© Sarkozy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 06 January 2008
Accepted: 27 May 2008
Published: 27 May 2008
LEOPARD syndrome (LS, OMIM 151100) is a rare multiple congenital anomalies condition, mainly characterized by skin, facial and cardiac anomalies. LEOPARD is an acronym for the major features of this disorder, including multiple L entigines, E CG conduction abnormalities, O cular hypertelorism, P ulmonic stenosis, A bnormal genitalia, R etardation of growth, and sensorineural D eafness. About 200 patients have been reported worldwide but the real incidence of LS has not been assessed. Facial dysmorphism includes ocular hypertelorism, palpebral ptosis and low-set ears. Stature is usually below the 25th centile. Cardiac defects, in particular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mostly involving the left ventricle, and ECG anomalies are common. The lentigines may be congenital, although more frequently manifest by the age of 4–5 years and increase throughout puberty. Additional common features are café-au-lait spots (CLS), chest anomalies, cryptorchidism, delayed puberty, hypotonia, mild developmental delay, sensorineural deafness and learning difficulties. In about 85% of the cases, a heterozygous missense mutation is detected in exons 7, 12 or 13 of the PTPN11 gene. Recently, missense mutations in the RAF1 gene have been found in two out of six PTPN11-negative LS patients. Mutation analysis can be carried out on blood, chorionic villi and amniotic fluid samples. LS is largely overlapping Noonan syndrome and, during childhood, Neurofibromatosis type 1-Noonan syndrome. Diagnostic clues of LS are multiple lentigines and CLS, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and deafness. Mutation-based differential diagnosis in patients with borderline clinical manifestations is warranted. LS is an autosomal dominant condition, with full penetrance and variable expressivity. If one parent is affected, a 50% recurrence risk is appropriate. LS should be suspected in foetuses with severe cardiac hypertrophy and prenatal DNA test may be performed. Clinical management should address growth and motor development and congenital anomalies, in particular cardiac defects that should be monitored annually. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy needs careful risk assessment and prophylaxis against sudden death in patients at risk. Hearing should be evaluated annually until adulthood. With the only exception of ventricular hypertrophy, adults with LS do not require special medical care and long-term prognosis is favourable.
Disease name and synonyms
Leopard syndrome (LS, OMIM 151100) is named based on an acronym, mnemonic for the major features of this disorder: multiple L entigines, E CG conduction abnormalities, O cular hypertelorism, P ulmonic stenosis, A bnormal genitalia, R etardation of growth, and sensorineural D eafness [1, 2]. This disease was also known as Multiple Lentigines syndrome, Cardio-cutaneous syndrome, Moynahan syndrome, Lentiginosis profusa and Progressive Cardiomyopathic Lentiginosis.
LS was first reported by Zeisler and Becker in 1936, in a 24-year-old woman presenting with multiple lentigines, increasing in number from birth to puberty, pectus carinatum, hypertelorism and prognathism . A few decades later, Gorlin et al. reviewed this disorder and coined the LEOPARD acronym supporting the concept of a more generalised condition .
LS is a rare condition, but the exact birth prevalence is unknown. Not less than 200 patients have been reported and two reviews published [1, 4]. Within the group of the so called 'neuro-cardio-facial-cutaneous' (NCFC) syndromes, LS is probably the second most common disorder after Noonan syndrome (NS) . However, LS is likely underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as many of its features are mild and the correct diagnosis might be missed in the absence of lentiginosis.
LS is characterised by the presence of multiple lentigines, although these patients are showing a wide spectrum of features with marked variation in expression [1, 2, 4, 6]. As mnemonically suggested by the acronym, the main features include multiple lentigines, facial dysmorphisms, cardiac anomalies, electrocardiographic (ECG) conduction abnormalities, retardation of growth, abnormal genitalia and sensorineural deafness.
Electrocardiographic anomalies and progressive conduction anomalies are the most common heart defects [4, 6–8]. A superiorly oriented mean QRS axis in the frontal plane is frequently observed, even in the absence of structural cardiac abnormalities, and does represent a useful diagnostic handle. A cardiological review indicated that ECG abnormalities occur in about 75% of the patients, including left or biventricular hypertrophy in 46% of them, often in association with q waves (19%), prolonged QTc (23%) and repolarisation abnormalities (42%) . Conduction defects are found in 23% of the patients and p wave abnormalities in 19%. On the whole, about 70% of LS individuals display cardiac defects [; personal observation]. Previous reports suggested that pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS), with or without dysplasia, is the most common defect (40%) [4, 6]. However, current data points to a consistently lower figure for this defect (10–20%) [8, 9]. Conversely, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most frequent anomaly and represents the only life-threatening problem in these patients. HCM, which in general is asymmetric and involves the left ventricle, is detected in up to 80% of the subjects with cardiac defect, and may associate with significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in up to 40% of the cases [[8–10]; personal data]. Fatal events and sudden death have been reported in LS patients with HCM [7, 8, 11, 12]. HCM can be congenital, but frequently manifests during the second infancy [7, 8, 12]. The onset of HCM usually precedes multiple lentigines, but the hypertrophic process may start or often worsen in parallel with lentigines appearance. Mitral valve prolapse, clefting or other morphological abnormalities have been found in up to 42% of cases . Less frequent heart defects are atrial and atrioventricular septal defects, coronary artery abnormalities, apical aneurysm and non compaction of the left ventricle, multiple ventricular septal defects, isolated left ventricular enlargement and endocardial fibroelastosis [[6, 8]; personal observation].
Weight and length
Birth weight is normal or above the average in one third of the newborns . Subsequently, LS patients show retardation of growth, with 25% of cases below the 3rd centile in height and 85% of adults below the 25th centile [[4, 14]; personal observation].
Thorax anomalies, including broad chest, pectus carinatum or excavatum are found in up to 75% of the newborns . Mandibular prognathism, winging of the scapulae, scoliosis, joint hyperflexibility and other findings are less common .
Genital and urinary tract anomalies
Bilateral cryptorchidism occurs in about 50% of males, but hypospadia and genital hypoplasia are also frequent. Delayed puberty and hypoplastic ovary have been reported in females. More cases are transmitted through affected mothers suggesting a reduced male fertility. Renal anomalies, including horseshoe kidney, are rare [4, 10].
Hypotonia is common in the newborn and can result in delayed psychomotor development . Mild learning difficulties are reported in about 30% of the cases, while mental retardation is rare [[4, 10]; personal observation].
Haematological complications, such as myelodysplasia, acute myelogenous leukaemia and neuroblastoma, have been described in a few patients [4, 15, 16]. Malignant melanoma was diagnosed in a patient with a germline PTPN11 and a somatic BRAF mutation . Bilateral choristomas have been reported in a 5-year-old girl .
LS may be sporadic or inherited as an autosomal dominant fully penetrant trait. In approximately 85% of the patients with a definite diagnosis of LS, a missense mutation is found in the PTPN11 gene, located on chromosome 12q24.1 [9, 19]. The PTPN11 gene encodes for the SRC homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing PTPase (SHP2) protein, characterised by two tandemly arranged SH2 (N-SH2 and C-SH2) domains and one protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) domain. SHP2 functions as a cytoplasmic signalling transducer downstream of multiple receptors for growth factors, cytokines and hormones, with a particular role through the RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [20, 21]. To the best of our knowledge, 11 different missense PTPN11 mutations, in exon 7, 12 and 13 (Tyr279Cys/Ser, Ala461Thr, Gly464Ala, Thr468Met/Pro, Arg498Trp/Leu, Gln506Pro, and Gln510Glu/Gly), have been reported so far, two of which (Tyr279Cys and Thr468Met) occur in about 65% of the cases [[9, 10, 22–29], personal data]. Germinal mutations in the PTPN11 gene are also responsible for about 40–50% of Noonan (NS) and Noonan-like/Multiple Giant Cell lesions syndrome cases [30, 31]. Known changes appear to be exclusive for NS or LS, leading to specific genotype-phenotype correlations between these two disorders [23, 31]. Among patients with PTPN11 mutations, an association between exon 7 and 12 mutations and HCM, and between exon 8 mutations and PVS, has been established . LS patients without PTPN11 mutations show a higher prevalence of ECG abnormalities and left ventricle hypertrophy . Analyses of the natural history of HCM in LS patients with different genotypes indicate that patients without PTPN11 mutations show a higher frequency of family history of sudden death, increased left atrial dimensions, bradyarrhythmias and other adverse arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic events . Mutations affecting exon 13 in the PTPN11 gene are often associated with an important cardiac phenotype, characterised by rapidly progressive severe biventricular obstructive HCM, often with prenatal onset, and with serious cardiac complications during follow-up (heart failure, septal myectomy, and sudden death) [12, 28, 32]. Analysis of personal cohorts of LS patients indicate that mutation of the Thr468 residue is less frequently associated with short stature, compared to mutation of the Tyr279 residue (26% vs. 47%), in which also deafness is more common (24% vs. 9%) [personal data]. This data confirm a previous observation of less adverse effects of the Thr468Met mutation on body growth and cardiac development, with lower prevalence of PVS in these patients .
Although LS and NS are clinically overlapping conditions, nosological splitting is well supported by distinct functional effects of the disease causing mutation: gain of function in NS and reduced protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in LS, suggestive of a dominant-negative effect [34, 35].
Genetic heterogeneity was supported by linkage analysis , and recently confirmed by the identification of RAF1 gene mutations in two out of six PTPN11 mutation negative LS patients . RAF1 protein is one of the three mammalian RAF isoforms (ARAF, BRAF and CRAF or RAF1), threonine-serine protein kinases with nonredundant developmental functions, acting downstream of RAS . RAF1 gene mutations are also responsible for a subset of NS, 75% of which develop HCM [37, 39]. The two LS subjects carrying the Leu613Val and Ser257Leu changes disclosed a full blown LS phenotype, with multiple lentigines, CLS, HCM and delayed puberty . Pandit et al. investigated the functional effect of different RAF1 mutants, including the Leu613Val change, and showed that those associated with HCM had increased kinase activity and enhanced ERK activation . These data reinforce the role of increased RAS signalling in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy pathogenesis and suggest that LS pathogenesis should not be simply related to a reduced RAS signal transduction [37, 40].
About 5% of LS patients of the reported series do not have PTPN11 or RAF1 mutations. Analysis of additional genes encoding for member or the RAS pathway will likely expand the LS genetic heterogeneity.
Distinct missense PTPN11 gene mutations occur as somatic events in myeloid or lymphoid malignancies [; Cosmic database]. Both the spectrum and the distribution of these PTPN11 mutations are different from those documented in LS and related disorders.
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis
LS is a rare autosomal dominant disease, with high penetrance and marked variable expression, mainly characterised by short stature, facial dysmorphisms, cardiac anomalies and hyperpigmented skin lesions, specifically multiple lentigines and CLS [1, 2, 6]. According to Voron et al., clinical diagnosis of LS may be suspected in the presence of multiple lentigines and two cardinal features . In the absence of lentiginosis, three features in the patient and the presence of an affected close relative are diagnostic. Since some features manifest with advancing age, the diagnosis may be problematic in very young patients with only partial phenotypes. However, molecular testing is supportive in this difficult task . Digilio et al. suggested that diagnosis of LS in the first months of age can be clinically suspected in the presence of three main features, including HCM, distinct facial dysmorphisms and CLS .
LS is one of the so called 'neuro-cardio-facial-cutaneous'(NCFC) syndromes , which include some overlapping disorders, such as NS, Neurofibromatosis type 1, Costello syndrome, Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome and LS itself, all caused by mutations in some components of the Ras signalling pathway. These subjects display facial anomalies, heart defects and growth retardation, often associated with skin, skeletal and genital anomalies, and variable degree of mental retardation. In addition, each of these conditions present a few distinct features that are useful handles for differential diagnosis.
Except for its most striking feature, i.e. the multiple lentigines, LS largely overlaps with NS [41, 42]. While NS patients show more conspicuous facial features in infancy and childhood, PVS (single-ventricle physiology) is the most frequent cardiac defect in this condition, and skin anomalies and deafness have been rarely reported. Conversely, diagnostic clues of LS are the cutaneous manifestations, such as CLS and multiple lentigines, HCM and deafness. The phenotypic overlap between NS and LS may complicate the differential diagnosis in young individuals who have not yet developed lentigines. Molecular diagnosis and long term follow-up are critical in these individuals. In fact, re-examination later in life may reveal the presence of CLS or lentigines, as for a patient with the Tyr279Cys mutation reported by Tartaglia et al. [31, 43]. Likewise, detection of a LS-related mutation should shift the diagnosis toward this condition, as suggested by Digilio et al. for the patient reported by Takahashi and colleagues [8, 28, 32].
LS also displays an important phenotypic overlap with Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS), a clinical entity manifesting with the association of facial and cardiac characteristics of NS with clinical features of neurofibromatosis 1, including CLS, neurofibromas, central nervous system and skeletal anomalies [44, 45]. NFNS is largely caused by NF1 gene mutations . Nevertheless, NFNS may have different potential aetiologies and NFNS phenotype has been described also in patients with mutations in both the NF1 and PTPN11 genes  as well as in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) patients with Noonan-like features [48, 49]. In addition, patients with NS-related gene mutations can have pigmentary skin manifestations similar to those present in neurofibromatosis 1. Mutation-based differential diagnosis in patients with borderline clinical manifestations is warranted .
LS is caused by heterozygous missense mutations in autosomal genes. Familial cases are commonly reported, and prevalence of transmitting mothers might be related to reduced male fertility. Genetic counselling should include:
• revision of a three generation family tree, with specific enquiries for skin and cardiac anomalies, short stature and learning difficulties;
• revision of pregnancy and developmental history and schooling;
• examination of growth parameters, facial dysmorphisms, skin, skeleton, joints, heart and external genitalia;
• complete clinical and cardiological examination of parents, inclusive of echocardiogram and ECG, if possible;
• revision of natural history of the condition, its manifestation and clinical variability, occurrence and recurrence risks, and the eventual recommendation for clinical and molecular investigations to confirm the diagnosis;
• management and follow-up, inclusive of available treatments and interventions.
If one of the parents is affected, a 50% recurrence risk is appropriate. Germinal mutations and autosomal recessive inheritance have not been reported so far. Accordingly, in case of identified de novo mutation in sporadic patients, the recurrence risk for siblings is marginal. Molecular investigation should take into account the PTPN11 gene screening first, and then the RAF1 gene screening in PTPN11-negative individuals.
The prenatal differential diagnosis between NS and LS may be extremely difficult. LS should be suspected in foetuses with a normal karyotype and HCM. If LS is suspected, physical examination of the parents is indicated. If one parent is affected, obstetric ultrasound at different timings and foetal echocardiography at 20 weeks' of gestations is indicated. A DNA test for mutation analysis can be carried out on chorionic villi or amniotic fluid samples.
Management, treatment and prognosis
Clinical management, follow-up and treatment of LS patients greatly overlaps that of NS [41, 42]. However, a few issues need to be addressed differently, taking into account the specific clinical problems and needs of LS individuals. Baseline studies at diagnosis should include a complete clinical examination, cardiological, genitourinary and neurological evaluations and hearing assessment. Laboratory studies should include molecular analysis of the PTPN11 and RAF1 genes.
In general, long-term prognosis of LS patients is favourable. In case of cardiac anomalies at diagnosis, a periodic assessment should be performed as recommended by the cardiologist. Otherwise, a complete cardiological assessment should be performed annually and particularly at the appearance of multiple lentigines. Mild PVS has a good prognosis, while severe valvular dysplasia of the pulmonary valve may recommend valvulotomy or valvulectomy . As suggested by Limongelli et al., pathologic and clinical findings may be similar in familial HCM and left ventricular hypertrophy associated to LS . Accordingly, LS patients with ventricular hypertrophy may follow familial HCM algorithms . A beta-blockade or calcium channel blockers therapy could be indicated in the case of a significant gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta. In the absence of any improvement, surgical removal of the left ventricular outflow obstruction is indicated. Fatal events occurring in patients with HCM recommend careful risk assessment and prophylaxis against sudden death in patients at risk [8, 12, 13]. Isolated conduction defects should be monitored annually and treated as in the general population. Annual hearing assessment should be performed until adulthood and hearing aids indicated, if needed. During follow-up, growth parameters should be monitored as in NS [41, 42]. If growth hormone (GH) therapy is started, the cardiac status should be ongoing assessed, in particular in the presence of HCM. In the case of multiple lentigines or CLS, total UVA-UVB protection should be indicated. Genitourinary, musculoskeletal, neurological and orthodontic anomalies should be monitored and treated as for NS [41, 42]. In the presence of developmental delay or difficulties at school, an infant stimulation program and alternate teaching method should be initiated. Hypotonia usually is benefiting of physical and occupational therapies. On the whole, most adults with LS do not require special medical care. Males with cryptorchidism in childhood may have fertility problems in adulthood.
The LS phenotype is extremely heterogeneous, ranging from adults with mild facial features and multiple lentigines, to patients with severe HCM, mental retardation, deafness and additional defects. Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis and functional studies are providing answers to these questions. In early childhood and before the appearance of lentigines, diagnosis of LS is sometimes difficult because of the overlap with NS and NFNS. In these patients, a mutation-based diagnosis is recommended.
Presence of patients without PTPN11 and RAF1 mutations further expand genetic heterogeneity of LS and points towards other genes likely involved in the same RAS-MAPK pathway.
Written consent was obtained from the patients or by the patient's relative for pubblication. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Authors of this manuscript.
pulmonary valve stenosis
Neurofibromatosis- Noonan syndrome
Written consent for publication was obtained from the patient or their relative. The authors apologise to colleagues whose work was not cited due to limited space. Research in the authors' laboratory is supported in part by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2007 to AS; Ricerca Corrente 2008 to BD; Progetto Programma Italia-Usa "Malattie Rare" to AS) and the Italian Ministry of University and Research (Progetto Ateneo 2007 to BD).
- Gorlin RJ, Anderson RC, Blaw M: Multiple lentigines syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1969, 17: 652-62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gorlin RJ, Anderson RC, Moller JH: The Leopard (multiple lentigines) syndrome revisited. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1971, 7 (4): 110-5.Google Scholar
- Zeisler EP, W S: Generalized Lentigo. Arch Dermat Syph. 1936, 33: 109-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voron DA, Hatfield HH, Kalkhoff RK: Multiple lentigines syndrome. Case report and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1976, 60: 447-56. 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90764-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bentires-Alj M, Kontaridis MI, Neel BG: Stops along the RAS pathway in human genetic disease. Nat Med. 2006, 12: 283-5. 10.1038/nm0306-283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coppin BD, Temple IK: Multiple lentigines syndrome (LEOPARD syndrome or progressive cardiomyopathic lentiginosis). J Med Genet. 1997, 34: 582-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somerville J, Bonham-Carter RE: The heart in lentiginosis. Br Heart J. 1972, 34: 58-66. 10.1136/hrt.34.1.58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limongelli G, Pacileo G, Marino B, Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, Elliott P, Versacci P, Calabro P, De Zorzi A, Di Salvo G, Syrris P, Patton M, McKenna WJ, Dallapiccola B, Calabro R: Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with the LEOPARD syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2007, 100: 736-41. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkozy A, Conti E, Digilio MC, Marino B, Morini E, Pacileo G, Wilson M, Calabro R, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: Clinical and molecular analysis of 30 patients with multiple lentigines LEOPARD syndrome. J Med Genet. 2004, 41: e68-10.1136/jmg.2003.013466.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, de Zorzi A, Pacileo G, Limongelli G, Mingarelli R, Calabro R, Marino B, Dallapiccola B: LEOPARD syndrome: clinical diagnosis in the first year of life. Am J Med Genet A. 2006, 140: 740-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woywodt A, Welzel J, Haase H, Duerholz A, Wiegand U, Potratz J, Sheikhzadeh A: Cardiomyopathic lentiginosis/LEOPARD syndrome presenting as sudden cardiac arrest. Chest. 1998, 113: 1415-7. 10.1378/chest.113.5.1415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limongelli G, Sarkozy A, Pacileo G, Calabrò P, Digilio MC, Maddaloni V, Gagliardi G, Di Salvo G, Iacomino M, Marino B, Dallapiccola B, Calabrò R: Genotype-phenotype analysis and natural history of left ventricular hypertrophy in LEOPARD syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2008, 46 (): 620-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selmanowitz VJ, Orentreich N, Felsenstein JM: Lentiginosis profusa syndrome (multiple lentigines syndrome). Arch Dermatol. 1971, 104: 393-401. 10.1001/archderm.104.4.393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorlin JR, Cohen MM, Levn LS: Leopard syndrome. Syndromes of the head and neck. Edited by: Gorlin JR, Cohen MM, Levn LS. 1990, New York, Oxford University Press, 461-4.Google Scholar
- Ucar C, Calyskan U, Martini S, Heinritz W: Acute myelomonocytic leukemia in a boy with LEOPARD syndrome (PTPN11 gene mutation positive. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007, 28: 123-5.Google Scholar
- Merks JH, Caron HN, Hennekam RC: High incidence of malformation syndromes in a series of 1,073 children with cancer. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 134 (2): 132-43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seishima M, Mizutani Y, Shibuya Y, Arakawa C, Yoshida R, Ogata T: Malignant melanoma in a woman with leopard syndrome: Identification of a germline PTPN11 mutation and a somatic BRAF mutation. Br J Dermatol. 2007, 157: 1297-9. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08229.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi WW, Yoo JY, Park KC, Kim KH: Leopard syndrome with a new association of congenital corneal tumor, choristoma. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003, 20: 158-60. 10.1046/j.1525-1470.2003.20214.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Digilio MC, Conti E, Sarkozy A, Mingarelli R, Dottorini T, Marino B, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: Grouping of multiple-lentigines/LEOPARD and Noonan syndromes on the PTPN11 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 71: 389-94. 10.1086/341528.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neel BG, Gu H, Pao L: The 'Shp'ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003, 28: 284-93. 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Shannon KM, Loh ML: SHP-2 and myeloid malignancies. Curr Opin Hematol. 2004, 11: 44-50. 10.1097/00062752-200401000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Legius E, Schrander-Stumpel C, Schollen E, Pulles-Heintzberger C, Gewillig M, Fryns JP: PTPN11 mutations in LEOPARD syndrome. J Med Genet. 2002, 39: 571-4. 10.1136/jmg.39.8.571.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkozy A, Conti E, Seripa D, Digilio MC, Grifone N, Tandoi C, Fazio VM, Di Ciommo V, Marino B, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: Correlation between PTPN11 gene mutations and congenital heart defects in Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes. J Med Genet. 2003, 40: 704-8. 10.1136/jmg.40.9.704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conti E, Dottorini T, Sarkozy A, Tiller GE, Esposito G, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: A novel PTPN11 mutation in LEOPARD syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2003, 21: 654-10.1002/humu.9149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida R, Nagai T, Hasegawa T, Kinoshita E, Tanaka T, Ogata T: Two novel and one recurrent PTPN11 mutations in LEOPARD syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2004, 130 (4): 432-4. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keren B, Hadchouel A, Saba S, Sznajer Y, Bonneau D, Leheup B, Boute O, Gaillard D, Lacombe D, Layet V, Marlin S, Mortier G, Toutain A, Beylot C, Baumann C, Verloes A, Cave H: PTPN11 mutations in patients with leopard syndrome: A french multicentric experience. J Med Genet. 2004, 41: e117-10.1136/jmg.2004.021451.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkozy A, Obregon MG, Conti E, Esposito G, Mingarelli R, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: A novel ptpn11 gene mutation bridges noonan syndrome, Multiple Lentigines/LEOPARD syndrome and Noonan- like/Multiple Giant Cell Lesion syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004, 12: 1069-72. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, Pacileo G, Limongelli G, Marino B, Dallapiccola B: PTPN11 gene mutations: linking the Gln510Glu mutation to the "LEOPARD syndrome phenotype". Eur J Pediatr. 2006, 165: 803-5. 10.1007/s00431-006-0163-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du-Thanh A, Cave H, Bessis D, Puso C, Guilhou JJ, Dereure O: A novel PTPN11 gene mutation in a patient with LEOPARD syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 2007, 143: 1210-1. 10.1001/archderm.143.9.1210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tartaglia M, Mehler EL, Goldberg R, Zampino G, Brunner HG, Kremer H, Burgt van der I, Crosby AH, Ion A, Jeffery S, Kalidas K, Patton MA, Kucherlapati RS, Gelb BD: Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP- 2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2002, 30: 123-6. 10.1038/ng0102-123a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tartaglia M, Gelb BD: Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005, 6: 45-68. 10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi K, Kogaki S, Kurotobi S, Nasuno S, Ohta M, Okabe H, Wada K, Sakai N, Taniike M, Ozono K: A novel mutation in the PTPN11 gene in a patient with Noonan syndrome and rapidly progressive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Pediatr. 2005, 164: 497-500. 10.1007/s00431-005-1679-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zenker M, Buheitel G, Rauch R, Koenig R, Bosse K, Kress W, Tietze HU, Doerr HG, Hofbeck M, Singer H, Reis A, Rauch A: Genotype-phenotype correlations in Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr. 2004, 144: 368-74. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.11.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tartaglia M, Martinelli S, Stella L, Bocchinfuso G, Flex E, Cordeddu V, Zampino G, Burgt I, Palleschi A, Petrucci TC, Sorcini M, Schoch C, Foa R, Emanuel PD, Gelb BD: Diversity and functional consequences of germline and somatic PTPN11 mutations in human disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78: 279-90. 10.1086/499925.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kontaridis MI, Swanson KD, David FS, Barford D, Neel BG: PTPN11 (Shp2) mutations in LEOPARD syndrome have dominant negative, not activating, effects. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 6785-92. 10.1074/jbc.M513068200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalidas K, Shaw AC, Crosby AH, Newbury-Ecob R, Greenhalgh L, Temple IK, Law C, Patel A, Patton MA, Jeffery S: Genetic heterogeneity in LEOPARD syndrome: two families with no mutations in PTPN11. J Hum Genet. 2005, 50: 21-5. 10.1007/s10038-004-0212-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pandit B, Sarkozy A, Pennacchio LA, Carta C, Oishi K, Martinelli S, Pogna EA, Schackwitz W, Ustaszewska A, Landstrom A, Bos JM, Ommen SR, Esposito G, Lepri F, Faul C, Mundel P, Lopez Siguero JP, Tenconi R, Selicorni A, Rossi C, Mazzanti L, Torrente I, Marino B, Digilio MC, Zampino G, Ackerman MJ, Dallapiccola B, Tartaglia M, Gelb BD: Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1007-12. 10.1038/ng2073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wellbrock C, Karasarides M, Marais R: The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5: 875-85. 10.1038/nrm1498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Razzaque MA, Nishizawa T, Komoike Y, Yagi H, Furutani M, Amo R, Kamisago M, Momma K, Katayama H, Nakagawa M, Fujiwara Y, Matsushima M, Mizuno K, Tokuyama M, Hirota H, Muneuchi J, Higashinakagawa T, Matsuoka R: Germline gain-of-function mutations in RAF1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Gene. 2007, 39 (8): 1013-7. 10.1038/ng2078.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muslin AJ: Role of raf proteins in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte survival. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2005, 15: 225-9. 10.1016/j.tcm.2005.06.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burgt van der I: Noonan syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007, 2: 4-10.1186/1750-1172-2-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allanson J: Noonan syndrome. Management of Genetic Syndromes. Edited by: Cassidy SB, Allanson JE. 2005, New York, Wiley-LissGoogle Scholar
- Tartaglia M, Kalidas K, Shaw A, Song X, Musat DL, Burgt van der I, Brunner HG, Bertola DR, Crosby A, Ion A, Kucherlapati RS, Jeffery S, Patton MA, Gelb BD: PTPN11 mutations in Noonan syndrome: Molecular spectrum, genotype-phenotype correlation, and phenotypic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70: 1555-63. 10.1086/340847.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Opitz JM, Weaver DD: The neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1985, 21: 477-90. 10.1002/ajmg.1320210310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedman JM, Birch PH: Type 1 neurofibromatosis: a descriptive analysis of the disorder in 1,728 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1997, 70: 138-43. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970516)70:2<138::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Luca A, Bottillo I, Sarkozy A, Carta C, Neri C, Bellacchio E, Schirinzi A, Conti E, Zampino G, Battaglia A, Majore S, Rinaldi MM, Carella M, Marino B, Pizzuti A, Digilio MC, Tartaglia M, Dallapiccola B: NF1 gene mutations represent the major molecular event underlying neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77: 1092-101. 10.1086/498454.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertola DR, Pereira AC, Passetti F, de Oliveira PS, Messiaen L, Gelb BD, Kim CA, Krieger JE: Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome: molecular evidence of the concurrence of both disorders in a patient. Am J Med Genet A. 2005, 136: 242-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hüffmeier U, Zenker M, Hoyer J, Fahsold R, Rauch A: A variable combination of features of Noonan syndrome and neurofibromatosis type I are caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. Am J Med Genet A. 2006, 140: 2749-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson DA, Viskochil DH, Rope AF, Carey JC: Clinical and molecular aspects of an informative family with neurofibromatosis type 1 and Noonan phenotype. Clin Genet. 2006, 69: 246-53. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00576.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkozy A, Schirinzi A, Lepri F, Bottillo I, De Luca A, Pizzuti A, Tartaglia M, Digilio MC, Dallapiccola B: Clinical lumping and molecular splitting of LEOPARD and NF1/NF1-Noonan syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2007, 143 (9): 1009-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elliott P, McKenna WJ: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1881-91. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16358-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.