Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of positive recommendations for all new submissions of DRDs

From: Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada

 

All new submissions

Non-Cancer drugs

Cancer drugs

Factors

n

Positive recommendations

% Positive

p-value*

n

Positive recommendations

% Positive

p-value*

n

Positive recommendations

% Positive

p-value*

All

92

71

77.2

 

35

27

77.1

 

57

44

77.2

 

Type of condition

   

0.996

        

 Cancer

57

44

77.2

         

 Non-cancer

35

27

77.1

         

Submission characteristics

Presence of RCTs

   

0.083

   

0.033

   

0.727

 No

22

14

63.6

 

7

3

42.9

 

15

11

73.3

 

 Yes

70

57

81.4

 

28

24

85.7

 

42

33

78.6

 

Therapeutic class of drug

   

0.714

   

0.418

 

NA

  

 Alimentary tract & metabolism

10

9

90.0

 

10

9

90.0

     

 Antineoplastic & immunomodulating

68

51

75.0

 

11

7

63.6

     

 Others

14

11

78.6

 

14

11

78.6

     

Characteristics of disease

Prevalence

   

1.000

   

1.000

   

1.000

 Ultra- orphan

14

11

78.6

 

8

6

75.0

 

6

5

83.3

 

 Orphan

78

60

96.9

 

27

21

77.8

 

51

39

76.5

 

Clinical need

   

0.051

   

0.419

   

0.070

 No/ not stated

28

18

64.3

 

20

14

70.0

 

8

4

50.0

 

 Yes

64

53

82.8

 

15

13

86.7

 

49

40

81.6

 

Clinical safety/ efficacy

Safety issues

   

0.021

   

0.226

   

0.102

 Yes

33

21

63.6

 

11

7

63.6

 

22

14

63.6

 

 No

59

50

84.7

 

24

20

83.3

 

35

30

85.7

 

Improvements in biomarker/surrogate outcomes

   

0.316

   

0.228

   

0.006

 No/ inconsistent/ not measured

27

19

70.4

 

17

15

88.2

 

10

4

40.0

 

 Yes

65

52

80.0

 

18

12

66.7

 

47

40

85.1

 

Improvements in clinical outcomes

   

0.005

   

0.073

   

0.084

 No/ inconsistent/ not measured

66

46

69.7

 

25

17

68.0

 

41

29

70.7

 

 Yes

26

25

96.1

 

10

10

100.0

 

16

15

93.7

 

Improvements in PRO

   

0.010

   

0.299

   

0.042

 No/ inconsistent/ not measured

67

47

70.1

 

29

21

72.4

 

38

26

68.4

 

 Yes

25

24

96.0

 

6

6

100.0

 

19

18

94.7

 

Quality of evidence

Availability of comparative data

   

0.427

   

1.000

   

0.510

 No

33

27

81.8

 

14

11

78.6

 

19

16

84.2

 

 Yes

59

44

74.6

 

21

16

76.2

 

38

28

73.7

 

Consistency between population in trials and indications

   

0.130

   

0.431

   

0.345

 No

48

34

70.8

 

21

15

71.4

 

27

19

70.4

 

 Yes

44

37

84.1

 

14

12

85.7

 

30

25

83.3

 

Bias in outcome measures

   

0.503

   

0.216

   

1.000

 Yes

54

43

79.6

 

12

11

91.7

 

42

32

76.2

 

 No

38

28

73.7

 

23

16

69.6

 

15

12

80.0

 

Long term data

   

0.186

   

0.390

   

0.346

 No

62

45

72.6

 

25

18

72.0

 

37

27

73.0

 

 Yes

30

26

86.7

 

10

9

90.0

 

20

17

85.0

 

Other study design issues

   

0.202

   

1.000

   

0.044

 Yes

58

42

72.4

 

19

15

78.9

 

39

27

69.2

 

 No

34

29

85.3

 

16

12

75.0

 

18

17

94.4

 

Cost/ cost-effectiveness

Daily treatment cost

   

1.000

   

0.298

   

0.258

  ≤ 150

19

15

78.9

 

13

12

92.3

 

6

3

50.0

 

 150–500

52

40

76.9

 

8

5

62.5

 

44

35

79.6

 

  > 500

21

16

76.2

 

14

10

71.4

 

7

6

85.7

 

ICER in $CDN/QALYs a

   

0.647

   

1.000

   

0.194

  ≤ 100,000

12

11

91.7

 

2

2

100.0

 

10

9

90.0

 

 100,000-500,000

48

37

77.1

 

7

6

85.7

 

41

31

75.6

 

  > 500,000

16

13

81.2

 

12

11

91.7

 

4

2

50.0

 
  1. DRDs Drugs for rare diseases, ICER Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NA Not applicable, PRO Patient-reported outcomes, RCT Randomized controlled trial
  2. *p-values based on Pearson’s chi-square statistic or Fisher’s exact test
  3. aData on ICER was only available for 76 recommendations