Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies on Duchenne muscular dystrophy epidemiology

From: Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, Year of publication

Catchment area

Data source

Population

Study years

Study design

DMD definition

Prevalence type

Epidemiological estimate per 100,000

[95% CI]

DMD Prevalence

 Danieli, 1977 [25]

Four districts of Veneto Region (Italy)

Hospital records review

Patients with a diagnosis of DMD from 1952 to 1972

1952–1972

Retrospective chart-review study

High serum CK levels on samples of fresh serum from subjects at rest and 6 h after vigorous physical exercise

Period prevalence per 1000,000 males and females of any age

3.4 [2.8–4.2] per 100,000

 Monckton, 1982 [26]

Alberta (Canada)

Hospital/clinic chart review

Cases recorded by three muscular dystrophy association Clinics as well as cases recorded at the Genetics Clinics of the University of Alberta and the Alberta Children’s Hospital

1950–1979

Retrospective chart-review study

Point prevalence in 1979 per 100,000 males of any age

9.5 [7.8–11.6] per 100,000

 Leth, 1985 [27]

Denmark

Collection of data from hospital departments, nursery homes and general practitioners

445 patients with progressive muscular dystrophy alive January 1st 1965

1965–1975

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Histological changes in muscular tissue, typical electromyographic changes, high serum CK levels, family occurrence of progressive muscular dystrophy

Point prevalence per 1000,000 in 1965

6.94 per 100,000a

 Radhakrishnan, 1987 [28]

Benghazi, Lybia

Hospital records review

Patients resident of Benghazi with neuromuscular disorders over the period January 1983–1985

1983–1985

Retrospective chart-review study

DMD diagnosis based on clinical examination, family history, serum CPK, electromyography and investigations to exclude acquired disorders

Point prevalence in 1985 per 100,000

6.0 per 100,000a

 Nakagawa, 1991 [29]

Okinawa (Japan)

Hospital chart review (data collected from hospital departments, nursing homes and social health centers)

Patients with DMD in the whole Okinawa prefecture

1989

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Clinical presentation, high serum CK levels, electromyography, lens examination and immunohistochemical studies with antidystrophin antibody

Point prevalence per 100,000 males of any age

7.1 [5.16–9.6] per 100,000 males

 van Essen, 1992 [30]

The Netherlands

Linkage database containing Dutch DMD registry, National Medical Registration file, Death Registry, Medical Genetics database

All living DMD patients on January 1, 1983 in the Netherlands

1961–1982

Retrospective population-based cohort study

A score was given considering the clinical status, serum CK levels, electromyograms, muscle biopsy findings, electrocardiograms, and familial occurrence compatible with X-linked recessive inheritance, together with the CK levels in the mother and/or sister when available

Point prevalence in 1983 per 100,000 males of any age

5.4 [4.9–6.0] per 100,000 males

 Ahlström, 1993 [31]

Örebro (Sweden)

Clinical chart and administrative data (e.g. early retirement pension, temporary disability pension) review

Patients with a diagnosis of DMD between 1974 and 1987

1974–1988

Retrospective chart-review study

Point prevalence in 1988 per 100,000 males and females of any age

0.7 [0.2–2.7] per 100,000

 Ballo, 1994 [32]

South Africa

Referrals requested from practitioners and genetic clinics

Patients with a diagnosis of DMD between 1987 and 1992

1987–1992

Observational cohort study using retrospectively data

High serum CK levels, electromyography and genetic testing

Period prevalence per 1000 males of any age

0.9 [0.8–1.1] per 100,000 males

 Hughes, 1996 [33]

Northern Ireland

Primary data: Mailed survey

Secondary data: hospital/clinic chart review, administrative data, patient registry

Patients with DMD identified from the records of the North Ireland Muscle Clinic, the North Ireland Medical Genetic Department and from general practitioners, physicians and pediatricians data

1993–1994

Epidemiological survey. Population-based cohort study using prospectively and retrospectively collected data

Not specified

Point prevalence in 1994 per 1000,000 males and females of any age

8.2 [6.3–10.4] per 100,000

 Hughes, 1996 [33]

Northern Ireland

Primary data: mailed survey

Secondary data: hospital/clinic chart review, administrative data, patient registry

Patients with DMD identified from the records of the North Ireland Muscle Clinic, the North Ireland Medical Genetic Department and from general practitioners, physicians and pediatricians data

1993–1994

Epidemiological survey.

Population-based cohort study using prospectively and retrospectively collected data

Not specified

Point prevalence in 1994 per 1000,000 males of any age

4.3 [3.3–5.4] per 100,000 males

 Peterlin, 1997 [34]

Slovenia

Registries and medical records review

DMD cases diagnosed in the period 1969–1984

1969–1984

Retrospective population-based cohort study

DMD diagnosis based on the clinical picture, serum enzymes, electromyography and muscle biopsy

Point prevalence in 1990 per 100,000 males of any age

2.9 [2.0–4.2] per 100,000 males

 Siciliano, 1999 [35]

North-West Tuscany (Italy)

Primary data: mailed survey

Secondary data: hospital/clinical records review, administrative databases

Patients treated in the Unit for Muscle Diseases, University of Pisa

1997

Epidemiological survey.

Population-based cohort study using prospectively and retrospectively collected data

Genetic testing (genomic DNA analysis and dystrophin analysis), clinical exam, high serum CK levels, family history, muscle biopsy

Point prevalence per 100,000 males and females of any age

1.7 [1.1–2.6] per 100,000

 Darin, 2000 [36]

Western Sweden

Residential and outpatient registers, muscle biopsy registries and administrative databases

All individuals with neuromuscular disorders born between 1979 and 1994 and admitted in one of the seven hospitals in the region before 1st January 1995

1995

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Clinical exams, high serum CK levels, family history, muscle biopsy, genetic testing

Point prevalence per 100,000 males, aged less than 16 years

16.8 [11.4–23.8] per 100,000 males

 Jeppesen, 2003 [37]

Aarhus (Denmark)

Medical records of all DMD patients in the Institute of Neuromuscular Diseases, Respiratory Centre East at the State University Hospital and Respiratory Centre West at Aarhus University Hospital

Male Danish population in the period January 1, 1977 to January 1, 2002 and Danish newborn males

1977–2002

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Until 1993, ICD-8 code 330.39 (dystrophia musculorum progressiva) or subcode 330.38 (dystrophia musculorum progressiva, typus Duchenne); from 1994 onward, ICD-10 code G71.0 (dystrophia musculorum) or subcode G71.0H (dystrophia musculorum gravis, Duchenne)

Point prevalence in 2002 per 100,000 males of any age

5.5 [4.6–6.5] per 100,000 males

 Chung, 2003 [38]

Hong Kong

Hospital/clinic chart review from two University teaching hospitals

332 children

aged < 19 years at first assessment with neuromuscular diseases confirmed by using electromyography, muscle biopsy, and/or molecular genetic study

1985–2001

Prospective population-based cohort study

High serum CK level, nerve conduction study, electromyography, muscle biopsy, and molecular genetic study of blood DNA

Point prevalence in 2001 per 1000,000 males aged less than 19 years

9.8 [7.7–12.6] per 100,000 males

 Talkop, 2003 [39]

Estonia

Hospital/clinic chart review, mailed survey, administrative database, patient registry

All patients with DMD born and diagnosed in the period 1977–1999 in Estonia

1994–1999

Epidemiological survey.

Observational cohort study using retrospectively collected data

Not specified

Point prevalence in 1998 per 100,000 males aged less than 20 years

12.8 [8.3–18.8] per 100,000 males

 El-Tallawy, 2005 [40]

Assiut (Egypt)

Door-to-door community survey

52,203 subjects, identified from a door-to-door survey

1996–1997

Cross-sectional study

Electrophysiological and biochemical (high serum CK levels) investigations, genetic testing, muscle biopsy

Point prevalence in 1997 per 100,000 males and females of any age

7.7 [2.1–19.6] per 100,000

 Norwood, 2009 [41]

Northern England

Database of the Institute of Human Genetics in Newcastle and disease-specific databases

All registered patients (children and adults) with inherited muscle diseases diagnosed and currently seen by the neuromuscular team at the Institute of Human Genetics at Newcastle University

2007

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Genetic testing and genetic investigations (deletion, duplication or point mutation in the DMD gene)

Point prevalence per 100,000 males of any age

8.3 [6.8–9.8] per 100,000 males

 Mah, 2011 [42]

Canada

De-identified data consisting of the clinical phenotypes, diagnostic methods, and molecular genetic reports from DBMD patients from the Canadian Pediatric Neuromuscular Group

DBMD patients followed by participating Canadian Pediatric Neuromuscular Group centers

2000–2009

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Clinical phenotypes, diagnostic methods (MLPA, muscular biopsy) and molecular genetic reports

Period prevalence per 10,000 males from birth to 24 years

10.6 [9.7–11.5] per 100,000 males

 Rasmussen, 2012 [43]

South-Eastern Norway

Prospectively collected patient data

Patients aged under 18 years treated by neuropediatricians

2005

Prospective population-based cohort study

Genetic testing (sequencing of the dystrophin gene) and/or muscular biopsy

Point prevalence per 100,000 males from birth to 18 years

16.2 [11.5–22.8] per 100,000 males

 Romitti, 2015 [44]

USA

MD STARnet database

Patients born from January 1982, to December 2011, resided in an MD STARnet site during any part of that time period, and was diagnosed with childhood-onset DBMD

1982–2011

Cross-sectional study

ICD-9 CM code: 359.1 or ICD-10 CM code: G71.0

Point prevalence in 2010 per 10,000 males aged 5–24 years

10.2 [9.2–11.2] per 100,000 males

 Ramos, 2016 [45]

Puerto Rico

Data from 141 patients attending the Muscular Dystrophy Association neuromuscular clinics in Puerto Rico (4 clinics in total)

141 patients attending the Muscular Dystrophy Association neuromuscular clinics in Puerto Rico

2012

Retrospective epidemiological survey

“Definite” cases have symptoms referable to DMD and either (1) a documented DMD gene mutation, (2) muscle biopsy evidencing abnormal dystrophin without an alternative explanation, or (3) CK level at least 10 times normal, pedigree compatible with X-linked recessive inheritance, and an affected family member

Point prevalence per 100,000 males of any age

5.2 [4.2–6.4] per 100,000 males

 Lefter, 2016 [46]

Republic of Ireland

Demographic, clinical, physiologic, histopathology, serology, and genetic data from retrospectively and prospectively identified patients

Adults (≥18 years old) living in the Republic of Ireland ≥5 years

2012–2013

Population-based study using retrospectively and prospectively collected data

Genetic and electrophysiological tests

Point prevalence in 2013 per 100,000 males (≥18 years old)

3.0 [2.3–3.7] per 100,000 males

DMD Birth prevalence

 Brooks, 1977 [47]

South Eastern Scotland

Survey and clinical records review

All cases of DMD who had been born between 1953 and 1968

1953–1968

Retrospective epidemiological survey

Period birth prevalence

26.5 [19.9–35.2] per 100,000 live male births

 Danieli, 1977 [25]

Four districts of Veneto Region (Italy)

Hospital records review

Patients with a diagnosis of DMD from 1952 to 1972

1952–1972

Retrospective chart-review study

High serum CK levels on samples of fresh serum from subjects at rest and 6 h after vigorous physical exercise

Period birth prevalence

28.2 [22.1–35.8] per 100,000 live male births

 Takeshita, 1977 [48]

Shimane (Japan)

Questionnaires sent to nurse-teachers in infant schools, primary schools and junior high schools in Shimane

1956–1970

Epidemiological survey

Neurological exams, electromyography, high CPK levels, muscle biopsy

Period birth prevalence

20.8 [13.3–32.6] per 100,000 live male births

 Drummond, 1979 [49]

New Zealand

Prospectively collected patient data

101 consecutive live births at St Helen’s Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Cross-sectional study

High CPK levels in newborn blood spot

Birth prevalence

20.0 [5.5–72.9] per 100,000 live male births

 Cowan, 1980 [50]

Australia

Survey and clinical records review

DMD cases in New South Wales and in the Australian Capital Territory between 160 and 1971

1960–1971

Retrospective epidemiological survey

Period birth prevalence

18.6 [15.3–22.6] per 100,000 live male births

 Danieli, 1980 [51]

Veneto Region (Italy)

Hospital records review

DMD cases born in the period 1959–1968

1952–1972

Retrospective epidemiological survey

Abnormal CK values

Period birth prevalence

28.2 [23.3–34.2] per 100,000 live male births

 Bertolotto, 1981 [52]

Turin (Italy)

Clinical records review

All DMD cases born in Turin between 1955 and 1974.

1955–1974

Retrospective epidemiological survey

High CPK levels and electromyography

Period birth prevalence

24.2 [19.3–30.5] per 100,000 live male births

 Monckton, 1982 [26]

Alberta (Canada)

Hospital/clinic chart review

Cases recorded by three muscular dystrophy association

Clinics as well as cases recorded at the Genetics Clinics of the University of Alberta and the Alberta Children’s Hospital

1950–1979

Retrospective chart-review study

Period birth prevalence

26.2 [21.7–31.5] per 100,000 live male births

 Nigro, 1983 [53]

Campania Region (Italy)

Prospectively collected patient data

DMD cases born in Campania from 1960 until 1971

1969–1980

Cross-sectional study

DMD diagnosis based on age of onset of symptoms, age of onset of the chairbound stage, pseudohypertrophy of calf muscle, marked elevation of CPK levels, muscle biopsy

Period birth prevalence

21.7 [18.5–25.3] per 100,000 live male births

 Dellamonica, 1983 [54]

France

Prospectively collected patient data

Blood samples of 158,000 newborns obtained 4 to 8 days postnatally

1978

Cross-sectional study

High CPK levels in newborn blood spot

Birth prevalence

16.9 [9.7–29.5] per 100,000 live male births

 Leth, 1985 [27]

Denmark

Collection of data from hospital departments, nursery homes and general practitioners

445 patients with progressive muscular dystrophy alive January 1st 1965

1965–1975

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Histological changes in muscular tissue, typical electromyografic changes, high serum CK levels, family occurrence of progressive muscular dystrophy

Period birth prevalence

22.2 per 100,000a

 Scheuerbrandt, 1986 [55]

West Germany

Prospectively collected patient data

1977–1984

Cross-sectional study

High CK activity in newborn blood spot

Period birth prevalence

27.2 [20.5–36.0] per 100,000 live male births

 Mostacciuolo, 1987 [56]

Five districts of Veneto Region (Italy)

Hospital records review

DMD cases born in the period 1959–1968

1955–1984

Retrospective epidemiological survey

DMD diagnosis based on electromyography, muscle biopsy, serum enzymes, and clinical history of the patients

Period birth prevalence

26.0 [34.4–53.9] per 100,000 live male births

 Takeshita, 1987 [57]

Western Japan

Data collected from the preschool development screening program, from public institutions for children and 5 hospitals

DMD cases born between 1956 and 1980

1956–1980

Retrospective population-based cohort study

DMD diagnosis based on electromyography, serum CK levels and muscle biopsy

Period birth prevalence

19.1 [14.5–25.2] per 100,000 live male births

 Greenberg, 1988 [58]

Canada

Prospectively collected patient data

18,000 newborn males screened for DMD in the routine Manitoba perinatal screening program

1986–1987

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot, muscle biopsy

Period birth prevalence

27.8 [11.9–65.0] per 100,000 live male births

 Tangsrud, 1989 [59]

Southern Norway

Clinical records and national databases review

All boys with a known history of Duchenne muscle dystrophy born during the period 1968–1977

1968–1977

Retrospective chart-review study

Muscle biopsies, electromyographic changes, high serum CK levels

Period birth prevalence

21.9 [13.5–35.6] per 100,000 males

 Norman, 1989 [60]

Wales

Retrospectively and prospectively collected patient data

1971–1986

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels

Period birth prevalence

24.7 per 100,000 malesa

 van Essen, 1992 [30]

The Netherlands

Linkage database containing Dutch DMD registry, National Medical Registration file, Death Registry, Medical Genetics database

All males with

DMD both born and diagnosed in the period 1961–1982 in the Netherlands

1961–1982

Retrospective population-based cohort study

A score was given considering the clinical status, serum CK levels, electromyograms, muscle biopsy findings, electrocardiograms, and familial occurrence compatible with X-linked recessive inheritance, together with the CK levels in the mother and/or sister when available.

Period birth prevalence

23.7 [20.7–26.7] per 100,000 live male births

 Merlini, 1992 [61]

Bologna (Italy)

Clinical records review

Children born between 1970 and 1989 in Bologna (Italy)

1970–1982

Retrospective epidemiological survey

Period birth prevalence

25.8 [16.7–39.8] per 100,000 live male births

 Bradley, 1993 [62]

Wales

Blood samples obtained through screening program for

phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism in all maternity units throughout Wales

1990–1992

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot, genetic testing, molecular genetic mutation analysis, muscle biopsy and dystrophin analysis.

Period birth prevalence

26.3 [13.8–49.9] per 100,000 live male births

 Peterlin, 1997 [34]

Slovenia

Registries and medical records review

DMD cases diagnosed in the period 1969–1984

1969–1984

Retrospective population-based cohort study

DMD diagnosis based on the clinical picture, serum enzymes, electromyography and muscle biopsy

Period birth prevalence

13.8 [9.6–19.8] per 100,000 live male births

 Drousiotou, 1998 [63]

Cyprus

5170 blood samples obtained through the national screening center for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism

30,014 newborn males screened for DMD

1992–1997

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot

Period birth prevalence

16.7 [7.1–39.0] per 100,000 live male births

 Jeppesen, 2003 [37]

Aarhus (Denmark)

Medical records of all DMD patients in the Institute of Neuromuscular Diseases, Respiratory Centre East at the State University Hospital and Respiratory Centre West at Aarhus University Hospital

Danish

live born males from 1972 to 2001

1992–1996

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Until 1993, ICD-8 code 330.39 (dystrophia musculorum progressiva) or subcode 330.38 (dystrophia musculorum progressiva, typus Duchenne); from 1994 onward, ICD-10 code G71.0 (dystrophia musculorum) or subcode G71.0H (dystrophia musculorum gravis, Duchenne)

Period birth prevalence

18.8 [12.4–25.2] per 100,000 live male births

 Talkop, 2003 [39]

Estonia

Hospital/clinic chart review, mailed survey, administrative database, patient registry

All patients with DMD born and diagnosed in the period 1977–1999 in Estonia

1986–1990

Observational cohort study using retrospectively collected data

Not specified

Period birth prevalence

17.7 [8.8–31.6] per 100,000 live male births

 Eyskens, 2006 [64]

Antwerp (Belgium)

Prospectively collected patient data

281,214 newborn males screened for dystrophinopathy

1979–2003

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot

Period birth prevalence

18.2 [7.1–39.0] per 100,000 live male births

 Dooley, 2010 [65]

Nova Scotia (Canada)

Records of DMD diagnosis from the Pediatric Neurology Division (Dalhousie University) and the IWK Health Centre

All patients with DMD in Nova Scotia

1969–2003

Retrospective population-based cohort study

Muscle biopsy or genetic testing

Period birth prevalence

21.3 [13.8–23.8] per 100,000 live male births

 Mendell, 2012 [66]

Ohio (USA)

Prospectively collected patient data

37,649 newborn male subjects screened for DMD

2007–2011

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot and genetic testing (MLPA)

Period birth prevalence

15.9 [7.3–34.8] per 100,000 live male births

 Moat, 2013 [67]

Wales

Blood spots collected routinely as part of the Wales newborn screening program

343,170 newborn blood spots screened for DMD

1990–2011

Cross-sectional study

High CK levels in newborn blood spot

Period birth prevalence

19.5 [15.4–24.5] per 100,000 live male births

 König, 2019 [68]

Germany

Neuromuscular centers, genetic institutes and the German patient registries

Patients with either dystrophinopathies or SMA born between 1995 and 2018.

1995–2018

Retrospective epidemiological study

Point birth prevalence

1.5 [0.7–3.3] per 100,000 live male births

  1. Abbreviations: CK Creatinine kinase, DBMD Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy, DMD Duchenne muscular dystrophy, ICD-8 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 8th edition, ICD-9 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th edition, ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th edition, MPLA Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
  2. a95% confidence intervals could not be calculated as the crude numbers required to calculate the epidemiological estimate were not provided in the papers