Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the multivariable regression analyses of working memory performance with energy-adjusted total choline intake and metabolic controla

From: Total choline intake and working memory performance in adults with phenylketonuria

Model

N

Regression coefficient: choline intake (95% CI)b

p-valuec

Regression coefficient: choline intake X Phe (95% CI)d

p-valuec

Adjusted R2

1

40

0.04 (− 0.05, 0.1)

0.38

 − 0.004 (− 0.02, 0.009)

0.50

0.36

2

30

0.10 (− 0.001, 0.19)

0.05

 − 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.004)

0.16

0.44

3

30

0.11 (0.02, 0.20)

0.02

 − 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.002)

0.10

0.52

  1. aAdjusted for intellectual ability (matrix reasoning) in model 1 (full sample, n = 40) and model 2 (reduced sample, n = 30); adjusted for intellectual ability and IDC from 6 to 11 years in model 3 (exploratory analysis with reduced sample, n = 30). Matrix reasoning (MR), IDC, and energy-adjusted choline intake were centered at sample means (MR = 10, IDC = 353 µmol/L, choline = 366 mg) prior to inclusion in the regression models. Most recent Phe was centered at 360 µmol/L
  2. bRegression coefficient represents the change in working memory performance per 100 mg/day increase in energy-adjusted total choline intake when Phe is optimal (360 µmol/L)
  3. cSignificance indicated at p ≤ 0.05; trends informative for future research indicated at p > 0.05 and ≤ 0.1
  4. dRegression coefficient represents the amount by which the association between energy-adjusted total choline intake and working memory performance changes based on a 50 µmol/L increase in most recent Phe concentration