From: Development and pilot implementation of Iranian Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Registry
Features | Percentage of agreement (options 4 and 5) | |
---|---|---|
Purposes of implementing the IRI.HUS registry | Promoting HUS research | 100 |
Accessing to patients' information in their various referrals | 100 | |
Identifying the underlying causes of HUS | 100 | |
Improving the diagnosis/treatment of HUS | 100 | |
Increasing medical knowledge for HUS management | 83 | |
Discovering the infectious sources that cause HUS | 87 | |
Supporting health policy for drug import | 91 | |
Determining the prevalence of HUS in Iran | 100 | |
Enabling international participation in the field of HUS | 100 | |
Organizing a campaign for patients to receive any supports | 100 | |
Inclusion criteria | Uremia and reduced renal function | 100 |
Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia | 100 | |
Reduced platelet count | 100 | |
Increased lactic dehydrogenase | 100 | |
Negative Coombs test* | 44 | |
Diagnosis of HUS by a nephrologist | 100 | |
Only patients under-five years* | 44 | |
Typical HUS | 96 | |
Atypical HUS | 96 | |
Data collection | Retrospective | 100 |
Prospective | 100 | |
Data collection by the patient's physician | 100 | |
Using trained/expert people to collect data | 100 | |
Case finding through HUS diagnostic ICD code in medical records* | 74 | |
Centralized data collection by a reference center | 100 | |
Data quality control | An expert or trained person for data quality control | 100 |
Entering the data of each patient by his/her physician | 100 | |
Continuous evaluation of data quality | 100 | |
Random verification of data by an expert | 100 | |
Determining mandatory fields for data collection | 100 | |
Quality control feedback to data collectors | 100 | |
Evaluation of data quality by the Iranian Society of Pediatric Nephrology | 78 | |
Following data quality guidelines | 100 | |
Using of data quality indicators | 100 | |
Training courses on data quality | 100 | |
Continuous monitoring of incomplete data | 100 | |
Data quality control at the moment it enters the registry (auto by software) | 100 | |
Data sources | Hospitals (especially pediatric referral centers) | 100 |
Pediatric nephrologist offices | 100 | |
Specialized clinics | 100 | |
Specialized laboratories (nephrology or genetics)* | 52 | |
Urban or rural health centers⁑ | 13 | |
Research centers | 100 | |
Analysis of registry data | Determining the ratio (percentage) of patients in terms of each variable | 100 |
Determining the average values of each variable | 100 | |
Determining the ratio of variable values to each other (e.g. the ratio of patients number under five to over five years)* | 44 | |
Comparative charts in terms of each variable | 100 | |
Registry software specifications | Software quality control when entering data (such as software alert and warning about the admission date before the discharge date) | 100 |
No need for additional typing | 100 | |
Automatic calculations when entering data (such as automatic calculation of BSA based on patient height and weight) | 100 | |
Enabling to upload patient reports to software (such as genetic test reports) | 100 | |
Displaying the status of completing or not completing the patient questionnaire in the main list of patients | 100 | |
Possibility of modifying and editing dataا | 100 | |
Displaying the range of normal values of laboratory variables | 87 | |
Displaying a reminder of the date to follow-up patients in the main list of patients | 96 | |
Displaying follow up termination date in the main list of patients | 100 | |
Displaying questionnaires editing date in the patient list | 100 | |
Using a unique patient identification ID | 91 | |
Non displaying patients of the other users in the patient list of physicians | 96 | |
Enabling to receive username and password for new users | 100 | |
Excel spreadsheet outputs | 100 | |
PDF outputs | 100 | |
Chart outputs in three shapes: pie, bar, and linear | 100 | |
Possibility of default and custom reports | 100 | |
Possibility to search for patients based on demographic variables for the user | 100 | |
Possibility to register specialists of different hospitals in the registry as a participant | 100 | |
Possibility to correspond with the registry admin for participants (via email) | 100 |