Table 2 Share of positive recommendations and reimbursement decisions in analysed countries with respect to the type of approval
Country | Approval type | Recommendation | Reimbursement | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | No recommendation | Reimbursed | Not reimbursed | |||
Bulgaria | Conditional approval | 2 (22.22%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (77.78%) | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 10 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) | 15 (60%) | 25 | |
Total | 13 (36.11%) | 0 (0%) | 23 (63.89%) | 13 (36.11%) | 23 (63.89%) | 36 | |
Croatia | Conditional approval | 1 (11.11%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (88.89%) | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 9 (36%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (64%) | 6 (24%) | 19 (76%) | 25 | |
Total | 10 (27.78%) | 0 (0%) | 26 (72.22%) | 8 (22.22%) | 28 (77.78%) | 36 | |
Czechia | Conditional approval | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 10 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) | 15 (60%) | 25 | |
Total | 11 (30.56%) | 0 (0%) | 25 (69.44%) | 10 (27.78%) | 26 (72.22%) | 36 | |
Estonia | Conditional approval | 2 (22.22%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (77.78%) | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 11 (44%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (56%) | 11 (44%) | 14 (56%) | 25 | |
Total | 13 (36.11%) | 0 (0%) | 23 (63.89%) | 13 (36.11%) | 23 (63.89%) | 36 | |
Hungary | Conditional approval | 2 (22.22%) | 1 (11.11%) | 6 (66.67%) | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 9 (36%) | 4 (16%) | 12 (48%) | 9 (36%) | 16 (64%) | 25 | |
Total | 12 (33.33%) | 5 (13.89%) | 19 (52.78%) | 12 (33.33%) | 24 (66.67%) | 36 | |
Latvia | Conditional approval | 1 (11.11%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (88.89%) | 1 (11.11%) | 8 (88.89%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 3 (12%) | 3 (12%) | 19 (76%) | 3 (12%) | 22 (88%) | 25 | |
Total | 4 (11.11%) | 4 (11.11%) | 28 (77.78%) | 4 (11.11%) | 32 (88.89%) | 36 | |
Lithuania | Conditional approval | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 10 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) | 15 (60%) | 25 | |
Total | 10 (27.78%) | 0 (0%) | 26 (72.22%) | 10 (27.78%) | 26 (72.22%) | 36 | |
Poland | Conditional approval | 2 (22.22%) | 3 (33.33%) | 4 (44.44%) | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 8 (32%) | 9 (36%) | 8 (32%) | 12 (48%) | 13 (52%) | 25 | |
Total | 11 (30.56%) | 12 (33.33%) | 13 (36.11%) | 15 (41.67%) | 21 (58.33%) | 36 | |
Romania | Conditional approval | 1 (11.11%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (88.89%) | 1 (11.11%) | 8 (88.89%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 6 (24%) | 0 (0%) | 19 (76%) | 7 (28%) | 18 (72%) | 25 | |
Total | 8 (22.22%) | 0 (0%) | 28 (77.78%) | 9 (25%) | 27 (75%) | 36 | |
Slovakia | Conditional approval | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.11%) | 8 (88.89%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 9 |
Exceptional circumstances | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 | |
Unconditional | 10 (40%) | 2 (8%) | 13 (52%) | 10 (40%) | 15 (60%) | 25 | |
Total | 10 (27.78%) | 3 (8.33%) | 23 (63.89%) | 10 (27.78%) | 26 (72.22%) | 36 | |