Skip to main content

Table 2 Stakeholder ratings of the final core set of relevant PROs across the two Delphi surveys

From: Key patient-reported outcomes in children and adolescents with intoxication-type inborn errors of metabolism: an international Delphi-based consensus

 

HP (median/IQR)

Patients and parents (median/IQR)

Total sample (n = 30)

Total sample (n = 33)

Non-acute sample (n = 13)

Acute sample (n = 20)

S1

S2

S1

S2

S1

S2

S1

S2

Patients’ HrQoL

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (2.5)

9 (0.5)

Positive affect

7 (2)

7 (2)

8 (4)

7.5 (2)

8 (2.75)

8.5 (2)

8 (4)

8 (2.5)

Stress

7 (2)

8 (1)

8 (2.75)

8 (1)

8 (2.75)

8 (2)

8 (2)

8 (2)

Physical activity

7 (2.75)

7 (1.75)

8 (2)

8 (1.75)

8 (1.75)

8 (2)

8 (2)

8 (1.5)

Peer relationships

8 (1)

8 (1.5)

8 (2)

8 (1.5)

7 (1)

9 (1.75)

9 (1)

8 (1.5)

Social participation

a

8 (1)

a

8 (1)

a

9 (0.75)

a

8 (3)

Cognitive functioning (behavioural)

8 (2)

8 (2)

8 (2)

8.5 (2)

8.5 (2)

9 (1)

8 (2)

9 (1)

Self-efficacy (towards the disease)

8 (1)

8 (1)

9 (2)

8 (1)

9 (2.75)

8 (1.75)

8.5 (1.75)

9 (1)

Patients' disease- and treatment knowledge

8 (2)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (2)

9 (1.75)

9 (0)

Patients’ attitude towards disease and treatment

8 (2)

9 (1)

8.5 (2)

9 (1)

8 (1)

9 (2)

9 (2.75)

9 (1)

Treatment- and diet adversities for patients

8 (2)

8 (1)

9 (1)

8 (2)

9 (1)

9 (3.75)

8.5 (2.75)

9 (1)

Patients' compliance with diet and treatment

8 (2)

9 (1)

8.5 (2)

9 (1)

8.5 (1.75)

8 (2)

8.5 (2)

9 (1)

Parental HrQoL

7 (3)

8 (2)

8.5 (3)

8 (2)

7 (3.75)

9 (1)

9 (1.75)

7 (3.5)

Social support of the family

8 (2.75)

8 (1)

7 (4)

8 (1)

6 (2)

8 (2)

8 (3.5)

7 (2.5)

Parental disease- and treatment knowledge

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

9 (1)

8.5 (1.75)

9 (0)

9 (0.75)

9 (1)

Parental attitude towards disease and treatment

9 (1)

9 (0)

9 (1)

9 (0)

9 (2)

6.5 (0.75)

9 (1)

7 (0)

Parental stress

8 (2)

8 (2)

7.5 (3.75)

8 (2)

6.5 (2.75)

8 (2.75)

8 (7)

8 (2)

  1. Median and IQR for stakeholder ratings (9-point Likert scale; 1 = not at all important, 9 = very important) in the two consecutive survey rounds
  2. HP health care providers, IQR interquartile range, n sample size, S1 survey one, S2 survey two, HrQoL health related quality of life
  3. aPRO suggested by a participant during survey one