Skip to main content

Table 4 Binary logistic regression analysis in EA patients and their parents using the condition-specific EA-QOL questionnaire

From: Parent–child-agreement on health-related quality of life and its determinants in patients born with Esophageal Atresia: a Swedish–German cross-sectional study

 

EA QOL total score

 

PR < CR versus agreementa (n = 51)

PR > CR versus agreementb (n = 45)

 

B

Wald

p

[95% CI]

B

Wald

p

[95% CI]

Child genderc

2.89

4.46

.03

[.01, .81]

1.89

6.21

.01

[1.45, 29.06]

Child age

.43

4.88

.03

[.45, .95]

.24

4.85

.03

[1.03, 1.59]

EA severity leveld

.29

.08

.78

[.18, 10.02]

 .52

.39

.53

[.12, 3.02]

Parental HRQOL

 .05

1.21

.27

[.88, 1.04]

 .05

2.94

.09

[.90, 1.01]

Family functioning

.05

1.37

.24

[.97, 1.14]

.02

.72

.40

[.97, 1.08]

Countrye

2.27

5.07

.02

[1.34, 69.63]

.96

1.86

.17

[.66, 10.34]

Model summary

R2 = .43

R2 = .32

χ2(6) = 15.957, p = .01

χ2(6) = 14.849, p = .02

  1. PR = Parent-report, CR = Child-report, B = regression coefficient, Wald = Wald-value, p = p-value, CI = confidence interval, R2 = Nagelkerkes R-square, EA = Esophageal atresia, HRQOL = Health-related quality of life
  2. a 0 = agreement, 1 = PR < CR, defined using a threshold of ½ SD
  3. b 0 = agreement, 1 = PR > CR, defined using a threshold of ½ SD
  4. c Child gender: 0 = male, 1 = female
  5. d EA severity level: 0 = mild moderate, 1 = severe (Dellenmark–Blom, Dingemann, Witt, Quitmann, Jönsson et al. 2018)
  6. e Country: 0 = Germany; 1 = Sweden