Criterion | Response during FIHS | Response during follow-up | Decline during follow-up |
---|---|---|---|
Amyloid load | Improvement* in SAP scan from baseline† (pre-dose) at any study visit | Stable or improvement* in SAP scan compared with amyloid load from FIHS | Worsening in SAP scan compared with amyloid load from FIHS |
6MWD | Not applicable | Stable or an increase ≥ 30 m [27] compared with the maximum 6MWD observed during the FIHS | Decrease ≥ 30 m compared with the maximum 6MWD observed during the FIHS |
GGT (only in patients with abnormal GGT and/or hepatic amyloid during the FIHS) | Decrease (> 25%) in GGT from baseline† (pre-dose) at any study visit | Stable or decrease (of any magnitude) compared with the final GGT level observed during the FIHS | Increase (of any magnitude) compared with the final GGT level observed during the FIHS |
eGFR | No formal measure of response. Absolute values reviewed for safety and post-treatment response | Met criteria for an improvement in CTCAE grade [28] in kidney function at any point during follow-up | Met criteria for a decline in CTCAE grade in kidney function at any point during follow-up |
NT-proBNP | No formal measure of response. Reviewed in respect of post-dose transient response in cardiac amyloid patients and in relation to eGFR in renal amyloid patients | Stable or decrease (> 30% reduction and > 300 ng/L [29]) compared with the last NT-proBNP level observed during the FIHS | Increase (> 30% and > 300 ng/L) compared with the last NT-proBNP level observed during the FIHS |