Ismail M, Anwar K, Leroy BP, Mehdi SQ, Payne AM, Bhattacharya SS: Novel locus for autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy CORD8 mapping to chromosome 1q12-Q24. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41 (12): 3709-3712.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Danciger M, Hendrickson J, Lyon J, Toomes C, McHale JC, Fishman GA, Inglehearn CF, Jacobson SG, Farber DB: CORD9 a new locus for arCRD: mapping to 8p11, estimation of frequency, evaluation of a candidate gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001, 42 (11): 2458-2465.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zernant J, Kulm M, Dharmaraj S, den Hollander AI, Perrault I, Preising MN, Lorenz B, Kaplan J, Cremers FP, Maumenee I, Koenekoop RK, Allikmets R: Genotyping microarray (disease chip) for Leber congenital amaurosis: detection of modifier alleles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005, 46 (9): 3052-3059. 10.1167/iovs.05-0111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Clarke G, Collins RA, Leavitt BR, Andrews DF, Hayden MR, Lumsden CJ, McInnes RR: A one-hit model of cell death in inherited neuronal degenerations. Nature. 2000, 406 (6792): 195-199. 10.1038/35018098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarra GM, Stephens C, de Alwis M, Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Thrasher AJ, Ali RR: Gene replacement therapy in the retinal degeneration slow (rds) mouse: the effect on retinal degeneration following partial transduction of the retina. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (21): 2353-2361. 10.1093/hmg/10.21.2353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian P Hamel.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamel, C.P. Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2, 7 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: