Skip to content

Advertisement

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Review
Open Access

Biliary atresia

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20061:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-1-28

©  Chardot; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

Received: 06 June 2006

Accepted: 26 July 2006

Published: 26 July 2006

Abstract

Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare disease characterised by a biliary obstruction of unknown origin that presents in the neonatal period. It is the most frequent surgical cause of cholestatic jaundice in this age group. BA occurs in approximately 1/18,000 live births in Western Europe. In the world, the reported incidence varies from 5/100,000 to 32/100,000 live births, and is highest in Asia and the Pacific region. Females are affected slightly more often than males. The common histopathological picture is one of inflammatory damage to the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts with sclerosis and narrowing or even obliteration of the biliary tree. Untreated, this condition leads to cirrhosis and death within the first years of life. BA is not known to be a hereditary condition. No primary medical treatment is relevant for the management of BA. Once BA suspected, surgical intervention (Kasai portoenterostomy) should be performed as soon as possible as operations performed early in life is more likely to be successful. Liver transplantation may be needed later if the Kasai operation fails to restore the biliary flow or if cirrhotic complications occur. At present, approximately 90% of BA patients survive and the majority have normal quality of life.

Keywords

Bile DuctTransjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic ShuntBiliary AtresiaSitus InversusPorta Hepatis

Disease name

Biliary atresia

Definition

Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare disease characterised by a biliary obstruction of unknown origin that presents in the neonatal period [1].

Background

BA is the most frequent surgical cause of cholestatic jaundice in neonates. The common histopathological picture is one of inflammatory damage to the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts with sclerosis and narrowing or even obliteration of the biliary tree [2]. Untreated, this condition leads to cirrhosis and death within the first years of life. Surgical treatment usually involves an initial attempt to restore bile flow: the Kasai portoenterostomy [3], which is performed as soon after diagnosis as possible. Later, liver transplantation may be needed if the Kasai operation fails to restore the biliary flow or if cirrhosis complications occur [4]. BA remains the most common indication for paediatric liver transplantation worldwide.

Epidemiology

The reported incidence of BA varies from 5/100,000 live births in The Netherlands [5], 5.1/100,000 in France [6], 6/100,000 in the British Isles [7], 6.5/100,000 in Texas [8], 7/100,000 in Victoria Australia [9], 7.4/100,000 in Atlanta USA [10] and in Japan [11], 10.6/100,000 in Hawaii [12], to 32/100,000 in French Polynesia [13]. Incidence of BA is highest in Asia and the Pacific region. Females are affected slightly more often than males. Although some studies of time- and space-time distribution of BA cases have suggested seasonal variation and clustering of cases [8–10], these results have not been confirmed by larger studies [5, 6], [14, 15].

Anatomical forms

Two different forms of BA have been identified [16]:

• Syndromic BA (~10%), associated with various congenital anomalies such as polysplenia, asplenia, cardiac or intra abdominal defects (situs inversus, pre-duodenal portal vein, absence of retro-hepatic inferior vena cava, intestinal malrotation).

• Non-syndromic BA (~90%), in which BA is an isolated anomaly.

Several surgical classifications of BA have been proposed. The French classification is based on the anatomical pattern of the extrahepatic biliary tract remnant (Table 1) [17, 18].
Table 1

Anatomical types of biliary atresia (BA)

French classification

Frequency

Description

Upper level of obstruction of the extrahepatic bile ducts

US/UK/Japanese classification

Type 1

~3%

Atresia limited to the common bile duct

Common bile duct

Type 1

Type 2

~6%

Cyst in the liver hilum communicating with dystrophic intrahepatic bile ducts

Hepatic duct

Type 2

Type 3

19%

Gallbladder, cystic duct and common bile duct patent

Porta hepatis

Type 3

Type 4

72%

Complete extrahepatic BA

Porta hepatis

Type 3

Aetiology

The aetiology of BA remains unknown. Some cases seem to be related to abnormal morphogenesis of bile ducts occurring early in gestation, while others appear to arise from later damage to normally developing bile ducts.

There are several strands of evidence to suggest that even in non-syndromic BA, the onset takes place early in gestation. Antenatal ultrasonography allows detection of those forms of BA that show cystic changes [19]. In a series of 10 infants detected antenatally, most were non-syndromic and the first abnormal scans were observed at about 20 weeks of gestation [20]. In one study on serial digestive enzyme sampling in amniotic fluid, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (gamma-GTs) levels were found significantly low as early as 18 weeks of gestation in infants born with non-syndromic BA, providing strong evidence of biliary obstruction at this term of gestation [21].

Human embryo studies have also revealed similarities between the appearance of developing bile ducts during the first trimester of pregnancy and the residual ductules seen at porta hepatis level in BA patients; thus, it was suggested that some cases of BA may result from alteration of the remodelling process of the bile ducts originating from the ductal plate membrane [22]. The persistence of primitive foetal-type bile ducts that leak bile into surrounding tissues and induce a secondary inflammatory reaction in utero has also been suggested. Recent studies have focused on normal and altered bile duct morphogenesis [23, 24] and the initiation of hepatic fibrosis [25].

The role of viruses has been extensively studied. An association of BA with cytomegalovirus [26, 27], respiratory syncitial virus [28], Epstein-Barr virus [29] and human papilloma virus [30] has been reported. In contrast, no association with hepatitis A, B and C viruses has been found [31, 32]. Reovirus type 3 can cause cholangitis resembling BA in mice [33] and may be associated with spontaneous BA in the rhesus monkey [34]. In human neonates, the association of reovirus type 3 and BA has been suggested in several studies [35–38] but not supported in others [39–41]. Rotavirus type A can cause biliary obstruction in newborn mice, mimicking BA [42]; deleterious effects of rotavirus infection in mice can be prevented by interferon alpha [43]. In humans, the role of rotavirus type C in the aetiology of BA remains controversial [44, 45].

Several observations suggest that a genetic component plays a role in the pathogenesis of BA, although this is probably only one of multiple factors. Familial cases of BA have been reported [46–50] although discordant sets of monozygotic twins have also been observed [51–53]. Variations in the incidence of BA among different races have been reported from Hawaii [12] and Atlanta, USA [10]. The incidence of HLA B12 and haplotypes A9-B5 and A28-B35 was found to be higher in infants with BA compared to a control group in one UK study [54].

Clinical features

After birth, the clinical triad of BA is:

• Jaundice (conjugated hyperbilirubinemia lasting beyond two weeks of life)

• Acholic (white) stools and dark urine (Figure 1)

Figure 1
Figure 1

Acholic white stools.

• Hepatomegaly

The general condition of the child is usually good. There is no failure to thrive, at least in the first months. Thereafter, weight loss and irritability develop, accompanied by increasing levels of jaundice. Later signs include splenomegaly (suggesting portal hypertension), ascites and haemorrhage (which can be intracranial, gastrointestinal or from the umbilical stump) due to impaired absorption of vitamin K. Untreated, this condition leads to cirrhosis and death within the first years of life.

Diagnosis and diagnostic methods

Since early diagnosis appears essential for effective surgical treatment [17, 18], [55–57], every case of neonatal jaundice lasting more than two weeks should be investigated and biliary atresia actively excluded [58, 59]. Diagnosis is made on the basis of the clinical manifestations and is supported by the following diagnostic methods:

• Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography of the liver is performed after 12 hours of fasting (with an IV dextrose infusion). BA is suspected when the gallbladder is shrunk despite fasting, when the liver hilum appears hyperechogenic ("triangular cord sign") or when there is a cyst at the liver hilum. There should be no evidence of bile duct dilatation. Syndromic BA infants may show other features such as multiple spleens, preduodenal portal vein, absence of retrohepatic vena cava or abdominal situs inversus.

• Cholangiography

When the gallbladder seems normal on ultrasonography scans, cholangiography is needed to assess the morphology and patency of the biliary tree. A cholangiogram can be obtained percutaneously (puncture of the gallbladder), endoscopically (ERCP) or at operation.

• Liver biopsy

The main histological features suggestive of BA are bile plugs, ductular proliferation, portal oedema and/or fibrosis. As with any other cause of neonatal cholestasis, giant cell transformation may be observed.

• Others

Biochemical liver function tests show cholestasis (with elevated cholesterol and gamma-GTs). Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (e.g. HIDA scans) demonstrates a failure of excretion of the radioisotope into the intestine, but this feature can also be observed in any severe neonatal cholestasis [60].

Differential diagnosis

Medical causes of neonatal cholestasis must be excluded. The main differential diagnose are: Alagille syndrome, sclerosing cholangitis with neonatal onset, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, cystic fibrosis, and more rarely progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC).

In most cases, diagnosis of BA can be strongly suspected after consideration of the clinical features, ultrasonography scans and exclusion of the main medical causes of neonatal cholestasis. Cholangiography and/or liver biopsy are indicated only in cases where the diagnosis remains uncertain, especially when the gallbladder seems normal on ultrasonography scans [61, 62].

Antenatal diagnosis

Antenatal diagnosis of BA remains exceptional. BA Types 1 and 2, which are rare, can be suspected on antenatal ultrasonography scans when a cystic structure is detected in the liver hilum [19, 63]. Postnatal examination has to distinguish the cystic form of BA, which requires urgent surgery, from a choledocal cyst for which surgery may be delayed.

Non-visualization of the foetal gallbladder in early pregnancy (14–16 weeks gestation) may be associated with severe foetal anomalies, including polymalformation syndromes, chromosomal aberrations, cystic fibrosis [64]: amniocentesis is recommended for cystic fibrosis screening, hepatic enzymes tests and chromosomal analysis. Gallbladder may be visualised later in pregnancy, suggesting a delay in its recanalisation process. When the gallbladder remains undetectable after birth, the possibility that the patient has BA has to be carefully investigated. The incidence of agenesis of the gallbladder (without BA) is estimated at approximately 1/6000 pregnancies [64].

Features of polysplenia syndrome may be detected by antenatal ultrasonography. They may be part of a cardiosplenic syndrome whose prognosis depends mainly on the underlying cardiopathy [65, 66]. Interrupted inferior vena cava may be isolated and benign [67]. However, neonates with features of the polysplenia syndrome should be carefully followed in order to rule out BA.

Management

The current management of BA patients involves two steps:

• Kasai operation (in the neonatal period), which aims to restore bile flow.

• Liver transplantation in children for whom the Kasai operation has failed in its primary aim or for whom complications of biliary cirrhosis have supervened.

• The Kasai operation: hepatoporto-enterostomy

After transverse supra-umbilical incision and laparotomy, diagnosis is confirmed by inspection of the liver and biliary tract. In most cases (type 4: complete extrahepatic BA), diagnosis is obvious with a cholestatic or fibrotic liver and a shrunken fibrotic gallbladder (Figure 2). If the gallbladder is still patent or if there is a cyst at the liver hilum, the colour of their content is noted and cholangiography is performed. Features of polysplenia syndrome, as well as any other intra-abdominal anomaly, are noted. The portal pressure can be measured through a small catheter introduced via the umbilical vein. After section of the falciform, left and right triangular ligaments, the liver is exteriorised out of the abdominal cavity. The entire extrahepatic biliary tree is excised together with the fibrous tissue occupying the space between the left and right branches of the portal vein at the level of the porta hepatis. A 45 cm Roux-en-Y loop is prepared and passed through the mesocolon to the liver hilum. An anastomosis is fashioned between the cut edge of the transsected tissue in the porta hepatis and the antimesenteric side of the Roux loop (Figure 3). A liver biopsy is performed.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Operative view of complete extrahepatic biliary atresia.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Hepatoporto-enterostomy (Kasai procedure) [68]*. * Valayer J, Chardot C: Atrésie des voies biliaires. Encycl Méd Chir (Elsevier SAS, Paris, All rights reserved), Techniques chirurgicales – appareil digestif (40–890); 2002: p. 12. Reproduction authorized by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Many technical variants are possible, according to the anatomical pattern of the biliary remnant:

• Type 1 BA: cholecysto-enterostomy, or hepatico-enterostomy.

• Type 2 BA: cysto-enterostomy. This operation can be performed only if the hilar cyst communicates with the dystrophic intrahepatic bile ducts (as shown at cholangiography).

• Type 3 BA: hepatoporto-cholecystostomy. The patent galbladder, cystic duct and common bile duct are preserved. The gallbladder is mobilised with preservation of its pedicle. An anastomosis is performed between the gallbladder and the transsected tissue in the porta hepatis (Figure 4). Since there is no direct contact between the porta hepatis and the intestine, this operation reduces the risk of post-operative cholangitis [57]. Its specific complications, however, are bile leaks and post-operative biliary ascites caused by kinking and obstruction of the cystic duct and the common bile duct [69–71].

Figure 4
Figure 4

Hepatoporto-cholecystostomy [68]*. * Valayer J, Chardot C: Atrésie des voies biliaires. Encycl Méd Chir (Elsevier SAS, Paris, All rights reserved), Techniques chirurgicales – appareil digestif (40–890); 2002: p. 12. Reproduction authorized by Elsevier Masson SAS.

• Post-operative course

Post-operatively, different drugs have been proposed either for reducing the inflammatory process at the liver hilum, which might lead to granulation and fibrous scar obstructing the biliary ductules, or for increasing the biliary flow. Although recommended by several surgeons [72–74], the use of corticosteroids remains controversial since their long-term benefit has not been proven; in addition there is a theoretical risk of exacerbating cholangitis. During the evaluation phase of biliary atresia, the infant's diet typically is not changed; post-operative breastfeeding is encouraged when possible, but an energetic supplementation may be required to obtain a 150 to 180 Kcal/kg/day intake. As long as cholestasis persists, supplementation in fat-soluble vitamins (ADEK) is needed.

Outcome after successful Kasai operation

If the Kasai operation succeeds in restoring bile flow, the stools become coloured and jaundice fades. This process may last several weeks or months. The evolution of the biliary cirrhosis is prevented or at least delayed; survival with the native liver has been reported up to adulthood (Figure 5) [75, 76].
Figure 5
Figure 5

Survival with native liver of 271 infants who underwent Kasai operation for biliary atresia between 1968 and 1983 at Bicêtre hospital (Paris) [75]*. * Lykavieris P, Chardot C, Sokhn M, Gauthier F, Valayer J, Bernard O: Outcome in adulthood of biliary atresia: a study of 63 patients who survived for over 20 years with their native liver. Hepatology 2005, 41: p. 367. Reproduction authorized by John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

The most common complications following the Kasai procedure include:

• Cholangitis

Direct communication of the intestine with the dystrophic intrahepatic bile ducts, together with poor bile flow, can cause an ascending bacterial cholangitis. This occurs particularly in the first weeks or months after the Kasai procedure in 30%-60% of cases [77, 78]. This infection may be severe and sometimes fulminant. There are signs of sepsis (fever or hypothermia, impaired haemodynamic status), recurrent jaundice, acholic stools and perhaps abdominal pain. Diagnosis can be confirmed by analysis of blood cultures and/or liver biopsies [78]. Treatment requires IV antibiotics and effective IV resuscitation. In the cases with recurrent and/or late cholangitis, obstruction of the Roux en Y loop or persisting colonisation of intrabiliary cyst should be considered. Recurrent cholangitis without a "surgical" cause may require continuous antibiotic prophylaxis.

• Portal hypertension

Portal hypertension occurs in at least two-thirds of the children after porto-enterostomy [79, 80], even in those with complete restoration of bile flow. The most common sites of varices include the oesophagus, stomach, Roux loop and anorectum. If the Kasai operation has clearly failed and the patient displays poor biochemical liver function and persisting jaundice, then liver transplantation is indicated. However, variceal sclerotherapy or band ligation before liver replacement may be necessary. In those cases with good liver function and absence of jaundice, endoscopic therapy may be the only treatment necessary [81, 82]. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are rarely used for this indication due to the young age of the patients, the frequently observed hypoplasia of the portal vein and the possible development of intrahepatic biliary cavities [83]. Surgical portosystemic shunts are nowadays rarely indicated, especially when transplantation is available, but should be considered when there is a normal liver function, non-progressive liver disease and life-threatening varices [84]. Severe hypersplenism may exceptionally require splenic artery embolisation [85].

• Hepatopulmonary syndrome and pulmonary hypertension

Similarly to patients with other causes of spontaneous (cirrhosis or prehepatic portal hypertension) or acquired (surgical) portosystemic shunts, pulmonary arteriovenous shunts may occur even after complete clearance of jaundice (hepatopulmonary syndrome). Gut-derived vasoactive substances that are not cleared by the liver (due to the portosystemic shunts) may be responsible for this complication. Typically, hepatopulmonary syndrome causes hypoxia, cyanosis, dyspnoea and digital clubbing. Diagnosis is confirmed by pulmonary scintigraphy. Pulmonary hypertension can occur in cirrhotic children and may provoke syncope or even sudden death. Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension is suggested by echocardiography. Liver transplantation reverses pulmonary shunts [86] and can reverse pulmonary hypertension (especially when diagnosed at an early stage) [87].

• Intrahepatic biliary cavities

Large intrahepatic biliary cysts may develop several months to years after the Kasai operation, even in patients with complete clearance of jaundice. These cavities may become infected and/or may compress the portal vein, requiring external drainage. Cystoenterostomy [88] or liver transplantation may eventually be required.

• Malignancies

Hepatocarcinomas, hepatoblastomas [89] and cholangiocarcinomas [90] have been described in the cirrhotic livers of patients with BA, in childhood or adulthood. Screening for malignancy has to be performed regularly in the follow-up of patients who underwent a successful Kasai operation.

Outcome after unsuccessful Kasai operation

If the Kasai operation fails to restore the bile flow, biliary cirrhosis progresses and necessitates liver transplantation. This is usually performed in the second year of life but may be necessary earlier (from 6 months of life) when there is a rapid aggravation of the liver disease. BA represents more than half of the indications for liver transplantation in childhood. Transplantation may also be required in those cases where recurrence of jaundice (secondary failure of the Kasai operation) or complications of cirrhosis (e.g. hepatopulmonary syndrome) occur despite an initially successful outcome after the Kasai operation.

There are two sources of liver grafts:

• Cadaveric donor: the graft is rarely a full size liver taken from a size-matched paediatric donor. More commonly, the graft consists of a left lobe (segments 2+3) or a left liver (2+3+4) obtained after reduction or splitting of an adult liver graft.

• Living-related donor: usually from one of the parents of the child.

Currently, patient survival at 5 and 10 years after liver transplantation is more than 80% [91–94]. In most cases, the quality of life of the transplanted patient is close to normal. Normal somatic growth pattern and physical, sexual and intellectual maturity are usually achieved [95–97].

Overall outcome of BA patients

The overall prognosis of BA patients has improved since the early days of paediatric liver transplantation. Nowadays about 90% of BA patients may hope to survive (Table 2), with a normal quality of life for most of them.
Table 2

Current prognosis of BA in France and the United Kingdom.

 

France 1997–2002 (271 patients)

UK 1999–2002 (148 patients) [98]

Overall 4-year patient survival

87%

89%

4-year survival with native liver after Kasai operation

43%

51%

4-year survival after liver transplantation

89%

90%

Several prognostic factors have been identified in BA patients. Some of them are related to characteristics of the disease (and cannot be altered): the prognosis of the Kasai operation is worse when BA is associated with a polysplenia syndrome [17, 18, 99]; when macroscopic obstructive lesions of extra-hepatic biliary remnant are diffuse (prognosis worsens from type 1 to type 4) [17, 55–57]; when histological obliteration of the bile ducts (especially at porta hepatis) is more severe [100, 101]; and when liver fibrosis is more extensive at time of the Kasai operation (102–107). Other prognostic factors are related to the management of BA patients and can be improved:

• the chances of success of the Kasai operation decrease when the age at Kasai operation increases [17, 55, 57, 59]. It is, therefore, very important to diagnose BA early.

• accessibility to liver transplantation [108]: the mortality while waiting for a liver graft has recently decreased due to the development of surgical techniques that increase the availability of liver grafts: liver graft splitting [109], living related liver donation [110].

• experience of the centre managing BA patients [7, 17, 111]. This point led the British health authorities to centralise all BA patients from England and Wales in three paediatric liver units [98]. In France, a collaborative policy between centres was promoted and a national observatory of BA was created, in order to standardize therapeutic results nationwide and evaluate the results of this decentralized management.

Conclusion

With the sequential treatment including the Kasai operation in the first weeks of life and, in case of failure of this procedure, secondary liver transplantation, 90% of patients with BA can nowadays survive, with a normal quality of life for most of them. Early diagnosis and treatment by an experienced team provides children with the best chance of survival.

Links

French Observatory of Biliary Atresia: http://www.orpha.net/nestasso/OFAVB

European Federation for Biliary Atresia Research: http://www.orpha.net/nestasso/EFBAR

European Biliary Atresia Registry: http://www.biliary-atresia.com

Biliary Atresia Research Consortium: http://www.barcnetwork.org

Declarations

Acknowledgements

To paediatricians and surgeons of the 45 centres participating in the studies of the French Observatory of Biliary Atresia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Genève, Geneve, Switzerland

References

  1. Alagille D: Extrahepatic biliary atresia. Hepatology. 1984, 4 (1 Suppl): 7S-10S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gautier M, Eliot N: Extrahepatic biliary atresia. Morphological study of 98 biliary remnants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1981, 105: 397-402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kasai M, Kimura S, Asakura Y, Suzuki Y, Taira Y, Obashi E: Surgical treatment of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1968, 3: 665-675. 10.1016/0022-3468(68)90897-X.Google Scholar
  4. Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R, Hausleithner V, Sokal E, Chardot C, Debande B: Sequential treatment of biliary atresia with Kasai portoenterostomy and liver transplantation: a review. Hepatology. 1994, 20 (1 Pt 2): 41S-48S. 10.1016/0270-9139(94)90272-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Houwen RH, Kerremans I, van Steensel-Moll HA, van Romunde LK, Bijleveld CM, Schweizer P: Time-space distribution of extrahepatic biliary atresia in The Netherlands and West Germany. Z Kinderchir. 1988, 43: 68-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chardot C, Carton M, Spire-Bendelac N, Le Pommelet C, Golmard JL, Auvert B: Epidemiology of biliary atresia in France: a national study 1986–96. J Hepatol. 1999, 31: 1006-1013. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80312-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. McKiernan PJ, Baker AJ, Kelly DA: The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet. 2000, 355: 25-29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03492-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Strickland AD, Shannon K: Studies in the etiology of extrahepatic biliary atresia: time-space clustering. J Pediatr. 1982, 100: 749-753. 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80576-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Danks DM, Campbell PE, Jack I, Rogers J, Smith AL: Studies of the aetiology of neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia. Arch Dis Child. 1977, 52: 360-367.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoon PW, Bresee JS, Olney RS, James LM, Khoury MJ: Epidemiology of biliary atresia: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 1997, 99: 376-382. 10.1542/peds.99.3.376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiba T, Ohi R, Kamiyama T, Nio M, Ibrahim M: Japanese biliary atresia registry. Biliary atresia. Edited by: Ohi R. 1991, Tokyo (Japan): ICOM Associates, 79-86.Google Scholar
  12. Shim WK, Kasai M, Spence MA: Racial influence on the incidence of biliary atresia. Prog Pediatr Surg. 1974, 6: 53-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vic P, Gestas P, Mallet EC, Arnaud JP: Atrésie des voies biliaires en Polynésie française. Etude rétrospective de 10 ans. Arch Pediatr. 1994, 1: 646-651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ayas MF, Hillemeier AC, Olson AD: Lack of evidence for seasonal variation in extrahepatic biliary atresia during infancy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996, 22: 292-294. 10.1097/00004836-199606000-00010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davenport M, Dhawan A: Epidemiologic study of infants with biliary atresia. Pediatrics. 1998, 101: 729-230. 10.1542/peds.101.4.729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard ER: Biliary atresia. Pediatric surgery and urology: long term outcomes. Edited by: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE, Howard ER. 1998, London: WB Saunders, 402-416.Google Scholar
  17. Chardot C, Carton M, Spire-Bendelac N, Le Pommelet C, Golmard JL, Auvert B: Prognosis of biliary atresia in the era of liver transplantation: French national study from 1986 to 1996. Hepatology. 1999, 30: 606-611. 10.1002/hep.510300330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauthier F, Luciani JL, Chardot C, Branchereau S, de Dreuzy O, Lababidi A, Montupet P, Dubousset AM, Huault G, Bernard O, Valayer J: Determinants of life span after Kasai operation at the era of liver transplantation. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1997, 181: 97-107. 10.1620/tjem.181.97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brunero M, De Dreuzy O, Herrera JM, Gauthier F, Valayer L: Prenatal detection of a cyst in the liver hilum. Interpretation for an adequate treatment. Minerva Pediatr. 1996, 48: 485-494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinds R, Davenport M, Mieli-Vergani G, Hadzic N: Antenatal presentation of biliary atresia. J Pediatr. 2004, 144: 43-46. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller F, Oury JF, Dumez Y, Boue J, Boue A: Microvillar enzyme assays in amniotic fluid and fetal tissues at different stages of development. Prenat Diagn. 1988, 8: 189-198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tan CE, Driver M, Howard ER, Moscoso GJ: Extrahepatic biliary atresia: a first-trimester event? Clues from light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. J Pediatr Surg. 1994, 29: 808-814. 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90144-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Desmet VJ: Ludwig symposium on biliary disorders-part I. Pathogenesis of ductal plate abnormalities. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998, 73: 80-89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazziotti MV, Willis LK, Heuckeroth RO, LaRegina MC, Swanson PE, Overbeek PA, Perlmutter DH: Anomalous development of the hepatobiliary system in the Inv mouse. epatology. 1999, 30: H372-378. 10.1002/hep.510300223.Google Scholar
  25. Ramm GA, Nair VG, Bridle KR, Shepherd RW, Crawford DH: Contribution of hepatic parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells to hepatic fibrogenesis in biliary atresia. Am J Pathol. 1998, 153: 527-535.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischler B, Ehrnst A, Forsgren M, Orvell C, Nemeth A: The viral association of neonatal cholestasis in Sweden: a possible link between cytomegalovirus infection and extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998, 27: 57-64. 10.1097/00005176-199807000-00010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart MH, Kaufman SS, Vanderhoof JA, Erdman S, Linder J, Markin RS, Kruger R, Antonson DL: Neonatal hepatitis and extrahepatic biliary atresia associated with cytomegalovirus infection in twins. Am J Dis Child. 1991, 145: 302-305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nadal D, Wunderli W, Meurmann O, Briner J, Hirsig J: Isolation of respiratory syncytial virus from liver tissue and extrahepatic biliary atresia material. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990, 22: 91-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Weaver LT, Nelson R, Bell TM: The association of extrahepatic bile duct atresia and neonatal Epstein-Barr virus infection. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1984, 73: 155-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Drut R, Drut RM, Gomez MA, Cueto Rua E, Lojo MM: Presence of human papillomavirus in extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998, 27: 530-535. 10.1097/00005176-199811000-00007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. A-Kader HH, Nowicki MJ, Kuramoto KI, Baroudy B, Zeldis JB, Balistreri WF: Evaluation of the role of hepatitis C virus in biliary atresia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994, 13: 657-649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Balistreri WF, Tabor E, Gerety RJ: Negative serology for hepatitis A and B viruses in 18 cases of neonatal cholestasis. Pediatrics. 1980, 66: 269-271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bangaru B, Morecki R, Glaser JH, Gartner LM, Horwitz MS: Comparative studies of biliary atresia in the human newborn and reovirus-induced cholangitis in weanling mice. Lab Invest. 1980, 43: 456-462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg DP, Morecki R, Lollini LO, Glaser J, Cornelius CE: Extrahepatic biliary atresia in a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Hepatology. 1983, 3: 577-580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser JH, Balistreri WF, Morecki R: Role of reovirus type 3 in persistent infantile cholestasis. J Pediatr. 1984, 105: 912-915. 10.1016/S0022-3476(84)80076-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Morecki R, Glaser JH, Cho S, Balistreri WF, Horwitz MS: Biliary atresia and reovirus type 3 infection. N Engl J Med. 1982, 307: 481-484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morecki R, Glaser JH, Johnson AB, Kress Y: Detection of reovirus type 3 in the porta hepatis of an infant with extrahepatic biliary atresia: ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study. Hepatology. 1984, 4: 1137-1142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tyler KL, Sokol RJ, Oberhaus SM, Le M, Karrer FM, Narkewicz MR, Tyson RW, Murphy JR, Low R, Brown WR: Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. Hepatology. 1998, 27: 1475-1482. 10.1002/hep.510270603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Brown WR, Sokol RJ, Levin MJ, Silverman A, Tamaru T, Lilly JR, Hall RJ, Cheney M: Lack of correlation between infection with reovirus 3 and extrahepatic biliary atresia or neonatal hepatitis. J Pediatr. 1988, 113: 670-676. 10.1016/S0022-3476(88)80376-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dussaix E, Hadchouel M, Tardieu M, Alagille D: Biliary atresia and reovirus type 3 infection. N Engl J Med. 1984, 310: 658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Steele MI, Marshall CM, Lloyd RE, Randolph VE: Reovirus 3 not detected by reverse transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction analysis of preserved tissue from infants with cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology. 1995, 21: 697-702. 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90520-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Petersen C, Biermanns D, Kuske M, Schakel K, Meyer-Junghanel L, Mildenberger H: New aspects in a murine model for extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1997, 32: 1190-1195. 10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90680-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Petersen C, Bruns E, Kuske M, von Wussow P: Treatment of extrahepatic biliary atresia with interferon-alpha in a murine infectious model. Pediatr Res. 1997, 42: 623-628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Bobo L, Ojeh C, Chiu D, Machado A, Colombani P, Schwarz K: Lack of evidence for rotavirus by polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassay of hepatobiliary samples from children with biliary atresia. Pediatr Res. 1997, 41: 229-234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Riepenhoff-Talty M, Gouvea V, Evans MJ, Svensson L, Hoffenberg E, Sokol RJ, Uhnoo I, Greenberg SJ, Schakel K, Zhaori G, Fitzgerald J, Chong S, el-Yousef M, Nemeth A, Brown M, Piccoli D, Hyams J, Ruffin D, Rossi T: Detection of group C rotavirus in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174: 8-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Cunningham ML, Sybert VP: Idiopathic extrahepatic biliary atresia: recurrence in sibs in two families. Am J Med Genet. 1988, 31: 421-426. 10.1002/ajmg.1320310222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gunasekaran TS, Hassall EG, Steinbrecher UP, Yong SL: Recurrence of extrahepatic biliary atresia in two half sibs. Am J Med Genet. 1992, 43: 592-594. 10.1002/ajmg.1320430317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lachaux A, Descos B, Plauchu H, Wright C, Louis D, Raveau J, Hermier M: Familial extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988, 7: 280-283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Silveira TR, Salzano FM, Howard ER, Mowat AP: Extrahepatic biliary atresia and twinning. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1991, 24: 67-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith BM, Laberge JM, Schreiber R, Weber AM, Blanchard H: Familial biliary atresia in three siblings including twins. J Pediatr Surg. 1991, 26: 1331-1333. 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90613-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hyams JS, Glaser JH, Leichtner AM, Morecki R: Discordance for biliary atresia in two sets of monozygotic twins. J Pediatr. 1985, 107: 420-422. 10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80524-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Poovorawan Y, Chongsrisawat V, Tanunytthawongse C, Norapaksunthorn T, Mutirangura A, Chandrakamol B: Extrahepatic biliary atresia in twins: zygosity determination by short tandem repeat loci. J Med Assoc Thai. 1996, 79 (Suppl 1): S119-S124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Strickland AD, Shannon K, Coln CD: Biliary atresia in two sets of twins. J Pediatr. 1985, 107: 418-420. 10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80523-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Silveira TR, Salzano FM, Donaldson PT, Mieli-Vergani G, Howard ER, Mowat AP: Association between HLA and extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993, 16: 114-117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Altman RP, Lilly JR, Greenfeld J, Weinberg A, van Leeuwen K, Flanigan L: A multivariable risk factor analysis of the portoenterostomy (Kasai) procedure for biliary atresia: twenty-five years of experience from two centers. Ann Surg. 1997, 226: 348-355. 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00014.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ibrahim M, Miyano T, Ohi R, Saeki M, Shiraki K, Tanaka K, Kamiyama T, Nio M: Japanese Biliary Atresia Registry, 1989 to 1994. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1997, 181: 85-95. 10.1620/tjem.181.85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Karrer FM, Lilly JR, Stewart BA, Hall RJ: Biliary atresia registry, 1976 to 1989. J Pediatr Surg. 1990, 25: 1076-1081. 10.1016/0022-3468(90)90222-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Bernard O: Plaidoyer pour un diagnostic précoce de l'atrésie des voies biliaires. Douze erreurs à éviter. Arch Pediatr. 1995, 2: 937-939. 10.1016/0929-693X(96)89888-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mieli-Vergani G, Howard ER, Portman B, Mowat AP: Late referral for biliary atresia – missed opportunities for effective surgery. Lancet. 1989, 1: 421-423. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90012-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Spivak W, Sarkar S, Winter D, Glassman M, Donlon E, Tucker KJ: Diagnostic utility of hepatobiliary scintigraphy with 99mTc-DISIDA in neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr. 1987, 110: 855-861. 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80396-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bernard O: Diagnostic précoce des cholestases néonatales. Arch Pediatr. 1998, 5: 1031-1035. 10.1016/S0929-693X(98)80020-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Bernard O, Gauthier F: Progrès récents en hépatologie pédiatrique. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1991, 48: 53-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Redkar R, Davenport M, Howard ER: Antenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the biliary tract. J Pediatr Surg. 1998, 33: 700-704. 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90190-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Blazer S, Zimmer EZ, Bronshtein M: Nonvisualization of the fetal gallbladder in early pregnancy: comparison with clinical outcome. Radiology. 2002, 224: 379-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Berg C, Geipel A, Smrcek J, Krapp M, Germer U, Kohl T, Gembruch U, Baschat AA: Prenatal diagnosis of cardiosplenic syndromes: a 10-year experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 22: 451-459. 10.1002/uog.904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Abuhamad AZ, Robinson JN, Bogdan D, Tannous RJ: Color Doppler of the splenic artery in the prenatal diagnosis of heterotaxic syndromes. Am J Perinatol. 1999, 16: 469-473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Celentano C, Malinger G, Rotmensch S, Gerboni S, Wolman Y, Glezerman M: Prenatal diagnosis of interrupted inferior vena cava as an isolated finding: a benign vascular malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 14: 215-218. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14030215.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Valayer J, Chardot C: Atrésie des voies biliaires. Encyclopédie Médico Chirurgicale. Techniques chirurgicales – appareil digestif (40–890);. 2002, 1-11.Google Scholar
  69. Freitas L, Gauthier F, Valayer J: Second operation for repair of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1987, 22: 857-860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lilly JR: Hepatic portocholecystostomy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1979, 14: 301-314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Lilly JR, Stellin G: Catheter decompression of hepatic portocholecystostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 1982, 17: 904-905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Altman RP, Anderson KD: Surgical management of intractable cholangitis following successful Kasai procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1982, 17: 894-900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Karrer FM, Lilly JR: Corticosteroid therapy in biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1985, 20: 693-695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kasai M, Suzuki H, Ohashi E, Ohi R, Chiba T, Okamoto A: Technique and results of operative management of biliary atresia. World J Surg. 1978, 2: 571-579. 10.1007/BF01556048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Lykavieris P, Chardot C, Sokhn M, Gauthier F, Valayer J, Bernard O: Outcome in adulthood of biliary atresia: a study of 63 patients who survived for over 20 years with their native liver. Hepatology. 2005, 41: 366-371. 10.1002/hep.20547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Ohi R, Nio M, Chiba T, Endo N, Goto M, Ibrahim M: Long-term follow-up after surgery for patients with biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1990, 25: 442-445. 10.1016/0022-3468(90)90390-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Burnweit CA, Coln D: Influence of diversion on the development of cholangitis after hepatoportoenterostomy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1986, 21: 1143-1146. 10.1016/0022-3468(86)90028-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ecoffey C, Rothman E, Bernard O, Hadchouel M, Valayer J, Alagille D: Bacterial cholangitis after surgery for biliary atresia. J Pediatr. 1987, 111: 824-849. 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80195-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kasai M, Okamoto A, Ohi R, Yabe K, Matsumura Y: Changes of portal vein pressure and intrahepatic blood vessels after surgery for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1981, 16: 152-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ohi R, Mochizuki I, Komatsu K, Kasai M: Portal hypertension after successful hepatic portoenterostomy in biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1986, 21: 271-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Sasaki T, Hasegawa T, Nakajima K, Tanano H, Wasa M, Fukui Y, Okada A: Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1998, 33: 1628-1632. 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90595-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Stringer MD, Howard ER, Mowat AP: Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the management of esophageal varices in 61 children with biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1989, 24: 438-442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Rossle M, Siegerstetter V, Huber M, Ochs A: The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art. Liver. 1998, 18: 73-89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Valayer J, Branchereau S: Portal hypertension: porto systemic shunts. Pediatric surgery and urology: long term outcomes. Edited by: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE, Howard ER. 1998, London: W.B. Saunders, 439-446.Google Scholar
  85. Chiba T, Ohi R, Yaoita M: Partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism in pediatric patients with special reference to its long-term efficacy. Biliary atresia. Edited by: Ohi R. 1991, Tokyo: ICOM Associates Inc, 154-158.Google Scholar
  86. Yonemura T, Yoshibayashi M, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Tanaka K, Furusho K: Intrapulmonary shunting in biliary atresia before and after living-related liver transplantation. Br J Surg. 1999, 86: 1139-1143. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01207.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Losay J, Piot D, Bougaran J, Ozier Y, Devictor D, Houssin D, Bernard O: Early liver transplantation is crucial in children with liver disease and pulmonary artery hypertension. J Hepatol. 1998, 28: 337-342. 10.1016/0168-8278(88)80022-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Tsuchida Y, Honna T, Kawarasaki H: Cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary system in biliary atresia after hepatic portoenterostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 1994, 29: 630-634. 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90728-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tatekawa Y, Asonuma K, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Tanaka K: Liver transplantation for biliary atresia associated with malignant hepatic tumors. J Pediatr Surg. 2001, 36: 436-439. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.21600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Kulkarni PB, Beatty E: Cholangiocarcinoma associated with biliary cirrhosis due to congenital biliary atresia. Am J Dis Child. 1977, 131: 442-444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Bourdeaux C, Tri TT, Gras J, Sokal E, Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R: PELD score and posttransplant outcome in pediatric liver transplantation: a retrospective study of 100 recipients. Transplantation. 2005, 79: 1273-1276. 10.1097/00007890-200505150-00060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Diem HV, Evrard V, Vinh HT, Sokal EM, Janssen M, Otte JB, Reding R: Pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia: results of primary grafts in 328 recipients. Transplantation. 2003, 75: 1692-1697. 10.1097/01.TP.0000062570.83203.A3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Fouquet V, Alves A, Branchereau S, Grabar S, Debray D, Jacquemin E, Devictor D, Durand P, Baujard C, Fabre M, Pariente D, Chardot C, Dousset B, Massault PP, Bernard D, Houssin D, Bernard O, Gauthier F, Soubrane O: Long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia: a 10-year follow-up in a single center. Liver Transpl. 2005, 11: 152-160. 10.1002/lt.20358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Utterson EC, Shepherd RW, Sokol RJ, Bucuvalas J, Magee JC, McDiarmid SV, Anand R, The Split Research Group: Biliary atresia: clinical profiles, risk factors, and outcomes of 755 patients listed for liver transplantation. J Pediatr. 2005, 147: 180-185. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Asonuma K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Egawa H, Kiuchi T, Okajima H, Shapiro AM, Tanaka K: Growth and quality of life after living-related liver transplantation in children. Pediatr Transplant. 1998, 2: 64-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Codoner-Franch P, Bernard O, Alvarez F: Long-term follow-up of growth in height after successful liver transplantation. J Pediatr. 1994, 124: 368-373. 10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70357-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Midgley DE, Bradlee TA, Donohoe C, Kent KP, Alonso EM: Health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000, 6: 333-639. 10.1053/lv.2000.6139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Davenport M, De Ville de Goyet J, Stringer MD, Mieli-Vergani G, Kelly DA, McClean P, Spitz L: Seamless management of biliary atresia in England and Wales (1999–2002). Lancet. 2004, 363: 1354-1357. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16045-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Vazquez J, Lopez Gutierrez JC, Gamez M, Lopez-Santamaria M, Murcia J, Larrauri J, Diaz MC, Jara P, Tovar JA: Biliary atresia and the polysplenia syndrome: its impact on final outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 1995, 30: 485-487. 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90062-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Schweizer P, Kirschner HJ, Schittenhelm C: Anatomy of the porta hepatis (PH) as rational basis for the hepatoporto-enterostomy (HPE). Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999, 9: 13-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tan CE, Davenport M, Driver M, Howard ER: Does the morphology of the extrahepatic biliary remnants in biliary atresia influence survival? A review of 205 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1994, 29: 1459-1464. 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90144-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Ohya T, Miyano T, Kimura K: Indication for portoenterostomy based on 103 patients with Suruga II modification. J Pediatr Surg. 1990, 25: 801-804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Schweizer P, Schweizer M, Schellinger K, Kirschner HJ, Schittenhelm C: Prognosis of extrahepatic bile-duct atresia after hepatoportoenterostomy. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000, 16: 351-355. 10.1007/s003830000385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Tanano H, Hasegawa T, Kimura T, Sasaki T, Kawahara H, Kubota A, Okada A: Proposal of fibrosis index using image analyzer as a quantitative histological evaluation of liver fibrosis in biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003, 19: 52-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Vazquez-Estevez J, Stewart B, Shikes RH, Hall RJ, Lilly JR: Biliary atresia: early determination of prognosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1989, 24: 48-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Weerasooriya VS, White FV, Shepherd RW: Hepatic fibrosis and survival in biliary atresia. J Pediatr. 2004, 144: 123-125. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wildhaber BE, Coran AG, Drongowski RA, Hirschl RB, Geiger JD, Lelli JL, Teitelbaum DH: The Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: A review of a 27-year experience with 81 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2003, 38: 1480-1485. 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00499-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Nio M, Ohi R, Miyano T, Saeki M, Shiraki K, Tanaka K: Five- and 10-year survival rates after surgery for biliary atresia: a report from the Japanese Biliary Atresia Registry. J Pediatr Surg. 2003, 38: 997-1000. 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00178-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Gridelli B, Spada M, Petz W, Bertani A, Lucianetti A, Colledan M, Altobelli M, Alberti D, Guizzetti M, Riva S, Melzi ML, Stroppa P, Torre G: Split-liver transplantation eliminates the need for living-donor liver transplantation in children with end-stage cholestatic liver disease. Transplantation. 2003, 75: 1197-1203. 10.1097/01.TP.0000061940.96949.A1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Reding R, Chardot C, Paul K, Veyckemans F, Van Obbergh L, De Clety SC, Detaille T, Clapuyt P, Saint-Martin C, Janssen M, Lerut J, Sokal E, Otte JB: Living-related liver transplantation in children at Saint-Luc University Clinics: a seven year experience in 77 recipients. Acta Chir Belg. 2001, 101: 17-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. McClement JW, Howard ER, Mowat AP: Results of surgical treatment for extrahepatic biliary atresia in United Kingdom 1980-2. Survey conducted on behalf of the British Paediatric Association Gastroenterology Group and the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985, 290: 345-347.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Chardot; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

ISSN: 1750-1172