Skip to main content

Table 2 Original EBS trial data analysis of the composite blister and QoL outcomes with the prioritized, non-prioritized and matched GPC. The blister outcome is treated as a standardized difference of the number of blisters \(\left(\frac{\text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r } \text{o}\text{f } \text{b}\text{l}\text{i}\text{s}\text{t}\text{e}\text{r}\text{s } \text{a}\text{t } \text{b}\text{a}\text{s}\text{e}\text{l}\text{i}\text{n}\text{e}-\text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r } \text{o}\text{f } \text{b}\text{l}\text{i}\text{s}\text{t}\text{e}\text{r}\text{s } \text{a}\text{t } \text{w}\text{e}\text{e}\text{k } 4}{\text{N}\text{u}\text{m}\text{b}\text{e}\text{r } \text{o}\text{f } \text{b}\text{l}\text{i}\text{s}\text{t}\text{e}\text{r}\text{s } \text{a}\text{t } \text{b}\text{a}\text{s}\text{e}\text{l}\text{i}\text{n}\text{e}}\right)\). NTB = Net Treatment Benefit, CI = Confidence Interval

From: Composite endpoints, including patient reported outcomes, in rare diseases

 

# wins

#losses

#ties

NTB (95%CI)

p-value two-sided

 

Prioritized GPC

Blister

130 (66%)

61 (31%)

 

0.35

 

QoL

4 (2%)

0 (0%)

 

0.02

 

Total

134 (68%)

61 (31%)

1 (0.5%)

0.37 (-0.06;0.81)

0.0935

 

Non-prioritized GPC

Blister

130 (66%)

61 (31%)

5 (3%)

0.35

0.1124

QoL

141 (72%)

19 (10%)

36 (18%)

0.62

0.0027

Total

   

0.49 (0.15;0.83)

0.0049

 

Matched GPC

Blister

5 (42%)

5 (42%)

 

0.00

 

QoL

2 (17%)

0 (0%)

 

0.20

 

Total

7 (58%)

5 (42%)

0 (0%)

0.17 (-0.36;0.61)

0.5637