Table 3 Comparison among different items from the criteria proposed by Monteiro et al. [22] in Group II
Items of criteria according to Table 1 | Positive criteria | Total of Individuals | Negative for 22q11.2DS | Positive for 22q11.2DS | p value | ORa | IC95%b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Yes | 09 | 04 (3.47%) | 05 (9.43%) | 0.0949 | 3.177 | 0.818–12.336 |
No | 170 | 122 (96.83%) | 48 (90.57%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
B# | Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – |
No | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
C | Yes | 22 | 15 (11.90%) | 07 (13.21%) | 0.9086 | 1.126 | 0.431–2.943 |
No | 157 | 111 (88.1%) | 46 (86.79%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
D | Yes | 101 | 65 (51.59%) | 36 (67.92%) | 0.0459 | 1.987 | 1.013–3.901 |
No | 78 | 61 (48.41%) | 17 (32.08%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
E | Yes | 11 | 08 (6.35%) | 03 (5.66%) | 0.8610 | 0.885 | 0.225–3.474 |
No | 168 | 118 (93.65%) | 50 (94.34%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
F | Yes | 22 | 13 (10.32%) | 09 (16.98%) | 0.2193 | 1.778 | 0.710–4.455 |
No | 157 | 113 (89.68%) | 44 (83.02%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
G## | Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – |
No | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
H | Yes | 76 | 48 (38.10%) | 28 (52.83%) | 0.0702 | 1.820 | 0.952–3.480 |
No | 103 | 78 (61.90%) | 25 (47.17%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
I | Yes | 03 | 02 (1.59%) | 01 (1.89%) | 0.8868 | 1.192 | 0.106–13.438 |
No | 176 | 124 (98.41%) | 52 (98.11%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
J | Yes | 94 | 61 (48.41%) | 33 (62.26%) | 0.0919 | 1.758 | 0.912–3.388 |
No | 85 | 65 (51.59%) | 20 (37.74%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
K | Yes | 66 | 34 (26.98%) | 32 (60.38%) | <.0001 | 4.123 | 2.096–8.111 |
No | 113 | 92 (73.02%) | 21 (39.62%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
L | Yes | 66 | 44 (34.92%) | 22 (41.51%) | 0.4048 | 1.323 | 0.685–2.553 |
No | 113 | 82 (65.08%) | 31 (58.49%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
M | Yes | 08 | 07 (5.56%) | 01 (1.89%) | 0.3015 | 0.327 | 0.028–2.725 |
No | 171 | 119 (94.44%) | 52 (98.11%) | – | 1.000 | – | |
N | Yes | 11 | 10 (7.94%) | 1 (1.89%) | 0.1578 | 0.223 | 0.028–1.788 |
No | 168 | 116 (92.06%) | 52 (98.11%) | – | 1.000 | – |