Guideline of transthyretin-related hereditary amyloidosis for clinicians

Transthyretin amyloidosis is a progressive and eventually fatal disease primarily characterized by sensory, motor, and autonomic neuropathy and/or cardiomyopathy. Given its phenotypic unpredictability and variability, transthyretin amyloidosis can be difficult to recognize and manage. Misdiagnosis is common, and patients may wait several years before accurate diagnosis, risking additional significant irreversible deterioration. This article aims to help physicians better understand transthyretin amyloidosis—and, specifically, familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy—so they can recognize and manage the disease more easily and discuss it with their patients. We provide guidance on making a definitive diagnosis, explain methods for disease staging and evaluation of disease progression, and discuss symptom mitigation and treatment strategies, including liver transplant and several pharmacotherapies that have shown promise in clinical trials.


Introduction
Transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis is a systemic disorder characterized by the extracellular deposition of amyloid fibrils composed of TTR, a plasma transport protein for thyroxine and vitamin A that is produced predominantly by the liver. TTR can dissociate from its native tetramer form, then misfold and aggregate into amyloid fibrils that accumulate in various organs and tissues, causing progressive dysfunction. TTR amyloidosis is the most common form of hereditary (familial) amyloidosis, and is caused by mutations that destabilize the TTR protein. TTR amyloidosis also encompasses an age-related amyloidosis known as senile systemic amyloidosis, an acquired disorder mainly affecting men after the age of 60 years, that results from the deposition of wild-type TTR amyloid.
TTR amyloidosis can present as a progressive, axonal sensory autonomic and motor neuropathy (familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy; TTR-FAP, also known as FAP or ATTR-PN) or as an infiltrative cardiomyopathy (familial amyloid cardiomyopathy). TTR amyloidosis, including TTR-FAP, presents in many different forms, with considerable phenotypic variation across individuals and geographic locations. Diagnosis can be challenging and treatment often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Physicians likely to diagnose and treat patients with this disease include neurologists, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, ophthalmologists, and other specialists.
The recommendations offered here, which focus primarily on the management of polyneuropathy symptoms, are based on the published literature, information gleaned from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS)a TTR amyloidosis patient registry, and the opinions of the authors. To further assist the treating physician, Appendix A contains lists of recommended reading and helpful websites.

Background
In 1952 Andrade reported a large group of patients in Portugal who had TTR-FAP with the Val30Met TTR mutation [1]. Over the next two decades other large foci were discovered in Japan and Sweden. Initially, TTR-FAP was thought to be restricted to endemic occurrences in those areas. However, owing to progress in bioche mical and molecular genetic analyses, TTR-FAP is now diagnosed worldwide. Most cases involve small kindreds or patients with no family history of the disease. To date, about 120 different single or double mutations, or a deletion in the TTR gene, have been reported; the majority of these TTR mutations are amyloidogenic, with fewer than ten considered non-pathogenic [2,3]. Val30Met is the most common mutation and the only one found in large foci of patients.
Some mutations induce cardiomyopathy as the predominant feature (e.g. Val122Ile, Ile68Leu, Thr60Ala, Leu111Met) while others are associated primarily with neuropathy (e.g. Val30Met), but both manifestations can be present in different proportions [4]. Less common disease signs include vitreous opacities, renal disease, and meningeal involvement. While genotype and population origin are important determinants of symptoms, the clinical picture of an affected individual may deteriorate over time (as amyloid continues to deposit in other tissues), and variability may be observed within the same family.
Genetics TTR-FAP has autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetrance. Carriers of the mutation have a circulating variant protein from fetal life but no amyloid deposition or symptomatic disease until adulthood, with development of disease probably controlled by factors associated with the biochemistry of aging [3,5]. The penetrance of the gene varies in different regions of the world and among families [6][7][8]. There is some evidence that affected women transmit higher disease penetrance to their offspring than affected men [9]. Because penetrance is incomplete, carriers of the gene may live to an advanced age without symptoms of the disease but may see their children become clinically affected. Genetic anticipation (earlier onset with greater severity in subsequent generations) has been observed in endemic regions [6,[10][11][12].

Prevalence and age at onset of TTR amyloidosis
Val30Met is the most prevalent TTR-FAP mutation in the world, focused in Portugal, Sweden, Japan, Brazil, and Majorca, and is believed to have arisen independently in Portugal and Sweden [13][14][15]. The largest cluster of individuals with TTR-FAP caused by the Val30Met mutation may be found in northern Portugal (Póvoa de Varzim and Vila do Conde), where the incidence is estimated to be one in 538 individuals [16]. In contrast, the incidence of hereditary TTR amyloidosis in the United States is estimated to be one in 100,000 individuals [17]. The cardiomyopathy-related Leu111Met and Val122Ile mutations are found primarily in Danish and African American populations, respectively. However, all mutations, including Val30Met, are identified across all countries in different families without any obvious relationship.
In Europe, the prevalence of TTR-FAP is estimated to be less than one in 100,000 individuals [18]. In endemic areas of northern Sweden (Piteå and Skelleftå), the frequency of the Val30Met mutation is 4%; however, the penetrance is relatively low (11% by 50 years) [6]. Conversely, in Portugal, the penetrance is high (80% by 50 years) [7]. Although also endemic in some areas of Japan, the prevalence of TTR-FAP is estimated to be lower than in Europe, at approximately one in 1,000,000 individuals [19].
The frequency of the Val122Ile mutation in the African American population is 3% to 3.9% [20,21], with most individuals developing late-onset cardiac amyloidosis. The frequency of Val122Ile in Caucasian and Hispanic populations in the United States is 0.44% and 0%, respectively [21]. The worldwide prevalence of TTR amyloidosis dominated by cardiomyopathy is unknown, but it is almost certainly underdiagnosed, particularly in the African American Val122Ile carrier population older than 65 years (approximately 135,000 individuals) [22,23].
The age at onset of disease-related symptoms varies between the second and ninth decades of life, with great variations across different populations. Expected age at onset is critical to determine when amyloidosis testing should be requisitioned. Portuguese and Japanese foci of patients with TTR-FAP have traditionally been described as early-onset (mean age, 33 years) [24,25], whereas Swedish patients with TTR-FAP are characterized by a later mean age of onset (56 years) [26]. Even in foci generally considered early-onset, some subgroups of patients experience a later onset. In Japan, especially, a form of later-onset TTR-FAP with no genealogical relationship to the two foci of this disease now predominates [24,27]. Patients with cardiomyopathy who have wild-type or variant TTR traditionally develop symptoms in their sixties.
The mean duration of disease onset to death is approximately 10 years but may vary depending on endemic region, genotype, symptoms, and other factors.

Clinical presentation of TTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP)
TTR-FAP is a multi-symptom disease that may present with peripheral neuropathy (sensory and motor), autonomic neuropathy, gastrointestinal impairment, cardiomyopathy, nephropathy, or ocular deposition. While the symptoms described below, including those of Val30Met TTR-FAP patients, may be present in patients with different TTR-FAP genotypes, phenotypes are not always uniform, and the same point mutation may have varied phenotypes even within the same family. Generally, however, most TTR-FAP cases are classified as neuropathic.

Variation in neuropathies of Val30Met TTR-FAP
The clinical picture for Val30Met TTR-FAP differs considerably between patients originating from endemic foci and patients with non-endemic origins [28]. In the former, disease onset often occurs before the age of 40 years, with a progressive sensory-motor and autonomic neuropathy, eventually causing cachexia and death 10 to 20 years after onset. Although sensory and motor manifestations are generally the presenting symptoms, the first clinical presentation can be autonomic neuropathy. However, even when the disease starts with sensory neuropathy, autonomic neuropathies often follow [29]. Patients with Val30Met TTR-FAP and non-endemic origins typically have onset at a late age (usually after the age of 60), with male predominance and an apparently sporadic disease presentation. Sensory and motor neuropathy symptoms of both upper and lower extremities may appear within a short period or even simultaneously, while autonomic neuropathies may be relatively mild [30][31][32].

Peripheral nerve dysfunction
TTR amyloidosis induces a length-dependent peripheral neuropathy. Initially the lower limbs are affected, and symptoms generally include toe discomfort such as numbness and spontaneous pain. At this stage, as amyloid typically first affects small nerve fibers altering pain and temperature sensation, clinical examination may detect impaired thermal sensitivity in the feet, with decreased pinprick sensation. In contrast, light touch may be relatively preserved and proprioception spared. Muscle strength and tendon reflexes are normal. This neuropathic manifestation typically reflects the involvement of unmyelinated and small myelinated fibers. A few months later sensory loss extends above the ankle on both sides. The neurologic deficit then progresses relentlessly, with the extension of sensory loss toward the proximal lower limbs. Motor deficit appears in the distal lower limbs, as does the impairment of light touch and deep sensations, which indicates the involvement of larger sensory and motor nerve fibers. Walking becomes increasingly difficult with loss of balance and steppage gait. Neuropathic pain is often of the burning type and is worse at night and associated with allodynia. As months and years pass, sensory deficit extends to the thighs, then the upper limbs, forearms, and fingers as the anterior trunk is involved. Motor deficits also follow a length-dependent progression and walking without assistance becomes increasingly difficult. Life-threatening autonomic dysfunction is generally present at this stage along with weight loss and muscle wasting. Loss of pain sensation with preservation of strength leads to painless trauma and the development of plantar ulcers and foot osteoarthropathy (Charcot's joints) [33]. Due to the random distribution of amyloid in the peripheral nervous system, deposits may accumulate locally and induce focal deficit of a cranial nerve, nerve trunk, or plexus. Carpal tunnel syndrome is an early but nonspecific manifestation of TTR-FAP. It should be noted that many patients with TTR-FAP are erroneously diagnosed with simple carpal tunnel syndrome; progressive symptoms or lack of improvement after carpal tunnel release surgery often leads to the correct diagnosis.
In patients who have peripheral neuropathy of unknown origin, testing for autonomic dysfunction should be considered because patients may not show overt symptoms of autonomic failure. Early recognition of autonomic failure may lead to an earlier diagnosis of the underlying pathogenesis of amyloidosis [34].

Other system involvement
Autonomic nervous system involvement includes anhidrosis, sexual impotence, disturbances of gastrointestinal motility (most commonly diarrhea alternating with constipation, but also constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting), orthostatic hypotension, and neurogenic bladder. In our experience, cardiac disease occurs in approximately 50% of patients with TTR-FAP, with most TTR mutations causing amyloid cardiomyopathy [35]. Anemia due to low erythropoietin levels also may be observed [36]. Ocular involvement, such as vitreous opacity, dry eye, glaucoma, and pupillary disorders, is common [37]. In contrast, kidney involvement is unusual.
Additional symptoms of TTR-FAP include hoarseness, coldness, decreased skin temperature, dyscoria, dysesthesia, muscle weakness and atrophy, dissociated anesthesia, and constitutional conditions such as weight loss, arrhythmia, edema, and burning.

When should a neurologist suspect TTR-FAP?
It is important to differentiate a diagnostic process in individuals with a known amyloid family history, especially in endemic areas, from that in patients without such a history (Table 1). In patients with a known family history of TTR-FAP, the onset of symptoms and signs of peripheral neuropathy, manifestations of autonomic dysfunction, and cardiac arrhythmia call for confirmation of the involvement of these organs by appropriate investigations (see Tests and Assessments, below). When there is no known family history of amyloidosis, the diagnosis of TTR-FAP should be considered in patients with a progressive, length-dependent axonal polyneuropathy predominantly affecting temperature and pain sensation. Special attention must be paid to patients with concurrent autonomic dysfunction, cardiac involvement, and carpal tunnel syndrome.
The multisystem involvement of TTR-FAP is a clue to the diagnosis. It is important to consider the diagnosis of TTR-FAP when one or, especially, several of the following are present: Family history of neuropathic disease, especially associated with heart failure Neuropathic pain or progressive sensory disturbances of unknown etiology Carpal tunnel syndrome without obvious cause, particularly if it is bilateral and requires surgical release Gastrointestinal motility disturbances or autonomic nerve dysfunction of unknown etiology (e.g. erectile dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension, neurogenic bladder) Cardiac disease characterized by thickened ventricular walls in the absence of hypertension Advanced atrio-ventricular block of unknown origin, particularly when accompanied by a thickened heart Vitreous body inclusions of the cotton-wool type

TTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy
Although TTR amyloidosis is considered principally a neurologic disease, the clinical spectrum varies widely from almost exclusive neurologic involvement within an endemic cohort to a strictly cardiologic presentation in sporadic cases [38][39][40][41]. TTR-related cardiac amyloidosis is thought to be vastly underdiagnosed, particularly when neurologic involvement is mild or absent [42].

Cardiovascular manifestations
In both hereditary and nonhereditary TTR amyloidosis, as in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid can infiltrate any or all of the cardiovascular structures, including the conduction system, the atrial and ventricular myocardium, valvular tissue, and the coronary and large arteries [38,39,43]. The conduction system is commonly affected, leading to bundle branch block and, occasionally, atrioventricular (AV) and sinoatrial block. Myocardial infiltration progressively increases the thickness of the left and right ventricular walls and the interventricular septum. Cardiac amyloidosis is generally considered to be a cardiomyopathy with a hypertrophic phenotype and restrictive pathophysiology, although a true restrictive filling pattern is seen only in advanced stages [44]. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is normal or only mildly reduced. However, abnormalities in long-axis function of both ventricles  on tissue Doppler imaging are frequent and precede the impairment of circumferential ventricular function [45]. The involvement of the cardiac valves leads to the formation of nodules or diffuse thickening of the leaflets, accompanied by variable degrees (generally mild) of valvular regurgitation. The clinical spectrum of cardiovascular involvement is wide, ranging from asymptomatic AV and bundle branch block to severe, rapidly progressive heart failure due to restrictive pathophysiology. These variations are related to the specific TTR mutation, geographic area, and endemic/non-endemic demographics of individual cases.
When should a cardiologist suspect TTR amyloidosis?
Cardiologists may encounter TTR amyloidosis in patients who are referred with neurologic impairment or previously diagnosed TTR-FAP, and in patients who present with cardiologic problems without any apparent signs of neurologic disease. If there is a strong suspicion or an existing diagnosis of TTR-FAP, the cardiologist should look for signs of cardiac amyloid involvement (Appendix B). In such situations, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, scintigraphy with bone tracers, biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] and troponin I or T) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging usually provide all the necessary information to diagnose infiltrative cardiomyopathy. The study of longitudinal LV function with tissue Doppler echocardiography and 99m Tc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid ( 99m Tc-DPD) myocardial scintigraphy are particularly revealing for very early signs of myocardial involvement [45][46][47]. Although as a general rule histological evidence of amyloid deposits is essential for a final diagnosis of amyloidosis, in a patient with molecularly proven diagnosis of TTR amyloidosis, identification of unexplained ventricular hypertrophy and other typical instrumental findings (see below) provides convincing evidence of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy. When the phenotypic expression of TTR amyloidosis is exclusively or predominantly cardiac, the situation is far more challenging. Affected patients may present for a wide variety of reasons, including symptoms of heart failure, arrhythmias, syncope, orthostatic hypotension, and ECG/echocardiographic abnormalities in the absence of symptoms. The problem of differential diagnosis from cardiomyopathies of other causes is common, and a frequent pitfall is the misdiagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis as sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A particularly challenging situation regards elderly African-Americans with hypertension, increased LV wall thickness, and minimal or no neuropathy, since a diagnosis of TTR amyloidosis in such patients may be overlooked. A logical first step is to look for the infiltrative phenotype with echocardiography and for any major discrepancy between the assessment of LV mass with echocardiography and ECG (for example, when increased mass via echocardiography is not accompanied by ECG signs of LV hypertrophy) [38,42]. Another useful clue can be the recognition of right-sided heart failure, unusual in hypertensive heart disease [42]. 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy can assist in the differential diagnosis between TTR-related cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric hyptertrophic cardiomyopathy, since only myocardium infiltrated by TTR uptakes the tracer [48].
Apart from evident neurologic manifestations, some clinical signs can raise the suspicion of hereditary TTR amyloidosis in a patient with apparently isolated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. These signs include a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy, unexplained intense myalgias and burning sensations, and autonomic dysfunction. Careful evaluation for these signs is mandatory, as they can sometimes be very mild and may not be reported by the patient.

Leptomeningeal TTR amyloidosis
Attention has recently focused on the relatively rare leptomeningeal form of TTR amyloidosis, which is induced by several point mutations in the TTR gene and also found in the advanced stages of Val30Met TTR-FAP [37]. In most cases, it is believed that the source of variant TTR in leptomeningeal amyloidosis is not the liver but the choroid plexus [49]. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and ocular amyloidosis are common clinical features of this type of TTR amyloidosis. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is characterized by amyloid deposition in the media and adventitia of medium-sized and small arteries, arterioles, and, occasionally, veins of the cortex and leptomeninges. Typical clinical central nervous system manifestations include cerebral infarction and hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, ataxia, spastic paralysis, convulsion, and dementia. These symptoms are often found in several types of TTR amyloidosis and they lead to the classification of (oculo)leptomeningeal amyloidosis, in which amyloid deposition is also found in vitreous bodies and other tissues of the eye. Although amyloid deposits in the meningocerebrovascular system are thought to be the cause of those central nervous system symptoms, the precise mechanism of amyloid formation remains to be elucidated.

Other organ involvement
Gastrointestinal symptoms, as a manifestation of autonomic neuropathy, are recognized from an early stage of TTR-FAP and include nausea, early satiety, recurrent vomiting, watery diarrhea, severe constipation, and/or alternating diarrhea and constipation. As a result, weight loss may be observed in the course of the disease. Renal complications, while infrequent, include albuminuria and/or mild azotemias. Dry eye is an early autonomic symptom of TTR-FAP, and a decrease in visual acuity induced by vitreous opacity or glaucoma is recognized as TTR-FAP progresses.

Tests and assessments
Overview Neurologic examination should indicate the presence or absence of a length-dependent sensorimotor axonal neuropathy affecting temperature and pain detection in the feet. Ultimately a patient should undergo a complete neurologic examination, which may include electromyographic testing with sympathetic skin response (SSR), quantitative sensory testing, heart rate deep breathing, and other autonomic tests, determined by presenting physical signs. Cardiac evaluation should include ECG, echocardiography, BNP/troponin measurement and, in select cases, cardiac magnetic resonance, scintigraphy with bone tracers, and Holter monitoring. Following this workup the patient should undergo a DNA analysis and tissue biopsy (Table 1), although the uneven distribution of amyloid fibrils may yield false-negative results. While experienced neurologists in endemic areas may be able to diagnose TTR-FAP by the presence of reported family history of the disease as well as relevant symptoms alone, a biopsy showing amyloid deposits is mandatory in patients without a family history (late-onset and apparently sporadic forms) and in populations with a low disease prevalence. Genetic testing is needed to document the pathogenic mutation. If it is normal, TTR-FAP is excluded. Symptoms and stage of disease progression can be identified by neurologic tests and the modified body mass index (mBMI; BMI multiplied by serum albumin level [g/L] to compensate for edema formation) [50], a measure of nutritional status and wasting.

Tissue biopsy
To confirm amyloidosis, the demonstration of amyloid deposits via tissue biopsy is essential. Deposition of amyloid in the tissue can be demonstrated by Congo red staining of biopsy specimens [51]. With Congo red staining, amyloid deposits show a characteristic green birefringence under polarized light. Tissues suitable for biopsy include subcutaneous fatty tissue of the abdominal wall, kidney, skin, gastric, or rectal mucosa; sural nerve tissue; retinaculum and peritendinous fat obtained at carpal tunnel surgery; and tissue from the salivary gland. The sensitivity of endoscopic biopsy of the gastrointestinal mucosa is approximately 85%, whereas biopsy of the sural nerve is less sensitive because amyloid deposition is often sporadic and random [52]. TTR immunolabeling of the amyloid deposits can identify the disease as TTR amyloidosis but cannot distinguish wild-type from hereditary forms. In patients with typical signs and symptoms of TTR amyloidosis, negative biopsy results should not be interpreted as excluding the disease.

Serum variant TTR protein
TTR protein normally circulates in serum or plasma as a soluble protein with a tetrameric structure. The normal plasma TTR concentration is 20 to 40 mg dL -1 (0.20 to 0.40 mg mL -1 ). After immunoprecipitation with anti-TTR antibody, serum variant TTR protein can be detected by mass spectrometry [53]. Approximately 90% of TTR variants identified exhibit the mass shift predicted by the one amino acid substitution of the variant TTR [54].

Genetic confirmation
Although mass spectrometry can demonstrate a mass difference between wild-type and TTR protein variants in serum, it does not specify the site and kind of amino acid substitution in a number of disease-related TTR gene mutations; thus, DNA sequencing is usually required. Current techniques for performing sequence analysis of TTR, the only gene known to be associated with TTR amyloidosis, detect >99% of disease-causing mutations.

Exclusionary diagnoses AL amyloidosis
The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis is often considered due to the high incidence of monoclonal gammopathies in the elderly. Differentiation of AL and TTR amyloid polyneuropathy requires analysis of the subunit protein comprising amyloid tissue deposits. Amyloid immunohistochemical staining has been the standard approach; however, the antibody staining can be misleading because of suboptimal antibody reagents or excessive background staining. In contrast, immunoelectron microscopy may provide a clear-cut characterization of amyloid fibrils, but this technique is not widely available. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis or immuno-gold electron microscopy can be useful in this setting, but TTR genopositivity should be established by DNA analysis in all cases of suspected FAP.

Mimicking neuropathies
Some adult patients with diabetes mellitus may develop a polyneuropathy similar to TTR-FAP with early and predominant small-fiber involvement and autonomic dysfunction. Chronic alcoholism can also induce a peripheral neuropathy that is indistinguishable from TTR-FAP disease.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
When a family history is not known, a diagnosis of CIDP is often considered first. In CIDP, large myelinated fiber dysfunction predominates, with slow conduction velocity, high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein content, and virtually no symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. However, axonal lesions predominate in some cases. In addition, nerve conduction velocity is often mildly decreased in patients with TTR-FAP, and CSF protein content can be elevated, which may increase the confusion with CIDP [40]. In such cases, a nerve biopsy may differentiate amyloid from CIDP by revealing congophilic deposits.

Tests for neuropathic symptoms
Neuropathic symptoms can be assessed by the polyneuropathy disability (PND) score; neuropathy symptom score; neurologic disability score (NDS); neuropathy impairment score (total NIS), and neuropathy impairment score-lower limb (NIS-LL), scales that quantify neurologic function in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy but are also valuable for patients with TTR-FAP; autonomic reflex screen; composite autonomic severity score; mBMI; electromyography with SSR; and other original scores or local variants.

Tools for evaluating TTR-FAP progression
The progression of TTR-FAP can be evaluated by nerve conduction velocity, sensory action potentials, motor action potentials, SSR amplitude, NDS, NIS-LL, and quantitative sensory testing for characterizing small-fiber (coolness and heat detection) and large-fiber (vibratory detection) peripheral sensory thresholds. Autonomic function is assessed by heart rate deep breathing measures. Other means of assessing the progression of TTR-FAP include echocardiography, Holter monitoring, ophthalmologic testing, mBMI measurement, and electrophysiologic evaluation. Measurements should be made every 6 months.
Laboratory examinations for evaluating TTR-FAP progression include measuring cardiac (plasma BNP, NT-proBNP, and high-sensitivity serum troponin concentration) and renal (creatinine clearance and albuminuria) parameters.

Scoring systems
Several scoring systems for evaluating TTR-FAP have been proposed from various clinical centers (Appendix C). These include systems based on the stages of peripheral and autonomic neuropathies proposed by Coutinho et al. [55], disease staging based on PND score, the Portuguese classification to evaluate the severity of TTR-FAP [56], sensory impairment scoring, autonomic dysfunction scoring, and scoring of motor function for muscle weakness.

Disease-modifying treatments for ttr-fap
Current treatment options for patients with TTR amyloidosis are limited. For patients with TTR-FAP who have mild or moderate disease and a diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing and biopsy, liver transplant is the current standard of care. However, symptomatic treatment to provide immediate relief is a priority ( Table 2). Since variant TTR is produced largely in the liver, transplanting a new liver should almost completely eliminate production of the variant protein and halt disease progression outside the brain and eyes. However, liver transplant does not effectively prevent cardiomyopathy in most cases and is not recommended for patients with late-stage TTR-FAP or with leptomeningeal-type amyloidosis. For these patients, symptomatic relief is the only treatment strategy at present. The first pharmacologic agent for patients with TTR-FAP was approved in Europe in late 2011, and several other agents are in various stages of clinical development. These pharmacotherapies are described in more detail below.

Liver transplant
Orthotopic liver transplant is the only disease-modifying treatment available to patients with TTR-FAP. This removes roughly 95% of the production of variant TTR and can slow or halt the progression of the disease. In most countries liver transplant is performed using organs from deceased donors, but in Japan liver tissue from live donors is used more frequently. Liver transplants for the treatment of TTR-FAP are reported by participating centers to the Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy World Transplant Registry (FAPWTR, Appendix A).
Nerve function rarely improves after successful liver transplantation; however, a lessening of autonomic disturbances may occur. It is generally agreed that the best outcomes achieved with liver transplant occur when the procedure is performed in young patients whose disease has not become advanced. Notably, some patients do not perceive an improvement in their quality of life (QOL) although their disease progression has been halted and survival improved.
To be eligible for liver transplant, a patient should have genetic proof of TTR-FAP, biopsy proof of amyloid deposits, and symptoms of early-stage TTR-FAP. Liver transplantation in later stages (e.g. PND stage II or III; see Appendix C) may be complicated by progressive amyloid cardiomyopathy or neuropathy, prompting many amyloid experts to recommend liver transplant only in patients with early disease.

Outcomes of liver transplant for patients with TTR-FAP
Many patients have benefitted from liver transplant and are able to live relatively normal lives, although the organ impairment that occurred before the transplant does not usually reverse. Long-term observations of transplanted patients have clearly shown the histopathologic regression of amyloid deposits [54] with an overall patient survival rate at 5 years of >77% [57]. Current data from the FAPWTR indicate a 10-year survival rate of 74% for Val30Met versus 44% for non-Val30Met patients, emphasizing mutation-specific utility of liver transplantation in TTR-FAP [57]. In addition, some patients continue to demonstrate disease progression following liver transplant. Mounting evidence indicates that TTR-FAP patients with significant amyloid infiltration of the heart or nerves at the time of liver transplantation may experience progression of disease postoperatively due to wild-type TTR deposition on existing amyloid of variant TTR [58]. In addition to the risks of surgery, transplanted patients also need to remain on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives.
Prognosis after liver transplant is influenced by many factors, including the properties of particular TTR variants, nutritional status, age, and severity of neuropathy and cardiac amyloid involvement. Studies of survival as well as physical and mental improvement after transplant are still needed, especially for patients with a non-Val30Met mutation.

Domino liver transplant (DLT)
The cornerstone of transplantation is organ availability. Despite advances in this field, a significant proportion of patients with liver failure may die without a chance at liver replacement. Because liver involvement in TTR-FAP is minimal, the liver of an affected individual can be grafted into selected patients (without TTR-FAP) who meet the criteria for transplant but for whom the current allocation schemes for cadaveric organs may not allow transplant within a reasonable time. This procedure has been termed DLT. Since 1995, more than 950 DLTs have been performed worldwide [59]. The assumption was that amyloidosis would not appear for several decades after liver transplant because patients rarely become symptomatic before the age of 20 years and most often not until their forties or fifties [60]. However, de novo systemic amyloidosis after DLT was found to appear in a small number of patients earlier than initially expected, and a number of DLT recipients have since been retransplanted due to the transmission of TTR-FAP through a domino graft 8 to 10 years after the initial transplant [61]. Also, subclinical cutaneous TTR deposits were reported in five other recipients of DLT grafts [61,62]. Despite this, the donor shortage still justifies DLT in selected patients. Post-transplant surveillance for amyloid disease requires tissue biopsy and electromyography in combination with observation for clinical manifestations. Recipients of DLTs need to be monitored for signs of de novo amyloid disease after transplant. DLTs are also reported to the FAPWTR, within the Domino Liver Transplant Registry (Appendix A).

Combined heart and liver transplant
Cardiac risks and complications constitute major adverse events in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant for TTR-FAP. Cardiovascular complications account for about 39% of deaths following liver transplant, almost half of which occur within the first 3 months [57,63]. Moreover, cardiac disease may progress even after successful liver transplant, especially in patients with mutations other than Val30Met, due to the deposition of wild-type TTR fibrils on preexisting amyloid matrix. In highly selected patients these considerations may provide a rationale for the extremely challenging procedure of combined heart and liver transplant [60]. The main indication for this procedure is severe heart failure due to amyloidotic cardiomyopathy in a patient without

ISIS-TTRRx
ISIS-TTRRx (Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, USA) is an antisense therapy that suppresses TTR mRNA expression. A phase 1 study demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction of TTR in healthy patients with no reported significant adverse events [66]. A phase 2/3 study examining the effect of the anti-sense oligonucleotide on disease progression and QOL in patients with TTR-FAP is scheduled to begin in 2012.

Doxycycline/tauroursodeoxycholic acid (Doxy-TUDCA)
The combined use of doxycycline, an antibiotic that disrupts TTR amyloid fibril formation, and TUDCA, a drug used in patients with liver disorders that can reduce nonfibrillar TTR deposition, has demonstrated a synergistic effect on lowering TTR deposits in mouse models of TTR-FAP [67]. A phase 2 open-label trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Doxy-TUDCA is ongoing [68].

Symptom management of ttr-fap
Staging overview (based on Coutinho [55]) Patients with stage 0 disease are asymptomatic but have both a variant form of the TTR gene and evidence of amyloid deposits. Patients with stage I (mild) disease are ambulatory, patients with stage II (moderate) disease are ambulatory but require assistance, and patients with stage III (severe) disease are bedridden or wheelchairbound.

Stage 0 disease
As disease onset is often late and diagnosis is difficult, for many patients sometimes a definitive diagnosis is made only in their sixties or seventies, although some patients are diagnosed in their thirties or earlier. In some countries, such as Portugal, patients tend to be young at diagnosis, but in all cases these patients are likely to have offspring or even grandchildren who may want to be tested for TTR gene mutation. Offspring who are positive for the mutated gene and test positive for amyloid deposits are considered to have stage 0 disease. Patients with stage 0 disease could be considered candidates for pharmacotherapy, but because there are no data to support the efficacy and safety of treatment for such patients, they should be treated only within the confines of a clinical trial.

Stage I disease
It is important to emphasize that, as with many diseases, early detection is critical and can lead to the best outcomes. From the outset, patients should be treated symptomatically and stabilized (Table 2). Since the only widely available, approved treatment for TTR-FAP is liver transplant, all patients with stage I disease, irrespective of mutation status or age, should be placed on a liver transplant list. Early liver transplant is important, and younger patients with mild symptoms are the best candidates. Concurrently, patients should be treated with any approved drugs as they become available and as the patient's disease state meets drug indications, independent of liver transplant plans. Small-molecule inhibitors, such as tafamidis and diflunisal, may prolong the time from disease onset to progression. Future studies will determine whether one or both of these agents will have durable inhibitory effects on TTR amyloidotic neuropathy and cardiomyopathy.
To be eligible for treatment, symptomatic patients should have a confirmed diagnosis of TTR-FAP. Genetic documentation as well as a positive amyloid biopsy would be a sufficient confirmation of diagnosis. Patients living in highly endemic areas of the world with a TTR mutation and typical symptoms, depending on the conventions of the medical community, may not require a positive biopsy for treatment consideration (sites of amyloid deposits can vary, so not all will be positive on biopsy). However, if there is no biopsy evidence of amyloid deposition, confounding diagnoses, such as pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy, need to be excluded.
Patients who have been placed on pharmacotherapy with objective evidence of disease progression should pursue other treatment options such as liver transplant.
For patients exhibiting disease stabilization on pharmacotherapy, there is currently no consensus among experts regarding the utility of liver transplant, as longterm pharmacologic data are not available to address treatment durability.
Follow-up assessments should be performed on an average of every 6 months by an experienced physician to identify disease progression. This is particularly important for patients who have early and/or substantial cardiac involvement. The actual battery of assessments to follow patients should, at a minimum, mirror the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS) evaluation (full sensory and motor evaluation and echocardiography) and include the NIS-LL (which can be measured by nonexpert physicians), mBMI, and electroneuromyography.

Stage II disease
Data supporting the use of disease-modifying pharmacotherapy in patients with stage II disease are not available at this time. Market approval for tafamidis in Europe is limited to patients with stage I disease. Patients with early stage II disease may also be considered for liver transplant. Whether TTR-stabilizing pharmacotherapy will prove effective in slowing or stopping disease progression in patients with stage II disease requires further clinical study. These patients, as well as patients with stage II disease who demonstrate cardiac involvement, should receive disease-modifying pharmacotherapy only within the confines of a clinical trial.

Stage III disease
While it is theoretically possible that the pharmacologic treatment of patients who have stage III disease might prolong or improve their QOL, no data are available to support this. Such patients should receive diseasemodifying pharmacotherapy only within the confines of a clinical trial.

Liver transplant recipients
The pharmacologic treatment of liver transplant recipients may be appropriate, but currently there are no data available to support the use of disease-modifying therapies in these patients. A phase 2 study of combined doxycycline/ TUDCA for the treatment of patients with TTR amyloidosis includes liver transplant recipients (Appendix D).

DLT recipients
Although a rationale exists for treating DLT recipients with pharmacotherapy, no data are available to support this practice. Drug treatments should not be considered without evidence of amyloid deposition (e.g. biopsy proof ). At present, DLT recipients should be treated only in a clinical trial.

Patient support
All efforts should be made to identify TTR-FAP early. Once patients have developed stage I disease they should be treated symptomatically regardless of disease presentation. The goal is to alleviate symptoms and subsequently establish a long-term strategy. Tafamidis, diflunisal, or any other treatments shown to be efficacious should be started at once. Until more data are available, patients with laterstage disease should be treated only within clinical trials. The questions of early prophylaxis and posttransplant administration have yet to be formally addressed but offer rich possibilities for further research.
For patients requiring liver transplant, local regulations covering eligibility for transplant vary widely, with age limits in some countries among other restrictions. Physicians should discuss all possible options with their patients. It is not clear whether guidelines for transplant will change once new medications are approved.
TTR-FAP is extremely difficult to manage; thus, patients and their families need all the social and moral support possible. It is important to stress that the physician involved should be a specialist in peripheral nerve disease and be experienced in alleviating the symptoms associated with neuropathies. Some countries will have specific centers of excellence, but this is not the case everywhere.

Genetically related family members
Genetic testing should be performed on relatives of patients with TTR-FAP when they are capable of comprehending the medical, social, and psychological ramifications of a positive result. Relatives should be strongly encouraged to undergo genetic testing and, if positive, tissue biopsies. Treatment options can then be considered. However, for some individuals, including those with a family history of late-onset disease, early genetic testing may produce severe anxiety to which the physician needs to be sensitive. In all cases, genetic counseling and, if necessary, psychological support should be offered to affected family members. In some countries long-term insurance eligibility is affected by genetic disease and should be considered before DNA analysis.

Disease registries
Physicians are encouraged to enter their patients into the appropriate registry or registries. These registries act as valuable resources for disease awareness (for both the public and the provider), inform clinical practice habits, and identify gaps in knowledge. Information on enrollment can be found on the websites listed in Appendix A.

THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey)
THAOS, an international, longitudinal, observational survey, developed by FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, (and now supported by Pfizer Inc) in collaboration with clinical disease experts, is designed to characterize the variability, progression, and natural history of TTR amyloidosis, as well as regional differences in disease expression and the genotypic/phenotypic relationship in TTR amyloidosis. This ongoing survey seeks to gather information on patients diagnosed with TTR amyloidosis to better understand this rare disease. As of March 2012, a total of 1224 individuals (657 male and 567 female) had enrolled at 46 sites in 19 countries. Of these, 1111 individuals had TTR mutations, of whom 834 had the Val30Met mutation and 781 were symptomatic.

FAPWTR
The FAPWTR monitors the history of patients with TTR-FAP who had undergone liver transplant. As of December 31, 2011, a total of 1985 liver transplant recipients were recorded in the FAPWTR, including 37 combined heartliver transplants. Currently 73 centers perform liver transplant in 19 countries [59]. The objectives of the FAPWTR are to promote the collaboration and exchange of experience, monitor international transplant activity, help optimize patient selection and ensure adequate follow-up after transplant, and function as an investigative tool for reporting centers.

Domino liver transplant registry
The Domino Liver Transplant Registry documents patients who have received a liver from a patient affected with amyloidosis. Originally it was believed that symptoms would take decades to develop, but recently some patients have become diseased much sooner.

Conclusion
TTR amyloidosis is a progressive and fatal disease that is increasingly diagnosed worldwide. Previously, liver transplant was the only available treatment for patients with TTR-FAP; the approval of tafamidis in 2011 for use in Europe in patients with stage I TTR-FAP has broadened therapeutic options.
The most reliable diagnostic approach involves genetic testing followed by a tissue biopsy to confirm active amyloid formation. Common symptoms also exist for which there are assessment and scoring tools that are important for documenting disease progression. Most importantly, patients should be treated symptomatically regardless of presentation and, if possible, stabilized, since the immediate goal is to alleviate symptoms. Physicians should also probe for certain autonomic symptoms, such as irritable bowel syndrome and erectile dysfunction, which may not always be revealed on a standard examination. Such symptoms can then be addressed. All patients with early-stage disease should be evaluated for liver transplant and concurrently considered for drug treatment. Patients with later-stage disease or cardiomyopathy have not yet been shown to benefit from pharmacotherapy. The decision to remain on the transplant list, if improvement is seen with drug treatment, depends on local rules and on each individual case. To help make this decision, physicians should monitor their patients every 6 months with full sensory and motor evaluation, echocardiography, NDS, and mBMI.
Many questions remain, including how to treat asymptomatic patients with the TTR-FAP Val30Met mutation and patients with stage 0 disease who have documented amyloid, as there are no data to support prophylactic treatment. In addition, there are no recommendations regarding pharmacotherapy for liver transplant or DLT recipients. Current and upcoming clinical trials will provide a basis for the proper administration of new drug treatments and improved guidance for the use of currently available agents.

Recommended reading
Benson MD, Kincaid JC: The molecular biology and clinical features of amyloid neuropathy.

Appendix B
Recommended studies for TTR amyloidosis patients with cardiomyopathy ECG and echocardiographic examinations The preliminary workup for a patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis includes 12-lead ECG and twodimensional echocardiography. Echocardiography provides the mainstay for the noninvasive diagnosis of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy. A key point is to consider not only LV wall thickness but other findings that could suggest cardiac infiltration. Based on a study of patients with a definite diagnosis of AL amyloidosis, Gertz et al. [69] suggested a composite echocardiographic approach based on the presence of end-diastolic thickness of the interventricular septum >1.2 cm (in the absence of any other cause of ventricular hypertrophy) plus two or all of the following: homogeneous AV valve thickening, atrial septum thickening, and sparkling/granular appearance of the ventricular septum. This has also proved to be valid for assessing other etiologic forms of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy [70]. Pericardial effusion is another frequent finding in cardiac amyloidosis.
The combination of pericardial effusion and increased ventricular wall thickness should prompt a strong suspicion of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy. In such cases, the ventricles are usually not dilated and LV ejection fraction tends to be normal or only slightly reduced, but the wallthickening velocity is frequently depressed [71]. Similarly, the long-axis function of the left ventricle is often reduced even in the early stages of the disease when radial fractional shortening is still conserved [72,73].
Disease profile and instrumental features (as well as clinical outcome) are related to the specific etiologic form of cardiac amyloidosis, and profound differences exist among the three most frequent pathogenic types of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy (AL, wild-type, and mutant TTR amyloidosis). In a large series of patients with amyloidotic cardiomyopathy, the mean value of wall thickness was, on average, lower in patients with AL than in patients with hereditary TTR or senile systemic amyloidosis, although the overlapping distributions seem to preclude the use of this measure for differential diagnosis [70]. Conversely, echocardiographic features suggestive of amyloidotic involvement commonly appear only in the later stages of the disease [38,72]. Thus, echocardiographic images cannot be used in isolation for diagnostic confirmation and must be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture and other examinations. Perhaps the single most useful sign is the presence of low or normal QRS voltage despite increased LV wall thickness. Unfortunately, this highly specific sign is not very sensitive, and the prevalence of low QRS voltage (QRS voltage amplitude ≤0.5 mV in all limb leads or ≤1 mV in all precordial leads) usually is significantly lower in patients with TTR amyloidosis than in patients with AL [70]. This observation underscores the importance of pursuing any clinical suspicion of TTR amyloidotic cardiomyopathy, even in the absence of reduced QRS voltage.
Other common ECG abnormalities include repolarization alterations; anterior, inferior, or lateral pseudoinfarct patterns; left anterior hemiblock; bundle branch block; ischemic-type or nonspecific T-wave abnormalities [74,75], and rhythm disturbances (e.g. atrial fibrillation). A low-voltage ECG with increased septal and posterior LV wall thickness on echocardiography is specific for cardiac amyloidosis on noninvasive testing [74,75].

MRI
MRI with delayed gadolinium enhancement has proved very useful for the detection of amyloid protein in the myocardial interstitium. Since gadolinium tends to accumulate within the interstitium infiltrated by amyloid, in the presence of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy MRI provides two highly specific findings: alterations in gadolinium kinetics, with a faster-than-normal washout of gadolinium from the blood and myocardium, and a late enhancement effect, often with a predominant diffuse, global, and subendocardial distribution [76], although in some cases accumulation of amyloid in the myocardial interstitium may appear more focal with variable transmural extension [77].
Current MRI studies collectively describe patients with different types of systemic amyloidosis, including TTR amyloidosis, who exhibit previous diagnostic signs common to all types of amyloidosis. Therefore, it is unknown whether MRI has the capability to distinguish between amyloid types.

Scintigraphy
Myocardial amyloid involvement can be visualized by several scintigraphic tracers, each of which binds to distinct parts of amyloid fibrils [78]. 123 I-labeled serum amyloid P (SAP) protein binds in a calcium-dependent way to all amyloid deposits, irrespective of the protein of origin. SAP scintigraphy (which is available only in a few highly specialized centers) provides a reliable semiquantitative evaluation of the extent and distribution of amyloid deposits in the soft tissues and visceral organs, but not specifically in the heart [79][80][81]. 99m Tc-aprotinin, a protease inhibitor, is able to detect extra-abdominal amyloid deposits, such as cardiac deposits, thanks to the physiologic uptake of the tracer in the liver, spleen, and kidneys [82,83]. However, available experience is limited and quantitative assessment is not feasible [79,[82][83][84]. One tracer that has been used for detecting cardiac amyloid deposition is 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). Although 123 I-MIBG does not bind directly to amyloid deposits, 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy has proven useful in the functional evaluation of amyloid cardiomyopathy because it indirectly reveals the impairment of cardiac sympathetic nerve endings due to amyloid deposition [79,85,86]. There is increasing evidence that 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy can image amyloid deposition in the myocardium with a greater sensitivity among patients with TTR-related cardiac amyloidosis (both mutant and wild-type) than immunoglobulin AL-related amyloidosis, and that, compared with a small series of normal controls, it is a highly specific imaging tool that can facilitate the differential diagnosis between TTR and AL cardiac amyloidosis in routine practice [47,87].

Clinical trials Tafamidis
The efficacy and safety of tafamidis were evaluated in a phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Fx-005) in which patients received oral tafamidis 20 mg once daily (n = 65) or placebo (n = 63) for 18 months [88]. Co-primary end points were NIS-LL response to treatment (<2 point increase from baseline) at 18 months and change from baseline to 18 months in QOL as measured by a modified Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (total QOL; TQOL) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study medication and had ≥1 post-baseline assessment for each primary end point, or who discontinued due to death or liver transplant. In this ITT population, while statistical significance was not reached for either of these endpoints, patients treated with tafamidis overall experienced numerically less disease progression and less worsening of quality of life than did patients treated with placebo. In the pre-specified efficacy evaluable population analysis at 18 months, the results showed a significantly greater percentage of patients in the tafamidis group with no disease progression based on the NIS-LL responder analysis when compared with the placebo group, while the tafamidis group demonstrated significantly less worsening in quality of life than the placebo group.
Tafamidis appeared to be safe and well tolerated; treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea, upper abdominal pain, urinary tract infection, and vaginal infection. An open-label extension study (n = 86) was conducted to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy [89]. Slowing of disease progression was observed in patients treated for either 30 or 18 months with tafamidis (i.e. the tafamidis-tafamidis and placebotafamidis cohorts, respectively), although earlier initiation of treatment was associated with better outcomes, including less neurologic deterioration and preserved nutritional status and QOL. No new safety concerns (as compared with the pivotal study) were observed over 30 months, and no patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events.
Two additional phase 2, open-label safety and efficacy studies of oral tafamidis 20 mg once daily in patients with non-Val30Met TTR amyloidosis have been completed, with results expected to be published in late 2012. In the polyneuropathy study, 21 patients with non-Val30Met TTR-FAP received tafamidis for 12 months, with TTR stabilization at week 6 compared with baseline as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of treatmentemergent adverse events and change from baseline in NIS and NIS-LL, nerve conduction studies, mBMI, TQOL, and NT-proBNP and troponin I cardiac biomarkers. Data suggest that non-Val30Met patients treated with tafamidis experience slower neurologic progression (NIS-LL) and sustained quality of life (TQOL) and nutritional status (mBMI) as compared with the placebo-treated Val30Met patients in the pivotal trial [90]. In the infiltrative cardiomyopathy study, 35 patients with wild-type or Val122Ile TTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy also received tafamidis once daily for 12 months, with TTR stabilization at week 6 compared with baseline as the primary end point, and secondary outcome measures, including incidence of treatmentemergent adverse events and change from baseline in echocardiography, cardiac MRI, chest x-ray, and Holter monitoring parameters, NT-proBNP, troponin I and T cardiac biomarkers, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and health-related QOL measures. Compared with nonrandomized, historical controls, patients receiving tafamidis treatment experienced smaller changes from baseline in NT-proBNP and 6MWT measures and a lower incidence of cardiovascular hospitalization/death at 12 months, although the differences were statistically insignificant [91]. Although patients in both studies were older and more severely affected compared with the Val30Met patients in the blinded study, tafamidis was effective in achieving and maintaining TTR tetramer stabilization, and no new safety concerns related to drug therapy were observed.

Diflunisal
A phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial is currently under way evaluating the use of diflunisal 250 mg twice daily for preventing the progression of lower-limb nerve damage in patients with TTR-FAP. The primary end point is the Neurologic Impairment Score+7 (NIS+7) measured at 12 and 24 months. Secondary end points include the Kumamoto neurologic scale score, echocardiographic signs of cardiomyopathy, mBMI, amyloid deposition, and QOL. The study is scheduled to be completed at the end of 2012, with results announced in early 2013. Preliminary data indicate that diflunisal is well tolerated in the study population. An open-label extension study based in Sweden to observe the long-term effects (over the course of about 2 years) of diflunisal on neurologic and cardiac deterioration and nutritional status is currently recruiting patients. An open-label study in a single center in Japan (Shinshu University) reported significant stabilization of disease course [92].

ALN-TTR01 and ALN-TTR02
A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study of ALN-TTR01 in up to 36 patients with TTR amyloidosis is near completion with results expected later in 2012. Preliminary results from a phase 1 trial of ALN-TTR02 indicate an up to 94% reduction of serum TTR levels and nearly 80% suppression after one month following a single dose, which was safe and well tolerated. An open-label phase 2 trial is currently underway.

Doxycycline/TUDCA
A 12-month, phase 2, open-label study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combined doxycycline/TUDCA treatment for TTR amyloidosis is ongoing. Twenty patients with both variant and wild-type TTR were enrolled, including three who had undergone liver transplants 8 to 15 years before initiation of the study. The primary end point was response rate to treatment (non-progression of neuropathy or cardiomyopathy), with responders defined as patients with mBMI reductions of <10% and NIS-LL changes of <2 points (in patients with TTR-FAP) or NT-proBNP concentration increases of <30% or <300 pg mL -1 (in patients with isolated cardiomyopathy). Secondary outcomes included pharmacokinetics, treatment-related adverse events, and change in QOL and neurologic assessments. Preliminary data suggest that the combined treatment can stabilize the disease and has an acceptable toxicity profile.
Competing interests YA, GS, FS, SI, WDL have no conflicts of interest to disclose. JLB has received research support from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and honoraria from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Pfizer Inc for consultation work. TC's institution received support from FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc in October 2010; she has served on the scientific advisory board of Pfizer Inc but was not compensated for this involvement, and received funding from Pfizer Inc for scientific meeting expenses (travel, accommodations, and registration) and for scientific lectures. She currently serves on the THAOS (natural history disease registry) scientific advisory board but does not receive compensation for this involvement. MWC received support from FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc in October 2010, as a clinical investigator, has served on the scientific advisory board of Pfizer Inc, and received funding from Pfizer Inc for scientific meeting expenses (travel, accommodations, and registration). She currently serves on the THAOS (natural history disease registry) scientific advisory board but does not receive compensation for this involvement. B-GE has received support from Pfizer Inc for scientific lectures. LO has received support from Pfizer Inc as a consultant. VP-B received support from FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc in October 2010, as a clinical investigator, and serves on the THAOS (natural history disease registry) scientific advisory board, but does not receive compensation for this involvement. CR has received a single unrestricted research grant from Pfizer Inc.