Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic details of included studies

From: Systematic review of health related-quality of life in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta

No

Author

Country

Study design

Study size

OI type

OI diagnosis

Sex

Age (years)

1

Orlando [35]

UK

Cross-sectional study

n = 78

Type 1– 32

Self-reported

F = 74%

43 ± 14.5a

     

Type 3– 10

 

M = 26%

 
     

Type 4– 10

   
     

Unknown– 26

   

2

Murali [36]

USA

Cross-sectional study

n = 320

Type 1– 173

Mixed clinical/ genetic

F = 67%

33.7 (25–47)c

     

Type 3– 49

 

M = 33%

 
     

Type 4– 80

   
     

Type 5– 5

   
     

Unknown– 13

   

3

Gjorup [24]

Denmark

Cross-sectional study

OI: n = 73

T 1– 56

Genetic

F = 55%

OI: 45.9b

     

T 3/4– 17

 

M = 45%

 

4

Yonko [37]

Multi-national

Cross-sectional study

n = 157

Type 1– 57

Self-reported

F = 69%

45.9 (19–81)d

     

Type 3– 39

 

M = 30%,

 
     

Type 4– 33

 

Trans man = 1%

 
     

Unknown/ other- 28 

   

5

Matsushita [29]

Japan

Cross-sectional study

n = 40

Congenita– 13

Clinical

F = 55%

37.5e

     

Tarda – 25

 

M = 45%

 
     

Unknown– 2

   

6

Harsevoort [39]

Netherlands

Cross-sectional study

n = 99

Type 1– 72

N.R

F = 62%

45 (19–80)d

     

Type 3– 13

 

M = 38%

 
     

Type 4– 14

   

7

Khan [34]

USA

Cross-sectional study

n = 30

Type 1– 9

Genetic 53%

F = 80%

39 (19–67)d

     

Type 3– 8

Clinical  47%

M = 20%

 
     

Type 4– 12

   
     

Bruck Syndrome– 1

   

8

Gooijer [32]

Netherlands

Cross-sectional study

n = 322

Type 1– 220

Genetic

F = 59%

35.5 (27)c

     

Type 3– 40

 

M = 41%

 
     

Type 4– 62

   

9

Tosi [39]

USA

Cross-sectional study

n = 198

Adults not reported separately

Self-reported

F = 77%

Adults' age not reported separately

       

M = 23%

 

10

Feehan [26]

Australia

Cross-sectional study

n = 52

Less severe– 19 

N.R

F = 54%

27.5 (23–36)c

     

More severe– 33 

 

M = 46%

 

11

Arponen [25]

Finland

Cross-sectional study

n = 56

Type 1– 22

Self-reported

F = 73%

47 (16–75)d

     

Type 3– 10

 

M = 27%

 
     

Type 4– 7

   
     

Unknown– 17

   

12

Hald [31]

Denmark

Cross-sectional study

n = 84

Type 1– 58

Genetic

F = 55%

45 (18–78)d

     

Type 3– 11

 

M = 45%

 
     

Type 4– 15

   

13

Forestier-Zhang [23]

UK

Cross-sectional study

n = 43

Type 1- 18

N.R

F = 77%

40.4 ± 14.4a

     

Type 3– 5

 

M = 23%

 
     

Type 4– 5

   
     

Unknown– 15

   

14

Balkefors [33]

Sweden

Cross-sectional study

n = 29

Type 1 + 4– 29

N.R

F = 62%

41 (21–71)d

       

M = 38%

 

15

Nicolaou [30]

UK

Cross-sectional study

n = 22

Type 1– 7

N.R

F = 59%

24.7 (18–36)d

     

Type 3– 10

 

M = 41%

 
     

Type 4– 5

   

16

Widmann [28]

USA

Cross-sectional study

n = 30

Congenita– 18

Clinical

F = 70%

33 (20–50)d

     

Tarda– 12

 

M = 30%

 

17

Widmann [27]

USA

Cross-sectional study

n = 15

Congenita– 7

Clinical

F = 40%

33.3 (20–45)d

     

Tarda– 8

 

M = 60%

 
  1. N.R. not reported, OI osteogenesis imperfecta, XLH X-linked hypophosphataemia
  2. aMean (standard deviation)
  3. bMean
  4. cMedian (interquartile range)
  5. dMedian (range)
  6. eMedian