Table 4 A summary of the identified training FAIRification challenges and proposed solutions
Curated training FAIRification challenges | Specific solution |
|---|---|
More information on ERDRI (added value, utility) | “Coffee rounds”” (ERDRI, Orphacodes, EUPID, Practical requirements, Practical implementation, Resource finder, Informed Consent, Disability and QoL)” |
Documentation and specification of CDEs | Documentation of Semantic CDE Model |
More information on CDE model (e.g. what is does, what is the added value, what would be the effort to implement it) | |
More information on ADA-M and machine readable consent | ERN Technical Workshops (Semantic CDE Model, EJP RD Metadata Model, EUPID API, Data formats and mapping languages, Phenopackets, Query builder, Orphacodes, DCDEs, PROMs) |
More information on Beacon 2.0 (added value, utility, how to implement it) | |
More information on EJP-RD Metadata Model (what it does, what is the added value) | |
More information on EUPID (e.g. licenses, costs) | |
More information on FAIR Data Point (how will it work) | |
More information on Phenopackets (utility) | |
More information on Querying | |
More information on RDF Mapping Languages | |
What interoperability impact difference would be between using CDE Model and OMOP-CMD? | |
More information on FAIR | Rome Summer School |
Ground rules for interoperability (e.g., terminology, personnel, connectivity mechanism, API definition sets, diagrams, and technology specification) | Virtual Platform Specification (VIPS) |
More information on EJP RD Virtual Platform |