Skip to main content

Table 1 GRADE strength of recommendations ratings [89]

From: Consensus-based guidelines for the provision of palliative and end-of-life care for people living with epidermolysis bullosa

Strength

Wording

Symbol

Definition

Strong recommendation for the use of an intervention

‘Offer’ (or similar, e.g., ‘use’, ‘provide’, ‘take’, ‘investigate’, etc.)

↑↑

Benefits of the intervention outweigh the risks; most patients would choose the intervention while only a small proportion would not; for clinicians, most of their patients would receive the intervention; for policymakers, it would be a useful performance indicator

Weak recommendation for the use of an intervention

‘Consider’

Risks and benefits of the intervention are finely balanced; many patients would choose the intervention, but many would not; clinicians would need to consider the pros and cons for the patient in the context of the evidence; for policymakers it would be a poor performance indicator where variability in practice is expected

No recommendation

 

Θ

Insufficient evidence to support any recommendation

Strong recommendation against the use of an intervention

‘Do not offer’

↓↓

Risks of the intervention outweigh the benefits; most patients would not choose the intervention while only a small proportion would; for clinicians, most of their patients would not receive the intervention

  1. Good Practice Points (GPP)
  2. GPP—recommended best practice on the clinical experience of the guideline development group
  3. (Ratings table taken from Greenblatt et al. [89] “Recommendations on pregnancy, childbirth and aftercare in epidermolysis bullosa: a consensus-based guideline”)