Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of Short Form-36 (SF36) scores in patients with lipodystrophy to the population norms of the SF36 Health Survey in Turkey

From: Impact of lipodystrophy on health-related quality of life: the QuaLip study

Population Normal Levels (Men)

SF36 Components in Men with Lipodystrophy at Visit 1

SF36 Components in Men with Lipodystrophy at Visit 9

SF36

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

p (vs. Normal Population)

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

p (vs. Normal Population)

PF

87.2

17.10

609

75.77

20.80

13

0.018

77.27

25.82

11

0.102

RP

89.8

19.30

609

65.38

42.73

13

0.062

79.54

40.02

11

0.198

BP

85.1

16.40

609

60.54

28.50

13

0.006

78.78

40.20

11

0.301

GH

73.6

14.70

609

48.62

23.59

13

0.121

58.63

24.40

11

0.021

VT

65.7

11.90

609

55.77

31.81

13

0.002

76.13

28.75

11

0.889

SF

91.7

12.80

609

70.19

24.23

13

0.008

70.09

27.86

11

0.005

RE

92.8

15.10

609

56.41

39.40

13

0.009

60.00

17.06

11

 < 0.001

MH

71.0

10.60

609

63.08

16.42

13

0.283

41.81

31.83

11

0.001

Population Normal Levels (Women)

SF36 Components in Women with Lipodsytrophy at Visit 1

SF36 Components in Women with Lipodsytrophy at Visit 9

SF-36

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

p (vs. Normal Population)

Mean

Std. Deviation

n

p (vs. Normal Population)

PF

80.6

21.70

670

62.13

26.49

54

 < 0.001

57.33

30.98

45

 < 0.001

RP

82.9

28.60

670

43.19

39.77

54

 < 0.001

51.11

48.25

45

 < 0.001

BP

81.0

20.20

670

57.65

31.42

54

 < 0.001

61.62

28.70

45

 < 0.001

GH

69.1

16.90

670

37.63

22.12

54

 < 0.001

39.73

24.24

45

 < 0.001

VT

63.4

13.70

670

48.06

22.75

54

 < 0.001

45.44

25.35

45

 < 0.001

SF

90.1

12.90

670

61.56

29.32

54

 < 0.001

59.44

30.05

45

 < 0.001

RE

89.0

22.50

670

44.00

40.66

54

 < 0.001

57.03

47.47

45

 < 0.001

MH

70.1

11.40

670

58.04

20.14

54

 < 0.001

53.95

22.06

45

 < 0.001

  1. Each SF36 scale is directly transformed into a 0–100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score, the more disability. The higher the score, the less disability (a score of zero is equivalent to a maximum disability, and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability). These scale scores can be combined to produce two component summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Data presented as mean and standard deviation
  2. PF, Physical Functioning; RP, Role Limitations due to Physical Health; BP, Pain; GH, General Health; VT, Vitality; SF, Social Functioning; RE, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems; MH, Mental Health
  3. Per local regulations, no data was collected on leptin replacement status during follow-up. All subjects were leptin naïve at baseline; however, it is likely that a subset of subjects with GL received leptin replacement during follow-up that may have caused elevations in leptin levels at year-2 visit (V9) [31]