Skip to main content

Table 4 Results for the main effect (full cohort) and effect modification (interaction) from the zero-inflated Poisson model for any morbidity (yes/no, zero-inflation model) and number of morbidities (count model) for adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) compared to matched adults without SMA (w/o SMA).

From: Prevalence of morbidities across the lifespan for adults with spinal muscular atrophy: a retrospective cohort study

 

Zero-inflated model

Count model

 

OR (95% CI)

IRR (95% CI)

Full cohort*

  

Females

  

SMA vs. w/o SMA

0.26 (0.20, 0.33)

2.11 (2.06, 2.16)

Males

  

SMA vs. w/o SMA

0.16 (0.12, 0.22)

2.15 (2.10, 2.21)

Age interaction

  

Females

  

SMA vs. w/o SMA

 

18–39 years

0.23 (0.16, 0.33)

3.33 (3.07, 3.60)

40–54 years

0.34 (0.23, 0.50)

3.00 (2.82, 3.20)

55–64 years

0.14 (0.06, 0.34)

2.24 (2.10, 2.38)

65–74 years

0.71 (0.46, 1.09)

2.00 (1.91, 2.09)

≥75 years

**

1.75 (1.67, 1.83)

Males

  

SMA vs. w/o SMA

 

18–39 years

0.14 (0.08, 0.22)

2.91 (2.61, 3.24)

40–54 years

0.20 (0.13, 0.30)

2.83 (2.66, 3.02)

55–64 years

0.23 (0.13, 0.41)

2.35 (2.23, 2.49)

65–74 years

0.37 (0.22, 0.61)

2.13 (2.04, 2.22)

≥75 years

**

1.72 (1.63, 1.81)

  1. OR, odds ratio; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval. Age (continuous) was a covariate in the full cohort model. *Estimates are adjusted by age (continuous). **Too few with 0 morbidities to provide reasonable estimates. The zero-inflation model is a logistic regression model, predicting whether the individual had zero vs. non-zero (i.e.¸≥1) morbidities. An OR < 1.00 indicates a lower likelihood of having zero morbidities. The count model is a Poisson regression model, predicting the number of morbidities among those with non-zero values