Skip to main content

Table 7 NCV for Atidarsagene versus standard care in Fumagalli et al. [13]

From: A systematic review of clinical effectiveness and safety for historical and current treatment options for metachromatic leukodystrophy in children, including atidarsagene autotemcel

MLD type

Symptom status

Follow-up (years)

Atidarsagene

Standard care

Comparison between OTL and standard care

N

Mean NCV index

N

Mean ncv index

Total NCV score

LI

Pre-symp

2

9

− 7.6

10

− 13.3

Treatment difference 5.8 (95% CI 2.4–9.1

p = 0.004 in favour of Atidarsagene

LI

Pre-symp

3

6

− 8.3

10

− 11.5

Treatment difference 3.2 (95% CI 1.0–5.3)

p = 0.010 in favour of Atidarsagene

  1. Mixed refers to populations with a mixture of pre-symptomatic and symptomatic patients
  2. ANCOVA analysis of covariance model, CI confidence interval, EJ early juvenile ML, LI late infantile, LS least squares, MD mean difference, MLD metachromatic leukodystrophy, mth month, N total number analysed, pre-symp pre-symptomatic