Skip to main content

Table 1 Survey respondent demographics

From: Patient pathways for rare diseases in Europe: ataxia as an example

A: UK survey

Respondent type (n = 273)

Patient

234 (85.7%)

 

On behalf of the patient

39 (14.3%)

Age distribution (n = 270)

16–29

12 (4.4%)

 

30–59

106 (39.3%)

 

60–80

140 (51.9%)

 

80 + 

12 (4.4%)

Gender (n = 270)

Female

142 (52.6%)

 

Male

128 (47.4%)

Diagnosis (n = 267)

FRDA

27 (10.1%)

 

Inherited CA

78 (29.2%)

 

Idiopathic CA

114 (42.7%)

 

Other types

38 (14.2%)

 

Not known

10 (3.8%)

Attendance to SAC (n = 248)

Never been

128 (51.6%)

 

Currently going

72 (29%)

 

Used to go

48 (19.4%)

B: Germany survey

Respondent type (n = 101)

Patient

90 (89.1%)

 

On behalf of the patient

11 (10.9%)

Age distribution (n = 101)

16–29

12 (11.9%)

 

30–59

60 (59.4%)

 

60–80

29 (28.7%)

 

80 + 

0 (0%)

Gender (n = 101)

Female

48 (47.5%)

 

Male

53 (52.5%)

Diagnosis (n = 94)

FRDA

14 (14.9%)

 

Inherited CA

52 (55.3%)

 

Idiopathic CA

5 (5.4%)

 

Other types

10 (10.6%)

 

Not known

13 (13.8%)

Attendance to SAC (n = 84)

Never been

23 (23.4%)

 

Currently going

48 (57.1%)

 

Used to go

13 (15.5%)

C: Italy survey

Respondent type (n = 173)

Patient

131 (75.7%)

 

On behalf of the patient

42 (24.3%)

Age distribution (n = 173)

16–29

22 (12.72%)

 

30–59

115 (66.5%)

 

60–80

35 (20.2%)

 

80 + 

1 (0.6%)

Gender (n = 173)

Female

93 (53.8%)

 

Male

80 (46.2%)

Diagnosis (n = 159)

FRDA

56 (35.2%)

 

Inherited CA

42 (26.4%)

 

Idiopathic CA

19 (12%)

 

Other types

27 (17%)

 

Not known

15 (9.4%)

Attendance to SAC (n = 139)

Never been

27 (19.4%)

 

Currently going

82 (59%)

 

Used to go

30 (21.6%)

  1. Table A: CA, cerebellar ataxia; FRDA, Friedreich’s ataxia. After data cleaning, there were 277 respondents to the survey. Other types: episodic ataxia, gluten ataxia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, auto-immune ataxias, sensory ataxia
  2. Table B: CA, cerebellar ataxia; FRDA, Friedreich’s ataxia. After data cleaning, there were 101 respondents to the survey. Other types: episodic ataxia, multiple system atrophy cerebellar type C, ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2, autoimmune response, leukodystrophy, cerebellar ataxia and mitochondriopathy
  3. Table C: CA, cerebellar ataxia; FRDA, Friedreich’s ataxia. After data cleaning, there were 174 respondents to the survey. Other types: cerebrotendineus xanthomatosis, ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1, Gordon Holmes cerebellar ataxia, ataxia due to stiffness, POLR3-related spastic ataxia, Vitamin E deficiency, secondary acquired ataxia, cerebellar ataxia neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome, ataxia post cerebellar cancer, cerebellar ataxia, high probability of post-infectious cause (unknown origin), fragile X associated tremor/ataxia symdrome, spastic ataxia 9, multiple system atrophy, multiple system atrophy cerebellar type C, spastic paraplegia