Skip to main content

Table 1 Classification of case reports and case series according to the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist

From: Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatments in patients with ectodermal dysplasia: a systematic review

Type of study

References

Yes

No

Unclear

Not applicable

n*/N

%

n*/N

%

n*/N

%

n

Case report

Karwetzky et al. [41]

8/8

100.0%

Waggoner et al. [45]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Itthagarun et al. [46]

8/8

100.0%

Köymen et al. [64]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Suri et al. [47] #

6/8

75.0%

1/8

12.5%

1/8

12.5%

Yenisey et al. [48]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Gruber et al. [49]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Altug-Atac et al. [50]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Ioannidou-Marathiotou et al. [51]

8/8

100.0%

Van Sickels et al. [44]#

6/8

75.0%

1/8

12.5%

1/8

12.5%

Akgun et al. [52] #

6/8

75.0%

1/8

12.5%

1/8

12.5%

Machorowska-Pieniążek et al. [53] #

6/8

75.0%

2/8

25.0%

Oblack et al. [66]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Priya et al. [54]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Fraiz et al. [55] #

6/8

75.0%

1/8

12.5%

1/8

12.5%

Shah et al. [43]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Suja et al. [56]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Bergendal et al. [57]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Knobloch et al. [59]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Celli et al. [15]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Kuźniarski et al. [16]

8/8

100.0%

Yajing et al. [61]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Ierardo et al. [62]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Szemraj-Folmer et al. [63]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

12.5%

Wimalarathna et al. [14]

7/8

87.5%

1/8

Gonzaga Luiz et al. [42]

8/8

100.0%

MAXIMUM

8

100.0%

1

12.5%

MINIMUM

6

75.0%

0

0

MEDIAN

7

87.5%

0

0

Case series

Fotso. et al. [65] #

6/10

60.0%

4/10

40.0%

Kościelska et al. [58]

8/10

80.0%

2/10

20.0%

Schanbl et al. [60]

8/10

80.0%

2/10

20.0%

MAXIMUM

8

80.0%

4

40.0%

MINIMUM

6

60.0%

2

20.0%

MEDIAN

8

80.0%

2

20.0%

  1. *The number of Joanna Briggs Institute checklist sub-items for each case report, case series evaluated as “Yes,” “No,” and “Unclear”
  2. Total number of sub-items applicable to the case report/case series
  3. Number of sub-items not applicable to the case report/case series
  4. #Case report or case series whose percentage of “Yes” does not exceed the median value