Williams syndrome: on the role of intellectual abilities in anxiety

Table 3 Between-group comparisons

Variables	Anxiety (N = 15)		No anxiety (N = 9)		t(22)	Bayes factors
Variables	M (SD)	Range	M (SD)	Range	t/Z	BF₀₁	BF₁₀
Age^a	27.6 (14.1)	9–53	32.2 (12.5)	16–49	0.83	2.04	0.49
CGI-S anxiety^a	4.07 (1.03)	3–6	1.67 (0.5)	1–2	− 6.52***	< 0.001	> 500
FSIQ^a	53.73 (7.66)	40–72	62.22 (11.50)	45–79	2.18*	0.27	3.68
Verbal IQ^a	60.93 (8.22)	45–71	72.56 (14.26)	56–97	2.55**	0.35	6.50
Non-verbal IQ^a	57.27 (7.32)	50–76	64.00 (9.0)	50–74	2.00*	0.15	2.87
WM^a	64.73 (7.60)	51–79	67.56 (10.86)	53–82	0.75	1.46	0.68
FTF EF^a	0.89 (0.34)	0.44–1.64	0.88 (0.51)	0.08–1.72	− 0.09	2.47	0.40
FTF Memory^a	0.78 (0.31)	0.36–1.27	0.64 (0.37)	0–1.09	− 1.04	1.10	0.91
FTF Learning^b	1.38 (0.38)	0.70–1.85	1.30 (0.61)	0.48–2.00	− 0.30	1.62	0.69
CCPT CR^b	87.69 (11.70)	57–99	93.88 (3.94)	86–98	− 1.02	1.49	0.58
CCPT CE^a	62.60 (18.38)	44–93	64.33 (16.37)	49–86	0.23	3.03	0.33
CCPT Variability^a	178.70 (94.72)	48–385	112.12 (84.50)	40–304	− 1.67	0.56	1.77

BF₀₁ = Bayes Factor for the null hypothesis, BF₁₀ = Bayes Factor for the alternative hypothesis, CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression Scale—Severity, FSIQ = Full scale IQ, WM = Working Memory, FTF = Five to
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
^aStudents t test was used, ^bMann–Whitney U test was used

ISSN: 1750-1172